Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Greenhouse gas emissions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Greenhouse gases emitted from human activities
Greenhouse gas emissions per person in the highest-emitting countries.[1] Areas of rectangles represent total emissions for each country.

Greenhouse gas (GHG)emissions from human activities intensify thegreenhouse effect. This contributes toclimate change.Carbon dioxide (CO2), from burningfossil fuels such ascoal,oil, andnatural gas, is the main cause of climate change. Thelargest annual emissions are from China followed by the United States. The United States hashigher emissions per capita. The main producers fueling the emissions globally arelarge oil and gas companies. Emissions from human activities have increasedatmospheric carbon dioxide by about 50% over pre-industrial levels. The growing levels of emissions have varied, but have been consistent among allgreenhouse gases. Emissions in the 2010s averaged 56 billion tons a year, higher than any decade before.[2] Total cumulative emissions from 1870 to 2022 were 703GtC (2575GtCO2), of which 484±20GtC (1773±73GtCO2) fromfossil fuels and industry, and 219±60GtC (802±220GtCO2) fromland use change.Land-use change,such as deforestation, caused about 31% of cumulative emissions over 1870–2022,coal 32%, oil 24%, and gas 10%.[3][4]

Carbon dioxide is the main greenhouse gas resulting from human activities. It accounts for more than half of warming.Methane (CH4) emissions have almost the same short-term impact.[5]Nitrous oxide (N2O) andfluorinated gases (F-gases) play a lesser role in comparison. Emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide in 2023 were all higher than ever before.[6]

Electricity generation, heat andtransport are major emitters; overall energy is responsible for around 73% of emissions.[7] A growing concern for electricity usage is the expansion of artificial intelligence (AI), which is projected to significantly increase global energy demand.[8]Deforestation and other changes in land use also emit carbon dioxide andmethane. The largest source of anthropogenicmethane emissions isagriculture, closely followed bygas venting andfugitive emissions from thefossil-fuel industry. The largest agricultural methane source islivestock.Agricultural soils emitnitrous oxide partly due tofertilizers. Similarly,fluorinated gases fromrefrigerants play an outsized role in total human emissions.

The current CO2-equivalent emission rates averaging 6.6 tonnes per person per year,[9] are well over twice the estimated rate 2.3 tons[10][11] required to stay within the 2030 Paris Agreement increase of 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) over pre-industrial levels.[12] Annual per capita emissions in the industrialized countries are typically as much as ten times the average in developing countries.[13]

Thecarbon footprint (orgreenhouse gas footprint) serves as an indicator to compare the amount of greenhouse gases emitted over the entirelife cycle from the production of a good or service along thesupply chain to its final consumption.[14][15]Carbon accounting (or greenhouse gas accounting) is a framework of methods to measure and track how muchgreenhouse gas an organization emits.[16] This accounting is used to help understand the various effects of emissions on positive and negative impacts they have on the climate including on human mortality.[17]

Relevance for greenhouse effect and global warming

[edit]
These paragraphs are an excerpt fromGreenhouse effect.[edit]

Thegreenhouse effect occurs whenheat-trapping gases in a planet's atmosphere prevent the planet from losing heat to space, raising its surface temperature. Surface heating can happen from an internal heat source (as in the case ofJupiter) or come from an external source, such as ahost star. In the case ofEarth, theSun emitsshortwave radiation (sunlight) that passes through greenhouse gases to heat the Earth's surface. In response, the Earth's surface emitslongwave radiation that is mostlyabsorbed by greenhouse gases, reducing the rate at which the Earth can cool off.

Without the greenhouse effect, the Earth's average surface temperature would be as cold as −18 °C (−0.4 °F).[18][19] This is of course much less than the 20th century average of about 14 °C (57 °F).[20][21] In addition to naturally present greenhouse gases, burning offossil fuels has increased amounts ofcarbon dioxide andmethane in the atmosphere.[22][23] As a result,global warming of about 1.2 °C (2.2 °F) has occurred since theIndustrial Revolution,[24] with the global average surface temperature increasing at a rate of 0.18 °C (0.32 °F) per decade since 1981.[25]

Overview of main sources

[edit]

Relevant greenhouse gases

[edit]
See also:Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere andAtmospheric methane

The major anthropogenic (human origin) sources of greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N
2
O
), methane and three groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride (SF
6
),hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) andperfluorocarbons (PFCs, sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)).[26] Though thegreenhouse effect is heavily driven bywater vapor,[27] human emissions of water vapor are not a significant contributor to warming.

AlthoughCFCs are greenhouse gases, they are regulated by theMontreal Protocol which was motivated by CFCs' contribution toozone depletion rather than by their contribution to global warming. Ozone depletion has only a minor role in greenhouse warming, though the two processes are sometimes confused in the media. In 2016, negotiators from over 170 nations meeting at the summit of theUnited Nations Environment Programme reached a legally binding accord to phase outhydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in theKigali Amendment to theMontreal Protocol.[28][29][30] The use of CFC-12 (except some essential uses) has been phased out due to itsozone depleting properties.[31] The phasing-out of less activeHCFC-compounds will be completed in 2030.[32]

Human activities

[edit]
The industrial era growth in atmospheric CO2-equivalent gas concentrations since 1750[33]

Starting about 1750, industrial activity powered by fossil fuels began to significantly increase the concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Emissions have grown rapidly since about 1950 with ongoing expansions in global population and economic activity following World War II. As of 2021, measured atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide were almost 50% higher than pre-industrial levels.[33][34]

The main sources of greenhouse gases due to human activity (also calledcarbon sources) are:

Global estimates

[edit]
See also:Arctic methane emissions andGreenhouse gas emissions from wetlands
This section needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(April 2024)
Per capita CO2 emissions surged after the mid-20th century, but then slowed their rate of growth.[44]

Global greenhouse gas emissions are about 50 Gt per year[45] and for 2019 have been estimated at 57 Gt CO2 eq including 5 Gt due to land use change.[46] In 2019, approximately 34% [20 GtCO2-eq] of total net anthropogenic GHG emissions came from the energy supply sector, 24% [14 GtCO2-eq] from industry, 22% [13 GtCO2-eq] from agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU), 15% [8.7 GtCO2-eq] from transport and 6% [3.3 GtCO2-eq] from buildings.[47]

The current CO2-equivalent emission rates averaging 6.6 tonnes per person per year,[9] are well over twice the estimated rate 2.3 tons[10][11] required to stay within the 2030 Paris Agreement increase of 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) over pre-industrial levels.[12]

While cities are sometimes considered to be disproportionate contributors to emissions, per-capita emissions tend to be lower for cities than the averages in their countries.[48]

A 2017 survey of corporations responsible for global emissions found that100 companies were responsible for 71% of global direct and indirect emissions, and that state-owned companies were responsible for 59% of their emissions.[49][50]

China is, by a significant margin, Asia's and the world's largest emitter; it emits nearly 10 billion tonnes each year, more than one-quarter of global emissions.[51] Other countries with fast growing emissions areSouth Korea, Iran, and Australia (which apart from the oil rich Persian Gulf states, now has the highest per capita emission rate in the world). On the other hand, annual per capita emissions of the EU-15 and the US are gradually decreasing over time.[52] Emissions in Russia and Ukraine have decreased fastest since 1990 due to economic restructuring in these countries.[53]

2015 was the first year to see both total global economic growth and a reduction of carbon emissions.[54]

High income countries compared to low income countries

[edit]
Scaling the effect of wealth to the national level: richer(developed) countries emit more CO2 per person than poorer(developing) countries.[55] Emissions are roughly proportional toGDP per person, though the rate of increase diminishes with average GDP/pp of about $10,000.

Annual per capita emissions in the industrialized countries are typically as much as ten times the average in developing countries.[13]: 144  Due to China's fast economic development, its annual per capita emissions are quickly approaching the levels of those in theAnnex I group of the Kyoto Protocol (i.e., the developed countries excluding the US).[52]

Africa and South America are both fairly small emitters, accounting for 3-4% of global emissions each. Both have emissions almost equal to international aviation and shipping.[51]

Calculations and reporting

[edit]
Further information:Carbon accounting,Carbon footprint, andGreenhouse gas inventory

Variables

[edit]

There are several ways of measuring greenhouse gas emissions. Some variables that have been reported include:[56]

  • Definition of measurement boundaries: Emissions can be attributed geographically, to the area where they were emitted (the territory principle) or by the activity principle to the territory that produced the emissions. These two principles result in different totals when measuring, for example, electricity importation from one country to another, or emissions at an international airport.
  • Time horizon of different gases: The contribution of given greenhouse gas is reported as a CO2 equivalent. The calculation to determine this takes into account how long that gas remains in the atmosphere. This is not always known accurately[clarification needed] and calculations must be regularly updated to reflect new information.
  • The measurement protocol itself: This may be via direct measurement or estimation. The four main methods are the emission factor-based method, mass balance method, predictiveemissions monitoring systems, andcontinuous emissions monitoring systems. These methods differ in accuracy, cost, and usability. Public information fromspace-based measurements of carbon dioxide byClimate Trace is expected to reveal individual large plants before the2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference.[57]

These measures are sometimes used by countries to assert various policy/ethical positions on climate change.[58]: 94 The use of different measures leads to a lack of comparability, which is problematic when monitoring progress towards targets. There are arguments for the adoption of a common measurement tool, or at least the development of communication between different tools.[56]

Reporting

[edit]

Emissions may be tracked over long time periods, known as historical or cumulative emissions measurements. Cumulative emissions provide some indicators of what is responsible for greenhouse gas atmospheric concentration build-up.[59]: 199 

National accounts balance

[edit]
See also:Carbon leakage
Substantial land-use change contributions to emissions have been made by Latin America, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Pacific Islands. Area of rectangles shows total emissions in 2019 for that region.[60]

The national accounts balance tracks emissions based on the difference between a country's exports and imports. For many richer nations, the balance is negative because more goods are imported than they are exported. This result is mostly due to the fact that it is cheaper to produce goods outside of developed countries, leading developed countries to become increasingly dependent on services and not goods. A positive account balance would mean that more production was occurring within a country, so more operational factories would increase carbon emission levels.[61]

Emissions may also be measured across shorter time periods. Emissions changes may, for example, be measured against the base year of 1990. 1990 was used in theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) as the base year for emissions, and is also used in theKyoto Protocol (some gases are also measured from the year 1995).[13]: 146, 149  A country's emissions may also be reported as a proportion of global emissions for a particular year.

Another measurement is of per capita emissions. This divides a country's total annual emissions by its mid-year population.[62]: 370  Per capita emissions may be based on historical or annual emissions.[58]: 106–107 

Embedded emissions

[edit]
See also:Embedded emissions

One way of attributing greenhouse gas emissions is to measure theembedded emissions (also referred to as "embodied emissions") of goods that are being consumed. Emissions are usually measured according to production, rather than consumption.[63] For example, in the main internationaltreaty on climate change (theUNFCCC), countries report on emissions produced within their borders, e.g. the emissions produced from burning fossil fuels.[64]: 179 [65]: 1  Under a production-based accounting of emissions, embedded emissions on imported goods are attributed to the exporting, rather than the importing, country. Under a consumption-based accounting of emissions, embedded emissions on imported goods are attributed to the importing country, rather than the exporting, country.

A substantial proportion of CO2 emissions is traded internationally. The net effect of trade was to export emissions from China and other emerging markets to consumers in the US, Japan, and Western Europe.[65]: 4 

Carbon footprint

[edit]
This section is an excerpt fromCarbon footprint.[edit]

Acarbon footprint (or greenhouse gas footprint) is a calculated value or index that makes it possible to compare the total amount ofgreenhouse gases that an activity, product, company or country adds to the atmosphere. Carbon footprints are usually reported in tonnes of emissions (CO2-equivalent) per unit of comparison. Such units can be for exampletonnes CO2-eq per year,per kilogram of protein for consumption,per kilometer travelled,per piece of clothing and so forth. A product's carbon footprint includes the emissions for the entirelife cycle. These run from the production along thesupply chain to its final consumption and disposal.

Similarly, an organization's carbon footprint includes the direct as well as the indirect emissions that it causes. TheGreenhouse Gas Protocol (forcarbon accounting of organizations) calls theseScope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. There are several methodologies and online tools to calculate the carbon footprint. They depend on whether the focus is on a country, organization, product or individual person. For example, the carbon footprint of a product could help consumers decide which product to buy if they want to beclimate aware. Forclimate change mitigation activities, the carbon footprint can help distinguish those economic activities with a high footprint from those with a low footprint. So the carbon footprint concept allows everyone to make comparisons between the climate impacts of individuals, products, companies and countries. It also helps people devise strategies and priorities for reducing the carbon footprint.


Consumption-based accounting is therefore more comprehensive. This comprehensive carbon footprint reporting including Scope 3 emissions deals with gaps in current systems. Countries'GHG inventories for theUNFCCC do not include international transport.[66] Comprehensive carbon footprint reporting looks at the final demand for emissions, to where the consumption of the goods and services takes place.[67]

Emission intensity

[edit]
Further information:Emission intensity

Emission intensity is a ratio between greenhouse gas emissions and another metric, e.g., gross domestic product (GDP) or energy use. The terms "carbon intensity" and "emissions intensity" are also sometimes used.[68] Emission intensities may be calculated usingmarket exchange rates (MER) orpurchasing power parity (PPP).[58]: 96 

Example tools and websites

[edit]

Carbon accounting (or greenhouse gas accounting) is a framework of methods to measure and track how much greenhouse gas an organization emits.[16]

Climate TRACE

[edit]
This section is an excerpt fromClimate TRACE.[edit]
Climate TRACE (Tracking Real-Time Atmospheric Carbon Emissions)[69] is an independent group which monitors and publishes greenhouse gas emissions.[70] It launched in 2021 beforeCOP26,[71] and improvesmonitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) of bothcarbon dioxide andmethane.[72][73] The group monitors sources such ascoal mines andpower station smokestacks worldwide,[74]with satellite data (but not their own satellites) andartificial intelligence.[75][76]

Historical trends

[edit]

Cumulative and historical emissions

[edit]
Cumulative and annual CO2 emissions
Cumulatively, the U.S. has emitted the greatest amount of CO2, though China's emission trend is now steeper.[44]
Annually, the U.S. emitted the most CO2 until early in the 21st century, when China's annual emissions began to dominate.[44]
[[file:Cumulative CO2 emission by world region.png|0px|alt=]]
Cumulative CO2 emission by world region
Cumulative per person emissions by world region in 3 time periods
CO2 emissions by source since 1880

Cumulative anthropogenic (i.e., human-emitted) emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel use are a major cause ofglobal warming,[77] and give some indication of which countries have contributed most to human-induced climate change. In particular, CO2 stays in the atmosphere for at least 150 years and up to 1000 years,[78] whilst methane disappears within a decade or so,[79] and nitrous oxides last about 100 years.[80] The graph gives some indication of which regions have contributed most to human-induced climate change.[81][82]: 15  When these numbers are calculated per capita cumulative emissions based on then-current population the situation is shown even more clearly. The ratio in per capita emissions between industrialized countries and developing countries was estimated at more than 10 to 1.

Non-OECD countries accounted for 42% of cumulative energy-related CO2 emissions between 1890 and 2007.[64]: 179–80  Over this time period, the US accounted for 28% of emissions; the EU, 23%; Japan, 4%; other OECD countries 5%; Russia, 11%; China, 9%; India, 3%; and the rest of the world, 18%.[64]: 179–80 The European Commission adopted a set of legislative proposals targeting a reduction of the CO2 emissions by 55% by 2030.

Overall, developed countries accounted for 83.8% of industrial CO2 emissions over this time period, and 67.8% of total CO2 emissions. Developing countries accounted for industrial CO2 emissions of 16.2% over this time period, and 32.2% of total CO2 emissions.

However, what becomes clear when we look at emissions across the world today is that the countries with the highest emissions over history are not always the biggest emitters today. For example, in 2017, the UK accounted for just 1% of global emissions.[51]

In comparison, humans have emitted more greenhouse gases than theChicxulub meteorite impact event which caused theextinction of the dinosaurs.[83]

Transport, together withelectricity generation, is the major source of greenhouse gas emissions in theEU. Greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector continue to rise, in contrast to power generation and nearly all other sectors. Since 1990, transportation emissions have increased by 30%. The transportation sector accounts for around 70% of these emissions. The majority of these emissions are caused by passengervehicles and vans. Road travel is the first major source of greenhouse gas emissions from transportation, followed by aircraft and maritime.[84][85] Waterborne transportation is still the leastcarbon-intensive mode of transportation on average, and it is an essential link insustainablemultimodal freight supply chains.[86]

Buildings, like industry, are directly responsible for around one-fifth of greenhouse gas emissions, primarily fromspace heating and hot water consumption. When combined with power consumption within buildings, this figure climbs to more than one-third.[87][7][88]

Within the EU, theagricultural sector presently accounts for roughly 10% of total greenhouse gas emissions, with methane from livestock accounting for slightly more than half of 10%.[89]

Estimates of total CO2 emissions do includebiotic carbon emissions, mainly from deforestation.[58]: 94  Including biotic emissions brings about the same controversy mentioned earlier regarding carbon sinks and land-use change.[58]: 93–94  The actual calculation of net emissions is very complex, and is affected by how carbon sinks are allocated between regions and the dynamics of theclimate system.

Changes since a particular base year

[edit]
See also:Greenhouse gas inventory

The sharp acceleration in CO2 emissions since 2000 to more than a 3% increase per year (more than 2 ppm per year) from 1.1% per year during the 1990s is attributable to the lapse of formerly declining trends incarbon intensity of both developing and developed nations. China was responsible for most of global growth in emissions during this period. Localised plummeting emissions associated with the collapse of the Soviet Union have been followed by slow emissions growth in this region due to moreefficient energy use, made necessary by the increasing proportion of it that is exported.[90] In comparison, methane has not increased appreciably, andN
2
O
by 0.25% y−1.

Using different base years for measuring emissions has an effect on estimates of national contributions to global warming.[82]: 17–18 [91] This can be calculated by dividing a country's highest contribution to global warming starting from a particular base year, by that country's minimum contribution to global warming starting from a particular base year. Choosing between base years of 1750, 1900, 1950, and 1990 has a significant effect for most countries.[82]: 17–18 

Data from Global Carbon Project

[edit]
Map of key fossil fuel projects ("carbon bombs"): proposed or existing fossil fuel extraction projects (a coal mine, oil or gas project) that would result in more than 1 gigaton of CO2 emissions if its reserves were completely extracted and burnt.[92]

TheGlobal Carbon Project continuously releases data about CO2 emissions, budget and concentration.

CO2 emissions[93]
YearFossil fuels

and industry (excluding cement carbonation)Gt C

Land use

changeGt C

Total

Gt C

Total

Gt CO2

20109.1061.3210.4338.0
20119.4121.3510.7639.2
20129.5541.3210.8739.6
20139.6401.2610.939.7
20149.7101.3411.0540.2
20159.7041.4711.1740.7
20169.6951.2410.9339.8
20179.8521.1811.0340.2
201810.0511.1411.1940.7
201910.1201.2411.3641.3
20209.6241.1110.7339.1
202110.1321.0811.2140.8
2022

(projection)

10.21.0811.2841.3

Emissions by type of greenhouse gas

[edit]
See also:IPCC list of greenhouse gases
Distribution of global greenhouse gas emissions based on type of greenhouse gas, without land-use change, using 100 yearglobal warming potential (data from 2020).
Total: 49.8 GtCO2e[94]: 5 
  1. CO2 mostly by fossil fuel (72.0%)
  2. CH4 methane (19.0%)
  3. N
    2
    O
    nitrous oxide (6.00%)
  4. Fluorinated gases (3.00%)

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the dominant emitted greenhouse gas, while methane (CH4) emissions almost have the same short-term impact.[5] Nitrous oxide (N2O) and fluorinated gases (F-gases) play a lesser role in comparison.

Greenhouse gas emissions are measured inCO2 equivalents determined by theirglobal warming potential (GWP), which depends on their lifetime in the atmosphere. Estimations largely depend on the ability of oceans and land sinks to absorb these gases.Short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) including methane,hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),tropospheric ozone andblack carbon persist in the atmosphere for a period ranging from days to 15 years; whereas carbon dioxide can remain in the atmosphere for millennia.[95] Reducing SLCP emissions can cut the ongoing rate of global warming by almost half and reduce the projectedArctic warming by two-thirds.[96]

Greenhouse gas emissions in 2019 were estimated at 57.4 GtCO2e, while CO2 emissions alone made up 42.5 Gt including land-use change (LUC).[97]

While mitigation measures fordecarbonization are essential on the longer term, they could result in weak near-term warming because sources of carbon emissions often also co-emitair pollution. Hence, pairing measures that target carbon dioxide with measures targeting non-CO2 pollutants – short-lived climate pollutants, which have faster effects on the climate, is essential for climate goals.[98]

Carbon dioxide (CO2)

[edit]
  • Fossil fuel (use for energy generation, transport, heating and machinery in industrial plants):oil,gas andcoal (89%) are the major driver of anthropogenic global warming with annual emissions of 35.6 GtCO2 in 2019.[99]: 20 
  • Cement production (burning of fossil fuels) (4%) is estimated at 1.42 GtCO2
  • Land-use change (LUC) is the imbalance ofdeforestation andreforestation. Estimations are very uncertain at 4.5 GtCO2.Wildfires alone cause annual emissions of about 7 GtCO2[100][101]
  • Non-energy use of fuels, carbon losses in coke ovens, andflaring in crude oil production.[99]

Methane (CH4)

[edit]
See also:Methane emissions andArctic methane emissions

Methane has a high immediate impact with a 5-year global warming potential of up to 100.[5] Given this, the current 389 Mt of methane emissions[99]: 6  has about the same short-term global warming effect as CO2 emissions, with a risk to trigger irreversible changes in climate and ecosystems. For methane, a reduction of about 30% below current emission levels would lead to a stabilization in its atmospheric concentration.

  • Fossil fuels (32%) (emissions due to losses during production and transport) account for most of the methane emissions including coal mining (12% of methane total), gas distribution and leakages (11%) as well as gas venting in oil production (9%).[99]: 6 [99]: 12 
  • Livestock (28%) with cattle (21%) as the dominant source, followed by buffalo (3%), sheep (2%), and goats (1.5%).[99]: 6, 23 
  • Human waste and wastewater (21%): When biomass waste in landfills and organic substances in domestic andindustrial wastewater is decomposed by bacteria in anaerobic conditions, substantial amounts of methane are generated.[99]: 12 
  • Rice cultivation (10%) on flooded rice fields is another agricultural source, whereanaerobic decomposition of organic material produces methane.[99]: 12 

Nitrous oxide (N
2
O
)

[edit]

N2O has a high GWP and significant Ozone Depleting Potential. It is estimated that the global warming potential of N2O over 100 years is 265 times greater than CO2.[102] For N2O, a reduction of more than 50% would be required for a stabilization.

Most emissions (56%) of nitrous oxide comes from agriculture, especially meat production: cattle (droppings on pasture), fertilizers, animal manure.[99]: 12 Further contributions come from combustion of fossil fuels (18%) andbiofuels[103] as well as industrial production ofadipic acid andnitric acid.

F-gases

[edit]

Fluorinated gases includehydrofluorocarbons (HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC),sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), andnitrogen trifluoride (NF3). They are used by switchgear in the power sector, semiconductor manufacture, aluminum production and a largely unknown source of SF6.[99]: 38  Continued phase down of manufacture and use of HFCs under theKigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol will help reduce HFC emissions and concurrently improve the energy efficiency of appliances that use HFCs like air conditioners, freezers and other refrigeration devices.

Hydrogen

[edit]

Hydrogen leakages contribute to indirect global warming.[104]When hydrogen is oxidized in the atmosphere, the result is an increase in concentrations of greenhouse gases in both the troposphere and the stratosphere.[105] Hydrogen can leak fromhydrogen production facilities as well as any infrastructure in which hydrogen is transported, stored, or consumed.[106]

Black carbon

[edit]

Black carbon is formed through the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels,biofuel, andbiomass. It is not a greenhouse gas but aclimate forcing agent. Black carbon can absorb sunlight and reducealbedo when deposited on snow and ice. Indirect heating can be caused by the interaction with clouds.[107] Black carbon stays in the atmosphere for only several days to weeks.[108] Emissions may be mitigated by upgrading coke ovens, installing particulate filters on diesel-based engines, reducingroutine flaring, and minimizing open burning of biomass.

Emissions by sector

[edit]
See also:Climate change mitigation § Mitigation by sector
Contributions to climate change broken down by economic sector as of 2019

Global greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed to differentsectors of the economy. This provides a picture of the varying contributions of different types of economic activity to climate change, and helps in understanding the changes required tomitigate climate change.

Greenhouse gas emissions can be divided into those that arise from the combustion of fuels to produce energy, and those generated by other processes. Around two thirds of greenhouse gas emissions arise from the combustion of fuels.[109]

Energy may be produced at the point ofconsumption, or by a generator for consumption by others. Thus emissions arising from energy production may be categorized according to where they are emitted, or where the resulting energy is consumed. If emissions are attributed at the point of production, then electricity generators contribute about 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[110] If these emissions are attributed to the final consumer then 24% of total emissions arise from manufacturing and construction, 17% from transportation, 11% from domestic consumers, and 7% from commercial consumers.[111] Around 4% of emissions arise from the energy consumed by the energy and fuel industry itself.

The remaining third of emissions arise from processes other than energy production. 12% of total emissions arise from agriculture, 7% from land use change and forestry, 6% from industrial processes, and 3% from waste.[109]

Electricity generation

[edit]
See also:Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of energy sources
Emissions attributed to specific power stations around the world, color-coded by type of fuel used at the station. Lower half focuses on Europe and Asia[112]

Coal-fired power stations are the single largest emitter, with over 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2018.[113] Although much less polluting than coal plants, naturalgas-fired power plants are also major emitters,[114] taking electricity generation as a whole over 25% in 2018.[115] Notably, just 5% of the world's power plants account for almost three-quarters of carbon emissions from electricity generation, based on an inventory of more than 29,000 fossil-fuel power plants across 221 countries.[116] In the 2022 IPCC report, it is noted that providing modern energy services universally would only increase greenhouse gas emissions by a few percent at most. This slight increase means that the additional energy demand that comes from supporting decent living standards for all would be far lower than current average energy consumption.[117]

In March 2024, theInternational Energy Agency (IEA) reported that in 2023, global CO2 emissions from energy sources increased by 1.1%, rising by 410 million tonnes to a record 37.4 billion tonnes, primarily due to coal. Drought-related decreases in hydropower contributed to a 170 million tonne rise in emissions, which would have otherwise led to a decrease in the electricity sector's emissions.[118] The implementation ofclean energy technologies likesolar,wind, nuclear,heat pumps, andelectric vehicles since 2019 has significantly tempered emissions growth, which would have been threefold without these technologies.[118]

Agriculture, forestry and land use

[edit]

Agriculture

[edit]
See also:Methane emissions
This section is an excerpt fromGreenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.[edit]

Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture are large: the agriculture, forestry and land use sectors contribute between 13% and 21% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[119]Direct greenhouse gas emissions include those fromrice andlivestock farming.[120]Indirect emissions from the conversion of non-agricultural land such asforests into agricultural land are also very important.[121][122] With regards to direct emissions,nitrous oxide andmethane makeup over half of total greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.[123] A 2023 review emphasizes that emissions from agricultural soils are shaped by factors such as soil type, climate, and management practices. It also highlights several mitigation strategies, including conservation tillage, precision agriculture, improved water use, and the application of biochar, that can reduce emissions and enhance soil carbon storage.[124]

Furthermore, there is alsofossil fuel consumption for transport andfertilizer production. For example, themanufacture and use ofnitrogen fertilizer contributes around 5% of all global greenhouse gas emissions.[125]Livestock farming is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions.[126]

Farm animals' digestive systems can be put into two categories:monogastric andruminant. Ruminant cattle for beef and dairy rank high in greenhouse gas emissions. In comparison, monogastric, or pigs and poultry-related foods, are lower. The consumption of the monogastric types may yield less emissions. Monogastric animals have a higher feed-conversion efficiency and also do not produce as much methane.[127] Non-ruminant livestock, such as poultry, emit much less greenhouse gas.[128]
Deforestation
[edit]
Mean annual carbon loss from tropical deforestation[129]
Further information:Deforestation § Atmospheric, andDeforestation and climate change

Deforestation is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. A study shows annual carbon emissions (or carbon loss) from tropical deforestation have doubled during the last two decades and continue to increase. (0.97 ±0.16 PgC per year in 2001–2005 to 1.99 ±0.13 PgC per year in 2015–2019)[130][129]

Land-use change
[edit]
Main article:Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture

Land-use change, e.g., the clearing of forests for agricultural use, can affect the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by altering how much carbon flows out of the atmosphere intocarbon sinks.[131] Accounting for land-use change can be understood as an attempt to measure "net" emissions, i.e., gross emissions from all sources minus the removal of emissions from the atmosphere by carbon sinks.[58]: 92–93 

There are substantial uncertainties in the measurement of net carbon emissions.[132] Additionally, there is controversy over how carbon sinks should be allocated between different regions and over time.[58]: 93  For instance, concentrating on more recent changes in carbon sinks is likely to favour those regions that have deforested earlier, e.g., Europe.

In1997, human-caused Indonesian peat fires were estimated to have released between 13% and 40% of the average annual global carbon emissions caused by the burning offossil fuels.[133][134][135]

Transport of people and goods

[edit]
Aviation and shipping (dashed line) produce a significant proportion of global carbon dioxide emissions.
Further information:Climate change mitigation § Transport,Environmental effects of shipping § Greenhouse gas emissions,Environmental aspects of the electric car, andEnvironmental design in rail transportation

Transportation accounts for 15% of emissions worldwide.[136] Over a quarter of global transport CO2 emissions are from road freight,[137] so many countries are further restrictingtruck CO2 emissions to help limit climate change.[138]

Maritime transport accounts for 3.5% to 4% of all greenhouse gas emissions, primarily carbon dioxide.[139][140] In 2022, the shipping industry's 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions made it "the sixth largest greenhouse gas emitter worldwide, ranking between Japan and Germany."[141][142][143]

Aviation

[edit]
Further information:Environmental effects of aviation § Climate change

Jet airliners contribute to climate change by emitting carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides,contrails and particulates.In 2018, global commercial operations generated 2.4% of all CO2 emissions.[144]

In 2020, approximately 3.5% of the overall human impacts on climate are from the aviation sector. The impact of the sector on climate in the last 20 years had doubled, but the part of the contribution of the sector in comparison to other sectors did not change because other sectors grew as well.[145]

Some representative figures for CO2 average direct emissions (not accounting for high-altitude radiative effects) of airliners expressed as CO2 and CO2 equivalent per passenger kilometer:[146]

  • Domestic, short distance, less than 463 km (288 mi): 257 g/km CO2 or 259 g/km (14.7 oz/mile) CO2e
  • Long-distance flights: 113 g/km CO2 or 114 g/km (6.5 oz/mile) CO2e

Buildings and construction

[edit]
CO2 emissions by fuel type (as of 2023)[147]
  1. coal (41.0%)
  2. oil (32.0%)
  3. gas (21.0%)
  4. cement (4.00%)
  5. others (2.00%)

In 2018, manufacturing construction materials and maintaining buildings accounted for 39% of carbon dioxide emissions from energy and process-related emissions. Manufacture of glass, cement, and steel accounted for 11% of energy and process-related emissions.[148] Because building construction is a significant investment, more than two-thirds of buildings in existence will still exist in 2050.Retrofitting existing buildings to become more efficient will be necessary to meet the targets of the Paris Agreement; it will be insufficient to only apply low-emission standards to new construction.[149] Buildings that produce as much energy as they consume are calledzero-energy buildings, while buildings that produce more than they consume areenergy-plus.Low-energy buildings are designed to be highly efficient with low total energy consumption and carbon emissions—a popular type is thepassive house.[148]

The construction industry has seen marked advances in building performance and energy efficiency over recent decades.[150]Green building practices that avoid emissions or capture the carbon already present in the environment, allow for reduced footprint of the construction industry, for example, use ofhempcrete,cellulose fiber insulation, andlandscaping.[151]

In 2019, the building sector was responsible for 12 GtCO2-eq emissions. More than 95% of these emissions were carbon, and the remaining 5% were CH4,N2O, and halocarbon.[152]

The largest contributor to building sector emissions (49% of total) is the production of electricity for use in buildings.[153]

Of global building sector GHG emissions, 28% are produced during the manufacturing process of building materials such assteel,cement (a key component ofconcrete),[154] and glass.[153] The conventional process inherently related to the production of steel and cement results in large amounts of CO2 emitted. For example, the production of steel in 2018 was responsible for 7 to 9% of the global CO2 emissions.[155]

The remaining 23% of global building sector GHG emissions are produced directly on site during building operations.[153]

Embodied carbon emissions in construction sector

[edit]

Embodied carbon emissions, or upfront carbon emissions (UCE), are the result of creating and maintaining the materials that form a building.[156] As of 2018, "Embodied carbon is responsible 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions and 28% of global building sector emissions ... Embodied carbon will be responsible for almost half of total new construction emissions between now and 2050."[157]

GHG emissions which are produced during the mining, processing, manufacturing, transportation and installation of building materials are referred to as theembodied carbon of a material.[158] The embodied carbon of a construction project can be reduced by using low-carbon materials for building structures and finishes, reducing demolition, and reusing buildings and construction materials whenever possible.[153]

Industrial processes

[edit]
See also:Environmental impact of concrete § Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change

As of 2020[update]Secunda CTL is the world's largest single emitter, at 56.5 million tonnes CO2 a year.[159]

Mining

[edit]

Flaring and venting ofnatural gas in oil wells is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions. Its contribution to greenhouse gases has declined by three-quarters in absolute terms since a peak in the 1970s of approximately 110 million metric tons/year, and in 2004 accounted for about 1/2 of one percent of all anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions.[160]

TheWorld Bank estimates that 134 billion cubic meters of natural gas are flared or vented annually (2010 datum), an amount equivalent to the combined annual gas consumption ofGermany andFrance or enough to supply the entire world with gas for 16 days. This flaring is highly concentrated: 10 countries account for 70% of emissions, and twenty for 85%.[161]

Steel and aluminum

[edit]

Steel and aluminum are key economic sectors where CO2 is produced. According to a 2013 study, "in 2004, the steel industry along emits about 590M tons of CO2, which accounts for 5.2% of the global anthropogenic GHG emissions. CO2 emitted from steel production primarily comes from energy consumption of fossil fuel as well as the use oflimestone to purifyiron oxides."[162]

More recent estimates suggest that global steel production emitted around 2,280 million tons of CO2 in 2017, indicating the scale has increased significantly. A 2022 study found that across bulk material sectors—steel, aluminum, cement, and paper—total emissions reached approximately 8.4 billion tons of CO2 equivalent.[163]

Plastics

[edit]

Plastics are produced mainly from fossil fuels. It was estimated that between 3% and 4% of global GHG emissions are associated with plastics' life cycles.[164] The EPA estimates[165] as many as five mass units of carbon dioxide are emitted for each mass unit ofpolyethylene terephthalate (PET) produced—the type of plastic most commonly used for beverage bottles,[166] the transportation produce greenhouse gases also.[167]Plastic waste emits carbon dioxide when it degrades. In 2018 research claimed that some of the most common plastics in the environment release the greenhouse gases methane andethylene when exposed to sunlight in an amount that can affect the earth climate.[168][169]

Due to the lightness of plastic versus glass or metal, plastic may reduce energy consumption. For example, packaging beverages in PET plastic rather than glass or metal is estimated to save 52% in transportation energy, if the glass or metal package issingle-use, of course.

In 2019 a new report "Plastic and Climate" was published. According to the report, the production and incineration of plastics will contribute in the equivalent of 850 million tonnes ofcarbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere in 2019. With the current trend, annual life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of plastics will grow to 1.34 billion tonnes by 2030. By 2050, the life cycle emissions of plastics could reach 56 billion tonnes, as much as 14 percent of the Earth's remainingcarbon budget.[170] The report says that only solutions which involve areduction in consumption can solve the problem, while others like biodegradable plastic, ocean cleanup, using renewable energy in plastic industry can do little, and in some cases may even worsen it.[171]

Pulp and paper

[edit]
Further information:Environmental effects of paper § Greenhouse gas emissions

The global print and paper industry accounts for about 1% of global carbon dioxide emissions.[172] Greenhouse gas emissions from thepulp and paper industry are generated from the combustion of fossil fuels required for raw material production and transportation, wastewater treatment facilities, purchased power, paper transportation, printed product transportation, disposal and recycling.

Various services

[edit]

Digital services

[edit]
See also:Streaming media § Greenhouse gas emissions,Data center § Greenhouse gas emissions, andCryptocurrency § Environmental effects

In 2020,data centers (excluding cryptocurrency mining) and data transmission each used about 1% of world electricity.[173] Thedigital sector produces between 2% and 4% of global GHG emissions,[174] a large part of which is fromchipmaking.[175] However the sector reduces emissions from other sectors which have a larger global share, such as transport of people,[176] and possibly buildings and industry.[177]

Mining forproof-of-workcryptocurrencies requires enormous amounts of electricity and consequently comes with a largecarbon footprint.[178] Proof-of-work blockchains such asBitcoin,Ethereum,Litecoin, andMonero were estimated to have added between 3 million and 15 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere in the period from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017.[179] By the end of 2021, Bitcoin was estimated to produce 65.4 million tonnes of CO2, as much asGreece,[180] and consume between 91 and 177 terawatt-hours annually (0.3% to 0.6% of world electricity). Bitcoin is the least energy-efficient cryptocurrency, using 707.6 kilowatt-hours of electricity per transaction.[181][182][183]

A study in 2015 investigated the global electricity usage that can be ascribed toCommunication Technology (CT) between 2010 and 2030. Electricity usage from CT was divided into four principle categories: (i) consumer devices, including personal computers, mobile phones, TVs and home entertainment systems; (ii) network infrastructure; (iii) data center computation and storage; and lastly (iv) production of the above categories. The study estimated for the worst-case scenario, that CT electricity usage could contribute up to 23% of the globally released greenhouse gas emissions in 2030.[184]

Health care

[edit]

The healthcare sector produces 4.4–4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[185]

Based on the 2013 life cycle emissions in the health care sector, it is estimated that the GHG emissions associated with US health care activities may cause an additional 123,000 to 381,000 DALYs annually.[186]

Water supply and sanitation

[edit]
This section is an excerpt fromWASH § Reducing greenhouse gas emissions.[edit]
Solutions exist to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of water and sanitation services.[187] These solutions into three categories which partly overlap: Firstly "reducing water and energy consumption through lean and efficient approaches"; secondly "embracingcircular economy to produce energy and valuable products"; and thirdly by "planning to reduce GHG emissions through strategic decisions".[188]: 28  The mentionedlean and efficient approaches include for example finding ways to reduce water loss from water networks and to reduce infiltration of rainwater or groundwater into sewers.[188]: 29  Also, incentives can to encourage households and industries toreduce their water consumption and their energy requirements forwater heating.[188]: 31  There is another method to reduce the energy requirements for the treatment of raw water to make drinking water out of it: protecting the quality of the source water better.[188]: 32 

Tourism

[edit]

According to UNEP, global tourism is a significant contributor to the increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, with air travel accounting for a substantial share of tourism's carbon footprint—up to 70% in some countries like Iceland.[189][190]

Recent studies show that tourism produces around 1 kg of CO2 per dollar spent—about 25% higher than the global economic average—highlighting its substantial carbon intensity.[190]

Banking

[edit]

Banks' financed emissions - the greenhouse gas emissions linked to the investment and lending activities offinancial institutions - represent around 75% of their carbon footprint.[191] TheNetwork for Greening the Financial System estimates that climate disasters could dent global economic growth up to 3% in the next five years,[192] and that the financial sector could play a key role in mitigating the risks of climate change.[192]

TheNet-Zero Banking Alliance has created guidelines for climate target setting for banks,[193] while the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials is developing a harmonized approach to assess and disclose the greenhouse gas emissions associated with financial institutions' loans and investments.[194]

Emissions by other characteristics

[edit]

The responsibility for anthropogenic climate change differs substantially among individuals, e.g. between groups orcohorts.

By type of energy source

[edit]
Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electricity supply technologies, median values calculated byIPCC[195]
This section is an excerpt fromLife-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of energy sources.[edit]

Greenhouse gas emissions are one of theenvironmental impacts of electricity generation. Measurement oflife-cycle greenhouse gas emissions involves calculating theglobal warming potential (GWP) of energy sources throughlife-cycle assessment. These are usually sources of only electrical energy but sometimes sources of heat are evaluated.[196] The findings are presented in units of global warming potential per unit of electrical energy generated by that source. The scale uses the global warming potential unit, thecarbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), and the unit of electrical energy, thekilowatt hour (kWh). The goal of such assessments is to cover the full life of the source, from material and fuel mining through construction to operation and waste management.

In 2014, theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change harmonized thecarbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) findings of the major electricity generating sources in use worldwide. This was done by analyzing the findings of hundreds of individual scientific papers assessing each energy source.[197]Coal is by far the worst emitter, followed bynatural gas, with solar, wind and nuclear all low-carbon. Hydropower, biomass, geothermal and ocean power may generally be low-carbon, but poor design or other factors could result in higher emissions from individual power stations.

By socio-economic class and age

[edit]
This pie chart illustrates both total emissions for each income group, and emissionsper person within each income group. For example, the 10% with the highest incomes are responsible for half of carbon emissions, and its members emit an average of more than five times as muchper person as members of the lowest half of the income scale.[198]
Though total CO2 emissions (size of pie charts) differ substantially among high-emitting regions, the pattern of higher income classes emitting more than lower income classes is consistent across regions.[199] The world's top 1% of emitters emit over 1000 times more than the bottom 1%.[199]

Fueled by theconsumptive lifestyle ofwealthy people, the wealthiest 5% of the global population has been responsible for 37% of the absolute increase in greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. It can be seen that there is a strong relationship between income and per capita carbon dioxide emissions.[51] Almost half of the increase in absolute global emissions has been caused by the richest 10% of the population.[200] In the newest report from the IPCC 2022, it states that the lifestyle consumptions of the poor and middle class in emerging economies produce approximately 5–50 times less the amount that the high class in already developed high-income countries.[201][202] Variations in regional, and national per capita emissions partly reflect different development stages, but they also vary widely at similar income levels. The 10% of households with the highest per capita emissions contribute a disproportionately large share of global household greenhouse gas emissions.[202]

Studies find that the most affluent citizens of the world are responsible for mostenvironmental impacts, and robust action by them is necessary for prospects of moving towards safer environmental conditions.[203][204]

According to a 2020 report byOxfam and theStockholm Environment Institute,[205][206] the richest 1% of the global population have caused twice as much carbon emissions as the poorest 50% over the 25 years from 1990 to 2015.[207][208][209] This was, respectively, during that period, 15% of cumulative emissions compared to 7%.[210] The bottom half of the population is directly responsible for less than 20% of energy footprints and consume less than the top 5% in terms of trade-corrected energy. The largest disproportionality was identified to be in the domain of transport, where e.g. the top 10% consume 56% of vehicle fuel and conduct 70% of vehicle purchases.[211] However, wealthy individuals are also oftenshareholders and typically have more influence[212] and, especially in the case ofbillionaires, may also direct lobbying efforts, direct financial decisions, and/or control companies.

Based on a study in 32 developed countries, researchers found that "seniors in the United States and Australia have the highest per capita footprint, twice the Western average. The trend is mainly due to changes in expenditure patterns of seniors".[213]

Methods for reducing greenhouse gas emissions

[edit]
See also:Methane emissions § Approaches to reduce emissions

Governments have taken action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions tomitigate climate change. Countries and regions listed in Annex I of theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (i.e., the OECD and former planned economies of the Soviet Union) are required to submit periodic assessments to the UNFCCC of actions they are taking to address climate change.[214]: 3  Policies implemented by governments include for example national and regional targets to reduce emissions, promotingenergy efficiency, and support for anenergy transition.

These paragraphs are an excerpt fromClimate change mitigation.[edit]

Climate change mitigation (or decarbonisation) is action to limit thegreenhouse gases in the atmosphere that causeclimate change. Climate change mitigation actions includeconserving energy andreplacing fossil fuels withclean energy sources. Secondary mitigation strategies include changes to land use andremoving carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere.[215][216] Recent assessments emphasize that global greenhouse gas emissions must peak before 2025 and decline by about 43% by 2030 to limit warming to 1.5 °C, requiring rapid transitions in energy, transport, and land-use systems.[217] Current climate change mitigation policies are insufficient as they would still result in global warming of about 2.7 °C by 2100,[218] significantly above the 2015Paris Agreement's[219] goal of limiting global warming to below 2 °C.[220][221]

Solar energy andwind power can replace fossil fuels at the lowest cost compared to otherrenewable energy options.[222] The availability of sunshine and wind is variable and can requireelectrical grid upgrades, such as usinglong-distance electricity transmission to group a range of power sources.[223]Energy storage can also be used to even out power output, anddemand management can limit power use when power generation is low. Cleanly generatedelectricity can usually replace fossil fuels for powering transportation, heating buildings, and running industrial processes.[224] Certain processes are more difficult to decarbonise, such asair travel andcement production.Carbon capture and storage (CCS) can be an option to reduce net emissions in these circumstances, although fossil fuel power plants with CCS technology is currently a high-cost climate change mitigation strategy.[225][226][227]

Projections for future emissions

[edit]
Historical and future temperature projections showing importance of mitigating short-lived climate pollutants like methane
See also:Carbon budget andClimate change scenario

In October 2023, the USEnergy Information Administration (EIA) released a series of projections out to 2050 based on current ascertainable policy interventions.[228][229][230] Unlike many integratedsystems models in this field, emissions are allowed to float rather than be pinned tonet‑zero in 2050. A sensitivity analysis varied key parameters, primarily future GDP growth (2.6% pa as reference, variously 1.8% and 3.4%) and secondarilytechnological learning rates, futurecrude oil prices, and similarexogenous inputs. The model results are far from encouraging. In no case did aggregate energy-related carbon emissions ever dip below 2022 levels (see figure 3 plot). The IEO2023 exploration provides a benchmark and suggests that far stronger action is needed.

This section is an excerpt fromClimate change mitigation § Needed emissions cuts.[edit]
icon
This sectionmay incorporate text from alarge language model. It may includehallucinated information,copyright violations, claims notverified in cited sources,original research, orfictitious references. Any such material should beremoved, and content with anunencyclopedic tone should be rewritten.(October 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The annual "Emissions Gap Report" byUNEP stated in 2022 that it was necessary to almost halve emissions. "To get on track for limiting global warming to 1.5°C, global annual GHG emissions must be reduced by 45 per cent compared with emissions projections under policies currently in place in just eight years, and they must continue to decline rapidly after 2030, to avoid exhausting the limited remaining atmosphericcarbon budget."[231]: xvi  The report commented that the world should focus on broad-based economy-wide transformations and not incremental change.[231]: xvi 

In 2022, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released itsSixth Assessment Report on climate change. It warned that greenhouse gas emissions must peak before 2025 at the latest and decline 43% by 2030 to have a good chance of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C (2.7 °F).[232][233] Or in the words of Secretary-General of the United NationsAntónio Guterres: "Main emitters must drastically cut emissions starting this year".[234]

A 2023 synthesis by leading climate scientists highlighted ten critical areas in climate science with significant policy implications. These include the near inevitability of temporarily exceeding the 1.5 °C warming limit, the urgent need for a rapid and managed fossil fuel phase-out, challenges in scaling carbon dioxide removal technologies, uncertainties regarding the future contribution of natural carbon sinks, and the interconnected crises of biodiversity loss and climate change. These insights underscore the necessity for immediate and comprehensive mitigation strategies to address the multifaceted challenges of climate change.[235]

By country

[edit]
Globalcarbon dioxide emissions by country in 2023:[236]
  1. China (34.0%)
  2. United States (12.0%)
  3. India (7.60%)
  4. European Union (6.40%)
  5. Russia (5.30%)
  6. Japan (2.40%)
  7. Iran (2.00%)
  8. Other (30.3%)

In 2023, China, the United States, India, EU, Russia, Japan, and Iran - the world's largest CO2 emitters - together accounted for 69.7% of total global fossil CO2 emissions.[236]

List of countries

[edit]
See also:List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions,List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita,List of countries by greenhouse gas emissions, andList of countries by greenhouse gas emissions per capita
List of countries by carbon emissions[237]
Location% of
global
total
Fossil emissions
(1,000,000 tons per year)
% change
from 2000
20232000
 World100%39,023.9425,725.44Negative increase +52%
China34.0%13,259.643,666.95Negative increase +262%
United States12.0%4,682.045,928.97Positive decrease −21%
India7.6%2,955.18995.65Negative increase +197%
European Union6.4%2,512.073,563.26Positive decrease −30%
Russia5.3%2,069.501,681.14Negative increase +23%
Japan2.4%944.761,248.81Positive decrease −24%
Iran2.0%778.80353.93Negative increase +120%
 International Shipping1.8%706.32503.29Negative increase +40%
Indonesia1.7%674.54299.09Negative increase +126%
Saudi Arabia1.6%622.91265.24Negative increase +135%
Germany1.5%582.95871.74Positive decrease −33%
Canada1.5%575.01543.04Negative increase +6%
South Korea1.5%573.54474.16Negative increase +21%
 International Aviation1.3%491.63355.32Negative increase +38%
Mexico1.2%487.09396.71Negative increase +23%
Brazil1.2%479.50349.40Negative increase +37%
Turkey1.1%438.32227.05Negative increase +93%
South Africa1.0%397.37347.30Negative increase +14%
Australia1.0%373.62353.87Negative increase +6%
Vietnam1.0%372.9556.52Negative increase +560%
Italy,San Marino andVatican City0.8%305.49454.72Positive decrease −33%
United Kingdom0.8%302.10551.68Positive decrease −45%
Poland0.7%286.91313.02Positive decrease −8%
Malaysia0.7%283.32130.78Negative increase +117%
France andMonaco0.7%282.43401.21Positive decrease −30%
Taiwan0.7%279.85238.02Negative increase +18%
Thailand0.7%274.16174.82Negative increase +57%
Egypt0.6%249.33127.91Negative increase +95%
Kazakhstan0.6%239.87132.22Negative increase +81%
Spain andAndorra0.6%217.26313.24Positive decrease −31%
United Arab Emirates0.5%205.9988.46Negative increase +133%
Pakistan0.5%200.51111.87Negative increase +79%
Iraq0.5%192.9188.81Negative increase +117%
Argentina0.5%183.78136.76Negative increase +34%
Algeria0.5%180.3687.94Negative increase +105%
Philippines0.4%161.2974.25Negative increase +117%
Uzbekistan0.4%137.90130.67Negative increase +6%
Ukraine0.3%136.20360.02Positive decrease −62%
Nigeria0.3%127.94100.30Negative increase +28%
Qatar0.3%127.9131.75Negative increase +303%
Bangladesh0.3%124.7926.97Negative increase +363%
Netherlands0.3%122.87176.91Positive decrease −31%
Kuwait0.3%111.6354.48Negative increase +105%
Colombia0.3%100.8662.57Negative increase +61%
Oman0.2%93.0926.32Negative increase +254%
Czech Republic0.2%90.51132.31Positive decrease −32%
Venezuela0.2%84.60137.75Positive decrease −39%
Belgium0.2%84.31124.97Positive decrease −33%
Chile0.2%84.0053.85Negative increase +56%
Romania0.2%70.7797.42Positive decrease −27%
Morocco0.2%69.8633.56Negative increase +108%
Turkmenistan0.2%65.9939.34Negative increase +68%
North Korea0.2%64.2773.81Positive decrease −13%
Libya0.2%61.2649.28Negative increase +24%
Israel andPalestine0.2%61.2559.30Negative increase +3%
Austria0.2%58.8266.69Positive decrease −12%
Peru0.1%58.4028.98Negative increase +102%
Singapore0.1%57.0745.52Negative increase +25%
Serbia andMontenegro0.1%56.1250.64Negative increase +11%
Belarus0.1%54.1856.26Positive decrease −4%
Greece0.1%51.6796.05Positive decrease −46%
Ecuador0.1%45.3322.04Negative increase +106%
Norway0.1%44.0741.77Negative increase +5%
Hungary0.1%43.8359.48Positive decrease −26%
Azerbaijan0.1%42.7728.79Negative increase +49%
Bulgaria0.1%39.7948.17Positive decrease −17%
Bahrain0.1%37.4317.77Negative increase +111%
Portugal0.09%36.1764.41Positive decrease −44%
New Zealand0.09%35.8032.89Negative increase +9%
Sweden0.09%35.3957.98Positive decrease −39%
Slovakia0.09%34.8641.68Positive decrease −16%
Hong Kong0.09%34.6741.90Positive decrease −17%
 Switzerland andLiechtenstein0.09%34.2244.80Positive decrease −24%
Myanmar0.09%33.3710.04Negative increase +232%
Ireland0.08%32.4843.82Positive decrease −26%
Finland0.08%32.2757.53Positive decrease −44%
Tunisia0.08%31.5021.13Negative increase +49%
Dominican Republic0.08%31.3519.01Negative increase +65%
Angola0.07%28.2316.51Negative increase +71%
Mongolia0.07%28.129.04Negative increase +211%
Trinidad and Tobago0.07%27.2219.13Negative increase +42%
Denmark0.07%26.7753.16Positive decrease −50%
Laos0.07%26.020.93Negative increase+2,685
Syria0.07%25.5945.90Positive decrease −44%
Ghana0.06%24.166.09Negative increase +297%
Bolivia0.06%23.818.20Negative increase +190%
Jordan0.06%23.5816.47Negative increase +43%
Cuba0.06%22.0728.99Positive decrease −24%
Bosnia and Herzegovina0.06%22.0014.28Negative increase +54%
Kenya0.06%21.738.91Negative increase +144%
Guatemala0.05%21.359.69Negative increase +120%
Sudan andSouth Sudan0.05%21.276.00Negative increase +255%
Sri Lanka0.05%20.5211.46Negative increase +79%
Tanzania0.05%19.373.11Negative increase +523%
Cambodia0.05%17.972.00Negative increase +798%
  Nepal0.05%17.933.42Negative increase +424%
Croatia0.04%17.4619.37Positive decrease −10%
Lebanon0.04%17.3315.31Negative increase +13%
Ethiopia0.04%16.713.88Negative increase +331%
Panama0.04%14.725.19Negative increase +184%
Ivory Coast0.04%14.416.97Negative increase +107%
Puerto Rico0.04%13.8225.18Positive decrease −45%
Lithuania0.03%13.1111.66Negative increase +13%
Georgia0.03%12.865.21Negative increase +147%
Slovenia0.03%12.0815.04Positive decrease −20%
Senegal0.03%12.023.99Negative increase +201%
Zimbabwe0.03%11.7414.60Positive decrease −20%
Estonia0.03%11.4417.38Positive decrease −34%
Honduras0.03%10.955.00Negative increase +119%
Yemen0.03%10.9015.74Positive decrease −31%
Cameroon0.03%10.765.73Negative increase +88%
Kyrgyzstan0.03%10.464.80Negative increase +118%
Moldova0.03%9.936.89Negative increase +44%
Mozambique0.02%9.741.57Negative increase +520%
Brunei0.02%9.726.07Negative increase +60%
Tajikistan0.02%9.312.78Negative increase +234%
Uruguay0.02%8.825.57Negative increase +58%
North Macedonia0.02%8.769.04Positive decrease −3%
Afghanistan0.02%8.711.02Negative increase +757%
Costa Rica0.02%8.575.12Negative increase +67%
El Salvador0.02%8.385.80Negative increase +45%
Paraguay0.02%8.253.64Negative increase +127%
Zambia0.02%8.061.95Negative increase +313%
Armenia0.02%7.733.57Negative increase +116%
Botswana0.02%7.424.10Negative increase +81%
Congo0.02%7.254.51Negative increase +61%
Uganda0.02%7.221.41Negative increase +411%
Cyprus0.02%7.187.13Negative increase +1%
Luxembourg0.02%7.018.80Positive decrease −20%
Jamaica0.02%6.8610.21Positive decrease −33%
Mali0.02%6.660.80Negative increase +730%
Latvia0.02%6.557.23Positive decrease −9%
Malawi0.02%6.453.10Negative increase +108%
Benin0.02%6.441.54Negative increase +317%
New Caledonia0.02%6.212.18Negative increase +185%
Burkina Faso0.02%6.000.88Negative increase +583%
Papua New Guinea0.02%5.952.95Negative increase +102%
Nicaragua0.01%5.733.77Negative increase +52%
Gabon0.01%4.936.60Positive decrease −25%
Mauritania0.01%4.651.07Negative increase +336%
Albania0.01%4.593.23Negative increase +42%
Namibia0.01%4.361.95Negative increase +124%
Mauritius0.01%4.212.44Negative increase +73%
Madagascar0.01%4.101.69Negative increase +142%
Democratic Republic of the Congo0.01%3.801.88Negative increase +102%
Equatorial Guinea0.01%3.782.74Negative increase +38%
Guinea0.01%3.721.47Negative increase +153%
Haiti0.009%3.541.69Negative increase +109%
Guyana0.008%3.301.66Negative increase +99%
Iceland0.008%3.092.85Negative increase +8%
Macao0.008%3.011.48Negative increase +104%
Maldives0.007%2.880.64Negative increase +352%
Niger0.007%2.820.70Negative increase +302%
Suriname0.007%2.631.48Negative increase +78%
Chad0.007%2.570.24Negative increase +962%
Réunion0.007%2.572.05Negative increase +25%
Togo0.006%2.491.25Negative increase +99%
Curaçao0.006%2.435.67Positive decrease −57%
Fiji0.006%2.211.46Negative increase +51%
Bhutan0.005%1.990.41Negative increase +388%
Malta0.004%1.682.13Positive decrease −21%
Bahamas0.004%1.681.00Negative increase +69%
Rwanda0.004%1.650.68Negative increase +142%
Liberia0.004%1.640.40Negative increase +307%
Palau0.004%1.442.12Positive decrease −32%
Eswatini0.004%1.391.10Negative increase +27%
French Polynesia0.003%1.260.72Negative increase +75%
Seychelles0.003%1.240.76Negative increase +63%
Guadeloupe0.003%1.170.62Negative increase +89%
Martinique0.003%1.090.67Negative increase +62%
Sierra Leone0.003%1.070.43Negative increase +147%
Cape Verde0.003%1.010.28Negative increase +256%
Lesotho0.002%0.880.35Negative increase +148%
Somalia0.002%0.870.63Negative increase +38%
Burundi0.002%0.840.29Negative increase +186%
Barbados0.002%0.800.59Negative increase +35%
Djibouti0.002%0.750.74Negative increase +1%
East Timor0.002%0.700.23Negative increase +208%
Gibraltar0.002%0.690.34Negative increase +102%
Eritrea0.002%0.670.67Steady no change%
Gambia0.002%0.610.27Negative increase +126%
Greenland0.001%0.580.00Negative increase+43,369
Aruba0.001%0.530.27Negative increase +97%
Samoa0.001%0.470.19Negative increase +149%
Solomon Islands0.001%0.420.24Negative increase +78%
French Guiana0.001%0.380.17Negative increase +119%
Central African Republic0.001%0.370.26Negative increase +43%
Cayman Islands0.001%0.360.13Negative increase +172%
Bermuda0.001%0.350.15Negative increase +133%
Guinea-Bissau0.001%0.350.20Negative increase +71%
Antigua and Barbuda0.001%0.320.14Negative increase +139%
Comoros0.001%0.320.09Negative increase +250%
Saint Lucia0.001%0.300.10Negative increase +207%
Vanuatu0.001%0.290.08Negative increase +238%
Belize0.001%0.280.14Negative increase +101%
Western Sahara0.001%0.260.26Negative increase +4%
Tonga0.001%0.220.10Negative increase +118%
São Tomé and Príncipe0.001%0.210.06Negative increase +288%
Grenada0.0004%0.140.06Negative increase +149%
Cook Islands0.0004%0.140.06Negative increase +133%
Saint Kitts and Nevis0.0003%0.120.05Negative increase +140%
Turks and Caicos Islands0.0003%0.100.02Negative increase +481%
Kiribati0.0002%0.100.03Negative increase +197%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines0.0002%0.100.04Negative increase +131%
Dominica0.0002%0.080.06Negative increase +44%
British Virgin Islands0.0002%0.080.03Negative increase +172%
Saint Pierre and Miquelon0.0001%0.040.02Negative increase +129%
Anguilla0.0001%0.020.02Negative increase +48%
Falkland Islands0.0000%0.020.01Negative increase +170%
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha0.0000%0.020.01Negative increase +58%
Faroe Islands0.0000%0.000.00Negative increase +20%

United States

[edit]
Though the U.S.'sper capita and per GDP emissions have declined significantly, the raw numerical decline in emissions is much less substantial.[238]
These paragraphs are an excerpt fromGreenhouse gas emissions by the United States.[edit]
TheUnited States produced 5.2 billionmetric tons ofcarbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020,[239] the second largest in the world aftergreenhouse gas emissions by China and among thecountries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person. In 2022, the emissions rose to 6.3432 billion metric tons.[240] In 2019 China is estimated to have emitted 27% of worldGHG, followed by the United States with 11%, then India with 6.6%.[241] In total the United States has emitted a quarter of world GHG, more than any other country.[242][243] Annual emissions are over 15 tons per person and, amongst the top eight emitters, is the highestcountry by greenhouse gas emissions per person.[244]

China

[edit]
These paragraphs are an excerpt fromGreenhouse gas emissions by China.[edit]
The total greenhouse gas emissions of thePeople's Republic of China are the world's highest, accounted for 35% of the world's total, in 2023, according to theInternational Energy Agency.

India

[edit]
These paragraphs are an excerpt fromClimate change in India § Greenhouse gas emissions.[edit]

Greenhouse gas emissions byIndia are the third largest in the world and the main source is coal.[245] India emitted 2.8 Gt ofCO2eq in 2016 (2.5 includingLULUCF).[246][247] 79% were CO2, 14% methane and 5%nitrous oxide.[247] India emits about 3 gigatonnes (Gt)CO2eq ofgreenhouse gases each year; about two tons per person,[248] which is half the world average.[249] The country emits 7% of global emissions.[250]

In India in 2023, emissions increased by 190 million tonnes due to strong GDP growth and reducedhydroelectricity production following a weak monsoon, with itsper capita emissions remaining significantly below the global average.[251]

Society and culture

[edit]

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic

[edit]
Main article:Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment § Climate change

In 2020, carbon dioxide emissions fell by 6.4% or 2.3 billion tonnes globally.[252] In April 2020,NOx emissions fell by up to 30%.[253] In China,lockdowns and other measures resulted in a 26% decrease in coal consumption, and a 50% reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions.[254] Greenhouse gas emissions rebounded later in the pandemic as many countries began lifting restrictions, with the direct impact of pandemic policies having a negligible long-term impact on climate change.[252][255]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^● Emissions data source:"Territorial (MtCO2) / 1) Emissions / Carbon emissions / Chart View". Global Carbon Atlas. 2024. (archive on Our World in Data)
    ● Country population data source:"Population, total / All Countries and Economies / Most Recent Value (Thousands)". World Bank. 2024.Archived from the original on 22 January 2025.
  2. ^"Chapter 2: Emissions trends and drivers"(PDF).Ipcc_Ar6_Wgiii. 2022. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2022-04-12. Retrieved2022-04-04.
  3. ^Ritchie, Hannah; Rosado, Pablo; Roser, Max (2023-12-28)."CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions".Our World in Data.
  4. ^"Global Carbon Project (GCP)".www.globalcarbonproject.org. Archived fromthe original on 4 April 2019. Retrieved2019-05-19.
  5. ^abc"Methane vs. Carbon Dioxide: A Greenhouse Gas Showdown".One Green Planet. 30 September 2014. Retrieved13 February 2020.
  6. ^Milman, Oliver (2024-04-06)."Scientists confirm record highs for three most important heat-trapping gases".The Guardian.ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved2024-04-08.
  7. ^abRitchie, Hannah;Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (2020-05-11)."CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions".Our World in Data.
  8. ^Bogmans, Christian (April 10, 2025)."Power Hungry: How AI Will Drive Energy Demand".International Monetary Fund.
  9. ^abwidworld_admin (2021-10-20)."The World #InequalityReport 2022 presents the most up-to-date & complete data on inequality worldwide".World Inequality Report 2022 (in French). Retrieved2023-07-14.
  10. ^ab"Carbon inequality in 2030: Per capita consumption emissions and the 1.5C goal – IEEP AISBL". Retrieved2023-07-14.
  11. ^abGore, Tim (2021-11-05).Carbon Inequality in 2030: Per capita consumption emissions and the 1.5 °C goal. Institute for European Environmental Policy.doi:10.21201/2021.8274.hdl:10546/621305.ISBN 978-1-78748-827-4.S2CID 242037589.
  12. ^ab"AR6 Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change — IPCC". Retrieved2023-07-14.
  13. ^abcGrubb, M. (July–September 2003)."The economics of the Kyoto protocol"(PDF).World Economics.4 (3). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 17 July 2011.
  14. ^"What is a carbon footprint".www.conservation.org. Retrieved2023-05-28.
  15. ^IPCC, 2022:Annex I: GlossaryArchived 13 March 2023 at theWayback Machine [van Diemen, R., J.B.R. Matthews, V. Möller, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C. Méndez, A. Reisinger, S. Semenov (eds)]. In IPCC, 2022:Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeArchived 2 August 2022 at theWayback Machine [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.020
  16. ^ab"Carbon Accounting".Corporate Finance Institute. Retrieved2023-01-06.
  17. ^Burghardt, Kaitlyn; Jamil, Uzair; Pearce, Joshua M. (2025-06-28)."The monetary relationship between carbon emissions and mortality: a review".Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.doi:10.1007/s13412-025-01030-7.ISSN 2190-6491.
  18. ^"Solar Radiation and the Earth's Energy Balance".The Climate System – EESC 2100 Spring 2007. Columbia University. Archived fromthe original on 4 November 2004. Retrieved15 October 2010.
  19. ^Le Treut H, Somerville R, Cubasch U, Ding Y,Mauritzen C, Mokssit A, Peterson T, Prather M (2007)."Historical Overview of Climate Change Science"(PDF). In Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds.).Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 97. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 26 November 2018. Retrieved25 March 2014.
  20. ^"The Elusive Absolute Surface Air Temperature (SAT)".Goddard Institute for Space Studies.NOAA.Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved3 September 2008.
  21. ^"Yearly average temperature".Climate Change Tracker.
  22. ^A concise description of the greenhouse effect is given in theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report, "What is the Greenhouse Effect?"FAQ 1.3 – AR4 WGI Chapter 1: Historical Overview of Climate Change ScienceArchived 5 August 2019 at theWayback Machine, IIPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Chapter 1, page 115: "To balance the absorbed incoming [solar] energy, the Earth must, on average, radiate the same amount of energy back to space. Because the Earth is much colder than the Sun, it radiates at much longer wavelengths, primarily in the infrared part of the spectrum (see Figure 1). Much of this thermal radiation emitted by the land and ocean is absorbed by the atmosphere, including clouds, and reradiated back to Earth. This is called the greenhouse effect."
    Schneider, Stephen H. (2001)."Global Climate Change in the Human Perspective". In Bengtsson, Lennart O.; Hammer, Claus U. (eds.).Geosphere-biosphere Interactions and Climate. Cambridge University Press. pp. 90–91.ISBN 978-0-521-78238-8.Archived from the original on 2 August 2020. Retrieved31 May 2018.
    Claussen, E.; Cochran, V.A.; Davis, D.P., eds. (2001)."Global Climate Data".Climate Change: Science, Strategies, & Solutions. University of Michigan. p. 373.ISBN 978-9004120242.Archived from the original on 18 May 2020. Retrieved1 June 2018.
    Allaby, A.; Allaby, M. (1999).A Dictionary of Earth Sciences. Oxford University Press. p. 244.ISBN 978-0-19-280079-4.
  23. ^Rebecca, Lindsey (14 January 2009)."Climate and Earth's Energy Budget : Feature Articles".earthobservatory.nasa.gov.Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved14 December 2020.
  24. ^Fox, Alex."Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reaches New High Despite Pandemic Emissions Reduction".Smithsonian Magazine.Archived from the original on 10 June 2021. Retrieved22 June 2021.
  25. ^Lindsey, Rebecca; Dahlman, Luann."Climate Change: Global Temperature".NOAA Climate.gov. Archived fromthe original on 15 June 2013.
  26. ^Dhakal, S., J.C. Minx, F.L. Toth, A. Abdel-Aziz, M.J. Figueroa Meza, K. Hubacek, I.G.C. Jonckheere, Yong-Gun Kim, G.F. Nemet, S. Pachauri, X.C. Tan, T. Wiedmann, 2022:Chapter 2: Emissions Trends and Drivers. In IPCC, 2022:Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.004
  27. ^"Water Vapor".earthobservatory.nasa.gov. 2023-06-30. Retrieved2023-08-16.
  28. ^Johnston, Chris; Milman, Oliver; Vidal, John (15 October 2016)."Climate change: global deal reached to limit use of hydrofluorocarbons".The Guardian. Retrieved21 August 2018.
  29. ^"Climate change: 'Monumental' deal to cut HFCs, fastest growing greenhouse gases".BBC News. 15 October 2016. Retrieved15 October 2016.
  30. ^"Nations, Fighting Powerful Refrigerant That Warms Planet, Reach Landmark Deal".The New York Times. 15 October 2016. Retrieved15 October 2016.
  31. ^Vaara, Miska (2003),Use of ozone depleting substances in laboratories, TemaNord, p. 170,ISBN 978-92-893-0884-7, archived fromthe original on 6 August 2011
  32. ^Montreal Protocol
  33. ^ab"NOAA's Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (An Introduction)". NOAA. 2020. Retrieved2 November 2023.
  34. ^Fox, Alex."Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reaches New High Despite Pandemic Emissions Reduction".Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved22 June 2021.
  35. ^"Executive Summary – CO2 Emissions in 2023 – Analysis".IEA. Retrieved2024-03-30.
  36. ^"It's critical to tackle coal emissions – Analysis".IEA. 8 October 2021. Retrieved9 October 2021.
  37. ^US EPA, OAR (12 January 2016)."Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data".www.epa.gov. Archived fromthe original on January 25, 2017. Retrieved13 September 2021.
  38. ^Steinfeld, H.; Gerber, P.; Wassenaar, T.; Castel, V.; Rosales, M.; de Haan, C. (2006).Livestock's long shadow (Report). FAO Livestock, Environment and Development (LEAD) Initiative.
  39. ^Ciais, Phillipe; Sabine, Christopher; et al."Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles"(PDF). In Stocker Thomas F.; et al. (eds.).Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. IPCC. p. 473.
  40. ^Chrobak, Ula (14 May 2021)."Fighting climate change means taking laughing gas seriously".Knowable Magazine.doi:10.1146/knowable-051321-2.S2CID 236555111. Retrieved8 March 2022.
  41. ^"Global Methane Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities"(PDF).Global Methane Initiative. 2020.
  42. ^"Sources of methane emissions".International Energy Agency. 20 August 2020.
  43. ^"Key facts and findings".Fao.org. Food and Agricultural Organization. n.d. Archived fromthe original on 10 October 2023. Retrieved25 October 2022.
  44. ^abcFriedlingstein, Pierre; O'Sullivan, Michael; Jones, Matthew W.; Anddrew, Robbie M.; et al. (11 November 2022)."Global Carbon Budget 2022 (Data description paper)".Earth System Science Data.14 (11):4811–4900.Bibcode:2022ESSD...14.4811F.doi:10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022.hdl:20.500.11850/594889. Data available for download at Our World in Data (cumulative andannual andper capita).
  45. ^Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (11 May 2020)."Greenhouse gas emissions".Our World in Data. Retrieved22 June 2021.
  46. ^PBL (21 December 2020)."Trends in Global CO2 and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions; 2020 Report".PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Retrieved8 September 2021.
  47. ^IPCC (2019)."Summary for Policy Makers"(PDF).IPCC: 99. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2022-08-07. Retrieved2022-04-04.
  48. ^Dodman, David (April 2009)."Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories".Environment and Urbanization.21 (1):185–201.Bibcode:2009EnUrb..21..185D.doi:10.1177/0956247809103016.ISSN 0956-2478.S2CID 154669383.
  49. ^"Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study says".The Guardian. 10 July 2017. Retrieved9 April 2021.
  50. ^Gustin, Georgina (9 July 2017)."25 Fossil Fuel Producers Responsible for Half Global Emissions in Past 3 Decades".Inside Climate News. Retrieved4 May 2021.
  51. ^abcdRitchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (2020-05-11)."CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions".Our World in Data.
  52. ^ab"Global CO2 emissions: annual increase halves in 2008". Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) website. 25 June 2009. Archived fromthe original on 19 December 2010. Retrieved5 May 2010.
  53. ^"Global Carbon Mechanisms: Emerging lessons and implications (CTC748)". Carbon Trust. March 2009. p. 24. Retrieved31 March 2010.
  54. ^Vaughan, Adam (7 December 2015)."Global emissions to fall for first time during a period of economic growth".The Guardian.ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved23 December 2016.
  55. ^Stevens, Harry (1 March 2023)."The United States has caused the most global warming. When will China pass it?".The Washington Post.Archived from the original on 1 March 2023.
  56. ^abBader, N.; Bleichwitz, R. (2009)."Measuring urban greenhouse gas emissions: The challenge of comparability".S.A.P.I.EN.S.2 (3). Retrieved11 September 2011.
  57. ^"Transcript: The Path Forward: Al Gore on Climate and the Economy".Washington Post.ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved6 May 2021.
  58. ^abcdefgBanuri, T. (1996).Equity and social considerations. In: Climate change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (J.P. Bruce et al. Eds.). This version: Printed by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, and New York. PDF version: IPCC website.ISBN 978-0-521-56854-8.
  59. ^World energy outlook 2007 edition – China and India insights. International Energy Agency (IEA), Head of Communication and Information Office, 9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France. 2007. p. 600.ISBN 978-92-64-02730-5. Archived fromthe original on 15 June 2010. Retrieved4 May 2010.
  60. ^Fig. SPM.2c fromWorking Group III (4 April 2022).Climate Change 2022 / Mitigation of Climate Change / Summary for Policymakers(PDF). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. p. 10.ISBN 978-92-9169-160-9.Archived(PDF) from the original on 22 July 2023. GDP data is for 2019.
  61. ^Holtz-Eakin, D. (1995)."Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth"(PDF).Journal of Public Economics.57 (1):85–101.doi:10.1016/0047-2727(94)01449-X.S2CID 152513329.
  62. ^"Selected Development Indicators"(PDF).World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change(PDF). Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. 2010. Tables A1 and A2.doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7987-5.ISBN 978-0-8213-7987-5.
  63. ^Helm, D.; et al. (10 December 2007).Too Good To Be True? The UK's Climate Change Record(PDF). p. 3. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 15 July 2011.
  64. ^abcWorld Energy Outlook 2009(PDF), Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA), 2009, pp. 179–80,ISBN 978-92-64-06130-9, archived fromthe original(PDF) on 24 September 2015, retrieved27 December 2011
  65. ^abDavis, S.J.; K. Caldeira (8 March 2010)."Consumption-based Accounting of CO2 Emissions"(PDF).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.107 (12):5687–5692.Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.5687D.doi:10.1073/pnas.0906974107.PMC 2851800.PMID 20212122. Retrieved18 April 2011.
  66. ^"Emissions from fuels used for international aviation and maritime transport".UNFCCC. Retrieved2023-06-11.
  67. ^Tukker, Arnold; Pollitt, Hector; Henkemans, Maurits (2020-04-22)."Consumption-based carbon accounting: sense and sensibility".Climate Policy.20 (sup1):S1 –S13.Bibcode:2020CliPo..20S...1T.doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1728208.hdl:1887/3135062.ISSN 1469-3062.S2CID 214525354.
  68. ^Herzog, T. (November 2006). Yamashita, M.B. (ed.).Target: intensity – an analysis of greenhouse gas intensity targets(PDF). World Resources Institute.ISBN 978-1-56973-638-8. Retrieved11 April 2011.
  69. ^Gore, Al (12 December 2020)."Opinion | Al Gore: Where I Find Hope".The New York Times.ISSN 0362-4331.Archived from the original on 18 August 2021. Retrieved10 July 2021.
  70. ^"Climate TRACE to track real-time global carbon emissions".Yale Climate Connections. 17 August 2020.Archived from the original on 12 July 2021. Retrieved10 July 2021.
  71. ^Freedman, Andrew."Al Gore's Climate TRACE tracking group finds vast undercounts of emissions".Axios.Archived from the original on 27 September 2021. Retrieved27 September 2021.
  72. ^Roberts, David (16 July 2020)."The entire world's carbon emissions will finally be trackable in real time".Vox.Archived from the original on 10 July 2021. Retrieved10 July 2021.
  73. ^"Methane: A Threat to People and Planet".Rocky Mountain Institute. 7 July 2021.Archived from the original on 10 July 2021. Retrieved10 July 2021.
  74. ^"Transcript: The Path Forward: Al Gore on Climate and the Economy".The Washington Post.ISSN 0190-8286.Archived from the original on 25 April 2021. Retrieved10 July 2021.
  75. ^Puko, Timothy (13 April 2021)."John Kerry Says U.S. Will Hold China to Account on Climate Pledges".The Wall Street Journal.ISSN 0099-9660.Archived from the original on 10 July 2021. Retrieved10 July 2021.
  76. ^Peters, Adele (15 July 2020)."This Al Gore-supported project uses AI to track the world's emissions in near real time".Fast Company.Archived from the original on 12 May 2021. Retrieved15 July 2021.
  77. ^Botzen, W.J.W.; et al. (2008). "Cumulative CO2 emissions: shifting international responsibilities for climate debt".Climate Policy.8 (6): 570.Bibcode:2008CliPo...8..569B.doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0539.S2CID 153972794.
  78. ^Buis, Alan (Oct 19, 2019)."The Atmosphere: Getting a Handle on Carbon Dioxide".Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Retrieved2023-07-14.
  79. ^"Methane and climate change – Global Methane Tracker 2022 – Analysis".IEA. Retrieved2023-07-14.
  80. ^Prather, Michael J.; Hsu, Juno; DeLuca, Nicole M.; Jackman, Charles H.; Oman, Luke D.; Douglass, Anne R.; Fleming, Eric L.; Strahan, Susan E.; Steenrod, Stephen D.; Søvde, O. Amund; Isaksen, Ivar S. A.; Froidevaux, Lucien; Funke, Bernd (2015-06-16)."Measuring and modeling the lifetime of nitrous oxide including its variability".Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.120 (11):5693–5705.Bibcode:2015JGRD..120.5693P.doi:10.1002/2015JD023267.ISSN 2169-897X.PMC 4744722.PMID 26900537.
  81. ^"Climate Watch - Historical Emissions Data". World Resources Institute. Retrieved23 October 2021.
  82. ^abcHöhne, N.; et al. (24 September 2010)."Contributions of individual countries' emissions to climate change and their uncertainty"(PDF).Climatic Change.106 (3):359–91.doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9930-6.S2CID 59149563. Archived from the original on 26 April 2012.
  83. ^Specktor, Brandon (1 October 2019)."Humans Are Disturbing Earth's Carbon Cycle More Than the Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid Did".livescience.com. Retrieved8 July 2021.
  84. ^"Transport emissions".ec.europa.eu. Retrieved18 October 2021.
  85. ^US EPA, OAR (10 September 2015)."Carbon Pollution from Transportation".www.epa.gov. Retrieved18 October 2021.
  86. ^"Rail and waterborne — best for low-carbon motorised transport — European Environment Agency".www.eea.europa.eu. 24 March 2021. Retrieved18 October 2021.
  87. ^"Luxembourg 2020 – Analysis".IEA. 25 March 2020. Retrieved18 October 2021.
  88. ^"Why The Building Sector? – Architecture 2030". Retrieved18 October 2021.
  89. ^"Global Assessment: Urgent steps must be taken to reduce methane emissions this decade".United Nations. 6 May 2021.
  90. ^Raupach, M.R.; et al. (2007)."Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions"(PDF).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.104 (24):10288–93.Bibcode:2007PNAS..10410288R.doi:10.1073/pnas.0700609104.PMC 1876160.PMID 17519334.
  91. ^The cited paper uses the term "start date" instead of "base year".
  92. ^Kühne, Kjell; Bartsch, Nils; Tate, Ryan Driskell; Higson, Julia; Habet, André (2022).""Carbon Bombs" - Mapping key fossil fuel projects"(PDF).Energy Policy.166 112950.Bibcode:2022EnPol.16612950K.doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112950.S2CID 248756651.
  93. ^"Global Carbon Budget - Latest Data". Global Carbon Project. Retrieved2023-06-18.
  94. ^Olivier J.G.J. (2022),Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2021 summary reportArchived 2023-03-08 at theWayback Machine. PBL Netherlands, Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
  95. ^IGSD (2013)."Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCPs)".Institute of Governance and Sustainable Development (IGSD). Archived fromthe original on 2024-01-26. Retrieved2024-08-09.
  96. ^Zaelke, Durwood; Borgford-Parnell, Nathan; Andersen, Stephen; Picolotti, Romina; Clare, Dennis; Sun, Xiaopu; Gabrielle, Danielle (2013)."Primer on Short-Lived Climate Pollutants"(PDF). Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development. p. 3.
  97. ^using 100 yearglobal warming potential from IPCC-AR4
  98. ^Dreyfus, Gabrielle B.; Xu, Yangyang; Shindell, Drew T.; Zaelke, Durwood; Ramanathan, Veerabhadran (31 May 2022)."Mitigating climate disruption in time: A self-consistent approach for avoiding both near-term and long-term global warming".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.119 (22) e2123536119.Bibcode:2022PNAS..11923536D.doi:10.1073/pnas.2123536119.ISSN 0027-8424.PMC 9295773.PMID 35605122.S2CID 249014617.
  99. ^abcdefghijOlivier J.G.J. and Peters J.A.H.W. (2020),Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2020 reportArchived 2022-04-02 at theWayback Machine.PBL NetherlandsArchived 2021-09-09 at theWayback Machine Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
  100. ^Lombrana, Laura Millan; Warren, Hayley; Rathi, Akshat (2020)."Measuring the Carbon-Dioxide Cost of Last Year's Worldwide Wildfires". Bloomberg L.P.
  101. ^Global fire annual emissions(PDF) (Report). Global Fire Emissions Database. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2017-10-10. Retrieved2022-11-10.
  102. ^World Meteorological Organization (January 2019)."Scientific Assessment of ozone Depletion: 2018"(PDF).Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project.58: A3 (see Table A1).
  103. ^Thompson, R.L; Lassaletta, L.; Patra, P.K (2019)."Acceleration of global N2O emissions seen from two decades of atmospheric inversion"(PDF).Nature Climate Change.9 (12). et al.:993–998.Bibcode:2019NatCC...9..993T.doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0613-7.hdl:11250/2646484.S2CID 208302708.
  104. ^"Hydrogen 'twice as powerful a greenhouse gas as previously thought': UK government study". 8 April 2022. Retrieved3 March 2023.
  105. ^Ocko, Illisa; Hamburg, Steven (20 July 2022)."Climate consequences of hydrogen emissions"(PDF).Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.22 (14):9349–9368.Bibcode:2022ACP....22.9349O.doi:10.5194/acp-22-9349-2022.S2CID 250930654. Retrieved25 April 2023.
  106. ^Cooper, Jasmin; Dubey, Luke; Bakkaloglu, Semra; Hawkes, Adam (2022-07-15)."Hydrogen emissions from the hydrogen value chain-emissions profile and impact to global warming".Science of the Total Environment.830 154624.Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83054624C.doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154624.hdl:10044/1/96970.ISSN 0048-9697.PMID 35307429.S2CID 247535630.
  107. ^Bond; et al. (2013)."Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment".J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.118 (11):5380–5552.Bibcode:2013JGRD..118.5380B.doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171.hdl:2027.42/99106.
  108. ^Ramanathan, V.; Carmichael, G. (April 2008). "Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon".Nature Geoscience.1 (4):221–227.Bibcode:2008NatGe...1..221R.doi:10.1038/ngeo156.
  109. ^ab"Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options | UNECE".unece.org. Retrieved2021-11-26.
  110. ^IEA, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018: Highlights (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2018) p.98
  111. ^IEA, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018: Highlights (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2018) p.101
  112. ^Guevara, Marc; Enciso, Santiago; Tena, Carles; Jorba, Oriol; Dellaert, Stijn; Denier van der Gon, Hugo; Pérez García-Pando, Carlos (15 January 2024)."A global catalogue of CO2 emissions and co-emitted species from power plants, including high-resolution vertical and temporal profiles".Earth System Science Data.16 (1):337–373.Bibcode:2024ESSD...16..337G.doi:10.5194/essd-16-337-2024.hdl:2117/405068.
  113. ^"Emissions".www.iea.org. Archived fromthe original on 12 August 2019. Retrieved21 September 2019.
  114. ^"We have too many fossil-fuel power plants to meet climate goals".Environment. 1 July 2019. Archived fromthe original on July 2, 2019. Retrieved21 September 2019.
  115. ^"March: Tracking the decoupling of electricity demand and associated CO2 emissions".www.iea.org. Retrieved21 September 2019.
  116. ^Grant, Don; Zelinka, David; Mitova, Stefania (13 July 2021)."Reducing CO2 emissions by targeting the world's hyper-polluting power plants".Environmental Research Letters.16 (9): 094022.Bibcode:2021ERL....16i4022G.doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac13f1.ISSN 1748-9326.
  117. ^Emission Trends and Drivers, Chap. 2 in "Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change"https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/Archived 2022-08-02 at theWayback Machine
  118. ^ab"CO2 Emissions in 2023 – Analysis".IEA. March 2024. Retrieved2024-03-22.
  119. ^Nabuurs, G-J.; Mrabet, R.; Abu Hatab, A.; Bustamante, M.; et al."Chapter 7: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses (AFOLU)"(PDF).Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. p. 750.doi:10.1017/9781009157926.009..
  120. ^Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006).Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options(PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN.ISBN 978-92-5-105571-7. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 25 June 2008.
  121. ^Section 4.2: Agriculture's current contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, in:HLPE (June 2012).Food security and climate change. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome, Italy:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. pp. 67–69. Archived fromthe original on 12 December 2014.
  122. ^Sarkodie, Samuel A.; Ntiamoah, Evans B.; Li, Dongmei (2019)."Panel heterogeneous distribution analysis of trade and modernized agriculture on CO2 emissions: The role of renewable and fossil fuel energy consumption".Natural Resources Forum.43 (3):135–153.doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12183.ISSN 1477-8947.
  123. ^FAO (2020).Emissions due to agriculture. Global, regional and country trends 2000–2018(PDF) (Report). FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series. Vol. 18. Rome. p. 2.ISSN 2709-0078.
  124. ^Kumar, R.; Singh, R.; Sharma, R. (2023). "Greenhouse gases emission from agricultural soil: A review".Environmental Advances.13 100040.doi:10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100040 (inactive 1 July 2025).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link)
  125. ^"Carbon emissions from fertilizers could be reduced by as much as 80% by 2050".Science Daily. University of Cambridge. Retrieved17 February 2023.
  126. ^"How livestock farming affects the environment".www.downtoearth.org.in. Retrieved2022-02-10.
  127. ^Friel, Sharon; Dangour, Alan D.; Garnett, Tara; et al. (2009). "Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture".The Lancet.374 (9706):2016–2025.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61753-0.PMID 19942280.S2CID 6318195.
  128. ^Ritchie, Hannah (10 March 2020)."The carbon footprint of foods: are differences explained by the impacts of methane?".Our World in Data. Retrieved2023-04-14.
  129. ^abFeng, Yu; Zeng, Zhenzhong; Searchinger, Timothy D.; Ziegler, Alan D.; Wu, Jie; Wang, Dashan; He, Xinyue; Elsen, Paul R.; Ciais, Philippe; Xu, Rongrong; Guo, Zhilin; Peng, Liqing; Tao, Yiheng; Spracklen, Dominick V.; Holden, Joseph; Liu, Xiaoping; Zheng, Yi; Xu, Peng; Chen, Ji; Jiang, Xin; Song, Xiao-Peng; Lakshmi, Venkataraman; Wood, Eric F.; Zheng, Chunmiao (28 February 2022)."Doubling of annual forest carbon loss over the tropics during the early twenty-first century"(PDF).Nature Sustainability.5 (5):444–451.Bibcode:2022NatSu...5..444F.doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00854-3.ISSN 2398-9629.S2CID 247160560.
  130. ^"Deforestation emissions far higher than previously thought, study finds".The Guardian. 28 February 2022. Retrieved16 March 2022.
  131. ^B. Metz; O.R. Davidson; P.R. Bosch; R. Dave; L.A. Meyer (eds.),Annex I: Glossary J–P, archived fromthe original on 3 May 2010
  132. ^Markandya, A. (2001)."7.3.5 Cost Implications of Alternative GHG Emission Reduction Options and Carbon Sinks". In B. Metz; et al. (eds.).Costing Methodologies. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Print version: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, and New York. This version: GRID-Arendal website.ISBN 978-0-521-01502-8. Archived fromthe original on 5 August 2011. Retrieved11 April 2011.
  133. ^Page, S.; Siegert, F.; Rieley, J.; Boehm, H.; Jaya, A.; Limin, S. (2002). "The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997".Nature.420 (6911):61–65.Bibcode:2002Natur.420...61P.doi:10.1038/nature01131.PMID 12422213.S2CID 4379529.
  134. ^Lazaroff, Cat (2002-11-08)."Indonesian Wildfires Accelerated Global Warming".Environment New Service. Archived fromthe original on 8 September 2019. Retrieved2011-11-07.
  135. ^Pearce, Fred (6 November 2004)."Massive peat burn is speeding climate change". New Scientist.
  136. ^Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (6 February 2020)."4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors".World Resources Institute. Retrieved30 December 2020.
  137. ^Ritchie, Hannah (6 October 2020)."Cars, planes, trains: where do CO2 emissions from transport come from?".Our World in Data. Retrieved19 June 2021.
  138. ^"EU countries agree to 30 percent cut in truck CO2 emissions".Reuters. 20 December 2018.
  139. ^Walker TR, Adebambo O, Del Aguila Feijoo MC, Elhaimer E, Hossain T, Edwards SJ, Morrison CE, Romo J, Sharma N, Taylor S, Zomorodi S (2019). "Environmental Effects of Marine Transportation".World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation. pp. 505–530.doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-805052-1.00030-9.ISBN 978-0-12-805052-1.S2CID 135422637.
  140. ^Vidal, John (2009-04-09)."Health risks of shipping pollution have been 'underestimated'".The Guardian. Retrieved2009-07-03.
  141. ^"Infrastructure Podcast; Decarbonized Shipping". World Bank. 2022-03-16. Retrieved2022-08-18.
  142. ^Kersing, Arjen; Stone, Matt (2022-01-25)."Charting global shipping's path to zero carbon". McKinsey. Retrieved2022-08-18.
  143. ^Raucci, Carlo (2019-06-06)."Three pathways to shipping's decarbonization". Global Maritime Forum. Archived fromthe original on 2023-05-28. Retrieved2022-08-18.
  144. ^Brandon Graver; Kevin Zhang; Dan Rutherford (September 2019)."CO2 emissions from commercial aviation, 2018"(PDF).International Council on Clean Transportation.
  145. ^Davidson, Jordan (4 September 2020)."Aviation Accounts for 3.5% of Global Warming Caused by Humans, New Research Says". Ecowatch. Retrieved6 September 2020.
  146. ^"Average passenger aircraft emissions and energy consumption per passenger kilometre in Finland 2008".lipasto.vtt.fi.Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved3 July 2009.
  147. ^Friedlingstein, Pierre; O'Sullivan, Michael; Jones, Matthew W.; Andrew, Robbie M.; Hauck, Judith; Olsen, Are; Peters, Glen P.; Peters, Wouter; Pongratz, Julia; Sitch, Stephen; Le Quéré, Corinne; Canadell, Josep G.; Ciais, Philippe; Jackson, Robert B.; Alin, Simone (2020)."Global Carbon Budget 2020"(PDF).Earth System Science Data.12 (4):3269–3340.Bibcode:2020ESSD...12.3269F.doi:10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020.ISSN 1866-3516.
  148. ^abÜrge-Vorsatz, Diana; Khosla, Radhika; Bernhardt, Rob; Chan, Yi Chieh; Vérez, David; Hu, Shan; Cabeza, Luisa F. (2020)."Advances Toward a Net-Zero Global Building Sector".Annual Review of Environment and Resources.45:227–269.doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-045843.hdl:10459.1/69710.
  149. ^"Why the building sector?".Architecture 2020. Retrieved1 April 2021.
  150. ^Fowlie, Meredith; Greenstone, Michael; Wolfram, Catherine (2018-08-01)."Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program".The Quarterly Journal of Economics.133 (3):1597–1644.doi:10.1093/qje/qjy005.ISSN 0033-5533.Archived from the original on 2020-06-07. Retrieved2020-11-21.
  151. ^"Sequestering Carbon in Buildings".Green Energy Times. 23 June 2017. Retrieved22 January 2021.
  152. ^"IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change". Retrieved4 April 2022.
  153. ^abcdInternational Energy Agency (2019).Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2019. Paris: IEA.ISBN 978-92-807-3768-4.Archived from the original on 2020-11-26. Retrieved2020-11-20.
  154. ^"CoatingsTech - Coatings and Low-carbon Cement Technology".www.coatingstech-digital.org. Retrieved2022-07-07.
  155. ^De Ras, Kevin; Van De Vijver, Ruben; Galvita, Vladimir V.; Marin, Guy B.; Van Geem, Kevin M. (2019-12-01)."Carbon capture and utilization in the steel industry: challenges and opportunities for chemical engineering".Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering.26:81–87.Bibcode:2019COCE...26...81D.doi:10.1016/j.coche.2019.09.001.hdl:1854/LU-8635595.ISSN 2211-3398.S2CID 210619173.Archived from the original on 2021-05-20. Retrieved2021-07-02.
  156. ^Alter, Lloyd (1 April 2019)."Let's rename "Embodied Carbon" to "Upfront Carbon Emissions"".TreeHugger.Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved10 August 2019.
  157. ^"New Buildings: Embodied Carbon".Architecture 2030.Archived from the original on 12 December 2018. Retrieved10 August 2019.
  158. ^Pomponi, Francesco; Moncaster, Alice (2016)."Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment - What does the evidence say?".Journal of Environmental Management.181:687–700.Bibcode:2016JEnvM.181..687P.doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036.PMID 27558830.Archived from the original on 2021-11-20. Retrieved2021-07-27.
  159. ^"The World's Biggest Emitter of Greenhouse Gases".Bloomberg.com. 17 March 2020. Retrieved29 December 2020.
  160. ^Global, Regional, and National CO2 EmissionsArchived 2007-07-11 at theWayback Machine. InTrends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres, 2005, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
  161. ^"Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership (GGFR)".worldbank.org. TheWorld Bank.Archived from the original on August 26, 2016. RetrievedAugust 24, 2016.previous redirect from web.worldbank.org
  162. ^Tsaia, I-Tsung; Al Alia, Meshayel; El Waddi, Sanaâ; Adnan Zarzourb, aOthman (2013)."Carbon Capture Regulation for the Steel and Aluminum Industries in the UAE: An Empirical Analysis".Energy Procedia.37:7732–7740.Bibcode:2013EnPro..37.7732T.doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.719.ISSN 1876-6102.OCLC 5570078737.
  163. ^Gast, Lukas; Cabrera Serrenho, André; Allwood, Julian M. (2022-07-19)."What Contribution Could Industrial Symbiosis Make to Mitigating Industrial Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions in Bulk Material Production?".Environmental Science & Technology.56 (14):10269–10278.Bibcode:2022EnST...5610269G.doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c01753.ISSN 0013-936X.PMC 9301909.PMID 35772406.
  164. ^Zheng, Jiajia; Suh, Sangwon (May 2019)."Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics"(PDF).Nature Climate Change.9 (5):374–378.Bibcode:2019NatCC...9..374Z.doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0459-z.ISSN 1758-6798.S2CID 145873387.
  165. ^"The Link Between Plastic Use and Climate Change: Nitty-gritty".stanfordmag.org. 2009. Retrieved5 March 2021.... According to the EPA, approximately one ounce of carbon dioxide is emitted for each ounce of polyethylene (PET) produced. PET is the type of plastic most commonly used for beverage bottles. ...'
  166. ^Glazner, Elizabeth (21 November 2017)."Plastic Pollution and Climate Change".Plastic Pollution Coalition. Retrieved6 August 2018.
  167. ^Blue, Marie-Luise (11 June 2018)."What Is the Carbon Footprint of a Plastic Bottle?".Sciencing. Leaf Group Ltd. Retrieved6 August 2018.
  168. ^Royer, Sarah-Jeanne; Ferrón, Sara; Wilson, Samuel T.; Karl, David M. (1 August 2018)."Production of methane and ethylene from plastics in the environment".PLOS ONE.13 (Plastic, Climate Change) e0200574.Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1300574R.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200574.PMC 6070199.PMID 30067755.
  169. ^Rosane, Olivia (2 August 2018)."Study Finds New Reason to Ban Plastic: It Emits Methane in the Sun". No. Plastic, Climate Change. Ecowatch. Retrieved6 August 2018.
  170. ^"Sweeping New Report on Global Environmental Impact of Plastics Reveals Severe Damage to Climate".Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL). Retrieved16 May 2019.
  171. ^Plastic & Climate The Hidden Costs of a Plastic Planet(PDF). Center for International Environmental Law, Environmental Integrity Project, FracTracker Alliance, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, 5 Gyres, and Break Free From Plastic. May 2019. pp. 82–85. Retrieved20 May 2019.
  172. ^"World GHG Emissions Flow Chart"(PDF).Ecofys.com. 2010. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 6 November 2018. Retrieved16 August 2018.
  173. ^"Data Centres and Data Transmission Networks – Analysis".IEA. Retrieved2022-03-06.
  174. ^Freitag, Charlotte; Berners-Lee, Mike (December 2020). "The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations".arXiv:2102.02622 [physics.soc-ph].
  175. ^"The computer chip industry has a dirty climate secret".the Guardian. 18 September 2021. Retrieved18 September 2021.
  176. ^"Working from home is erasing carbon emissions -- but for how long?".Grist. 19 May 2020. Retrieved4 April 2021.
  177. ^Cunliff, Colin (6 July 2020)."Beyond the Energy Techlash: The Real Climate Impacts of Information Technology".
  178. ^Foteinis, Spyros (7 February 2018)."Bitcoin's alarming carbon footprint".Nature.554 (7691): 169.Bibcode:2018Natur.554..169F.doi:10.1038/d41586-018-01625-x.
  179. ^Krause, Max J.; Tolaymat, Thabet (November 2018). "Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies".Nature Sustainability.1 (11):711–718.Bibcode:2018NatSu...1..711K.doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0152-7.S2CID 169170289.
  180. ^Davies, Pascale (26 February 2022)."Bitcoin mining is worse for the environment now since China banned it".euronews. Retrieved1 March 2022.
  181. ^Ponciano, Jonathan."Bill Gates Sounds Alarm On Bitcoin's Energy Consumption–Here's Why Crypto Is Bad For Climate Change".Forbes. Retrieved30 July 2021.
  182. ^Huang, Jon; O'Neill, Claire; Tabuchi, Hiroko (3 September 2021)."Bitcoin Uses More Electricity Than Many Countries. How Is That Possible?".The New York Times.ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved1 March 2022.
  183. ^"Bitcoin energy consumption worldwide 2017-2021".Statista. Retrieved1 March 2022.
  184. ^Andrae, Anders; Edler, Tomas (2015)."On Global Electricity Usage of Communication Technology: Trends to 2030".Challenges.6 (1):117–157.doi:10.3390/challe6010117.ISSN 2078-1547. Text was copied from this source, which is available under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  185. ^J. Eckelman, Matthew; Huang, Kaixin; Dubrow, Robert; D. Sherman, Jodi (December 2020)."Health Care Pollution And Public Health Damage In The United States: An Update".Health Affairs.39 (12):2071–2079.doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01247.PMID 33284703.
  186. ^Eckelman, Matthew J.; Sherman, Jodi D. (April 2018)."Estimated Global Disease Burden From US Health Care Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions".American Journal of Public Health.108 (S2):S120 –S122.doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303846.ISSN 0090-0036.PMC 5922190.PMID 29072942.
  187. ^Howard, Guy; Calow, Roger; Macdonald, Alan; Bartram, Jamie (2016)."Climate Change and Water and Sanitation: Likely Impacts and Emerging Trends for Action".Annual Review of Environment and Resources.41 (1):253–276.Bibcode:2016ARER...41..253H.doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085856.ISSN 1543-5938.S2CID 155259589.
  188. ^abcdAlix, Alexandre; Bellet, Laurent; Trommsdorff, Corinne; Audureau, Iris, eds. (2022).Reducing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Water and Sanitation Services: Overview of emissions and their potential reduction illustrated by utility know-how. IWA Publishing.doi:10.2166/9781789063172.ISBN 978-1-78906-317-2.S2CID 250128707.
  189. ^"Environmental Impacts of Tourism – Global Level". UNEP.
  190. ^abSun, Ya-Yen; Gossling, Stefan; Zhou, Wanru (2022-11-01)."Does tourism increase or decrease carbon emissions? A systematic review".Annals of Tourism Research.97 103502.doi:10.1016/j.annals.2022.103502.ISSN 0160-7383.
  191. ^"Banking on climate neutrality The global banking industry's role in transitioning to a low-carbon economy".www.deloitte.com. Retrieved2025-05-15.
  192. ^abThomasson, Emma (2025-05-15)."NGFS scenarios foresee climate hit to global growth before 2030".Green Central Banking. Retrieved2025-05-15.
  193. ^"Guidance for Climate Target Setting for Banks – Version 3". Retrieved2025-05-15.
  194. ^"About PCAF | PCAF".carbonaccountingfinancials.com. Retrieved2025-05-15.
  195. ^"IPCC Working Group III – Mitigation of Climate Change, Annex III: Technology – specific cost and performance parameters – Table A.III.2 (Emissions of selected electricity supply technologies (gCO2-eq/kWh))"(PDF). IPCC. 2014. p. 1335.Archived(PDF) from the original on 14 December 2018. Retrieved14 December 2018.
  196. ^"Full lifecycle emissions intensity of global coal and gas supply for heat generation, 2018 – Charts – Data & Statistics".IEA.Archived from the original on 24 June 2020. Retrieved2020-07-30.
  197. ^Nuclear Power Results – Life Cycle Assessment HarmonizationArchived 2 July 2013 at theWayback Machine, NREL Laboratory, Alliance For Sustainable Energy LLC website, U.S. Department Of Energy, last updated: 24 January 2013.
  198. ^Climate Equality: a Climate for the 99%(PDF). Oxfam International. November 2023.Archived(PDF) from the original on 23 November 2023. Fig. ES.2, Fig. ES.3, Box 1.2.
  199. ^abCozzi, Laura; Chen, Olivia; Kim, Hyeji (22 February 2023)."The world's top 1% of emitters produce over 1000 times more CO2 than the bottom 1%".iea.org. International Energy Agency (IEA).Archived from the original on 3 March 2023. "Methodological note: ... The analysis accounts for energy-related CO2, and not other greenhouse gases, nor those related to land use and agriculture."
  200. ^Rapid Transition Alliance, 13 April 2021"Cambridge Sustainability Commission Report on Scaling Behaviour Change"Archived 2022-02-05 at theWayback Machine p. 20
  201. ^Emission trends and drivers, Ch 2 in "Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change".http://www.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  202. ^abClimate Change 2022 ipcc.chArchived 4 April 2022 at theWayback Machine
  203. ^Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (19 June 2020)."Scientists' warning on affluence".Nature Communications.11 (1): 3107.Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W.doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y.ISSN 2041-1723.PMC 7305220.PMID 32561753.
  204. ^Nielsen, Kristian S.; Nicholas, Kimberly A.;Creutzig, Felix; Dietz, Thomas; Stern, Paul C. (30 September 2021)."The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions".Nature Energy.6 (11):1011–1016.Bibcode:2021NatEn...6.1011N.doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00900-y.ISSN 2058-7546.S2CID 244191460.
  205. ^Gore, Tim (2020-09-23)."Confronting carbon inequality".Oxfam International.Archived from the original on 24 March 2022. Retrieved2022-03-20.
  206. ^Kartha, Sivan; Kemp-Benedict, Eric; Ghosh, Emily; Nazareth, Anisha; Gore, Tim (September 2020)."The Carbon Inequality Era: An assessment of the global distribution of consumption emissions among individuals from 1990 to 2015 and beyond"(PDF).Stockholm Environment Institute.Archived(PDF) from the original on 22 January 2022. Retrieved11 May 2022.
  207. ^Clifford, Catherine (26 January 2021)."The '1%' are the main drivers of climate change, but it hits the poor the hardest: Oxfam report".CNBC.Archived from the original on 28 October 2021. Retrieved28 October 2021.
  208. ^Berkhout, Esmé; Galasso, Nick; Lawson, Max; Rivero Morales, Pablo Andrés; Taneja, Anjela; Vázquez Pimentel, Diego Alejo (25 January 2021)."The Inequality Virus".Oxfam International.Archived from the original on 28 October 2021. Retrieved28 October 2021.
  209. ^"Emissions Gap Report 2020 / Executive Summary"(PDF).United Nations Environment Programme. 2021. p. XV Fig. ES.8.Archived(PDF) from the original on 31 July 2021.
  210. ^Paddison, Laura (28 October 2021)."How the rich are driving climate change".BBC.Archived from the original on 5 November 2021. Retrieved7 November 2021.
  211. ^Oswald, Yannick; Owen, Anne; Steinberger, Julia K. (March 2020)."Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories"(PDF).Nature Energy.5 (3):231–239.Bibcode:2020NatEn...5..231O.doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0579-8.ISSN 2058-7546.S2CID 216245301.Archived(PDF) from the original on 28 October 2021. Retrieved16 November 2021.
  212. ^Timperley, Jocelyn."Who is really to blame for climate change?".www.bbc.com. Retrieved8 June 2022.
  213. ^Zheng, Heran; Long, Yin; Wood, Richard; Moran, Daniel; Zhang, Zengkai; Meng, Jing; Feng, Kuishuang; Hertwich, Edgar; Guan, Dabo (March 2022)."Ageing society in developed countries challenges carbon mitigation".Nature Climate Change.12 (3):241–248.Bibcode:2022NatCC..12..241Z.doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01302-y.hdl:11250/3027882.ISSN 1758-6798.S2CID 247322718.
  214. ^Compilation and synthesis of fifth national communications. Executive summary. Note by the secretariat(PDF). Geneva (Switzerland):United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2011. pp. 9–10.
  215. ^Fawzy, Samer; Osman, Ahmed I.; Doran, John; Rooney, David W. (2020)."Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review".Environmental Chemistry Letters.18 (6):2069–2094.Bibcode:2020EnvCL..18.2069F.doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w.
  216. ^Abbass, Kashif; Qasim, Muhammad Zeeshan; Song, Huaming; Murshed, Muntasir; Mahmood, Haider; Younis, Ijaz (2022)."A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures".Environmental Science and Pollution Research.29 (28):42539–42559.Bibcode:2022ESPR...2942539A.doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6.PMC 8978769.PMID 35378646.
  217. ^Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022).Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (Report). IPCC. Retrieved30 October 2025.
  218. ^Ritchie, Hannah;Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (11 May 2020)."CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions".Our World in Data. Retrieved27 August 2022.
  219. ^Rogelj, J.; Shindell, D.; Jiang, K.; Fifta, S.; et al. (2018)."Chapter 2: Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5 °C in the Context of Sustainable Development"(PDF).Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty(PDF).
  220. ^Harvey, Fiona (26 November 2019)."UN calls for push to cut greenhouse gas levels to avoid climate chaos". The Guardian. Retrieved27 November 2019.
  221. ^"Cut Global Emissions by 7.6 Percent Every Year for Next Decade to Meet 1.5°C Paris Target – UN Report".United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations. Retrieved27 November 2019.
  222. ^IPCC (2022)Summary for policy makers inClimate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, United States
  223. ^Ram M., Bogdanov D., Aghahosseini A., Gulagi A., Oyewo A.S., Child M., Caldera U., Sadovskaia K., Farfan J., Barbosa LSNS., Fasihi M., Khalili S., Dalheimer B., Gruber G., Traber T., De Caluwe F., Fell H.-J., Breyer C.Global Energy System based on 100% Renewable Energy – Power, Heat, Transport and Desalination SectorsArchived 2021-04-01 at theWayback Machine. Study by Lappeenranta University of Technology and Energy Watch Group, Lappeenranta, Berlin, March 2019.
  224. ^van Heerden, Rik; Edelenbosch, Oreane Y.; Daioglou, Vassilis; Le Gallic, Thomas; Baptista, Luiz Bernardo; Di Bella, Alice; Colelli, Francesco Pietro; Emmerling, Johannes; Fragkos, Panagiotis; Hasse, Robin; Hoppe, Johanna; Kishimoto, Paul; Leblanc, Florian; Lefèvre, Julien; Luderer, Gunnar (2025)."Demand-side strategies enable rapid and deep cuts in buildings and transport emissions to 2050".Nature Energy.10 (3):380–394.Bibcode:2025NatEn..10..380V.doi:10.1038/s41560-025-01703-1.ISSN 2058-7546.
  225. ^"Cement – Analysis".IEA. Retrieved24 November 2022.
  226. ^"4.2".Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change(PDF) (Report). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2022. Retrieved3 May 2025.Transformative changes for the near term include rapid decarbonisation of the electricity sector and low‑carbon electrification of buildings, industry and transport.
  227. ^Nadel, Steven (2019). "Electrification in the Transportation, Buildings, and Industrial Sectors: A Review of Opportunities, Barriers, and Policies".Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports.6 (4):158–168.Bibcode:2019CSRER...6..158N.doi:10.1007/s40518-019-00138-z.
  228. ^EIA (October 2023).International Energy Outlook 2023(PDF). Washington DC, USA: US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Retrieved2023-10-11. Informally describes as a "narrative" and tagged IEO2023.
  229. ^EIA (11 October 2023)."International Energy Outlook 2023 — Landing page".US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Washington DC, USA. Retrieved2023-10-13. Landing page.
  230. ^CSIS (11 October 2023).US EIA's International Energy Outlook 2023. Washington DC, USA: Center for Strategic and International Studies (SCIS). Retrieved2023-10-13. YouTube. Duration: 00:57:12. Includes interview withJoseph DeCarolis.
  231. ^abUnited Nations Environment Programme (2022).Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window — Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies. Nairobi.
  232. ^"It's over for fossil fuels: IPCC spells out what's needed to avert climate disaster".The Guardian. 4 April 2022. Retrieved4 April 2022.
  233. ^"The evidence is clear: the time for action is now. We can halve emissions by 2030".IPCC. 4 April 2022. Retrieved4 April 2022.
  234. ^"Ambitious Action Key to Resolving Triple Planetary Crisis of Climate Disruption, Nature Loss, Pollution, Secretary-General Says in Message for International Mother Earth Day | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases".www.un.org. Retrieved10 June 2022.
  235. ^Bustamante, Mercedes; et al. (2023)."Ten new insights in climate science 2023".Global Sustainability.7 e19.Bibcode:2023GlSus...7E..19B.doi:10.1017/sus.2023.25.hdl:20.500.11850/648183. Retrieved6 May 2025.
  236. ^abCrippa, M.; Guizzardi, D.; Pagani, F.; Banja, M.; Muntean, M.; Schaaf, E.; Monforti-Ferrario, F.; Becker, W.E.; Quadrelli, R.; Risquez Martin, A.; Taghavi-Moharamli, P.; Köykkä, J.; Grassi, G.; Rossi, S.; Melo, J.; Oom, D.; Branco, A.; San-Miguel, J.; Manca, G.; Pisoni, E.; Vignati, E.; Pekar, F. (2024).GHG emissions of all world countries – 2024. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.doi:10.2760/4002897.ISBN 978-92-68-20572-3. Retrieved2024-09-18.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  237. ^Crippa, M.; Guizzardi, D.; Pagani, F.; Banja, M.; Muntean, M.; Schaaf, E.; Monforti-Ferrario, F.; Becker, W.E.; Quadrelli, R.; Risquez Martin, A.; Taghavi-Moharamli, P.; Köykkä, J.; Grassi, G.; Rossi, S.; Melo, J.; Oom, D.; Branco, A.; San-Miguel, J.; Manca, G.; Pisoni, E.; Vignati, E.; Pekar, F. (2024).GHG emissions of all world countries – 2024. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.doi:10.2760/4002897.ISBN 978-92-68-20572-3. Retrieved2024-09-18.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  238. ^"Climate Change Indicators: U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions / Figure 3. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions per Capita and per Dollar of GDP, 1990–2020".EPA.gov. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 27 June 2016.Archived from the original on 5 April 2023.
  239. ^US EPA, OAR (2017-02-08)."Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks".United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved2022-08-04.
  240. ^US EPA, OAR (2015-12-29)."Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions".www.epa.gov. Retrieved2025-10-24.
  241. ^"Report: China emissions exceed all developed nations combined".BBC News. 2021-05-07.
  242. ^"The world is still falling short of meeting its climate goals".Environment. 2021-10-26. Archived fromthe original on October 26, 2021. Retrieved2021-10-28.
  243. ^"Who has contributed most to global CO2 emissions?".Our World in Data. Retrieved2021-12-29.
  244. ^Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (2020-02-06)."4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors".World Resources Institute. Retrieved2020-04-29.
  245. ^"The Carbon Brief Profile: India".Carbon Brief. 2019-03-14. Retrieved2019-09-25.
  246. ^Government of India (2018)India Second Biennial Update Report to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
  247. ^ab"India: Third Biennial Update Report to The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change"(PDF).Archived(PDF) from the original on 2021-02-27.
  248. ^"By 2030, Cut Per Capita Emission to Global Average: India to G20".The Leading Solar Magazine In India. 26 July 2021. Retrieved2021-09-17.
  249. ^"Greenhouse Gas Emissions in India"(PDF). September 2018.Archived(PDF) from the original on 2020-02-14. Retrieved10 June 2021.
  250. ^"Emissions Gap Report 2019".UN Environment Programme. 2019.Archived from the original on 2019-11-20. Retrieved10 June 2021.
  251. ^"CO2 Emissions in 2023 – Analysis".IEA. March 2024. Retrieved2024-03-22.
  252. ^abTollefson J (January 2021). "COVID curbed carbon emissions in 2020 - but not by much".Nature.589 (7842): 343.Bibcode:2021Natur.589..343T.doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00090-3.PMID 33452515.S2CID 231622354.
  253. ^Forster PM, Forster HI, Evans MJ, Gidden MJ, Jones CD, Keller CA, et al. (August 2020)."Erratum: Publisher Correction: Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19".Nature Climate Change.10 (10): 971.doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0904-z.PMC 7427494.PMID 32845944.
  254. ^Rume T, Islam SM (September 2020)."Environmental effects of COVID-19 pandemic and potential strategies of sustainability".Heliyon.6 (9) e04965.Bibcode:2020Heliy...604965R.doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04965.PMC 7498239.PMID 32964165.
  255. ^Forster PM, Forster HI, Evans MJ, Gidden MJ, Jones CD, Keller CA, et al. (7 August 2020)."Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19"(PDF).Nature Climate Change.10 (10):913–919.Bibcode:2020NatCC..10..913F.doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0.ISSN 1758-6798.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toGreenhouse gas emissions.
Overview
Overview
Sources
History
Physical
Flora and fauna
Social and economic
By country and region
Economics and finance
Energy
Preserving and enhancing
carbon sinks
Other
Society andadaptation
Society
Adaptation
Communication
International agreements
Background and theory
Measurements
Theory
Research and modelling
Greenhouse gas emissions by country
General
Causes
Effects
Mitigation
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenhouse_gas_emissions&oldid=1323569674"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp