This articlemay beconfusing or unclear to readers. In particular, not all reforms discussed in this article were initiated by Gregory VII. This article could be improved by a more clear and accurate chronology, equal discussion of the key figures involved (such as Pope Nicholas II), and more robust contextualization. The term "Gregorian Reform" is widely used but somewhat misleading (a possible source of confusion), as Gregory VII was an important, but not the sole, pope to make reforms in this period. Please helpclarify the article. There might be a discussion about this onthe talk page.(March 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
TheGregorian Reforms were a series of reforms initiated byPope Gregory VII and the circle he formed in thepapal curia, c. 1050–1080, which dealt with the moral integrity and independence of theclergy. The reforms are considered to be named after Pope Gregory VII (1073–1085), though he personally denied it and claimed his reforms, like hisregnal name, honouredPope Gregory I.
The Gregorian reform was a frontal attack against the political-religious collusion dating fromthe Carolingians, in which institutions and church property were largely controlled by secular authorities while the clerics from pope and bishop to country priest were subject by customary law to the authority of the emperor, the king, the prince or the lord.
The following practices were thus most protested against:[1][2]
During Gregory's pontificate, a conciliar approach to implementing papal reform took on an added momentum.Conciliarism properly refers to a later system of power between the Pope, the Roman curia, and secular authorities. During this early period, the scope of Papal authority in the wake of theInvestiture Controversy entered into dialogue with developing notions ofPapal supremacy. The authority of the emphatically "Roman" council as the universal legislative assembly was theorised according to the principles of papal primacy contained inDictatus papae.
Gregory also had to avoid theCatholic Church slipping back into the abuses that had occurred in Rome, during theRule of the Harlots, between 904 and 964.Pope Benedict IX had been elected Pope three times and had sold the Papacy. In 1054 the"Great Schism" had divided Western European Christians from theEastern Orthodox Church. Given these events, the Catholic Church had to reassert its importance andauthority to its followers. Within the church, important new laws were pronounced onsimony, onclerical marriage and from 1059 on extending the prohibited degrees ofaffinity.[3] Although at each new turn the reforms were presented to contemporaries as a return to the old ways, they are often seen by modern historians[who?] as novel.[citation needed] The much laterGregorian calendar ofPope Gregory XIII has no connection to those Gregorian reforms.
The reforms are encoded in two major documents:Dictatus papae and thebullLibertas ecclesiae. The Gregorian reform depended in new ways and to a new degree on the collections ofcanon law that were being assembled, in order to buttress the papal position, during the same period. Part of the legacy of the Gregorian Reform was the new figure of thepapal legist, exemplified a century later byPope Innocent III. There is no explicit mention of Gregory's reforms againstsimony (the selling of church offices and sacred things) ornicolaism (which included ritual fornication) at his Lenten Councils of 1075 or 1076. Rather, the gravity of these reforms has to be inferred from his general correspondence. By contrast, Gregory's Register[4] entry for the Roman Council of November 1078 extensively records Gregory's legislation against 'abuses' such as simony[5] as well as the first 'full' prohibition of lay investiture. This record has been interpreted as the essence of the Gregorian 'reform programme'.[6]
The powers that the Gregorian papacy gathered to itself are summed up in a list calledDictatus papae around 1075 or shortly after. The major headings of Gregorian reform[further explanation needed] can be seen as embodied in the Papal electoral decree ofPope Nicholas II,In Nomine Domini (1059), and the temporary resolution of theInvestiture Controversy (1075–1122) was an overwhelming papal victory. The resolution of this controversy acknowledged papal superiority over secular rulers by implication.
Before the Gregorian Reforms the Catholic Church was a heavily decentralized institution, in which the pope held little power outside his position as Bishop of Rome. With that in mind, the papacy up until the twelfth century held little to no authority over the bishops, who were invested with land by lay rulers. Gregory VII's ban on lay investiture was a key element of the reform, ultimately contributing to the centralized papacy of the later Middle Ages.[7]
The reform of the church, both within it, and in relation to theHoly Roman Emperor and the other lay rulers of Europe, was Gregory VII's life work. It was based on his conviction that the church was founded by God and entrusted with the task of embracing all mankind in a single society in which divine will is the only law; that, in his capacity as a divine institution, he is supreme over all human structures, especially the secular state; and that the pope, in his role as head of the church under the petrine commission, is the vice-regent of God on earth, so that disobedience to him implies disobedience to God: or, in other words, a defection from Christianity. But any attempt to interpret this in terms of action would have bound the church to annihilate not merely a single state, but all states. Thus Gregory, as a politician wanting to achieve some result, was driven in practice to adopt a different standpoint. He acknowledged the existence of the state as a dispensation ofProvidence, described the coexistence of church and state as a divine ordinance, and emphasized the necessity of union between thesacerdotium and theimperium. But, during no period would he have imagined the two powers on an equal footing. The superiority of Church to State was to him a fact which admitted no discussion and which he had never doubted.
He wished to see all important matters of dispute referred to Rome; appeals were to be addressed to himself; the centralization of ecclesiastical government in Rome naturally involved a curtailment of the powers of bishops. Since these refused to submit voluntarily and tried to assert their traditional independence, his papacy was full of struggles against the higher ranks of the clergy.
This battle for the foundation of papal supremacy is connected with his championship of compulsorycelibacy among the clergy and his attack onsimony. Gregory VII did not introduce the celibacy of the priesthood into the church,[citation needed] but he took up the struggle with greater energy than his predecessors. In 1074 he published anencyclical, absolving the people from their obedience to bishops who allowed married priests. The next year he enjoined them to take action against married priests and deprived these clerics of their revenues. Both the campaign against priestly marriage and that against simony provoked widespread resistance.