Detail of a relief fromPalenque, a Classic-era city.Maya script is the only writing system of the pre-Columbian Americas to be completely known and enabled the beginning ofrecorded history.
A program of centennial festivities of Mexican independence in 1910, asserting the historical continuity ofMiguel Hidalgo,Benito Juárez "Law," andPorfirio Díaz, "Peace"
Thehistory of Mexico spans over three millennia, with the earliest evidence ofhunter-gatherer settlement 13,000 years ago. Central and southern Mexico, known asMesoamerica, saw the rise of complex civilizations that developed glyphic writing systems to record political histories and conquests. TheSpanish conquest of the Aztec Empire in the early 16th century establishedNew Spain, bringing Spanish rule, Christianity, and European influences.
The late 19th-centuryPorfiriato era brought economic growth but also authoritarianism and social inequality, which eventually fueled theMexican Revolution in 1910. The revolution led to significant social and political changes, with the emergence of theInstitutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) as the dominant force. Throughout the 20th century, Mexico implemented land reforms, nationalized key industries, and expanded social welfare, but these achievements were marred by corruption, violence, and economic crises.
In the 1980s and 1990s, Mexico shifted towards privatization and trade liberalization, culminating in the signing of theNorth American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994. The turn of the century marked a significant shift in Mexico's political landscape, with the oppositionNational Action Party (PAN) winning the presidency in 2000, ending the PRI's long-standing dominance and ushering in a new era of Mexican politics. The 21st century has seen economic disparities, drug-related violence, and corruption. Administrations have focused on addressing these issues, with mixed success. The election ofAndrés Manuel López Obrador in 2018 marked another significant shift, as his government has aimed to combat corruption, reduce inequality, and address the violence that has plagued the country for decades.
The Castillo, Chichen Itza, Mexico, ca. 800–900 CEPanel 3 from Cancuen, Guatemala, representing king T'ah 'ak' Cha'an
Large and complex civilizations developed in the center and southern regions of Mexico (with the southern region extending into what is now Central America) in what has come to be known asMesoamerica. The civilizations that rose and declined over millennia were characterized by:[1]
significant urban settlements;
monumental architecture such as temples, palaces, and other monumental architecture, such as theball court;
the division of society into religious and political elites (such as warriors and merchants) and commoners who pursued subsistence agriculture;
transfer of tribute and rendering of labor from commoners to elites;
reliance on agriculture often supplemented by hunting and fishing and the complete absence of a pastoral (herding) economy since there were no domesticated herd animals before the arrival of the Europeans;
trade networks and markets.
The history of Mexico before the Spanish conquest is known through the work ofarchaeologists,epigraphers, and ethnohistorians, who analyzeMesoamerican indigenous manuscripts, particularlyAztec codices,Mayan codices, andMixtec codices. Accounts written by Spaniards at the time of the conquest (theconquistadores) and by Indigenous chroniclers of the postconquest period constitute the principal source of information regarding Mexico at the time of the Spanish Conquest. Few pictorial manuscripts (orcodices) of theMaya,Mixtec, andMexica cultures of thePost-Classic period survive, but progress has been made particularly in the area ofMaya archaeology and epigraphy.[2]
The presence of people inMesoamerica was once thought to date back 40,000 years, an estimate based on what were believed to be ancient footprints discovered in theValley of Mexico. This date may not be accurate after further investigation usingradiocarbon dating.[3] It is currently unclear whether 23,000-year-oldcampfire remains found in the Valley of Mexico are the earliest human remains uncovered so far in Mexico.[4]The first people to settle in Mexico encountered a climate far milder than the current one. In particular, the Valley of Mexico contained several large paleo-lakes (known collectively asLake Texcoco) surrounded by dense forest. Deer were found in this area, but most fauna were small land animals and fish and other lacustrine animals were found in the lake region.[5] Such conditions encouraged the initial pursuit of a hunter-gatherer existence. Indigenous peoples in western Mexico began to selectively breed maize (Zea mays) plants between 5,000 and 10,000 years ago.[6] The diet of ancient central and southern Mexico was varied, including domesticated corn (ormaize),squashes, beans, tomatoes, peppers, cassavas, pineapples, chocolate, and tobacco.The Three Sisters (corn, squash, and beans) constituted the principal diet.[7]
Shield Jaguar andLady Xoc, Maya, lintel 24 of temple 23, Yaxchilan, Mexico, ca. 725 ce.
Mesoamericans had belief systems where every element of the cosmos and everything that forms part of nature represented a supernatural manifestation. The spiritual pantheon was vast and extremely complex. They frequently took on different characteristics and even names in other areas, but in effect, they transcended cultures and time. Great masks with gaping jaws and monstrous features in stone or stucco were often located at the entrance to temples, symbolizing a cavern or cave on the flanks of the mountains that allowed access to the depths of Mother Earth and the shadowy roads that lead to the underworld.[8] Cults connected with the jaguar and jade especially permeated religion throughout Mesoamerica.Jade, with its translucent green color, was revered along with water as a symbol of life and fertility. The jaguar, agile, powerful, and fast, was especially connected with warriors and as spirit guides of shamans. Despite differences in chronology or geography, the crucial aspects of this religious pantheon were shared amongst the people of ancient Mesoamerica.[8] Thus, this quality of acceptance of new gods to the collection of existing gods may have been one of the shaping characteristics for success during the Christianization of Mesoamerica. New gods did not at once replace the old; they initially joined the ever-growing family of deities or were merged with existing ones that seemed to share similar characteristics or responsibilities.[8]
Mesoamerica is the only place in the Americas where Indigenous writing systems were invented and used before European colonization. While the types of writing systems in Mesoamerica range from minimalist "picture-writing" to complexlogophonetic systems capable of recording speech and literature, they all share some core features that make them visually and functionally distinct from other writing systems of the world.[9] Although many indigenous manuscripts have been lost or destroyed, texts known asAztec codices,Mayan codices, andMixtec codices still survive and are of intense interest to scholars.
During the pre-Columbian period, many city-states, kingdoms, and empires competed with one another for power and prestige. Ancient Mexico can be said to have produced five major civilizations: the Olmec, Maya, Teotihuacan, Toltec, and Aztec. Unlike other indigenous Mexican societies, these civilizations (except the politically fragmented Maya) extended their political and cultural reach across Mexico and beyond.
They consolidated power and exercised influence in trade, art, politics, technology, and religion. Over 3,000 years, other regional powers made economic and political alliances with them; many made war on them. But almost all found themselves within their spheres of influence.
The Olmec first appeared along the Atlantic coast (in what is now the state ofTabasco) in the period 1500–900 BCE. The Olmecs were the first Mesoamerican culture to produce an identifiable artistic and cultural style and may also have been the society that invented writing in Mesoamerica. By the Middle Preclassic Period (900–300 BCE), Olmec artistic styles had been adopted as far away as the Valley of Mexico and Costa Rica.
Chacmool, Maya, from the Platform of the Eagles, Chichen Itza, Mexico, ca. 800–90 CE
Maya cultural characteristics, such as the rise of theahau, or king, can be traced from 300 BCE onward. During the centuries preceding the classical period, Maya kingdoms stretched from the Pacific coasts of southern Mexico and Guatemala to the northernYucatán Peninsula. The egalitarian Maya society of pre-royal centuries gradually led to a society controlled by a wealthy elite that began building large ceremonial temples and complexes. The earliest known long-count date, 199 AD, heralds the classic period, during which the Maya kingdoms supported a population numbering in the millions.Tikal, the largest of the kingdoms, alone had 500,000 inhabitants, though the average population of a kingdom was much smaller—somewhere under 50,000 people.
Goddess, mural painting from the Tetitla apartment complex at Teotihuacan, Mexico, 650–750 CE
Teotihuacan is an enormousarchaeological site in theBasin of Mexico, containing some of the largestpyramidal structures built in thepre-ColumbianAmericas. Apart from the pyramidal structures, Teotihuacan is also known for its large residential complexes, the Avenue of the Dead, and numerous colorful, well-preservedmurals. Additionally, Teotihuacan produced a thin orange pottery style that spread through Mesoamerica.[10]
The city is thought to have been established around 100 BCE and continued to be built until about 250 CE.[11] The city may have lasted until sometime between the 7th and 8th centuries CE. At its zenith, perhaps in the first half of the1st millennium CE, Teotihuacan was the largest city in the pre-Columbian Americas. At this time, it may have had more than 200,000 inhabitants, placing it among the world's largest cities in this period. Teotihuacan was even home to multi-floor apartment compounds built to accommodate this large population.[11]
The civilization and cultural complex associated with the site is also referred to as Teotihuacan or Teotihuacano. Although it is a subject of debate whether Teotihuacan was the center of a state empire, its influence throughoutMesoamerica is well documented. The ethnicity of the inhabitants of Teotihuacan is also a subject of debate. Possible candidates are theNahua,Otomi orTotonac ethnic groups. Scholars have also suggested that Teotihuacan was a multiethnic state.
Colossal atlantids, pyramid B, Toltec, Tula, Mexico, ca. 900–1180 AD
The Toltec culture is an archaeologicalMesoamerican culture that dominated a state centered inTula, Hidalgo, in the early post-classic period ofMesoamerican chronology (ca 800–1000 AD). The laterAztec culture saw the Toltecs as their intellectual and cultural predecessors and described Toltec culture emanating from Tollan (Nahuatl for Tula) as the epitome of civilization; indeed, in the Nahuatl language, the word "Toltec" came to take on the meaning "artisan."
The Aztec oral and pictographic tradition also described the history of the Toltec empire, giving lists of rulers and their exploits. Among modern scholars, it is a matter of debate whether the Aztec narratives of Toltec history should be given credence as descriptions of actual historical events. Other controversies relating to the Toltecs include how best to understand the reasons behind the perceived similarities in architecture and iconography between the archaeological site of Tula and the Maya site ofChichén Itzá – no consensus has emerged yet about the degree or direction of influence between the two sites.
The Nahua people began to enter central Mexico in the 6th century CE. By the 12th century, they had established their center atAzcapotzalco, the city of the Tepanecs.
The Mexica people arrived in the Valley of Mexico in 1248 CE. They had migrated from the deserts north of the Rio Grande[citation needed] over a period traditionally said to have been 100 years. They may have thought of themselves as the heirs to the prestigious civilizations that had preceded them.[citation needed] What the Aztecs initially lacked in political power, they made up for with ambition and military skill. In 1325, they established the biggest city in the world,Tenochtitlan.
Aztec religion was based on the belief in the continual need for regular offerings of human blood to keep their deities beneficent; to meet this need, the Aztecs sacrificed thousands of people. This belief is thought to have been common throughout the Nahuatl people. To acquire captives in times of peace, the Aztecs resorted to ritual warfare calledflower war. The Tlaxcalteca, among other Nahuatl nations, were forced into such wars. Though human sacrifice was common in Mesoamerica, the scale ofhuman sacrifice under the Aztecs was likely unprecedented in the region.[13]
In 1428, the Aztecs led a war against their rulers from the city of Azcapotzalco, which had subjugated most of the Valley of Mexico's peoples. The revolt was successful, and the Aztecs became central Mexico's rulers as theTriple Alliance leaders. The alliance was composed of the city-states ofTenochtitlan,Texcoco, andTlacopan.
At their peak, 350,000 Aztecs presided over a wealthy tribute empire comprising 10 million people, almost half of Mexico's estimated population of 24 million. Their empire stretched from ocean to ocean and extended into Central America. The westward expansion of the empire was halted by a devastating military defeat at the hands of thePurepecha (who possessed weapons made of copper). The empire relied upon a system oftaxation (of goods and services), which was collected through an elaboratebureaucracy of tax collectors, courts, civil servants, and local officials who were installed as loyalists to the Triple Alliance.
