 | This article needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(July 2018) |
In 2009,Papua New Guinea was a source, destination, and transit country for men, women, and children subjected totrafficking in persons, specificallyforced prostitution andforced labor. Women and children were subjected tocommercial sexual exploitation andinvoluntary domestic servitude; trafficked men were forced to provide labor in logging and mining camps. Children, especially young girls from tribal areas, were most vulnerable to being pushed intocommercial sexual exploitation or forced labor by members of their immediate family or tribe. Families traditionally sold girls intoforced marriages to settle theirdebts, leaving them vulnerable to involuntary domestic servitude, and tribal leaders trade the exploitative labor and service of girls and women for guns and political advantage. Young girlssold into marriage were often forced into domestic servitude for the husband's extended family. In more urban areas, some children from poorer families were prostituted by their parents or sold tobrothels.Migrant women and teenage girls fromMalaysia,Thailand,China, and thePhilippines were subjected to forcedprostitution, and men from China were transported to the country for forced labor.[1]
In 2009, Asiancrime rings, foreign logging companies, and foreign businessmen arranged for some women to voluntarily enter Papua New Guinea with fraudulently issued tourist or businessvisas. Subsequent to their arrival, thesmugglers turned many of the women over to traffickers who transport them to logging and mining camps, fisheries, and entertainment sites where they are exploited in forced prostitution and involuntary domestic servitude. Foreign and local men are exploited for labor at mines and logging camps, where some receive almost no pay and are compelled to continue working for the company indefinitely throughdebt bondage schemes. Employers fostered workers’ greater indebtedness to the company by paying the workers sub-standard wages while charging them artificially inflated prices at thecompany store; the employees’ only option becomes to buy food and other necessities on credit. Government officials facilitated trafficking by accepting bribes to allowillegal immigrants to enter the country or to ignore victims forced into prostitution or labor, by receiving female trafficking victims in return for political favors, and by providing female victims in return for votes.[1]
In 2009, theGovernment of Papua New Guinea did not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking, and is not making significant efforts to do so. Despite the establishment of an interagency anti-trafficking committee, initial efforts to address forcedchild labor, and new programs to educate the public about trafficking, the government did not investigate any suspected trafficking offenses, prosecute or convict any trafficking offenders under the existinglaw of Papua New Guinea, or address allegations of officials complicit in human trafficking crimes.[1]
TheU.S. State Department'sOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons placed the country in"Tier 2 Watchlist" in 2017.[2] By 2023, it was moved to Tier 3.[3]
The Government ofPapua New Guinea showed negligible progress in its anti-traffickinglaw enforcement efforts during the year. No trafficking offenders were arrested or prosecuted during the year. Papua New Guinea does not have a comprehensive anti-trafficking law, and thepenal code does not prohibit all forms of trafficking. Its criminal code does not specifically prohibit the trafficking of adults, but prohibits trafficking of children for commercialsexual exploitation andslavery. Penalties prescribed for trafficking children of up to life imprisonment are sufficiently stringent and commensurate with penalties prescribed for other serious crimes, such asrape. TheCriminal Code prescribes various penalties for the forced prostitution of women. Low fines or sentences of up to two years’ imprisonment for these offenses, including holding a woman in abrothel against her will, are not sufficiently stringent. Prescribed penalties of up to seven years’ imprisonment for perpetrators who usefraud, violence, threats,abuse of authority, or drugs to procure a person for purposes of forced prostitution are sufficiently stringent and commensurate with penalties prescribed for other serious crimes.Labor laws prohibit forced labor and fraudulent employment recruiting. Prescribed penalties of up to two years’ imprisonment are not sufficiently stringent. The government showed no signs of investigating suspected trafficking offenses or prosecuting trafficking offenders. The Ministry of Justice continued to deliberate on a comprehensive anti-trafficking law, which will include implementation and monitoring guidance. Trafficking-related crimes in rural areas were referred to village courts, which administeredcustomary law rather than criminal law, and resolved cases throughrestitution paid to the victim rather than criminal penalties assigned to the trafficking offender. Wealthy business people, politicians, andpolice officials who benefit financially from the operation ofcommercial sex establishments where trafficking victims are reportedly exploited were notprosecuted. Most law enforcement offices and government offices remained weak as the result ofcorruption,cronyism, a lack of accountability, and a promotion system based onpatronage.[1]
The Government of Papua New Guinea maintained minimal efforts to protect and assist victims of trafficking during the reporting period. Due to severe resource and capacity constraints, it continued to rely onNGO's to identify and provide most services to potential victims. The government did not proactively identify trafficking victims among vulnerable populations, and did not regularly refer victims to NGO service providers. Potential victims who came to the attention of police could be jailed.Immigration inspectors at ports of entry who suspected foreigners would engage in illegal prostitution denied them entry without first determining whether they might be victims of sex trafficking. Officials informally referred crime victims to appropriate service providers, who reported that some of these appear to be victims of trafficking. The government contributed some funds to a shelter for victims of domestic violence in Port Moresby run by an NGO, which could provide shelter and legal aid to trafficking victims, although it did not knowingly do so during the year. The Public Solicitor's office could provide free legal advice and representation to victims.Women's shelters in Port Moresby and Lae could also house foreign and local victims. The Department of Health, with NGO assistance, continued to set up support centers in hospitals throughout the country to provide trafficking victims with counseling and short-termmedical care. Survivors of internal trafficking often received customary compensation payments from the offender and were reluctant to notify police or bring additionalcriminal charges against their traffickers.[1]
During the past year, the Papua New Guinean government made few efforts of its own to prevent trafficking during the reporting period. The government did, however, sustain partnerships with international organizations and NGOs to raise public awareness. The Constitutional Law Reform Commission (CLRC) took the lead in coordinating and communicating on trafficking issues, and established an inter-agency Anti-Trafficking Committee that included foreign government and NGO members. In partnership with IOM, the CLRC conducted the first National Human Trafficking and Smuggling Conference in March 2009, involving over 120 participants from both the government and NGO groups. Participants produced a resolution to ratify the2000 UN TIP Protocol and harmonize the country's laws with bilateral law enforcement cooperation agreements already forged with surrounding countries. The Department of Labor addressed issues of child labor trafficking in partnership with theInternational Labour Organization as part of the TACKLE Project, and became a partner in the Government of Australia's efforts to prevent the labor trafficking of migrant workers from Papua New Guinea through the Pacific Seasonal Worker Pilot Scheme. Officials took steps to reduce the demand forcommercial sex acts through public awareness campaigns against prostitution, the proliferation ofpornographic material, and the country's growingHIV/AIDS epidemic. Papua New Guinea is not a party to the 2000 UN TIP Protocol.[1]
In 2024, the US government reported that the authorities of Papua New Guinea were not fully completing the minumum required actions against human trafficking, were not reporting any investigations or convictions related to it, and were even deporting possible trafficking victims without screening them for trafficking signs; thus Papua New Guinea remains listed as "tier 3".[4]
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.