 | This article needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(November 2020) |
| Country | ESA |
|---|---|
| Contract award | EADS,German Aerospace Center |
| Status | Canceled |
Hopper was a proposedEuropean Space Agency (ESA) orbitalspaceplane andreusable launch vehicle. The Hopper was aFESTIP (Future European Space Transportation Investigations Programme) system study design.[1]
Hopper was one of several proposals for areusable launch vehicle (RLV) developed by the ESA. The proposed reusable launch vehicles were to be used for the inexpensive delivery ofsatellite payloads into orbit as early as 2015.[2] A prototype of Hopper, known as (EADS)Phoenix, was a German-led European project which involved the construction and testing of a one-seventh scale model of the proposed Hopper. On 8 May 2004, a single test flight of the Phoenix was conducted at theNorth European Aerospace Test range in Kiruna,Sweden, which was followed by more tests later that month.[3]
From the 1980s onwards, there was growing international interest in the development of reusable spacecraft; at the time, only thesuperpowers of the era, theSoviet Union and theUnited States, had developed this capability.[4] European nations such as theUnited Kingdom andFrance embarked on their own national programs to produce spaceplanes, such asHOTOL andHermes, while attempting to attract the backing of the multinationalEuropean Space Agency (ESA). While these programs ultimately did not garner enough support to continue development, there was still demand within a number of the ESA's member states to pursue the development of reusable space vehicles.[4] During the 1990s, in addition to the development and operation of several technology demonstrator programs, such as theAtmospheric Reentry Demonstrator (ARD), the ESA were also working on the production of a long-term framework for the eventual development of a viable reusable spacecraft, known as theFuture Launchers Preparatory Programme (FLPP).[5]
Under FLPP, the ESA and European industrial partners performed detailed investigations of several partially-reusable launch vehicle concepts; the aim of the program was to prepare a suitable vehicle to, upon a favorable decision by the ESA's member-nations, proceed with the production of a Next Generation Launcher (NGL).[5] A total of four launch concepts were studied: the Horizontal Take-Off (HTO) Hopper, the Vertical Take-Off (VTO) Hopper, the Reusable First Stage (RFS), and theliquid fly-back booster. Each of these concept vehicles consisted of a reusable wingedbooster, which was paired with an expendable upper stage, to deliver a payload ingeostationary transfer orbit.[5]
The HTO Hopper variant was designed for horizontal take-off, the first portion of which was to be achieved via arocket sled arrangement.[5] It possessed a relatively conventional wing-body configuration, although one atypical feature was the nose of the spacecraft, which possessed a deliberately lowcamber so that the required size of theelevons for desiredtrim functionality could be reduced while also resulting in an improved internal structure, such as in the accommodation of thenose gear.[5] Aerodynamically, the HTO Hopper configuration features a roundeddeltaplanform wing at a 60-degreeleading edge sweep, which was matched with a centralvertical stabilizer and a flat-bottomed underside for the purpose of maximizing the spacecraft's performance duringhypersonic flight.[5]
The alternative VTO Hopper variant was designed for vertical take-off, being launched conventionally via anexpendable launch system.[6] It featured a relatively traditional slendermissile-like body but differed in the presence of a small delta wing at a 45-degree leading edge sweep and a central vertical stabilizer arrangement. In terms of its structure, the VTO Hopper possessed a circular cross section complete with a loft fillet on the underside of the craft which functioned to accommodate both the wings and body flap; it also featured a booster which was designed to carry the payload upon the nose of the fuselage.[6] Studies determined that both the HTO and the VTO variant concepts possessed a relatively similar reentry load environment.[7]
The HTO Hopper was adopted for further development work under another ESA initiative in the form of theFESTIP (Future European Space Transportation Investigations Programme) system design study.[1] During 1998, it was decided that the design of Hopper fulfilled all of the established requirements.[8] At this point, the spacecraft was to be composed of a single-stage reusable vehicle which would not attain orbital velocity itself. Hopper reportedly held the promise of delivering lower cost orbital deployment of payloads.[3] An EADS spokesperson stated that a reusable launch vehicle like Hopper could halve the cost of sending a satellite into orbit, which reportedly had been determined to be aroundUS$15,000 per kilogram of payload in 2004.[2]
The envisioned mission profile of Hopper would have involved several phases. The launch phase was to be achieved by using a 4 kmmagnetic horizontal track, which was to be purpose-built at theGuiana Space Centre inFrench Guiana, that would accelerate the spacecraft up to launch speed.[3][8] Upon reaching an altitude of 130 km, the vehicle would fire an expendablerocket-powered upper stage to attainorbital speed; once it had achieved the necessary height and speed, it would have released itssatellite payload, which would independently ascend higher still to reach the desired orbit.[3] Reportedly, Hopper was designed to deliver 7.5 tonne satellites into an orbit of 130 km above the surface of the Earth.[3] Following the release of its payload, the vehicle would have then glided down in a controller descent. It was intended that the spacecraft would land at a predetermined island facility in theAtlantic Ocean, after which it would have been transported back to French Guiana by ship for further flights.[2][3]
Multinational aerospaceconglomerateEADS was responsible for the project management of Hopper, as well as for the development of the project's software-based elements.[8] A number of other partner companies were also involved in the spacecraft's development. Reportedly, both the ESA and EADS had originally intended to complete development of Hopper between 2015 and 2020.[8] After the first glide test using thePhoenix prototype in May 2004, no further updates on the programme were forthcoming; it is believed that work on Hopper has been discontinued.[citation needed]
ThePhoenix RLV launcher, the prototype of the Hopper launcher, was announced byDASA in June 1999[9] to be developed and produced as a portion of the widerASTRA program of theGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), a€40 million project founded by theGerman Federal Government, EADS'Astrium subsidiary and the state ofBremen. Reportedly, EADS and the state of Bremen invested at least €8.2 million and €4.3 million respectively in the ASTRA programme. A further contribution of €16 million was sourced from partner companies on the program, such as theBremen-basedOHB-System, the DLR and the Federal Ministry for Education and Research. Construction of the prototype began in 2000.[8]
ThePhoenix RLV was 6.9 meters (23 feet) long, had a weight of 1,200 kilograms (2,600 pounds), and a wingspan of 3.9 meters (13 feet). During its design, an emphasis had been placed on minimizingdrag by making the vehicle as small as possible.[8] The fuselage interior was occupied by various avionics and onboard systems, providingnavigation, data transfer, energy supply, andartificial intelligence functions to allow it to automatically perform its data-gathering mission.[3] Phoenix was one-sixth the size of the planned Hopper vehicle.[10] The final version of the vehicle was expected to be able to support the reentry forces and heat, and be able to glide from an altitude of 129 kilometers (80 mi). Integration and system testing works were completed in April 2004.[8]
On Saturday, May 8, 2004, the Phoenix prototype underwent a large-scale drop-test at theNorth European Aerospace Test range inKiruna, Sweden. The vehicle was lifted by helicopter and dropped from a height of 2.4 kilometres (7,900 ft). Following a 90-second guided glide, the prototype reportedly landed with precision and without incident.[11][3] The primary aim of the test was to assess theglider potential of the craft. More specifically, the Phoenix explored various methods of performing automatic landings that would not involve any human intervention; guidance was provided by multiple means of navigation, includingGPS satellites,radar andlaser altimeters, and variouspressure andspeed sensors. According to EADS spokesman Mathias Spude, the prototype had landed within three centimeters of the intended target.[2]
Additional tests had already been scheduled, including three that were planned to occur during the following two weeks, which were to build towards the testing of more challenging landings (involving the spacecraft being dropped from different angles or orientations relative to the landing site).[2] Furthermore, the project had an anticipated milestone of releasing the prototype from an altitude of 25 kilometres (82,000 ft) within three years. However,EADS noted prior to the flight that further tests would be dependent on the craft's performance during the initial flight.[8]
Two further test flights were conducted on May 13 (a repeat of the May 8 drop test) and May 16.[12]
In the long term, if successful and viable, the landing technology tested on Phoenix was to be incorporated into a follow-on re-usable vehicle, which was to be namedSocrates. While not envisioned to serve as an orbital vehicle,Socrates was to be capable of flying at up to 10 times thespeed of sound, as well as of performing very rapid turnaround times between flights as a steppingstone towards re-usability.[2]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Future missions initalics | |||||||||||||||||||||||