By 1519, the Aztec capital,Tenochtitlan, the site of modern-dayMexico City, was one of the largest cities in the world, with an estimated population between 200,000 and 300,000.[14]
Battle of Centla, the first time a horse was used in battle in a war in the Americas. Mural in the Palacio Municipal of Paraíso,Tabasco
A phase of inland expeditions and conquest followed the first mainland explorations. TheSpanish crown extended theReconquista effort, completed in Spain in 1492, to non-Catholic people in new territories. The first Europeans to arrive in modern-day Mexico were the survivors of a Spanish shipwreck in 1511. Only two survived,Gerónimo de Aguilar andGonzalo Guerrero, until further contact was made with Spanish explorers years later. On 8 February 1517, an expedition led byFrancisco Hernández de Córdoba left the harbor ofSantiago de Cuba to explore the shores of southern Mexico. During this expedition, many of Hernández's men were killed, most during a battle near the town ofChampotón against aMaya army. Hernández himself was injured and died a few days shortly after his return to Cuba. This was the Europeans' first encounter with a civilization in the Americas with buildings and complex social organizations that they recognized as comparable to theOld World.Hernán Cortés led a new expedition to Mexico, landing ashore at present-dayVeracruz on 22 April 1519.
The Spanish conquest of Mexico denotes the conquest of the central region of Mesoamerica, where the Aztec Empire was based. The fall of the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan in 1521 was a decisive event, but the conquest of other regions of Mexico, such as Yucatán, extended long after the Spaniards consolidated control of central Mexico. TheSpanish conquest of Yucatán was a much longer campaign, from 1551 to 1697, against theMaya peoples of theMaya civilization in theYucatán Peninsula of present-day Mexico and northernCentral America.
Smallpox (Variola major andVariola minor) began to spread in Mesoamerica immediately after the arrival of Europeans. The indigenous peoples, who had noimmunity to it, eventuallydied in the millions.[15] A third of all the natives of the Valley of Mexico succumbed to it within six months of the Spaniards' arrival.
Tenochtitlan was almost destroyed by fire and cannon fire. Cortés imprisoned the royal families of the valley. To prevent another revolt, he tortured and killedCuauhtémoc, the last Aztec Emperor; Coanacoch, the King of Texcoco, andTetlepanquetzal, King ofTlacopan.
The small contingent of Spaniards controlled central Mexico through existing indigenous rulers of individual political states (altepetl), who maintained their status as nobles in the post-conquest era if they cooperated with Spanish rule. Cortés immediately bannedhuman sacrifice throughout the conquered empire. In 1524, he requested the Spanish king to send friars from the mendicant orders, particularly theFranciscan,Dominican, and Augustinian, to convert the indigenous to Christianity. This has often been called the "spiritual conquest of Mexico."[16] Christian evangelization began in the early 1520s and continued into the 1560s. Many of the mendicant friars, especially the Franciscans and Dominicans, learned the native languages and recorded aspects of native culture.[17] The Spanish colonizers introduced theencomienda system of forced labor. Indigenous communities were pressed for labor and tribute but were not enslaved. Their rulers remained Indigenous elites who retained their status under colonial rule and were useful intermediaries.[18] The Spanish also used forced labor, often outright slavery, in mining.[19]
The capture of Tenochtitlan marked the beginning of a 300-year colonial period, during which Mexico was known as "New Spain" and ruled by aviceroy in the name of the Spanish monarch. Colonial Mexico had key elements to attract Spanish immigrants: dense and politically complex indigenous populations that could be compelled to work and vast mineral wealth, especially major silver deposits. This wealth made Spain a dominant power in Europe. Spain's silver mining and crown mints created high-quality coins, thecurrency of Spanish America, the silverpeso orSpanish dollar that became a global currency.
Spain did not bring all areas of the Aztec Empire under its control. After the fall of Tenochtitlan in 1521, it took decades of warfare to subdue the rest ofMesoamerica, particularly the Mayan regions of southern New Spain, and into what is nowCentral America. Spanish conquests of south Mesoamerica's Zapotec and Mixtec regions were relatively rapid.
Outside the zone of settled Mesoamerican civilizations were semi-nomadic northern peoples who fought fiercely against the Spaniards and their indigenous allies, such as theTlaxcalans, in theChichimeca War (1550–1590). The northern indigenous populations had gained mobility via the horses that Spaniards had imported to the New World. The region was important to the Spanish because of its rich silver deposits. The Spanish mining settlements and trunk lines to Mexico City needed to be made safe for supplies to move north and silver to move south to central Mexico.
The most important source of wealth was indigenous tribute and compelled labor, mobilized in the first years after the conquest of central Mexico through theencomienda. The encomienda was a grant of the labor of a particular indigenous settlement to an individual Spanish and his heirs. Spaniards were the recipients of traditional indigenous products that had been rendered in tribute to their local lords and the Aztec Empire. The earliest holders of encomiendas, the encomenderos, were the conquerors involved in the campaign leading to the fall of Tenochtitlan and later their heirs and people with influence but not conquerors. Forced labor could be directed toward developing land and industry. Land was a secondary source of wealth during this immediate conquest period. Where indigenous labor was absent or needed supplementing, the Spanish brought enslaved people, often as skilled laborers or artisans.[citation needed]
Europeans, Africans, and indigenous intermixed, creating a mixed-racecasta population in a process known asmestizaje.Mestizos, people of mixed European-indigenous ancestry, constitute most of Mexico's population.[20]
Colonial Mexico was part of theSpanish Empire and was administered by theViceroyalty of New Spain. New Spain became the largest and most important Spanish colony. During the 16th century,Spain focused on conquering areas with dense populations that had produced pre-Columbian civilizations. These populations were a labor force with a history of tribute and a population to convert to Christianity. Territories populated by nomadic peoples were harder to conquer. Although the Spanish explored much ofNorth America, seeking the fabled "El Dorado," they made no concerted effort to settle the northern desert regions in what is now theUnited States until the end of the 16th century (Santa Fe, 1598).
Spanish and Portuguese empires in 1790
Colonial law with native origins but with Spanish historical precedents was introduced, creating a balance between local jurisdiction (theCabildos) and theCrown. The administration was based on aracial separation of the population among the Republics of Spaniards, Natives, and Mestizos,autonomous and directly dependent on theking.
The population of New Spain was divided into four main groups or classes. The group a person belonged to was determined by racial background and birthplace. The most powerful group was the Spaniards, people born in Spain and sent across the Atlantic to rule the colony. Only Spaniards could hold high-level jobs in the colonial government. The second group, calledcriollos, were people of Spanish background but born in Mexico. Many criollos were prosperous landowners and merchants. The third group, themestizos ("mixed"), were people who had some Spanish ancestors and some Native ancestors. Mestizos had a lower position and were looked down upon by the Spaniards and the Creoles. The poorest, most marginalized group in New Spain was the Natives, descendants of pre-Columbian peoples. They had less power and endured harsher conditions than other groups. Natives were forced to work as laborers on the ranches and farms (calledhaciendas) of the Spaniards and Creoles. In addition to the four main groups, some Africans were in colonial Mexico. These Africans wereimported as enslaved people and shared the low status of the Natives. They made up about 4% to 5% of the population, and their mixed-race descendants, calledmulattoes, eventually grew to represent about 9%.From an economic point of view,New Spain was administered principally for the benefit of theEmpire and its military and defensive efforts. Mexico provided more than half of theEmpire's taxes and supported the administration of allNorth andCentral America. Competition with the metropolis was discouraged; for example, cultivation ofgrapes andolives, introduced by Cortés himself, was banned out of fear that these crops would compete with Spain's.[21]
To protect the country from the attacks by English, French, and Dutchpirates, as well as the Crown's revenue, only two ports were open to foreign trade—Veracruz on the Atlantic, connecting throughHavana atCuba to Spain;[22][23] andAcapulco, connecting throughManila at thePhilippines, on the Pacific, to Asia.[24][25]
Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz
The Crown encouraged education: Mexico boasts the first primary school (Texcoco, 1523), the first university, theUniversity of Mexico (1551), and the first printing press (1524) of theAmericas. Indigenous languages were studied mainly by religious orders during the first centuries and became official languages in the so-called Republic of Natives, only to be outlawed and ignored after independence.
Criollos, mixed-race castas, and Natives often disagreed, but all resented the small minority of Iberian-born Spaniards monopolizing political power. By the early 1800s, many American-born Spaniards believed that Mexico should become independent of Spain, following the example of the United States. The man who touched off the revolt against Spain was theCatholic priestMiguel Hidalgo y Costilla. He is remembered today as theFather of the Nation.[26]
This period was marked by unanticipated events that upended the three hundred years of Spanish colonial rule. The colony went from rule by the legitimate Spanish monarch and his appointed viceroy to an illegitimate monarch and viceroy put in place by a coup. Later, Mexico would see the return of the Spanish monarchy and a later stalemate with insurgent guerrilla forces.
Events in Spain during thePeninsular War and theTrienio Liberal upended the situation in New Spain. After Spanish military officers overthrew the absolutist monarchFerdinand VII and returned to the liberalSpanish Constitution of 1812, conservatives in New Spain who had staunchly defended the Spanish monarchy changed course and pursued independence. Royalist army officerAgustín de Iturbide became an advocate of independence and persuaded insurgent leaderVicente Guerrero to join in a coalition, forming theArmy of the Three Guarantees. Within six months of that joint venture, royal rule in New Spain collapsed, and independence was achieved.
The constitutional monarchy envisioned with a European royal on the throne did not pass; Creole military officer Iturbide became Emperor Agustín I. His increasingly autocratic rule dismayed many, and a coup overthrew him in 1823. Mexico became afederated republic and promulgated aconstitution in 1824. While GeneralGuadalupe Victoria became the first president, serving his entire term, the presidential transition became less of an electoral event and more of one by force of arms. Insurgent general and prominent Liberal politician Vicente Guerrero was briefly president in 1829, then deposed and judicially murdered by his Conservative opponents.
Mexico experienced political instability and violence in the first years after independence, with more to come until the late nineteenth century. The presidency changed hands 75 times in the next half-century.[27] The new republic's situation did not promote economic growth or development, with the silver mines damaged, trade disrupted, and lingering violence.[28][29] Although British merchants established a network of merchant houses in the major cities the situation was bleak. "Trade was stagnant. Imports did not pay, contraband drove prices down, private and public debts went unpaid, merchants suffered all manner of injustices and operated at the mercy of weak and corruptible governments."[30]
Inspired by the American and French Revolutions, Mexican insurgents saw an opportunity for independence in 1808 when Napoleon invaded Spain, and the Spanish kingCharles IV was forced to surrender. Napoleon placed his brotherJoseph Bonaparte on the Spanish throne. In New Spain, viceroyJosé de Iturrigaray proposed to provisionally form an autonomous government, with the support of American-born Spaniards on thecity council of Mexico City. Peninsular-born Spaniards in the colony saw this as undermining their power, andGabriel J. de Yermo led a coup against the viceroy, arresting him in September 1808. Spanish conspirators named Spanish military officerPedro de Garibay viceroy. His tenure was brief, from September 1808 until July 1809, when he was replaced byFrancisco Javier de Lizana y Beaumont, whose tenure was also short until the arrival of viceroyFrancisco Javier Venegas from Spain. Two days after he entered Mexico City on 14 September 1810, FatherMiguel Hidalgo called to arms in the village of Hidalgo. France and the Spanish king invaded Spain, was deposed, andJoseph Bonaparte imposed. New Spain's viceroyJosé de Iturrigaray, sympathetic to Creoles, sought to create a legitimate government but was overthrown by powerful Peninsular Spaniards; hard-line Spaniards clamped down on any notion of Mexican autonomy. Creoles who had hoped that there was a path to Mexican autonomy, perhaps within the Spanish Empire, now saw that their only path was independence through rebellion.
In northern Mexico, FatherMiguel Hidalgo, creole militia officerIgnacio Allende, andJuan Aldama met to plot rebellion. When the plot was discovered in September 1810, Hidalgo called his parishioners to arms in the village of Dolores, touching off a massive rebellion in the region of the Bajío. This event of 16 September 1810 is now called the "Cry of Dolores," and is now celebrated as Independence Day. Shouting, "Independence and death to the Spaniards!" Some 80,000 poorly organized and armed villagers formed a force that initially rampaged unstopped inBajío. The viceroy was slow to respond, but once the royal army engaged the untrained, poorly armed and led mass, they routed the insurgents in theBattle of Calderón Bridge. Hidalgo was captured, defrocked as a priest, and executed.[31]
Another priest,José María Morelos, took over and was more successful in his quest forrepublicanism and independence. Spain's monarchy was restored in 1814 afterNapoleon's defeat, and it fought back and executed Morelos in 1815. The scattered insurgents formed guerrilla bands. In 1820, the Spanish royal army brigadierAgustín de Iturbide changed sides and proposed independence, issuing thePlan of Iguala. Iturbide persuaded insurgent leaderVicente Guerrero to join this new push for independence. GeneralIsidoro Montes de Oca, with few and poorly armed insurgents, inflicted a real defeat on the royalist Gabriel from Armijo, and they also got enough equipment to arm 1,800 rebels properly. He stood out for his courage in theSiege of Acapulco in 1813, under the orders of General José María Morelos y Pavón.[32] Isidoro inflicted defeat on the royalist army from Spain. Impressed, Itubide joined forces with Guerrero and demanded independence, a constitutional monarchy in Mexico, the continued religious monopoly for the Catholic Church, and equality for Spaniards and those born in Mexico. Royalists who now followed Iturbide's change of sides and insurgents formed theArmy of the Three Guarantees. Within six months, the new army controlled all but the ports of Veracruz and Acapulco. On September 27, 1821, Iturbide and the last viceroy,Juan O'Donojú, signed theTreaty of Córdoba whereby Spain granted the demands. O'Donojú had been operating under instructions issued months before the latest events. Spain refused to recognize Mexico's independence formally, and the situation became even more complicated by O'Donojú's death in October 1821.[33]
Agustín de Iturbide the firstEmperor of Mexico in 1822 after leading the Mexican War of Independence against Spain, but his reign was short-lived, lasting only until 1823 when he abdicated, and Mexico transitioned to a republic.
When Mexico achieved its independence, the southern portion of New Spain became independent as well, as a result of the Treaty of Córdoba, so Central America, present-dayCosta Rica,El Salvador,Guatemala,Honduras,Nicaragua, and part ofChiapas wereincorporated into the Mexican Empire. Although Mexico now had its own government, there was no revolutionary social or economic change. The formal, legalracial distinctions were abolished, but power remained in the hands of white elites. The power vacuum left by the viceroyalty was filled by the military and the Catholic Church. Both the army and the church lost personnel while establishing the new regime. An index of the fall in the economy was the decrease in revenues to the church via the tithe, a tax on agricultural output. Mining, especially, was hard hit. It had been the motor of the colonial economy, but there was considerable fighting during the war of independence in Zacatecas and Guanajuato, the two most important silver mining sites.[34] Despite Viceroy O'Donojú's signing the Treaty of Córdoba giving Mexico independence, the Spanish government did not recognize it as legitimate and claimed sovereignty over Mexico.
With Spain's rejection of the treaty and no European royal taking up the offer of being Mexico's monarch, many Creoles decided that having a Mexican as its monarch was acceptable. A local army garrison proclaimed Iturbide emperor. Since the church refused to crown him, the president of the constituent Congress did so on 21 July 1822. His long-term rule was doomed. He did not have the respect of the Mexican nobility. Republicans sought that form of government rather than a monarchy. The emperor set up all the trappings of a monarchy with a court. Iturbide became increasingly dictatorial and shut down Congress. Worried that a young colonel,Antonio López de Santa Anna, would raise a rebellion, the emperor relieved him of his command. Rather than obeying the order, Santa Anna proclaimed a republic and hastily called for the reconvening of Congress. Four days later, he walked back to his republicanism and called for the removal of the emperor in thePlan of Casa Mata. Santa Anna secured the support of insurgent generalGuadalupe Victoria. The army signed on to the plan, and the emperor surrendered on March 19, 1823.[35]
Battle of Tampico (1829) a conflict between Mexican forces led by General Antonio López de Santa Anna and Spanish loyalists attempting to reconquer Mexico, resulting in a decisive Mexican victory that further solidified Mexico's independence from Spain.
Those who overthrew the emperor then nullified thePlan of Iguala, which had called for a constitutional monarchy and the Treaty of Córdoba, freeing them to choose a new government. It was to be a federal republic, and on 4 October 1824, the United Mexican States (Estados Unidos Mexicanos) was established. The new constitution was partly modeled on theconstitution of the United States. It guaranteed basic human rights and defined Mexico as a representative federal republic in which the responsibilities of government were divided between a central government and several smaller units called states. It also defined Catholicism as the official and only religion of the republic. Central America did not join the federated republic and took a separate political path from 1 July 1823.
Mexico's establishment of a new form of government did not bring stability. The civilian government contested political power from the army and the Catholic Church. The military and the church retained legal privileges calledfueros. GeneralGuadalupe Victoria was followed in office by GeneralVicente Guerrero, gaining the position through a coup after losing the1828 elections. TheConservative Party saw an opportunity to seize control and led a counter-coup under GeneralAnastasio Bustamante, who served as president from 1830 to 1832, and again from 1837 to 1841.
GeneralSanta Anna known for his leadership during the Texas Revolution, Mexican-American War, and turbulent periods of Mexican history marked by political instability and territorial losses.
In much of Spanish America, soon after its independence, military strongmen orcaudillos dominated politics, and this period is often called "The Age of Caudillismo." In Mexico, from the late 1820s to the mid-1850s, the period is often called the "Age of Santa Anna," named for the general and politicianAntonio López de Santa Anna. Liberals (federalists) asked Santa Anna to overthrow the conservative PresidentAnastasio Bustamante. After he did, he declared GeneralManuel Gómez Pedraza (who won the election of 1828) president. Elections were held after that, and Santa Anna took office in 1832. He served as president for 11 non-consecutive terms.[36] Constantly changing his political beliefs, in 1834 Santa Anna abolished thefederal constitution, causing insurgencies in the southeastern state ofYucatán and the northernmost portion of the northern state ofCoahuila y Tejas. Both areas sought independence from the central government. Negotiations and the presence of Santa Anna's army caused Yucatán to recognize Mexicansovereignty. Then, Santa Anna's army turned to the northern rebellion.
The inhabitants of Tejas declared theRepublic of Texas independent from Mexico on 2 March 1836 atWashington-on-the-Brazos. They called themselves Texans and were led mainly by recentAnglo-American settlers. At theBattle of San Jacinto on April 21, 1836,Texan militiamen defeated the Mexican army and captured General Santa Anna. The Mexican government refused to recognize Texas' independence.
Comanchería, territory controlled by the Comanches, prior to 1850
The northern states grew increasingly isolated, economically and politically, due to prolongedComanche raids and attacks. The local peoples had not recognized the Spanish Empire's claims to the region, nor did they when Mexico became an independent nation. Mexico attempted to convince its citizens to settle in the region but with few takers. Mexico negotiated a contract with Anglo-Americans to settle in the area, hoping and expecting that they would do so in Comanche territory, theComancheria. In the 1820s, when the United States began to influence the region, New Mexico had already questioned its loyalty to Mexico. By the time of the Mexican–American War, the Comanches had raided and pillaged large portions of northern Mexico, resulting in sustained impoverishment, political fragmentation, and general frustration at the inability—or unwillingness—of the Mexican government to discipline the Comanches.[37]
In addition to Comanche raids, the First Republic's northern border was plagued with attacks on its northern border from the Apache people, who were supplied with guns by American merchants.[38] Goods including guns and shoes were sold to the Apache, the latter being discovered by Mexican forces when they found traditional Apache trails with American shoe prints instead of moccasin prints.[38]
After the Mexican War of Independence, the Mexican government, to populate its northern territories, awarded extensive land grants inCoahuila y Tejas to thousands of families from the United States so that the settlers convert to Catholicism and become Mexican citizens. The Mexican government also forbade the importation of enslaved people. These conditions were largely ignored.[39]
A key factor in the government's decision to allow those settlers was the belief that they would (a) protect northern Mexico from Comanche attacks and (b) buffer the northern states against US westward expansion. The policy failed on both counts: the Americans tended to settle far from the Comanche raiding zones and used the Mexican government's failure to suppress the raids as a pretext for declaring independence.[37]
TheTexas Revolution or Texas War of Independence was a military conflict between Mexico and settlers in theTexas portion of the Mexican stateCoahuila y Tejas. The war lasted from October 2, 1835, to April 21, 1836. However, war at sea between Mexico and Texas continued into the 1840s. The animosity between the Mexican government and the American settlers in Texas, as well as many Texas residents of Mexican ancestry, intensified with theSiete Leyes of 1835 when Mexican President and GeneralAntonio López de Santa Anna abolished the federalConstitution of 1824 and proclaimed the more centralizing1835 constitution in its place.
War began in Texas on October 2, 1835, with theBattle of Gonzales. Early Texian Army successes atLa Bahia andSan Antonio were soon met with crushing defeat at the same locations a few months later. The war ended at theBattle of San Jacinto, where GeneralSam Houston led theTexian Army to victory over a portion of theMexican Army underSanta Anna, who was captured soon after the battle. The war's end resulted in the creation of theRepublic of Texas in 1836. In 1845, the U.S. Congress ratified Texas's petition for statehood.
In response to a Mexican attack on a U.S. army detachment in disputed territory, the U.S. Congress declared war on May 13, 1846; Mexico followed suit on May 23. TheMexican–American War took place in two theaters: the Western (aimed atCalifornia) and Central Mexico (aimed at capturing Mexico City) campaigns.
A map of Mexico 1845 after Texas annexation by the U.S.
In March 1847, U.S. PresidentJames K. Polk sent an army of 12,000 soldiers under GeneralWinfield Scott to Veracruz. The 70 ships of the invading forces arrived at the city on 7 March and began a naval bombardment. After landing, Scott started theSiege of Veracruz.[40] The city, at that time still walled, was bombarded from land and sea. After 12 days, the Mexicans surrendered. Scott marched west with 8,500 men, while Santa Anna was entrenched with artillery and 12,000 troops on the main road halfway to Mexico City. Santa Anna was outflanked and routed at theBattle of Cerro Gordo.
Scott pushed on toPuebla, then Mexico's second-largest city, which capitulated without resistance on 1 May—the citizens were hostile to Santa Anna. After theBattle of Chapultepec (13 September 1847), Mexico City was occupied; Scott became its military governor. Many other parts of Mexico were also occupied. Some Mexican units fought with distinction: a group of sixMilitary College cadets (now considered Mexican national heroes) who fought to the death defending their college during theBattle of Chapultepec.
The war ended with theTreaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which stipulated that (1) Mexico must sell its northern territories to the US for US$15 million; (2) the US would give full citizenship and voting rights and protect the property rights of Mexicans living in the ceded territories; and (3) the US would assume $3.25 million in debt owed by Mexico to Americans.[41] Mexico's defeat has been attributed to its problematic internal situation, one of disunity and disorganization.
Despite Santa Anna's role in the Mexican–American War catastrophe, he returned to power again. When the U.S. ambitioned an easier railroad route to California south of theGila River, Santa Anna sold the Gadsden Strip to the US for $10 million in theGadsden Purchase in 1853. This loss of more territory provoked outrage among Mexicans, but Santa Anna claimed that he needed money to rebuild the army from the war. In the end, he kept or squandered most of it.[42] Liberals finally coalesced and successfully rebelled against his regime, promulgating thePlan of Ayutla in 1854 and forcing Santa Anna into exile.[43][44] Liberals came to power and began enacting reforms they had long envisioned.
Struggle between liberals and conservatives, 1855–1876
Ignacio Comonfort significant role during the tumultuous period of the mid-19th century, including the Reform War and early stages of the Mexican Republic's transition.
La Reforma began with the final overthrow of Santa Anna in thePlan of Ayutla in 1855. Moderate LiberalIgnacio Comonfort became President. TheModerados tried to find a middle ground between the nation's liberals and conservatives. There is less consensus about the ending point of the Reforma.[46] Common dates are 1861, after the liberal victory in theReform War; 1867, after the republican victory over theFrench intervention in Mexico; and 1876 whenPorfirio Díaz overthrew PresidentSebastián Lerdo de Tejada. Liberalism dominated Mexico as an intellectual force into the 20th century. Liberals championed reform and supportedrepublicanism, capitalism, and individualism; they fought to reduce the Church's roles in education, land ownership, and politics.[46] Also importantly, liberals sought to end the special status of indigenous communities by ending their corporate ownership of land.
Battle of Miahuatlán took place on 3 October 1866. The liberal victory atMiahuatlán was significant because it allowed them to consolidate their control over southern Mexico.
Comonfort was a moderate who tried and failed to maintain an uncertain coalition of liberals and moderates. Liberals drafted theConstitution of 1857, which decreased the executive's power, incorporated the Reform laws, curtailed the Catholic Church's traditional powers, and granted religious freedom.[47] The anti-clerical liberals scored a major victory with the constitution's ratification because it weakened the Church and enfranchised non-property-owning men. The constitution was opposed by the army, the clergy, the other conservatives, and some moderates. With thePlan of Tacubaya in December 1857, conservative GeneralFélix Zuloaga led a coup in the capital in January 1858, creating a parallel government in Mexico City. Comonfort resigned from the presidency and was succeeded by the President of the Supreme Court,Benito Juárez, who became President of the Republic, leading Mexican liberals.[47]
The revolt led to theWar of Reform (1857–1861), which grew increasingly bloody as it progressed and polarized the nation's politics. Many Moderates, convinced that the Church's political power had to be curbed, came over to the side of the Liberals. For some time, the Liberals and Conservatives simultaneously administered separate governments, the Conservatives from Mexico City and the Liberals from Veracruz. The war ended with a Liberal victory, and liberal President Benito Juárez moved his administration to Mexico City.
In 1862, the countrywas invaded by France sought to collect debts that the Juárez government had defaulted on. Still, the larger purpose was to install a ruler under French control. Archduke Ferdinand Maximilian of Austria was installed asEmperor Maximilian I of Mexico, with support from the Catholic Church, conservative elements of the upper class, and some indigenous communities.
The French faced an initial setback at theBattle of Puebla on May 5, 1862 (commemorated today asCinco de Mayo). However, they later overcame the Mexican army and established Maximilian of Habsburg as Emperor of Mexico. The Mexican-French monarchy set up administration in Mexico City, governing from the National Palace.[48] Maximilian has been noted by some historians for implementing liberal reforms and expressing a genuine desire to improve the welfare of the Mexican population. However, others have criticized his administration, alleging it exploited Mexico's resources to benefit French interests and allies, including favoring the plans ofNapoleon III to exploit the mines in the northwest of the country and to grow cotton.[48]
Maximilian favored establishing a limited monarchy to share power with a democratically elected congress. This was too liberal for conservatives, while liberals refused to accept any monarch, considering the republican government of Benito Juárez as legitimate. Meanwhile, Juárez continued to be recognized by the United States, which was engaged in itsCivil War (1861–65) and at that juncture was in no position to aid Juárez directly against the French intervention until 1865. France never made a profit in Mexico, and its Mexican expedition grew increasingly unpopular. After the US Civil War, the US demanded the withdrawal of French troops from Mexico. At the end of the American Civil War, Secretary of StateWilliam Seward was instrumental in negotiations with France, and worked with Napoleon III to withdraw French troops from Mexico. Seward's diplomacy helped prevent the French from allying with the Confederacy. Napoleon III quietly complied. In mid-1867, despite repeated Imperial losses in battle to the Republican Army and ever-decreasing support from Napoleon III, Maximilian chose to remain in Mexico rather than return to Europe. He was captured and executed along with two Mexican supporters. Juárez remained in office until he died in 1872.
In 1867, with the overthrow of the monarchy, the Republic was restored, and Juárez was reelected. He continued to implement his reforms. In 1871, he was elected a second time, much to the dismay of his opponents within the Liberal party, who considered reelection somewhat undemocratic. Juárez died the following year and was succeeded bySebastián Lerdo de Tejada. Part of Juárez's reforms included fully secularizing the country. The Catholic Church was barred from owning property aside from houses of worship and monasteries, and education and marriage were put in the hands of the state.
Porfirio Díaz dominant Mexican political and military figure who served as President for much of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, characterized by his long rule and the modernization efforts known as the Porfiriato.
The rule ofPorfirio Díaz (1876–1911) was dedicated to the rule by law, suppression of violence and modernization of the country. Diaz was a military commander on the liberal side in the 1860s who seized power ina coup in 1876, established a dictatorship, and ruled in collaboration with the landed oligarchy. He maintained good relations with the United States and Great Britain, which led to a sharp rise in foreign direct investment, especially in mining. The general standard of living rose steadily. He adhered to a laissez-faire doctrine that primarily benefited the already privileged social classes. Diaz was overthrown by the Mexican Revolution of 1911 and died in exile.[49]
This period of relative prosperity is known as thePorfiriato. As traditional ways were challenged, urban Mexicans debated national identity, the rejection of indigenous cultures, the new passion for French culture once the French were ousted from Mexico, and the challenge of creating a modern nation-state through industrialization and scientific development.[50] Cities were rebuilt with modernizing architects favoring the latest Western European styles, especially theBeaux-Arts style, to symbolize the break with the past. A highly visible exemplar was theFederal Legislative Palace, built 1897–1910.[51]
Díaz remained in power by rigging elections and censoring the press. Rivals were destroyed, and popular generals were moved to new areas so they could not build a permanent support base. Banditry on roads leading to major cities was largely suppressed by the "Rurales," a police force controlled by Díaz, created during a process of military modernization.[52] Díaz was an astute military leader and liberal politician who built a national base of supporters. He maintained a stable relationship with the Catholic Church by avoiding enforcing constitutional anticlerical laws. The country's infrastructure was significantly improved through increased foreign investment from Britain and the US and a strong, participatory central government.[53] Increased tax revenue and better administration improved public safety, public health, railways, mining, industry, foreign trade, and national finances. After a half-century of stagnation, where per capita income was merely a tenth of the developed nations such as Britain and the US, the Mexican economy took off during the Porfiriato, growing at an annual rate of 2.3% (1877 to 1910), which was high by world standards.[53]
Díaz reduced the Army from 30,000 to under 20,000 men, which resulted in a smaller percentage of the national budget being committed to the military. The army was modernized, well-trained, and equipped with the latest technology. The Army was top-heavy with 5,000 officers, many of them elderly but politically well-connected veterans of the wars of the 1860s.[54]
The political skills that Díaz used so effectively before 1900 faded, as he and his closest advisers were less open to negotiations with younger leaders. His announcement in 1908 that he would retire in 1911 unleashed a widespread feeling that Díaz was on the way out and that new coalitions had to be built. He nevertheless ran for reelection and in a show of U.S. support, Díaz andWilliam Taft planned a summit inEl Paso, Texas, andCiudad Juárez, Mexico, for October 16, 1909, a historic first meeting between a Mexican and a U.S. president and also the first time an American president would cross the border into Mexico.[55] The meeting focused attention on the disputedChamizal strip and resulted in assassination threats and other serious security concerns.[55] At the meeting, Díaz toldJohn Hays Hammond, "Since I am responsible for bringing several billion dollars in foreign investments into my country, I think I should continue in my position until a competent successor is found."[56] Díaz was re-elected after a highly controversial election, but he was overthrown in 1911 and forced into exile in France after Army units rebelled.
Fiscal stability was achieved byJosé Yves Limantour, Secretary of Finance of Mexico from 1893 until 1910. He was the leader of the well-educated technocrats known asCientíficos, who were committed to modernity and sound finance. Limantour expanded foreign investment, supported free trade, balanced the budget for the first time, and generated a budget surplus by 1894. However, he could not halt the rising cost of food, which alienated the poor.[57]
The AmericanPanic of 1907 was an economic downturn that caused a sudden drop in demand for Mexican copper, silver, gold, zinc, and other metals. Mexico cut its imports of horses and mules, mining machinery, and railroad supplies. The result was an economic depression in Mexico in 1908–1909 that soured optimism and raised discontent with the Díaz regime.[58] Mexico was vulnerable to external shocks because of its weak banking system.[citation needed]
Mexico had few factories by 1880, but industrialization took hold in the Northeast, especially inMonterrey. Factories produced machinery, textiles, and beer, while smelters processed ores. Convenient rail links with the nearby US gave local entrepreneurs from seven wealthy merchant families a competitive advantage over more distant cities. New federal laws in 1884 and 1887 allowed corporations to be more flexible. By the 1920s, American Smelting and Refining Company (ASARCO), an American firm controlled by the Guggenheim family, had invested over 20 million pesos and employed nearly 2,000 workers smelting copper and making wire to meet the demand for electrical wiring in the US and Mexico.[59]
Making cigarettes in theEl Buen Tono factory, Mexico City
The modernizers insisted that public schools and secular education should replace religious schooling by the Catholic Church.[60] They reformed elementary schools by mandating uniformity, secularization, and rationality. These reforms were consistent with international trends in teaching methods. To break the traditional peasant habits that were seen to hinder industrialization, reforms emphasized children's punctuality, assiduity, and health.[61] In 1910, theNational University was opened.
Historian John Tutino examines the impact of the Porfiriato in the highland basins south of Mexico City. which became the Zapatista heartland during the Revolution. Population growth, railways, and concentration of land in a few families generated a commercial expansion that undercut the traditional powers of the villagers. Young men felt insecure about the patriarchal roles they had expected to fill. Initially, this anxiety manifested as violence within families and communities. But, after the defeat of Díaz in 1910, villagers expressed their rage in revolutionary assaults on local elites who had profited most from the Porfiriato. The young men were radicalized as they fought for their traditional roles regarding land, community, and patriarchy.[62]
TheMexican Revolution is a broad term for political and social changes in the early 20th century. Most scholars consider it to span the years 1910–1920, fromFrancisco I. Madero's call for armed rebellion in thePlan of San Luis Potosí until the election of GeneralÁlvaro Obregón in December 1920. Foreign powers had important economic and strategic interests in the outcome of power struggles in Mexico, withthe United States' participation in the Mexican Revolution playing an especially significant role.[63] The Revolution grew increasingly broad-based, radical, and violent. Revolutionaries sought far-reaching social and economic reforms by strengthening the state and weakening the conservative forces of the Church, rich landowners, and foreign capitalists.
