Inscience andengineering,hydraulic conductivity (K, inSI units ofmeters per second), is a property ofporous materials,soils androcks, that describes the ease with which afluid (usually water) can move through thepore space, or fracture network.[1] It depends on theintrinsic permeability (k, unit: m2) of the material, the degree ofsaturation, and on thedensity andviscosity of the fluid. Saturated hydraulic conductivity,Ksat, describes water movement through saturated media.By definition, hydraulic conductivity is the ratio of volume flux tohydraulic gradient yielding a quantitative measure of a saturated soil's ability to transmit water when subjected to a hydraulic gradient.
There are two broad approaches for determining hydraulic conductivity:
The experimental approach is broadly classified into:
The small-scale field tests are further subdivided into:
The methods of determining hydraulic conductivity and other hydraulic properties are investigated by numerous researchers and include additional empirical approaches.[2]
Allen Hazen derived anempirical formula for approximating hydraulic conductivity from grain-size analyses:
where
Apedotransfer function (PTF) is a specialized empirical estimation method, used primarily in thesoil sciences, but increasingly used in hydrogeology.[3] There are many different PTF methods, however, they all attempt to determine soil properties, such as hydraulic conductivity, given several measured soil properties, such as soilparticle size, andbulk density.
There are relatively simple and inexpensive laboratory tests that may be run to determine the hydraulic conductivity of a soil: constant-head method and falling-head method.
Theconstant-head method is typically used on granular soil. This procedure allows water to move through the soil under a steady state head condition while the volume of water flowing through the soil specimen is measured over a period of time. By knowing the volumeΔV of water measured in a timeΔt, over a specimen of lengthL and cross-sectional areaA, as well as the headh, the hydraulic conductivity (K) can be derived by simply rearrangingDarcy's law:
Proof:Darcy's law states that the volumetric flow depends on thepressure differentialΔP between the two sides of the sample, thepermeabilityk and thedynamic viscosityμ as:[4]
In a constant head experiment, the head (difference between two heights) defines an excess water mass,ρAh, whereρ is the density of water. This mass weighs down on the side it is on, creating a pressure differential ofΔP =ρgh, whereg is the gravitational acceleration.Plugging this directly into the above gives
If the hydraulic conductivity is defined to be related to the hydraulic permeability as
this gives the result.
In the falling-head method, the soil sample is first saturated under a specific head condition. The water is then allowed to flow through the soil without adding any water, so the pressure head declines as water passes through the specimen. The advantage to the falling-head method is that it can be used for both fine-grained and coarse-grained soils..[5] If the head drops fromhi tohf in a timeΔt, then the hydraulic conductivity is equal to
Proof: As above, Darcy's law reads
The decrease in volume is related to the falling head byΔV = ΔhA.Plugging this relationship into the above, and taking the limit asΔt → 0, the differential equation
has the solution
Plugging in and rearranging gives the result.
In compare to laboratory method, field methods gives the most reliable information about the permeability of soil with minimum disturbances. In laboratory methods, the degree of disturbances affect the reliability of value of permeability of the soil.
Pumping test is the most reliable method to calculate the coefficient of permeability of a soil. This test is further classified into Pumping in test and pumping out test.
There are also in-situ methods for measuring the hydraulic conductivity in the field.
When the water table is shallow, the augerhole method, aslug test, can be used for determining the hydraulic conductivity below the water table.
The method was developed by Hooghoudt (1934)[6] in The Netherlands and introduced in the US by Van Bavel en Kirkham (1948).[7]
The method uses the following steps:
where:
where:
The picture shows a large variation ofK-values measured with the augerhole method in an area of 100 ha.[9] The ratio between the highest and lowest values is 25. The cumulative frequency distribution islognormal
The transmissivity is a measure of how much water can be transmitted horizontally, such as to a pumping well.
Anaquifer may consist ofn soil layers. The transmissivityTi of a horizontal flow for theith soil layer with asaturated thicknessdi and horizontal hydraulic conductivityKi is:
Transmissivity is directly proportional to horizontal hydraulic conductivityKi and thicknessdi. ExpressingKi in m/day anddi in m, the transmissivityTi is found in units m2/day.
The total transmissivityTt of the aquifer is the sum of every layer's transmissivity:[8]
Theapparent horizontal hydraulic conductivityKA of the aquifer is:
whereDt, the total thickness of the aquifer, is the sum of each layer's individual thickness:
The transmissivity of an aquifer can be determined frompumping tests.[10]
Influence of the water table
When a soil layer is above thewater table, it is not saturated and does not contribute to the transmissivity. When the soil layer is entirely below the water table, its saturated thickness corresponds to the thickness of the soil layer itself. When the water table is inside a soil layer, the saturated thickness corresponds to the distance of the water table to the bottom of the layer. As the water table may behave dynamically, this thickness may change from place to place or from time to time, so that the transmissivity may vary accordingly.
In a semi-confined aquifer, the water table is found within a soil layer with a negligibly small transmissivity, so that changes of the total transmissivity (Dt) resulting from changes in the level of the water table are negligibly small.
When pumping water from an unconfined aquifer, where the water table is inside a soil layer with a significant transmissivity, the water table may be drawn down whereby the transmissivity reduces and the flow of water to the well diminishes.
Theresistance to vertical flow (Ri) of theith soil layer with asaturated thicknessdi and vertical hydraulic conductivityKvi is:
ExpressingKvi in m/day anddi in m, the resistance (Ri) is expressed in days.
The total resistance (Rt) of the aquifer is the sum of each layer's resistance:[8]
Theapparent vertical hydraulic conductivity (KvA) of the aquifer is:
whereDt is the total thickness of the aquifer:
The resistance plays a role inaquifers where a sequence of layers occurs with varying horizontal permeability so that horizontal flow is found mainly in the layers with high horizontal permeability while the layers with low horizontal permeability transmit the water mainly in a vertical sense.
When the horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity ( and) of the soil layer differ considerably, the layer is said to beanisotropic with respect to hydraulic conductivity.
When theapparent horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity ( and) differ considerably, theaquifer is said to beanisotropic with respect to hydraulic conductivity.
An aquifer is calledsemi-confined when a saturated layer with a relatively small horizontal hydraulic conductivity (the semi-confining layer oraquitard) overlies a layer with a relatively high horizontal hydraulic conductivity so that the flow of groundwater in the first layer is mainly vertical and in the second layer mainly horizontal.
The resistance of a semi-confining top layer of an aquifer can be determined frompumping tests.[10]
When calculating flow todrains[11] or to awell field[12] in an aquifer with the aim tocontrol the water table, the anisotropy is to be taken into account, otherwise the result may be erroneous.
Because of their high porosity and permeability,sand andgravelaquifers have higher hydraulic conductivity thanclay or unfracturedgranite aquifers. Sand or gravel aquifers would thus be easier to extract water from (e.g., using a pumpingwell) because of their high transmissivity, compared to clay or unfractured bedrock aquifers.
Hydraulic conductivity has units with dimensions of length per time (e.g., m/s, ft/day and (gal/day)/ft2 ); transmissivity then has units with dimensions of length squared per time. The following table gives some typical ranges (illustrating the many orders of magnitude which are likely) forK values.
Hydraulic conductivity (K) is one of the most complex and important of the properties of aquifers in hydrogeology as the values found in nature:
Table of saturated hydraulic conductivity (K) values found in nature

Values are for typical freshgroundwater conditions — using standard values ofviscosity andspecific gravity for water at 20 °C and 1 atm.See the similar table derived from the same source forintrinsic permeability values.[13]
| K (cm/s) | 10² | 101 | 100=1 | 10−1 | 10−2 | 10−3 | 10−4 | 10−5 | 10−6 | 10−7 | 10−8 | 10−9 | 10−10 |
| K (ft/day) | 105 | 10,000 | 1,000 | 100 | 10 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.0001 | 10−5 | 10−6 | 10−7 |
| Relative Permeability | Pervious | Semi-Pervious | Impervious | ||||||||||
| Aquifer | Good | Poor | None | ||||||||||
| UnconsolidatedSand &Gravel | Well Sorted Gravel | Well Sorted Sand or Sand & Gravel | Very Fine Sand, Silt,Loess,Loam | ||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Clay & Organic | Peat | LayeredClay | Fat / Unweathered Clay | ||||||||||
| Consolidated Rocks | Highly Fractured Rocks | Oil Reservoir Rocks | FreshSandstone | FreshLimestone,Dolomite | FreshGranite | ||||||||
Source: modified from Bear, 1972
| Soil Type | Liquid Limit, LL (%) | Void Ratio at Liquid Limit, (%) | Hydraulic conductivity, cm/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bentonite | 330 | 9.24 | 1,28 |
| Bentonite sand | 215 | 5,91 | 2,65 |
| Natural marine soil | 106 | 2,798 | 2,56 |
| Air-dried marine soil | 84 | 2,234 | 2,42 |
| Open-dried marine soil | 60 | 1,644 | 2,63 |
| Brown soil | 62 | 1,674 | 2,83 |
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)