 | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
 | |
| Author | Guillaume Thomas Raynal Denis Diderot Paul Henri Thiry d'Holbach Jacques-André Naigeon Jean de Pechméja Jean-François de Saint-Lambert Joseph-Louis Lagrange Jacques-André Naigeon and others |
|---|---|
| Original title | Histoire philosophique et politique des établissements et du commerce des Européens dans les deux Indes |
| Working title | Histoire des deux Indes |
| Genre | Encyclopaedia |
| Published | 1770 |
| Publication place | France |
TheHistoire philosophique et politique des établissements et du commerce des Européens dans les deux Indes, more often known simply asHistoire des deux Indes, is an encyclopaedia oncommerce betweenEurope and theFar East, Africa, and the Americas. It was published anonymously inAmsterdam in 1770 and attributed to AbbotGuillaume Thomas Raynal.[1] It achieved considerable popularity and went through numerous editions. The third edition, published in Geneva in 1780, wascensored in France the following year.[2]
TheHistoire des deux Indes filled a public need for knowledge in theAge of Enlightenment, answering questions that preoccupied the minds of those in the late 18th century, around the time of theFrench Revolution.
Raynal's idea was to write a history of European enterprises in the East Indies and theNew World, having observed the influence of the great explorations on European civilisation.
The work first discusses thePortuguese and theiroriental colonies, going on to give a history ofBritish andFrench enterprises, thenSpanish,Dutch, and other European powers, in the Orient. Next, it turns its attention to all of the various European conquests, losses, colonies and commerce in the Americas. European commerce with various coastal regions of Africa is discussed, mainly on slavery and particularly trans-Atlantic slave trade. Finally, there is a series of essays on religion, politics, war, commerce, moral philosophy,belles-lettres, and so on.[3]
TheHistoire des deux Indes lacks consistency in its style: Raynal limited himself to collecting articles provided by friends and pieces borrowed from existing published texts, without taking the trouble to rework them.
Although the book was published anonymously, some authors are known, if only in name.[4]
Proud of his work, Raynal sometimes forgot it was only as good as its contributors made it. This can be seen in the pieces supplied by a Dr Sanchez, the author onPortugal and its possessions in the East and West Indies. Pechméja once foundSébastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort reading theHistoire des deux Indes: "What have you found?", he asked. "I have just been reading an excellent piece, but it finishes with such an awful turn of phrase" (French:Je viens de lire un morceau excellent, mais qui se termine par une phrase pitoyable). "Let me see: you're right. I much think that Raynal writes is nonsense; he has added that phrase, the rest is mine". (French:Faites-moi donc voir; vous avez raison. Je pensais bien que Raynal ferait des sottises; il a ajouté cette phrase, le reste est de moi.) When Raynal left Paris, Chamford saidIl est fatigué de vivre avec son auteur ("He is tired of living with his author").
TheHistoire des deux Indes was a great success. In France, over thirty different editions were published between 1770 and 1787, and over fifty were published abroad. Abridged versions were published calledEsprit de Raynal ("Potted Raynal") andRaynal de la jeunesse ("Children's Raynal").Napoleon Bonaparte proclaimed himself a "willing disciple of Raynal" (French:zélé disciple de Raynal) and took the book with him on hisEgyptian campaign.Toussaint Louverture read the book and was especially inspired by a passage that predicted slave revolution in the West Indies.[7]Horace Walpole wrote toMarie Du Deffand: "It attacks all governments and all religions!" (French:Il attaque tous les gouvernements et toutes les religions!).Anne Robert Jacques Turgot heavily criticized the book in a letter toAndré Morellet:
Il est tantôt rigoriste commeRichardson, tantôt immoral commeHelvétius, tantôt enthousiaste des vertus douces et tendres, tantôt de la débauche, tantôt du courage féroce; traitant l’esclavage d’abominable et voulant des esclaves; déraisonnant en physique, déraisonnant en métaphysique et souvent en politique. Il ne résulte rien de son livre, sinon que l’auteur est un homme de beaucoup d’esprit, très instruit, mais qui n’a aucune idée arrêtée, et qui se laisse emporter par l’enthousiasme d’un jeune rhéteur. Il semble avoir pris à tâche de soutenir tous les paradoxes qui se sont présentés à lui dans ses lectures et dans ses rêves.
(He is sometimes dogmatic like Richardson, sometimes immoral like Helvetius, sometimes an enthusiast of sweet and tender virtues, sometimes of debauchery, sometimes of fierce courage; treating slavery as abominable and wanting slaves; unreasoning in physics, unreasoning in metaphysics and often in politics. Nothing comes out of his book, other than that the author is a man of much spirit, well educated, but who has not one firm idea, and who is carried away by the enthusiasm of a young rhetorician. He seems to have undertaken the task of upholding all the paradoxes that are presented to him in his readings and in his dreams.)
At the time, theHistoire des deux Indes was considered an encyclopaedia of the colonial age and the Bible ofanticolonialism in theAge of Enlightenment.
In 1780, Raynal produced the third edition of hisHistoire des deux Indes, which was characterised by bolder and more violent tirades than the previous two, and under his signature at the bottom of his portrait he added the inscription:Au défenseur de l’humanité, de la vérité, de la liberté ("In defence of humanity, truth, and freedom").
Louis XVI referred the book to theParlement of Paris for censorship, and also to the Church. It was banned, and burned by the public hangman on 29 May 1781. Declared a public enemy, Raynal was forced to leave France forPrussia, where he stayed the large part of his exile. He was allowed to return to France in 1787, on condition he did not enter Paris.
Today, scholar Jenny Mander notes that there are mixed feelings and overall confusion as to whetherHistoire des deux Indes is an anti-colonialist text since there are so many contradictions within the piece itself. On the one side, Raynal makes many statements that are against the overall inhumanity of Europeans and criticizes their seizing of land that is taken solely for European gain and leaves native people vulnerable. For these reasons, some do consider the text to be anti-colonialist. On the other hand, Raynal and his contributors still find slaves and slave labor as essential to the European economy, and they hold their plans[clarification needed] for instant emancipation for all slaves. With so many opposing opinions and several other writers who contributed their perspective, reception today is also clearly quite jumbled.[8]
Raynal heavily drew on from several contemporaneous works, including:
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link){{cite journal}}:Missing or empty|title= (help)[full citation needed]{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