Some scholars consider the promulgation of theMexican Constitution of 1917 as the revolution's endpoint. "Economic and social conditions improved under revolutionary policies, so that the new society took shape within a framework of official revolutionary institutions," with the Constitution providing that framework.[64] Organized labor gained significant power, as seen in Article 123 of the Constitution of 1917.Land reform in Mexico was enabled by Article 27.Economic nationalism was also enabled by Article 27, restricting ownership of enterprises by foreigners. The Constitution restricted theCatholic Church in Mexico; implementing the restrictions in the late 1920s resulted in theCristero War. The Constitution and practice enshrined a ban on the president's re-election. Political succession was achieved in 1929 by creating thePartido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR). This party dominated Mexico's politics for the remainder of the 20th century, now called theInstitutional Revolutionary Party.
One major effect of the revolution was the disappearance of theFederal Army in 1914, defeated by revolutionary forces of the variousfactions in the Mexican Revolution.[65] The Mexican Revolution was based on popular participation. At first, it was based on the peasantry who demanded land, water, and a more representative national government. Wasserman finds that:
Popular participation in the revolution and its aftermath took three forms. First, everyday people, though often in conjunction with elite neighbors, generated local issues such as access to land, taxes, and village autonomy. Second, the popular classes provided soldiers to fight in the revolution. Third, local issues advocated by campesinos and workers framed national discourses on land reform, the role of religion, and many other questions.[66]
Porfirio Díaz announced in an interview with a US journalistJames Creelman that he would not run for president in 1910. This set off a spate of political activity by potential candidates, includingFrancisco I. Madero, a member of one of Mexico's richest families. Madero was part of the Anti-Reelectionist Party, whose main platform was the end of the Díaz regime. But Díaz reversed his decision to retire and ran again. He created the office of vice president, which could have been a mechanism to ease the presidential transition. But Díaz chose a politically unpalatable running mate,Ramón Corral, over a popular military man,Bernardo Reyes, and a popular civilianFrancisco I. Madero. He sent Reyes on a "study mission" to Europe and jailed Madero. Official election results declared that Díaz had won almost unanimously, and Madero received only a few hundred votes. This fraud was too blatant, and riots broke out. Uprisings against Díaz occurred in the fall of 1910, particularly in Mexico's North and the southern state ofMorelos. Helping unite opposition forces was a political plan drafted by Madero, thePlan of San Luis Potosí, in which he called on the Mexican people to take up arms and fight against the Díaz government. The rising was set for November 20, 1910. Madero escaped from prison toSan Antonio, Texas, where he began preparing to overthrow Díaz—an action today considered the start of theMexican Revolution. Díaz tried to use the Army to suppress the revolts, but Revolutionary forces—led by, among others,Emiliano Zapata in the South,Pancho Villa andPascual Orozco in the North, andVenustiano Carranza—defeated theFederal Army.
Díaz resigned in May 1911 for the "sake of the nation's peace." The terms of his resignation were spelled out in theTreaty of Ciudad Juárez, but it also called for an interim presidency and new elections to be held.Francisco León de la Barra served as interim president. The Federal Army, although defeated by the northern revolutionaries, was kept intact.Francisco I. Madero, whose 1910Plan of San Luis Potosí had helped mobilize forces opposed to Díaz, accepted the political settlement. He campaigned in thepresidential elections of October 1911, won decisively, and was inaugurated in November 1911.[67]
Following the resignation of Díaz, Madero was elected president in 1911. The revolutionary leaders had many different objectives; revolutionary figures varied from liberals such as Madero to radicals such asEmiliano Zapata andPancho Villa. Consequently, it proved impossible to agree on how to organize the government that emerged from the triumphant first phase of the revolution. This standoff over political principles quickly led to a struggle for government control, a violent conflict that lasted more than ten years.
Madero was ousted and killed in February 1913 during a coup d'état now known as theTen Tragic Days. GeneralVictoriano Huerta, one of Díaz's former generals and a nephew of Díaz,Félix Díaz, plotted with the US ambassador to Mexico,Henry Lane Wilson, to topple Madero and reassert the policies of Díaz. Within a month of the coup, rebellions started spreading in Mexico, most prominently by the governor of the state of Coahuila,Venustiano Carranza, along with old revolutionaries demobilized by Madero, such asPancho Villa. The northern revolutionaries fought under the name of theConstitutionalist Army, with Carranza as the "First Chief" (primer jefe). In the South,Emiliano Zapata continued his rebellion in Morelos under thePlan of Ayala, calling for the expropriation of land and redistribution to peasants. Huerta offered peace to Zapata, who rejected it.[68]
Huerta convincedPascual Orozco, whom he fought while serving the Madero government, to join Huerta's forces.[69] Supporting the Huerta regime were business interests in Mexico, both foreign and domestic; landed elites; the Catholic Church; and the German and British governments. TheFederal Army became an arm of the Huerta regime, swelling to 200,000 men, many pressed into service and most ill-trained.
The US did not recognize the Huerta government. Still, from February to August 1913, it imposed an arms embargo on exports to Mexico, exempting the Huerta government and favoring the regime against emerging revolutionary forces.[70] However, PresidentWoodrow Wilson sent a special envoy to Mexico to assess the situation, and reports on the many rebellions in Mexico convinced Wilson that Huerta was unable to maintain order. Arms ceased to flow to Huerta's government,[71] which benefited the revolutionary cause.
The US Navy made an incursion on the Gulf Coast, occupyingVeracruz in April 1914. Although Mexico was engaged in a civil war at the time, the US intervention united Mexican forces in their opposition to the US. Foreign powers helped broker US withdrawal in theNiagara Falls peace conference. The US timed its pullout to support the Constitutionalist faction under Carranza.[72]
Initially, the forces in northern Mexico were united under the Constitutionalist banner, with able revolutionary generals serving the civilian First Chief Carranza in thePlan of Guadalupe. Pancho Villa began to split from supporting Carranza as Huerta was on his way out, primarily because Carranza was politically too conservative for Villa. Carranza, a rich hacienda owner whose interests were threatened by Villa's more radical ideas, opposed land reform.[73] Zapata in the South was also hostile to Carranza due to his stance on land reform.
In July 1914, Huerta resigned under pressure and went into exile. His resignation marked the end of an era since theFederal Army, a repeatedly ineffective fighting force against the revolutionaries, ceased to exist.[74]
With the exit of Huerta, the revolutionary factions decided to meet and make "a last-ditch effort to avert more intense warfare than that which unseated Huerta."[75] Called to meet in Mexico City in October 1914, revolutionaries opposed to Carranza's influence successfully moved the venue to Aguascalientes. TheConvention of Aguascalientes did not reconcile the various victoriousfactions in the Mexican Revolution but was a brief pause in revolutionary violence. The break between Carranza and Villa became definitive during the convention. Rather than First Chief Carranza being named president of Mexico, GeneralEulalio Gutiérrez was chosen. Carranza and Obregón left Aguascalientes with far smaller forces than Villa's. The convention declared Carranza in rebellion against it, and civil war resumed, this time between revolutionary armies that had fought for a united cause to oust Huerta.
Villa went into alliance with Zapata to form the Army of the convention. Their forces separately moved on to the capital and captured Mexico City in 1914, which Carranza's forces had abandoned. The famous picture of Villa, sitting in the presidential chair in the National Palace, and Zapata is a classic image of the Revolution. Villa reportedly told Zapata that "the presidential chair is too big for us."[76] The alliance between Villa and Zapata did not function in practice beyond this initial victory against the Constitutionalists. Zapata returned to his southern stronghold in Morelos, where he engaged in guerrilla warfare under the Plan of Ayala.[77]
The two rival armies of Villa and Obregón met on April 6–15, 1915, in theBattle of Celaya. The shrewd, modern military tactics of Obregón met the frontal cavalry charges of Villa's forces. The Constitutionalist victory resulted in Carranza emerging as the political leader of Mexico. Villa retreated north, seemingly into political oblivion. Carranza and the Constitutionalists consolidated their position, with only Zapata opposing them until his assassination in 1919.
Venustiano Carranza promulgated a new constitution on February 5, 1917. TheMexican Constitution of 1917, with significant amendments in the 1990s, still governs Mexico. On 19 January 1917, a secret message (theZimmermann Telegram) was sent from the German foreign minister to Mexico proposing joint military action against the United States if war broke out. The offer included material aid to Mexico to reclaim the territory lost during theMexican–American War. Zimmermann's message was intercepted and published, causing outrage in the US and catalyzingan American declaration of war against Germany in early April. Carranza then formally rejected the offer, and the threat of war with the US eased.[78]
Carranza was assassinated in 1920 during an internal feud among his former supporters over who would replace him as president.
President Obregón. Note that he lost his right arm in theBattle of Celaya (1915), earning him the nickname ofManco de Celaya ("the one-armed man of Celaya").
Three Sonoran generals of the Constitutionalist Army,Álvaro Obregón,Plutarco Elías Calles, andAdolfo de la Huerta dominated Mexican politics in the 1920s. Their life experience in Mexico's northwest, described as a "savage pragmatism"[79] was in a sparsely settled region, conflict with Natives, secular rather than religious culture, and independent, commercially oriented ranchers and farmers. This differed from the subsistence agriculture of the dense population of central Mexico's strongly Catholic indigenous and mestizo peasantry. Obregón was the dominant triumvirate member, the leading general in theConstitutionalist Army, who had defeated Pancho Villa in battle. All three were also skilled politicians and administrators. In Sonora, they "formed their professional army, patronized and allied themselves with labor unions, and expanded the government authority to promote economic development." Once in power, they scaled this up to the national level.[80]
Obregón, Calles, and de la Huerta revolted against Carranza in thePlan of Agua Prieta in 1920. Following the interim presidency ofAdolfo de la Huerta, elections were held, and Obregón was elected for a four-year presidential term. His government accommodated many elements of Mexican society except the most conservative clergy and wealthy landowners.[81]
He was able to implement policies emerging from the revolutionary struggle successfully; in particular, the successful policies were the integration of urban, organized labor into political life viaCROM, the improvement of education and Mexican cultural production underJosé Vasconcelos, the movement ofland reform, and the steps taken toward instituting women's civil rights. His main tasks in the presidency were consolidating state power in the central government and curbing regional strongmen (caudillos), obtaining diplomatic recognition from the United States, and managing the presidential succession in 1924 when his term ended.[82] His administration began constructing what one scholar called "an enlightened despotism, a ruling conviction that the state knew what ought to be done and needed plenary powers to fulfill its mission."[83] After the nearly decade-long violence of the Mexican Revolution, reconstruction in the hands of a strong central government offered stability and a path of renewed modernization.
Obregón knew his regime needed to secure recognition in the United States. With the promulgation of theMexican Constitution of 1917, the Mexican government was empowered to expropriate natural resources. The U.S. had considerable business interests in Mexico, especially oil, and the threat of Mexican economic nationalism to big oil companies meant that diplomatic recognition could hinge on Mexican compromise in implementing the constitution. 1923, when the Mexican presidential elections were on the horizon, the two governments signed theBucareli Treaty. The treaty resolved questions about foreign oil interests in Mexico, largely favoring U.S. interests, but Obregón's government gained U.S. diplomatic recognition. With that, arms and ammunition began flowing to revolutionary armies loyal to Obregón.[84]
Plutarco Elías Calles politician and revolutionary general who served as President of Mexico from 1924 to 1928, known for his role in shaping modern Mexico through reforms and the consolidation of state power.
Since Obregón had named his fellow Sonoran general, Plutarco Elías Calles, as his successor, Obregón was imposing a "little known nationally and unpopular with many generals,"[84] thereby foreclosing the ambitions of fellow revolutionaries, particularly Adolfo de la Huerta. De la Huerta staged a serious rebellion against Obregón but was suppressed with aid from the United States. Fifty-four former Obregonistas were shot in the event.[85] Vasconcelos resigned from Obregón's cabinet as minister of education.
Although the Constitution of 1917 had stronger anticlerical articles than the previous constitution, Obregón largely sidestepped confrontation with theMexican Catholic Church. Since political opposition parties were essentially banned, the Catholic Church "filled the political void and played the part of a substitute opposition."[86]
The1924 presidential election was not a demonstration of free and fair elections, but the incumbent Obregón could not stand for re-election, thereby acknowledging that revolutionary principle. He completed his presidential term still alive, the first since Porfirio Díaz. Candidate Plutarco Elías Calles embarked on one of the first populist presidential campaigns in the nation's history, calling for land reform and promising equal justice, more education, additional labor rights, and democratic governance.[87] Calles tried to fulfill his promises during his populist phase (1924–26) and a repressive anti-clerical phase (1926–28). Calles, a vehement anticlerical, took on the church as an institution when he succeeded to the presidency, bringing about violent, bloody, and protracted conflict known as theCristero War.
The Cristero War was a conflict that arose in response to the enforcement of secularist andanti-clerical provisions of theMexican Constitution of 1917 and the enactment of additional anti-clerical laws by PresidentPlutarco Elías Calles's government known asCalles Law.[88] The rebellions began early in 1927, concentrated in theBajío region of Mexico,[89] with the rebels calling themselvesCristeros because they felt they were fighting for Jesus Christ. The laity stepped into the vacuum created by the removal of priests.[90] The Cristero War was resolved diplomatically, largely with the help of the U.S. Ambassador,Dwight Morrow.[91]
The conflict claimed about 250,000 lives, including civilians and Cristeros killed during raids after the war's end.[92] As promised in the diplomatic resolution, the anti-clerical laws remained on the books, but the federal government made no organized attempt to enforce them. Under PresidentLázaro Cárdenas, the Calles Law was repealed in 1938.[93]
Logo of thePartido Nacional Revolucionario, with the colors of the Mexican flag
After Calles' presidential term ended in 1928, former president Alvaro Obregón won the presidency, but he was assassinated immediately after the July election, leaving a power vacuum. Revolutionary generals and others in the power elite agreed that Congress should appoint an interim president, and new elections were held in 1928. In his final address to Congress on 1 September 1928, President Calles declared the end of strongman rule, a ban on Mexican presidents serving again in that office, and that Mexico was now entering an age of rule by institutions and laws.[94] Congress choseEmilio Portes Gil to serve as interim president. Calles became the power behind the presidency in this period, known as theMaximato.
Calles created a more permanent solution to presidential succession by founding the National Revolutionary Party (PNR) in 1929. The party brought together regionalcaudillos and integrated labor organizations and peasant leagues in a party that could better manage the political process. For the six-year term that Obregón was to serve, three presidents held office: Emilio Portes Gil,Pascual Ortiz Rubio, andAbelardo L. Rodríguez. In 1934, the PNR chose Calles-supporterLázaro Cárdenas, a revolutionary general with a political power base in Michoacan, as the candidate of the PNR for the Mexican presidency. After an initial period of acquiescence to Calles's role in intervening in the presidency, Cárdenas out-maneuvered his former patron and eventually sent him into exile. Cárdenas reformed the PNR structure, creating the PRM (Partido Revolucionario Mexicano), the Mexican Revolutionary Party, which included the army as a party sector. He had convinced most of the remaining revolutionary generals to hand over their armies to the Mexican Army; some thus consider the date of the PRM party's foundation to be the end of the Revolution. The party was re-structured again in 1946 and renamed theInstitutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and held power continuously until 2000. After establishing itself as the ruling party, the PRI monopolized all the political branches: it did not lose a senate seat until 1988 or a gubernatorial race until 1989.[95]
Lázaro Cárdenas was hand-picked by Calles as the successor to the presidency in 1934. Cárdenas managed to unite the different forces in the PRI and set the rules that allowed his party to rule unchallenged for decades without internal fights. He nationalized the oil industry (on 18 March 1938) and the electricity industry, created theNational Polytechnic Institute and implemented extensiveland reform and the distribution of free textbooks to children.[96] In 1936 he exiled Calles, the last general with dictatorial ambitions, thereby removing the army from power.
On the eve ofWorld War II, theCárdenas administration (1934–1940) was stabilizing, and consolidating control over, a Mexican nation that, for decades, had been in revolutionary flux,[97] and Mexicans were beginning to interpret the European battle between the communists and fascists, especially theSpanish Civil War, through their unique revolutionary lens. As he remained neutral, whether Mexico would side with the United States was unclear duringLázaro Cárdenas 's rule. "Capitalists, businessmen, Catholics, and middle-class Mexicans who opposed many of the reforms implemented by the revolutionary government sided with the Spanish Falange".[98][99]
Nazi propagandist Arthur Dietrich and his team of agents in Mexico successfully manipulated editorials and coverage of Europe by paying hefty subsidies to Mexican newspapers, including the widely read dailiesExcélsior andEl Universal.[100] The situation became even more problematic for the Allies when major oil companies boycotted Mexican oil followingLázaro Cárdenas' nationalization of the oil industry andexpropriation of all corporate oil properties in 1938,[101] which severed Mexico's access to its traditional markets and led Mexico to sell its oil to Germany and Italy.[102]
Most historians consider 1940 a major dividing line between the era of military violence and then political consolidation by military leaders of the Revolution and a post-1940 period of political stability and economic growth.[103]
Manuel Ávila Camacho, Cárdenas's successor, presided over a "bridge" between the revolutionary era and the era of machine politics under PRI that lasted until 2000. Ávila Camacho, moving away from nationalistic autarky (economic self-sufficiency), proposed creating a favorable climate for international investment, a policy favored nearly two generations earlier by Madero. Ávila's regime froze wages, repressed strikes, and persecuted dissidents with a law prohibiting the "crime of social dissolution." During this period, the PRI shifted to the right and abandoned much of the radical nationalism of the Cárdenas era.Miguel Alemán Valdés, Ávila Camacho's successor, amended Article 27 to limit land reform, protecting large landowners.[104]
Mexico played a relatively minor military role inWorld War II. Relations between Mexico and the U.S. had been warming in the 1930s, particularly after U.S. PresidentFranklin Delano Roosevelt implemented theGood Neighbor Policy toward Latin American countries.[105] Even before the outbreak of hostilities between the Axis and Allied powers, Mexico aligned itself firmly with the United States, initially as a proponent of "belligerent neutrality," which the U.S. followed before theAttack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941.[106]
Mexico sanctioned businesses and individuals identified by the U.S. government as being supporters of the Axis powers; in August 1941, Mexico broke off economic ties with Germany, then recalled its diplomats from Germany, and closed the German consulates in Mexico.[106] TheConfederation of Mexican Workers (CTM) and theConfederation of Mexican Peasants (CNC) staged massive rallies in support of the government.[106] Mexico's biggest contributions to the war effort were in vital war equipment and labor. There was heavy demand for its exports, which created a degree of prosperity.[107]
In Mexico and throughout Latin America, Roosevelt's "Good Neighbor Policy" was necessary at such a delicate time. Much work had already been accomplished between the U.S. and Mexico to create more harmonious relations between the two countries, including the settlement of U.S. citizen claims against the Mexican government, initially and ineffectively negotiated by the binationalAmerican-Mexican Claims Commission, but then in direct bilateral negotiations between the two governments.[108] The U.S. government did not intervene on behalf of U.S. oil companies during theMexican oil expropriation, allowing Mexico to assert its economic sovereignty but also benefiting the U.S. by easing antagonism in Mexico.[109]
The Good Neighbor Policy led to the Douglas-Weichers Agreement in June 1941 that secured the sale of Mexican oil to the United States,[110] and theGlobal Settlement in November 1941 that ended oil company demands on generous terms for the Mexicans, an example of the U.S. putting national security concerns over the interests of U.S. oil companies.[111] When it became clear in other parts of Latin America that the U.S. and Mexico had substantially resolved their differences, the other Latin American countries were more amenable to support the U.S. and Allied efforts against the Axis.[108]
Following losses of oil ships in theGulf, thePotrero del Llano andFaja de Oro, to German submarines, the Mexican government declared war on theAxis powers on May 30, 1942.[112] Perhaps the most famous fighting unit in theMexican Armed Forces was theEscuadrón 201, also known as theAztec Eagles.[113] TheEscuadrón 201 was the first Mexican military unit trained for overseas combat and fought during theliberation of the Philippines, working with the U.S.Fifth Air Force in the last year of the war.[113] Although most Latin American countries eventually entered the war on the Allies' side, Mexico andBrazil were the only Latin American nations that sent troops to fight overseas during World War II.
With so many draftees, the U.S. needed farm workers. TheBracero Program allowed 290,000 Mexicans to work temporarily on American farms, especially in Texas.[114]
The logo ofNacional Financiera (NAFIN), the state development bank.
During the next four decades, Mexico experienced high rates of economic growth, an achievement some historians call "El Milagro Mexicano" theMexican Miracle. A key component of this phenomenon was the achievement of political stability, which, since the founding of the dominant party, has ensured stable presidential succession and control of potentially dissident labor and peasant sections through participation in the party structure. In 1938,Lázaro Cárdenas used Article 27 of the Constitution of 1917, which gavesubsoil rights to the Mexican government to expropriate foreign oil companies.[115]
It was a popular move but did not generate further major expropriations. With Cárdenas's hand-picked successor,Manuel Avila Camacho, Mexico moved closer to the U.S. as an ally in World War II. This alliance brought significant economic gains to Mexico. By supplying raw and finished war materials to the Allies, Mexico built up significant assets that, in the post-war period, could be translated into sustained growth and industrialization.[116]
After 1946, the government took a rightward turn under PresidentMiguel Alemán, who repudiated the policies of previous presidents. Mexico pursued industrial development throughimport substitution industrialization and tariffs against imports. Mexican industrialists, including a group in Monterrey, Nuevo León, and wealthy business people in Mexico City, joined Alemán's coalition. Alemán tamed the labor movement in favor of policies supporting industrialists.[117][118]
Financing industrialization came from private entrepreneurs, such as the Monterrey group, but the government funded a significant amount through its development bank,Nacional Financiera [es]. Foreign capital through direct investment was another source of funding for industrialization, much of it from the United States.[119] Government policies transferred economic benefits from the countryside to the city by keeping agricultural prices artificially low, which made food cheap for city-dwelling industrial workers and other urban consumers.[120]
Commercial agriculture expanded with the growth of exports to the U.S. of high-value fruits and vegetables, with rural credit going to large producers, not peasant agriculture. In particular, the creation of high-yield seeds during theGreen Revolution aimed at expanding commercially oriented, highly mechanizedagribusiness.[121]
Although PRI administrations achieved economic growth and relative prosperity for almost three decades after World War II, the party's management of the economy led to several crises. Political unrest grew in the late 1960s, culminating in theTlatelolco massacre in 1968. Economic crises swept the country in 1976 and 1982, leading to the nationalization of Mexico's banks, which were blamed for economic problems (La Década Perdida).[123]
On both occasions, the Mexican peso was devalued, and until 2000, it was normal to expect a big devaluation and recession at the end of each presidential term. The"December Mistake" crisis threw Mexico into economic turmoil—the worst recession in over half a century.
On 19 September 1985, an earthquake (8.1 on theRichter scale) struckMichoacán, inflicting severe damage onMexico City. Estimates of the number of dead range from 6,500 to 30,000.[124] Public anger at the PRI's mishandling of relief efforts combined with the ongoing economic crisis led to a substantial weakening of the PRI. As a result, for the first time since the 1930s, the PRI began to face serious electoral challenges.
A phenomenon of the 1980s was the growth of organized political opposition to de facto one-party rule by the PRI. TheNational Action Party (PAN) was founded in 1939. Until the 1980s, a marginal political party and not a serious contender for power began to gain voters, particularly in Northern Mexico. They made gains in local elections initially, but in 1986, the PAN candidate for the governorship of Chihuahua had a good chance of winning.[125]
The Catholic Church was constitutionally forbidden from participating in electoral politics, but the archbishop urged voters not to abstain from the elections. The PRI intervened and upended what would likely have been a victory for the PAN. Although the PRI's candidate became governor, the widespread perception of electoral fraud, criticism by the archbishop of Chihuahua, and a more mobilized electorate made the victory costly to the PRI.[126]
Candidates in the1988 Mexican general election wereCarlos Salinas de Gortari (PRI);Cuauhtemoc Cárdenas, who broke with the PRI and ran as a candidate of the Democratic Current, later forming theParty of the Democratic Revolution (PRD);[127] and the PAN candidateManuel Clouthier. Irregularities on a massive scale marked the election. During the vote count, the government computers were said to have crashed; one observer said, "For the ordinary citizen, it was not the computer network but the Mexican political system that had crashed."[128]
When the computers were said to be running again after a considerable delay, the election results they recorded were an extremely narrow victory for Salinas (50.7%), Cárdenas (31.1%), and Clouthier (16.8%). Cárdenas was widely seen to have won the election,[clarification needed], but Salinas was declared the winner. There might have been violence in the wake of such fraudulent results, but Cárdenas did not call for it, "sparing the country a possible civil war."[129]
Years later, former Mexican PresidentMiguel de la Madrid (1982–88) was quoted inTheNew York Times stating that the results were indeed fraudulent.[130]His presidency was marked by ambitious economic reforms, including the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with the United States and Canada in 1994. Despite these challenges, Salinas' presidency is often remembered for its economic transformation and its lasting impact on Mexico's position in the global economy.
In 1995, PresidentErnesto Zedillo faced theMexican peso crisis. There were public demonstrations in Mexico City and a constant military presence after the 1994 rise of theZapatista Army of National Liberation in Chiapas.[131] Despite the initial turmoil, Zedillo implemented austerity measures and structural reforms that helped stabilize the economy and restore investor confidence.
The United States intervened rapidly to stem the economic crisis, first by buying pesos in the open market and then by granting assistance in the form of $50 billion in loan guarantees. The peso stabilized at 6 pesos per dollar. By 1996, the economy was growing, and in 1997, Mexico repaid all U.S. Treasury loans ahead of schedule.
Zedillo oversaw political and electoral reforms that reduced the PRI's hold on power. After the1988 election, which was strongly disputed, the IFE (Instituto Federal Electoral –Federal Electoral Institute) was created in the early 1990s to oversee elections.
Three world leaders: (background, left to right) Mexican PresidentCarlos Salinas de Gortari, U.S. PresidentGeorge H. W. Bush, and Canadian Prime MinisterBrian Mulroney, observe the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Mexico has a free market economy that entered theTrillion dollar club in 2010.[133][134] It contains a mixture of modern and outmoded industry and agriculture, increasingly dominated by the private sector. Recent administrations have expanded competition in sea ports, railroads, telecommunications, electricity generation, natural gas distribution, and airports.
Per capita income is one-quarter that of the United States; income distribution remains highly unequal. Trade with the United States and Canada has tripled since the implementation of NAFTA. Mexico has free-trade agreements with more than 50 countries.[135]
Accused many times of electoral fraud, the PRI held almost all public offices until the end of the 20th century. Not until the 1980s did the PRI lose its firststate governorship, an event that marked the beginning of the party's loss of hegemony.[136][137]
Emphasizing the need to upgrade infrastructure, modernize the tax system and labor laws, integrate with the U.S. economy, and allow private investment in the energy sector,Vicente Fox Quesada, the candidate of theNational Action Party (PAN),was elected president of Mexico on 2 July 2000, ending PRI's 71-year-long control of the office. Though Fox's victory was partly due to popular discontent with decades of unchallenged PRI hegemony, Fox's opponent, Francisco Labastida, conceded defeat on the night of the election—a first in Mexican history.[138] A further sign of the quickening of Mexican democracy was the fact that PAN failed to win a majority in both chambers ofCongress. This situation prevented Fox from implementing his reform pledges. Nonetheless, the transfer of power in 2000 was quick and peaceful.
Fox was a strong candidate but an ineffective president weakened by PAN's minority status in Congress. Historian Philip Russell summarizes:
Marketed on television, Fox made a far better candidate than he did president. He failed to take charge and provide cabinet leadership, failed to set priorities, and disregarded alliance building... By 2006, political scientistSoledad Loaeza noted, "the eager candidate became a reluctant president who avoided tough choices and appeared hesitant and unable to hide the weariness caused by the responsibilities and constraints of the office." ...He had little success in fighting crime. Even though he maintained the macroeconomic stability inherited from his predecessor, economic growth barely exceeded the rate of population increase. Similarly, the lack of fiscal reform left tax collection at a rate similar to Haiti's... Finally, during Fox's administration, only 1.4 million formal-sector jobs were created, leading to massive immigration to the United States and an explosive increase in informal employment.[139]
Fox initiated policies to attract foreign investment, promote trade, and modernize Mexico's economy, although progress in these areas was mixed. Additionally, Fox's presidency was notable for its emphasis on improving relations with the United States and advocating for comprehensive immigration reform.
On his first day as president, Calderón raised the salaries of theFederal Police and theMexican Armed Forces despite establishing a cap on the salaries of high-ranking public servants.
Calderón also pursued economic reforms and initiatives to promote competitiveness and investment in sectors such asenergy andinfrastructure. However, his administration was criticized for its handling of the economy, and some pointed to persistent issues such asunemployment and inequality.
El Chapo in US custody after his extradition from Mexico.
Under President Calderón (2006–2012), the government began waging a war on regional drug mafias.[141] This conflict has resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of Mexicans and the drug mafias continue to gain power. Mexico has been a major transit and drug-producing nation: an estimated 90% of thecocaine smuggled into the United States every year passes through Mexico.[133]
Fueled by the increasing demand for drugs in the United States, Mexico has become a major supplier of heroin, producer, and distributor ofMDMA, and the largest foreign supplier of cannabis andmethamphetamine to the U.S. market. Major drug syndicates control the majority of drug trafficking in Mexico, and Mexico is a significant money-laundering center.[133]
After theFederal Assault Weapons Ban expired in the U.S. on September 13, 2004, Mexican drug cartels have begun acquiringassault weapons in the United States.[142] The result is thatdrug cartels have now both more gun power, and more workforce due to the high unemployment in Mexico.[143]
Former Secretary of DefenseSalvador Cienfuegos was arrested in the U.S. for cartel ties in 2020 but sent back to Mexico after charges were dropped amid disputed diplomatic pressure.[146][147][148][149][150]
On July 1, 2012, Enrique Peña Nietowas elected president of Mexico with 38% of the vote. He is a former governor of the state of Mexico and a member of the PRI. His election returned the PRI to power after 12 years of PAN rule. He was officially sworn into office on December 1, 2012.[151]
ThePacto por México was a cross-party alliance that called for the accomplishment of 95 goals. It was signed on 2 December 2012 by the leaders of the three main political parties inChapultepec Castle. Some international pundits lauded the Pact as an example of solving political gridlock and effectively passing institutional reforms.[152][153][154] Among other legislation, it called for education reform, banking reform, fiscal reform and telecommunications reform, all of which were eventually passed.[155]
This pact was ultimately jeopardized when the center-right PAN and PRI pushed for a revaluation of, and end to, the monopoly of the state-owned petroleum company,Pemex.[citation needed] This facilitated the opening of Mexico's energy sector to private investment, and allowing foreign companies to participate in oil exploration and production.
Thedisappearance of 43 students from the Ayotzinapa Rural Teachers' College in 2014 became a symbol of the country's ongoing struggle with violence, corruption, and impunity.
On July 1, 2018,Andrés Manuel López Obrador waselected president with 30,112,109 votes (53.19% of the total votes cast.) Lopez Obrador is the leader of theNational Regeneration Movement and he headed theJuntos Haremos Historia coalition.[156][157] Known for his populist policies, focus on combating corruption, and promoting social welfare programs aimed at addressing poverty and inequality in the country.
On 1 December 2018, López Obrador was sworn in as Mexico's first leftist president in decades.[158] The administration has had to contend with thecoronavirus pandemic.[citation needed] AMLO made his first trip outside the country to travel to Washington D.C. to sign the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.[159] Has been a prominent figure in Mexican politics for decades, known for his advocacy for the marginalized, his nationalist stance on economic issues, and his criticism ofneoliberal policies.
His presidency was marked by efforts to reduce violence, stimulate economic growth, and promote social programs, while also facing challenges such as managing relations with the United States and addressing criticism over his administration's approach to governance and policy implementation.
In June 2021midterm elections, López Obrador's left-leaning coalition maintained a simple majority, but López Obrador failed to secure the two-thirds congressional supermajority.[160]
From January 2020 to March 2022, Mexico was greatly impacted byCOVID-19 pandemic andDeltacron hybrid variant, which marks the beginning of a pandemic in the country that caused over 325,000 deaths, the second highest mortality toll inNorth America (BehindUnited States).[161] The country has experienced waves of infections and vaccination efforts have been ongoing, with a significant portion of the population receiving at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Economic recovery efforts have been underway, focusing on sectors heavily impacted by the pandemic, such as tourism and small businesses. The government has been working on addressing healthcare disparities and strengthening public health infrastructure to better respond to future health crises.
Claudia Sheinbaum, López Obrador's political successor, won the2024 presidential election in a landslide and upon taking office in October became the first woman and the first person of Jewish descent to be elected president of Mexico.[162][163] She was sworn in as president on 1 October 2024.[164]
^ab"Teotihuacan".Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. October 2001.Archived from the original on 2020-05-19. Retrieved2011-06-09.
^Leon-Portilla, Miguel (1963).Aztec Thought and Culture: A Study of the Ancient Náhuatl Mind. Translated by Davis, Jack E. University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 6,161–162.
^Levy, Buddy (2008).Conquistador: Hernán Cortés, King Montezuma, and the Last Stand of the Aztecs. Bantam Books. p. 106.ISBN978-0-553-38471-0.
^Robert Ricard,The Spiritual Conquest of Mexico: An Essay on the Apostolate and the Evangelizing Methods of the Mendicant Orders of New Spain, 1523–1572, Trans. by Lesley Byrd Simpson. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966. First published in French in the 1930s.
^Ida Altman, et al.,The Early History of Greater Mexico, Pearson, 2003 pp. 117–125.
^Ida Altman, et al.,The Early History of Greater Mexico, Pearson, 2003, p. 145.
^Michael C. Meyer, William L. Sherman, and Susan M. Deeds,The Course of Mexican History (2002), p 413
^Coatsworth, John H., "Obstacles to Economic Growth in Nineteenth-Century Mexico,"American Historical Review vol. 83, No. 1 (Feb. 1978), pp. 80–100
^Haber, Stephen. "Assessing the Obstacles to Industrialisation: The Mexican Economy, 1830–1940,"Journal of Latin American Studies, 24#1 (1992), pp. 1–32
^Health, Hilarie J., "British Merchant Houses in Mexico, 1821–1860: Conforming Business Practices and Ethics,"Hispanic American Historical Review 73#2 (1993), pp. 261–290onlineArchived 2020-06-05 at theWayback Machine
^Bazant, Jan. "From Independence to the Liberal Republic, 1821–1867" inMexico Since Independence,Leslie Bethell, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991, pp. 1–3
^Bazant, Jan. "From Independence to the Liberal Republic, 1821–1867" inMexico Since Independence. Leslie Bethell, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991, pp. 2–4.
^Bazant, "From Independence to the Liberal Republic, 1821–1867", pp. 4–8
^Scheina, Robert L. (2002)Santa Anna: a curse upon Mexico Brassey's, Washington, D.C.,ISBN1-57488-405-0
^Pani, Erika. "Revolution of Ayutla" inEncyclopedia of Mexico Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn 1997, p. 119.
^Knowlton, Robert J., "Plan of Ayutla" inEncyclopedia of Latin American History and Culture, vol. 4, p. 420. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons 1996.
^Pani, Erika. "Republicans and Monarchists, 1848–1867" inA Companion to Mexican History and Culture, William H. Beezley, ed. Wiley-Blackwell 2011, pp. 280–283.
^John W. Kitchens, "Some Considerations on the "Rurales" of Porfirian Mexico,"Journal of Inter-American Studies, (1967) 9#3 pp 441–455in JSTORArchived 2016-09-16 at theWayback Machine
^abCoatsworth, "Obstacles to Economic Growth in Nineteenth-Century Mexico," p. 81
^abHarris, Charles H. III; Sadler, Louis R. (2009).The Secret War in El Paso: Mexican Revolutionary Intrigue, 1906–1920. Albuquerque, New Mexico: University of New Mexico Press. pp. 1–17, 213.ISBN978-0-8263-4652-0.
^Obrador, Andrés Manuel López (2014).Neoporfirismo: Hoy como ayer. Berkeley, CA: Grijalbo.ISBN978-607-31-2326-6.
^Passananti, Thomas P. (2008). "Dynamizing the Economy in a façon irréguliére: A New Look at Financial Politics in Porfirian Mexico".Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos.24 (1):1–29.doi:10.1525/msem.2008.24.1.1.
^Cahill, Kevin J. (1998). "The U.S. bank panic of 1907 and the Mexican depression of 1908–1909".Historian.60 (4):795–811.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6563.1998.tb01416.x.
^Schell, Patience A. (2004). "Nationalizing Children through Schools and Hygiene: Porfirian and Revolutionary Mexico City".The Americas.60 (4):559–587.doi:10.1353/tam.2004.0072.JSTOR4144491.S2CID145354431.
^John Tutino, "From Involution to Revolution in Mexico: Liberal Development, Patriarchy, and Social Violence in the Central Highlands, 1870–1915,"History Compass (May 2008) 6#3 pp 796–842.
^Friedrich Katz,The Secret War in Mexico: Europe, the United States, and the Mexican Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1981.
^Womack, John Jr. "The Mexican Revolution" inMexico Since Independence, ed. Leslie Bethell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991, p. 125
^Christon Archer, "Military, 1821–1914" inEncyclopedia of Mexico, vol. 2, p. 910. Chicago: Fitzroy and Dearborn 1997.
^Mark Wasserman, "You Can Teach An Old Revolutionary Historiography New Tricks Regions, Popular Movements, Culture, and Gender in Mexico, 1820–1940,"Latin American Research Review (2008) 43#2 260–271in Project MUSE
^Jean Meyer, "Revolution and Reconstruction in the 1920s" inMexico Since Independence, Leslie Bethell, ed. New York: Cambridge University Press 1991, p. 201.
^Thomas Benjamin, "Rebuilding the Nation" inThe Oxford History of Mexico, Michael C. Meyer and William Beezley, eds. New York: Oxford University Press 2000, p. 471.
^Peter H. Smith, "Mexico Since 1946: Dynamics of an Authoritarian Regime" inMexico Since Independence, Leslie Bethell, ed. New York: Cambridge University Press 1991, 321, 324–25.
^John W. Sherman, "The 'Mexican Miracle' and Its Collapse" inThe Oxford History of Mexico, Michael C. Meyer and William H. Beezley, eds. New York: Oxford University Press 2000, pp. 576–77, 583.
^Ávila Ruiz, Daniel Gabriel (July 18, 2019)."Resultados elecciones 2018" [Election results, 1018] (in Spanish). El Sol de Mexico. RetrievedMarch 10, 2019.
Meyer, Michael C., William L. Sherman, and Susan M. Deeds.The Course of Mexican History (7th ed. Oxford U.P., 2002)online editionArchived 2011-02-02 at theWayback Machine
Werner, Michael S., ed.Encyclopedia of Mexico: History, Society & Culture (2 vol 1997) 1440 pp . Articles by multiple authorsonline editionArchived 2010-01-24 at theWayback Machine
Werner, Michael S., ed. Concise Encyclopedia of Mexico (2001) 850 pp; a selection of previously published articles by multiple authors.
Anna, Timothy.The Fall of Royal Government in Mexico City University of Nebraska Press (1978)
Anna, Timothy.Forging Mexico, 1821–1835 University of Nebraska Press (2001)
Coatsworth, John H.Growth against Development: The Economic Impact of Railroads in Porfirian Mexico (1980)
Coatsworth, John H (1978). "Obstacles to Economic Growth in Nineteenth-Century Mexico".American Historical Review.83 (1):80–100.doi:10.2307/1865903.JSTOR1865903.
Henderson, Timothy J.A Glorious Defeat: Mexico and Its War with the United States (2008)excerpt and text search
Riguzzi, Paolo (2009). "From Globalisation to Revolution? The Porfirian Political Economy: An Essay on Issues and Interpretations".Journal of Latin American Studies.41 (2):347–368.doi:10.1017/S0022216X09005598.S2CID206241322.
*Rodríguez O., Jaime E., ed.The Independence of Mexico and the Creation of the New Nation. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center Publications 69, 1989.
Rodríguez O., Jaime E."We Are Now the True Spaniards": Sovereignty, Revolution, Independence, and the Emergence of the Federal Republic of Mexico, 1808–1824 (2012)excerpt and text search
Scholes, Walter V.Mexican Politics during the Juárez Regime 1855–1872 (University of Missouri Press, 1957)
Sinkin, Richard N.The Mexican Reform, 1856–1876: A Study in Liberal Nation-Building (University of Texas Press, 1979)
Stevens, Donald Fithian.Origins of Instability in Early Republican Mexico. Duke University Press 1991.ISBN0-8223-1136-4
Tenenbaum, Barbara.The Politics of Penury: Debts and Taxes in Mexico, 1821–1856 University of New Mexico Press (1986)
Tutino, John.From Insurrection to Revolution in Mexico: Social bases to agrarian violence, 1750–1940 Princeton University Press (1986)
Van Young, Eric.The Other Rebellion : popular violence, ideology, and the Mexican struggle for independence, 1810–1821 Stanford University Press (2001)
Gonzales, Michael J.The Mexican Revolution, 1910–1940 (2002)
Hart, John Mason.Empire and Revolution: The Americans in Mexico Since the Civil War. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 2002.
Katz, Friedrich.The Life and Times of Pancho Villa. Stanford: Stanford University Press 1998.
Knight, Alan.The Mexican Revolution, Volume 1: Porfirians, Liberals, and Peasants (1990);The Mexican Revolution, Volume 2: Counter-revolution and Reconstruction (1990); a standard scholarly history
Knight, Alan. "The Mexican Revolution: Bourgeois? Nationalist? Or Just a 'Great Rebellion'?"Bulletin of Latin American Research (1985) 4#2 pp. 1–37in JTSOR
Ruiz, Ramón Eduardo.The Great Rebellion: Mexico, 1905–1924 (1980).
Snodgrass, Michael.Deference and Defiance in Monterrey: Workers, Paternalism, and Revolution in Mexico, 1890–1950. (Cambridge University Press, 2003)ISBN0-521-81189-9.
Tenorio-Trillo, Mauricio.I Speak of the City: Mexico City at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. Chicago: University of California 2012.
Vaughan, Mary Kay.Cultural Politics in Revolution: Teachers, Peasants, and Schools in Mexico, 1930–1940. Tucson: University of Arizona Press 1997.
Womack, John.Zapata and the Mexican Revolution (1968)
Alegre, Robert F.Railroad radicals in Cold War Mexico: Gender, class, and memory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, [2013]
Bratzel, John, et al. eds.Latin America during World War II (2006) ch 2
Camp, Roderic Ai.Politics in Mexico: The Democratic Consolidation (5th ed. 2006)
Coerver, Don M., Suzanne B. Pasztor, and Robert Buffington, eds.Mexico Today: An Encyclopedia of Contemporary History and Culture (2004) 621 ppexcerpt and text search
Contreras, Joseph.In the Shadow of the Giant: The Americanization of Modern Mexico (2009)excerpt and text search
Dent, David W.Encyclopedia of Modern Mexico (2002); since 1940; 376 pp
Hamilton, Nora.Mexico, Political Social and Economic Evolution (2011)
Niblo, Stephen R.Mexico in the 1940s: Modernity, Politics, and Corruption (1999)
Preston, Julia, and Samuel Dillon.Opening Mexico: The Making of a Democracy (2005) in-depth narrative by American journalists on post 1960 era.excerpt and text search
Boyer, Christopher R., ed.Land between Waters: Environmental Histories of Modern Mexico (U. of Arizona Press, 2012). 328 pp.online review
Brienen, Rebecca P., and Margaret A. Jackson, es.Invasion and Transformation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Conquest of Mexico (2008)
Chorba, Carrie C.Mexico, From Mestizo to Multicultural: National Identity and Recent Representations of the Conquest (2007)excerpt and text search
Cox, Edward Godfrey (1938)."Mexico".Reference Guide to the Literature of Travel. University of Washington publications. Language and literaturev. 9–10, 12. Vol. 2: New World. Seattle: University of Washington.hdl:2027/mdp.39015049531455 – via Hathi Trust.
Díaz-Maldonado, Rodrigo. "National Identity Building in Mexican Historiography during the Nineteenth century: An Attempt at Synthesis."Storia della storiografia 70.2 (2016): 73–93.
Gallegos, Laura Olivia Machuca, and Alejandro Tortolero Villaseñor. "From haciendas to rural elites: Agriculture and economic development in the historiography of rural Mexico."Historia agraria: Revista de agricultura e historia rural 81 (2020): 31–62.online
Garrigan, Shelley E.Collecting Mexico: Museums, Monuments, and the Creation of National Identity(University of Minnesota Press; 2012) 233 pp; scholarly analysis of Mexico's self-image, 1867–1910, using public monuments, fine-arts collecting, museums, and Mexico's representation at the Paris world's fair
Knight, Alan (2006). "Patterns and Prescriptions in Mexican Historiography".Bulletin of Latin American Research.25 (3):340–366.doi:10.1111/j.0261-3050.2006.00202.x.
Knight, Alan (1985). "The Mexican Revolution: Bourgeois? Nationalist? Or Just a 'Great Rebellion'?".Bulletin of Latin American Research.4 (2):1–37.doi:10.2307/3338313.JSTOR3338313.
Krauze, Enrique.Mexico: Biography of Power. Harper Perennial (1998)
Lomnitz, Claudio.Deep Mexico, Silent Mexico: An Anthropology of Nationalism (University of Minnesota Press 2001)
Pick, Zuzana M.Constructing the Image of the Mexican Revolution: Cinema and the Archive (University of Texas Press, 2011)online review
Mexico: From Empire to Revolution –-Photographs from the Getty Research Institute's collections exploring Mexican history and culture though images produced between 1857 and 1923.