Hippolyte Adolphe Taine[a] (21 April 1828 – 5 March 1893) was a French historian, critic and philosopher. He was the chief theoretical influence onFrench naturalism, a major proponent ofsociological positivism and one of the first practitioners ofhistoricist criticism. Literary historicism as a critical movement has been said to originate with him.[2] Taine is also remembered for his attempts to provide a scientific account of literature.
Taine had a profound effect onFrench literature;Maurice Baring wrote in the1911Encyclopædia Britannica that "the tone which pervades the works ofZola,Bourget andMaupassant can be immediately attributed to the influence we call Taine's."[3] Out of the trauma of 1871, Taine has been said by one scholar to have "forged the architectural structure of modern French right-wing historiography."[4]
Taine was born inVouziers[5] into a fairly prosperous Ardennes family. His father, a lawyer, his uncle, and his grandfather encouraged him to read eclectically and offered him art and music lessons.
In 1841, Taine, then aged 13, lost his father[3] and was sent to a boarding school inParis, in the Institution Mathé, whose classes were conducted in theCollège Bourbon, located in the Batignolles district. He excelled in his studies and in 1847 obtained twoBaccalauréat degrees (Science and Philosophy) and received the honorary prize of the concours. He was awarded a first in the entrance examination of the letters section of theÉcole Normale Supérieure, to which he was admitted in November 1848.[3] Among the 24 students in the letters section, he is the classmate ofFrancisque Sarcey (who, in hisSouvenirs de jeunesse ("Memories of Youth") painted a portrait of young Hippolyte at the Rue d'Ulm campus) andEdmond About. But his attitude—he had a reputation for stubbornness—and his intellectual independence from then fashionable ideas— embodied byVictor Cousin—caused him to fail the examination for the nationalConcours d'Agrégation in philosophy in 1851.[6] After his essay onsensation was rejected, he abandoned the social sciences and turned to literature.[7] Having relocated outside Paris, he took up teaching positions in Nevers and Poitiers, during which time he continued his intellectual development. In 1853, he obtained a doctorate at the Sorbonne. His thesis,Essai sur les fables deLa Fontaine, would later be published in revised form in 1861. His subsequent "Essay on Livy" won a prize from theAcadémie Française in 1854.[8]
Taine adopted the positivist and scientist ideas that emerged around this time.
After defending his doctorate, he was automatically transferred toBesançon, but he refused this assignment. He settled first in Paris, where he enrolled in the medical school. From there, he went on a medical cure in thePyrénées in 1855, after which he wrote his famousVoyage aux Pyrénées, and began contributing numerous philosophical, literary, and historical articles to theRevue des deux Mondes and theJournal des débats, two major newspapers at the time.
He then took leave and travelled to England, where he spent six weeks. In 1863 he published hisHistory of English Literature in five volumes. BishopFélix Dupanloup, who had made it his career to oppose the election of agnostic intellectuals to the Académie Française, opposed the latter's awarding Taine a prize for this work.[9]In 1868, he married Thérèse Denuelle, daughter ofAlexandre-Dominique Denuelle. They had two children: Geneviève, wife of Louis Paul-Dubois, and Émile.
The immense success of his work allowed him, not only to live by his pen, but also to be named professor of the History of Art and Aesthetics at theEcole des Beaux Arts and professor of history and German at theÉcole spéciale militaire de Saint-Cyr.[10] He also taught atOxford (1871), where he was a Doctor in Law. In 1878, he was elected member of the Académie Française by 20 out of the 26 voters.[9]Taine was interested in many subjects, including art, literature, but especially history. Deeply shaken by thedefeat of 1870, as well as by the insurrection (and violent repression) of theParis Commune, Taine became fully devoted to his major historical work,The Origins of Contemporary France (1875–1893), on which he worked until his death, and which had a significant impact. Conceived by Taine with the aim of understanding the France of his day, the six-volume work analysed the causes of the French Revolution from an original, long-term perspective. In particular, Taine denounced the artificiality of the revolution's political constructions (the excessively abstract and rational ideas ofRobespierre, for example), which, in his mind, violently contradicted the natural and slow growth of the institutions of a State.
Taine's writing on the Revolution has remained popular in France. While admired by liberals likeAnatole France, it has served to inform the conservative view of the Revolution, since Taine rejected its principles[12][13] as well as theFrench Constitution of 1793, on account of their being dishonestly presented to the people.[14] He argued that theJacobins had responded to the centralisation of the ancien régime with even greater centralisation and favoured the individualism of his concepts of regionalism and nation. Taine's alternative torationalistliberalism influenced the social policies of theThird Republic.[15]
On the other hand, Taine has likewise received criticism from across the political spectrum, his politics beingidiosyncratic, complex, and difficult to define. Among others, attacks came from the Marxist historianGeorge Rudé, a specialist in the French Revolution and in 'history from below', on account of Taine's view of the crowd;[16] and from the FreudianPeter Gay who described Taine's reaction to the Jacobins as stigmatisation.[17] Yet,Alfred Cobban, who advocated a revisionist view of the French Revolution in opposition to the orthodox Marxist school, considered Taine's account of the French Revolution "a brilliant polemic".[18] Taine's vision of the Revolution stands in contrast to the Marxist interpretations that gained prominence in the 20th century, as in the works ofAlbert Mathiez,Georges Lefebvre, andAlbert Soboul, before the revisionist accounts ofAlfred Cobban andFrançois Furet.
Notwithstanding academic politics, whenAlphonse Aulard, a historian of the French Revolution, analysed Taine's text, he showed that the numerous facts and examples presented by Taine to support his account proved substantially correct; few errors were found by Aulard—fewer than in his own texts, as reported byAugustin Cochin.
In his other writings Taine is known for his attempt to provide a scientific account of literature, a project that has linked him to sociological positivists, although there were important differences. In his view, the work of literature was the product of the author's environment, and an analysis of that environment could yield a perfect understanding of that work; this stands in contrast with the view that the work of literature is the spontaneous creation of genius. Taine based his analysis on categories such as "nation", "environment" or "situation", and "time".[19][20] Armin Koller has written that in this Taine drew heavily from the philosopherJohann Gottfried Herder, although this has been insufficiently recognised,[21] while the Spanish writerEmilia Pardo Bazán has suggested that a crucial predecessor to Taine's idea wasGermaine de Staël's work on the relationship between art and society.[22] Nationalist literary movements and post-modern critics alike have made use of Taine's concepts, the former to argue for their unique and distinct place in literature[23] and the latter to deconstruct the texts with regards to the relationship between literature and social history.
Taine was criticised, including by Émile Zola who owed a great deal to him, for not taking sufficiently into account the individuality of the artist. Zola argued that an artist's temperament could lead him to make unique artistic choices distinct from the environment that shaped him, and gaveÉdouard Manet as a principal example.Gustave Lanson argued that Taine's environmental determinism could not account for his genius.[24]
Taine's influence on French intellectual culture and literature was significant. He had a special relationship, in particular, withÉmile Zola.[25] As critic Philip Walker says of Zola, "In page after page, including many of his most memorable writings, we are presented with what amounts to amimesis of the interplay between sensation andimagination which Taine studied at great length and out of which, he believed, emerges the world of the mind."[26] The Spanish philosopherMiguel de Unamuno was fascinated with both Zola and Taine early on (although he eventually concluded that Taine's influence on literature had been negative).[27]French fiction writersPaul Bourget andGuy de Maupassant were also heavily influenced by Taine.[3]
Taine shared a correspondence with the philosopherFriedrich Nietzsche, who later referred to him inBeyond Good and Evil as "the first of living historians".[28] He was also the subject ofStefan Zweig's doctoral thesis, "The Philosophy of Hippolyte Taine."[29] Taine was also read byPeter Kropotkin, who described him as truly understanding the French Revolution, because he "studied the movements preceding the revolution of July 14," or as he quoted Taine himself, "I know of three hundred outbreaks before July 14."[30]
^Terrier, Jean (2011).Visions of the Social: Society as a Political Project in France, 1750–1950. BrillL, pp. 25–26.
^Hauser, Arnold (2012). "Art as a Product of Society." In:The Sociology of Art. Routledge, pp. 96–97.
^"Taine's indebtedness to Herder has not yet fully been recognized. Every element of Taine's theory is contained in Herder's writings." – Koller, Armin H. (1912). "Johann Gottfried Herder and Hippolyte Taine: Their Theories of Milieu,"PMLA, Vol. 27, p. xxxix.
^Jones, R.A. (1933)."Taine and the Nationalists." In:The Social and Political Ideas of Some Representative Thinkers of the Victorian Age. New York: Barnes & Noble, Inc., pp. 222–249.
^Wolff, Mark (2001). "Individuality and l'Esprit Français: On Gustave Lanson's Pedagogy",MLQ: Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 239–257.
Kamuf, Peggy (1997). "The Analogy of Science: Taine." In:The Division of Literature: Or the University in Deconstruction. University of Chicago Press, pp. 85–92.
Brown, Marshall (1997). "Why Style Matters: The Lessons of Taine's 'History of English Literature'." In:Turning Points. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 33–87.
Gates, Lewis E. (1900)."Taine's Influence as a Critic." In:Studies and Appreciations. New York: The Macmillan Company, pp. 192–204.
Morawski, Stefan (1963). "The Problem of Value and Criteria in Taine's Aesthetics,"The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 407–421.
Nias, Hilary (1999).The Artificial Self: The Psychology of Hippolyte Taine. Oxford: Legenda.
Nitze, William & Dargan, E. Preston (1922)."The Philosophers: Comte, Taine, Renan." In:A History of French Literature. New York: Henry Holt & Company, pp. 645–656.
Rawlinson, G.C. (1917)."Hippolyte Taine." In:Recent French Tendencies. London: Robert Scott, pp. 19–24.
Roe, F.C. (1949). "A Note on Taine's Conception of the English Mind." In:Studies in French Language, Literature and History. Cambridge University Press, pp. 189–192.
Sullivan, Jeremiah J. (1973). "Henry James and Hippolyte Taine: The Historical and Scientific Method in Literature,"Comparative Literature Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 25–50.