Ahypergiant (luminosity class0,Ia-0 orIa+)[1] is a very rare type ofstar that has an extremely highluminosity, mass, size and mass loss because of its extremestellar winds. The termhypergiant is defined asluminosity class 0 (zero) in theMKK system. However, this is rarely seen in literature or in published spectral classifications, except for specific well-defined groups such as theyellow hypergiants, RSG (red supergiants), or blueB(e) supergiants with emission spectra. More commonly, hypergiants are classed as Ia-0 or Ia+, but red supergiants are rarely assigned these spectral classifications.Astronomers are interested in these stars because they relate to understanding stellar evolution, especially star formation, stability, and their expected demise assupernovae. Notable examples of hypergiants include thePistol Star, a blue hypergiant located close to theGalactic Center and one of themost luminous stars known;Rho Cassiopeiae, a yellow hypergiant that is one of the brightest to the naked eye; andMu Cephei (Herschel's "Garnet Star"), one of thelargest and brightest stars known.
In 1956, the astronomersFeast andThackeray used the termsuper-supergiant (later changed into hypergiant) for stars with anabsolute magnitude brighter thanMV = −7 (MBol will be larger for very cool and very hot stars, for example at least −9.7 for a B0 hypergiant). In 1971,Keenan suggested that the term would be used only forsupergiants showing at least one broad emission component inHα, indicating an extended stellar atmosphere or a relatively large mass loss rate. The Keenan criterion is the one most commonly used by scientists today;[2] hence it is possible for a supergiant star to have a higher luminosity than a hypergiant of the same spectral class.
Hypergiants are expected to have a characteristic broadening and red-shifting of their spectral lines, producing a distinctive spectral shape known as aP Cygni profile. The use of hydrogen emission lines is not helpful for defining the coolest hypergiants, and these are largely classified by luminosity since mass loss is almost inevitable for the class.[citation needed]
Stars with an initial mass above about 25 M☉ quickly move away from the main sequence and increase somewhat in luminosity to become blue supergiants. They cool and enlarge at approximately constant luminosity to become a red supergiant, then contract and increase in temperature as the outer layers are blown away. They may "bounce" backwards and forwards executing one or more "blue loops", still at a fairly steady luminosity, until they explode as asupernova or completely shed their outer layers to become aWolf–Rayet star. Stars with an initial mass above about 40 M☉ are simply too luminous to develop a stable extended atmosphere and so they never cool sufficiently to become red supergiants. The most massive stars, especially rapidly rotating stars with enhanced convection and mixing, may skip these steps and move directly to the Wolf–Rayet stage.
This means that stars at the top of theHertzsprung–Russell diagram where hypergiants are found may be newly evolved from the main sequence and still with high mass, or much more evolved post-red supergiant stars that have lost a significant fraction of their initial mass, and these objects cannot be distinguished simply on the basis of their luminosity and temperature. High-mass stars with a high proportion of remaining hydrogen are more stable, while older stars with lower masses and a higher proportion of heavy elements have less stable atmospheres due to increased radiation pressure and decreased gravitational attraction. These are thought to be the hypergiants, near theEddington limit and rapidly losing mass.
The yellow hypergiants are thought to be generally post-red supergiant stars that have already lost most of their atmospheres and hydrogen. A few more stable high mass yellow supergiants with approximately the same luminosity are known and thought to be evolving towards the red supergiant phase, but these are rare as this is expected to be a rapid transition. Because yellow hypergiants are post-red supergiant stars, there is a fairly hard upper limit to their luminosity at around 500,000–750,000 L☉, but blue hypergiants can be much more luminous, sometimes several millionL☉.
