Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

IBM and the Holocaust

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2001 book by Edwin Black
This article is about the book. For the historical background, seeIBM and World War II.
IBM and the Holocaust
Paperback expanded edition cover
AuthorEdwin Black
Original titleIBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance between Nazi Germany and America's Most Powerful Corporation
LanguageEnglish
GenreNon-fiction
PublisherDialog Press
Publication date
2001, 2002, 2008, 2012(expanded edition with documents), and 2021 (updated 20th anniversary)
Publication placeUnited States
ISBN9780914153283 (2012)
OCLC49419235
WebsiteOfficial websiteEdit this at Wikidata

IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance between Nazi Germany and America's Most Powerful Corporation is a book by investigative journalist and historianEdwin Black which documents the strategic technology services rendered by US-based multinational corporationInternational Business Machines (IBM) and its German and other European subsidiaries for the government ofAdolf Hitler from the beginning of theThird Reich through to the last day of the regime, at the end ofWorld War II when the US and Germany wereat war with each other.

Published in 2001, with numerous subsequent expanded editions, Black outlined the key role of IBM's technology inthe Holocaust genocide committed by the German Nazi regime, by facilitating the regime's generation and tabulation ofpunched cards for nationalcensus data, military logistics, ghetto statistics, train traffic management, and concentration camp capacity.[1]

Summary

[edit]

In the early 1880s,Herman Hollerith, an employee of theU.S. Census Bureau, created punched cards with standardized perforations. Each hole represented traits such as gender, nationality, or occupation. The cards could be sorted mechanically to produce statistical portraits of the population.[2] A circuit-closing device recorded the data and allowed searches by trait.

In 1910, Willy Heidinger founded the Deutsche Hollerith Maschinen Gesellschaft (Dehomag), IBM’s German licensee. Hollerith sold his U.S. company the next year toCharles Ranlett Flint for US$1.41 million. The firm became part of the newComputing-Tabulating-Recording Company (CTR), led by salesmanThomas J. Watson. CTR acquired Dehomag outright in 1923, and in 1924 Watson renamed CTR as International Business Machines (IBM).[3]

Relationship with Nazi Germany

[edit]

According to Black, IBM maintained business ties with the Nazi regime afterAdolf Hitler took power in January 1933. Repression of political opponents and Jews began immediately; by April, about 60,000 had been imprisoned. A concentration camp was opened atDachau in March 1933. Despite international boycott calls, IBM continued to operate in Germany, and Heidinger openly supported the new government.[4]

In April 1933, the government announced a national census to identify Jews, Roma, and other groups. Black reports that Dehomag offered its services in Prussia and that Watson approved new investments, raising IBM’s capital in Germany from 400,000 to 7 million Reichsmarks. The funds financed IBM’s first German factory in Berlin. Black also describes a “secret deal” between Watson and Heidinger giving Dehomag authority to serve IBM clients outside Germany, and argues that Germany soon became IBM’s second-largest market. He states that the 1933 census, using IBM machines, raised the official estimate of Jews in Germany from roughly half a million to about two million.[5]

Expansion during World War II

[edit]

Black contends that as German forces occupied other countries, IBM subsidiaries in Germany and Poland supplied equipment for new censuses. He writes that these operations aided the identification and concentration of Jewish populations. He further states that every concentration camp maintained a Hollerith department to track prisoners and concludes that the camps could not have processed their numbers without IBM’s machines, service, and cards.[6]

Operations in occupied Poland

[edit]

Black later wrote that IBM New York created a subsidiary in Poland, Watson Business Machines, after the 1939 invasion. The firm managed railway traffic in theGeneral Government and ran a punch-card printing shop near theWarsaw Ghetto. He stated that this subsidiary reported through Geneva to IBM New York, and revenues were transferred accordingly.[7]

Leasing and servicing model

[edit]

Black emphasizes that IBM leased, rather than sold, its machines. The company retained control of punch-card supply and provided service through subsidiaries. Each set of cards was custom-designed to Nazi requirements. He later wrote that the IBM headquarters in New York oversaw these arrangements through subsidiaries across Europe.[8]

Reception

[edit]

IBM's response

[edit]

