| HF-24 Marut | |
|---|---|
%2c_HF-24%2c_Marut_(7585415088).jpg) | |
| General information | |
| Type | Fighter-bomber |
| National origin | India |
| Manufacturer | Hindustan Aeronautics Limited |
| Designer | |
| Primary user | Indian Air Force |
| Number built | 147[1] |
| History | |
| Introduction date | 1 April 1967 |
| First flight | 17 June 1961 |
| Retired | 1990 |
TheHAL HF-24 Marut ("Spirit of the Tempest") is an Indian jetfighteraircraft developed and manufactured byHindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) during the 1960s and early 70s. The Marut was designed by the German aeronautical engineerKurt Tank, with the Project Engineer being George William Benjamin. The aircraft was the first Indian-developed jet fighter. On 17 June 1961, the type conducted itsmaiden flight; on 1 April 1967, the first production Marut was officially delivered to the IAF.
While the Marut had been envisioned as asupersonic-capableinterceptor aircraft, it would never manage to exceedMach 1. This limitation was principally due to the engines used, which in turn had been limited by various political and economic factors; multiple attempts to develop improved engines or to source alternative powerplants were fruitless.
The Marut's cost and lack of capability in comparison to contemporary aircraft were often criticised. Nevertheless, the Marut performed relatively well in combat, primarily as afighter-bomber in the ground attack role. Most notably participating in theBattle of Longewala during theIndo-Pakistani war of 1971.
A total of 147 Maruts were manufactured, with theIndian Air Force (IAF) being the sole operator. By 1982, the Marut was becoming increasingly obsolescent, and was gradually phased out during the late 1980s.
During the 1950s, Hindustan Aircraft Limited (HAL) had developed and produced several types of trainer aircraft, such as theHAL HT-2. However, elements within the firm were eager to expand into the then-new realm of supersonic fighter aircraft.[2] Around the same time, the Indian government was in the process of formulating a new Air Staff Requirement for a Mach 2-capable combat aircraft to equip the Indian Air Force (IAF).[3] However, as HAL lacked the necessary experience in both developing and manufacturing frontline combat fighters, it was clear that external guidance would be invaluable; this assistance was embodied byKurt Tank.[4]
In 1956, HAL formally began design work on the supersonic fighter project.[5][2] The Indian government, led byJawaharlal Nehru, authorised the development of the aircraft, stating that it would aid in the development of a modern aircraft industry in India.[6] The first phase of the project sought to develop an airframe suitable for travelling at supersonic speeds, and able to effectively perform combat missions as a fighter aircraft, while the second phase sought to domestically design and produce an engine capable of propelling the aircraft.[5] Early on, there was an explicit adherence to satisfying the IAF's requirements for a capable fighter bomber; attributes such as a twin-engine configuration and a speed of Mach 1.4 to 1.5 were quickly emphasised.[5]
During development, HAL designed and constructed a full-scale two-seat wooden glider to act as a flying demonstrator. DesignatedHAL X-241, this replicated production aircraft in terms of dimensions, control configuration, and aerofoil sections. The wheel brakes, air brakes, flaps, and retractable undercarriage were all actuated using compressed gas, with sufficient gas storage aboard for multiple actuations per flight.[7] On 3 April 1959, the X-241 flew for the first time, after being towed into the air by aDouglas Dakota Mk.IV (BJ 449). A total of 86 flights were conducted prior to the X-241 sustaining considerable damage in a landing incident, when the nose undercarriage failed to extend.[7][8]
On 24 June 1961, the prototype Marut conducted its first powered flight.[3][8] It was fitted with the same UK-manufacturedBristol Siddeley Orpheus 703turbojets that were installed in theFolland Gnat airframes that were already being manufactured, under license, by HAL. While the Marut had been designed around significantly more powerful engines, theun-reheated Orpheus 703 was a viable powerplant for testing purposes. This meant that the Marut was barely capable of Mach 1, even though a top speed of Mach 2 had originally been considered necessary.[3][9] Before suitable, afterburning engines had been obtained, the Indian Government decided to order 16 pre-production and 60 production Maruts,[8] powered by the Orpheus 703.
The IAF was reluctant to operate a fighter aircraft with performance that was, at best, marginally better than its existing fleet of British-builtHawker Hunters. Due to the insufficient power of the Orpheus 703, the Marut was technically obsolete by the time the first production aircraft were completed, in 1964.[3][10]
On 1 April 1967, the first production Marut was officially accepted by the IAF.[8] Only 147 aircraft, including 18 two-seat trainers, were completed out of a planned 214.[3]
Following thefirst nuclear weapons tests by India, in 1974, adverse international public opinion worsened the chances of HAL obtaining better engines for the Marut; even spares for its existing Orpheus engines became scarce. This situation was one of the main reasons for the aircraft's early demise.
The Marut was described as "essentially a very long-drawn-out failure", and the aircraft's shortcomings were considered to be due to multiple factors.[11] Among these were the difficulties experienced in securing a suitable engine, which was principally a political issue; while arrangements were successfully established with the United Kingdom andBristol Siddeley for HAL to domestically produce the Orpheus, it was only suitable as an interim measure as it lacked the power to enable the Marut to achieve supersonic speed.[12] The Indian Government refused a proposal made byRolls-Royce to finance further development of the Orpheus, which had been specifically aimed at producing a more suitable engine for the Marut.[12][3]
Other envisioned alternative engines that might have been sourced from the Soviet Union, Egypt, or various European nations did not result in anything of substance.[3][13] TheGas Turbine Research Establishment also pursued their own development program to improve the Orpheus without external aid, which proceeded to the testing phase with some favourable results, but proved incompatible with the Marut.[14] As the particularities of a given airframe are typically heavily dependent on the engine used, the inability to improve the Marut's powerplant damaged its performance.[13] Despite experimentation with various engines, the Marut was never able to achieve supersonic speeds, which was viewed as a major failure.[5] IAF had anticipated the Marut being fitted with a considerably superior engine.[14][15]
The project was negatively affected by a lack of direction and management from theIndian Ministry of Defence.[13] A lack of coordination between the military, politicians, and industry is alleged to have been typical throughout the entirety of the programme, leaving many issues down to industry alone without guidance. Specifically, the government never sanctioned the development of an engine design team, nor were there assessments of HAL's capability toreverse engineer or to apply technologies from other projects, such as the work performed for the Folland Gnat.[16] HAL is claimed to have struggled to convince both the IAF and MoD that the design of the Marut was acceptable; much attention was given to the unacceptably high level of trail drag[clarification needed] the airframe produced, as well as dissatisfaction with the Marut's speed and manoeuvrability, both of which were below IAF specification upon the aircraft's introduction.[13]
Tank had a major influence on the project, and accordingly of its shortcomings. While working on the Marut, he was criticized for a rigid stance on aspects of the design,[17] and he typically had little interest in lobbying the Indian government for funding to refine the design. In addition, however, elements of the IAF have been alleged to have held dismissive attitudes toward Tank and of his abilities, rarely coordinated with him on issues with the aircraft, which in turn exacerbated the type's performance issues.[16] The level of technological transfer between Germany and India on the project was subject to criticism as well.[18]
Limitations within the Indian aerospace industry, which lacked the infrastructure and scientific base to successfully produce an effective indigenous combat aircraft at that time,[6] forced a heavy reliance on foreign technologies and imported components.[2] HAL's willingness to undertake overly-ambitious defence projects may also be partially responsible for the project's outcome.[2] The Marut was not only heavily dependent on foreign-sourced materials, but was more expensive to manufacture the type in India than to have imported completed aircraft.[3] The level of indigenous components increased over time, reportedly reaching 70 per cent by December 1973.[8] The allocation of scarce resources to reproducing components that could have been readily imported represented a high level ofopportunity cost to India.[6]
The IAF reportedly showed little confidence or interest in indigenous fighter technology, having openly expressed its preference for the French-builtDassault Ouragan as an alternative.[16] By the time the Marut entered mass production, the IAF had already purchased foreign-built fighters such as theHawker Hunter andSukhoi Su-7.[14] Following on from the Marut, HAL proceeded to produce larger quantities of both European and Soviet combat aircraftunder license, such as theSEPECAT Jaguar,Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21, andMikoyan MiG-27.[19]
The Marut was used in combat in a ground attack role, where its safety features such as manual controls whenever the hydraulic systems failed, and twin engines, increased survivability. According to aviation author Pushpindar Singh, the Marut had excellent low-level flying characteristics, but its maneuverability suffered due to the lack of engine power; maintenance issues also resulted in the type being problematic in service.[8]
In 1967, a single Marut was used as a testbed for the Egyptian indigenously-developedBrandner E-300 engine.[20] The Indian team was recalled in July 1969, while the Egypt-based Marut was abandoned.[8]
Given the limited number of Marut units, most Marut squadrons were considerably over-strength for the duration of their lives. According to Brian de Magray, at peak strength No.10 Squadron had on charge 32 Maruts, although the squadron probably did not hold a unit-establishment of more than 16. The Marut squadrons participated in the 1971 war and none were lost in air-to-air combat, although three were lost to ground fire, and one was destroyed on the ground. Three Marut pilots were awarded theVir Chakra commendation.[21][22]
Maruts constantly found themselves under heavy and concentrated fire from the ground during their low-level attack missions. On at least three occasions, Maruts regained their base after one engine had been lost to ground fire. On one of these, a Marut returned to base without escort on one engine, from about 150 mi (240 km) inside hostile territory. On another occasion, a pilot flying his Marut through debris that erupted into the air as he strafed a convoy felt a heavy blow to the rear fuselage of the aircraft, the engine damage warning lights immediately illuminated, and one engine cut out. Fortunately, the Marut attained a safe and reasonable recovery speed on one engine. Consequently, the pilot had no difficulty in flying his crippled fighter back to base. Another safety factor was the automatic reversion to manual control in the event of a failure in the hydraulic flying control system, and there were several instances of Maruts being flown back from a sortie manually. The Marut had a good survivability record in enemy airspace.[23]
In theIndo-Pakistani War of 1971, some Maruts andHawker Hunter aircraft were used to give close support to an Indian border post in the decisiveBattle of Longewala, on the morning of 5 December 1971. The aerial attack was credited with destroying a large number of tanks that had been deployed by Pakistani ground forces.[24] More than 300 combat sorties were flown by the Maruts during a two-week period in the war.[8]
According to Indian reports, one aerial kill was recorded as having been achieved by a Marut. On 7 December 1971, Squadron Leader KK Bakshi ofNo. 220 Squadron shot down a PAF F-86 Sabre (reportedly flown by Flying Officer Hamid Khwaja ofNo. 15 Squadron of thePakistan Air Force), however according to Pakistani reports, theF-86F Sabre (Serial No. 4030) had suffered anEngine flameout while chasing an IndianHawker Hunter over Khushalgarh.[25][26]
By 1982, the IAF was proposing that the Marut fleet be phased out on the basis that the type was "no longer operationally viable".[8] Supporters such as Air CommodoreJasjit Singh pointed out that the type had performed well in the 1971 combat, and had enjoyed superior safety records to other IAF aircraft such as the Gnat. Some aircraft had less than 100 recorded flight hours when the retirement of the Marut was being mooted.[8]
There are several surviving Maruts open to public inspection:[29][unreliable source?]
Data from Jane's All The World's Aircraft 1976–77[30]
General characteristics
Performance
Armament
| External videos | |
|---|---|
 Video overview of the Marut | |
| News report on the 50th anniversary of the Marut's first flight | |
| Contemporary silent footage of the Marut at an air show, including an aerial display |
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
Related lists
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
