Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

HMSVictory

Coordinates:50°48′07″N1°06′35″W / 50.80194°N 1.10972°W /50.80194; -1.10972
This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1765 first-rate ship of the line of the Royal Navy
For other ships with the same name, seeList of ships named HMSVictory.

Clockwise from top: HMSVictory at Portsmouth Historic Dockyard, view of the ship'sstern, Bird's-eye view ofVictory in 2004, on harbour service circa 1900, view of the bow.
History
United Kingdom
NameHMSVictory
Ordered14 July 1758
BuilderChatham Dockyard
Laid down23 July 1759
Launched7 May 1765; 260 years ago (1765-05-07)
CommissionedMarch 1778
In service248 years
Home port
Honours and
awards
Status
General characteristics[1]
Class & type104-gunfirst-rateship of the line
Displacement3,500long tons (3,600tonnes)[2]
Tons burthen2,142bm
Length
  • 186 ft (57 m) (gundeck),
  • 227 ft 6 in (69.34 m) (overall)
Beam51 ft 10 in (15.80 m)
Draught28 ft 9 in (8.76 m)
Depth of hold21 ft 6 in (6.55 m)
PropulsionSails—6,510 sq yd (5,440 m2)
Sail planFull-rigged ship
Speedup to 11 knots (20 km/h)
ComplementApproximately 850
Armament
NotesHeight from waterline to top of mainmast: 205 ft (62.5 m)

HMSVictory is a 104-gunfirst-rate wooden sailingship of the line. With 248 years of service as of 2026, she is the world'soldest naval vessel still incommission.[Note 1] She was ordered for theRoyal Navy in 1758, during theSeven Years' War, andlaid down in 1759. That year saw British victories atQuebec,Minden,Lagos andQuiberon Bay and these may have influenced the choice of name when it was selected in October the following year. In particular, the action in Quiberon Bay had a profound effect on the course of the war; severely weakening theFrench Navy and shifting its focus away from the sea. There was therefore no urgency to complete the ship and the signing of theTreaty of Paris in February 1763 meant that whenVictory was finallyfloated out in 1765, she was placedin ordinary. Her construction had taken 6,000 trees, 90% of themoak.

Victory was first commissioned in March 1778 during theAmerican Revolutionary War, seeing action at theFirst Battle of Ushant in 1778, shortly after France had openly declared her support forBritain's rebel colonies inNorth America, and theSecond Battle of Ushant in 1781. After taking part in therelief of Gibraltar in 1782,Victory, and the fleet she was sailing with, encountered a combined Spanish and French force at theBattle of Cape Spartel. Much of the shot from the allied ships fell short and the British, with orders to return to theEnglish Channel, did not bother to reply. This was her last action of the war; hostilities ended in 1783 andVictory was placed in ordinary once more.

In 1787,Victory was ordered to be fitted for sea following arevolt in the Netherlands but the threat had subsided before the work had been completed. She was ready for theNootka Crisis andRussian Armament in 1790 but both events were settled before she was called into action. During theFrench Revolutionary War,Victory served in theMediterranean Fleet, co-operating in theoccupation of Toulon in August and theInvasion of Corsica between February and August 1794. She was at theBattle of the Hyeres Islands in 1795 and theBattle of Cape St Vincent in 1797. When AdmiralHoratio Nelson was appointedCommander-in-Chief of the Mediterranean Fleet in 1803, he hoisted his flag aboardVictory and in 1805 took her into action at theBattle of Trafalgar. She served as a harbour ship from 1824 until 1922, when she was placed indry dock atPortsmouth, England. Here she was repaired and is now maintained as amuseum ship. From October 2012Victory has been the flagship of theFirst Sea Lord.

Design, construction and armament

[edit]

In December 1758, theBritish Prime Minister,William Pitt the Elder, requested the building of 12 ships and within a matter of days, orders were received atChatham Dockyard to start work on a first-rateship-of-the-line as soon as a dry dock was available.[4][5] Ships-of-the-line of this period were three-masted,fully-rigged vessels that were strong enough and powerful enough to operate in theline of battle,[6][7] and first rates were the most formidable, carrying 100 or morecannon on three continuousgun decks.[8]

Sir Thomas Slade,naval architect andSurveyor of the Navy was selected to design the ship, the lines of which were copied fromHMS Royal George of 100 guns, built atWoolwich Dockyard three years earlier.[9] The mastershipwright in charge of construction at Chatham was John Lock but following his death in 1762, the position passed toEdward Allin, son of SirJoseph Allin, former Surveyor of the Navy.[10] Thekeel was laid on 23 July 1759 in the Old Single Dock (since renamed No. 2 Dock and now Victory Dock), and the nameVictory was chosen in October 1760.[11]

The Seven Years' War had been going badly for Britain until 1759, when battles were won at Quebec, Minden, Lagos and Quiberon Bay. It was theAnnus Mirabilis, or Wonderful Year, and the victories may have been in mind when the ship's name was selected.[12][13] Alternatively, it may have been determined becauseVictory was the only name not in use of the seven shortlisted. There were reservations as to whether the choice was appropriate as theprevious ship of that name had been lost with all hands in 1744.[14][15]

Around 6,000 trees provided the timber for the ship and 150 men were required to assemble her. Of the wood used in her construction, 90% was oak and the remainderelm,pine andfir, together with a small quantity oflignum vitae. Six-foot copper bolts were employed to hold the frame together, supported bytreenails for the smaller fittings.[16][17] As built, she measured 186 feet 0 inches (56.7 metres) along the gun deck, 152 ft6+58 in (46.5 m) at the keel, with abeam of51 ft7+12 in (15.7 m) and adepth in hold of 21 ft 6 in (6.55 m).[18] This made her 2,1625394 tons (bm) and shedisplaced 3,500long tons (3,560tonnes).[18][19]

Once built, it was normal to cover the frame and leave it for several months to allow the wood to dry out or "season". French naval power had been severely weakened by the events in Quiberon Bay however and there was no immediate need forVictory which was left for nearly three years. This additional seasoning had a beneficial effect on her subsequent longevity.[20][21][22] Work restarted in autumn 1763 and she wasfloated on 7 May 1765,[23] having cost£57,748.1.7d.[18] During the 18th century,Victory was one of ten first-rate ships to be constructed.[24]

When the time came to moveVictory out of dock, shipwright Hartly Larkin designated "foreman afloat" for the event, noticed the ship appeared too wide to pass through the gates. Measurements confirmed the gap to be at least 9½ inches too narrow. Larkin's superior, Allin, considered abandoning the launch but Larkin enlisted the help of all the available shipwrights who, with theiradzes were able to remove sufficient wood from the dock gates to allow the ship through.[25] Once afloat a number of issues became apparent: A distinct list tostarboard was corrected with the addition and redistribution ofballast to bring her upright but this exacerbated an existing and altogether more serious problem; the tendency for her to sit heavily in the water such that her lower deck gunports were only 4 ft 6 in (1.4 m) above the waterline. The latter could not be rectified soVictory's sailing instructions noted that during rough weather the gunports should remain closed. This had potential to limitVictory's firepower, though in practice none of her subsequent actions would be fought in rough seas.[26]

Because the war with France had come to an end, there was no need for a strong naval presence at sea andVictory was taken down theRiver Medway where she was placed in ordinary.[27] Over the following four years, she wasfitted out at a further cost of £5,426.1.5d and took part insea trials.[28] Once rigged,Victory stood 205 ft (62.5 m) tall, from the waterline to the top of her mainmast.[2] Powered by up to 37 sails, the maximum that could be set at any one time, with a combined surface area of 5468 square metres (6510 square yards), she could achieve 11knots (12.5 miles per hour or 20.1 kilometres per hour),[29] averaging 7-8 knots in a topgallant gale.[30][Note 2] When victualled and stored for six months service,Victorydrew 24 ft 3 in (7.39 m) at thebow and 25 ft 6 in (7.77 m) at the stern.[30] Fully manned, she would carry a complement of 850 men.[18] At the conclusion of the trials in 1769, the ship was returned to her mooring.[28]

Despite the outbreak of theAmerican War of Independence in 1776,Victory remained in the Medway; she was too large to operate in the shallow waters around North America and it was reasoned that, because the Americans had no battle fleet of their own, there were sufficient British ships in service. The situation changed in 1778 when France entered the war with its powerful navy.Victory was armed with a full complement ofsmoothbore,cast iron cannon and mobilised for use in the Channel.[28][33]

Armament

[edit]
Replica 32-pound cannon onVictory's lower gundeck

Slade designedVictory as, nominally, a 100-gun ship.[34][Note 3] When she was first commissioned, she carried ten 6-pounder (2.7 kg) guns on thequarterdeck and two on theforecastle, thirty 12-pounder (5.4 kg) guns on the upper deck, twenty-eight24-pounder (11 kg) guns on the middle deck and thirty 42-pounder (19 kg) guns on the lower deck, but her ordnance changed a number of times during her career, both in terms of the number guns and the calibre.[37] When AdmiralAugustus Keppel chose Victory as hisflagship in May 1778, he ordered the 42-pounders be swapped with lighter 32-pound guns, believing the marginal loss of power was more than offset by the increased manoeuvrability and thus faster rate of fire.[19][34] Later, in April 1779, after Keppel had been replaced, the 42-pounders were reinstated, but following Vice-Admiral Horatio Nelson's appointment in 1803,Victory reverted to carrying 32-pounders once more.[19][38][Note 4]

Victory's armament was slightly upgraded in 1783 with the replacement of the 6-pounders on her upperworks with 12-pounder cannon, and the addition of twocarronade guns, firing 68-lb (31 kg) round shot, to the quarterdeck.[39][40] She carried this higher rated armament on her upperworks, plus two additional 12-pounders on the quarterdeck, when she fought at the Battle of Trafalgar, along with the thirty 32-pounders on the lower deck, twenty-eight 24-pounder guns on the middle deck, and thirty 12-pounders on the upper deck; 104 guns in total. There was also a single 18-pounder (8.2 kg) slide-mounted carronade that was kept in the hold for use in boat actions.[37] During a refit in 1806, the 24-pound guns on the middle deck were swapped for 18-pounders.[37] These were removed in 1828 to make way for short 24-pounders while, at the same time, the guns on the upper deck were replaced with cannon of the same calibre but a much longer barrel of 9 feet (2.7 m).

Early service

[edit]

First Battle of Ushant

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Ushant (1778)
The first battle of Ushant (1778) by Theodore Gudin. Admiral Keppel was later court martialled for allowing the French fleet to escape but was acquitted.

Victory was first commissioned in March 1778 under CaptainSir John Lindsay. Being appointed only to oversee fitting out and delivery of the ship to Portsmouth, he held that position until May 1778, when Admiral Augustus Keppel hoisted his flag and selected Rear AdmiralJohn Campbell and CaptainJonathan Faulknor as his first and second captains respectively.[18][28][Note 5] Keppel put to sea fromSpithead on 9 July 1778 with around twenty-nine ships-of-the-line and, on 23 July, encountered a French force of more or less equal size and strength, some miles west ofUshant.[42][43] The French admiral,Louis Guillouet, comte d'Orvilliers, who had been instructed to avoid conflict, was prevented from putting intoBrest, but retained theweather gage. Manoeuvring was hampered by constantly shifting winds and driving rain, but eventually a battle became inevitable, with the British arranged roughly in a column. The French were less organised but managed to pass along the British line with their leading ships. At about 11:45,Victory opened fire on theBretagne of 110 guns, which was being followed byVille de Paris of 90 guns.[44] The British van avoided significant damage, but SirHugh Palliser's rear division was badly mauled. Keppel ordered a pursuit, but Palliser did not conform, and the action was not resumed.[44]

Both Keppel and Palliser were court-martialled and cleared of any wrongdoing but Keppel refused to serve again and Palliser, who had been somewhat criticised at his hearing, was not considered a prudent appointment by theAdmiralty.[45] Short of commanders, SirCharles Hardy was forced out of retirement to take charge of theChannel Fleet. With Rear AdmiralRichard Kempenfelt as hisCaptain of the Fleet, Hardy raised his flag aboardVictory in the March following.[44][46]

In April, Spain agreed to aid France in the conflict with the signing of theTreaty of Aranjuez and then, on 21 June, openly declared war on Britain. On the same day, Hardy assembled his officers onVictory to give them the news. The Royal Navy was now hugely outnumbered by the combined enemy fleets and the long-planned invasion of England was now a real possibility. Lacking any real strategy, Hardy's fleet patrolled the western entrance to the Channel for any sign of the enemy.[47] In August, a Franco-Spanish fleet of 66 ships appeared offPlymouth. Hardy had his 35 ships form line of battle but was reluctant to attack such a large force and after several days the enemy left without taking any action.[47]

Second Battle of Ushant

[edit]
Main article:Second Battle of Ushant

In March 1780,Victory was brought into Portsmouth for a refit during which she wascoppered. The process involved the fixing of 3,923 sheets of copper to her hull below the waterline to protect her againstshipworm and to improve performance by inhibiting the build up of algae and marine animals.[17][48] The ship was back at sea by 2 December 1781, under the commanded of Captain Henry Cromwell and bearing Kempenfelt's flag. On learning that a Frenchconvoy had left Brest on 10 December, Kempenfelt ordered his fleet, comprisingVictory, eleven other ships of the line, a 50-gunfourth-rate, and fivefrigates to intercept.[49] The British sighted the convoy on 12 December and attacked, unaware it was protected by twenty-one ships-of-the-line under the command ofLuc Urbain de Bouexic, comte de Guichen.[49] When Kempenfelt realised he was outgunned, he retired but not before capturing fifteen sail of the convoy. The remaining French ships were scattered by strong winds and forced to return home.[49]

Siege of Gibraltar

[edit]
Main article:Great Siege of Gibraltar
Contemporary painting byRichard Paton showingVictory (centre) at the relief of Gibraltar in 1782

In October 1782,Victory was the flagship ofAdmiralRichard Howe who had been charged with providing a powerful escort for a convoy of transports carrying supplies to Gibraltar.[50] When Victory reachedCape St Vincent on 8 October, Howe had one of his frigates sail ahead. She returned on 10 October and reported that Gibraltar was still in British hands, having survived an attack the previous month.[51] A storm broke out that night which continued into the next morning. As the convoy approached its destination, Howe had his ships-of-the-line arranged in two columns withVictory leading but the blockading fleet did not come out to meet them and instead remained riding the storm out at anchor.[51] Despite Howe's warnings and guidance on how to negotiate the problematic currents, only four of the convoy managed to enter the harbour with the remainder being carried past.[52] On 14 October, fifty ships-of-the-line from the Franco-Spanish fleet began making ready for sea but a change in the wind direction the next day ensured they could not interfere and Howe was able to get the rest of the convoy into harbour.[53]

Having accomplished the mission, Howe's fleet left the Mediterranean on 19 October and at dawn the next day, encountered a superior enemy force offCape Spartel. At the subsequent Battle of Cape Spartel, the British formed line-of-battle but the enemy fleet to windward refused to close and instead opened fire from distance. Most of the shot fell short and Howe's fleet did not bother to reply. Under orders to return home, it did so without further incident. The engagement had cost the British 61 dead and 108 wounded but there were no casualties aboardVictory.[54][55] This wasVictory's last action of the war; hostilities ended in September 1783 and she was placed in ordinary.[55]

In 1787,Victory was ordered to be readied for service following a revolt in the Netherlands but before she could put to sea, aPrussian invasion, leading to the signing of theTriple Alliance treaty removed the threat.[56][57]Victory was seaworthy for the Nootka Crisis in 1790 however, when she was stationed in the Channel.[56] The crisis was resolved peacefully and after taking part in several patrols,Victory returned to Spithead on 1 September 1790. Despite paying off, she remained anchored there into the new year when she was refitted in preparation for the Russian Armament.Pilots with a specific knowledge of theBaltic Sea were taken on board in case the fleet was sent there to thwart Russian ambition but in July, a diplomatic solution was found.[58]

French Revolutionary Wars

[edit]

When the French Revolutionary War broke out in 1793,Victory joined the Mediterranean Fleet as the flagship ofVice-AdmiralSamuel Hood and took part in the occupation of Toulon in August, an action agreed with theBourbon loyalists who held the town.[59] When the British were forced to withdraw in December, they destroyed as much of the dockyard and as many enemy ships as they could and sailed to theHyeres Islands from where Hood plotted ablockade ofCorsica.[60] Resentment at French rule there had sparked a revolt led byPasquale Paoli whose guerrillas had driven the invaders into three fortified towns in the north of the island;Calvi,San Fiorenzo andBastia. Hood despatched a proportion of his fleet to prevent the French from shipping in supplies.[61]

On 24 January 1794, Hood received word that the Corsicans wished for the governance and protection of Britain and set off with his remaining ships. They were caught in a storm however and had to spend several nights sheltering off the island ofElba before heading intoPortoferraio on the 29 January for repairs.[62] The fleet eventually arrived on 7 February at San Fiorenzo, where an attack was carried out on theTorra di Mortella at the west end of the bay.Victory did not play much of an active role in the attack and on 11 February was blown off station by a strong wind. After sheltering offCap Corse, she returned on 17 February in time to see the tower captured and, soon after, the town capitulate.[63] Hood next sailed his ships to Bastia joining with a squadron under Horatio Nelson that had been blockading the town since 7 February. Despite this additional show of force, the garrison would not surrender. Troops were landed and the town was invested, leading to a protracted siege which only ended when reinforcements fromGibraltar forced the French to seek honourable terms.[64]

By June, the French had repaired much of the damage caused by the retreating British, and sailed fromToulon with seven ships-of-the-line. On hearing this, Hood left Corsica with thirteen ships of his own with the hope of bringing them to action. When the French sighted Hood's fleet on 10 June, they took refuge inGolfe Juan nearAntibes and anchored in a tight crescent formation. Hood was disinclined to attack, considering the position too well defended, and returned to Corsica.[65] Hood took his ships back to Toulon where he strengthened the blockade of the port. In November, after two years at sea, Hood returned home inVictory. Arriving off Portsmouth on 5 December, Hood struck his flag and the ship was taken in for much needed repairs.[66]

Battle of the Hyères Islands

[edit]
Main article:Battle of the Hyères Islands

By July the following year,Victory had rejoined the Mediterranean Fleet, now commanded by AdmiralWilliam Hotham in the 100-gunBritannia. Shortly after her arrival,Victory received Rear-AdmiralRobert Mann, who moved his flag from the 74-gunCumberland, and on the 8 July the fleet set off in pursuit of a French force near the Hyeres Islands.[67] On the night of 12 July the British were caught in a storm and several ships, includingVictory were damaged. The French were seen at dawn, asVictory was having new sails fitted but was ready by 08:00 when Hotham ordered a general chase.[67]Victory made good progress and along with the74sCulloden andCumberland was catching up on the French rear. A sudden shift in the wind allowed the trailing three French ships to turn and open up on the Britishvan which fired back, forcing the French 74,Alcide, to surrender.Culloden andCumberland did not stop to take possession of the stricken French ship butVictory had been much damaged in the action: all the running rigging along with much of her standing rigging, the main topgallant mast, the topsail yardarms on the foremast and the spritsail yardarms had all been shot away, and considerable damage had been done to the masts that remained.[67][68] When two French frigates arrived to tow away the crippledAlcide,Victory saw them off, sinking one of their boats in the process.[69]Hotham ordered a withdrawal of his fleet when the French took refuge inFrejus Bay; by then it was dark and alee shore wind meant the British would be trapped if they continued their pursuit.[67]

Battle of Cape St. Vincent

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Cape St. Vincent (1797)
The Battle of Cape Saint Vincent,Richard Brydges Beechey, 1881

In 1796, CaptainRobert Calder (First Captain) and CaptainGeorge Grey (Second Captain), commandedVictory under Admiral SirJohn Jervis's flag.[18][70] By the end of that year, the balance of power in the Mediterranean had shifted in favour of the French whose success on land had reduced the number of harbours amenable to British ships. Spain had switched allegiance, making her ports unavailable and substantially increasing the number of enemy ships facing the Royal Navy. Sending Nelson in the 38-gunHMS Minerve to supervise Elba's evacuation, on 16 December, Jervis withdrew his fleet to theTagus on the Portuguese coast.[71] On 18 January,Victory left Lisbon with nine other ships-of-the-line and a convoy bound for Brazil. After taking the convoy safely out to sea, Jervis positioned his ships of Cape St Vincent to await a reinforcement of five ships-of-the-line from the Channel Fleet, which arrived on 6 February underRear-Admiral William Parker.[72][73][74] Nelson, having completed his mission, was on his way to rejoin Jervis when, on the night of 11 February, he sailed undetected through the Spanish fleet in the thick fog.[75] Nelson located Jervis on 13 February who, on hearing the Spanish were at sea, immediately instructed his ships to intercept.[76] The following morning, with his 15 ships sailing in two columns, Jervis addressed his officers onVictory's quarterdeck how, "A victory to England is very essential at the moment" he impressed upon them. Jervis was ignorant of how many ships the Spanish had available, but was informed at 06:30 hours, that five had been spotted in the south-east.[70] By 09:00 hours, the first enemy ships were visible fromVictory's masthead, and at 11:00 hours, Jervis gave the order to form line of battle.[77] Calder counted the ships as they appeared out of the fog but when he reached 27, Jervis cut in, "Enough, Sir. No more of that. The die is cast and if there are 50 sail, I will go through them".[78] The Spanish were sailing in two divisions, allowing Jervis to exploit the space between.[70] The ship's log records howVictory halted the Spanish division, raking ships both ahead and astern, while Jervis' private memoirs recall howVictory's broadside so terrified the 112-gunPrincipe de Asturias that she "squared her yards, ran clear out of the battle and did not return".[79] Noticing that the major part of the Spanish fleet could pass astern and reunite with the others, Jervis signalled a course change. HoweverSir Charles Thompson, leading the rear division, chose to continue his course, leaving the following ships in confusion as to whether to proceed as their divisional commander or comply with the Admiral's order. Nelson, in the 74-gunHMS Captain, had understood Jervis' intentions and wore out of line to intercept the main fleet with other ships soon following.[80][81] This manoeuvre was instrumental in bringing about a conclusive outcome to the battle. The Spanish lost four ships in the action and were frustrated in their attempt to join their French and Dutch allies in the channel.[81] The dead and wounded from the four captured vessels ships alone amounted to 261 and 342, respectively; more than the total number of British casualties of 73 dead and 327 wounded.[82] There was one fatality aboardVictory; a cannonball narrowly missed Jervis and decapitated a nearby sailor.[81]

After putting into the Tagus for repairs, Jervis had his fleet apply a close blockade to the port ofCádiz. By this time,Victory was in some disrepair. Grey had noted a few months previous that, "...the ship is very weak abaft; the transoms between the lower and middle decks work exceedingly". Jervis, soon after the battle, echoed Grey's concerns, writing how, "...the step of a man from the poop ladder to the quarterdeck made her whole stern frame shake", and adding that, "...every line-of-battle ship in the fleet will be found sound, exceptVictory".[83]

In March, the Mediterranean fleet received reinforcements which included the recently built, 110-gunHMS Ville de Paris. She became Jervis' new flagship on 30 March andVictory was offered to Nelson who had been promoted to rear admiral following his actions off Cape St Vincent. Nelson however declined, preferring the 74-gunHMS Theseus. Jervis, elected to keepVictory in his fleet, reasoning that she was superior to his other 100-gun shipHMS Britannia, and appointed Thomas Sotheby as her captain. Discovering that Sotheby had "...neither the nerves nor experience for so great a charge", Jervis replaced him with Captain William Cumming at the end of June.[84]

Victory was sent home in August. Stopping to revictual at Lisbon, she left with four Spanish prizes on 8 September and arrived atTorbay at the end of the month. She made her final destination, the dockyard at Chatham on 7 November.[85]

Reconstruction

[edit]
Victory's 'new' figurehead fitted during her 1800-1803 repair.

On arrival at Chatham,Victory underwent an inspection that revealed the extensive weaknesses in the stern timbers and as a result she was removed from active service. In December 1798 she was refitted as ahospital ship for wounded French and Spanishprisoners of war, and moored in theMedway.[18][86] The Admiralty advocated for her full conversion to aprison hulk but reneged after theNavy Board advised that such a complex refitting would be all but permanent and thatVictory could never be reverted to a warship.[87]

The decision to reconditionVictory came after the 98-gunHMS Impregnable was wrecked on 8 October 1799. While returning from escort duty toLisbon,Impregnable ran aground near Portsmouth and after attempts to refloat had failed, was stripped and dismantled, leaving the Royal Navy short of a three-decked ship-of-the-line.[86] When the renovation started in 1800, it was thought the cost would not exceed £23,500 but this rose to £70,933 as the repairs became an extensive reconstruction.[86][87]

It was during this refit that her gun capacity was increased from 100 to 104 guns with the cutting of additional gun ports. The interior of herpowder magazine was sheathed in copper to reduce the risk of sparks and to protect against rodents. The open galleries along her stern were closed in, providing more usable cabin space and giving extra protection in rough weather.[88] Further weatherproofing was provided by the addition of high coamings around the lower hatchways while thechainwales were moved above the gun ports to prevent gun handling interfering with the rigging. A less ornatefigurehead was also fitted, the oversized original featured figures representing the four continents; Europe, Asia, Africa and America. The fighting tops, previously oak, were replaced with fir, in order to save weight and were manufactured in two pieces to facilitate easier removal.[89] She was also repainted from red to black and yellow. Initially the gun ports were yellow to match but these were later changed to black, giving a pattern later called the"Nelson chequer", which was adopted by most Royal Navy ships in the decade following the Battle of Trafalgar and is seen on the ship today.[90][91]A peace was negotiated in March 1802 but work continued unabated and within a year, relations with France had deteriorated to such a degree that the Admiralty orderedVictory to be made ready for sea with all haste.[92] The work was completed in April 1803, and the ship left for Portsmouth the following month under her new captain,Samuel Sutton.[18][93] She arrived at Spithead on 14 May, four days before war was declared.[92]

Napoleonic Wars

[edit]

Nelson and Trafalgar

[edit]
Main article:Trafalgar Campaign
Vice-Admiral Horatio Nelson flew his flag twice onVictory

Vice-Admiral Nelson hoisted his flag inVictory on 18 May 1803, with Samuel Sutton as hisflag captain.[18] However, the ship was not ready to sail until the afternoon of 20 May, when Nelson re-embarked andVictory put to sea in the company of the 32-gun frigateHMS Amphion.[94] Nelson's orders were to meet with Cornwallis off Brest, but after 24 hours of searching failed to find him. Nelson, anxious to reach the Mediterranean without delay, decided to transfer toAmphion off Ushant.[95]

On 28 May,Victory captured the 32-gun French frigateAmbuscade, bound forRochefort.[96] Reuniting with Nelson off Toulon, on 31 July, Sutton swapped ships with the captain ofAmphion,Thomas Masterman Hardy and Nelson raised his flag inVictory once more.[97]

While off the island of Toro, nearMajorca, on 4 April 1805, word was received from the 36-gunHMS Phoebe that the French fleet underPierre-Charles Villeneuve had left Toulon. Nelson, thinking it likely that the French were sailing for Egypt, set a course forSicily but Villeneuve was in fact intending to merge with the Spanish fleet atCádiz.[98] On 9 May, the 32-gunHMS Orpheus brought the news that the combined Franco-Spanish fleet of 17 ships had entered theAtlantic a month ago. The British fleet of ten ships-of-the-line and three frigates revictualled atLagos Bay, Portugal before sailing west on 11 May in pursuit.[99] On arrival in theWest Indies it was discovered that the Villeneuve had returned to Europe, where he was expected by French invasion forces atBoulogne-sur-Mer.[100]

The Franco-Spanish fleet had encountered Admiral Sir Robert Calder's squadron on 22 July and fought an indecisive action in the fog at theBattle of Cape Finisterre before seeking safety inVigo andFerrol.Admiral Cornwallis's Channel Fleet was joined off Ushant by Calder on 14 August and Nelson the day after.[101] The latter sailed home inVictory, leaving his remaining ships with Cornwallis[102] whose force now numbered thirty-three ships-of-the-line. Twenty of these were sent under Calder to hunt for the combined fleet, last seen at Ferrol. On 21 August news came that the enemy had arrived back at Cádiz where Lord Nelson joinedLord Collingwood on the 28 September.[103]

Battle of Trafalgar

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Trafalgar
The opening engagement at the Battle of Trafalgar, byJ.W. Carmichael (oil on canvas, 1856)

Villeneuve, on learning he was to be replaced in command, was galvanised into action, setting sail for the Mediterranean on 19 October.[104] At about 19:00 hours British frigates were spotted and the order was given to form line of battle.[105] The British fleet, aware of Villeneuve's presence was in the meantime on a parallel course some 10 miles away over the horizon and on the morning of 21 October, turned to intercept.[106] Nelson had already decided to break the enemy line in two places and destroy the middle and rear sections before the van could turn about and come to their aid.[107] At 06:00 hours, Nelson ordered his fleet into two columns.

First LieutenantJohn Quilliam had devised an emergency steering system forVictory, which he was able to bring to good effect at Trafalgar

Because of light winds it was six hours before the 100-gunRoyal Sovereign, leading the British lee column, was able to open fire onFougueux of 74 guns. Around 30 minutes later,Victory broke the line between the 80-gun French flagshipBucentaure and 74-gunRedoutable, and fired her guns at such close range that the flames from the ignited powder singed the windows of the French flagship before the shockwave and cannonballs arrived.Victory's port guns unleashed a devastating broadside, rakingBucentaure and blowing a huge hole in her side. The maelstrom of cannonballs and grapeshot dismounted the French ship's guns and killed and wounded between 300 and 450 of her 750 to 800 complement almost immediately, putting her out of action.[108][109][110] At 13:15, a musket ball entered Nelson's left shoulder and lodged in his spine.[111] The shot was fatal and he died at 16:30.[112] So much death had occurred onVictory's quarterdeck thatRedoutable's crew attempted to board. The action was checked by the timely intervention ofEliab Harvey in the 98-gunHMS Temeraire, unleashing a destructive broadside into the French ship.[113] Nelson's last order was for the fleet to anchor, but this was countermanded by Vice-Admiral Cuthbert Collingwood.[114]

Victory had been badly damaged in the battle and suffered 57 killed and 102 wounded.[115] Unable to move under her own power,HMS Neptune towed her to Gibraltar for repairs. On 4 November, with Nelson's body on board,Victory left for England under ajury rig but was in such poor condition and leaking so badly, she had to be taken in tow once more. Arriving at Portsmouth on 4 December, the ship underwent emergency repairs before continuing to Sheerness on 11 December. She did not reach her destination until 22 December however, having been delayed by strong winds.[116] Nelson was taken upriver toGreenwich in the port commissioner's yacht where he lay in state before his burial inSt. Paul's Cathedral on 9 January 1806.[116][117]

On 15 January,Victory paid off, with the majority of her crew being reassigned to the recently commissionedHMS Ocean of 98 guns.Victory's rigging, guns and stores were taken off while a preliminary inspection revealed the need for a dry dock. The necessity for aspring tide and other delays prevented this until 6 March when she was moved into number two dock at Chatham, where she had been built 47 years earlier.[118][119] After repairs to the hull,Victory was recoppered and rerigged with new masts and spars before being refloated on 3 May. She was after moored in the Medway where she was aired out and periodically inspected until 23 April 1807, when she was again dry docked for further repairs.[119][120]

Baltic service

[edit]

The Admiralty Board consideredVictory too old, and in too great a disrepair, to be restored as a first-rate.[121] To decrease the strain on her hull and in response to an Admiralty order issued in November 1807, the 68-pound carronades were replaced with 32-pounders, two of the 32-pounder cannon were removed altogether and all the 24-pound cannon replaced with 18-pounders, relegating her to second-rate in the process and cutting the number of crew required to operate her.[121][122] Her refit at Chatham also required her masts to be stepped on the lower deck rather than the keel; an initiative introduced in January to save timber.[123][124]

Painting by Edwin Williams of Vice-Admiral James Saumarez, who flew his flag aboardVictory during operations in the Baltic.

In 1808,Victory was brought back into service as the flagship of Vice-AdmiralSir James Saumarez, who had been ordered to take command of Royal Navy forces in the Baltic.[125] Samuel Hood, assisted by Rear-AdmiralSir Richard Keats, was already in the area operating a fleet of nine 74-gun and two 64-gun ships-of-the-line, five frigates, together with various bomb vessels, sloops and gunbrigs.[126] Since theTreaties of Tilsit, the Baltic fleet had mainly been concerned with convoy protection, the Russian invasion ofSwedish Finland and the threat of a second invasion of Sweden's territory from an army across theOresund in Denmark.[125][127] To deter such a move, a proposal to station 10,000 British troops inSkane was being brokered by SirJohn Moore. Negotiations with the King of Sweden,Gustav IV Adolf, went badly, the plan was rejected and Moore put under house arrest.[125]

On 18 March, Saumarez raised his flag onVictory, sailing for theNore on 1 April. There, on 16 April, he received his final orders before leaving for the Baltic on 30 April in the company of two gun brigs.[128]Victory eventually arrived at Gothenburg on 9 May having been further delayed by the weather.[129] During the evening of 29 June, whileVictory was anchored off the city, Saumarez hosted a ball for a few of its citizens. During the event, Moore arrived aboard, having escaped from captivity four days previous.[130] The following morning,Victory withdrew toVinga where Saumarez' main force was kept, and Moore transferred to the 74-gunHMS Audacious which was due to escort a convoy toYarmouth.[131]After arriving in England, Moore was sent to Portugal in July, where he took command of the British forces there.[132] After Moore's escape, Saumarez was freed of the need to remain in the Lieutenant-General's vicinity. Hitherto having only been able to send small squadrons under Hood or Keats, he was now able to move the bulk of his fleet into the Baltic Sea where he could aid the Swedes fighting in Finland and bring the Russian fleet to action if the chance occurred.[133]Victory's progress was slow, the winds were unfavourable and extra care had to be taken manoeuvring such a large ship in shallow waters. She eventually madethe Danish island of Mon on 25 July where she rendevouzed with Hood's ships.[134] Saumarez had a large subsidy on board that the British government had promised to the Swedish king, and on 31 July, sailed on to Stockholm.[135]

When Napoleon deposed the King of Spain in August and placed his brother on the throne there was widespread revolt. In Holstein, 12,000 Spanish troops underMarques de la Romana, refused to swear an oath of allegiance and appealed to the British for passage home.[135]Victory was atKarlskrona on 4 August, while Saumarez paid a visit to heads of the dockyard and dined with the officers there. Seven days later he received a communication from King Gustav requesting British ships be sent to participate in a combined operation off theHanko Peninsula, where theSwedish port was being held by the Russians.[136][137] While waiting to be resupplied, another letter arrived, from which Saumarez learned thatRomana's soldiers were awaiting evacuation and sailed instead to theLittle Belt strait.[136] A squadron under Keats had already begun the operation whenVictory arrived offFunen on 18 August. After welcoming Romana on board,Victory's boats were launched to assist with the ferrying of his troops. Keats had requisitioned 60 Danish sloops which, in addition to his own ships, provided sufficient space for the 12,000 Spanish soldiers, the last of whom boarded on 21 August.[136]

Victory withHMS Mars,Goliath both of 74 guns andAfrica of 64 guns, then set sail for Hanko. Saumarez received news en route, via a Swedish frigate encountered on 30 August, that the Russian fleet under AdmiralPyotr Khanykov was atRagervik; an Anglo-Swedish force under Hood andHenrik Johan Nauckhoff had chased them there, the two 74sHMS Centaur andImplacable destroying the Russian 74-gun ship,Vsevolod, in the process.[138] Saumarez' squadron arrived off the coast of Estonia at 14:00 where the ships of Hood and Nauckhoff had the Russians trapped in port. On 1 September, after boarding one of his smaller ships, an 18-gunsloop-of-war, for a close-up inspection of the enemy's position, Saumarez decided to test their defences by giving them a broadside fromVictory as she passed as near to the western shore as was prudent. The fire was returned by the batteries protecting the harbour.Bomb vessels were then employed in an attempt to either destroy the Russian ships or compel them to come out and fight but this failed in both respects and a plan to usefireships was rejected when it was discovered that a strong, well protected boom had been placed across the entrance.[138][139] The Anglo-Swedish force therefore had to be content with maintaining its blockade, which it did until the end of September, when the threat of being trapped by ice forced Saumarez to retreat to Karlskrona.[138][140] When theMars was sent to check on Khanykov's fleet on 4 November, the harbour was found empty. Saumarez then sailed his ships to Gothenburg, arriving on 28 October, where he received orders to return home. On 3 November,Victory,Implacable andCentaur escorted a large convoy to England, anchoring inThe Downs on 8 November.[141]

When Moore's troops were obliged to withdraw toCorunna towards the end of the year,Victory withVille de Paris and three 74-gun ships, escorted transports to the north-west of Spain for an evacuation. Uncertainty over the army's location meant that the rescue party was initially dispatched to Vigo where, on learning of the mistake, the transports had to be towed out of the harbour because of light winds. British troops were still engaging the enemy on the heights above the town whenVictory reached Corunna on the night of 14 January 1809, dropping anchor outside the port at 11:30 the following day.[142][143] On the afternoon of 16 January, the remnants of Moore's army entered the town and boat crews began taking them from the beach to the awaiting transports in the harbour. The construction of a French gun battery forced the British to move their ships further out but the last troops were embarked on the morning of 18 January and the convoy set sail for England. It arrived inCawsand Bay near Plymouth on 23 January andVictory was back in the Baltic by 8 May, when she dropped anchor off Gothenburg.[142]

DuringVictory's absence, acoup d'etat had taken place in Sweden. Begun in March, thecoup of 1809 culminated on 1 May with the deposition of King Gustav and his uncle,Charles XIII being appointedregent. Britain did not officially recognise the new regime but the alliance was maintained and the passage of trade through the Baltic continued under the protection of the Royal Navy; ships from England would gather at Vinga sound, whereVictory was mainly stationed, to be escorted through either the Oresund orGreat Belt, while ships from the other direction would assemble at Karlskrona.[144] Following the death of Charles in May 1810, Napoleon's cousin,Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte succeeded to the throne, automatically allying Sweden to France. Bernadotte however, was determined to act in the interests of Sweden and maintain the flow of trade, and Saumarez allowed him to cross the Oresund to his new realm unimpeded. Despite this cordial start, Sweden, under pressure from Napoleon, declared war on Britain on 17 November.[145]

When reinforcements were required by Wellington's army in theIberian Peninsula,Victory was withdrawn from the Baltic, converted to atroopship and used to convey soldiers to Lisbon.[143] She sailed for Portugal on 30 January 1811, with 717 personnel from the36th Regiment of Foot on board but was unable to make headway until 15 February when the wind changed to a more favourable direction. It remained fickle however, causing further delays and it was not until 2 March that the ship entered the Tagus.[146] On her return to Vinga on 2 May,Victory was visited, under a flag of truce, by Gothenburg's military commander. He assured Saumarez that the declaration of war had been a formality, there would be no hostile action and that the Swedish Government wished to remain on the best of terms with Britain. Nevertheless, Saumarez' ships were henceforth additionally employed in a blockade of the Swedish navy at Karlskrona.[143][147] In September, Saumarez received news of two Danish gunboats to the south, between Vinga andAnholt, waiting to ambush merchant ships bound for England. He immediately sent two ofVictory's boats in acutting out expedition. Despite having less than a fifth of the numbers, the British crew managed to board and capture both Danish vessels.[148] Towards the end of the year, Saumarez decided to sail his ships to England for much needed repairs rather than remain for the harsh winter when trade routes were closed due to ice. Bad weather at first prevented the withdrawal until 17 December and then hampered its progress. Several ships were lost on the journey including the 98-gunHMS St George and 74-gunHMS Defence.Victory, under a single reefed sail, crossed theNorth Sea by running before the wind until she was off the coast ofSuffolk on 24 December. She limped intoThe Solent two days later.[149] When she returned to Gothenburg on 3 May 1812, relations between France and Russia had soured and an official peace treaty with Sweden was impending. By the time Napoleon had begun hismarch on Moscow, there was no need for a large Royal Navy presence in the Baltic.[150]Victory returned home at the end of the year, arriving off Spithead on 7 November.[151]