Though IBM has never directly denied any of the evidence posed by the book, it has criticized Black's research methods and accusatory conclusions.[9] IBM claimed it does not have any other information about the company during its World War II period or the operations of Dehomag, as it argued most documents were destroyed or lost during the war.[10] IBM also claimed that an earlier dismissed lawsuit, initiated by lawyers representing concentration camp survivors, was filed in 2001 to coincide with Black's book launch.[10] Lawyers for the Holocaust victims acknowledged the timing of the lawsuit to coincide with Black's book release, explaining their public relations strategies played an important role in their record of achieving Nazi-era settlements totaling more than $7 billion without winning a judgment.[11]

After the publication of Black's updated 2002 paperback edition, IBM responded by stating it wasn't convinced there were any new findings and there was no proof IBM had enabled the Holocaust.[12][13] IBM rejected Black's assertion that IBM was hiding information and records regarding its World War II era.[14] Several years previously, IBM had given its corporate records of the period to academic archives in New York andStuttgart, Germany, for review by undefined "independent scholars".[13] In early 2021, Black published the 20th anniversary edition with special public events and a syndicated article stating that in twenty years, "not a comma has been changed", adding that "IBM has never requested a correction or denied any facts in the book."[15][16][17]

Wikipedia editing controversy

[edit]

In 2010, Black reported on unidentifiedWikipedia editors marginalizing his research on IBM's role in the Holocaust.[18] It is not clear whether the editors involved were IBM employees, but Black states that, "[they were] openly fortified by official IBM corporate archivist Paul Lasewicz using his real name, and others"; Black nevertheless calls Lasewicz a "man of integrity" and points out that he deferred taking the lead because of potential conflict of interest and then recused himself entirely.[19][20]

Critical response

[edit]

The book was published on February 11, 2001, simultaneously in 40 countries in 14 languages, with numerous subsequent expanded editions, and hundreds of published reviews in many languages have appeared.[21] At the first edition release in 2001,Newsweek called the book "explosive", adding, "backed by exhaustive research, Black's case is simple and stunning. ... Black clearly demonstrates that Nazi Germany employed IBM Hollerith punch-card machines to perform critical tasks in carrying out the Holocaust and the German war effort ... Black establishes beyond dispute that IBM Hollerith machines significantly advanced Nazi efforts to exterminate Jewry."[22] In 2003, theAmerican Society of Journalists and Authors acknowledgedIBM and the Holocaust with its award for Best Non-Fiction Book of the Year.[23]

Richard Bernstein, writing forThe New York Times Book Review about the original 2001 first edition, said "Edwin Black makes a copiously documented case for the utter amorality of the profit motive and its indifference to consequences" but that Black's case "is long and heavily documented, and yet he does not demonstrate that IBM bears some unique or decisive responsibility for the evil that was done".[24] In a 2001 review in theLos Angeles Times, historian andUCLA professorSaul Friedlander wrote, "The author convincingly shows the relentless efforts made by IBM to maximize profit by selling its machines and its punch cards to a country whose criminal record would soon be widely recognized. Indeed, Black demonstrates with great precision that the godlike owner of the corporation, Thomas Watson, was impervious to the moral dimension of his dealings with Hitler's Germany and for years even had a soft spot for the Nazi regime."[25]

In another review of the first edition,David Cesarani ofSouthampton University stated that Black provided "shocking evidence" that IBM in America continued to provide punch cards and other services to the Nazis "in defiance of Allied regulations against trading with the enemy."[26] In a 2001 review of the first edition inThe Atlantic,Jack Beatty wrote, "This is a shocking book ... Edwin Black has documented a sordid relationship between this great American company and the Third Reich, one that extended into the war years." Robert Urekew's review in theHarvard International Review stated: "Black's meticulous documentation reveals an undeniable fact: after the outbreak of the World War II, the IBM corporation knew the whereabouts of each of its European-leased machines, and what revenues it could expect from them."[27]

After the updated paperback edition in 2002,Oliver Burkeman wrote forThe Guardian, "The paperback provides the first evidence that the company's dealings with the Nazis were controlled from its New York headquarters throughout the second world war."[12] Sam Jaffe inBusinessweek wrote: "With exhaustive research, Black makes the case that IBM and Watson conspired with Nazi Germany to help automate the genocide of Europe's Jews."[citation needed]Reuters reported in 2002 that historians on Black's research team stated the paperback edition had used newly discovered Nazi documents and Polish eyewitness testimony to link IBM's U.S. operations directly to theThird Reich operations in Poland.[citation needed] Several reviewers publicly retracted their negative reviews, with signed written apologies and donations to Holocaust museums, including reviewers inThe Jerusalem Report,Nature Magazine,AudioFile magazine,Annals of the History of Computing, and the World Association of International Scholars.[28]

Related legal actions

[edit]

In February 2001, anAlien Tort Claims Act claim was filed in U.S. federal court against IBM for allegedly providing the punched card technology that facilitated the Holocaust, and for covering up German IBM subsidiaryDehomag's activities.[11][29] There was no evidence in the suit that IBM officials in New York explicitly ordered that technology be supplied to the Nazis with the understanding it would be used in concentration camps; however, lawyers representing victims of Nazi oppression claimed Dehomag's founder Heidinger expressed pride in giving Hitler data that could be used in "corrective interventions", and pledged to "follow his orders blindly".[11] In April 2001, the lawsuit was dropped after lawyers feared the suit would slow down payments from a German Holocaust fund for Holocaust survivors who had suffered under Nazi persecution.[29] IBM's German division had paid $3 million into the fund, while clearly avoiding admission of liability.[29]