Almost all hypergiants exhibit variations in luminosity over time due to instabilities within their interiors, but these are small except for two distinct instability regions whereluminous blue variables (LBVs) andyellow hypergiants are found. Because of their high masses, the lifetime of a hypergiant is very short in astronomical timescales: only a few million years compared to around 10 billion years for stars like theSun. Hypergiants are only created in the largest and densest areas of star formation and because of their short lives, only a small number are known despite their extreme luminosity that allows them to be identified even in neighbouring galaxies. The time spent in some phases such as LBVs can be as short as a few thousand years.[3][4]
As the luminosity of stars increases greatly with mass, the luminosity of hypergiants often lies very close to theEddington limit, which is the luminosity at which the radiation pressure expanding the star outward equals the force of the star's gravity collapsing the star inward. This means that theradiative flux passing through thephotosphere of a hypergiant may be nearly strong enough to lift off the photosphere. Above the Eddington limit, the star would generate so much radiation that parts of its outer layers would be thrown off in massive outbursts; this would effectively restrict the star from shining at higher luminosities for longer periods.
A good candidate for hosting a continuum-driven wind isEta Carinae, one of the most massive stars ever observed. With an estimated mass of around 130solar masses and a luminosity four million times that of theSun, astrophysicists speculate thatEta Carinae may occasionally exceed theEddington limit.[5] The last time might have been a series of outbursts observed in 1840–1860, reaching mass loss rates much higher than our current understanding of what stellar winds would allow.[6]
As opposed to line-drivenstellar winds (that is, ones driven by absorbing light from the star in huge numbers of narrowspectral lines), continuum driving does not require the presence of"metallic"atoms — atoms other thanhydrogen andhelium, which have few such lines — in thephotosphere. This is important, since most massive stars also are very metal-poor, which means that the effect must work independently of themetallicity. In the same line of reasoning, the continuum driving may also contribute to an upper mass limit even for thefirst generation of stars right after theBig Bang, which did not contain any metals at all.
Another theory to explain the massive outbursts of, for example,Eta Carinae is the idea of a deeply situated hydrodynamic explosion, blasting off parts of the star's outer layers. The idea is that the star, even at luminosities below theEddington limit, would have insufficientheat convection in the inner layers, resulting in a density inversion potentially leading to a massive explosion. The theory has, however, not been explored very much, and it is uncertain whether this really can happen.[7]
Another theory associated with hypergiant stars is the potential to form a pseudo-photosphere, that is a spherical optically dense surface that is actually formed by the stellar wind rather than being the true surface of the star. Such a pseudo-photosphere would be significantly cooler than the deeper surface below the outward-moving dense wind. This has been hypothesized to account for the "missing" intermediate-luminosity LBVs and the presence of yellow hypergiants at approximately the same luminosity and cooler temperatures. The yellow hypergiants are actually the LBVs having formed a pseudo-photosphere and so apparently having a lower temperature.[8]
Relationships with Ofpe, WNL, LBV, and other supergiant stars
Hypergiants are evolved, high luminosity, high-mass stars that occur in the same or similar regions of theHertzsprung–Russell diagram as some stars with different classifications. It is not always clear whether the different classifications represent stars with different initial conditions, stars at different stages of an evolutionary track, or is just an artifact of our observations. Astrophysical models explaining the phenomena[9][10] show many areas of agreement. Yet there are some distinctions that are not necessarily helpful in establishing relationships between different types of stars.[citation needed]
Although mostsupergiant stars are less luminous than hypergiants of similar temperature, a few fall within the same luminosity range.[11] Ordinary supergiants compared to hypergiants often lack the strong hydrogen emissions whose broadened spectral lines indicate significant mass loss. Evolved lower mass supergiants do not return from the red supergiant phase, either exploding as supernovae or leaving behind a white dwarf.[citation needed]
Upper portion of H-R Diagram showing the location of the S Doradus instability strip and the location of LBV outbursts. Main sequence is the thin sloping line on the lower left.
