Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Gyalrongic languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Branch of the Qiangic languages of Sino-Tibetan
Gyalrongic
Jiarongic, Rgyalrongic
Geographic
distribution
China
Linguistic classificationSino-Tibetan
Subdivisions
Language codes
Glottologrgya1241

TheGyalrongic languages (also known asRgyalrongic orJiarongic) constitute a branch of theQiangic languages ofSino-Tibetan,[1] but some propose that it may be part of a largerRung languages group and do not consider it to be particularly closely related to Qiangic but suggest that similarities between Gyalrongic and Qiangic may be from areal influence.[2] However, other work suggests that Qiangic as a whole may in fact beparaphyletic, with the only commonalities of the supposed "branch" being shared archaisms andareal features that were encouraged bylanguage contact.[3] Jacques & Michaud (2011) propose that Qiangic including Gyalrongic may belong to a largerBurmo-Qiangic group based on somelexical innovations.[4]

Geographical distribution

[edit]

The Gyalrongic languages are spoken inSichuan inChina, mainly in the autonomous Tibetan and Qiang prefectures ofKarmdzes andRngaba. These languages are distinguished by their conservative morphology and their phonological archaisms, which make them valuable forhistorical linguistics.

The cluster of languages variously referred to as Stau, Ergong or Horpa in the literature are spoken over a large area fromNdzamthang county (in Chinese Rangtang 壤塘县) inRngaba prefecture (Aba 阿坝州) toRtau county (Dawu 道孚) inDkarmdzes prefecture (Ganzi 甘孜州), inSichuan province, China. At the moment of writing, it is still unclear how many unintelligible varieties belong to this group, but at least three must be distinguished: the language of Rtau county (referred as ‘Stau’ in this paper), the Dgebshes language (Geshizha 格什扎话) spoken inRongbrag county (Danba 丹巴), and the Stodsde language (Shangzhai 上寨) in Ndzamthang.[5]

Gyalrongic languages are spoken predominantly in the four counties ofMa'erkang,Li,Xiaojin, andJinchuan inAba Prefecture, westernSichuan.[6] Other Gyalrongic lects are spoken in neighboring Heishui, Rangtang, Baoxing, Danba, and Daofu counties.

Classification

[edit]

The Gyalrongic languages share several features, notably in verbal morphology. Classifications such as Lai et al. (2020) split Gyalrongic into West and East branches.[7] Previous classifications operated a similar distinction between Ergong (~West Gyalrongic) and Gyalrong (~East Gyalrongic).[8]

The Gyalrong languages in turn constitute fourmutually unintelligible varieties: Eastern Gyalrong orSitu,Japhug,Tshobdun, andZbu.

Khroskyabs and Horpa are classified by Lin (1993) as a "western dialect" of Gyalrong, along with Eastern Gyalrong and the "northwestern dialect" (Japhug, Tshobdun, and Zbu). Otherwise, the scholarly consensus deems the distance between Khroskyabs, Horpa, and the Gyalrong cluster is greater than that between the Gyalrong languages. For example,Ethnologue reports 75% lexical similarity between Situ and Japhug, 60% between Japhug and Tshobdun, but only 13% between Situ and Horpa.

Huang (2007:180)[9] found that Horpa (Rta’u) and Gyalrong (Cogrtse) share only 15.2% cognacy, with 242 cognates out of a total of 1,592 words.

TheKhalong Tibetan language has a Gyalrongicsubstratum.[10]

TheChamdo languages (consisting ofLamo,Larong, andDrag-yab, a group of three closely related Sino-Tibetan languages spoken inChamdo, easternTibet) may or may not be Qiangic.[11][12][13]

Comparison with Tibetic

[edit]

Gyalrongic languages are surrounded byTibetic languages and have thus been in intense contact with them. However, there are many major lexical and morphological differences between them. Gyalrongic tend to use prefixes such as *kə-, *tə-, etc., while Tibetic languages use suffixes such as -pa/-ba, -ma, -po/-bo, -mo, etc. Below is a table of comparing words in bTshanlha andJaphug that do not have cognates inClassical Tibetan.[14]