In 2004, the Roma human rights organizationGypsy International Recognition and Compensation Action (GIRCA) filed suit against IBM inSwitzerland.[29] However, the case was dismissed in 2006 under the relevant statute of limitations.[30] TheElectronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) said in a 2015 unrelated lawsuit filed in U.S. federal court against IBM, "We point out the disturbing parallels between IBM's actionsvis-à-vis South Africa and Nazi Germany: IBM New York purposefully 'facilitated gross human rights abuses by the Third Reich.'"[31][32]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Preston, Peter (February 18, 2001)."Six million and counting".The Observer.guardian.co.uk. RetrievedJune 14, 2001.
  2. ^Black, Edwin (2009) [2001].IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance Between Nazi Germany and America's Most Powerful Corporation (2nd paperback ed.). Washington, DC: Dialog Press. p. 25.OCLC 958727212.;Jefferson, Brian (2020).Digitize and Punish: Racial Criminalization in the Digital Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. p. 20.
  3. ^Black, Edwin (2009).IBM and the Holocaust (2nd paperback ed.). Dialog Press. pp. 30–44.
  4. ^Black, Edwin (2009).IBM and the Holocaust (2nd paperback ed.). Dialog Press. pp. 44–50.
  5. ^Black, Edwin (2009).IBM and the Holocaust (2nd paperback ed.). Dialog Press. pp. 55–110.
  6. ^Black, Edwin (2009).IBM and the Holocaust (2nd paperback ed.). Dialog Press. pp. 193–198,351–352.
  7. ^Burkeman, Oliver (29 March 2002)."IBM 'dealt directly with Holocaust organisers'".The Guardian. Retrieved31 July 2017.;Black, Edwin (19 May 2002)."The business of making the trains to Auschwitz run on time".San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved31 July 2017.
  8. ^Black, Edwin (19 May 2002)."The business of making the trains to Auschwitz run on time".San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved31 July 2017.;Beatty, Jack (April 2001)."Hitler's Willing Business Partners".The Atlantic. Retrieved2 October 2021.;Black, Edwin (2012)."IBM's Role in the Holocaust — What the New Documents Reveal".HuffPost. Retrieved23 October 2017.
  9. ^Bazyler, Michael J. (2005).Holocaust Justice: The Battle for Restitution in America's Courts. New York: New York University Press. p. 303.
  10. ^abIBM Press Room (February 14, 2001)."IBM Statement on Nazi-era Book and Lawsuit".Press Release. Armonk, New York. Archived fromthe original on May 18, 2006.
  11. ^abcFeder, Barnaby (February 11, 2001)."Lawsuit Says I.B.M. Aided The Nazis In Technology".The New York Times. RetrievedOctober 1, 2017.
  12. ^abBurkeman, Oliver (March 29, 2002)."IBM 'dealt directly with Holocaust organisers'".The Guardian.guardian.co.uk. RetrievedJuly 31, 2017.
  13. ^abGrace, Francie (March 27, 2002)."IBM And Nazi Germany: Researcher Has New Documents On World War II Conduct".CBS News.
  14. ^IBM Press Room (March 29, 2002)."Addendum to IBM Statement on Nazi-era Book and Lawsuit".Press Release. Armonk, New York. Archived fromthe original on February 5, 2021. RetrievedJuly 13, 2021.
  15. ^Black, Edwin (February 8, 2021)."IBM and the Holocaust — 20 Years of Corporate Denial".The Times of Israel.
  16. ^Black, Edwin (February 8, 2021)."IBM and the Holocaust—20 years of corporate denial".Israel National News.
  17. ^Black, Edwin."Barnes & Noble Launch Event for IBM and the Holocaust hardcover 2021 re-issue | The Edwin Black Show".The Edwin Black Show. Archived fromthe original on 2021-12-03. Retrieved2021-10-02.
  18. ^Black, Edwin (April 12, 2010)."Wikipedia—The Dumbing Down of World Knowledge".The Cutting Edge News. Archived from the original on January 31, 2018. RetrievedMay 23, 2019.
  19. ^Black, Edwin (April 12, 2010)."Wikipedia—The Dumbing Down of World Knowledge". Editorial.History News Network.George Washington University. RetrievedMay 23, 2019.
  20. ^Barillas, Martin (April 9, 2010)."Martin Barillas: Wikipedia Blocks Users in Response to Edwin Black Article".History News Network. RetrievedMay 24, 2019.
  21. ^Black, Edwin (2012)."IBM's Role in the Holocaust — What the New Documents Reveal".Huffington Post. RetrievedOctober 23, 2017.
  22. ^Hirsh, Michael (February 18, 2001)."'Dark Questions For IBM".Newsweek. RetrievedOctober 23, 2017.
  23. ^"2003 ASJA Writing Awards Recipients".American Society of Journalists and Authors. 2003. Archived fromthe original on October 2, 2017. RetrievedOctober 1, 2017.
  24. ^Bernstein, Richard (March 7, 2001)."'IBM and the Holocaust': Assessing the Culpability". Books.The New York Times. RetrievedOctober 1, 2017.
  25. ^Friedlander, Saul (May 20, 2001)."Was IBM good for the Jews?".Los Angeles Times.
  26. ^Cesarani, David (July 13, 2001)."Tricky trading with the enemy: IBM and the Holocaust".Times of Higher Education. RetrievedSeptember 28, 2017.
  27. ^"Harvard International Review".Harvard International Review. Vol. 23, no. 4. 2002. RetrievedJuly 13, 2021.
  28. ^"Retractions".Edwin Black. Archived fromthe original on 2021-07-25. RetrievedJuly 13, 2021.
  29. ^abcdRamasastry, Anita (July 8, 2004)."A Swiss court allows Gypsies' Holocaust lawsuit to proceed, Case questions role of corporate giant IBM in World War II". Law Center, Find Law.CNN.com. RetrievedOctober 26, 2004.
  30. ^Sydney Morning Herald staff (August 19, 2006)."Swiss high court rejects Gypsy Holocaust suit versus IBM, cites time limit".The Sydney Morning Herald. AP Digital. RetrievedApril 13, 2010.
  31. ^Kayyali, Dia (February 5, 2015)."EFF Files Amicus Brief in Case That Seeks to Hold IBM Responsible for Facilitating Apartheid in South Africa".Electronic Frontier Foundation. RetrievedSeptember 28, 2017.
  32. ^Ruble, Kayla (February 25, 2015)."South African Plaintiffs Are Using an 18th Century Law to Take IBM to Task For Allegedly Facilitating Apartheid".Vice News. RetrievedSeptember 28, 2017.

External links

[edit]
History
Products
Hardware
Current
Former
Business
entities
Current
Former
Facilities
Initiatives
Inventions
Terminology
CEOs
Board of
directors
Other
International
National
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IBM_and_the_Holocaust&oldid=1318341947"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp