| Holy Crown of Hungary | |
|---|---|
 Front of the Holy Crown | |
| Heraldic depictions | |
 | |
| Details | |
| Country | Hungary |
| Weight | 2,056 grams (72.5 oz) |
| Arches | 4 |
TheHoly Crown of Hungary (Hungarian:Szent Korona[ˈsɛntˈkoronɒ],[note 1]Latin:Sacra Corona), also known as theCrown of Saint Stephen, named in honour of SaintStephen I of Hungary, was thecoronation crown used by theKingdom of Hungary for most of its existence; kings were crowned with it since the twelfth century. The Crown symbolized theKing's authority over theLands of the Hungarian Crown (theCarpathian Basin), and it was a key mark oflegitimacy. Through thehistory of Hungary, more than fifty kings werecrowned with it, with the last beingCharles IV in 1916. The only kings not crowned wereWladyslaw I,[1]John Sigismund Zápolya, andJoseph II.
The enamels on the crown are mainly or entirelyByzantine work, presumed to have been made inConstantinople in the 1070s. The crown was presented by theByzantine EmperorMichael VII Doukas to the KingGéza I of Hungary; both are depicted and named in theGreek language on enamel plaques in the lower crown. However, in popular tradition the Holy Crown was thought to be older and of Papal provenance, dating to the time of the first KingStephen I of Hungary crowned 1000/1001. It is one of two known Byzantine crowns to survive, the other being the slightly earlierMonomachus Crown in theHungarian National Museum,[2][3] which may have had another function. The Holy Crown has probably been remodelled using elements of different origins. The date assigned to the present configuration of the Holy Crown is most commonly put around the late 12th century.[4] TheHungarian coronation regalia consists of the Holy Crown, the sceptre, the orb, and the mantle. The orb has the coat of arms ofCharles I (1310–1342).
The name "Holy Crown" was first used in 1256. By the 14th century it became the unique symbol of royal power. As written by Crown GuardPéter Révay, when Hungary needed a new monarch it did not seek a crown to inaugurate a king, but a king worthy of the Crown. He also said "the Holy Crown is for the Hungarians what theLost Ark is for the Jewish people".[5]
Since 2000, the Holy Crown has been on display in the central Domed Hall of theHungarian Parliament Building.
 | This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
As with all European Christian crowns, the Holy Crown symbolizes a halo signifying the wearer'sdivine right to rule. According to popular tradition,St Stephen I held up the crown before his death (in the year 1038) to consecrate it and his kingdom to theVirgin Mary. After this, Mary was depicted not only aspatrona (patron saint) of theKingdom of Hungary, but also asregina (queen). This consecration was supposed to empower the crown with divine force to help the future kings of Hungary under the "Doctrine of the Holy Crown" (Hungarian:Szentkorona-tan).
Péter Révay, a Crown Guard, expounded this doctrine in his worksCommentarius De Sacra Regni Hungariae Corona (Explanation of the Holy Crown of the Kingdom of Hungary,Augsburg 1613) andDe monarchia et Sacra Corona Regni Hungariae (On the Monarchy and Holy Crown of Hungary,Frankfurt 1659).Under this doctrine, the crown itself is a legal person identical to the state of Hungary. It is superior to the ruling monarch, who rules "in the name of the crown".
| This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
According to the most accepted theory, in the publications of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and theHungarian Catholic Episcopal Conference,[7] the Holy Crown consists of three parts: the lowerabroncs (rim, hoop), thecorona graeca; the upperkeresztpántok (cross straps), thecorona latina; and the uppermost cross, tilted at an angle. It is thought that it was created underByzantine influence during the reign of the Hungarian KingBéla III (1172–1196), who was brought up in the Byzantine court and was briefly heir to the Byzantine throne, or some other events around 1200.[8] This was many decades after thecrowning of Stephen I marked the beginning of Hungarian statehood, variously given as Christmas 1000 or 1 January 1001.
Another version of the origin of the crown was written by bishopHartvik around 1100–1110 at the request of KingKönyves Kálmán, in which the "Pope" sent King Stephen I "his blessings and a crown". According to "Hartvik’s legend", St. Stephen sent ArchbishopAstrik ofEsztergom toRome to acquire a crown from the "Pope", who is not named. Despite Astrik's haste, the envoy ofMieszko I of Poland arrived at Rome first. In a dream, the Pope saw an angel who told him: "There will be another envoy from an unknown folk, who will ask for a crown also. Give them the crown, as they deserve it." The next day Astrik arrived, and the Pope gave the crown to him.
Hartvik’s legend appeared inliturgical books and breviaries in Hungary around 1200, naming the then-existingPope Sylvester II. Subsequently, the story of the crown sent by Sylvester II spread throughout the Christian world, and was published in 1613 by the crown guard Péter Révay.
However, the legend is not supported by historical evidence. Mieszko I did not live at the same time as St. Stephen I or Pope Sylvester II. Also, the "Greater Legend" of St Stephen, written around 1083, makes no mention of the Crown's Roman provenance: "in the fifth year after the death of his father...they brought a Papal letter of blessing...and the Lord’s favoured one, Stephen, was chosen to be king, and was anointed with oil and auspiciously crowned with the diadem of royal honour". Moreover,Vatican archives have found no record of the granting of the crown. Another document giving doubtful evidence is by Thietmar von Merseburg (died 1018): he wrote that Holy Roman EmperorOtto III consented to Stephen's coronation, and that the Pope sent his blessings, but there is no mention of a crown.
The question to what extent the upper part of the Holy Crown belonged to the crown of King Stephen I remained open until 1978, when the coronation insignia was returned to Hungary and a thorough examination was carried out.
The differing styles and techniques used in making the enamel pictures and the fact that the inscriptions on the diadem are in Greek and on the bands in Latin suggest that the two parts were probably made in two different periods. However, there are no known representations in which the crown is separated: the Holy Crown is always shown as one.
The Crown is acoronation crown, which should be worn only on the occasion of a coronation, and for the rest of the time two crown guards (koronaőr) guard it. Apart from this, there are only two other people who can touch it, thenádorispán (the highest secular title), who puts it onto a pillow during the coronation, and theArchbishop of Esztergom (primate of Hungary, the highest ecclesiastical title), who places it on the head of the king.
The Holy Crown was made of gold and decorated with nineteen enamel "pantokrator" pictures (Greek meaning "master of all") as well as semi-precious stones, genuine pearls, andalmandine. It has three parts: "abroncs" (rim, hoop) (corona graeca), "keresztpántok" (cross straps) (corona latina), and the cross on the top tilted at an angle.
There are four hanging pendants (pendilia) dangling from chains on each side of the diadem and one in the back. There is nomonde.
Theabroncs (rim, hoop)corona graeca ("Greek Crown") is 5.2 cm wide with a diameter of 20.5 cm.
The two aquamarine stones with cut surfaces on the back of the diadem were added as replacements byKing Matthias II (1608–1619). The enamel picture on the front depictsChrist Pantokrator. On the rim to the right and left of Jesus are pictures of the archangelsMichael andGabriel, followed by half-length images of the SaintsGeorge andDemetrius, andCosmas and Damian.
In the arched frame on the back of the diademEmperor Michael VII Doukas (1071–1078) is depicted. Below it to the left is the half-length picture of "Kon. Porphyrogennetos", this probably being either Emperor Michael's brother and co-emperorKonstantios Doukas or of his son and heirConstantine Doukas, both having beenborn in the purple. To the right there is a picture of the Hungarian KingGéza I (1074–1077), with theGreek inscription:ΓΕΩΒΙΤΖΑϹ ΠΙΣΤΟϹ ΚΡΑΛΗϹ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑϹ (Geōbitzas pistós králēs Tourkías, meaning "Géza I, faithfulkralj of theland of the Turks").[9][10][11]
The contemporary Byzantine name for the Hungarians was "Turks",[9][12][10] while the Hungarian branch of theEastern Orthodox Church, underConstantinople's jurisdiction, was named the "Metropolitanate of Tourkia" (Hungary), and the head of this church was the "Metropolitan of Tourkia" (Hungary).[11][10] As was customary in the hierarchy of the Byzantine state, clear differentiation is made between style of the emperors and that of the Hungarian king by using a hellenized form of the common South Slavic word for "king" (Kralj) for Géza. The saints and the Greek rulers havehalos while Géza does not. The inscriptions of the emperors’ names are in red, while the Hungarian king's is in dark blue or black.
The enamel plaques on the circular band, the panel depicting Christ Pantokrator, and the picture of Emperor Michael were all affixed to the crown using different techniques. The picture of the emperor could not be attached to the rim in the same way as the Pantokrator picture on the front. The frame was folded upwards and the picture of the emperor was nailed to the edge. We can thus conclude that the picture of Michael VII was not originally designed for this crown, but was probably used first somewhere else.
Thecorona graeca with its pointed and arched plaques is identical to the form of the crowns of the Byzantine empresses[note 2] – in other words it was a woman's crown. It was given by Emperor Michael Dukas VII to King Géza's wife, known only asSynadene, around 1075. The gift was not a new crown, but rather an old crown designed for a woman that had to be selected from the Emperor's treasury and remodelled. The enamel pictures that become outdated were removed, since either represented earlier historical figures or were not appropriate for the Hungarian queen according to court protocol. It was in this form that the crown was sent toHungary.
There is another view that the Géza depicted on thecorona graeca is not King Géza I butSt Stephen's father.[13] This view is confirmed by the fact that Grand Prince Géza is depicted on thecorona gracea without a crown, although carrying a royal sceptre.[14]
Thekeresztpántos (cross straps)corona latina ("Latin Crown") is made of four 5.2-cm-wide gold strips welded to the edge of a square central panel (7.2 × 7.2 cm); the strips are usually assumed to have been originally made for some other object, and adapted for the crown. It is not an independent object, as it has no function alone. It was designed to be attached to the top rim of thecorona graeca and provides a dome-shaped top.
The inscription on the pictures of the saints and the style of their lettering suggest the date when they were made. Amidst the antique-style capital letters, the T in Thomas and the second U in Paulus are formed in the style characteristic of the Latin letters used on Byzantine coins, a practice abandoned in the middle of the 11th century. They may have decorated a reliquary box or a portable altar given to István I by the pope, or possibly thetreasure binding of a book. It is also possible, although it cannot be verified, that István I received a crown as a gift from one of the popes, reciprocating his – historically documented – gifts. The picture of the apostles (Peter, Paul, James, John, Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Thomas), however, based on their style, cannot be dated to around 1000. It is considered to be ofRomanesque style, and created by Roman workshop in the middle of the 11th century.[8]
The intersecting bands are edged with beaded gold wire that close off the lower end of the bands and finish off the system of decoration. There are twelve pearls on the central panel and a total of seventy-two altogether on thecorona latina, symbolising the number of Christ's disciples (Acts 10.1).
The central panel is decorated with a square cloisonné enamel picture depicting Christ Pantokrator. Each band has two (altogether eight) pictures of standing apostles identical to the first eight listed in Acts 1.13.
Éva Kovács and Zsuzsa Lovag suggested that thecorona latina was originally a large Byzantineliturgical asterisk from a Greek monastery in Hungary.[15] In order to get it to fit into its new role the apostles at the bottom of each of the four arms of this asterisk were cut off before it was very crudely attached to the inside of thecorona graeca to transform this Byzantine open crown into a closed crown (i.e., the type of crown proper to the autocrat, the senior emperor or monarch in Byzantine imperial protocol) and to provide a base for the reliquary cross at its summit (see§ Cross).[citation needed]
Recently, Croatian archaeologists M. Ilkić and D. Filipčić proposed thesis that thecrown of Zvonimir, the last native Croatian king and which was once believed to have disappeared, is actually thecorona latina, as "the only plausible place where Zvonimir's crown could end up, while maintaining the legitimacy of the coronation of new Hungarian-Croatian kings and respecting the tradition and legality of the coronation of Béla IV's predecessors, is within the Hungarian crown".[8] However, was soon disputed by the Croatian historian Mladen Ančić.[16][17]
The cross is attached to the crown in a rough manner, rising from the midriff of Christ in the central enamel plaque at the top of the crown. This addition might have been made during the 16th century.[citation needed] The cross was knocked crooked during the 17th century when the crown was damaged, possibly by the top of the iron chest housing the insignia being hastily closed without the crown having been placed in it properly.[18] The cross has since been left in this slanted position, and is now typically depicted as such.
Éva Kovács suggests that the present plain cross on the top of the crown is a replacement of an original double-barred reliquary cross containing three pieces of theTrue Cross and that it was the presence of the True Cross in the Holy Crown which made it holy. She states that “Szabolcs Vajay called to my attention a strange incident in the crown’s history which had completely escaped everybody’s attention. Before QueenIsabella handed over the regalia toFerdinand in 1551, she broke the cross off the crown’s peak for her son, John Sigismund. According to a contemporary Polish chronicler, John Sigismund wore this cross on his chest till the end of his life, "... because he who possesses this cross will again come into possession of the missing parts which, subjected to the power of the cross, had belonged to it".[This quote needs a citation]
Later, the cross became the property of Sigismund Bathory who, persuaded by his confessor, bestowed it on Emperor Rudolf II. This was reported by an Italian envoy in Prague who also told the Isabella-John Sigismund story.” She also notes that “Several small fragments of the True Cross were in possession of the Arpad dynasty. As a point of interest, it is precisely the smallest ones, those set into the cross on the chest, that are attributed to St. Stephen. About a tiny fragment of the True Cross, a Russian chronicler recording King Geza II’s campaigns wrote that it had been the holy king’s property and, despite its small size, it was a relic of great force. We are, perhaps, not off the track when surmising that the Hungarian crown was holy because it had once been reinforced with a fragment of the victory-bringing relic. . . . we know quite few reliquary crowns. To mention but the most obvious example, let us cite Charles I’s crown provided with a cross containing a thorn relic.”[15]
Later, it was the Crown itself, rather than the St. Stephen's cross reliquary that came to be regarded as holy through its traditional association with St. Stephen. Éva Kovács further notes in this regard the early use of the patriarchal or double-barred cross and crown in the ancient Hungarian royal coat of arms. Since reliquary crosses frequently take such a double-barred form, the use of a patriarchal cross in the royal arms would be a direct reference to and representation of this royal relic. This association between the crown and this royal relic would also help to substantiate the theory that the Holy Crown was always intended to serve its historical role of legitimatizing the position of its wearer as the true divinely appointed king of Hungary.[citation needed]
The form of the Holy Crown is identical to that of thekamelaukion-type crowns with closed tops, as introduced in the Byzantine Empire. The presence of multiple pictures is also typical of Byzantine crowns. When the intersecting bands were added to thecorona graeca during the rule of Béla III, who had been brought up in Constantinople, the bands were decorated just as thecorona graeca was, perhaps with the intention of imitating the Byzantine pattern.
Beside the using of the intersecting bands of thecorona latina, which probably came from the treasury of St. István, at the time of the creation of the crown there existed further expectation that the coronation insignia would eventually include additional gold works that could be linked to the first, beatified Hungarian king, István.
The inscription embroidered onto thecoronation mantle indicates with all certainty that István I and Queen Gizella had it made in 1031.
Thecoronation sceptre with the orb at the end can also be dated to the time of St István. On the seals ofHenry II, Holy Roman Emperor, andRudolph III of Burgundy, the rulers are holding identically shaped sceptres. Such short-staffed sceptres ending in orbs were not in use as insignia earlier or later.
After the fall of theHungarian People's Republic, the crown was reincorporated into thenational coat of arms in 1990. The National Assembly chose the pre-war coat of arms over the crown-lessKossuth arms of 1849.
The Holy Crown has had a varied history; having been stolen, hidden, lost, recovered, and taken abroad several times. During theÁrpád dynasty (1000–1301), the coronation insignia was kept in the coronation city ofSzékesfehérvár. Later, the crown was housed in one of three locations:Visegrád (inPest county);Pozsony (present-day Bratislava, Slovakia); orBuda. In 1805–1806 the Crown was kept for about three months in thePalanok Castle atMunkács (now Mukachevo, Ukraine).Lajos Kossuth took the crown and the coronation jewels with him after the collapse of theHungarian Revolution of 1848 and buried them in a wooden box in a willow forest, near Orsova inTransylvania (todayOrşova,Romania). They were subsequently dug up and returned to the royal castle in Buda in 1853.
At the end of theSecond World War thecrown jewels were recovered inMattsee, Austria, on 4 May 1945 by theU.S. 86th Infantry Division.[19] The crown jewels were transported to Western Europe and eventually given to theUnited States Army by theHungarian Crown Guard for safekeeping from theSoviet Union.[20] For much of theCold War the crown was held at theUnited States Bullion Depository (Fort Knox,Kentucky) alongside the bulk of the United States' gold reserves and other priceless historical items. After undergoing extensive historical research to verify the crown as genuine, it was returned to the people of Hungary by order of U.S. PresidentJimmy Carter on 6 January 1978.[21]
Most current academic knowledge about Hungarian royal garments originates from this modern research. Following substantial U.S. political debate, the agreement to return the jewels contained many conditions to ensure the people of Hungary, rather than its Communist government, took possession of the jewels.[21] The majority of the Hungarian-American population opposed the decision to return the crown.[22] On January 6, 1978, US Secretary of StateCyrus Vance returned the Crown to Hungary in Budapest.[23]
Uniquely in Europe, most of the medieval ensemble ofcoronation regalia has survived. On 1 January 2000, the Holy Crown of Hungary was moved to theHungarian Parliament Building from theHungarian National Museum. Thesceptre,orb and the coronation sword were also moved to the Parliament.
The very largecoronationmantle remains in a glassinert gas vault at the National Museum due to its delicate, faint condition. Unlike the crown and accompanying insignia, the originally red coloured mantle is considered to date back to Stephen I, and was made circa 1030. Old records describe the robe as handiwork of the queen and hersisters and the mantle's middle back bears the king's only known portrait (which shows his crown was not the currently existing one). A circular inscription sewn in Latin identifies the coat as a bishop'schasuble.
The sceptre is considered the artistically most valuable piece of the Hungarian royal inventory. It contains a solidrock crystal ball decorated with engraved lions, a rare product of the 10th-centuryFatimid caliphate. Its handle contains a wooden rod surrounded by very fine wrought silver ornaments.
The orb is unusual in having apatriarchal cross instead of a simple cross, as on the crown.
The ceremonial straight sword kept in the Holy Crown collection is a 14th-century Italian product. However, what is said to be an original coronation sword of Stephen I has been inPrague'sSt. Vitus Cathedral since 1368.[24]
Alance claimed to have belonged to King Stephen I, and seen in the Mantle portrait, was reportedly obtained by theHoly Roman Emperor circa 1100.
| International | |
|---|---|
| Other | |