Final years afloat

[edit]
HMSVictory moored in Portsmouth Harbour in 1884

Victory was later relocated to the mouth ofPortsmouth Harbour offGosport, for service as a floating depot and, from 1813 to 1817, as aprison ship, although she was neverhulked.[152][153] In March 1814, the ship was brought into dry dock for a major reconstruction and thus was not available for thehundred days conflict after Napoleon escaped from exile inElba.[154] The repairs included the fitting of metal braces to strengthen the frame. This was the earliest recorded use of iron for this purpose; nuts, bolts and nails had for some time been used to hold a ship's structure together but not to reinforce it.[155] Since 1803, when her stern galleries were closed in, her outward appearance had remained unchanged but during this refit herbeakhead andbulkhead were removed and the bow rounded off in line withRobert Seppings recommendations of 1811.[156] The diagonal bracing that Seppings would introduce as standard in 1817 was not carried out however.[157] She was repainted in black and white, the new norm for Royal Navy ships, and with only interior work left to do, the ship was taken out of dock in December 1815 and anchored in the harbour, where she was completed in January 1816.[154][156] An Admiralty decision to have all three-deckers as first-rate ships, meant that whenVictory was recalled to active service in February 1817, she was relisted as such and re-armed with 104 guns.[158] However, her hull remained in poor condition and in January 1822, she was placed in dry dock at Portsmouth so further repairs could be carried out. When she was refloated in January 1824, she was considered suitable only for use as thePort admiral's flagship. She remained in that role at Portsmouth Harbour until April 1830.[153]

In 1831 the Admiralty issued orders for the aging ship to bebroken up and her timbers reused in other vessels, but a public outcry prevented her destruction.[159] She instead became home to the Captain of Ordinary, whose responsibility was to look after all the ships that had been laid up, but in 1832 she was recommissioned as flagship to the port admiral once more.[158] From that point, the Admiralty began inviting civilian visitors to aboard for tours.[159] On 18 July 1833, the heir presumptive,Princess Victoria, and her mother, theDuchess of Kent, met veterans of the Trafalgar campaign on the quarterdeck.[152] This event generated a surge of interest in the vessel, and an annual growth in civilian visitors to between 10,000 and 12,000.[159] The port admiral moved his flag to the 120-gunHMS Britannia in August 1836 andVictory was without a role until August 1837, when she became flagship to the Admiral Superintendent of the Dockyard.[158]

After Victoria returned for a second time on 21 October 1844, the number of visitors swelled again to more than 22,000 a year.[159] In late April 1854,Victory sprang a leak and sank. All on board were rescued[160] and the ship was subsequently raised.[161] In 1847Victory was the flagship to theCommander-in-Chief, Portsmouth but the escalation in human traffic had caused her to become increasingly decrepit and she was docked again in 1857 for further repairs and recoppering.[158][159] She resumed her role on her return to service in 1858, but in 1869 the Commander-in-Chief's flag was transferred to the steam line of battle shipDuke of Wellington andVictory was designated hertender.[158]

Sir Edward Seymour visited the vessel in 1886 as flag captain to the Commander-in-Chief and recalled in his 1911 memoirs, "a more rotten ship than she had become probably never flew the pennant. I could literally run my walking stick through her sides in many places".[162] In 1887, the ship began leaking again and only with some difficulty was she prevented from sinking at her mooring.[159] This prompted the Admiralty to thereafter provide a small annual subsidy for maintenance.[162] That same year, the lower masts of the ship had become so rotten it was decided to replace them with the hollow, iron masts fromHMS Shah. They were fitted to the keel as her masts would have been prior to the 1807 refit.[163] In 1889Victory became the home of a signal school in addition to being a tender.[162]The school remained inVictory until 1904, when training was transferred temporarily toHMS Hercules.[164]

Despite her reuse as a school,Victory continued to deteriorate. In 1903 she was accidentally rammed by theiron-clad shipHMS Neptune, a successor to the vessel that had towed her to Gibraltar.Neptune had broken free of tugs that were towing her and struckVictory on the port side causing considerable damage.[165] Emergency repairs prevented her from sinking, but the Admiralty again proposed that she be scrapped, and it was only the personal intervention ofEdward VII that prevented this from occurring.[166] She was instead hastily patched up for the centenary celebration of the Battle of Trafalgar, which had caused a resurgence of interest in the ship.[167] For part of the 1905 festivities she was illuminated with electricity generated by an adjacent submarine.[166] Events were deliberately low key as the British Government did not wish to upset the French who were by then allies; theEntente Cordiale having been signed in 1904.[168] TheSociety for Nautical Research was formed in 1910 to campaign for the ship's preservation but was unable to secure the backing of the Admiralty, which was at that time being stripped of its assets by an escalating arms race. In 1911, Frank H. Mason'sThe Book of British Ships remarked how the dilapidated condition of theVictory was "nothing short of an insult".[169] Any plans for the ship were put on hold when theFirst World War broke out in August 1914, and she was left to deteriorate.[170]

In dry dock and restoration

[edit]

1921–1939

[edit]
Victory in dry dock with her rounded 'Sepping's' bow

The ship had degraded to such an extent by 1921 that a public campaign gathered momentum with the shipping magnate,Sir James Caird, donating generously to theSave the Victory fund.[171][172] On 16 December, her ballast was removed and she entered the No. 1 basin at Portsmouth Dockyard where it was discovered that she had hogged so badly that the bow and stern had dropped by 457 millimetres (18 in) and 203 millimetres (8 in) respectively, and that the scarph joints of the keelson had opened up by more than 25.5 millimetres (1 in).[167]Concerns about her ability to remain afloat led toVictory being dry docked indefinitely. Prolonged periods out of water puts tremendous strain on a ship and it was apparent that she would require a specially manufactured, steel frame to support her.[173]Victory was moved to No. 2 dock on 20 March 1922 where a survey revealed that 25 to 50 per cent of her internal fittings needed replacing and most of her furnishings, along with her entire steering system, had been removed or destroyed.[159][171][174]

Her relocation started a public debate as to where the ship might lie in the future. Contemporary newspapers included suggestions such as: placing her on a floating plinth, either in Portsmouth or adjacent to theRoyal Naval College, Greenwich, a berth on theThames next toCleopatra's Needle, or a land-based structure inTrafalgar Square. None of these options were seriously considered however; the ship was too damaged to be moved safely and the Admiralty elected to leave her in situ. No. 2 dock becameVictory's permanent home and is now the oldest dry dock in the world still in use.[159]

On 21 October 1922 the Admiral of the FleetSir Doveton Sturdee issued a further public plea for "many thousands of pounds" of public donations inThe Times. He wrote: "The value of the Victory is no transitory thing. She must be preserved in order that our children's children may draw from her the same inspiration that we have drawn ourselves, and our fathers before us."[175]

...and with her restored bulkhead and beakhead

On 8 April 1925,Victory was temporarily refloated within Portsmouth's No. 2 dock, to adjust the supporting cradle and so thatVictory's waterline would be at the same level with the top of the dry dock.[176] Sitting higher increased her exposure to the elements and greater force from the wind on her masts and rigging, a non-issue when the boat was afloat as water pressure and hull movement would accommodate this. Nevertheless, the adjustment went ahead, driven by some degree byKing George V who had visitedVictory in July three years previous. To negate the strain placed on the ship, 127 millimetres (5.0 in) diameter steel rods were passed through the keel and fixed to the concrete dock below and additional stays were fitted from the top of each mast to the dockside.[177] This last refloating ofVictory was recorded byPathé news cameras.[178][179]

The initial restoration, carried out between 1922 and 1929, was concerned with both the repair of rotten timbers and the return of the ship to her Trafalgar appearance.[180] The most obvious difference was the rounded bow, fitted in 1814,[156] which was demolished and replaced with a square beakhead and bulkhead.[180] An original skylight on the quarterdeck, taken away on the orders of Nelson, then put back in 1830, was once more removed and boarded over.[181] Fittings that had been modernised such as the pumps and steering system received age appropriate replacements, and a fire hearth and Brodie stove installed.[181] A number of the warrant officers' cabins had been disassembled during the ship's harbour service and these were reinstated along with their attendant store rooms, the hanging magazine, the pharmacy, sail rooms, cable tiers and bread store. The captain's and lieutenants' stores had also been removed and these too were re-built, as was the wardroom and senior lieutenants' cabins on the middle deck. Other rooms were renovated and painted, including the Great Cabin, the admiral's day and night cabins on the upper deck, and the captain's day and night cabins on the quarterdeck.[182] Repairs were mainly concerned with hull and in particular the area around the waterline. This timber had at times been submerged and at others allowed to dry, leading to cracks and rotting.[183] Several pillars were replaced on the orlop and lower deck in either oak or teak and some of the frames between the lower and middle deck needed attention. These were all repaired using oak. When it came to repairing the frames on the deck above however, a shortage of oak meant some were restored using fir.[184] The knees supporting the deck beams were checked and many had to be renewed but of the beams themselves, only one required replacement.[185] A plaque commemorating the end of the restoration was unveiled byKing George V in 1928 but repairs continued to be made, overseen by the Society for Nautical Research.[171]

Post-war restoration (1945–2005)

[edit]

Work was postponed during theSecond World War, and in 1941, more damage was incurred when a 500 lb. bomb[186] dropped by theLuftwaffe broke her keel, severely damaged one of the steel cradles and part of the foremast. When German radio falsely reported that the ship had been destroyed, the Admiralty was forced to issue a denial.[187] The problems caused by the explosion were not fully rectified until 1964.[188]

AlthoughVictory's main cause of disrepair was rot, there was a significant infestation ofdeathwatch beetle and the ship was fumigated in 1954, 1955 and 1956. Some of the bulkheads were also removed during this time to increase airflow. Over the next ten years much of the decayed oak was replaced with oily hardwoods such as teak andiroko, which were thought to be more resistant to fungus and pests.[189][190]

From 1964 further repairs were made to hull, mainly below the lower gundeck. This required the stripping of the copper sheathing outside and the removal of the carpenter's walk, the bulkhead of the carpenter's store and his cabin inside.[191] Work to permanently repair the bomb damage also began in this year.[192] By 1970 the starboard side of the hull had been completed, and work to the port side was finished by the end of the year.[193]

In 1973, repair work was halted to allow for refurbishment of the stern and in particular thecockpit, after concerns had been raised about the authenticity of work carried out in 1926.[192] Work on the stern necessitated the removal of all the glazing and the ornately carved mouldings that adorned the gallery rails.[194]

From 1978 to 1983, an annual smoke treatment was applied to the ship in an attempt to eradicate the wood-boring beetles but the population continued to rise. Having deduced that the insects were breeding in rotten timber, deep within the ship where the smoke could not penetrate, it was decided to concentrate on locating and removing those affected areas.[195] A process which was made easier in 1995 with the introduction of the Sibert drill. With a diameter of only 2 mm (0.079 in) it caused minimal damage, and with a length of 350 mm (14 in) it could penetrate deep into the timber to record its density.[196]

An aerial shot of Portsmouth Historic Dockyard with HMSVictory in the centre during Trafalgar 200 celebrations.

A survey carried out in 1980 found that the beakhead, reinstated in the 1920s, had started to rot. The starboard gangway, a beam supporting the quarterdeck and the steel cradle beneath the ship, also required attention. In order to fix the gangway, a temporary entrance had to be cut in the side towards the rear of the ship.[197] Repairs were put on hold in 1982 because the dockyard was a Royal Navy Fleet Maintenance Base and the country was at war. Restoration to the bow therefore, was not fully completed until 1990 when a newly carved figurehead was also fitted.[198] Just a year later however, the beakhead planking was found to have rotted. Laid in 1989 inDouglas fir the area had become infected withpenicillium spinulosum and was relaid in teak.[199] While renewing a beam on the middle gundeck in 1993, a carpenter's note was found which dated the last re-planking of the upperdeck to October 1886.[199]

During the 1990s, civilians began to replace Royal Navy personnel as guides aboardVictory. It was thought that those with a specific interest in the ship would bring greater expertise and enthusiasm to the role. Most were senior officers who had retired from the service. A curator was also appointed in 1991.[200]

Although the decision to returnVictory to her Trafalgar appearance had been made in 1920, the demand for constant repairs and maintenance caused many delays.[201] The restoration was eventually finished in 2005 in time forTrafalgar 200; a four-month long celebration which began in July with an international fleet review of more than 150 vessels from around the globe.[201][202] The festivities included exhibitions and celebration dinners atPortsmouth Historic Dockyard,Victory's birthplace atChatham Historic Dockyard,[203] and theNational Maritime Museum inGreenwich, and culminated on 23 October with a church service atSt Paul's Cathedral, attended by theBritain's royal family.[202]

Victory's shot damaged sails were replaced after Trafalgar but her foretopsail survived. First displayed at the Royal Naval Exhibition of 1891, it was lost but later discovered in theRoyal Navy barracks at Portsmouth. Extensively damaged by more than 90 cannonballs, it is now kept and cared for at theRoyal Naval Museum. Although it is not normally on display, it is brought out for special events such as the 1998Festival of the Sea and Trafalgar 200.[202][204]

'The Big Repair' (2005–present)

[edit]

In August 2011, a team of riggers and cranes dismantled the upper masts and rigging of HMSVictory in order to reduce stress on the ship's hull. This was the first time the top masts had been struck since the Second World War. In December,Defence Equipment and Support awarded an initial five-year project management contract toBAE Systems, with an option to extend to ten years. The restoration is worth £16 million over the life of the contract and will include work to the masts and rigging, replacement side planking, and the addition of fire control measures. It is expected to be the most extensive refit since the ship returned from Trafalgar.[205]

HMSVictory dock walkway, opened in August 2020

AsVictory is a Royal Navy ship, the Board of the Admiralty has always accepted responsibility for maintaining her as such but the cost of restoring her to Trafalgar condition has been met by donations.[172][206] Although theMinistry of Defence retains overall control, since 5 March 2012, responsibility for management of the ship has passed to a dedicated HMSVictory Preservation Trust, established as part of theNational Museum of the Royal Navy which includes the Submarine Museum atGosport, the Royal Marines Museum onPortsea Island and the Fleet Air Arm Museum inYeovil.[200][207] This action has allowed for external fundraising and a donation of £25 million was immediately secured from SirDonald Gosling which was then matched by the Government.[200][208]

Victory underwent a major restoration in 2017, it was discovered that the hull had been moving at a rate of half a centimetre each year, for a total of around 20 cm since the 1970s. To combat this, a new support system was installed over a period of three years from 2018 to 2021. The original steel cradle was replaced with 134 individually adjustable steel props, fitted with monitoring equipment. This allows for constant accurate reading of the stresses and more precise application of support.[209][210] During this work a new walkway was constructed to enable visitors to explore the ship below the waterline. It opened to the public in August 2020.[211]

The lower mainmast ofVictory was removed in 2021 for conservation which was the beginning of a major set of works to construct a large scaffold over the ship to allow for hull replanking over the next decade.[212] The scaffold allows shipwrights access to the ship's hull to remove and replace the existing planking installed between the 1980s and 2000s. It also includes a visitor walkway on multiple levels to allow visitors to see the work being undertaken by the Museum's shipwrights.[213]

A new restoration phase begun in 2022 and due to be completed in 2032, aims to conclude the planking of the hull and to continue the battle against the beetle that has caused so many problems since its discovery in 1932.[214]Cranfield University is studying the insect in order to better understand its behaviour, particularly in relation to its wood-boring activity. The beetle's genome has also been sequenced by theSanger Institute so better pesticides or alternative methods of control can be developed.[215][216] The ten-year initiative is expected to cost £42 million.[214] This latest restoration is being recorded in meticulous detail and over 3000 high resolution photographs have been taken thus far. The images will be used to build a three-dimensional model of the ship.[217]

Victory is the world's oldest commissioned warship and has served as the flagship of the First Sea Lord since October 2012.[3][218] Part of thenation's Historic Fleet, she also fulfils a role as a museum ship, attracting around 350,000 visitors a year.[219][220][221]

Culture

[edit]

The ship occupies a special place in the British psyche and is considered a potent symbol of the Royal Navy.[222][223][224][225] A First Lord of the Admiralty,Leo Amery, once said thatVictory embodied "...in a quite unique degree the history and tradition of British sea power ... the central shrine of our great naval tradition" while during the Naval Review of 1924,King George V declared "...that the country possessed no better stimulus to patriotic self-sacrifice than the flagship of Nelson".[226] She has been a destination for royalty and heads of state includingKaiser Wilhelm II, who with his wife, the Kaiserin, made a state visit to Britain in 1889. The Kaiser was presented with a desk fashioned byWaring and Gillow from timber that once formed part ofVictory.[227] He would later, on 1 August 1914, sign an order on the desk, that would start theFirst World War.[228] While serving as thePrime Minister,Winston Churchill embarked the ship in 1941 following an air raid on Portsmouth during the nights of 10 and 11 January.[229]

In 1889, it was planned to towVictory toGreenwich for the Royal Navy exhibition, featuring a display of more than 5,000 nautical objects. When the venue was changed toChelsea, the large number of low bridges made this an almost impossible task, and instead a full-size model of the ship was constructed.[230] When the exhibition was over, the replica was sold and rebuilt at its new home on theIsle of Man.[227]

Victory has featured in and provided inspiration for several films: The fictional Royal Navy ship HMSDauntless in the 2003Disney filmPirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl was based on her,[231] while the Great Cabin stood in forHMS Bellerophon in the 2023 biopicNapoleon, in a fictitious scene depicting a meeting between Napoleon and theDuke of Wellington.[232] She is used as a basis for the ship of the line in the opening song "Look Down" in the 2012 film adaptation ofLes Misérables, which was filmed in HMNB Portsmouth.[233] and a few glimpses of the ship, still afloat in 1918, are to be seen towards the end of Maurice Elvey's biopic of Nelson created in that year.[234]Persuasion, a 1995period drama by theBBC and based onJane Austen's 1817novel of the same name, featured scenes aboardVictory and her cutter.[202] For the filmMaster and Commander: The Far Side of the World the production team worked withVictory's curators to help accurately depict life aboard during the Georgian era, whileRussell Crowe, who portrayedJack Aubrey in the film, boarded the ship to garner inspiration for his role.[235][236]W. S. Gilbert visited the ship in 1868 while researching his operettaHMS Pinafore.[237]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^USS Constitution is 30 years younger. She is often referred to as the "oldest commissioned warship stillafloat" because she is maintained in sailing trim;Victory is kept in dry dock.[3]
  2. ^The strongest wind in which a ship can safely carry hertopgallant sails;[31] Equivalent to force 6-7 on theBeaufort Scale.[32]
  3. ^The gun-rating of a vessel was the number of long guns it was designed to carry and did not always match its actual armament. Before 1817, carronades were not counted at all unless they were direct replacements for long guns.[35][36]
  4. ^Many flag officers of note, includingSamuel Hood,Richard Howe andJohn Jervis preferred the heavier gun.[38]
  5. ^A temporary rank between admiral and captain, the first captain functioned mainly aschief of staff. He was senior to all other captains under the command of the admiral and was afforded the rights, pay and privileges of a rear admiral (the least senior of the rank). Because of this, it was not unusual for a high-ranking admiral to assign a rear admiral to the position. On the appointment of a first captain, the captain of the flagship (flag captain) would be designated second captain.[41]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Lavery (1983) p. 175
  2. ^abGoodwin (2004) p. 12
  3. ^abEastland and Ballantyne (2011) p. 9
  4. ^Mckay (2000) p. 9
  5. ^Eastland & Ballantyne (2011) p. 13
  6. ^McGowan (2003) p. 3
  7. ^Dull (2008) p. 1
  8. ^Konstam (2009) pp. 4-6
  9. ^Christopher (2010) pp. 15 & 16
  10. ^McGowan (2003) p. 10
  11. ^Christopher (2010) pp. 17 & 20
  12. ^Stilwell (2005) p. 145
  13. ^Rasor, Eugene L. (2004).English/British Naval History to 1815: A Guide to the Literature. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 129.ISBN 9780313305474.
  14. ^Christopher (2010) p. 19
  15. ^Goodwin (2004) p. 21
  16. ^Eastland and Ballantyne (2011), p. 39
  17. ^ab"Facts & Figures". HMS Victory. Archived fromthe original on 1 May 2012. Retrieved27 April 2012.
  18. ^abcdefghiWinfield (2007) p. 6
  19. ^abcEastland and Ballantyne (2011) p. 17
  20. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 10-11
  21. ^Eastland & Ballantyne (2011) pp. 15 & 16
  22. ^Christopher (2010) pp. 20–21
  23. ^Christopher (2010) p. 21
  24. ^Christopher (2010) p. 16
  25. ^Kennedy, Maev (22 February 2015)."How HMSVictory nearly never made it to the Battle of Trafalgar".The Guardian. Retrieved22 February 2015.
  26. ^Eastland and Ballantyne (2011), pp. 40–42
  27. ^Christopher (2010) p. 20
  28. ^abcdLavery (2015) p. 51
  29. ^Goodwin (2015) p. 68
  30. ^abGoodwin (2015) p. 148
  31. ^Falconer and Burney p. 163
  32. ^Royal Meteorological Society p. 41
  33. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 16-17
  34. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 16
  35. ^Davies p.24
  36. ^Ireland p.42
  37. ^abcGoodwin (2015) p. 92
  38. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 17
  39. ^McGowan (2003) p. 18
  40. ^"Armament". HMS-Victory. Archived fromthe original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved1 October 2013.
  41. ^Blake and Lawrence (1999) p. 79
  42. ^Dull (2009) p. 101
  43. ^Rodger (2005) pp. 336–337
  44. ^abcChristopher (2010) p. 38
  45. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 59-61
  46. ^Lavery (2015) p. 61
  47. ^abLavery (2015) p. 62
  48. ^Goodwin (2015) p. 25
  49. ^abcChristopher (2010) p. 42
  50. ^Sayer (1862) p. 398
  51. ^abLavery (2015) p. 66
  52. ^Sayer (1862) p. 400
  53. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 66-67
  54. ^Wharton, Capt. W. J. L.A short history of HMSVictory pp. 12–15. Griffin & Co, 1884
  55. ^abLavery (2015) p. 67
  56. ^abLavery (2015) p. 68
  57. ^Dull (2009) p. 120
  58. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 70-71
  59. ^Clowes (1997) p. 204
  60. ^Clowes (1997) p. 243
  61. ^Lavery (2015) p. 83
  62. ^Lavery (2015) p. 84
  63. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 84-86
  64. ^Lavery (2015) p. 86
  65. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 86-87
  66. ^Lavery (2015) p. 88
  67. ^abcdLavery (2015) p. 89
  68. ^James (Vol. I) p. 268
  69. ^James (Vol. I) pp. 268-269
  70. ^abcWillis (2013) p. 91
  71. ^Clowes (Vol. IV) p. 200
  72. ^Wilson (2013) p. 399
  73. ^Willis (2013) p. 90
  74. ^Clowes (Vol. IV) p. 305
  75. ^Vincent (2003) p. 180
  76. ^Willis (2013) p. 102
  77. ^Eastland & Ballantyne (2011) p. 19
  78. ^Willis (2013) pp. 102–103
  79. ^Eastland & Ballantyne (2011) pp. 19–20
  80. ^Willis (2013) pp. 92–93
  81. ^abcEastland & Ballantyne (2011) p. 20
  82. ^Willis (2013) pp. 104, 105, 109
  83. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 96-97
  84. ^Lavery (2015) p. 97
  85. ^Lavery (2015) p. 98
  86. ^abcChristopher (2010) p. 43
  87. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 20
  88. ^Goodwin, Peter (1998). "The Influence of Iron in Ship Construction: 1660 to 1830".The Mariner's Mirror.84 (1). Portsmouth, United Kingdom: Society for Nautical Research: 35.doi:10.1080/00253359.1998.10656674.
  89. ^McGowan (2003) pp.20-21
  90. ^Christopher (2010) pp. 43–44
  91. ^Goodwin, Peter G. (2013). "The Application and Scheme of Paintworks in British Men-of-War in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries".The Mariner's Mirror.99 (3). Portsmouth, United Kingdom: Society for Nautical Research: 291.doi:10.1080/00253359.2013.815993.S2CID 162165859.
  92. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 21
  93. ^Christopher (2010) p. 85
  94. ^Harris (1846) pp. 67-68
  95. ^Harris (1846) pp.71-72
  96. ^Winfield (2005) p. 194
  97. ^Stilwell (2005) p. 149
  98. ^Best (2005) pp. 109–110
  99. ^Best (2005) pp. 115–116
  100. ^Best (2005) p. 121
  101. ^Best (2005) pp. 143–144
  102. ^Best (2005) p. 144
  103. ^Best (2005) pp. 169–170
  104. ^Best (2005) pp. 189 & 192
  105. ^Best (2005) p. 199
  106. ^Best (2005) p. 206
  107. ^Best (2005) p. 154
  108. ^Napoleonic Wars: Battle of Trafalgar 1805 Documentary, 5 November 2017, retrieved4 April 2022
  109. ^HMS Victory – The Original Fast Battleship, 3 July 2019, retrieved4 April 2022
  110. ^Stilwell (2005) pp. 178–179
  111. ^Stilwell (2005) p.181
  112. ^Best (2005) p. 285
  113. ^Warwick.Voices from the Battle of Trafalgar. pp. 200–201.
  114. ^Best (2005) p. 295
  115. ^Stilwell (2005) p. 159
  116. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 22
  117. ^Christopher (2010) pp. 99–104
  118. ^Goodwin (2004) p. 81
  119. ^abLavery (2015) p. 147
  120. ^McGowan (2003) p. 24
  121. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 25
  122. ^Lavery (2015) p. 148
  123. ^Goodwin (2015) p. 23
  124. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 24-25
  125. ^abcLavery (2015) p. 151
  126. ^Clowes (Vol. V) p. 247
  127. ^Woodman (1998) p. 124
  128. ^Sullivan (2017) pp. 153-155
  129. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 151-152
  130. ^Sullivan (2017) p. 156
  131. ^Sullivan (2017) pp. 156-158
  132. ^"Moore, Sir John" .Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 18 (11th ed.). 1910. p. 809.
  133. ^Sullivan (2017) p. 158
  134. ^Sullivan (2017) p. 159
  135. ^abSullivan (2017) p. 160
  136. ^abcSullivan (2017) p. 161
  137. ^Clowes (Vol.V) p. 248
  138. ^abcSullivan (2017) p. 163
  139. ^Clowes (Vol. V) p. 250
  140. ^Goodwin (2015) pp. 23-24
  141. ^Sullivan (2017) pp. 168-169
  142. ^abLavery (2015) p.152
  143. ^abcGoodwin (2015) p. 24
  144. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 153-154
  145. ^Lavery (2015) p. 154
  146. ^Lavery (2015) p. 155
  147. ^Lavery (2015) pp.154-155
  148. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 155-156
  149. ^Lavery (2015) p. 156
  150. ^Lavery (2015) p. 157
  151. ^McGowan (2003) p. 27
  152. ^abChristopher (2010) p. 107
  153. ^abWinfield (2010), pp. 67–68
  154. ^abLavery (2015) p. 158
  155. ^Goodwin, Peter (1998). "The Influence of Iron in Ship Construction: 1660 to 1830".The Mariner's Mirror.84 (1). Portsmouth, United Kingdom: Society for Nautical Research:33–34.doi:10.1080/00253359.1998.10656674.
  156. ^abcMcGowan (2003) pp. 27-28
  157. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 157-158
  158. ^abcdeMcGowan (2003) p. 29
  159. ^abcdefghAberg, Alan (2005). "Saving the Victory".The Mariner's Mirror.91 (2). Portsmouth, United Kingdom: Society for Nautical Research:359–361.doi:10.1080/00253359.2005.10656955.S2CID 162312253.
  160. ^"Multum in Parvo".Liverpool Mercury etc. No. 2582. Liverpool. 2 May 1854.
  161. ^"HMS Victory (1765)".Naval Theater. Archived from the original on 27 June 2022. Retrieved23 July 2023.
  162. ^abcSeymour (1911) p. 249.
  163. ^McGowan (2003) p. 81
  164. ^"The First Signal Schools". Royal Naval Communications Association. Archived fromthe original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved5 October 2013.
  165. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 29-30
  166. ^abChristopher (2010) p. 111
  167. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 30
  168. ^Lavery (2005) p. 176
  169. ^Christopher (2010) pp. 112-113
  170. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 178-179
  171. ^abcChristopher (2010) p. 114
  172. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 33
  173. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 30-31
  174. ^Sarton, George (1946), "Floating Docks in the Sixteenth Century", Isis 36 (3/4): 153–154
  175. ^"We must preserve HMS Victory, the vessel that saved Britain from invasion".The Times. Retrieved21 October 2022.
  176. ^"'The Nelson Touch': Restoring HMS 'Victory', 1805-1925". National Maritime Museum. 2025. Retrieved1 July 2025.
  177. ^McGowan (2003) p. 31
  178. ^British Pathé (13 April 2014)."Nelson's Famous Flagship (1925)".YouTube.Archived from the original on 30 October 2021. Retrieved1 September 2021.
  179. ^British Pathé (15 October 2020)."Raising HMS Victory in dry dock (1925)".YouTube.Archived from the original on 30 October 2021. Retrieved1 September 2021.
  180. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 34
  181. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 35
  182. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 35-36
  183. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 36-37
  184. ^McGowan (2003) p. 37
  185. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 37 & 39
  186. ^"How Lord Nelson's HMS Victory has been kept ship-shape".BBC News. December 2011. Retrieved1 July 2025.
  187. ^Christopher (2010) pp. 114–115
  188. ^McGowan (2003) p. 44
  189. ^Christopher (2010) p. 115
  190. ^McGowan (2003) p. 39
  191. ^McGowan (2003) p. 45
  192. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 46
  193. ^McGowan (2003) p. 48
  194. ^McGowan (2003) p. 53
  195. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 101-102
  196. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 96-97
  197. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 65-66
  198. ^McGowan (2003) pp. 61 & 64
  199. ^abMcGowan (2003) p. 69
  200. ^abcLavery (2015) p. 197
  201. ^abDavid Prudames (1 July 2004)."HMS Victory's Reconstructed Grand Magazine Is Unveiled". Culture 24. Retrieved5 November 2013.
  202. ^abcdLavery (2015) p. 198
  203. ^"Trafalgar: the big bash".www.thetimes.com. 29 May 2005. Retrieved27 July 2025.
  204. ^"Trafalgar Sail". Portsmouth Historic Dockyard. Archived fromthe original on 16 October 2013. Retrieved15 October 2013.
  205. ^"HMS Victory £16m restoration begins at Portsmouth Dockyard". BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight. 12 December 2011. Retrieved15 April 2025.
  206. ^Lavery (2015) p. 182
  207. ^"Heritage – HMS Victory". Royal Navy. Retrieved28 December 2015.
  208. ^"£50million boost for HMS Victory". Fleet Air Arm Officers' Association. 2012. Retrieved28 December 2015.
  209. ^"HMS Victory Is Sagging Under Its Own Weight".www.forces.net. 21 August 2017. Retrieved9 November 2020.
  210. ^HMS Victory Safely Berthed, 30 April 2021, archived fromthe original on 30 October 2021, retrieved15 October 2021
  211. ^"Walkway Allows New Access to HMS Victory". Military History Matters. 14 September 2020. Retrieved26 January 2025.
  212. ^"HMS Victory's lower mast removed for first time since 1894".BBC News. 15 May 2021. Retrieved15 October 2021.
  213. ^"HMS Victory: The Big Repair Information Hub | National Museum of the Royal Navy".www.nmrn.org.uk. Retrieved30 July 2024.
  214. ^ab"HMS Victory shortlised best conservation project". National Museum of the Royal Navy. 3 April 2025. Retrieved14 April 2025.
  215. ^"Researching Deathwatch Beetle aboard HMS Victory". National Museum of the Royal Navy. 4 December 2023. Retrieved14 April 2025.
  216. ^"HMS Victory: The Big Repair Milestones - September 2024". National Museum of the Royal Navy. 2025. Retrieved14 April 2025.
  217. ^"Archaeology meets AI in ground-breaking collaboration between The National Museum of the Royal Navy and the University of Southampton". National Museum of the Royal Navy. 2 February 2024. Retrieved16 April 2025.
  218. ^"HMS Victory handed to First Sea Lord in Portsmouth". BBC News. 10 October 2012. Retrieved12 October 2012.
  219. ^"MUSEUM: HMS Victory welcomes 25 millionth visitor".Ships Monthly. 2024. Retrieved17 August 2025.
  220. ^"Appendix B – Historic fleet core collection"(PDF).First Annual Report April 2006 – March 2007. National Historic Ships Register. p. 46. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 5 September 2012. Retrieved7 November 2013.
  221. ^"Victory welcomes 25 millionth visitor". Southern Daily Echo. 15 October 2013. Retrieved15 October 2013.
  222. ^Eastland and Ballantyne (2011) p. 6
  223. ^McGowan (2003) p. vii
  224. ^Lavery (2015) p. 6
  225. ^Goodwin (2015) p. 4
  226. ^Don Legget (March 2017)."Restoring Victory: Naval Heritage, Identity, and Memory in Interwar Britain".Modern British History.28 (1). Oxford Academic:57–82.doi:10.1093/tcbh/hww060.PMID 28922799. Retrieved16 April 2025.
  227. ^abLavery (2015) p. 174
  228. ^Lavery (2015) p. 178
  229. ^"Churchill (Winston)". Bonhams. 2014. Retrieved16 April 2025.
  230. ^Lavery (2015) pp. 173 - 174
  231. ^Singer, Michael (2007).Bring Me That Horizon: The Making of Pirates of the Caribbean. Disney Editions. p. 101.ISBN 978-1423103196.
  232. ^"Trafalgar Day 2024: The Battle of Trafalgar". The National Museum of the Royal Navy. 22 October 2024. Retrieved16 April 2025.
  233. ^"Les Miserables costumes go on show". BBC - Hampshire and Isle of Wight. 4 April 2013. Retrieved16 April 2025.
  234. ^"England's Immortal Hero". Retrieved21 April 2018.
  235. ^"HMS Victory's battle-scarred sail goes on display". ITV News. 26 September 2018. Retrieved16 April 2025.
  236. ^Quintin Colville and James Davey, ed. (2013).Nelson - Navy and Nation. London: National Maritime Museum/Conway Publishing. p. 228.ISBN 9781844862078.
  237. ^Lavery (2015) p. 177

Sources

[edit]
  • Best, Nicholas (2005).Trafalgar – The Untold Story of the Greatest Sea Battle in History. London: The Orion Publishing Group Ltd.ISBN 0-297-84622-1.
  • Christopher, John (2010).The HMS Victory Story. Stroud: The History Press.ISBN 978-0-7524-5605-8.
  • Clowes, William Laird (1997) [1900].The Royal Navy, A History from the Earliest Times to 1900. Vol. IV. London: Chatham Publishing.ISBN 1-86176-013-2.
  • Clowes, William Laird (1997) [1900].The Royal Navy, A History from the Earliest Times to 1900. Vol. V. London: Chatham Publishing.ISBN 1-86176-014-0.
  • Davies, David (1996).Fighting Ships. Fulham Palace Road, London: Constable and Robinson Limited.ISBN 1-84119-469-7.
  • Dull, Jonathan R. (2009).The Age of the Ship of the Line. Barnsley: Seaforth Publishing.ISBN 978-1-84832-549-4.
  • Eastland, Jonathan; Ballantyne, Iain (2011).HMS Victory – First Rate 1765. Barnsley: Seaforth Publishing, Pen and Sword Books.ISBN 978-1-84832-094-9.
  • Ireland, Bernard (2000).Naval Warfare in the Age of Sail. Hammersmith, London: Harper Collins Publishing.ISBN 0-00-762906-0.
  • Falconer, William; Burney, William (1830).A New and Universal Dictionary of the Marine; being a copious explanation of the technical terms and phrases usually employed in the construction, equipment, machinery, movements, and military, as well as naval operations of ships: with such parts of astronomy and navigation as will be found useful to practical navigators. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies.OCLC 1752876.
  • Goodwin, Peter (2004).Nelson's Victory – 101 Questions & Answers about HMS Victory. London: Conway.ISBN 9-780851-779881.
  • Goodwin, Peter (2015).HMS Victory – Pocket Manual 1805. London: Conway.ISBN 978-1-84486-260-3.
  • Harris, Nicholas (1846).The Dispatches and Letters of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Nelson, with notes (Volume V). London: H. Colburn.OCLC 1043045198.
  • Konstam, Angus (2009).British Napoleonic Ship-of-the-Line. Botley, Oxford.: Osprey Publishing.ISBN 978-1-84176-308-8.
  • Lavery, Brian (1983).The Ship of the Line. Vol. 1: The development of the battlefleet 1650–1850. London: Conway Maritime Press.ISBN 0-85177-252-8.
  • Lavery, Brian (2015).Nelson's Victory – 250 Years of War and Peace. London: Seaforth Publishing.ISBN 978-1-84832-232-5.
  • Longridge, Charles N. (1981).The Anatomy of Nelson's Ships. Naval Institute Press.ISBN 0-87021-077-7.
  • McGowan, Alan (2003).HMS Victory: Her Construction, Career and Restoration. London: Caxton Editions.ISBN 1-84067-532-2.
  • McKay, John (2000).The 100-Gun Ship Victory. Anova Books Ltd.ISBN 978-1-84486-223-8.
  • Rodger, N.A.M (2005).The Command of the Ocean. London: Penguin Books.ISBN 0-14-028896-1.
  • Sayer, Capt. Frederick (1862).The History of Gibraltar and of its Political Relation to Events in Europe. London: Saunders, Otley & Co.OCLC 433276515.
  • Seymour, Sir Edward H. (1911).My Naval Career and Travels. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
  • Stilwell, Alexander (2005).The Trafalgar Companion. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.ISBN 1-84176-835-9.
  • Sullivan, Anthony (2017).Man of War: The Fighting Life of Admiral James Saumarez. Barnsley: Frontline.ISBN 978-1-52670-651-5.
  • Vincent, Edgar (2003).Nelson: Love & Fame. London: Yale University Press.ISBN 0-300-10260-7.
  • Warwick, Peter (September 2005).Voices from the Battle of Trafalgar. David & Charles.ISBN 0-7153-2000-9.
  • Willis, Sam (2013).In the Hour of Victory – The Royal Navy at War in the Age of Nelson. London: Atlantic Books Ltd.ISBN 978-0-85789-570-7.
  • Wilson, Ben (2013).Empire of the Deep. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.ISBN 978-0-297-86408-0.
  • Winfield, Rif (2007).British Warships in the Age of Sail 1714–1792: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates. Seaforth Publishing.ISBN 978-1-84415-700-6.
  • Winfield, Rif (2005).British Warships in the Age of Sail 1793–1817: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates. Seaforth Publishing.ISBN 978-1-84415-717-4.
  • Winfield, Rif (2010).First Rate: The Greatest Warships of the Age of Sail. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN 978-1-59114-264-5.
  • Woodman, Richard (1998).The Victory of Seapower. London: Caxton Editions.ISBN 184067-3591.
  • A Committee of the Council, ed. (2022) [1885].Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Vol. XI. London: Edward Stanfod.ISBN 9780282699567.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toHMS Victory (ship, 1765).
Aircraft carriers
Queen Elizabeth class
Submarines
Vanguard class
Astute class
Destroyers
Type 45
Frigates
Type 23
Amphibious
warfare ships
Albion-classLPD
Mine counter
measures vessels
Sandown class
Hunt class
Command and support
Patrol vessels
Ice patrol vessel
River class
Archer class
Cutlass class
Survey vessels
Ocean survey vessel
Survey launch
Miscellaneous
Ship of the line
  • Victory (flagship of the First Sea Lord)
Ancient ships
Medieval and modern
oar-powered ships
Wind-powered only
Steam-powered
Immobile
Other
Shipwrecks
Other incidents
Sailing ships
Steamships
Motor vessels
Canal vessels
Lifeboats
Lightships
Warships
Vessels of the
National Historic Fleet
Vessels listed on the
National Archive
of Historic Vessels
Overseas Watch List
Disposed vessels
operational preserved
Pre-1800
1800–1879
1880–1899
1900–1907
1908–1914
World War I
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Victory&oldid=1335870092"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp