High conservation value forest (HCVF) is aForest Stewardship Council (FSC)forest management designation used to describe those forests who meet criteria defined by the FSC Principles and Criteria of Forest Stewardship.
Specifically, high conservation value forests are those that possess one or more of the following attributes:
The denomination HCVF arose relatively recently in connection with the development of standards for the certification of forest management. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), an international accreditation association incorporated in 1995, first started considering the termhigh conservation values in 1996.[2] FSC formally included the termhigh conservation value forests in the FSC Principles and Criteria of Forest Stewardship in January 1999.[1]
A number of terms have been used somewhat interchangeably with the term HCVF. To a certain extent this arises from translation between languages and to a certain extent it arises from varying approaches at interpretation. The Spanish version uses the termsbosques con alto valor de conservación (forests with high value of conservation) andbosques con alto valor para la conservación (forests with high value for conservation).
As noted, the term HCVF arose following consideration of the termhigh conservation values; this usage led to the concept offorests having high conservation values andforests with high conservation values. Indeed, the termhigh conservation value is sometimes given its own acronymHCV; however, the FSC refers to an HCV as "attributes".
Examples of the large landscape globally important forests include theCanada boreal forest and the remaining Amazonrainforest.
Examples of forest types which embrace rare orendangered species include theDry deciduous forests ofMadagascar the twoMonterey Cypress of central coastal California[3] and theMaritime Coast Range Ponderosa Pine forests of coastal California.
Following the inclusion of the term in the FSC P&C in 1999, the FSC formed an Advisory Panel for the Implementation of high conservation value forests and theprecautionary principle. This panel produced a number of consultation documents on how to identify HCVF, including indicators and verifiers. However, this consultation process was not finalized and FSC has yet to issue any specific guidance regarding HCVF1.[2]
In lieu of formal guidance from FSC, there has been a proliferation of discussion on HCVF, led mainly bynon-governmental organisations (NGOs). In particular, the need for more precise and practical guidance led to a 2001 initiative by the UK-based consulting company, Proforest Ltd. This initiative led to the production of a three-partHigh Conservation Value Toolkit (the ‘Global Toolkit’).[4] The Global Toolkit offered a revised definition of HCVF as follows:
A High Conservation Value Forest is the area of forest required to maintain or enhance a High Conservation Value.[4]
This definition provides a new approach to the zonation of HCVF as well as introduces the concept of ‘High Conservation Value’. The inclusion of the term ‘area of forest’ provide clarity that there may be instances where an HCVF zone might be restricted to part of a forest, while the FSC definition implied that the presence of one or more HCV attribute would render the whole forest as to be a ‘high conservation value forest’. Indeed, despite the provision for partial zonation, the Global Toolkit makes it clear that for the purposes of certification, any forest management unit containing even one small HCV is classified as a High Conservation Value Forest, which brings into play extra requirements for consultation, maintenance or enhancement, and annual monitoring. However, the additional burden is determined by the nature of the HCV and will affect only those parts of the forest, and those aspects of management, that are required for the maintenance or enhancement of the HCV (this procedure is explained in more detail in the section on Adaptive Management, below).
There are six recognized forms of High conservation values forests:
The Global Toolkit has not been explicitly endorsed by the FSC but the revised ordering system appears to have gained widespread appeal and there is a recommendation for its use in FSC reports found in a footnote to an FSC reporting standard.[1] The Global Toolkit was intentionally designed for a wide range of users beyond the FSC scheme. Indeed, in December 2005, the popularity of the HCV approach led to the formation of the HCV Resource Network which includes a broad platform of NGOs as well as theWorld Bank and theInternational Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO).[5]
The concept of aHigh conservation value forest has now been generalized and used by other certification schemes like theRoundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), theBetter Cotton Initiative, the Sustainable Agriculture Network (SAN) andBonsucro, among others. Consumer goods companies (mainly members of theConsumer Goods Forum) have also made independent commitments to protecting High Conservation Values in their supply chains.
The analogous six High Conservation Values are: