Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Greater Germanic Reich

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Planned state by Nazi Germany
This article is about the conceptual entity that the Nazis planned to establish during World War II. For the historically existent "Greater German Reich", seeNazi Germany.

Boundaries of the planned "Greater Germanic Reich," including possible satellites and protectorates:[1][2][3]
  Greater Germanic Reich
(With planned eastern expansions ofReichskommissariats)
  Satellite states totally dependent upon the Reich
  States dependent upon the Reich

TheGreater Germanic Reich (German:Großgermanisches Reich), fully styled theGreater Germanic Reich of the German Nation (German:Großgermanisches Reich der Deutschen Nation),[4] was the official state name of the political entity thatNazi Germany tried to establish in Europe duringWorld War II.[5] The territorial claims for the Greater Germanic Reich fluctuated over time. As early as the autumn of 1933,Adolf Hitler envisionedannexing such territories asBohemia, westernPoland, andAustria to Germany and the formation ofsatellite orpuppet states without independent economies or policies of their own.[6]

Thispan-Germanic Empire was expected toassimilate practically all ofGermanic Europe into an enormously expandedReich. Territorially speaking, this encompassed the already-enlargedGerman Reich itself (consisting of pre-1938 Germany proper,Austria,Bohemia,Moravia,Czech Silesia,Alsace-Lorraine,Eupen-Malmedy,Memel,Lower Styria,Upper Carniola,Southern Carinthia,Danzig, andPoland), theNetherlands,Belgium,Luxembourg,Denmark,Norway,Sweden,Iceland,Liechtenstein, parts of northern and northeastern France, and theGerman-speaking andFrench-speaking parts ofSwitzerland.[2]

The most notable Germanic-speaking exception would have been theUnited Kingdom: theNazis' New Order envisaged the role of Britain not as a German province but instead as a German-allied seafaring partner.[7] Another exception was the German-populated territory inSouth Tyrol, an area which Germany assigned to its fellow-Axis power,Fascist Italy, in 1939. Aside from Germanic Europe, the Reich's western frontiers with France were to revert to those of the earlierHoly Roman Empire, which would have meant the complete German annexation of all ofWallonia,French Switzerland, and large areas of northern and eastern France.[3] Additionally, the policy ofLebensraum required mass expansion of Germany and the settlement of Germans eastwards as far as theUral Mountains (seizing territory from theBaltic states and theSoviet Union in the process).[8][9] Hitler originally planned for the deportation of any"surplus" Russian population living west of theUrals to resettlement east of the Urals inSiberia.[10]

Ideological background

[edit]

Racial theories

[edit]
Part ofa series on
Nazism
Further information:Master race

Nazi racial ideology regarded theGermanic peoples of Europe as belonging to aracially superiorNordic subset of the largerAryan race, who were regarded as the only true culture-bearers of civilized society.[11] These peoples were viewed as either "true Germanic peoples" that had "lost their sense of racial pride", or as close racial relatives of the Germans.[12] German ChancellorAdolf Hitler also believed that theAncient Greeks andRomans were the racial ancestors of the Germans, and the first torchbearers of "Nordic–Greek" art and culture.[13][14] He particularly expressedhis admiration forAncient Sparta, declaring it to have been the purest racial state:[15]

"The subjugation of 350,000Helots by 6,000 Spartans was only possible because of the racial superiority of the Spartans." The Spartans had created "the first racialist state."[16]

Furthermore, Hitler's concept of "Germanic" did not simply refer to anethnic,cultural, orlinguistic group, but also to a distinctlybiological one, the superior "Germanic blood" that he wanted to salvage from the control of the enemies of the Aryan race. He stated that Germany possessed more of these "Germanic elements" than any other country in the world, which he estimated as "four fifths of our people".[17]

Wherever Germanic blood is to be found anywhere in the world, we will take what is good for ourselves. With what the others have left, they will be unable to oppose the Germanic Empire.

— Adolf Hitler

According to the Nazis, in addition to the Germanic peoples, individuals of seemingly non-Germanic nationality such asFrench,Polish,Walloon,Czech and so on might actually possess valuable Germanic blood, especially if they were ofaristocratic orpeasant stock.[18] In order to "recover" these "missing" Germanic elements, they had to be made conscious of their Germanic ancestry through the process ofGermanization (the term used by the Nazis for this process wasUmvolkung, "restoration to the race").[18] If the "recovery" was impossible, these individuals had to be destroyed to deny the enemy of using their superior blood against the Aryan race.[18] An example of this type of Nazi Germanization is thekidnapping of "racially valuable" Eastern European children. Curiously, those chosen for Germanization who rejected the Nazis were viewed as being racially more suitable than those who went along without objections, as according to Himmler "it was in the nature of German blood to resist".[19]

On the very first page ofMein Kampf, Hitler openly declared his belief that "common blood belongs in a common Reich", elucidating the notion that the innate quality ofrace (as the Nazi movement perceived it) should hold precedence over "artificial" concepts such asnational identity (including regional German identities such asPrussian andBavarian) as the deciding factor for which people were "worthy" of being assimilated into a Greater Germanracial state (EinVolk, EinReich, EinFührer).[20] Part of the strategic methods which Hitler chose to ensure the present and future supremacy of the Aryan race (which was, according to Hitler, "gradually approaching extinction"[21]) was to do away with what he described as the "small state rubbish" (Kleinstaatengerümpel, compareKleinstaaterei) in Europe in order to unite all these Nordic countries into one unified racial community.[22] From 1921 onward he advocated the creation of a "Germanic Reich of the German Nation".[5]

It wasthe continent which brought civilization to Great Britain and in turn enabled her to colonize large areas in the rest of the world. America is unthinkable without Europe. Why would we not have the necessary power to become one of the world's centres of attraction? A hundred-and-twenty million people of Germanic origin – if they have consolidated their position this will be a power against which no-one in the world could stand up to. The countries which form the Germanic world have only to gain from this. I can see that in my own case. Mybirth country is one of the most beautiful regions in the Reich, but what could it do if it were left to its own devices? There is no possibility to develop one’s talents in countries like Austria orSaxony, Denmark or Switzerland. There is no foundation. That is why it is fortunate that potential new spaces are again opened for the Germanic peoples.

— Adolf Hitler, 1942.[23]

Name

[edit]
Further information:Reich

The chosen name for the projected empire was a deliberate reference to theHoly Roman Empire (of the German Nation) that existed inmedieval times, known as theFirst Reich in Nazi historiography.[24] Different aspects of the legacy of this medieval empire in German history were both celebrated and derided by the government of Nazi Germany. Hitler admired theFrankish EmperorCharlemagne for his "cultural creativity", his powers of organization, and his renunciation of therights of the individual.[24] He criticized the Holy Roman Emperors however for not pursuing anOstpolitik (Eastern Policy) resembling his own, while being politically focused exclusively onthe south.[24] After theAnschluss, Hitler ordered the oldimperial regalia (theImperial Crown,Imperial Sword,the Holy Lance and other items) residing inVienna to be transferred toNuremberg, where they were kept between 1424 and 1796.[25] Nuremberg, in addition to being the former unofficial capital of the Holy Roman Empire, was also the place of theNuremberg rallies. The transfer of the regalia was thus done to both legitimize Hitler's Germany as the successor of the "Old Reich", but also weaken Vienna, the former imperial residence.[26]

After the1939 German occupation of Bohemia, Hitler declared that the Holy Roman Empire had been "resurrected", although he secretly maintained his own empire to be better than the old "Roman" one.[27] Unlike the "uncomfortablyinternationalist Catholic empire ofBarbarossa", the Germanic Reich of the German Nation would beracist andnationalist.[27] Rather than a return to the values of the Middle Ages, its establishment was to be "a push forward to a newgolden age, in which the best aspects of the past would be combined with modern racist and nationalist thinking".[27]

The historical borders of the Holy Empire were also used as grounds for territorial revisionism by the NSDAP, laying claim to modern territories and states that were once part of it. Even before the war, Hitler had dreamed of reversing thePeace of Westphalia, which had given the territories of the Empire almost complete sovereignty.[28] On November 17, 1939,Reich Minister of PropagandaJoseph Goebbels wrote inhis diary that the "total liquidation" of this historic treaty was the "great goal" of the Nazi regime,[28] and that since it had been signed inMünster, it would also be officially repealed in the same city.[29]

Pan-Germanism versus Pan-Germanicism

[edit]
Further information:Pan-Germanism

Despite intending to grant the other "Germanics" of Europe a racially superior status alongside theGermans themselves in an anticipated post-war racio-political order, the Nazis did not however consider granting the subject populations of these countries any national rights of their own.[11] The other Germanic countries were seen as mere extensions of Germany rather than individual units in any way,[11] and the Germans were unequivocally intended to remain the empire's "most powerful source of strength, from both an ideological as well as military standpoint".[23] EvenHeinrich Himmler, who among the senior Nazis most staunchly supported the concept, could not shake off the idea of a hierarchical distinction between GermanVolk and GermanicVölker.[30] TheSS's official newspaper,Das Schwarze Korps, never succeeded in reconciling the contradiction between Germanic 'brotherhood' and German superiority.[30] Members of Nazi-type parties in Germanic countries were also forbidden to attend public meetings of theNazi Party when they visited Germany. After theBattle of Stalingrad this ban was lifted, but only if the attendees made prior notice of their arrival so that the events' speakers could be warned in advance not to make disparaging remarks about their country of origin.[31]

Although Hitler himself and Himmler's SS advocated for a pan-Germanic Empire, the objective was not universally held in the Nazi regime.[32]

Germanic mysticism

[edit]
Further information:Religious aspects of Nazism

There were also disagreements within the NSDAP leadership on the spiritual implications of cultivating a 'Germanic history' in their ideological program. Hitler was highly critical of Himmler'sesotericvölkisch interpretation of the 'Germanic mission'. When Himmler denouncedCharlemagne in a speech as "the butcher of theSaxons", Hitler stated that this was not a 'historical crime' but in fact a good thing, for the subjugation ofWidukind had broughtWestern culture into what eventually becameGermany, however he criticised the religious policies that came with it, claiming that even Islam would have been better than Christianity due to its meekness.[33] He also disapproved of thearchaeological projects which Himmler organized through hisAhnenerbe organization, such as excavations of pre-historic Germanic sites: "Why do we call the whole world's attention to the fact that we have no past?",[33] in reference to Germany's lack of urban civilisation historically.

In an attempt to eventually supplantChristianity with a religion more amenable toNazi racial theories, Himmler, together withAlfred Rosenberg, sought to replace it withGermanic paganism (the indigenous traditional religion orVolksreligion of the Germanic peoples), of which the JapaneseShinto was seen as an almost perfect East Asian counterpart.[34] For this purpose they had ordered the construction of sites for the worship of Germanic cults in order to exchangeChristian rituals for Germanicconsecration ceremonies, which included different marriage andburial rites.[34] In Heinrich Heims'Adolf Hitler, Monologe im FHQ 1941–1944 (several editions, here Orbis Verlag, 2000), Hitler is quoted as having said on 14 October 1941: "It seems to be inexpressibly stupid to allow a revival of the cult of Odin/Wotan. Our old mythology of the gods was defunct, and incapable of revival, when Christianity came...the whole world of antiquity either followedphilosophical systems on the one hand, orworshipped the gods. But in modern times it is undesirable that all humanity should make such a fool of itself." This was in reference to bringing Germans back to idol worship in what Hitler saw as an era of science that would reject it.[citation needed]

Establishment strategy

[edit]
Poster from theWochenspruch der NSDAP series, 22 February 1942. Hitler's quote reads: "When this war is over, I will return as an even more fanatic National Socialist than I was before."

The goal was first proclaimed publicly in the 1937Nuremberg Rallies.[35] Hitler's last speech at this event ended with the words "The German nation has after all acquired its Germanic Reich", which elicited speculation in political circles of a 'new era' in Germany'sforeign policy.[35] Several days before the event Hitler tookAlbert Speer aside when both were on their way to the former's Munich apartment with an entourage, and declared to him that "We will create a great empire. All the Germanic peoples will be included in it. It will begin in Norway and extend tonorthern Italy.[nb 1][36] I myself must carry this out. If only I keepmy health!"[35] On April 9, 1940, as Germany invaded Denmark and Norway inOperation Weserübung, Hitler announced the establishment of the Germanic Reich: "Just as the Bismarck Empire arose from the year 1866, so too will the Greater Germanic Empire arise from this day."[28]

"Germany decides [its future goal] to adopt a clear, farsighted policy of space. It thus turns away from all international industrial and international trade policy attempts and instead concentrates all of its strength on marking out a way of life for our people through the allocation of adequateLebensraum for the next one hundred years. Because this space can lie only in the East, the obligation of a naval power takes a back seat. Germany again attempts to fight for its interests by forming a decisive power on land. This goal corresponds equally to the highest national and ethnic requirements."

Adolf Hitler describing his agenda of German expansionism, Hitlers Zweites Buch p.159[37]

The establishment of the empire was to follow the model of theAustrianAnschluss of 1938, just carried out on a greater scale.[38] Goebbels emphasized in April 1940 that the annexed Germanic countries would have to undergo a similar "national revolution" as Germany herself did after theMachtergreifung, with an enforced rapid social and political "co-ordination" in accordance with Nazi principles and ideology (Gleichschaltung).[38]

The ultimate goal of theGleichschaltung policy pursued in these parts of occupied Europe was to destroy the very concepts of individual states and nationalities, just as the concept of a separate Austrian state andnational identity was repressed after theAnschluss through the establishment ofnew state and party districts.[39] The new empire was to no longer be anation-state of the type that had emerged in the 19th century, but instead a "racially pure community".[28] It is for this reason that the German occupiers had no interest in transferring real power to the various far-rightnationalist movements present in the occupied countries (such asNasjonal Samling, theNSB, etc.) except for temporary reasons ofRealpolitik, and instead actively supported radicalcollaborators who favored pan-Germanic unity (i.e. total integration to Germany) overprovincial nationalism (for exampleDeVlag).[40] Unlike Austria and theSudetenland however, the process was to take considerably longer.[41] Eventually these nationalities were to be merged with the Germans into a single ruling race, but Hitler stated that this prospect lay "a hundred or so years" in the future. During this interim period it was intended that the 'New Europe' would be run by Germans alone.[30] According to Speer, while Himmler intended to eventuallyGermanize these peoples completely, Hitler intended not to "infringe on their individuality" (that is,their native languages), so that in the future they would "add to the diversity and dynamism" of his empire.[42] TheGerman language would be itslingua franca however, likening it to the status of English in theBritish Commonwealth.[42]

A primary agent used in stifling the local extreme nationalist elements was theGermanic SS, which initially merely consisted of local respective branches of theAllgemeine-SS inBelgium,Netherlands andNorway.[43] These groups were at first under the authority of their respective pro-Nazi national commanders (De Clercq,Mussert andQuisling), and were intended to function within their own national territories only.[43] During the course of 1942, however, the Germanic SS was further transformed into a tool used by Himmler against the influence of the less extreme collaborating parties and theirSA-style organizations, such as theHird in Norway and theWeerbaarheidsafdeling in the Netherlands.[43][44] In the post-war Germanic Empire, these men were to form the new leadership cadre of their respective national territories.[45] To emphasize their pan-Germanic ideology, theNorges SS was now renamed theGermanske SS Norge, theNederlandsche SS theGermaansche SS in Nederland and theAlgemeene-SS Vlaanderen theGermaansche SS in Vlaanderen. The men of these groups no longer swore allegiance to their respective national leaders, but to thegermanischer Führer ("GermanicFührer"), Adolf Hitler:[43][44]

I swear to you, Adolf Hitler, as Germanic Führer, loyalty and bravery. I pledge you and the superiors which you appointed obedience until death. So help me God.[46]

An illustration of Greater Germanic Reich suggested by Nazi authorities in the propaganda map "Das Grossdeutschland in der Zukunft" (1943). The map depicts occupiedEastern Europe as acolony of Nordic-Germanic settlers.[47]

This title was assumed by Hitler on 23 June 1941, at the suggestion of Himmler.[46] On 12 December 1941 the Dutch right-wing nationalistAnton Mussert also addressed him in this fashion when he proclaimed his allegiance to Hitler during a visit to theReich Chancellery in Berlin.[48] He had wanted to address Hitler asFührer aller Germanen ("Führer of all Germanics"), but Hitler personally decreed the former style.[46] HistorianLoe de Jong speculates on the difference between the two:Führer aller Germanen implied a position separate from Hitler's role asFührer und Reichskanzler des Grossdeutschen Reiches ("Führer andReich Chancellor of the Greater German Reich"), whilegermanischer Führer served more as an attribute of that main function.[48] As late as 1944 occasional propaganda publications continued to refer to him by this unofficial title as well however.[49] Mussert held that Hitler was predestined to become the Führer of Germanics because of his congruous personal history: Hitler originally was an Austrian national, who enlisted in theBavarian army and lost his Austrian citizenship. He thus remainedstateless for seven years, during which, according to Mussert, he was "the Germanic leader and nothing else".[50]

TheSwastika Flag was to be used as a symbol to represent not only theNazi Party, but also the unity of the Nordic-Germanic peoples into a single state.[51] Theswastika was seen by many Nazis as a fundamentally Germanic and European symbol despite its presence among many cultures worldwide.

Hitler had long intended toarchitecturally reconstruct the German capitalBerlin into a new imperial metropolis, which he decided in 1942 to renameGermania upon its scheduled completion in 1950. The name was specifically chosen to make it the clear central point of the envisioned Germanic empire, and to re-enforce the notion of a united Germanic-Nordic state upon the Germanic peoples of Europe.[52] According to records ofHitler's "table talk"[53][54] of 8 June 1942:

Just as theBavarians and thePrussians had to be impressed byBismarck of theGerman idea, so too must theGermanic peoples of continental Europe be steered towards the Germanic concept. He [Hitler] even considers it good that by renaming the Reich capital Berlin into 'Germania', we'll have given considerable driving force to this task. The name Germania for the Reich capital would be very appropriate, for in spite of how far removed those belonging to the Germanic racial core will be, this capital will instill a sense of unity.

— Hitler's Table Talk, 1942

Policies undertaken in Germanic countries

[edit]

Low Countries

[edit]
Further information:Reichskommissariat Niederlande,Military Administration in Belgium and Northern France, andGerman occupation of Luxembourg in World War II

For [Hitler] it is self-evident that Belgium and Flanders and Brabant will likewise be turned into German [provinces]. The Netherlands will also not be allowed to lead a politically independent life ... Whether the Dutch offer any resistance to this or not, is fairly irrelevant.

     –Joseph Goebbels[55]

The German plans of annexation were more advanced for theLow Countries than for theNordic states.Luxembourg andBelgium were both formally annexed into the German Reich during World War II, in 1942 and 1944 respectively, the latter as the newReichsgaue ofFlandern andWallonien (the proposed third one,Brabant, was not implemented in this arrangement) and aBrussels District. On April 5, 1942, while having dinner with an entourage includingHeinrich Himmler, Hitler declared his intention that the Low Countries would be included whole into the Reich, at which point theGreater German Reich would be reformed into theGermanic Reich (simply "the Reich" in common parlance) to signify this change.[23]

In October 1940 Hitler disclosed toBenito Mussolini that he intended to leave theNetherlands semi-independent because he wanted that country to retainits overseas colonial empire after the war.[56] This factor was removed after the Japanese took over theNetherlands East Indies, the primary component of that domain.[56] The resulting German plans for the Netherlands suggested its transformation into aGau Westland, which would eventually be further broken-up into five newGaue orgewesten (historical Dutch term for a type of sub-nationalpolity).Fritz Schmidt, a ranking German official in the occupied Netherlands who hoped to become theGauleiter of this new province on Germany's western periphery stated that it could even be calledGau Holland, as long as theWilhelmus (the Dutchnational anthem) and similarpatriotic symbols were to be forbidden.[57]Rotterdam, which had actually beenlargely destroyed in the course of the1940 invasion was to be rebuilt as the most important port-city in the "Germanic area" due to its situation at the mouth of theRhine river.[58]

Himmler's personal masseurFelix Kersten claimed that the former even contemplatedresettling the entireDutch population, some 8 million people in total at the time, to agricultural lands in theVistula andBug River valleys ofGerman-occupied Poland as the most efficient way of facilitating their immediate Germanization.[59] In this eventuality he is alleged to have further hoped to establish anSS Province of Holland in vacated Dutch territory, and to distribute all confiscated Dutch property and real estate among reliable SS-men.[60] However this claim was shown to be a myth byLoe de Jong in his bookTwo Legends of the Third Reich.[61]

The position in the future empire of theFrisians, another Germanic people, was discussed on 5 April 1942 in one ofHitler's many wartime dinner-conversations.[23] Himmler commented that there was ostensibly no real sense of community between the different indigenous ethnic groups in the Netherlands. He then stated that theDutch Frisians in particular seemed to hold no affection for being part of anation-state based on theDutch national identity, and felt a much greater sense of kinship with their German Frisian brethren across theEms River inEast Frisia, an observation Field MarshalWilhelm Keitel agreed with based on his own experiences.[23] Hitler determined that the best course of action in that case would be to unite the two Frisian regions on both sides of the border into a single province, and would at a later point in time further discuss the topic withArthur Seyss-Inquart, thegovernor of theGerman regime in the Netherlands.[23] By late May of that year these discussions were apparently concluded, as on the 29th he pledged that he would not allow theWest-Frisians to remain part of Holland, and that since they were "part of the exact same race as the people of East Frisia" had to be joined into one province.[62]

Hitler consideredWallonia to be "in reality German lands" which were gradually detached from theGermanic territories by the FrenchRomanization of theWalloons, and that Germany thus had "every right" to take these back.[3] Before the decision was made to include Wallonia in its entirety, several smaller areas straddling the traditionalGermanic-Romance language border in Western Europe were already considered for inclusion. These included the smallLëtzebuergesh-speaking area centred onArlon,[63] as well as theLow Dietsch-speaking region west ofEupen (the so-calledPlatdietse Streek) around the city ofLimbourg, historical capital of theDuchy of Limburg.[64]

Nordic countries

[edit]
Further information:Reichskommissariat Norwegen,Occupation of Denmark,Sweden during World War II,Military history of Finland during World War II, andOperation Ikarus

After their invasion inOperation Weserübung, Hitler vowed that he would never again leave Norway,[58] and favored annexingDenmark as a German province even more due to its small size and relative closeness to Germany.[65] Himmler's hopes were an expansion of the project so thatIceland would also be included among the group of Germanic countries which would have to be gradually incorporated into the Reich.[65] He was also among the group of moreesoteric Nazis who believed either Iceland orGreenland to be the mystical land ofThule, a purported original homeland of the ancientAryan race.[66] From a military point of view, the Kriegsmarine command hoped to see theSpitsbergen, Iceland, Greenland, theFaroe Isles and possibly theShetland Isles (which were also claimed by theQuisling regime[67]) under its domination to guarantee German naval access to themid-Atlantic.[68]

There was preparation for the construction of a new German metropolis of 300,000 inhabitants calledNordstern ("North Star") next to the Norwegian city ofTrondheim. It would be accompanied by a new naval base that was intended to be Germany's largest.[58][69] This city was to be connected to Germany proper by anAutobahn across theLittle andGreat Belts. It would also house anart museum for the northern part of the Germanic empire, housing "only works ofGerman artists."[70]

Sweden's future subordination into the 'New Order' was considered by the regime.[71] Himmler stated that the Swedes were the "epitome of the Nordic spirit and the Nordic man", and looked forward to incorporating central andsouthern Sweden to the Germanic Empire.[71] Himmler offerednorthern Sweden, with itsFinnish minority, toFinland, along with the Norwegian port ofKirkenes, although this suggestion was rejected byFinnish Foreign MinisterWitting.[72][73]Felix Kersten claimed that Himmler had expressed regret that Germany had not occupied Sweden during Operation Weserübung, but was certain that this error was to be rectified after the war.[74] In April 1942, Goebbels expressed similar views in his diary, writing that Germany should have occupied the country during its campaign in the north, as "this state has no right to national existence anyway".[75] In 1940,Hermann Göring suggested that Sweden's future position in the Reich was similar to that ofBavaria in theGerman Empire.[71] The ethnically SwedishÅland Islands, whichwere awarded to Finland by theLeague of Nations in 1921, were likely to join Sweden in the Germanic Empire. In the spring of 1941, the Germanmilitary attaché inHelsinki reported to his Swedish counterpart that Germany would needtransit rights through Sweden for the imminent invasion of the Soviet Union, and in the case of finding her cooperative would permit the Swedish annexation of the islands.[76] Hitler did veto the idea of acomplete union between the two states of Sweden and Finland, however.[77]

Despite the majority of its people being ofFinnic origin, Finland was given the status of being an "honorary Nordic nation" (from aNazi racial perspective, not anational one) by Hitler as reward for its military importance in theongoing conflict against theSoviet Union.[77] TheSwedish-speaking minority of the country, who in 1941 comprised 9.6% of the total population, were considered Nordic and were initially preferred overFinnish speakers in recruitment for theFinnish Volunteer Battalion of the Waffen-SS.[78] Finland's Nordic status did not mean however that it was intended to be absorbed into the Germanic Empire, but instead expected to become the guardian of Germany'snorthernflank against the hostile remnants of a conquered USSR by attaining control overKarelian territory,occupied by the Finns in 1941.[77] Hitler also considered theFinnish and Karelian climates unsuitable for German colonization.[79] Even so, the possibility of Finland's eventual inclusion as afederated state in the empire as a long-term objective was mulled over by Hitler in 1941, but by 1942 he seems to have abandoned this line of thinking.[79] According to Kersten, as Finland signedan armistice with the Soviet Union and broke off diplomatic relations with her formerbrother-in-arms Germany in September 1944, Himmler felt remorse for not eliminating the Finnish state, government and its "masonic"leadership sooner, and transforming the country into a "National Socialist Finland with a Germanic outlook".[80]

Switzerland

[edit]
Further information:Operation Tannenbaum

The same implicit hostility towardneutral nations such as Sweden was also held towardsSwitzerland. Goebbels noted in his diary on December 18, 1941, that "It would be a veritable insult toGod if they [the neutrals] would not only survivethis war unscathed while themajor powers make such great sacrifices, but also profit from it. We will certainly make sure that this will not happen."[81]

TheSwiss people were seen by Nazi ideologists as a mere offshoot of the German nation, although one led astray bydecadentWestern ideals ofdemocracy andmaterialism.[82] Hitler decried the Swiss as "a misbegotten branch of ourVolk" and the Swiss state as "a pimple on the face of Europe" deeming them unsuitable for settling the territories that the Nazis expected to colonize inEastern Europe.[83]

Himmler discussed plans with his subordinates to integrate at least theGerman-speaking parts of Switzerland completely with the rest of Germany, and had several persons in mind for the post of aReichskommissar for the 're-union' of Switzerland with the German Reich (in analogy to the office thatJosef Bürckel held afterAustria's absorption into Germany during theAnschluss). Later this official was to subsequently become the newReichsstatthalter of the area after completing its total assimilation.[2][84] In August 1940,Gauleiter ofWestfalen-SouthJosef Wagner and the Minister-President ofBadenWalter Köhler spoke in favor of the amalgamation of Switzerland toReichsgau Burgund (see below) and suggested that the seat of government for this new administrative territory should be the dormantPalace of Nations inGeneva.[85]

Operation Tannenbaum, a military offensive intended to occupy all of Switzerland, most likely in co-operation withItaly (which itself desired theItalian-speaking areas of Switzerland), was in the planning stages during 1940–1941. Its implementation was seriously considered by the German military after thearmistice with France, but it was definitively shelved after the start ofOperation Barbarossa had directed the attention of theWehrmacht elsewhere.[86]

Eastern France

[edit]
Further information:German military administration in occupied France during World War II,Vichy France, andAtlantic Wall
Western Europe in the time ofCharles V (1525): the German part of theHoly Roman Empire is marked by the red borders.

In the aftermath of theMunich Agreement, Hitler and French Prime MinisterÉdouard Daladier in December 1938 made an agreement that officially declared that Germany was relinquishing its previous territorial claims onAlsace-Lorraine in the interest of maintaining peaceful relations between France and Germany and both pledged to be involved in mutual consultation on matters involving the interests of both countries.[87] However at the same time Hitler in private advised the High Command of the Wehrmacht to prepare operational plans for a joint German–Italian war against France.[87]

Under the auspices ofState SecretaryWilhelm Stuckart theInterior Ministry produced an initial memo for the planned annexation of a strip of eastern France in June 1940, stretching from the mouth of theSomme toLake Geneva,[88] and on July 10, 1940, Himmler toured the region to inspect its Germanization potential.[28] According to documents produced in December 1940, the annexed territory would consist of nineFrench departments, and the Germanization action would require the settlement of a million Germans from "peasant families".[28] Himmler decided thatSouth Tyrolean emigrants (seeSouth Tyrol Option Agreement) would be used as settlers, and the towns of the region would receive South Tyrolean place-names such as Bozen,Brixen,Meran, and so on.[89] By 1942 Hitler had, however, decided that the South Tyroleans would be instead used to settle theCrimea, and Himmler regretfully noted "ForBurgundy, we will just have to find another [Germanic] ethnic group."[90]

Hitler claimed French territory even beyond the historical border of the Holy Roman Empire. He stated that in order to ensure German hegemony on the continent, Germany must "also retainmilitary strong points on what was formerly the French Atlantic coast" and emphasized that "nothing on earth would persuade us to abandon such safe positions as those on theChannel coast, captured during the campaign in France and consolidated by theOrganisation Todt."[91] Several major French cities along the coast were given the designationFestung ("fortress"; "stronghold") by Hitler, such asLe Havre,Brest andSt. Nazaire,[92] suggesting that they were to remain under permanent post-war German administration.

However the war ends, France will have to pay dearly, for she caused and started it. She is now being thrown back to her borders of AD 1500. This means that Burgundy will again become part of the Reich. We shall thereby win a province that so far as beauty and wealth are concerned compares more than favorably with any other German province.

— Joseph Goebbels, 26 April 1942,[93]

Atlantic islands

[edit]

During the summer of 1940, Hitler considered the possibility of occupying the PortugueseAzores,Cape Verde andMadeira and the SpanishCanary islands to deny the British a staging ground for military actions against Nazi-controlled Europe.[21][94] In September 1940, Hitler further raised the issue in a discussion with the Spanish Foreign MinisterSerrano Súñer, offering now Spain to transfer one of the Canary islands to German usage for the price ofFrench Morocco.[94] Although Hitler's interest in the Atlantic islands must be understood from a framework imposed by the military situation of 1940, he ultimately had no plans of ever releasing these important naval bases from German control.[94]

It had been alleged by Canadian historian Holger Herwig that both in November 1940 and May 1941, leading into and through to the period in which Japan began planningthe naval attack that would bring the United States into the war,[95] that Hitler had stated that he had a desire to "deploy long-range bombers against American cities from theAzores." Due to their location, Hitler seemed to think that a Luftwaffe airbase located on the Portuguese Azores islands were Germany's "only possibility of carrying out aerial attacks from a land base against the United States", in a period about a year before the May 1942 emergence of theAmerikabomber trans-oceanic range strategic bomber design competition.[96]

Role of Britain

[edit]

United Kingdom

[edit]
Further information:Operation Sea Lion

The one country in Europe that spoke a Germanic language and was not included in the objective of Pan-Germanic unification was theUnited Kingdom,[97] in spite of its near-universal acceptance by the Nazi government as being part of the Germanic world.[98] LeadingNordic ideologistHans F. K. Günther theorized that theAnglo-Saxons had been more successful than the Germans in maintaining racial purity and that the coastal and island areas ofScotland,Ireland,Cornwall andWales had received additional Nordic blood throughNorse raids and colonization during theViking Age, and the Anglo-Saxons ofEast Anglia and Northern England had beenunder Danish rule in the 9th and 10th centuries.[99] Günther referred to this historical process asAufnordung ("additional nordification"), which finally culminated in theNorman conquest of England in 1066.[99] Thus, according to Günther, Britain was thus a nation created by struggle and thesurvival of the fittest among the various Aryan peoples of the isles, and was able to pursue global conquest and empire-building because of its superior racial heredity born through this development.[100]

Hitler professed an admiration for the imperial might of theBritish Empire inZweites Buch as proof of the racial superiority of the Aryan race,[101] hoping that Germany would emulate British "ruthlessness" and "absence of moral scruples" in establishing its own colonial empire in Eastern Europe.[102] One of his primary foreign policy aims throughout the 1930s was to establish a military alliance with both the British as well as the Italians to neutralize France as a strategic threat to German imperialist ambitions foreastwardexpansion into Eastern Europe.[103]

When it became apparent to the Nazi leadership that the United Kingdom was not interested in a military alliance, anti-British policies were adopted to ensure the attainment of Germany's war aims. Even during the war however, hope remained that Britain would in time yet become a reliable German ally.[104] Hitler preferred to see the British Empire preserved as a world power, because itsbreak-up would benefit other countries far more than it would Germany, particularly theUnited States andJapan.[104] Hitler's strategy between 1935 and 1937 for winning Britain over was based upon a German guarantee of defence towards the British Empire.[105] After the war, Ribbentrop testified that in 1935 Hitler made a promise to deliver twelve German divisions to the disposal of Britain for maintaining the integrity of her colonial possessions.[106]

The continued military actions against Britain after the fall of France had the strategic goal of making Britain 'see the light' and conduct anarmistice with theAxis powers, with July 1, 1940, being named by the Germans as the "probable date" for the cessation of hostilities.[107] On May 21, 1940,Franz Halder, the head of theArmy General Staff, after a consultation with Hitler concerning the aims envisaged by the Führer during the present war, wrote in his diary: "We are seeking contact with Britain on the basis of partitioning the world".[108]

One of Hitler's secondary goals for the invasion of Russia was to win over Britain to the German side. He believed that after the military collapse of theSoviet Union, "within a few weeks" Britain would be compelled either to surrender or to join Germany as a "junior partner" in the Axis.[109] Britain's role in this alliance was reserved to support German naval and the plannedAmerikabomber project against the US in a fight forworld supremacy conducted from the Axis power bases of Europe, Africa and the Atlantic.[110] On August 8, 1941, Hitler stated that he looked forward to the eventual day when "England and Germany [march] together against America", and on January 7, 1942, he daydreamed that it was "not impossible" for Britain to quit the war and join the Axis side, leading to a situation where "it will be a German-British army that will chase theAmericans from Iceland".[111] Nazi ideologistAlfred Rosenberg hoped that after the victorious conclusion of the war against the USSR,Englishmen, along with other Germanic peoples, would join the Germans in colonizing the conquered eastern territories.[18]

From a historical perspective, Britain's situation was likened to that which theAustrian Empire found itself in after it was defeated by theKingdom of Prussia atKöniggrätz in 1866.[104] As Austria was thereafter formally excluded fromGerman affairs, so too would Britain be excluded fromcontinental affairs in the event of a German victory. Yet afterwards,Austria-Hungary became a loyal ally of the German Empire in the pre-World War Ipower alignments in Europe, and it was hoped in vain that Britain would come to fulfill this same role for the Third Reich.[104]

However, other evidence suggests that in the case of a successful invasion of Great Britain the occupiers treatment of the British population may not have been as sympathetic. According to captured German documents, the commander-in-chief of the German Army,Walther von Brauchitsch, directed that "The able-bodied male population between the ages of 17 and 45 will, unless the local situation calls for an exceptional ruling, be interned and dispatched to the Continent". The remaining population would have been terrorised, including civilian hostages being taken and the death penalty immediately imposed for even the most trivial acts of resistance, with the UK being plundered for anything of financial, military, industrial or cultural value.[112] After the warOtto Bräutigam of theReich Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories wrote in his book that he had encountered a personal report by GeneralEduard Wagner regarding a discussion withHeinrich Himmler from February 1943, in which Himmler had expressed the intention forEinsatzgruppen to kill about 80% of the populations of France and England after the German victory.[113] At another point, Hitler had on one occasion described the English lower classes "racially inferior".[114]

Channel Islands

[edit]
Further information:German occupation of the Channel Islands

The BritishChannel Islands were to be permanently integrated into the Germanic Empire, and theirmilitary occupation lasted from 30 June 1940 until liberation on 9 May 1945.[115] On July 22, 1940, Hitler stated that after the war, the islands were to be given to the control ofRobert Ley'sGerman Labour Front, and transferred intoStrength Through Joy holiday resorts.[116] German scholar Karl Heinz Pfeffer toured the islands in 1941, and recommended that the German occupiers should appeal to the islanders' Norman heritage and treat the islands as "Germanicmicro-states", whose union with Britain was only an accident of history.[117] He likened the preferred policy concerning the islands similar to the one pursued by the British inMalta, where theMaltese language had been "artificially" supported against theItalian language.[117]

Role of Ireland

[edit]
Further information:Operation Green (Ireland)

Amilitary operation plan for the invasion of Ireland in support ofOperation Sea Lion was drawn up by the Germans in August 1940. Occupied Ireland was to be ruled along with Britain in a temporary administrative system divided into six military-economic commands, with one of the headquarters being situated inDublin.[118] Ireland's future position in the New Order is unclear, but it is known that Hitler would haveunitedNorthern Ireland with the Irish state.[119]

Role of Northern Italy

[edit]
Further information:South Tyrol Option Agreement,Operational Zone of the Adriatic Littoral, andOperational Zone of the Alpine Foothills

Hitler regarded northern Italians to be strongly Aryan,[120] but not southern Italians.[121] The Nazi regime regarded the ancient Romans to have been largely a people of theMediterranean race; however, they claimed that the Roman ruling classes were Nordic, descended from Aryan conquerors from the North; and that this Nordic Aryan minority was responsible for the rise of Roman civilization.[122] The Nazis viewed the downfall of theRoman Empire as being the result of the deterioration of the purity of the Nordic Aryan ruling class through its intermixing with the inferior Mediterranean types that led to the empire's decay.[122] In addition, racial intermixing in the population in general was also blamed for Rome's downfall, claiming that Italians were a hybrid of races, including black African races. Due to the darker complexion of Mediterranean peoples, Hitler regarded them as having traces of Negroid blood and therefore did not have strong Nordic Aryan heritage and were thus inferior to those that had stronger Nordic heritage.[123]

Hitler held immense admiration for theRoman Empire and its legacy.[124] Hitler praised post-Roman era achievements of northern Italians such asSandro Botticelli,Michelangelo,Dante Alighieri, andBenito Mussolini.[125] The Nazis ascribed the great achievements of post-Roman era northern Italians to the presence of Nordic racial heritage in such people who via their Nordic heritage had Germanic ancestors, such as German Foreign Affairs officialAlfred Rosenberg recognizing Michelangelo andLeonardo da Vinci as exemplary Nordic men of history.[126] German official Hermann Hartmann wrote that Italian scientistGalileo Galilei was clearly Nordic with deep Germanic roots because of his blond hair, blue eyes, and long face.[126] Nazi scholars viewed theLadin andFriulian minorities of Northern Italy as being racially, historically and culturally a part of the Germanic world.[127] Hitler viewed Germans as closely linked with Italians:

From the cultural point of view, we are more closely linked with the Italians than with any other people. The art of Northern Italy is something we have in common with them: nothing but pure Germans.The objectionable Italian type is found only in the South, and not everywhere even there. We also have this type in our own country. When I think of them: Vienna-Ottakring, Munich-Giesing, Berlin-Pankow ! If I compare the two types, that of these degenerate Italians and our type, I find it very difficult to say which of the two is the more antipathetic.[128]

The Nazi regime's stances in regards to northern Italy was influenced by the regime's relations with the Italian government, and particularly Mussolini's Fascist regime. Hitler deeply admired and emulated Mussolini and emphasized the racial closeness of his ally Mussolini to Germans of Alpine racial heritage.[129] Hitler regarded Mussolini to not be seriously contaminated by the blood of the Mediterranean race.[125] Other Nazis had negative views of Mussolini and the Fascist regime. The Nazi Party's first leader,Anton Drexler was one of the most extreme in his negative views of Mussolini – claiming that Mussolini was "probably" a Jew and that Fascism was a Jewish movement.[130] In addition there was a perception in Germany of Italians being racially weak, feckless, corrupt and corrupting, bad soldiers as perceived as demonstrated at theBattle of Caporetto in World War I, for being part of the powers that established the Treaty of Versailles, and for being a treacherous people given Italy's abandonment of theTriple Alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary in World War I to join the Entente.[130] Hitler responded to the review of Italy betraying Germany and Austria-Hungary in World War I by saying that this was a consequence of Imperial Germany's decision to focus its attention on upholding the moribund Austro-Hungarian empire while ignoring and disregarding the more promising Italy.[130]

The region of South Tyrol had been a place of contending claims and conflict betweenGerman nationalism andItalian nationalism. One of the leading founders of Italian nationalism,Giuseppe Mazzini, along withEttore Tolomei, claimed that the German-speaking South Tyrolian population were in fact mostly a Germanicized population of Roman origin who needed to be "liberated and returned to their rightful culture".[131] With the defeat ofAustria-Hungary inWorld War I, the peace treaty designated to Italy the South Tyrol, with its border with Austria along theBrenner Pass.[131] The Italian Fascist regime pursuedItalianization of South Tyrol, by restricting use of the German language while promoting the Italian language; promoting mass migration of Italians into the region, encouraged mainly through industrialization; and resettlement of the German-speaking population.[132]

After Mussolini had made clear in 1922 that he would never give up the region of South Tyrol from being in Italy, Hitler accepted this.[133] Hitler inMein Kampf had declared that concerns over the rights of Germans in South Tyrol under Italian sovereignty was a non-issue considering the advantages that would be gained from a German-Italian alliance with Mussolini's Fascist regime.[134] InMein Kampf Hitler also made clear that he was opposed to having a war with Italy for the sake of obtaining South Tyrol.[133] This position by Hitler of abandoning German land claims to South Tyrol produced aggravation among some Nazi Party members who up to the late 1920s found it difficult to accept the position.[133]

On 7 May 1938, Hitler during a public visit toRome declared his commitment to the existing border between Germany (that included Austria upon the Anschluss) and Italy at the Brenner Pass.[135] In 1939, Hitler and Mussolini resolved the problem of self-determination of Germans and maintaining the Brenner Pass frontier by an agreement in which German South Tyroleans were given the choice of either assimilation into Italian culture, or leave South Tyrol for Germany; most opted to leave for Germany.[135]

After KingVictor Emmanuel III of the Kingdom of Italy removed Mussolini from power, Hitler on 28 July 1943 was preparing for the expected abandonment of the Axis for the Allies by the Kingdom of Italy's new government, and was preparing to exact retribution for the expected betrayal by planning to partition Italy.[136] In particular Hitler was considering the creation of a "Lombard State" in northern Italy that would be incorporated into the Greater Germanic Reich, while South Tyrol and Venice would be annexed directly into Germany.[136]

In the aftermath of the Kingdom of Italy's abandonment of the Axis on 8 September 1943, Germany seized andde facto incorporated Italian territories into its direct control.[137]

According to Goebbels in his personal diary on 29 September 1943, Hitler had expressed the idea that the Italian-German border should extend to include the region ofVeneto, after the Kingdom of Italy capitulated to the Allies in September 1943.[138] Veneto was to be made part of the Reich in an "autonomous form", and to benefit from the post-war influx of German tourists.[138] At the time when Italy was on the verge of declaringan armistice with the Allies, Himmler declared toFelix Kersten that Northern Italy, along with theItalian-speaking part of Switzerland, was "bound to eventually be included in Greater Germany anyway".[139]

Whatever was once anAustrian possession we must get back into our own hands. The Italians by their infidelity and treachery have lost any claim to a national state of the modern type.

— Joseph Goebbels, September 1943,[140]

Hitler declared in private talks that the modern Reich should emulate the racial policy of the oldHoly Roman Empire, by annexing the Italian lands and especially Lombardy, whose population had well preserved their original Germanic Aryan character, unlike the lands of East Europe, with its racially alien population, scarcely marked by a Germanic contribution.[141]

After the rescue of Mussolini and the establishment of theItalian Social Republic (RSI), in spite of urging by local German officials, Hitler refused to officially annexSouth Tyrol, instead he decided that the RSI should hold official sovereignty over these territories, and forbade all measures that would give the impression of official annexation of South Tyrol.[142] However, in practice the territory ofSouth Tyrol within the boundaries defined by Germany asOperationszone Alpenvorland that includedTrent,Bolzano, andBelluno, werede facto incorporated into Germany'sReichsgau Tirol-Vorarlberg and administered by itsGauleiterFranz Hofer.[137][143] While the region identified by Germany asOperationszone Adriatisches Küstenland that includedUdine,Gorizia,Trieste,Pola,Fiume (Rijeka), andLjubljana werede facto incorporated intoReichsgau Kärnten and administered by itsGauleiterFriedrich Rainer.[144]

In a supplementary OKW order dated 10 September 1943, Hitler decrees on the establishment of further Operational Zones in Northern Italy, which were the stretch all the way to the French border.[145] UnlikeAlpenvorland andKüstenland, these zones did not immediately receive high commissioners (oberster kommissar) as civilian advisors, but were military regions where the commander was to exercise power on behalf ofArmy Group B.[145] Operation zoneNordwest-Alpen orSchweizer Grenze was located between theStelvio Pass andMonte Rosa and was to contain wholly the Italian provinces ofSondrio andComo and parts of the provinces ofBrescia,Varese,Novara, andVercelli.[146] The zone ofFranzösische Grenze was to encompass areas west of Monte Rosa and was to incorporate the province ofAosta and a part of theprovince of Turin, and presumably also the provinces ofCuneo andImperia.[146]

From Autumn 1943 onward, members of theAhnenerbe, associated with the SS, asserted that archaeological evidence of ancient farmsteads and architecture proved the presence of Nordic-Germanic peoples in the region of South Tyrol in the Neolithic era including prototypical Lombard style architecture, the significance of ancient Nordic-Germanic influence on Italy, and most importantly that South Tyrol by its past and present and historic racial and cultural circumstances, was "Nordic-Germanic national soil".[147]

Expected participation in the colonization of Eastern Europe

[edit]
Further information:Generalplan Ost andWehrbauer
Großdeutsches Reich in 1942, with Reichskommissariat Ostland (upper centre), Reichskommissariat Ukraine (lower right) and (never fully realized) Reichskommissariat Moskowien

Despite the pursued aim of pan-Germanic unification, the primary goal of the German Reich's territorialexpansionism was to acquire sufficientLebensraum (living space) inEastern Europe for the Germanicübermenschen or superior humans. The primary objective of this aim was to transform Germany into a complete economicautarky, the end-result of which would be a state of continent-wide German hegemony over Europe. This was to be accomplished through the enlargement of the territorial base of the German state and the expansion of the German population,[148] and the wholesaleextermination of the indigenousSlavic inhabitants and theGermanisation ofBaltic inhabitants.[149]

[on German colonization of Russia] As for the two or three million men whom we need to accomplish this task, we will find them more quickly than we think. They will come from Germany, Scandinavia, the western countries, and America. I shall no longer be here to see all that, but in twenty years theUkraine will already be a home for twenty million inhabitants besides the natives.

— Adolf Hitler,[150]

Because of their perceived racial worth, the NSDAP leadership was enthusiastic at the prospect of "recruiting" people from the Germanic countries to alsosettle these territories after the Slavic inhabitants would have been driven out.[151] The racial planners were partly motivated in this because studies indicated that Germany would likely not be able to recruit enough colonial settlers for the eastern territories from its own country and other Germanic groups would therefore be required.[149] Hitler insisted however that German settlers would have to dominate the newly colonized areas.[12] Himmler's original plan for theHegewald settlement was to settle Dutch and Scandinavians there in addition to Germans, which was unsuccessful.[152]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Informational notes

[edit]
  1. ^This passage should in all likelihood be interpreted to mean "extendingup to northern Italy", not that it would also include this region. There is no convincing evidence that Hitler intended to include any Italian provinces in the German state before 1943, includingSouth Tyrol.

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^"Utopia: The 'Greater Germanic Reich of the German Nation'". München – Berlin:Institut für Zeitgeschichte. 1999. Archived fromthe original on 21 May 2021.
  2. ^abcRich 1974, pp. 401–402.
  3. ^abcWilliams 2005, p. 209.
  4. ^Cowie, Stuart."To what extent was the outbreak of World War Two, a consequence of failures in British Foreign Policy?".Academia.edu.
  5. ^abElvert 1999, p. 325.
  6. ^Majer, Diemut (2003)."Non-Germans" under the Third Reich: the Nazi judicial and administrative system in Germany and occupied Eastern Europe with special regard to occupied Poland, 1939–1945. JHU Press. pp. 188–189.ISBN 0-8018-6493-3..
  7. ^Strobl 2000, pp. 202–208.
  8. ^André Mineau. Operation Barbarossa: Ideology and Ethics Against Human Dignity. Rodopi, 2004. p. 36.
  9. ^Rolf Dieter Müller,Gerd R. Ueberschär.Hitler's War in the East, 1941–1945: A Critical Assessment. Berghahn Books, 2009. p. 89.
  10. ^Bradl Lightbody.The Second World War: Ambitions to Nemesis. London; New York: Routledge, 2004. p. 97.
  11. ^abcBohn 1997, p. 7.
  12. ^abWright 1968, p. 115.
  13. ^Hitler 2000, p. 225.
  14. ^Housden 2000, p. 163.
  15. ^Grafton et al 2010, p. 363.
  16. ^Hitler, Pol Pot, and Hutu Power: Distinguishing Themes of Genocidal Ideology Professor Ben Kiernan, Holocaust and the United Nations Discussion Paper
  17. ^Hitler 2000, p. 307.
  18. ^abcdeFest 1973, p. 685.
  19. ^Robert Cecil,The Myth of the Master Race: Alfred Rosenberg and Nazi Ideology p. 199.ISBN 0-396-06577-5
  20. ^Hitler 1927, p. 1.
  21. ^abFest 1973, p. 210.
  22. ^Fink 1985, pp. 27, 152.
  23. ^abcdefHitler 2000, p. 306.
  24. ^abcHattstein 2006, p. 321.
  25. ^Hamann, Brigitte (1999).Hitler's Vienna: A Dictator's Apprenticeship. Trans. Thomas Thornton. New York: Oxford University Press.ISBN 978-0-19-512537-5.
  26. ^Haman 1999, p. 110
  27. ^abcBrockmann 2006, p. 179.
  28. ^abcdefSager & Winkler 2007, p. 74.
  29. ^Goebbels, p. 51.
  30. ^abcWright 1968, pp. 141–142.
  31. ^Rothwell 2005, p. 31.
  32. ^Lipgens 1985, p. 41.
  33. ^abSpeer 1970, pp. 147–148.
  34. ^abDomarus 2007, p. 158.
  35. ^abcSpeer 1970, pp. 115–116.
  36. ^Rich 1974, p. 318.
  37. ^Hitler, Adolf (2006). "13: The Possible Goals". In L. Weinberg, Gerhard (ed.).Hitler's Second Book (in German). Translated by Smith, Krista (1st English-language ed.). New York, USA: Enigma Books. p. 159.ISBN 978-1-929631-61-2.
  38. ^abWelch 1983, p. 145.
  39. ^Rich 1974, pp. 24–25, 140.
  40. ^See e.g. Warmbrunn 1963, pp. 91–93.
  41. ^Rich 1974, p. 140.
  42. ^abSpeer 1976, p. 47.
  43. ^abcdBramstedt 2003, pp. 92–93.
  44. ^abKroener, Müller & Umbreit 2003, pp. 122–123.
  45. ^Morgan 2003, p. 182.
  46. ^abcDe Jong 1974, p. 181.
  47. ^"Kartenskizze eines zukünftigen Europa unter deutscher Herrschaft" [Sketch map of a future Europe under German rule].Deutsches Historisches Museum. Archived fromthe original on 14 June 2017.
  48. ^abDe Jong 1974, pp. 199–200.
  49. ^Adolf Hitler: Führer aller Germanen. Storm, 1944.
  50. ^Lipgens 1985, p. 101
  51. ^Rich 1974, p. 26.
  52. ^Hitler 2000, p. 400
  53. ^Hillgruber & Picker, p. 182.
  54. ^Hillgruber, Andraes andPicker, Henry (1968)Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier 1941–1942, p. 182. Munich
  55. ^Unpublished fragment fromJoseph Goebbels' diaries, located in the collection of theHoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace, Palo Alto, California
  56. ^abRich 1974, p. 469, note 110.
  57. ^De Jong 1969, Vol. 1, p. 97.
  58. ^abcFest 1973, p. 689.
  59. ^Waller 2002, p. 20.
  60. ^Kersten 1947, pp. 84–85.
  61. ^Louis de Jong, 1972, reprinted in German translation: H-H. Wilhelm and L. de Jong. Zwei Legenden aus dem dritten Reich : quellenkritische Studien, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt 1974, pp 79–142.
  62. ^Hitler (2000), 29th of May 1942.
  63. ^Gildea, Wieviorka & Warring 2006, p. 130.
  64. ^Hamacher, Hertz & Keenan 1989, p. 444.
  65. ^abRothwell 2005, p. 32.
  66. ^Janssens 2005, p. 205.
  67. ^Philip H. Buss, Andrew Mollo (1978).Hitler's Germanic legions: an illustrated history of the Western European Legions with the SS, 1941–1943. Macdonald and Jane's, p. 89
  68. ^Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 286
  69. ^Weinberg 2006, pp. 26–27.
  70. ^Weinberg 2005, pp. 26–27.
  71. ^abcLeitz 2000, p. 52.
  72. ^Ackermann 1970, p. 191.
  73. ^Kersten 1957, p. 143.
  74. ^Rich 1974, p. 500.
  75. ^Goebbels, Joseph (1970).The Goebbels Diaries, 1942–1943. Greenwood Press.ISBN 9780837138152 – via Google Books.
  76. ^Griffiths 2004, pp. 180–181.
  77. ^abcRich 1974, p. 401.
  78. ^Nieme, Jarto; Pipes, Jason."Finnish Volunteers in the Wehrmacht in WWII".Feldgrau. Retrieved15 October 2010.
  79. ^abBoog 2001, p. 922.
  80. ^Kersten 1947, pp. 131, 247.
  81. ^Urner 2002, p. x.
  82. ^Halbrook 1998, pp. 24–25.
  83. ^Hitler 2000.
  84. ^Fink 1985, pp. 71–72.
  85. ^Hans Rudolf Fuhrer (1982).Spionage gegen die Schweiz. Huber. p. 68.ISBN 3-274-00003-5.
  86. ^Halbrook 1998, p. 151.
  87. ^abNazi Foreign Policy, 1933–1941: The Road to Global War. p. 58.
  88. ^Schöttler 2003, pp. 83–131.
  89. ^Steininger 2003, p. 67.
  90. ^Rich 1974, p. 384.
  91. ^Rich 1974, p. 198.
  92. ^Zaloga 2007, p. 10.
  93. ^Goebbels, Joseph (1970).The Goebbels Diaries, 1942–1943. Greenwood Press.ISBN 9780837138152 – via Google Books.
  94. ^abcStegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 211.
  95. ^Gailey, Harry A. (1997).War in the Pacific: From Pearl Harbor to Tokyo Bay. Presidio. p. 68.ISBN 0-89141-616-1.
  96. ^Duffy, James P.Target America: "Hitler's Plan to Attack the United States". The Lyons Press, 2006.ISBN 978-1-59228-934-9.
  97. ^Rich 1974, p. 398.
  98. ^Strobl 2000, pp. 36–60.
  99. ^abStrobl 2000, p. 84.
  100. ^Strobl 2000, p. 85.
  101. ^Hitler 2003.
  102. ^Strobl 2000, p. 61.
  103. ^W. Bennett, Edward (1979).German Rearmament and the West, 1932-1933. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. pp. 313–315, 449, 450.ISBN 0-691-05269-7.
  104. ^abcdRich 1974, p. 396.
  105. ^Nicosia 2000, p. 73.
  106. ^Nicosia 2000, p. 74.
  107. ^Hildebrand 1973, p. 99.
  108. ^Hildebrand 1973, p. 96.
  109. ^Hildebrand 1973, p. 105.
  110. ^Hildebrand 1973, pp. 100–105.
  111. ^Pinkus 2005, p. 259.
  112. ^Shirer, pp. 782, 943
  113. ^Otto Bräutigam: "So hat es sich zugetragen…" (Holzner Verlag, Germany 1968, p. 590)
  114. ^Adolf Hitler:table talk 5 November 1941 (in:Hitler's Table Talk,Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1953)
  115. ^Rich 1974, p. 421.
  116. ^Sanders 2005, p. xxiv.
  117. ^abSanders 2005, p. 188.
  118. ^Rich 1974, p. 397.
  119. ^Weinberg 2006, p. 35.
  120. ^David Nicholls.Adolf Hitler: A Biographical Companion. ABC-CLIO. p. 211.
  121. ^Hitler: diagnosis of a destructive prophet. Oxford University Press, 2000. p. 418
  122. ^abAlan J. Levine.Race Relations Within Western Expansion. Praeger Publishers, 1996. p. 97.
  123. ^Andrew Vincent.Modern Political Ideologies. John Wiley & Sons, 2009, p. 308.
  124. ^Alex Scobie.Hitler's State Architecture: The Impact of Classical Antiquity. pp. 21-22.
  125. ^abR J B Bosworth. Mussolini's Italy: Life Under the Dictatorship, 1915-1945
  126. ^abDavid B. Dennis.Inhumanities: Nazi Interpretations of Western Culture. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 17-19.
  127. ^Wedekind 2006, pp. 113, 122–123.
  128. ^Rich 1974, p. 317.
  129. ^Richard Breiting, Adolf Hitler, Édouard Calic (ed.).Secret conversations with Hitler:the two newly-discovered 1931 interviews. John Day Co., 1971. p. 77.
  130. ^abcR. J. B. Bosworth.Mussolini. Bloomsbury, 2014.
  131. ^abJens Woelk, Francesco Palermo, Joseph Marko.Tolerance Through Law: Self Governance and Group Rights In South Tyrol. Leiden, Netherlands: Koninlijke Brill NV, 2008. p. 5.
  132. ^Jens Woelk, Francesco Palermo, Joseph Marko.Tolerance Through Law: Self Governance and Group Rights In South Tyrol. Leiden, Netherlands: Koninlijke Brill NV, 2008. p. 6.
  133. ^abcChristian Leitz.Nazi Foreign Policy, 1933-1941: The Road to Global War. London, England, UK; New York, New York, USA: p. 10.
  134. ^H. James Burgwyn.Italian foreign policy in the interwar period, 1918–1940. Wesport, Connecticut, USA:Greenwood Publishing Group, 1997. p. 81.
  135. ^abRolf Steininger.South Tyrol: A Minority Conflict of the Twentieth Century. p. 49.
  136. ^abAllen Welsh Dulles, Neal H. Petersen, United States.Office of Strategic Services. Bern Office.From Hitler's Doorstep: The Wartime Intelligence Reports of Allen Dulles, 1942-1945. Pennsylvania State Press, 1996.
  137. ^abDr Susan Zuccotti, Furio Colombo. TheItalians and the Holocaust: Persecution, Rescue, and Survival.University of Nebraska Press paperback edition, 1996. p. 148.
  138. ^abPetacco 2005, p. 50.
  139. ^Kersten 1947, p. 186.
  140. ^Rich 1974, pp. 320, 325
  141. ^Norman Cameron, R. H. Stevens. Hitler's Table Talk, 1941-1944: His Private Conversations. Enigma Books, 2000. p. 287.
  142. ^Rolf Steininger.South Tyrol: A Minority Conflict of the Twentieth Century. p. 69.
  143. ^Giuseppe Motta.The Italian Military Governorship in South Tyrol and the Rise of Fascism. English translation edition. Edizioni Nuova Cultura, 2012. p. 104.
  144. ^Arrigo Petacco.Tragedy Revealed: The Story of Italians from Istria, Dalmatia, and Venezia Giulia, 1943-1956. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 2005. p. 50.
  145. ^abKroener, Müller, Umbreit (2003),Germany and the Second World War: Volume V/II: Organization and Mobilization in the German Sphere of Power: Wartime Administration, Economy, and Manpower Resources 1942-1944/5, p. 79,ISBN 0-19-820873-1
  146. ^abWedekind 2003,Nationalsozialistische Besatzungs- und Annexionspolitik in Norditalien 1943 bis 1945, pp. 100–101
  147. ^Ingo Haar, Michael Fahlbusch. German Scholars and Ethnic Cleansing, 1919-1945. p. 130.
  148. ^Rich 1974, p. 331.
  149. ^abMadajczyk.
  150. ^Rich 1974, p. 329.
  151. ^Poprzeczny 2004, p. 181.
  152. ^Nicholas 2006, pp. 330-331

Bibliography

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Organisation
History
Ideology
  • Aestheticization of politics
  • Anti-communism
  • Anti-intellectualism
  • Anti-liberalism
  • Anti-pacifism
  • Blood and soil
  • Chauvinism
  • Class collaboration
  • Conspiracism
  • Corporatism
  • Counter-Enlightenment
  • Cult of personality
  • Dictatorship
  • Direct action
  • Market intervention
  • Eugenics
  • Geopolitik
  • Heimat
  • Imperialism
  • Militarism
  • Morality
  • Nationalism
  • New Man
  • New Order
  • One-party state
  • Populism
  • Propaganda
  • Prussianism
  • Racism
  • Reactionary modernism
  • Romanticism
  • Social Darwinism
  • Social interventionism
  • Social order
  • State capitalism
  • Syncretism
  • Totalitarianism
  • Volksgemeinschaft
  • Volk ohne Raum
  • Volkskörper
  • Politicians
    Ideologues
    Atrocities
    and war crimes
    Outside
    Germany
    Lists
    Role and impact in
    German society
    Related
    topics
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greater_Germanic_Reich&oldid=1316719819"
    Categories:
    Hidden categories:

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp