| This article is part ofa series on |
| Banking in the United States |
|---|
Lending |
Thishistory of central banking in the United States encompasses variousbank regulations, from earlywildcat banking practices through the presentFederal Reserve System.
SomeFounding Fathers were strongly opposed to the formation of a national banking system. Russell Lee Norburn said the fundamental cause of theAmerican Revolutionary War was conservativeBank of England policies failing to supply the colonies with money.[1]
Others were strongly in favor of a national bank.Robert Morris, as Superintendent of Finance, helped to open theBank of North America in 1782, and has been accordingly called byThomas Goddard "the father of the system of credit and paper circulation in the United States".[2] As ratification in early 1781 of theArticles of Confederation had extended toCongress the sovereign power to generatebills of credit, it passed later that year an ordinance to incorporate a privately subscribed national bank following in the footsteps of the Bank of England. However, it was thwarted in fulfilling its intended role as a nationwide national bank due to objections of "alarming foreign influence and fictitious credit",[2] favoritism to foreigners and unfair policies against less corrupt state banks issuing their own notes, such that Pennsylvania's legislature repealed its charter to operate within the Commonwealth in 1785.
In 1791, former Morris aide and chief advocate for Northern mercantile interests,Alexander Hamilton, theSecretary of the Treasury, accepted acompromise with the Southern lawmakers to ensure the continuation of Morris's Bank project; in exchange for support by the South for a national bank, Hamilton agreed to ensure sufficient support to have the national or federal capitol moved from its temporaryNorthern location,New York, to a "Southern" location on thePotomac. As a result, theFirst Bank of the United States (1791–1811) was chartered by Congress within the year and signed byGeorge Washington soon after. The First Bank of the United States was modeled after theBank of England and differed in many ways from today'scentral banks. For example, it was partly owned by foreigners, who shared in its profits. Also, it was not solely responsible for the country's supply ofbank notes. It was responsible for only 20% of the currency supply; state banks accounted for the rest. Several founding fathers bitterly opposed the bank.Thomas Jefferson saw it as an engine for speculation, financial manipulation, and corruption.[3] In 1811 its twenty-year charter expired and was not renewed by Congress. Absent the federally chartered bank, the next several years witnessed a proliferation of federally issuedTreasury Notes to create credit as the government struggled to finance theWar of 1812; a suspension ofspecie payment by most banks soon followed as well.
After five years, the federal government chartered its successor, theSecond Bank of the United States (1816–1836).James Madison signed the charter with the intention of stopping runaway inflation that had plagued the country during the five-year interim. It was essentially a copy of the First Bank, with branches across the country.Andrew Jackson, who became president in 1829, denounced the bank as an engine of corruption. His destruction of the bank was a major political issue in the 1830s and shaped theSecond Party System, as Democrats in the states opposed banks andWhigs supported them. He was unable to get the bank dissolved, but refused to renew its charter. Jackson attempted to counteract this by executive order requiring all federal land payments to be made in gold or silver, in accordance with his interpretation ofThe Constitution of the United States, which only gives Congress the power to "coin" money, not emit bills of credit.[4] ThePanic of 1837 followed. The bank then flatly denied a subpoena to examine its records and its chief,Nicholas Biddle, bemusedly observed that it would be ironic if he went to prison "By the votes of members of Congress because I would not give up to their enemies their confidential letters".[5] Biddle was eventually arrested and charged with fraud. The bank's charter expired in 1836.
| Period | % change in money supply | % change in price level |
|---|---|---|
| 1832–37 | +61 | +28 |
| 1837–43 | −58 | −35 |
| 1843–48 | +102 | +9 |
| 1848–49 | −11 | 0 |
| 1849–54 | +109 | +32 |
| 1854–55 | −12 | +2 |
| 1855–57 | +18 | +1 |
| 1857–58 | −23 | −16 |
| 1858–61 | +35 | −4 |
In this period, onlystate-chartered banks existed. They could issue bank notes against specie (gold andsilvercoins) and the states heavily regulated their ownreserve requirements,interest rates forloans anddeposits, the necessarycapital ratio etc. These banks had existed since 1781, in parallel with the Banks of the United States. TheMichigan Act (1837) allowed the automatic chartering of banks that would fulfill its requirements without special consent of thestate legislature. This legislation made creating unstable banks easier by lowering state supervision in states that adopted it. The real value of a bank bill was often lower than its face value, and the issuing bank's financial strength generally determined the size of the discount. By 1797 there were 24 chartered banks in the U.S.; with the beginning of thefree banking era (1837) there were 712.
During the free banking era, the banks were short-lived compared to today's commercial banks, with an average lifespan of five years. About half of the banks failed, and about a third of which went out of business because they could not redeem their notes.[6] (See also "Wildcat banking".)
During the free banking era, some local banks took over the functions of a central bank. In New York, theNew York Safety Fund provided deposit insurance for member banks. InBoston, theSuffolk Bank guaranteed that bank notes would trade at near par value, and acted as a private bank noteclearinghouse.[7]
TheNational Banking Act of 1863, besides providing loans in theCivil War effort of theUnion, included provisions:
As described byGresham's law, soon bad money from state banks drove out the new, good money;[9] the government imposed a 10% tax on state bank bills, forcing most banks to convert to national banks. By 1865, there were already 1,500 national banks. In 1870, 1,638 national banks stood against only 325 state banks. The tax led in the 1880s and 1890s to the creation and adoption ofchecking accounts. By the 1890s, 90% of the money supply was in checking accounts. State banking had made a comeback.
Two problems still remained in the banking sector.[10] The first was the requirement to back up the currency with treasuries. When thetreasuries fluctuated in value,banks had to recallloans or borrow from other banks orclearinghouses. The second problem was that the system created seasonal liquidity spikes. A rural bank haddeposit accounts at a larger bank, that it withdrew from when the need for funds was highest, e.g., in the planting season.[11]
These liquidity crises led tobank runs, causing severe disruptions and depressions. ThePanic of 1907 was one of the worst panics in US history.[12] The resulting hearings led to creating alender of last resort.[13]
National banks issuedNational Bank Notes as currency. Because they were uniformly backed by US government debt, they generally traded at comparable values in contrast to the notes issued during the Free Banking era in which notes from different banks could have significantly different values. National bank notes were not however "lawful tender", and could not be used as bank reserves under the National Bank Act. The Federal government issuedgreenbacks which fulfilled this role along with gold.[14]
Congress suspended the gold standard in 1861 early in the Civil War and began issuing paper currency (greenbacks). The federally issued greenbacks were gradually supposed to be eliminated in favor of national bank notes after theSpecie Payment Resumption Act of 1875 was passed. However, the elimination of the greenbacks was suspended in 1878 and the notes remained in circulation. Federal debt throughout the period continued to be paid in gold. In 1879, the United States had returned to thegold standard, and all currency could be redeemed in gold.[15]
Early in 1907, New York Times Annual Financial Review publishedPaul Warburg's (a partner ofKuhn, Loeb and Co.) first official reform plan, entitled "A Plan for a Modified Central Bank", in which he outlined remedies that he thought might avert panics. Early in 1907,Jacob Schiff, thechief executive officer ofKuhn, Loeb and Co., in a speech to theNew York Chamber of Commerce, warned that "unless we have a central bank with adequate control of credit resources, this country is going to undergo the most severe and far reaching money panic in its history."[16] "ThePanic of 1907" hit full stride in October. [Herrick]
Bankers felt the real problem was that the United States was the last major country without a central bank, which might provide stability and emergency credit in times of financial crisis. While segments of the financial community were worried about the power that had accrued toJP Morgan and other financiers, most were more concerned about the general frailty of a vast, decentralized banking system that could not regulate itself without the extraordinary intervention of one man. Financial leaders who advocated a central bank with an elastic currency after thePanic of 1907 includedFrank Vanderlip,Myron T. Herrick,William Barret Ridgely,George E. Roberts,Isaac Newton Seligman andJacob H. Schiff. They stressed the need for an elastic money supply that could expand or contract as needed. After the scare of 1907 the bankers demanded reform; the next year, Congress established a commission of experts to come up with a nonpartisan solution.
Rhode Island SenatorNelson Aldrich, the Republican leader in the Senate, ran the Commission personally, with the aid of a team of economists. They went to Europe and were impressed with how the central banks in Britain and Germany appeared to handle the stabilization of the overall economy and the promotion of international trade. Aldrich's investigation led to his plan in 1912 to bring central banking to the United States, with promises of financial stability, expanded international roles, control by impartial experts and no political meddling in finance. Aldrich asserted that a central bank had to be, paradoxically, decentralized somehow, or it would be attacked by local politicians and bankers as had the First and Second Banks of the United States. The Aldrich plan was introduced in the 62nd and 63rd Congresses (1912 and 1913) but never gained much traction as the Democrats in 1912 won control of both the House and the Senate as well as the White House.
The new president, Woodrow Wilson, then became the principal mover for banking and currency reform in the 63rd Congress, working with the two chairs of the House and Senate Banking and Currency Committees, Rep.Carter Glass of Virginia and Sen. Robert L. Owen of Oklahoma. It was Wilson who insisted that the regional Federal Reserve banks be controlled by a central Federal Reserve Board appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.
William Jennings Bryan, now Secretary of State, long-time enemy of Wall Street and still a power in the Democratic Party, threatened to destroy the bill. Wilson came up with a compromise plan that pleased bankers and Bryan alike. The Bryanites were happy that Federal Reserve currency became liabilities of the government rather than of private banks—a symbolic change—and by provisions for federal loans to farmers. The Bryanite demand to prohibit interlocking directorates did not pass. Wilson convinced the anti-bank Congressmen that because Federal Reserve notes were obligations of the government, the plan fit their demands. Wilson assured southerners and westerners that the system was decentralized into 12 districts, and thus would weaken New York City's Wall Street influence and strengthen the hinterlands. After much debate and many amendments, Congress passed theFederal Reserve Act orGlass–Owen Act, as it was sometimes called at the time, in late 1913. President Wilson signed the Act into law on December 23, 1913.
The Federal Reserve System, also known as the Federal Reserve or simply as the Fed, is the central banking system of the United States today. The Federal Reserve's power developed slowly in part due to an understanding at its creation that it was to function primarily as a reserve, a money-creator of last resort to prevent the downward spiral of withdrawal/withholding of funds which characterizes a monetary panic. At the outbreak ofWorld War I, the Federal Reserve was better positioned than theUnited States Department of the Treasury to issuewar bonds, and so became the primary retailer for war bonds under the direction of the Treasury. After the war, the Federal Reserve, led by Paul Warburg and New York Governor Bank PresidentBenjamin Strong, convinced Congress to modify its powers, giving it the ability to both create money, as the 1913 Act intended, and destroy money, as a central bank could.
During the 1920s, the Federal Reserve experimented with a number of approaches, alternatively creating and then destroying money which, in the eyes ofMilton Friedman, helped create the late-1920sstock market bubble and theGreat Depression.[17]
AfterFranklin D. Roosevelt took office in 1933, the Federal Reserve was subordinated to theExecutive Branch, where it remained until 1951, when the Federal Reserve and the Treasury department signed anaccord granting the Federal Reserve full independence over monetary matters while leaving fiscal matters to the Treasury.
The Federal Reserve's monetary powers did not dramatically change for the rest of the 20th century, but in the 1970s it was specifically charged by Congress to effectively promote "the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates" as well as given regulatory responsibility over many consumer credit protection laws.
Since the2008 financial crisis, central banks globally (including the Federal Reserve) have implemented several experimentalUnconventional Monetary Policy Tools (UMPS) in order to achieve their monetary policy objectives.
Banks portal
{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) | This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(October 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
