Hagia Sophia,[a] officially theHagia Sophia Grand Mosque,[b] is a mosque serving as a major cultural and historical site inIstanbul,Turkey. It was formerly achurch (360–1453) and amuseum (1935–2020). The last of three church buildings to be successively erected on the site by theEastern Roman Empire, it was completed in AD 537, becoming the world's largest interior space and amongthe first to employ a fullypendentive dome. It is considered the epitome ofByzantine architecture[2] and is said to have "changed the history of architecture".[3] From its dedication in 360 until 1453 Hagia Sophia served as thecathedral ofConstantinople in theByzantine liturgical tradition, except for the period 1204–1261 when theLatin Crusaders installed their ownhierarchy.[4] After thefall of Constantinople in 1453, it served as a mosque, having itsminarets added soon after. The site became a museum in 1935, and was redesignated as a mosque in 2020.[5]
The current structure was built by theByzantine emperorJustinian I as the Christian cathedral of Constantinople between 532–537 and was designed by the GreekgeometersIsidore of Miletus andAnthemius of Tralles.[6] It was formally called theTemple of God's Holy Wisdom, (Greek:Ναὸς τῆς Ἁγίας τοῦ Θεοῦ Σοφίας,romanized: Naòs tês Hagías toû Theoû Sophías)[7][8] the third church of the same name to occupy the site, as the prior one had been destroyed in theNika riots. As theepiscopal see of theecumenical patriarch of Constantinople, it remained the world's largest cathedral for nearly a thousand years, until theSeville Cathedral was completed in 1520.
After the fall of Constantinople to theOttoman Empire in 1453,[15] it wasconverted to a mosque byMehmed the Conqueror and became theprincipal mosque of Istanbul until the 1616 construction of theSultan Ahmed Mosque.[16][17] The patriarchate moved to theChurch of the Holy Apostles, which became the city's cathedral. The complex remained a mosque until 1931, when it was closed to the public for four years. It was re-opened in 1935 as a museum under thesecular Republic of Turkey, and the building was Turkey's most visited tourist attraction as of 2019[update].[18] In 2020, theCouncil of State annulled the 1934 decision to establish the museum, and the Hagia Sophia was reclassified as a mosque. The decision was highly controversial, sparking divided opinions and drawing condemnation from the Turkish opposition,UNESCO, theWorld Council of Churches and theInternational Association of Byzantine Studies, as well as numerous international leaders, while several Muslim leaders in Turkey and other countries welcomed its conversion.
A map of the administrative heart of Constantinople. The Hagia Sophia and the structures of theGreat Palace are shown in their approximate position as derived from literary sources. Surviving structures are in black.
The first church on the site was known as theMagna Ecclesia (Μεγάλη Ἐκκλησία,Megálē Ekklēsíā, 'Great Church')[19][20] because of its size compared to the sizes of the contemporary churches in the city.[10] According to theChronicon Paschale, the church wasconsecrated on 15 February 360, during the reign of the emperorConstantius II (r. 337–361) by theArian bishopEudoxius of Antioch.[21][22] It was built next to the area where theGreat Palace was being developed.[23]
Hesychius of Miletus wrote that Constantine built Hagia Sophia with a wooden roof and removed 427 (mostly pagan) statues from the site.[24] The 12th-century chroniclerJoannes Zonaras reconciles the two opinions, writing that Constantius had repaired the edifice consecrated byEusebius of Nicomedia, after it had collapsed.[21] Since Eusebius was thebishop of Constantinople from 339 to 341, and Constantine died in 337, it seems that the first church was erected by Constantius.[21]
The nearbyHagia Irene ("Holy Peace") church was completed earlier and served as cathedral until the Great Church was completed. Besides Hagia Irene, there is no record of major churches in the city-centre before the late 4th century.[22] Rowland Mainstone argued the 4th-century church was not yet known as Hagia Sophia.[25]
According toKen Dark and Jan Kostenec, a further remnant of the 4th century basilica may exist in a wall of alternating brick and stone banded masonry immediately to the west of the Justinianic church.[28] The top part of the wall is constructed with bricks stamped with brick-stamps dating from the 5th century, but the lower part is of constructed with bricks typical of the 4th century.[28] This wall was probably part of thepropylaeum at the west front of both the Constantinian and Theodosian Great Churches.[28]
The building was accompanied by abaptistery and askeuophylakion.[22] Ahypogeum, perhaps with anmartyrium above it, was discovered before 1946, and the remnants of a brick wall with traces of marble revetment were identified in 2004.[28] The hypogeum was a tomb which may have been part of the 4th-century church or may have been from the pre-Constantinian city ofByzantium.[28] Theskeuophylakion is said byPalladius to have had a circular floor plan, and since some U-shaped basilicas in Rome were funerary churches with attached circular mausolea (theMausoleum of Constantina and theMausoleum of Helena), it is possible it originally had a funerary function, though by 405 its use had changed.[28] A later account credited a woman called Anna with donating the land on which the church was built in return for the right to be buried there.[28]
Excavations on the western side of the site of the first church under the propylaeum wall reveal that the first church was built atop a road about 8 m (26 ft) wide.[28] According to early accounts, the first Hagia Sophia was built on the site of an ancient pagan temple,[29][30][31] although there are no artefacts to confirm this.[32]
The Patriarch of ConstantinopleJohn Chrysostom came into a conflict with EmpressAelia Eudoxia, wife of the emperorArcadius (r. 383–408), and was sent into exile on 20 June 404. During the subsequent riots, this first church was largely burnt down.[21] Palladius noted that the 4th-centuryskeuophylakion survived the fire.[33] According to Dark and Kostenec, the fire may only have affected the main basilica, leaving the ancillary buildings intact.[33]
A Theodosian capital for acolumn, one of the few remains of the church ofTheodosius II
A second church on the site was ordered byTheodosius II (r. 402–450), who inaugurated it on 10 October 415.[34] TheNotitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae, a fifth-century list of monuments, names Hagia Sophia asMagna Ecclesia, 'Great Church', while the former cathedral Hagia Irene is referred to asEcclesia Antiqua, 'Old Church'. At the time of Socrates of Constantinople around 440, "both churches [were] enclosed by a single wall and served by the same clergy".[23] Thus, the complex would have encompassed a large area including the future site of theHospital of Samson.[33] If the fire of 404 destroyed only the 4th-century main basilica church, then the 5th century Theodosian basilica could have been built surrounded by a complex constructed primarily during the fourth century.[33]
During the reign of Theodosius II, the emperor's elder sister, theAugustaPulcheria (r. 414–453) was challenged by the patriarchNestorius (r. 10 April 428 – 22 June 431).[35][36] The patriarch denied theAugusta access to the sanctuary of the "Great Church", likely on 15 April 428.[36] According to the anonymousLetter to Cosmas, the virgin empress, a promoter of thecult of the Virgin Mary who habitually partook in theEucharist at the sanctuary of Nestorius's predecessors, claimed right of entry because of her equivalent position to theTheotokos – the Virgin Mary – "having given birth to God".[37][36] Pulcheria along withPope Celestine I and PatriarchCyril of Alexandria had Nestorius overthrown, condemned at the ecumenical council, and exiled.[37][35]
The area of the western entrance to the Justinianic Hagia Sophia revealed the western remains of its Theodosian predecessor, as well as some fragments of the Constantinian church.[33] German archaeologistAlfons Maria Schneider began conductingarchaeological excavations during the mid-1930s, publishing his final report in 1941.[33] Excavations in the area that had once been the 6th-century atrium of the Justinianic church revealed the monumental western entrance and atrium, along with columns and sculptural fragments from both 4th- and 5th-century churches.[33] Further digging was abandoned for fear of harming the structural integrity of the Justinianic building, but parts of the excavation trenches remain uncovered, laying bare the foundations of the Theodosian building.
The basilica was built by architect Rufinus.[38][39] The church's main entrance, which may have had gilded doors, faced west, and there was an additional entrance to the east.[40] There was a centralpulpit and likely an upper gallery, possibly employed as amatroneum (women's section).[40] The exterior was decorated with elaborate carvings of rich Theodosian-era designs, fragments of which have survived, while the floor just inside the portico was embellished with polychrome mosaics.[33] The surviving carved gable end from the centre of the western façade is decorated with a cross-roundel.[33] Fragments of afrieze ofreliefs with 12 lambs representing the12 apostles also remain; unlike Justinian's 6th-century church, the Theodosian Hagia Sophia had both colourful floor mosaics and external decorative sculpture.[33]
At the western end, surviving stone fragments of the structure show there wasvaulting, at least at the western end.[33] The Theodosian building had a monumental propylaeum hall with a portico that may account for this vaulting, which was thought by the original excavators in the 1930s to be part of the western entrance of the church itself.[33] The propylaeum opened onto an atrium which lay in front of the basilica church itself. Preceding the propylaeum was a steep monumental staircase following the contours of the ground as it sloped away westwards in the direction of theStrategion, the Basilica, and the harbours of theGolden Horn.[33] This arrangement would have resembled the steps outside the atrium of the ConstantinianOld St Peter's Basilica in Rome.[33] Near the staircase, there was a cistern, perhaps to supply a fountain in the atrium or for worshippers to wash with before entering.[33]
The 4th-centuryskeuophylakion was replaced in the 5th century by the present-day structure, arotunda constructed of banded masonry in the lower two levels and of plain brick masonry in the third.[33] Originally this rotunda, probably employed as a treasury for liturgical objects, had a second-floor internal gallery accessed by an external spiral staircase and two levels of niches for storage.[33] A further row of windows with marble window frames on the third level remain bricked up.[33] The gallery was supported on monumentalconsoles with carvedacanthus designs, similar to those used on the late 5th-centuryColumn of Leo.[33] A largelintel of theskeuophylakion's western entrance – bricked up during the Ottoman era – was discovered inside the rotunda when it was archaeologically cleared to its foundations in 1979, during which time the brickwork was alsorepointed.[33] Theskeuophylakion was again restored in 2014 by theVakıflar.[33]
A fire started during the tumult of theNika Revolt, which had begun nearby in theHippodrome of Constantinople, and the second Hagia Sophia was burnt to the ground on 13–14 January 532. The court historianProcopius wrote:[41]
And by way of shewing that it was not against the Emperor alone that they [the rioters] had taken up arms, but no less against God himself, unholy wretches that they were, they had the hardihood to fire the Church of the Christians, which the people of Byzantium call "Sophia", an epithet which they have most appropriately invented for God, by which they call His temple; and God permitted them to accomplish this impiety, foreseeing into what an object of beauty this shrine was destined to be transformed. So the whole church at that time lay a charred mass of ruins.
The 6th-century Hagia Sophia (532–537) byByzantine emperorJustinian the Great was the largest cathedral in the world for nearly a thousand years, until the 1507 completion of theSeville Cathedral inSpain.The construction of church depicted in the 14th century codex, theConstantine Manasses
On 23 February 532, only a few weeks after the destruction of the second basilica, EmperorJustinian I inaugurated the construction of a third and entirely different basilica, larger and more majestic than its predecessors.[42] Justinian appointed two architects, mathematicianAnthemius of Tralles and geometer and engineerIsidore of Miletus, to design the building.[43][44]
Construction of the church began in 532 during the short tenure of Phocas aspraetorian prefect.[45] According toJohn the Lydian, Phocas was responsible for funding the initial construction of the building with 4,000Roman pounds of gold, but he was dismissed from office in October 532.[46][45] John the Lydian wrote that Phocas had acquired the funds by moral means, butEvagrius Scholasticus later wrote that the money had been obtained unjustly.[47][45]
According toAnthony Kaldellis, both of Hagia Sophia's architects named by Procopius were associated with theschool of the pagan philosopherAmmonius of Alexandria.[45] It is possible that both they and John the Lydian considered Hagia Sophia a great temple for the supremeNeoplatonistdeity who manifestated through light and the sun. John the Lydian describes the church as the "temenos of the Great God" (Greek:τὸ τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ Τέμενος,romanized: tò toû megálou theoû Témenos).[46][45]
Originally the exterior of the church was covered withmarble veneer, as indicated by remaining pieces of marble and surviving attachments for lost panels on the building's western face.[48] The white marblecladding of much of the church, together withgilding of some parts, would have given Hagia Sophia a shimmering appearance quite different from the brick- and plaster-work of the modern period, and would have significantly increased its visibility from the sea.[48] The cathedral's interior surfaces were sheathed with polychrome marbles, green and white with purpleporphyry, and gold mosaics. The exterior was clad instucco that was tinted yellow and red during the 19th-century restorations by theFossati architects.[49]
The construction is described by Procopius inOn Buildings (Greek:Περὶ κτισμάτων,romanized: Peri ktismatōn, Latin:De aedificiis).[41] Columns and other marble elements were imported from throughout the Mediterranean, although the columns were once thought to bespoils from cities such as Rome and Ephesus.[50] Even though they were made specifically for Hagia Sophia, they vary in size.[51]
More than ten thousand people were employed during the construction process. This new church was contemporaneously recognized as a major work of architecture. Outside the church was an elaborate array of monuments around the bronze-platedColumn of Justinian, topped by an equestrian statue of the emperor which dominated theAugustaeum, the open square outside the church which connected it with theGreat Palace complex through theChalke Gate.
At the edge of the Augustaeum was theMilion and the Regia, the first stretch of Constantinople's main thoroughfare, theMese. Also facing the Augustaeum were the enormous Constantinianthermae, theBaths of Zeuxippus, and the Justinianic civic basilica under which was the vastcistern known as theBasilica Cistern. On the opposite side of Hagia Sophia was the former cathedral, Hagia Irene.
Procopius lauded the Justinianic building, writing inDe aedificiis:[41]
... the Emperor Justinian built not long afterwards a church so finely shaped, that if anyone had enquired of the Christians before the burning if it would be their wish that the church should be destroyed and one like this should take its place, shewing them some sort of model of the building we now see, it seems to me that they would have prayed that they might see their church destroyed forthwith, in order that the building might be converted into its present form.
— Procopius,De aedificiis, I.1.22–23
Upon seeing the finished building, the Emperor reportedly said: "Solomon, I have surpassed thee".[52]
Justinian andPatriarch Menas inaugurated the new basilica on 27 December 537, 5 years and 10 months after construction started, with much pomp.[53][54][55] Hagia Sophia was the seat of the Patriarchate of Constantinople and a principal setting for Byzantine imperial ceremonies, such ascoronations. The basilica offeredsanctuary from persecution to criminals, although there was disagreement about whether Justinian had intended for murderers to be eligible for asylum.[56]
Basket capitals and verd antique and marble columns. The basket capitals of the building are carved withmonograms of the names Justinian (Greek:᾽Ιουστινιανός,romanized: Ioustinianós) and Thedora (Θεοδώρα,Theodṓra) and their imperial titles "βασιλεύς,basileús" and "αὐγούστα,augoústa".[57]
Earthquakes in 553 and on557 caused cracks in the main dome and easternsemi-dome. According to theChronicle ofJohn Malalas, during a subsequent earthquake in 558,[58] the eastern semi-dome collapsed, destroying theambon, altar, andciborium. The collapse was due mainly to the excessivebearing load and to the enormousshear load of the dome, which was too flat.[53] These caused the deformation of the piers which sustained the dome.[53] Justinian ordered an immediate restoration. He entrusted it to Isidorus the Younger, who used lighter materials. The entire vault had to be taken down and rebuilt 20 Byzantine feet (6.25 m or 20.5 ft) higher than before, giving the building its current interior height of 55.6 m (182 ft).[59] Moreover, Isidorus changed the dome type, erecting a ribbed dome withpendentives whose diameter was between 32.7 and 33.5 m.[53] Under Justinian's orders, eightCorinthian columns were disassembled fromBaalbek, Lebanon and shipped to Constantinople around 560.[60] This reconstruction, which gave the church its present 6th-century form, was completed in 562. The poetPaul the Silentiary composed anekphrasis, or long visual poem, for the re-dedication of the basilica presided over byPatriarch Eutychius on 24 December 562.[61][62]
According to the history of the patriarchNicephorus I and the chroniclerTheophanes the Confessor, various liturgical vessels of the cathedral were melted down on the order of the emperorHeraclius (r. 610–641) during theByzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628.[63] Theophanes states that these were made into gold and silver coins, and a tribute was paid to theAvars.[63] The Avars attacked the extramural areas of Constantinople in 623, causing the Byzantines to move the "garment" relic (Ancient Greek:ἐσθής,romanized: esthḗs) of Mary, mother of Jesus to Hagia Sophia from its usual shrine of theChurch of theTheotokos atBlachernae just outside theTheodosian walls.[64] On 14 May 626, theScholae Palatinae, an elite body of soldiers, protested in Hagia Sophia against a planned increase in bread prices.[65] The Persians underShahrbaraz and the Avars together laid thesiege of Constantinople in 626; according to theChronicon Paschale, on 2 August 626,Theodore Syncellus, adeacon andpresbyter of Hagia Sophia, was among those who negotiated unsuccessfully with thekhagan of the Avars.[66] Ahomily, attributed by existingmanuscripts to Theodore Syncellus and possibly delivered on the anniversary of the event, describes the translation of the Virgin's garment and its ceremonial re-translation to Blachernae by the patriarchSergius I after the threat had passed.[66][67]
Polychrome marble revetment on the wall of the gallery
In 726, the emperorLeo the Isaurian issued a series of edicts against the veneration of images, ordering the army to destroy all icons – ushering in the period ofByzantine iconoclasm. At that time, all religious pictures and statues were removed from the Hagia Sophia. Following a brief hiatus during the reign of EmpressIrene (797–802), the iconoclasts returned. EmperorTheophilus (r. 829–842) had two-winged bronze doors with hismonograms installed at the southern entrance of the church.[68]
The basilica suffered damage, first in a great fire in 859, and again in an earthquake in 869 that caused the collapse of one of the half-domes.[69] EmperorBasil I ordered repair of the tympanas, arches, and vaults.[70]
In his bookDe Ceremoniis ("Book of Ceremonies"), the emperorConstantine VII (r. 913–959) wrote a detailed account of the ceremonies held in the Hagia Sophia by the emperor and the patriarch.
Early in the 10th century, the pagan ruler of theKievan Rus' sent emissaries to his neighbors to learn about Judaism, Islam, and Roman and Orthodox Christianity. After visiting Hagia Sophia his emissaries reported back: "We were led into a place where they serve their God, and we did not know where we were, in heaven or on earth."[71]
After an earthquake in 989 collapsed the western dome arch, EmperorBasil II asked for the Armenian architectTrdat, creator of theCathedral of Ani, to direct the repairs.[76] He erected again and reinforced the fallen dome arch, and rebuilt the west side of the dome with 15 dome ribs.[77] The extent of the damage required six years of repair and reconstruction; the church was re-opened on 13 May 994. At the end of the reconstruction, the church's decorations were renovated, including the addition of four immense paintings of cherubs; a new depiction of Christ on the dome; a burial cloth of Christ shown on Fridays, and on theapse a new depiction of the Virgin Mary holding Jesus, between the apostles Peter and Paul.[78] On the great side arches were painted the prophets and the teachers of the church.[78]
Detail of the verd column
In 1181, the daughter of the emperor Manuel I,Maria Comnena, and her husband, thecaesarRenier of Montferrat, fled to Hagia Sophia at the culmination of their dispute with the empressMaria of Antioch, regent for her son, the emperorAlexius II Comnenus.[79] Maria Comnena and Renier occupied the cathedral with the support of the patriarch, refusing the imperial administration's demands for a peaceful departure.[79] According to Niketas Choniates, they "transformed the sacred courtyard into a military camp", garrisoned the entrances to the complex with locals and mercenaries, and despite the strong opposition of the patriarch, made the "house of prayer into a den of thieves or a well-fortified and precipitous stronghold", while "all the dwellings adjacent to Hagia Sophia and adjoining the Augusteion were demolished by [Maria's] men".[79] A battle ensued in the Augustaion and around theMilion, during which the defenders fought from the "gallery of the Catechumeneia (also called the Makron)" facing the Augusteion, from which they eventually retreated and took up positions in the exonarthex of Hagia Sophia itself.[79] At this point, "the patriarch was anxious lest the enemy troops enter the temple, with unholy feet trample the holy floor, and with hands defiled and dripping with blood still warm plunder the all-holy dedicatory offerings".[79] After a successful sally by Renier and his knights, Maria requested a truce, the imperial assault ceased, and an amnesty was negotiated.[79] Greek historianNiketas Choniates compared the preservation of the cathedral to the efforts made by the 1st-century emperorTitus to avoid the destruction of theSecond Temple during thesiege of Jerusalem in theFirst Jewish–Roman War.[79] Choniates reports that in 1182, a whitehawk wearingjesses was seen to fly from the east to Hagia Sophia, flying three times from the "building of theThōmaitēs" (a basilica erected on the southeastern side of the Augustaion) to thePalace of the Kathisma in theGreat Palace, where new emperors wereacclaimed.[80] This was supposed to presage the end of the reign ofAndronicus I Comnenus (r. 1183–1185).[80]
Thehexapterygon (six-winged angel) on the north-east pendentive (lower left), whose face was discovered and then covered back by the Fossati brothers after restoration works in the 19th century. It was uncovered again in 2009.
Choniates writes that in 1203, during theFourth Crusade, the emperorsIsaac II Angelus andAlexius IV Angelus stripped Hagia Sophia of all gold ornaments and silver oil-lamps to pay off the Crusaders who had oustedAlexius III Angelus and helped Isaac return to the throne.[81] In theSack of Constantinople in 1204, the church was further ransacked and desecrated by the Crusaders, as described by Choniates, though he did not witness the events in person. According to his account, Hagia Sophia was stripped of its remaining metal ornaments, its altar was smashed into pieces, and a "woman laden with sins" sang and danced on thesynthronon.[82][83][84] He adds that mules and donkeys were brought into the cathedral's sanctuary to carry away the spoils, and that one of them slipped on the marble floor and was accidentally disembowelled, further contaminating the place.[82] According toAli ibn al-Athir, whose treatment of the Sack of Constantinople was probably dependent on a Christian source, the Crusaders massacred some clerics who had surrendered.[85] Much of the interior was damaged and would not be repaired until its return to Orthodox control in 1261.[32] The sack of Hagia Sophia, and Constantinople in general, remained a sore point inCatholic–Eastern Orthodox relations.[86]
During theLatin occupation of Constantinople (1204–1261), the church became a Latin Catholic cathedral.Baldwin I of Constantinople (r. 1204–1205) was crowned emperor on 16 May 1204 in Hagia Sophia in a ceremony which closely followed Byzantine practices.Enrico Dandolo, theDoge ofVenice who commanded the sack and invasion of the city in 1204, is buried inside the church, probably in the upper easterngallery. In the 19th century, an Italian restoration team placed acenotaph marker, frequently mistaken as being a medieval artifact, near the probable location and is still visible. The original tomb was destroyed by the Ottomans during the conversion of the church into a mosque.[87]
On 12 December 1452,Isidore of Kiev proclaimed in Hagia Sophia the long-anticipated ecclesiastical union between the western Catholic and eastern Orthodox Churches as decided at theCouncil of Florence and decreed by thepapal bullLaetentur Caeli, though it would be short-lived. The union was unpopular among the Byzantines, who had already expelled the Patriarch of Constantinople,Gregory III, for his pro-union stance. A new patriarch was not installed until after the Ottoman conquest. According to the Greek historianDoukas, the Hagia Sophia was tainted by these Catholic associations, and the anti-union Orthodox faithful avoided the cathedral, considering it to be a haunt ofdemons and a "Hellenic" temple ofRoman paganism.[90] Doukas also notes that after theLaetentur Caeli was proclaimed, the Byzantines dispersed discontentedly to nearby venues where they drank toasts to theHodegetria icon, which had, according to late Byzantine tradition, interceded to save them in the formersieges of Constantinople by theAvar Khaganate and theUmayyad Caliphate.[91]
According toNestor Iskander's Tale on the Taking of Tsargrad, the Hagia Sophia was the focus of an alarmingomen interpreted as theHoly Spirit abandoning Constantinople on 21 May 1453, in the final days of the Siege of Constantinople.[92] The sky lit up, illuminating the city, and
many people gathered and saw on the Church of the Wisdom, at the top of the window, a large flame of fire issuing forth. It encircled the entire neck of the church for a long time. The flame gathered into one; its flame altered, and there was an indescribable light. At once it took to the sky. ... The light itself has gone up to heaven; the gates of heaven were opened; the light was received; and again they were closed.[92]
The eventual fall of Constantinople had long been predicted inapocalyptic literature.[93] Hagia Sophia is mentioned in a hagiography of uncertain date detailing the life of the Eastern Orthodox saintAndrew the Fool.[94] The text is self-attributed to Nicephorus, a priest of Hagia Sophia, and contains a description of theend time in the form of a dialogue, in which the interlocutor, upon being told by the saint that Constantinople will be sunk in a flood and that "the waters as they gush forth will irresistibly deluge her and cover her and surrender her to the terrifying and immense sea of the abyss", says "some people say that the Great Church of God will not be submerged with the city but will be suspended in the air by an invisible power".[94] The reply is given that "When the whole city sinks into the sea, how can the Great Church remain? Who will need her? Do you think God dwells in temples made with hands?"[94] TheColumn of Constantine, however, is prophesied to endure.[94]
According toLaonicus Chalcocondyles, Hagia Sophia was a refuge for the population during the city's capture.[95] Despite the ill-repute and empty state of Hagia Sophia after December 1452, Doukas writes that after the Theodosian walls were breached, the Byzantines took refuge there as the Turks advanced through the city.[95] He attributes their change of heart to a prophecy.[95]
What was the reason that compelled all to flee to the Great Church? They had been listening, for many years, to some pseudo-soothsayers, who had declared that the city was destined to be handed over to the Turks, who would enter in large numbers and would massacre the Romans as far as the Column of Constantine the Great. After this an angel would descend, holding his sword. He would hand over the kingdom, together with the sword, to some insignificant, poor, and humble man who would happen to be standing by the Column. He would say to him: "Take this sword and avenge the Lord's people." Then the Turks would be turned back, would be massacred by the pursuing Romans, and would be ejected from the city and from all places in the west and the east and would be driven as far as the borders of Persia, to a place called the Lone Tree ... That was the cause for the flight into the Great Church. In one hour that famous and enormous church was filled with men and women. An innumerable crowd was everywhere: upstairs, downstairs, in the courtyards, and in every conceivable place. They closed the gates and stood there, hoping for salvation.
— Doukas, XXXIX.18
In accordance with the traditional custom of the time, SultanMehmed II allowed three full days of unbridled pillage in the city shortly after it was captured. This period saw the destruction of many Orthodox churches;[96] Hagia Sophia itself was looted as the invaders believed it to contain the greatest treasures of the city.[97] Shortly after the defence of theWalls of Constantinople collapsed and the victorious Ottoman troops entered the city, the pillagers and looters made their way to the Hagia Sophia and battered down its doors before storming inside.[98] Once the three days passed, Mehmed was to claim the city's remaining contents for himself.[99][100] However, by the end of the first day, he proclaimed that the looting should cease as he felt profound sadness when he toured the city.[101][99][102]
Throughout the siege of Constantinople, the trapped people of the city participated in theDivine Liturgy and the Prayer of the Hours at the Hagia Sophia, and the church was a refuge for many of those who were unable to contribute to the city's defence, including women, children, elderly, the sick and the wounded.[103][104][102] As they were trapped in the church, the many congregants and other refugees became spoils-of-war to be divided amongst the triumphant invaders. The building was desecrated and looted, and those who sought shelter within the church were enslaved.[97] While most of the elderly and the infirm, injured, and sick were killed, the remainder (mainly teenage males and young boys) were chained and sold intoslavery in the Ottoman Empire.[98][102]
Themihrab located in the apse where the altar used to stand, pointing towards Mecca. The two giant candlesticks flanking the mihrab were brought in fromOttoman Hungary by SultanSuleiman the Magnificent.
Constantinople fell to the attacking Ottoman forces on 29 May 1453.Sultan Mehmed II entered the city and performed theFriday prayer andkhutbah (sermon) in Hagia Sophia.[105] The church's priests and religious personnel continued to perform Christian rites, prayers, and ceremonies until they were compelled to stop.[98] When Mehmed and his entourage entered the church, he ordered that it be converted into a mosque immediately. One of theʿulamāʾ (Islamic scholars) present climbed onto the church's ambo and recited theshahada ("There is no god but Allah, andMuhammad is his messenger"), thus marking theconversion of the church into a mosque.[88][106] Mehmed is reported to have taken a sword to a soldier who tried to pry up one of the paving slabs of the Proconnesian marble floor.[107]
As described by Western visitors before 1453, such as theCórdoban noblemanPero Tafur[108] and theFlorentine geographerCristoforo Buondelmonti,[109] the church was in a dilapidated state, with several of its doors fallen from their hinges. Mehmed II ordered a renovation of the building. Mehmed attended the first Friday prayer in the mosque on 1 June 1453.[110] Aya Sofya became the first imperial mosque of Istanbul.[111] Most of the existing houses in the city and the area of the futureTopkapı Palace were endowed to the correspondingwaqf.[88] From 1478, 2,360 shops, 1,300 houses, 4caravanserais, 30boza shops, and 23 shops of sheep heads and trotters gave their income to the foundation.[112] Through the imperial charters of 1520 and 1547, shops and parts of theGrand Bazaar and other markets were added to the foundation.[88]
Before 1481, a smallminaret was erected on the southwest corner of the building, above the stair tower.[88] Mehmed's successorBayezid II (r. 1481–1512) later built another minaret at the northeast corner.[88] One of the minarets collapsed after theearthquake of 1509,[88] and around the middle of the 16th century they were both replaced by two diagonally opposite minarets built at the east and west corners of the edifice.[88] In 1498,Bernardo Bonsignori was the last Western visitor to Hagia Sophia to report seeing the ancient Justinianic floor; shortly afterwards the floor was covered over with carpet and not seen again until the 19th century.[107]
In the 16th century, SultanSuleiman the Magnificent (r. 1520–1566) brought two colossal candlesticks from hisconquest of theKingdom of Hungary and placed them on either side of themihrab. During Suleiman's reign, the mosaics above thenarthex and imperial gates depicting Jesus, Mary, and various Byzantine emperors were covered by whitewash and plaster, which were removed in 1930 under the Turkish Republic.[113][better source needed]
Fountain (Şadırvan) for ritual ablutions
During the reign ofSelim II (r. 1566–1574), the building started showing signs of fatigue and was extensively strengthened with the addition of structural supports to its exterior by Ottoman architectMimar Sinan, who was also an earthquake engineer.[114] In addition to strengthening the historic Byzantine structure, Sinan built two additional large minarets at the western end of the building, the original sultan's lodge and thetürbe (mausoleum) of Selim II to the southeast of the building in 1576–1577. In order to do that, parts of the Patriarchate at the south corner of the building were pulled down the previous year.[88] Moreover, the goldencrescent was mounted on the top of the dome,[88] and a respect zone 35arşın (about 24 m) wide was imposed around the building, leading to the demolition of all houses within the perimeter.[88] The türbe became the location of the tombs of 43 Ottoman princes.[88]Murad III (r. 1574–1595) imported two largealabaster Hellenisticurns fromPergamon (Bergama) and placed them on two sides of the nave.[88]
In 1717, under the reign of SultanAhmed III (r. 1703–1730), the crumbling plaster of the interior was renovated, contributing indirectly to the preservation of many mosaics, which otherwise would have been destroyed by mosque workers.[115] It was usual for the mosaic'stesserae—believed to betalismans—to be sold to visitors.[115] SultanMahmud I ordered the restoration of the building in 1739 and added amedrese (a Koranic school, subsequently the library of the museum), animaret (soup kitchen for distribution to the poor) and a library, and in 1740 he added aŞadirvan (fountain for ritual ablutions), thus transforming it into akülliye, or social complex. A new sultan's lodge and a new mihrab were built inside.[116]
Calligraphy with the name of the 4th Rashidun CaliphAli, one of eight medallions added in the 19th century
The 19th-century restoration of the Hagia Sophia was ordered by SultanAbdulmejid I (r. 1823–1861) and completed between 1847 and 1849 by eight hundred workers under the supervision of theSwiss-Italian architect brothersGaspare and Giuseppe Fossati. The brothers consolidated the dome with a restraining iron chain and strengthened the vaults, straightened the columns, and revised the decoration of the exterior and the interior of the building.[117] The mosaics in the upper gallery were exposed and cleaned, although many were recovered "for protection against further damage".[118]
Eight new gigantic circular-framed discs ormedallions were hung from thecornice, on each of the four piers and at either side of the apse and the west doors. These were designed by the calligrapherKazasker Mustafa Izzet Efendi and painted with the names ofAllah,Muhammad, theRashidun (the first four caliphs), and the two grandsons of Muhammad.[119] In 1850, the architects Fossati built a newmaqsura or caliphal loge inNeo-Byzantine columns and an Ottoman–Rococo style marble grille connecting to the royal pavilion behind the mosque.[117] The new maqsura was built at the extreme east end of the northern aisle, next to the north-eastern pier. The existing maqsura in the apse, near the mihrab, was demolished.[117] A new entrance was constructed for the sultan: theHünkar Mahfili.[117] The Fossati brothers also renovated theminbar andmihrab.
Outside the main building, the minarets were repaired and altered so that they were of equal height.[118] A clock building, theMuvakkithane, was built by the Fossatis for use by themuwaqqit (the mosque timekeeper), and a newmadrasa (Islamic school) was constructed. TheKasr-ı Hümayun was also built under their direction.[117] When the restoration was finished, the mosque was re-opened with a ceremony on 13 July 1849.[120] An edition oflithographs from drawings made during the Fossatis' work on Hagia Sophia was published inLondon in 1852, entitled:Aya Sophia of Constantinople as Recently Restored by Order of H.M. The Sultan Abdulmejid.[117]
Gaspare Fossati's Hagia Sophia (lithographs by Louis Haghe)
Main (western) façade of Hagia Sophia, seen from courtyard of themadrasa ofMahmud I. Lithograph byLouis Haghe after Gaspard Fossati (1852).
In the aftermath of the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, Constantinople wasoccupied by British, French, Italian, and Greek forces. On 19 January 1919, the Greek Orthodox Christian military priestEleftherios Noufrakis performed aDivine Liturgy in the Hagia Sophia, the only such instance since the 1453 fall of Constantinople.[121] The anti-occupationSultanahmet demonstrations were held next to Hagia Sophia from March to May 1919. In Greece, the 500drachma banknotes issued in 1923 featured Hagia Sophia.[122]
Hagia Sophia in 1937MG08 on the minaret of the Ayasofya Museum in Istanbul, Turkey (1941)
In 1935, the firstTurkish President and founder of the Republic of Turkey,Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, transformed the building into a museum. During the Second World War, the minarets of the museum housedMG 08 machine guns.[123] The carpet and the layer of mortar underneath were removed and marble floor decorations such as theomphalion appeared for the first time since theFossatis' restoration,[124] when the white plaster covering many of the mosaics had been removed. Due to neglect, the condition of the structure continued to deteriorate, prompting theWorld Monuments Fund (WMF) to include the Hagia Sophiain their 1996 and1998 Watch Lists. The building's copper roof had cracked, causing water to leak down over the fragile frescoes and mosaics. Moisture entered from below as well. Risingground water increased the level of humidity within the monument, creating an unstable environment for stone and paint. The WMF secured a series of grants from 1997 to 2002 for the restoration of the dome. The first stage of work involved the structural stabilization and repair of the cracked roof, which was undertaken with the participation of theTurkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism. The second phase, the preservation of the dome's interior, afforded the opportunity to employ and train young Turkishconservators in the care of mosaics. By 2006, the WMF project was complete, though many areas of Hagia Sophia continue to require significant stability improvement, restoration, and conservation.[125]
In 2014, Hagia Sophia was the second most visited museum in Turkey, attracting almost 3.3 million visitors annually.[126]
The interior undergoing restoration in 2007
While use of the complex as a place of worship (mosque or church) was strictly prohibited,[127] in 1991 the Turkish government allowed the allocation of a pavilion in the museum complex (Ayasofya Müzesi Hünkar Kasrı) for use as a prayer room, and, since 2013, two of the museum's minarets had been used for voicing the call to prayer (theezan) regularly.[128][129]
From the early 2010s, several campaigns and government high officials, notably Turkey's deputy prime ministerBülent Arınç in November 2013, demanded the Hagia Sophia be converted back into a mosque.[130][131][132] In 2015,Pope Francis publicly acknowledged theArmenian genocide, which isofficially denied in Turkey. In response, the mufti of Ankara, Mefail Hızlı, said he believed the Pope's remarks would accelerate the conversion of Hagia Sophia into a mosque.[133]
On 1 July 2016, Muslim prayers were held again in the Hagia Sophia for the first time in 85 years.[134] That November, a TurkishNGO, theAssociation for the Protection of Historic Monuments and the Environment, filed a lawsuit for converting the museum into a mosque.[135] The court decided it should stay as a 'monument museum'.[136][better source needed] In October 2016, Turkey'sDirectorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet) appointed, for the first time in 81 years, a designatedimam, Önder Soy, to the Hagia Sophia mosque. Since then, the adhan has been regularly called out from the Hagia Sophia's minarets five times a day.[128][129][137]
On 13 May 2017, a large group of people, organized by the Anatolia Youth Association, gathered in front of Hagia Sophia and prayed the morning prayer with a call for the re-conversion of the museum into a mosque.[138] On 21 June 2017 theDiyanet organized a special programme, broadcast live by state-run televisionTRT, which included the recitation of theQuran and prayers in Hagia Sophia, to mark theLaylat al-Qadr.[139]
A small Muslim prayer room (mescit) in the Hagia Sophia complex, 2020The plate placed on the day of its reversion to mosque in 2020
Since 2018,Turkish presidentRecep Tayyip Erdoğan had talked of reverting the status of the Hagia Sophia back to a mosque, as a populist gesture.[140] On 31 March 2018 Erdoğan recited the first verse of the Quran in the Hagia Sophia, dedicating the prayer to the "souls of all who left us this work as inheritance, especially Istanbul'sconqueror," strengthening the political movement to make the Hagia Sophia a mosque once again.[141]
In March 2019, Erdoğan said that he would change the status of Hagia Sophia from a museum to a mosque,[142] adding that it had been a "very big mistake" to turn it into a museum.[143] As a UNESCO World Heritage site, this change would require approval from UNESCO'sWorld Heritage Committee.[144] In late 2019 Erdoğan's office took over the administration and upkeep of the nearbyTopkapı Palace Museum, transferring responsibility for the site from the Ministry of Culture and Tourism by presidential decree.[145][146][147]
In 2020, Turkey's government celebrated the 567th anniversary of the Conquest of Constantinople with an Islamic prayer in Hagia Sophia.[148] In May, during the anniversary events, passages from the Quran were read in the Hagia Sophia. Greece condemned this action, while Turkey in response accused Greece of making "futile and ineffective statements".[149] In June, the head of Turkey's Directorate of Religious Affairs said that "we would be very happy to open Hagia Sophia for worship" and that if it happened "we will provide our religious services as we do in all our mosques".[135] On 25 June,John Haldon, president of theInternational Association of Byzantine Studies, wrote an open letter to Erdoğan asking that he "consider the value of keeping the Aya Sofya as a museum".[150]
On 10 July 2020, the decision of the Council of Ministers from 1935 to transform the Hagia Sophia into a museum was annulled by the Council of State, decreeing that Hagia Sophia cannot be used "for any other purpose" than being a mosque and that the Hagia Sophia was property of the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Han Foundation. The council reasoned Ottoman Sultan Mehmet II, who conquered Istanbul, deemed the property to be used by the public as a mosque without any fees and was not within the jurisdiction of the Parliament or a ministry council.[151][152]
Despite secular and global criticism, Erdoğan signed a decree annulling the Hagia Sophia's museum status, reverting it to a mosque.[153][154] The call to prayer was broadcast from the minarets shortly after the announcement of the change and rebroadcast by major Turkish news networks.[154] A presidential spokesperson said it would become a working mosque, open to anyone similar to theParisian churchesSacré-Cœur andNotre-Dame. The spokesperson also said that the change would not affect the status of the Hagia Sophia as a UNESCO World Heritage site, and that "Christianicons" within it would continue to be protected.[140]
A presidential spokesperson claimed that all political parties in Turkey supported Erdoğan's decision,[155] but thePeoples' Democratic Party had previously released a statement denouncing the decision, saying "decisions on human heritage cannot be made on the basis of political games played by the government".[156] Themayor of Istanbul,Ekrem İmamoğlu, said that he supports the conversion "as long as it benefits Turkey", adding that he felt that Hagia Sophia has been a mosque since 1453.[157]
Ali Babacan attacked the policy of his former ally Erdoğan, saying the Hagia Sophia issue "has come to the agenda now only to cover up other problems".[158]Orhan Pamuk, Turkishnovelist andNobel laureate, publicly denounced the move, saying "Kemal Atatürk changed... Hagia Sophia from a mosque to a museum, honouring all previous Greek Orthodox and Latin Catholic history, making it as a sign of Turkish modern secularism".[154][159]
On 17 July, Erdoğan announced that the first prayers in the Hagia Sophia would be open to between 1,000 and 1,500 worshippers, stating that Turkey hadsovereign power over Hagia Sophia and was not obligated to bend to international opinion.[160]
While the Hagia Sophia has now been rehallowed as a mosque, certain areas remains open for visitors outside of prayer times. Most of the ground floor remains restricted to worshipers, however theupper galleries were reopened to visitors in 2024.[161] Women visitors are required to wear headscarfs to enter.[161] Entrance was initially free,[162] but starting from 15 January 2024, foreign nationals have to pay an entrance fee.[163]
On 22 July, a turquoise-coloured carpet was laid to prepare the mosque for worshippers.[158] The mosque opened for Friday prayers on 24 July, the 97th anniversary of the signature of theTreaty of Lausanne, which established the borders of the modern Turkish Republic.[158] The mosaics of the Virgin and Child in the apse were covered by white drapes.[159]Ali Erbaş, President of the Directorate of Religious Affairs, proclaimed during his sermon, "Sultan Mehmet the Conqueror dedicated this magnificent construction to believers to remain a mosque until theDay of Resurrection".[159] Erdoğan and some government ministers attended the midday prayers as many worshippers prayed outside; at one point the security cordon was breached and dozens of people broke through police lines.[159] Turkey invited foreign leaders and officials, including Pope Francis, for the prayers.[164] It is the fourth Byzantine church converted from museum to a mosque during Erdoğan's rule.[165]
Hagia Sophia in 2023
Days before the final decision on the conversion was made, Ecumenical PatriarchBartholomew I of Constantinople stated in a sermon that "the conversion of Hagia Sophia into a mosque would disappoint millions of Christians around the world".[166][167] The proposed conversion was decried by other Orthodox Christian leaders, theRussian Orthodox Church'sPatriarch Kirill of Moscow stating that "a threat to Hagia Sophia [wa]s a threat to all of Christian civilization".[168][169]
Following the Turkish government's decision, UNESCO announced it "deeply regret[ted]" the conversion "made without prior discussion", and asked Turkey to "open a dialogue without delay", stating that the lack of negotiation was "regrettable".[170][154] UNESCO further announced that the "state of conservation" of Hagia Sophia would be "examined" at the next session of the World Heritage Committee, urging Turkey "to initiate dialogue without delay, in order to prevent any detrimental effect on the universal value of this exceptional heritage".[170]Ernesto Ottone, UNESCO's Assistant Director-General for Culture said "It is important to avoid any implementing measure, without prior discussion with UNESCO, that would affect physical access to the site, the structure of the buildings, the site's moveable property, or the site's management".[170]
The World Council of Churches condemned the decision to convert the building into a mosque, saying that would "inevitably create uncertainties, suspicions and mistrust".[171][172][173] At the recitation of the SundayAngelus prayer atSt Peter's Square on 12 July Pope Francis said, "My thoughts go to Istanbul. I think of Santa Sophia and I am very pained" (Italian:Penso a Santa Sofia, a Istanbul, e sono molto addolorato).[c][175][176]
Josep Borrell, theEuropean Union'sHigh Representative for Foreign Affairs andVice-President of the European Commission, released a statement calling the decisions by the Council of State and Erdoğan "regrettable" and pointing out that "as a founding member of theAlliance of Civilisations, Turkey has committed to the promotion of inter-religious and inter-cultural dialogue and to fostering of tolerance and co-existence."[177] According to Borrell, theEuropean Union member states' twenty-seven foreign ministers "condemned the Turkish decision to convert such an emblematic monument as the Hagia Sophia" at meeting on 13 July, saying it "will inevitably fuel the mistrust, promote renewed division between religious communities and undermine our efforts at dialog and cooperation" and that "there was a broad support to call on the Turkish authorities to urgently reconsider and reverse this decision".[178][179]
Greece denounced the conversion and considered it a breach of the UNESCO World Heritage titling.[140] Greek culture minister Lina Mendoni called it an "open provocation to the civilised world" which "absolutely confirms that there is no independent justice" in Erdoğan's Turkey, and that hisTurkish nationalism "takes his country back six centuries".[180] Greece andCyprus called for EU sanctions on Turkey.[181]Morgan Ortagus, thespokesperson for the United States Department of State, noted: "We are disappointed by the decision by the government of Turkey to change the status of the Hagia Sophia."[180]Jean-Yves Le Drian,foreign minister ofFrance, said his country "deplores" the move, saying "these decisions cast doubt on one of the most symbolic acts of modern and secular Turkey".[173]
Ersin Tatar, prime minister of the Turkish Republic ofNorthern Cyprus, which isrecognized only by Turkey, welcomed the decision, calling it "sound" and "pleasing".[184][180] Through a spokesman theForeign Ministry ofIran welcomed the change, saying the decision was an "issue that should be considered as part of Turkey's national sovereignty" and "Turkey's internal affair".[185]Sergei Vershinin, deputy foreign minister of Russia, said that the matter was of one of "internal affairs, in which, of course, neither we nor others should interfere."[186][187] TheArab Maghreb Union was supportive.[188]
When Erdoğan announced that the first Muslim prayers would be held inside the building on 24 July, he added that "like all our mosques, the doors of Hagia Sophia will be wide open to locals and foreigners, Muslims and non-Muslims." Presidential spokesmanİbrahim Kalın said that the icons and mosaics of the building would be preserved, and that "in regards to the arguments of secularism, religious tolerance and coexistence, there are more than four hundred churches and synagogues open in Turkey today."[194] The Turkish foreign minister,Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, toldTRT Haber on 13 July that the government was surprised at the reaction of UNESCO, saying that "We have to protect our ancestors' heritage. The function can be this way or that way – it does not matter".[195]
On 14 July the prime minister of Greece,Kyriakos Mitsotakis, said his government was "considering its response at all levels" to what he called Turkey's "unnecessary, petty initiative", and that "with this backward action, Turkey is opting to sever links withwestern world and its values".[196] In relation to both Hagia Sophia and theCyprus–Turkey maritime zones dispute, Mitsotakis called for European sanctions against Turkey, referring to it as "a regional troublemaker, and which is evolving into a threat to the stability of the whole south-east Mediterranean region".[196]Dora Bakoyannis, Greek former foreign minister, said Turkey's actions had "crossed the Rubicon", distancing itself from the West.[197]
Armenia's Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" about the move, adding that it brought to a close Hagia Sophia's symbolism of "cooperation and unity of humankind instead of clash of civilizations."[198] CatholicosKarekin II, the head of the Armenian Apostolic Church, said the move "violat[ed] the rights of national religious minorities in Turkey."[199]Sahak II Mashalian, the Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople, perceived as loyal to the Turkish government, endorsed the decision to convert the museum into a mosque. He said, "I believe that believers' praying suits better the spirit of the temple instead of curious tourists running around to take pictures."[200]
In July 2021, UNESCO asked for an updated report on the state of conservation and expressed "grave concern". There were also some concerns about the future of its World Heritage status.[201] Turkey responded that the changes had "no negative impact" on UNESCO standards and the criticism is "biased and political".[202]
a) Plan of the gallery (upper half) b) Plan of the ground floor (lower half)
Hagia Sophia is one of the greatest surviving examples ofByzantine architecture.[2] Its interior is decorated withmosaics,marble pillars, and coverings of great artistic value. Justinian had overseen the completion of the greatest cathedral ever built up to that time, and it was to remain the largest cathedral for 1,000 years until the completion of thecathedral in Seville in Spain.[203]
The Hagia Sophia uses masonry construction. The structure has brick andmortar joints that are 1.5 times the width of the bricks. The mortar joints are composed of a combination of sand and minute ceramic pieces distributed evenly throughout the mortar joints. This combination of sand andpotsherds was often used inRoman concrete, a predecessor to modernconcrete. A considerable amount of iron was used as well, in the form of cramps and ties.[204]
Justinian's basilica was at once the culminating architectural achievement oflate antiquity and the first masterpiece of Byzantine architecture. Its influence, both architecturally and liturgically, was widespread and enduring in theEastern Christianity,Western Christianity, andIslam alike.[205][206]
Cutaway isometric projection
The vast interior has a complex structure. Thenave is covered by a central dome which at its maximum is 55.6 m (182 ft 5 in) from floor level and rests on an arcade of 40 arched windows. Repairs to its structure have left the dome somewhat elliptical, with the diameter varying between 31.24 and 30.86 m (102 ft 6 in and 101 ft 3 in).[207]
At the western entrance and eastern liturgical side, there are arched openings extended by half domes of identical diameter to the central dome, carried on smallersemi-domedexedrae, a hierarchy of dome-headed elements built up to create a vast oblong interior crowned by the central dome, with a clear span of 76.2 m (250 ft).[2]
The geometric conception is based on mathematical formulas of Heron of Alexandria. It avoids use of irrational numbers for the construction
The theories ofHero of Alexandria, aHellenistic mathematician of the 1st century AD, may have been utilized to address the challenges presented by building such an expansive dome over so large a space.[208] Svenshon and Stiffel proposed that the architects used Hero's proposed values for constructing vaults. The square measurements were calculated using the side-and-diagonal number progression, which results in squares defined by the numbers 12 and 17, wherein 12 defines the side of the square and 17 its diagonal, which have been used as standard values as early as in cuneiform Babylonian texts.[209]
Each of the four sides of the great square Hagia Sophia is approximately 31 m long,[210] and it was previously thought that this was the equivalent of 100Byzantine feet.[209] Svenshon suggested that the size of the side of the central square of Hagia Sophia is not 100 Byzantine feet but instead 99 feet. This measurement is not only rational, but it is also embedded in the system of the side-and-diagonal number progression (70/99) and therefore a usable value by the applied mathematics of antiquity. It gives a diagonal of 140 which is manageable for constructing a huge dome.[211]
TheOmphalion, a marble section of the floor in Hagia Sophia, is the place where Byzantine emperors have been crowned. The stone floor of the Hagia Sophia dates from the 6th century.
The stone floor of Hagia Sophia dates from the 6th century. After the first collapse of the vault, the broken dome was leftin situ on the original Justinianic floor and a new floor was laid above the rubble when the dome was rebuilt in 558.[212] From the installation of this second Justinianic floor, the floor became part of theliturgy, with significant locations and spaces demarcated in various ways using different-coloured stones and marbles.[212]
The floor is predominantly made up ofProconnesian marble, quarried onProconnesus (Marmara Island) in thePropontis (Sea of Marmara). This was the main white marble used in the monuments of Constantinople. Other parts of the floor, like the Thessalianverd antique "marble", were quarried inThessaly inRoman Greece. The Thessalian verd antique bands across the nave floor were often likened to rivers.[213]
The floor was praised by numerous authors and repeatedly compared to a sea.[107] The Justinianic poetPaul the Silentiary likened the ambo and the solea connecting it to the sanctuary with an island in a sea, with the sanctuary itself a harbour.[107] The 9th-centuryNarratio writes of it as "like the sea or the flowing waters of a river".[107]Michael the Deacon in the 12th century also described the floor as a sea in which the ambo and other liturgical furniture stood as islands.[107]
During the 15th-century conquest of Constantinople, the Ottoman caliph Mehmed is said to have ascended to the dome and the galleries in order to admire the floor, which according toTursun Beg resembled "a sea in a storm" or a "petrified sea".[107] Other Ottoman-era authors also praised the floor;Tâcîzâde Cafer Çelebi compared it to waves of marble.[107] The floor was hidden beneath a carpet on 22 July 2020.[158]
The Imperial Gate, or Imperial Door, was the main entrance between the exo- and esonarthex, and it was originally exclusively used by the emperor.[214][215] A long ramp from the northern part of the outer narthex leads up to the upper gallery.[216]
The slope leading to the upper gallery in the Hagia Sophia
The upper gallery, ormatroneum, is horseshoe-shaped; it encloses the nave on three sides and is interrupted by the apse. Several mosaics are preserved in the upper gallery, an area traditionally reserved for the Empress and her court. The best-preserved mosaics are located in the southern part of the gallery.
The northern first floor gallery containsrunic graffiti believed to have been left by members of theVarangian Guard.[217] Structural damage caused by natural disasters is visible on the Hagia Sophia's exterior surface. To ensure that the Hagia Sophia did not sustain any damage on the interior of the building, studies have been conducted using ground penetrating radar within the gallery of the Hagia Sophia. With the use ofground-penetrating radar (GPR), teams discovered weak zones within the Hagia Sophia's gallery and also concluded that the curvature of the vault dome has been shifted out of proportion, compared to its original angular orientation.[218]
Thedome of Hagia Sophia has spurred particular interest for many art historians, architects, and engineers because of the innovative way the original architects envisioned it. The dome is carried on four spherical triangularpendentives, making the Hagia Sophia one of the first large-scale uses of this element. The pendentives are the corners of the square base of the dome, and they curve upwards into the dome to support it, thus restraining the lateral forces of the dome and allowing its weight to flow downwards.[219][220] The main dome of the Hagia Sophia was the largest pendentive dome in the world until the completion ofSt Peter's Basilica, and it has a much lower height than any other dome of such a large diameter.
The great dome at the Hagia Sophia is 32.6 metres (107 ft) in diameter and is only 0.61 metres (2 ft 0 in) thick. The main building materials for the original Hagia Sophia were brick and mortar. Brick aggregate was used to make roofs easier to construct. Due to the material's plasticity, it was chosen over cut stone due to the fact that aggregate can be used over a longer distance.[221] According to Rowland Mainstone, "it is unlikely that the vaulting-shell is anywhere more than one normal brick in thickness".[222]
The weight of the dome remained a problem for most of the building's existence. The original cupola collapsed entirely after the earthquake of 558; in 563 a new dome was built byIsidore the Younger. Unlike the original, this included 40 ribs and was raised 6.1 meters (20 feet), in order to lower the lateral forces on the church walls. A larger section of the second dome collapsed as well, over two episodes, so that as of 2021, only two sections of the present dome, the north and south sides, are from the 562 reconstructions. Of the whole dome's 40 ribs, the surviving north section contains eight ribs, while the south section includes six ribs.[223]
Although this design stabilizes the dome and the surrounding walls and arches, the actual construction of the walls of Hagia Sophia weakened the overall structure. Thebricklayers used moremortar than brick, which is more effective if the mortar was allowed to settle, as the building would have been more flexible; however, the builders did not allow the mortar to cure before they began the next layer. When the dome was erected, its weight caused the walls to lean outward because of the wet mortar underneath.[224]
When Isidore the Younger rebuilt the fallen cupola, he had first to build up the interior of the walls to make them vertical again. The architect raised the height of the rebuilt dome by approximately 6 m (20 ft) so that the lateral forces would not be as strong and its weight would be transmitted more effectively down into the walls. He shaped the new cupola like ascalloped shell or the inside of an umbrella, withribs that extend from the top down to the base. These ribs allow the weight of the dome to flow between the windows, down the pendentives, and ultimately to the foundation.[224]
Hagia Sophia is famous for the light that reflects everywhere in the interior of the nave, giving the dome the appearance of hovering. This effect was achieved by inserting forty windows around the base of the original structure, which also reduced its weight.[224]
Numerousbuttresses have been added throughout the centuries. Theflying buttresses to the west of the building, although thought to have been constructed by the Crusaders upon their visit to Constantinople, were actually built during the Byzantine era. This shows that the Romans had prior knowledge of flying buttresses, which can also be seen at in Greece, at theRotunda of Galerius inThessaloniki, at the monastery ofHosios Loukas inBoeotia, and in Italy at the octagonal basilica ofSan Vitale inRavenna.[224][225] Other buttresses were constructed during the Ottoman times under the guidance of the architectSinan. A total of 24 buttresses were added.[226]
Theminarets were an Ottoman addition and not part of the original church's Byzantine design. Mehmed had built a wooden minaret over one of the half domes soon after Hagia Sophia's conversion from a cathedral to a mosque. This minaret does not exist today. One of the minarets (at southeast) was built from red brick and can be dated back from the reign of Mehmed or his successorBeyazıd II. The other three were built from white limestone and sandstone, of which the slender northeast column was erected by Bayezid II and the two identical, larger minarets to the west were erected bySelim II and designed by the famous Ottoman architectMimar Sinan. Both are 60 m (200 ft) in height, and their thick and massive patterns complete Hagia Sophia's main structure. Many ornaments and details were added to these minarets on repairs during the 15th, 16th, and 19th centuries, which reflect each period's characteristics and ideals.[227][228]
Originally, under Justinian's reign, the interior decorations consisted of abstract designs on marble slabs on the walls and floors as well as mosaics on the curving vaults. Of these mosaics, the twoarchangelsGabriel andMichael are still visible in thespandrels (corners) of thebema. There were already a few figurative decorations, as attested by the late 6th-centuryekphrasis ofPaul the Silentiary, theDescription of Hagia Sophia. The spandrels of the gallery are faced in inlaid thin slabs (opus sectile), showing patterns and figures of flowers and birds in precisely cut pieces of white marble set against a background of black marble. In later stages, figurative mosaics were added, which were destroyed during theiconoclastic controversy (726–843). Present mosaics are from the post-iconoclastic period.
Apart from the mosaics, many figurative decorations were added during the second half of the 9th century: an image of Christ in the central dome; Eastern Orthodox saints, prophets andChurch Fathers in thetympana below; historical figures connected with this church, such asPatriarch Ignatius; and some scenes from theGospels in the galleries.Basil II let artists paint a giant six-wingedseraph on each of the four pendentives.[78] The Ottomans covered their faces with golden stars,[78] but in 2009, one of them was restored to its original state.[229]
The Loge of the Empress. The columns are made of green Thessalian stone.
Verd antique columns and disc in the empress's loggia
Lustration urn brought fromPergamon byMurad III. Carved from a single block of marble in the 2nd century BC.
Theloggia of the empress is located in the centre of the gallery of the Hagia Sophia, above the Imperial Gate and directly opposite the apse. From thismatroneum (women's gallery), theempress and the court-ladies would watch the proceedings down below. A green stone disc ofverd antique marks the spot where thethrone of the empress stood.[230][231]
The Marble Door inside the Hagia Sophia is located in the southern upper enclosure or gallery. It was used by the participants insynods, who entered and left the meeting chamber through this door. It is said[by whom?] that each side is symbolic and that one side represents heaven while the other represents hell. Its panels are covered in fruits and fish motifs. The door opens into a space that was used as a venue for solemn meetings and important resolutions of patriarchate officials.[232]
The Nice Door is the oldest architectural element found in the Hagia Sophia dating back to the 2nd century BC. The decorations are of reliefs of geometric shapes as well as plants that are believed to have come from a pagan temple inTarsus inCilicia, part of theCibyrrhaeot Theme in modern-dayMersin Province in south-eastern Turkey. It was incorporated into the building byEmperor Theophilos in 838 where it is placed in the south exit in the inner narthex.[233]
The Imperial Gate is the door that was used solely by the Emperor and his personal bodyguard and retinue.[215] At 7 metres (23 ft) it is the largest door in the Hagia Sophia and has been dated to the 6th century. Byzantine sources say it was made with wood fromNoah's Ark.[234]
In April 2022, the door was vandalised by unknown assailant(s).[235]
At the northwest of the building, there is a column with a hole in the middle covered by bronze plates. This column goes by different names; the "perspiring" or "sweating column", the "crying column", or the "wishing column". Legend states that it has been moist since the appearance ofGregory Thaumaturgus near the column in 1200. It is believed that touching the moisture cures many illnesses.[236][237]
In the southern section of Hagia Sophia, a 9th-centuryViking inscription has been discovered, which reads, "Halvdan was here." It is theorized that the inscription was created by a Viking soldier serving as a mercenary in theEastern Roman Empire.[238]
Ceiling decoration showing original Christian cross still visible through the later aniconic decoration
The first mosaics which adorned the church were completed during the reign ofJustin II.[239] Many of the non-figurative mosaics in the church come from this period. Most of the mosaics, however, were created in the 10th and 12th centuries,[240][better source needed] following the periods ofByzantine Iconoclasm.
During theSack of Constantinople in 1204, the Latin Crusaders vandalized valuable items in every important Byzantine structure of the city, including the golden mosaics of the Hagia Sophia. Many of these items were shipped toVenice, whoseDogeEnrico Dandolo had organized the invasion and sack of Constantinople after an agreement with PrinceAlexios Angelos, the son of a deposedByzantine emperor.
Following the building's conversion into a mosque in 1453, many of its mosaics were covered with plaster, due toIslam's ban on representational imagery. This process was not completed at once, and reports exist from the 17th century in which travellers note that they could still see Christian images in the former church. In 1847–1849, the building was restored byGaspare and Giuseppe Fossati, and SultanAbdulmejid I allowed them to also document any mosaics they might discover during this process, which were later archived in Swiss libraries.[241][better source needed]
This work did not include repairing the mosaics, and after recording the details about an image, the Fossatis painted it over again. The Fossatis restored the mosaics of the twohexapteryga (six-winged angels; it is uncertain whether they areseraphim orcherubim) located on the two east pendentives, and covered their faces again before the end of the restoration.[242] The other two mosaics, placed on the west pendentives, are copies in paint created by the Fossatis since they could find no surviving remains of them.[242]
As in this case, the architects reproduced in paint damaged decorative mosaic patterns, sometimes redesigning them in the process. The Fossati records are the primary sources about a number of mosaic images now believed to have been completely or partially destroyed in the1894 Istanbul earthquake. These include a mosaic over a now-unidentifiedDoor of the Poor, a large image of a jewel-encrusted cross, and many images of angels, saints, patriarchs, and church fathers. Most of the missing images were located in the building's two tympana.
One mosaic they documented isChrist Pantocrator in a circle, which would indicate it to be a ceiling mosaic, possibly even of the main dome, which was later covered and painted over with Islamic calligraphy that expounds God as the light of the universe. The Fossatis' drawings of the Hagia Sophia mosaics are today kept in the Archive of theCanton of Ticino.[243]
Many mosaics were uncovered in the 1930s by a team from theByzantine Institute of America led byThomas Whittemore. The team chose to let a number of simple cross images remain covered by plaster but uncovered all major mosaics found.
Because of its long history as both a church and a mosque, a particular challenge arises in the restoration process. Christianiconographic mosaics can be uncovered, but often at the expense of important and historic Islamic art. Restorers have attempted to maintain a balance between both Christian and Islamic cultures. In particular, much controversy rests upon whether theIslamic calligraphy on the dome of the cathedral should be removed, to permit the underlying Pantocrator mosaic of Christ as Master of the World to be exhibited (assuming the mosaic still exists).[244]
The Hagia Sophia has been a victim of natural disasters that have caused deterioration to the buildings structure and walls. The deterioration of the Hagia Sophia's walls can be directly attributed to salt crystallization. The crystallization of salt is due to an intrusion of rainwater that causes the Hagia Sophia's deteriorating inner and outer walls. Diverting excess rainwater is the main solution to the deteriorating walls at the Hagia Sophia.[245]
Built between 532 and 537, a subsurface structure under the Hagia Sophia has been under investigation, using LaCoste-Romberggravimeters to determine the depth of the subsurface structure and to discover other hidden cavities beneath the Hagia Sophia. The hidden cavities have also acted as a support system against earthquakes. With these findings using the LaCoste-Romberg gravimeters, it was also discovered that the Hagia Sophia's foundation is built on a slope of natural rock.[246]
The Imperial Gate mosaic is located in thetympanum above that gate, which was used only by the emperors when entering the church. Based on style analysis, it has been dated to the late 9th or early 10th century. The emperor with animbus or halo could possibly represent emperorLeo VI the Wise or his sonConstantine VII Porphyrogenitus bowing down before Christ Pantocrator, seated on a jewelled throne, giving his blessing and holding in his left hand an open book.[247]
The southwestern entrance mosaic, situated in the tympanum of the southwestern entrance, dates from the reign ofBasil II.[248] It was rediscovered during the restorations of 1849 by the Fossatis. The Virgin sits on a throne without a back, her feet resting on a pedestal, embellished with precious stones. TheChrist Child sits on her lap, giving his blessing and holding a scroll in his left hand. On her left side stands emperor Constantine in ceremonial attire, presenting a model of the city to Mary. On her right side stands emperorJustinian I, offering a model of the Hagia Sophia.[249] The composition of the figure of the Virgin enthroned was probably copied from the mosaic inside the semi-dome of the apse inside the liturgical space.[250]
The mosaic in thesemi-dome above the apse at the east end showsMary, mother of Jesus holding theChrist Child and seated on a jewelledthokos backless throne.[250] Since its rediscovery after a period of concealment in the Ottoman era, it "has become one of the foremost monuments of Byzantium".[250] The infant Jesus's garment is depicted with goldentesserae.
Guillaume-Joseph Grelot, who had travelled to Constantinople, in 1672 engraved and in 1680 published in Paris an image of the interior of Hagia Sophia which shows the apse mosaic indistinctly.[250] Together with a picture by Cornelius Loos drawn in 1710, these images are early attestations of the mosaic before it was covered towards the end of the 18th century.[250] The mosaic of the Virgin and Child was rediscovered during the restorations of the Fossati brothers in 1847–1848 and revealed by the restoration of Thomas Whittemore in 1935–1939.[250] It was studied again in 1964 with the aid of scaffolding.[250][251]
It is not known when this mosaic was installed.[250] According toCyril Mango, the mosaic is "a curious reflection on how little we know about Byzantine art".[252] The work is generally believed to date from after the end ofByzantine Iconoclasm and usually dated to the patriarchate ofPhotius I (r. 858–867, 877–886) and the time of the emperorsMichael III (r. 842–867) andBasil I (r. 867–886).[250] Most specifically, the mosaic has been connected with a survivinghomily known to have been written and delivered by Photius in the cathedral on 29 March 867.[250][253][254][255][256]
Other scholars have favoured earlier or later dates for the present mosaic or its composition.Nikolaos Oikonomides pointed out that Photius's homily refers to a standing portrait of theTheotokos – aHodegetria – while the present mosaic shows her seated.[257] Likewise, a biography of the patriarchIsidore I (r. 1347–1350) by his successorPhilotheus I (r. 1353–1354, 1364–1376) composed before 1363 describes Isidore seeing a standing image of the Virgin atEpiphany in 1347.[250]
Serious damage was done to the building by earthquakes in the 14th century, and it is possible that a standing image of the Virgin that existed in Photius's time was lost in the earthquake of 1346, in which the eastern end of Hagia Sophia was partly destroyed.[258][250] This interpretation supposes that the present mosaic of the Virgin and Child enthroned is of the late 14th century, a time in which, beginning withNilus of Constantinople (r. 1380–1388), the patriarchs of Constantinople began to have officialseals depicting theTheotokos enthroned on athokos.[259][250]
Still other scholars have proposed an earlier date than the later 9th century. According to George Galavaris, the mosaic seen by Photius was aHodegetria portrait which after the earthquake of 989 was replaced by the present image not later than the early 11th century.[259][258] According to Oikonomides however, the image in fact dates to before theTriumph of Orthodoxy, having been completedc. 787–797, during theiconodule interlude between the First Iconoclast (726–787) and the Second Iconoclast (814–842) periods.[257] Having been plastered over in the Second Iconoclasm, Oikonomides argues a new, standing image of the VirginHodegetria was created above the older mosaic in 867, which then fell off in the earthquakes of the 1340s and revealed again the late 8th-century image of the Virgin enthroned.[257]
More recently, analysis of ahexaptychmenologion icon panel fromSaint Catherine's Monastery atMount Sinai has determined that the panel, showing numerous scenes from thelife of the Virgin and other theologically significant iconic representations, contains an image at the centre very similar to that in Hagia Sophia.[250] The image is labelled in Greek merely as:Μήτηρ Θεοῦ,romanized: Mētēr Theou,lit. 'Mother of God', but in theGeorgian language the inscription reveals the image is labelled "of the semi-dome of Hagia Sophia".[250] This image is therefore the oldest depiction of the apse mosaic known and demonstrates that the apse mosaic's appearance was similar to the present day mosaic in the late 11th or early 12th centuries, when the hexaptych was inscribed in Georgian by a Georgian monk, which rules out a 14th-century date for the mosaic.[250]
The portraits of the archangels Gabriel and Michael (largely destroyed) in thebema of the arch also date from the 9th century. The mosaics are set against the original golden background of the 6th century. These mosaics were believed to be a reconstruction of the mosaics of the 6th century that were previously destroyed during the iconoclastic era by the Byzantines of that time, as represented in the inaugural sermon by the patriarch Photios. However, no record of figurative decoration of Hagia Sophia exists before this time.[260]
The Emperor Alexander mosaic is not easy to find for the first-time visitor, located on the second floor in a dark corner of the ceiling. It depicts the emperorAlexander in full regalia, holding a scroll in his right hand and aglobus cruciger in his left. A drawing by the Fossatis showed that the mosaic survived until 1849 and thatThomas Whittemore, founder of theByzantine Institute of America who was granted permission to preserve the mosaics, assumed that it had been destroyed in the earthquake of 1894. Eight years after his death, the mosaic was discovered in 1958 largely through the researches ofRobert Van Nice. Unlike most of the other mosaics in Hagia Sophia, which had been covered over by ordinary plaster, the Alexander mosaic was simply painted over and reflected the surrounding mosaic patterns and thus was well hidden. It was duly cleaned by the Byzantine Institute's successor to Whittemore,Paul A. Underwood.[261][262]
The Empress Zoe mosaic on the eastern wall of the southern gallery dates from the 11th century. Christ Pantocrator, clad in the dark blue robe (as is the custom in Byzantine art), is seated in the middle against a golden background, giving his blessing with the right hand and holding theBible in his left hand. On either side of his head are thenomina sacraIC andXC, meaningIēsous Christos. He is flanked byConstantine IX Monomachus andEmpress Zoe, both in ceremonial costumes. He is offering a purse, as a symbol of donation, he made to the church, while she is holding a scroll, symbol of the donations she made. The previous heads have been scraped off and replaced by the three present ones. Perhaps the earlier mosaic showed her first husbandRomanus III Argyrus or her second husbandMichael IV. Another theory is that this mosaic was made for an earlier emperor and empress, with their heads changed into the present ones.[263]
The Comnenus mosaic, also located on the eastern wall of the southern gallery, dates from 1122. The Virgin Mary is standing in the middle, depicted, as usual in Byzantine art, in a dark blue gown. She holds the Christ Child on her lap. He gives his blessing with his right hand while holding a scroll in his left hand. On her right side stands emperorJohn II Comnenus, represented in a garb embellished with precious stones. He holds a purse, symbol of an imperial donation to the church.[264]
His wife, the empressIrene of Hungary stands on the left side of the Virgin, wearing ceremonial garments and holding aneiletarion scroll. Their eldest sonAlexius Comnenus is represented on an adjacent pilaster. He is shown as a beardless youth, probably representing his appearance at his coronation aged seventeen.[265]
In this panel, one can already see a difference with the Empress Zoe mosaic that is one century older. There is a more realistic expression in the portraits instead of an idealized representation. The Empress Irene, daughter ofLadislaus I of Hungary, is shown with plaited blond hair, rosy cheeks, and grey eyes, revealing herHungarian descent. The emperor is depicted in a dignified manner.[266]
TheDeësis mosaic (Δέησις, "Entreaty") probably dates from 1261. It was commissioned to mark the end of 57 years of Latin Catholic use and the return to the Eastern Orthodox faith. It is the third panel situated in the imperial enclosure of the upper galleries. It is widely considered the finest in Hagia Sophia, because of the softness of the features, the humane expressions and the tones of the mosaic. The style is close to that of the Italian painters of the late 13th or early 14th century, such asDuccio. In this panel theVirgin Mary andJohn the Baptist are imploring theintercession of Christ Pantocrator for humanity onJudgment Day. The bottom part of this mosaic is badly deteriorated.[267] This mosaic is considered as the beginning of a renaissance in Byzantinepictorial art.[268]
The northerntympanum mosaics feature various saints. They have been able to survive due to their high and inaccessible location. They depict Patriarchs of ConstantinopleJohn Chrysostom andIgnatios of Constantinople standing, clothed in white robes with crosses, and holding richly jewelled Bibles. The figures of each patriarch, revered as saints, are identifiable by labels in Greek. The other mosaics in the other tympana have not survived probably due to the frequent earthquakes, as opposed to any deliberate destruction by the Ottoman conquerors.[269]
The dome was decorated with four non-identical figures of the six-winged angels which protect theThrone of God; it is uncertain whether they areseraphim orcherubim. The mosaics survive in the eastern part of the dome, but since the ones on the western side were damaged during the Byzantine period, they have been renewed asfrescoes. During the Ottoman period each face was covered with metallic lids in the shape of stars, but these were removed to reveal the faces during renovations in 2009.[270]
TheChurch of Saint Sava inBelgrade has been modelled after Hagia Sophia, using its primary square and the size of its dome.The interior of the Church of Saint Sava
Many buildings have been modeled on the Hagia Sophia's core structure of a large central dome resting on pendentives and buttressed by two semi-domes.
Byzantine churches influenced by the Hagia Sophia include theHagia Sophia in Thessaloniki, and theHagia Irene. The Hagia Irene was remodeled to have a dome similar to the Hagia Sophia's during the reign of Justinian.Neo-Byzantine churches modeled on the Hagia Sophia include theKronstadt Naval Cathedral,Holy Trinity Cathedral, Sibiu[271] andPoti Cathedral. Each closely replicates the internal geometry of the Hagia Sophia. The layout of the Kronstadt Naval Cathedral is nearly identical to the Hagia Sophia in size and geometry. Its marble revetment mimics the style of the Hagia Sophia.[272]
^Curta, Florin; Holt, Andrew (2016).Great Events in Religion: An Encyclopedia of Pivotal Events in Religious History [3 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p. 299.ISBN978-1-61069-566-4.Hagia Sophia was consecrated on December 27, 537, five years after construction had begun. The church was dedicated to the Wisdom of God, referring to theLogos (the second entity of the Trinity) or, alternatively, Christ as the Logos incarnate.
^abcFazio, Michael; Moffett, Marian; Wodehouse, Lawrence (2009).Buildings Across Time (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.ISBN978-0-07-305304-2.
^Hamm, Jean S. (2010).Term Paper Resource Guide to Medieval History. ABC-CLIO. p. 39.ISBN978-0-313-35967-5.Hagia Sophia, or the Church of Holy Wisdom, is one of the world's most spectacular churches, representing not only great beauty, but also masterful engineering.
^"Hagia Sophia".Hagia Sophia | History, Facts, & Significance.Encyclopædia Britannica. 14 August 2023.The original church on the site of the Hagia Sophia is said to have been ordered to be built by Constantine I in 325 on the foundations of a pagan temple.
^Crawford, Peter (2019).Roman Emperor Zeno: The Perils of Power Politics in Fifth-Century Constantinople. Newburyport: Pen & Sword Books. p. 14.ISBN978-1-4738-5927-2.OCLC1206400173.
^Theodosius, Earlier Second Church Ordered by I. I.; Rufinus, Built by Architect; Justinian, Current Church was Ordered by Emperor; Tralles, Designed by Greek Scientists Isidore of Miletus Anthemius of."Exterior, Walls and Architectural Elements".Earlier second church ordered by Theodosius II, built by architect Rufinus, current Church was ordered by Emperor Justinian and designed by Greek scientists Isidore of Miletus and Anthemius of Tralles
^Krautheimer, Richard (1986).Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (4th ed.). New Haven and London: Yale University Press/Pelican History of Art. p. 205.ISBN978-0-300-05296-1.
^"The Chronicle of John Malalas," Bk 18.86 Translated by E. Jeffreys, M. Jeffreys, and R. Scott. Australian Association of Byzantine Studies, 1986 vol 4.
^"The Chronicle of Theophones Confessor: Byzantine and Near Eastern History AD 284–813." Translated with commentary by Cyril Mango and Roger Scott. AM 6030 p. 316, with this note: Theophanes' precise date should be accepted.
^abSakar, Sonay; Yuksel, Fethi Ahmet; Hoskan, Nihan; Avci, Emine; Avci, Kerim; Erguven, Kubra (20 March 2014),"The gpr measurements on hagia sophia's surfaces facing the naos",Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2014, Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings, Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society, p. 558,doi:10.4133/sageep.27-200, retrieved19 June 2021
^Hamblin, William J. (2008)."Arab perspectives on the Fourth Crusade". In Madden, Thomas F. (ed.).The Fourth Crusade: Event, Aftermath, and Perceptions: Papers from the Sixth Conference of the Society for the Study of the Crusades and the Latin East, Istanbul, Turkey, 25-29 August 2004. Society for the Study of the Crusades and the Latin East. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 175.ISBN978-0-7546-6319-5.
^Hurbanič, Martin (2019), Hurbanič, Martin (ed.),"Conclusion",The Avar Siege of Constantinople in 626: History and Legend, New Approaches to Byzantine History and Culture, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 339–349,doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16684-7_15,ISBN978-3-030-16684-7, retrieved20 October 2020
^Inalcik, Halil (1969). "The Policy of Mehmed II toward the Greek Population of Istanbul and the Byzantine Buildings of the City".Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 23/24:229–249.doi:10.2307/1291293.ISSN0070-7546.JSTOR1291293.
^abBloom, Jonathan; Blair, Sheila (2009)."Istanbul".Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture. Oxford University Press USA. p. 324.ISBN978-0-19-530991-1.
^Pedone, Silvia (2011). "The MarbleOmphalos of Saint Sophia in Constantinople. An Analysis of anOpus Sectile Pavement of Middle Byzantine Age". In Şahin, Mustafa (ed.).11th International Colloquium on Ancient Mosaics, October 16th-20th, 2009, Bursa, Turkey: Mosaics of Turkey and parallel developments in the rest of the ancient and medieval world: questions of iconography, style and technique from the beginnings of mosaic until the late Byzantine era. İstanbul: Uludağ Üniversitesi, Mozaik Araştırmaları Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi. pp. 749–768.ISBN978-605-5607-81-4.OCLC801099151.
^"Hagia Sophia". World Monuments Fund. Retrieved4 December 2011.
^Melton, J. Gordon; Baumann, Martin (2010).Religions of the World: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices. ABC-CLIO. p. 513.
^Syrmakezis, K.; Mavrouli, O.; Papaevaggeliou, P.; Aggelakopolulou, E.; Bakolas, A.; Moropoulou, A. (November 2013). "Finite element analysis and fragility curves for the evaluation of restoration mortars behavior regarding the earthquake protection of historic structures".Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.54:61–65.Bibcode:2013SDEE...54...61S.doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.002.ISSN0267-7261.
^abSvenshon, Helge Olaf: Heron of Alexandria and the Dome of Hagia Sophia in Istanbul. In: Proceedings of the Third Congress on Construction History. Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, 20th – 24th May 2009. NEUNPLUS1, Berlin, S. 1387–1394.ISBN978-3-936033-31-1
^Majeska, George P. (1978). "Notes on the Archeology of St. Sophia at Constantinople: The Green Marble Bands on the Floor".Dumbarton Oaks Papers.32:299–308.doi:10.2307/1291426.ISSN0070-7546.JSTOR1291426.
^Mel'nikova, Elena A. (2016).A New Runic Inscription from Hagia Sophia Cathedral in Istanbul. Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.OCLC1233690226.
^Yalçıner, Cahit Çağlar; Kurban, Yunus Can; Altunel, Erhan (May 2017). "Research using GPR into the cause of cracks and depressions in the floor of the gallery of Hagia Sophia Museum".Construction and Building Materials.139:458–66.doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.036.ISSN0950-0618.
^Kleiner and Mamiya.Gardner's Art Through the Ages, p. 331.
^Mainstone, Rowland J. (2001).Hagia Sophia. London: Thames & Hudson. pp. 90–93.ISBN978-0-500-27945-8.
^abcdMainstone, R.J. (Rowland J.) (1988).Hagia Sophia: Architecture, structure, and liturgy of Justinian's great church. New York: Thames and Hudson.ISBN978-0-500-34098-1.OCLC15378795.
^Patricios, Nicholas N. (27 March 2014).The Sacred Architecture of Byzantium: Art, Liturgy and Symbolism in Early Christian Churches. London: I. B. Tauris.ISBN978-1-78076-291-3.OCLC879616183.
^Gökovali, Şadan.Istanbul. Istanbul: Ticaret Matbaacilik T.A.Ş. p. 27.
^Lorenzo Riccardi, Observations on Basil II as Patron of the Arts, in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art, I, Collection of articles. Materials of the Conference of Young Specialists (St. Petersburg State University, 1–5 December 2010), St. Petersburg 2011 (ISBN978-5-288-05174-6), pp. 39–45; Lorenzo Riccardi, Alcune riflessioni sul mosaico del vestibolo sud-ovest della Santa Sofia di Costantinopoli, in Vie per Bisanzio. VIII Congresso Nazionale dell'Associazione Italiana di Studi Bizantini (Venezia 25–28 novembre 2009), a cura di Antonio Rigo, Andrea Babuin e Michele Trizio, Bari, Edizioni di Pagina 2012 (ISBN978-88-7470-229-9), pp. 357–71.
^abGalavaris, George P. (1964). "Observations on the date of the apse mosaic of the church of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople".Actes du XIIe Congrès International des Études Byzantines.3:107–110.
Heinle, Erwin; Schlaich, Jörg (1996).Kuppeln: aller Zeiten, aller Kulturen. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.ISBN3-421-03062-6.OCLC1126355641.
Hoffman, Volker (1999).Die Hagia Sophia in Istanbul (in German). Bern: Lang.ISBN978-3-906762-81-4.
Janin, Raymond (1953).La Géographie Ecclésiastique de l'Empire Byzantin. 1. Part: Le Siège de Constantinople et le Patriarcat Oecuménique. 3rd Vol. : Les Églises et les Monastères. Paris: Institut Français d'Études Byzantines.
Mainstone, Rowland J. (1997).Hagia Sophia: Architecture, Structure, and Liturgy of Justinian's Great Church (reprint ed.). W.W. Norton & Co.ISBN978-0-500-27945-8..
Mamboury, Ernest (1953).The Tourists' Istanbul. Istanbul: Çituri Biraderler Basımevi.
Müller-Wiener, Wolfgang (1977).Bildlexikon zur Topographie Istanbuls: Byzantion, Konstantinupolis, Istanbul bis zum Beginn d. 17 Jh (in German). Tübingen: Wasmuth.ISBN978-3-8030-1022-3.
Necipoĝlu, Gulru (2005).The Age of Sinan: Architectural Culture in the Ottoman Empire. London: Reaktion Books.ISBN978-1-86189-244-7.
Ronchey, Silvia; Braccini, Tommaso (2010).Il romanzo di Costantinopoli. Guida letteraria alla Roma d'Oriente (in Italian). Torino: Einaudi.ISBN978-88-06-18921-1.
Stroth, Fabian (2021).Monogrammkapitelle. Die justinianische Bauskulptur Konstantinopels als Textträger (in German). Wiesbaden: Reichert.ISBN978-3-95490-272-9.
Doumato, Lamia (1980).The Byzantine church of Hagia Sophia: Selected references. Vance Bibliographies.ASINB0006E2O2M.
Goriansky, Lev Vladimir (1933).Haghia Sophia: analysis of the architecture, art and spirit behind the shrine in Constantinople dedicated to Hagia Sophia. American School of Philosophy.ASINB0008C47EA.
Glinavos, I. (2021). "Hagia Sophia at ICSID? The Limits of Sovereign Discretion".European Yearbook of International Economic Law. Vol. 12. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 253–273.doi:10.1007/8165_2021_78.ISBN978-3-031-05082-4.
Harris, Jonathan,Constantinople: Capital of Byzantium. Hambledon/Continuum (2007).ISBN978-1-84725-179-4
Howland Swift, Emerson (1937).The bronze doors of the gate of the horologium at Hagia Sophia. University of Chicago.ASINB000889GIG.
Kleinbauer, W. Eugene (2000).Saint Sophia at Constantinople: Singulariter in Mundo (Monograph (Frederic Lindley Morgan Chair of Architectural Design), No. 5.). William L. Bauhan.ISBN978-0-87233-123-5.
Mainstone, R.J. (1997).Hagia Sophia: Architecture, Structure, and Liturgy of Justinian's Great Church. London: Thames & Hudson.ISBN978-0-500-27945-8.
Mainstone, Rowland J. (1988).Hagia Sophia. Architecture, structure and liturgy of Justinian's great church. London: Thames & Hudson.ISBN978-0-500-34098-1.
Mango, Cyril A.; Ahmed Ertuğ (1997).Hagia Sophia: A Vision for Empires. Istanbul: Ertuğ & Kocabiyik.OCLC38949865.
Mark, R.; Çakmaktitle, AS. (1992).Hagia Sophia from the Age of Justinian to the Present. Princeton Architectural.ISBN978-1-878271-11-2.
Nelson, Robert S. (2004).Hagia Sophia, 1850–1950: Holy Wisdom Modern Monument. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.ISBN978-0-226-57171-3.
Özkul, T. A. (2007).Structural characteristics of Hagia Sophia: I-A finite element formulation for static analysis. Elsevier.
Scharf, Joachim: "Der Kaiser in Proskynese. Bemerkungen zur Deutung des Kaisermosaiks im Narthex der Hagia Sophia von Konstantinopel". In:Festschrift Percy Ernst Schramm zu seinem siebzigsten Geburtstag von Schülern und Freunden zugeeignet, Wiesbaden 1964, pp. 27–35.
Strube, Christine (1973).Polyeuktoskirche und Hagia Sophia. Umbildung und Auflösung antiker Formen, Entstehen des Kämpferkapitells. Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.ISBN3-7696-0087-8.
Swainson, Harold (2005).The Church of Sancta Sophia Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine Building. Boston, MA: Adamant Media Corporation.ISBN978-1-4021-8345-4.
Alchermes, Joseph D. (2005). "Art and Architecture in the Age of Justinian". In Maas, Michael (ed.).The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. pp. 343–75.ISBN978-0-521-52071-3.
Pantelić, Bratislav. “Applied Geometrical Planning and Proportions in the Church of Hagia Sophia in Istanbul.”Istanbuler Mitteilungen 49 (1999): 493–515.
MacDonald, William Lloyd (1951).The uncovering of Byzantine mosaics in Hagia Sophia. Archaeological Institute of America.ASINB0007GZTKS.
Mango, Cyril (1972).The mosaics of St. Sophia at Istanbul: The church fathers in the north Tympanum. Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies.ASINB0007CAVA0.
Mango, Cyril (1968).The Apse mosaics of St. Sophia at Istanbul: Report on work carried out in 1964. Johnson Reprints.ASINB0007G5RBY.
Mango, Cyril; Heinz Kahler (1967).Hagia Sophia: With a Chapter on the Mosaics. Praeger.ASINB0000CO5IL.
Teteriatnikov, Natalia B. (1998).Mosaics of Hagia Sophia, Istanbul: The Fossati Restoration and the Work of the Byzantine Institute. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.ISBN978-0-88402-264-0.