GlossbTshanlhaJaphugClassical Tibetan
yeartəpalo
braintərnoktɯ-moʁklad pa
hailtərmokser ba
milktəlu’o ma
legtametɤmirkang pa
fishtʃhəɣjoqa-ɟynya
flowertapatme tog, men tog
tongueteʃmelce
redkəwərnekɯ-ɣɯmidmar po
yellowkɯ-qarŋeser (po)
sandkəwekbye ma
sheepkə-joqa-ʑolug
horsemborombrorta

References

[edit]
  1. ^Matisoff, James. 2004."Brightening" and the place of Xixia (Tangut) in the Qiangic subgroup of Tibeto-Burman
  2. ^LaPolla, Randy. 2003."Overview of Sino-Tibetan Morphosyntax". In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages., 30. London: Routledge.
  3. ^Katia Chirkova (2012)."The Qiangic subgroup from an areal perspective: A case study of languages of Muli"(PDF).Language and Linguistics.13 (1):133–170.
  4. ^Guillaume Jaques and Alexis Michaud (2011)."Approaching the historical phonology of three highly eroded Sino-Tibetan languages: Naxi, Na and Laze"(PDF).Diachronica.28:468–498.doi:10.1075/dia.28.4.02jac.S2CID 54013956.
  5. ^Jacques, Guillaume, Anton Antonov, Yunfan Lai & Lobsang Nima. 2017. Stau (Ergong, Horpa). In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages (2nd edition), 597–613. London: Routledge.[1]
  6. ^Nagano, Yasuhiko and Marielle Prins. 2013.rGyalrongic languages database. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology (Minpaku).
  7. ^Lai, Yunfan; Gong, Xun; Gates, Jesse P.; Jacques, Guillaume (2020-12-01). "Tangut as a West Gyalrongic language".Folia Linguistica.54 (s41 –s1). Walter de Gruyter GmbH:171–203.doi:10.1515/flih-2020-0006.ISSN 1614-7308.S2CID 229165606.
  8. ^Sun, Hongkai 孙宏开. 1988. 试论中国境内藏缅语的谱系分类 Shìlùn zhōngguó jìngnèi Zàng-Miǎnyǔ de pǔxì fēnlèi [A first attempt at classifying the Tibeto-Burman languages of China]. In Tatsuo Nishida & Paul Kazuhisa Eguchi (eds.),Languages and history in East Asia: Festschrift for Tatsuo Nishida on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 61–73. Kyoto: Shokado.
  9. ^Huang Bufan. 2007.Lawurongyu yanjiu (拉坞戎语研究) [A study of the Lavrung language]. Beijing: Minzu Press (民族出版社).
  10. ^Tournadre, Nicolas (2005). "L'aire linguistique tibétaine et ses divers dialectes."Lalies, 2005, n°25, p. 7–56.
  11. ^Suzuki, Hiroyuki and Tashi Nyima. 2018.Historical relationship among three non-Tibetic languages in Chamdo, TAR.Proceedings of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics (2018). Kyoto: Kyoto University.
  12. ^Zhao, Haoliang. 2018.A brief introduction to Zlarong, a newly recognized language in Mdzo sgang, TAR.Proceedings of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics (2018). Kyoto: Kyoto University.
  13. ^Jacques, Guillaumes. 2016.Les journées d'études sur les langues du Sichuan.
  14. ^Tournadre, Nicolas; Suzuki, Hiroyuki (2023).The Tibetic Languages: an introduction to the family of languages derived from Old Tibetan. Paris: LACITO. pp. 660–1.ISBN 978-2-490768-08-0. Archived fromthe original on 2023-09-29. Retrieved2023-09-24.

External links

[edit]
Sino-Tibetan branches
WesternHimalayas (Himachal,
Uttarakhand,Nepal,Sikkim)
Greater Magaric
Map of Sino-Tibetan languages
EasternHimalayas
(Tibet,Bhutan,Arunachal)
Myanmar and Indo-
Burmese border
Naga
Sal
East andSoutheast Asia
Burmo-Qiangic
Dubious (possible
isolates,Arunachal)
Greater Siangic
Proposed groupings
Proto-languages
Italics indicates single languages that are also considered to be separate branches.
Na-Qiangic languages
Naic
Namuyi
Shixing
Naish
Ersuic
Qiangic
Qiang
Gyalrongic
East Gyalrongic
West Gyalrongic
Chamdo
Choyo
Muya
Pumi
Zhaba
Cross (†) anditalics indicateextinct languages.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gyalrongic_languages&oldid=1318713117"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp