The HQ-9 is a derivative of the RussianS-300.[3][4][7] Justin Bronk of theRoyal United Services Institute describes the missile as a "hybrid design based on the Russian SA-20 but withradar, seeker head andC2 elements heavily influenced by American and Israeli technology."[7]
The missile usestrack-via-missile (TVM) guidance combining inertial guidance, mid-course uplink, and terminal active radar.[8] The TVM used on earlier missiles may have been developed from aUnited StatesMIM-104 Patriot missile purchased fromIsrael orGermany.[6]
According to a 2001 article fromDefence International, the HQ-9 is 6.8 m. long with a mass of nearly two tons. The diameters of the first and second stages are 700 mm and 560 mm, respectively. The warhead mass is 180 kg, and the maximum speed isMach 4.2. The HQ-9 may usefire-control radars from other Chinese SAM systems.[9]
HQ-9A — Improved version, first tested in 1999 and service entry in 2001.[1]
HQ-9B — Improved version with a range of up to 260 km and added passive infrared seeker.[4] Reportedly tested in February 2006.[1]
Ballistic missile defense and anti-satellite
HQ-19 (NATO reporting name:CH-AB-2)[10] – Anti-ballistic missile variant, reportedly designed to countermedium-range ballistic missiles. It targets ballistic missiles in their midcourse and terminal phases, and it is comparable to the USTHAAD.[11] The missile may have "begun preliminary operations" by 2018.[12]
Export
FD-2000 – Export variant with a range of 125 km.[6] May be fitted with YLC-20passive radar againststealthy targets.[13] May use the HT-233 target-acquisition radar,[14] Type 120 low-altitude search radar, and Type 305AAESA search radar.[13]
FD-2000B – Export variant with a range of 250 km.[1]
HQ-9P – Custom variant forPakistan. Range of 125 km for interception against aircraft and around 25 km againstcruise missiles.[15][16]
The HQ-9 was a contender in Turkey's T-LORAMIDS program, and it was reportedly selected as the winner in September 2013.[17] The United States responded by blocking funds to integrate the Chinese system into NATO defenses.[18] However, through 2013 there was no confirmation that the deal had been finalized.[19][20][21] In February 2015, theGrand National Assembly of Turkey was informed by the Ministry of National Defence that the evaluation of bids was complete and that the chosen system would be used by Turkey without integration with NATO; the system was not explicitly named. However, other Turkish officials reported that no winner had been selected.[22] Later in the month, Turkish officials revealed that negotiations were ongoing with multiple bidders; the Chinese bid had not yet satisfied requirements concerning technology transfer.[23] In March 2015, aChina Daily article reported that it was "well-known that the Chinese FD-2000 system, a HQ-9 model for export, was chosen for the contract with Turkey in 2013" based on comments made by a CPMIEC representative at the 2015Langkawi International Maritime and Aerospace Exhibition; the article was misleadingly called "Missile sale to Turkey confirmed."[24] In November 2015, Turkey confirmed it would not purchase the HQ-9, opting for an indigenously developed system instead.[25]
ThePakistan Army operates the HQ-9/P variant.[16] Negotiations for the purchase of the HQ-9 and HQ-16 by Pakistan began in early 2015.[29] The missiles officially entered service on October 14, 2021.[16]
Dahm, J. Michael (March 2021).Offensive and Defensive Strike(PDF) (Report). South China Sea Military Capabilities Series. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Retrieved11 December 2021.
%2c_Penang_Strait%2c_Penang.jpg)