Luminous blue variables are a class of highly luminous hot stars that display characteristic spectral variation. They often lie in a "quiescent" zone with hotter stars generally being more luminous, but periodically undergo large surface eruptions and move to a narrow zone where stars of all luminosities have approximately the same temperature, around 8,000 K (13,940 °F; 7,730 °C).[12] This "active" zone is near the hot edge of the unstable "void" whereyellow hypergiants are found, with some overlap. It is not clear whether yellow hypergiants ever manage to get past the instability void to become LBVs or explode as a supernova.[13][14]
Blue hypergiants are found in the same parts of the HR diagram as LBVs but do not necessarily show the LBV variations. Some but not all LBVs show the characteristics of hypergiant spectra at least some of the time,[15][16] but many authors would exclude all LBVs from the hypergiant class and treat them separately.[17] Blue hypergiants that do not show LBV characteristics may be progenitors of LBVs, or vice versa, or both.[18] Lower mass LBVs may be a transitional stage to or from cool hypergiants or are different type of object.[18][19]
Wolf–Rayet stars are extremely hot stars that have lost much or all of their outer layers. WNL is a term used for late stage (i.e. cooler) Wolf–Rayet stars with spectra dominated by nitrogen. Although these are generally thought to be the stage reached by hypergiant stars after sufficient mass loss, it is possible that a small group of hydrogen-rich WNL stars are actually progenitors of blue hypergiants or LBVs. These are the closely related Ofpe (O-type spectra plus H, He, and N emission lines, and other peculiarities) and WN9 (the coolest nitrogen Wolf–Rayet stars) which may be a brief intermediate stage between high mass main-sequence stars and hypergiants or LBVs. Quiescent LBVs have been observed with WNL spectra and apparent Ofpe/WNL stars have changed to show blue hypergiant spectra. High rotation rates cause massive stars to shed their atmospheres quickly and prevent the passage from main sequence to supergiant, so these directly become Wolf–Rayet stars. Wolf Rayet stars, slash stars, cool slash stars (aka WN10/11), Ofpe, Of+, and Of* stars are not considered hypergiants. Although they are luminous and often have strong emission lines, they have characteristic spectra of their own.[20]
Hypergiants are difficult to study due to their rarity. Many hypergiants have highly variable spectra, but they are grouped here into broad spectral classes.
Eta Carinae, inside theCarina Nebula (NGC 3372) in the southern constellation ofCarina. Eta Carinae is extremely massive, possibly as much as 120 to 150 times the mass of the Sun, and is four to five million times as luminous. Possibly a different type of object from the LBVs, or extreme for a LBV.
P Cygni, in the northern constellation ofCygnus. Prototype for the general characteristics ofLBV spectral lines.
S Doradus, in theLarge Magellanic Cloud, in the southern constellation ofDorado. Prototype variable, LBVs are still sometimes called S Doradus variables.
ThePistol Star (V4647 Sgr), near the center of the Milky Way, in the constellation ofSagittarius. The Pistol Star is over 25 times more massive than the Sun, and is about 1.7 million times more luminous. Considered a candidate LBV, but variability has not been confirmed.
M type spectra, the largest known stars by radius. Hypergiant luminosity classes are rarely applied to red supergiants, although the termred hypergiant is sometimes applied to the most extended and unstable red supergiants, with radii on the order of 1,000 to 2,000 R☉.
^Cyril Georgy; Sylvia Ekström; Georges Meynet; Philip Massey; Levesque; Raphael Hirschi; Patrick Eggenberger; André Maeder (2012). "Grids of stellar models with rotation II. WR populations and supernovae/GRB progenitors at Z = 0.014".Astronomy & Astrophysics.542: A29.arXiv:1203.5243.Bibcode:2012A&A...542A..29G.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118340.S2CID119226014.
^Langer, Norbert; Heger, Alexander; García-Segura, Guillermo (1998).Massive Stars: The Pre-Supernova Evolution of Internal and Circumstellar Structure. Reviews in Modern Astronomy. Vol. 11. p. 57.Bibcode:1998RvMA...11...57L.
^abNieuwenhuijzen, H; de Jager, C (2000). "Checking the yellow evolutionary void. Three evolutionary critical Hypergiants: HD 33579, HR 8752 & IRC +10420".Astronomy and Astrophysics.353:163–176.Bibcode:2000A&A...353..163N.
^abcdefSamus', N. N.; Kazarovets, E. V.; Durlevich, O. V.; Kireeva, N. N.; Pastukhova, E. N. (2017). "General catalogue of variable stars: Version GCVS 5.1".Astronomy Reports.61 (1): 80.Bibcode:2017ARep...61...80S.doi:10.1134/S1063772917010085.
^Sterken, C.; de Groot, M.; van Genderen, A. M. (1998). "Cyclicities in the Light Variations of Luminzus Blue Variables II. R40 developing an S Doradus phase".Astronomy and Astrophysics.333: 565.Bibcode:1998A&A...333..565S.
^Van Genderen, A. M.; Sterken, C. (1999). "Light variations of massive stars (alpha Cygni variables). XVII. The LMC supergiants R 74 (LBV), R 78, HD 34664 = S 22 (B[e]/LBV), R 84 and R 116 (LBV?)".Astronomy and Astrophysics.349: 537.Bibcode:1999A&A...349..537V.
^abcdefghijklmnopqrsSkiff, B. A. (2014). "VizieR Online Data Catalog: Catalogue of Stellar Spectral Classifications (Skiff, 2009-2016)".VizieR On-line Data Catalog: B/Mk. Originally Published in: Lowell Observatory (October 2014).1: B/mk.Bibcode:2014yCat....1.2023S.
^Maíz Apellániz, J.; Negueruela, I. (30 July 2024). "Barbá 2: A new supergiant-rich Galactic stellar cluster".arXiv:2407.20812v2 [astro-ph.GA].
^abVan Genderen, A. M.; Jones, A.; Sterken, C. (2006). "Light variations of alpha Cygni variables in the Magellanic Clouds".The Journal of Astronomical Data.12: 4.Bibcode:2006JAD....12....4V.
^Wolf, B.; Kaufer, A.; Rivinius, T.; Stahl, O.; Szeifert, T.; Tubbesing, S.; Schmid, H. M. (2000). "Spectroscopic Monitoring of Luminous Hot Stars of the Magellanic Clouds".Thermal and Ionization Aspects of Flows from Hot Stars.204: 43.Bibcode:2000ASPC..204...43W.
^Stolovy, S. R.; Cotera, A.; Dong, H.; Morris, M. R.; Wang, Q. D.; Stolovy, S. R.; Lang, C. (2010). "Isolated Wolf-Rayet Stars and O Supergiants in the GalacticCenter Region Identified via Paschen-a Excess".The Astrophysical Journal.725 (1):188–199.arXiv:1009.2769.Bibcode:2010ApJ...725..188M.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/188.S2CID20968628.
^Lagadec, E.; Zijlstra, A. A.; Oudmaijer, R. D.; Verhoelst, T.; Cox, N. L. J.; Szczerba, R.; Mékarnia, D.; Van Winckel, H. (2011). "A double detached shell around a post-red supergiant: IRAS 17163-3907, the Fried Egg nebula".Astronomy & Astrophysics.534: L10.arXiv:1109.5947.Bibcode:2011A&A...534L..10L.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117521.S2CID55754316.
^Keenan, P. C.; Pitts, R. E. (1980). "Revised MK spectral types for G, K, and M stars".The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.42: 541.Bibcode:1980ApJS...42..541K.doi:10.1086/190662.
^Britavskiy, N. E.; Bonanos, A. Z.; Herrero, A.; Cerviño, M.; García-Álvarez, D.; Boyer, M. L.; Masseron, T.; Mehner, A.; McQuinn, K. B. W. (2019). "Physical parameters of red supergiants in dwarf irregular galaxies in the Local Group".Astronomy & Astrophysics.631: A95.arXiv:1909.13378.Bibcode:2019A&A...631A..95B.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935212.S2CID203593402.
^Munoz-Sanchez, G.; et al. (28 November 2024). "The dramatic transition of the extreme Red Supergiant WOH G64 to a Yellow Hypergiant".arXiv:2411.19329 [astro-ph.SR].
