The northern Balkans in 1683, before the war. The northwestern portion is shown as belonging to the Habsburgs, the bulk of the Balkans under the Ottomans, with the far-northeastern area being Polish. Habsburg Empire Ottoman EmpireThe northern Balkans, after theTreaty of Karlowitz. Habsburg Empire Ottoman Empire
TheGreat Turkish War (German:Großer Türkenkrieg) orThe Last Crusade,[9] also called in Ottoman sourcesThe Disaster Years (Turkish:Felaket Seneleri) andSmall Apocalypse (Turkish:Küçük Kıyamet),[10] was a series of conflicts between theOttoman Empire and theHoly League consisting of theHoly Roman Empire,Poland-Lithuania,Venice,Russia, andthe Kingdom of Hungary. Intensive fighting began in 1683 and ended with the signing of theTreaty of Karlowitz in 1699. The war was a resounding defeat for the Ottoman Empire, which for the first time lost substantial territory, inHungary and thePolish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, as well as in part of the westernBalkans. The war was significant also for being the first instance of Russia joining an alliance withWestern Europe. Historians have labeled the war as theFourteenth Crusade launched against the Turks by the papacy.[11]
The French did not join the Holy League, as France had agreed to reviving an informalFranco-Ottoman alliance in 1673, in exchange forLouis XIV being recognized as a protector of Catholics in the Ottoman domains.
Initially, Louis XIV took advantage of the conflict to extend France's eastern borders, seizing Luxembourg in theWar of the Reunions, but deciding that it was unseemly to be fighting the Holy Roman Empire at the same time of its struggle with the Ottomans, he agreed to theTruce of Ratisbon in 1684. However, as the Holy League made gains against the Ottoman Empire, capturingBelgrade by 1688, the French began to worry that their Habsburg rivals would grow too powerful and eventually turn on France. Therefore, the French besiegedPhilippsburg on 27 September 1688, breaking the truce and triggering the separateNine Years' War against theGrand Alliance, which included theDutch Republic, theHoly Roman Empire and, after theGlorious Revolution, England as well. The war drew Imperial resources to the west and relieved the Turks. This was partially compensated by the entrance of Russia into the war in 1687. While the war started off with the Ottomans facing Imperial forces in the west, the Venetians to the south, and Poland-Lithuania to the north, the majority of Turkish forces were always on the western front and Imperial troops also served on the other fronts.
As a result, the advance made by the Holy League stalled, allowing the Ottomans toretake Belgrade in 1690. The war then fell into a stalemate, and peace was concluded in 1699, which began following theBattle of Zenta in 1697 when an Ottoman attempt to retake their lost possessions in Hungary was crushed by the Holy League.
The war largely overlapped with theNine Years' War (1688–1697), which took up the vast majority of the Habsburgs' attention while it was active. In 1695, for instance, the Holy Roman Empire states had 280,000 troops in the field, with England, the Dutch Republic, and Spain contributing another 156,000, specifically to the conflict against France. Of those 280,000, only 74,000, or about one quarter, were positioned against the Turks; the rest were fighting France.[12] Overall, from 1683 to 1699, the Imperial States had on average 88,100 men fighting the Turks, while from 1688 to 1697, they had on average 127,410 fighting the French.[13]
In August 1672, SultanMehmed IV, who knew that the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth was weakened by internal conflicts,attacked Kamenets Podolski, a large city on the border of the Commonwealth. The small Polish force resisted the siege of Kamenets for two weeks but was then forced to surrender. The Polish army was too small to resist the Ottoman invasion and could score only some minor tactical victories. After three months, the Poles were forced to sign theTreaty of Buchach in which they agreed to cede Kamenets,Podolia and to pay tribute to the Ottomans. When the news of the defeat and treaty terms reachedWarsaw, theSejm refused to pay the tribute and organized a large army under Sobieski; subsequently, the Poles won theBattle of Khotyn (1673). After the death ofKing Michael in 1673, Sobieski was elected king of Poland. He tried to defeat the Ottomans for four years, with no success. The war ended on 17 October 1676 with theTreaty of Żurawno in which the Turks retained control over only Kamenets-Podolski. This Turkish attack also led in 1676 to the beginning of theRusso-Turkish Wars.
After a few years of peace, the Ottoman Empire, encouraged by successes in the west of thePolish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, attacked theHabsburg monarchy. The Turks almost captured Vienna, butJohn III Sobieski led a Christian alliance that defeated them in theBattle of Vienna (1683), stalling the Ottoman Empire's hegemony in south-eastern Europe.
Russia's involvement marked the first time the country formally joined an alliance of European powers. This was the beginning of a series ofRusso-Turkish Wars, the last of which was part ofWorld War I. As a result of theCrimean campaigns andAzov campaigns, Russia captured the key Ottoman fortress ofAzov.
Mustafa II came to power during the war, where he personally commanded the Ottoman Army.
After allied Christian forceshad captured Buda from the Ottoman Empire in 1686 during the Great Turkish War, Serbs fromPannonian Plain (present-dayHungary,Slavonia region in present-dayCroatia,Bačka andBanat regions in present-daySerbia) joined the troops of the Habsburg monarchy as separate units known asSerbian Militia.[16] Serbs, as volunteers, massively joined the Habsburg side.[17] In the first half of 1688, the Habsburg army, together with units of Serbian Militia, capturedGyula,Lippa(today Lipova, Romania) andBorosjenő(today Ienu, Romania) from the Ottoman Empire.[16] After thecapture of Belgrade from the Ottomans in 1688, Serbs from the territories in the south of theSava andDanube rivers began to join Serbian Militia units.[16]
The Roman Catholic bishop and philosopherPjetër Bogdani returned to theBalkans in March 1686 and spent the next years promoting resistance to the armies of the Ottoman Empire, in particular in his nativeKosovo. He and his vicarToma Raspasani played a leading role in the pro-Austrian movement in Kosovo during the Great Turkish War.[18] He contributed a force of 6,000 Albanian soldiers to the Austrian army which had arrived inPristina and accompanied it to capturePrizren. There, however, he and much of his army were met by another equally formidable adversary, the plague. Bogdani returned to Pristina but succumbed to the disease there on 6 December 1689.[19] His nephew, Gjergj Bogdani, reported in 1698 that his uncle's remains were later exhumed by Turkish and Tatar soldiers and fed to the dogs in the middle of the square in Pristina.[20]
Sources from 1690 report that the "Germans" in Kosovo have made contact with 20,000 Albanians who have turned their weapons against the Turks.[21]
Capturing Vienna had long been a strategic aspiration of the Ottoman Empire, because of its interlocking control over Danubian (Black Sea to Western Europe) southern Europe, and the overland (Eastern Mediterranean to Germany) trade routes. During the years preceding this second siege (the first had taken place in 1529), under the auspices ofGrand viziers from the influentialKöprülü family, the Ottoman Empire undertook extensive logistical preparations, including the repair and establishment of roads and bridges leading into the Holy Roman Empire and its logistical centres, as well as the forwarding of ammunition, cannon and other resources from all over the Ottoman Empire to these centres and into the Balkans. Since 1679, theGreat Plague had been ravaging Vienna.
The main Ottoman army finally laid siege to Vienna on 14 July 1683. On the same day,Kara Mustafa Pasha sent the traditional demand for surrender to the city.[22]Ernst Rüdiger Graf von Starhemberg, leader of the garrison of 15,000 troops and 8,700 volunteers with 370 cannon, refused to capitulate. Only days before, he had received news of the mass slaughter atPerchtoldsdorf,[23] a town south of Vienna, where the citizens had handed over the keys of the city after having been given a similar choice. Siege operations started on 17 July.
On 6 September, the Poles under John III Sobieski crossed the Danube 30 km north-west of Vienna atTulln to unite with the Imperial troops and the additional forces from Saxony,Bavaria,Baden,Franconia, andSwabia.Louis XIV of France declined to help hisHabsburg rival, having justannexed Alsace. An alliance between Sobieski and the EmperorLeopold I resulted in the addition of the Polish hussars to the already existing allied army. The command of the forces of European allies was entrusted to the Polish king, who had under his command 70,000–80,000 soldiers facing a Turkish army of 150,000.[24]: 661 Sobieski's courage and remarkable aptitude for command were already known in Europe.
Europe after Battle of Vienna
During early September, the experienced 5,000 Ottomansappers had repeatedly blown up large portions of the walls between the Burgbastion, the Löbel bastion and the Burgravelin, creating gaps of about 12m in width. The Viennese tried to counter this by digging their own tunnels to intercept the depositing of large amounts of gunpowder in caverns. The Ottomans finally managed to occupy the Burg ravelin and the low wall in that area on 8 September. Anticipating a breach in the city walls, the remaining Viennese prepared to fight in the inner city.
The relief army had to act quickly to save the city and so prevent another long siege. Despite the binational composition of the army and the short space of only six days, an effective leadership structure was established, centred on the Polish king and hisHussars. The Holy League settled the issues of payment by using all available funds from the government, loans from several wealthy bankers and noblemen and large sums of money from the Pope.[25] Also, the Habsburgs and Poles agreed that the Polish government would pay for its own troops while still in Poland, but that they would be paid by the Emperor once they had crossed into Imperial territory. However, the Emperor had to recognise Sobieski's claim to first rights of plunder of the enemy camp in the event of a victory.
Kara Mustafa Pasha was less effective at ensuring his forces' motivation and loyalty, and preparing for the expected relief-army attack. He had entrusted defence of the rear to theKhan of Crimea and his light cavalry force, which numbered about 30,000–40,000. There is doubt as to how far the Tatars participated in the final battle before Vienna. The Ottomans could not rely on their Wallachian and Moldavian allies.George Ducas,Prince of Moldavia, was captured, whileȘerban Cantacuzino's forces joined the retreat after Sobieski's cavalry charge.[26]: 163
The confederated troops signalled their arrival on theKahlenberg above Vienna with bonfires. Before the battle a Mass was celebrated for the King of Poland and his nobles.
Around 6:00 pm, the Polish king ordered the cavalry to attack in four groups, three Polish and one from the Holy Roman Empire. Eighteen thousand horsemen charged down the hills,the largest cavalry charge in history.[26]: 152 Sobieski led the charge[24]: 661 at the head of 3,000 Polish heavy lancers, the famed "Winged Hussars". TheLipka Tatars, who fought on the Polish side, wore a sprig of straw in their helmets to distinguish themselves from the Tatars fighting on the Ottoman side. The charge easily broke the lines of the Ottomans, who were exhausted and demoralised and soon started to flee the battlefield. The cavalry headed straight for the Ottoman camps and Kara Mustafa's headquarters, while the remaining Viennese garrison sallied out of its defences to join in the assault.[24]: 661
The Ottoman troops were tired and dispirited following the failure of both the attempt at sapping and the assault on the city and the advance of the Holy League infantry on the Turkenschanz.[24]: 661 The cavalry charge was one last deadly blow. Less than three hours after the cavalry attack, the Christian forces had won the battle and saved Vienna. The first Christian officer who entered Vienna was MargraveLudwig of Baden, at the head of his dragoons.[27]
Afterwards, Sobieski paraphrasedJulius Caesar's famous quotationVeni, vidi, vici in saying "Veni, vidi, Deus vicit" – "I came, I saw, God conquered".
After the Ottoman army was defeated at Vienna, the Imperial army and its allied Polish troops began a counteroffensive to conquerOttoman Hungary. After theVictory at Párkány in October 1683,Esztergom was forced to surrender after a short siege.[27]
Field MarshalAeneas de Capraradefeated the Ottoman Army near the city ofKassa in 1685. After the Ottoman field army wasdefeated near Esztergom in 1685, the cities besieged by the Imperial forces could no longer count on relief.Érsekújvár (Nové Zámky)fell on 19 August, soon afterwards also the placesEperjes,Kassa, andTokaj.
In 1686, two years after anunsuccessful siege of Buda, a renewed European campaign was started to enterBuda. In June 1686, the Duke of Lorrainebesieged Buda (Budapest), the centre of Ottoman Hungary and the old royal capital. After resisting for 78 days, the city fell on 2 September, and Turkish resistance collapsed throughout the region as far away asTransylvania and Serbia.
In 1687, the Ottomans raised new armies and marched north once more. However,Charles V, Duke of Lorraine intercepted the Turks at theSecond Battle of Mohács and avenged the loss inflicted over 160 years ago by Suleiman the Magnificent. Such was the scale of their defeat that the Ottoman army mutinied—a revolt which spread toConstantinople. The Grand Vizier,Sarı Süleyman Pasha, was executed and SultanMehmed IV deposed.
Only when the Ottomans suffered yet another disastrous battle at theBattle of Zenta in 1697 did they sue for peace; the resultingTreaty of Karlowitz in 1699 secured territories, the rest of Hungary and overlordship of Transylvania for the Austrians. Throughout Europe Protestants and Catholics hailedPrince Eugene of Savoy as "the savior of Christendom".
The distractions of the war againstLouis XIV had enabled the Turks torecapture Belgrade in 1690. In August 1691, the Austrians, under Louis of Baden, regained the advantage by heavily defeating the Turks at theBattle of Slankamen on the Danube, securing Habsburg possession of Hungary and Transylvania.
While the Ottoman army was in the process of crossing theTisza River near Zenta, it was engaged in a surprise attack by Habsburg Imperial forces commanded by Prince Eugene of Savoy. His victory at Zenta had turned him into a European hero. After a brief raid intoOttoman Bosnia, culminating in thesack of Sarajevo, Eugene returned to Vienna in November 1697 to a triumphal reception.
TheRepublic of Venice had held several islands in the Aegean and the Ionian seas, together with strategically positioned forts along the coast of the Greek mainland since the carving up of theByzantine Empire after theFourth Crusade. However, with the rise of the Ottomans, during the 16th and early 17th centuries, they lost most of these, such asCyprus andEuboea (Negropont) to the Turks. Between 1645 and 1669, the Venetians and the Ottomans fought a long and costlywar over Crete, the last major Venetian possession in the Aegean. During this war, the Venetian commander,Francesco Morosini, came into contact with the rebelliousManiots, for a joint campaign in the Morea. In 1659, Morosini landed in theMorea, and together with the Maniots, he tookKalamata. However, he was soon after forced to return to Crete, and the Peloponnesian venture failed.[citation needed]
In 1683, a new war broke out between the Habsburg monarchy and the Ottomans, with a large Ottoman army advancing towards Vienna. In response to this, aHoly League was formed. After the Ottoman army was defeated in theBattle of Vienna, the Venetians decided to use the opportunity of the weakening of Ottoman power and its distraction in the Danubian front to reconquer its lost territories in the Aegean and Dalmatia. On 25 April 1684, the Most Serene Republic declared war on the Ottomans.[28]
Aware that it would have to rely on its own strength for success, Venice prepared for the war by securing financial and military aid in men and ships fromHospitaller Malta, theDuchy of Savoy, thePapal States, and theKnights of St. Stephen. In addition, the Venetians enrolled large numbers of mercenaries from Italy and the German states, especiallySaxony and Brunswick.
In mid-June, the Venetian fleet moved from the Adriatic towards the Ottoman-heldIonian Islands. The first target was the island ofLefkada (Santa Maura), which fell, after a siege of 16 days, on 6 August 1684. The Venetians, aided by Greek irregulars, then crossed into the mainland and started raiding the opposite shore ofAcarnania. Most of the area was soon under Venetian control, and the fall of the forts ofPreveza andVonitsa in late September removed the last Ottoman bastions.[29] These early successes were important for the Venetians not only for reasons of morale, but because they secured their communications with Venice, denied to the Ottomans the possibility of threatening the Ionian Islands or of ferrying troops via western Greece to the Peloponnese, and because these successes encouraged the Greeks to cooperate with them against the Ottomans.
Nafplion, orNapoli di Romagna, in the mid-16th century
Having secured his rear during the previous year, Morosini set his sights upon the Peloponnese, where the Greeks, especially the Maniots, had begun showing signs of revolt and communicated with Morosini, promising to rise up in his aid. Ismail Pasha, the new military commander of Morea, learned of this and invaded theMani Peninsula with 10,000 men, reinforcing the three forts that the Ottomans already garrisoned, and compelled the Maniots to give up hostages to secure their loyalty.[30] As a result, the Maniots remained uncommitted when, on 25 June 1685, the Venetian army, 8,100 men strong, landed outside the former Venetian fort ofKoroni and laid siege to it. The castle surrendered after 49 days, on 11 August, and the garrison was massacred. After this success, Morosini embarked his troops towards the town ofKalamata, in order to encourage the Maniots to revolt. The Venetian army, reinforced by 3,300 Saxons and under the command of generalHannibal von Degenfeld, defeated a Turkish force of ca. 10,000 outside Kalamata on 14 September, and by the end of the month, all of Mani and much ofMessenia were under Venetian control.[31][32]
In October 1685, the Venetian army retreated to the Ionian Islands for winter quarters, where a plague broke out, something which would occur regularly in the next years, and take a great toll on the Venetian army, especially among the German contingents. In April 1686, the Venetians helped repulse an Ottoman attack that threatened to overrun Mani, and were reinforced from the Papal States andTuscany. The Swedish marshalOtto Wilhelm Königsmarck was appointed head of the land forces, while Morosini retained command of the fleet. On 3 June, Königsmarck tookPylos and proceeded to lay siege thefortress of Navarino. A relief force under Ismail Pasha was defeated on 16 June, and the next day the fort surrendered. The garrison and the Muslim population were transported toTripoli.[33]Methoni (Modon) followed on 7 July, after an effective bombardment destroyed the fort's walls, and its inhabitants were also transferred to Tripoli.[34] The Venetians then advanced towardsArgos andNafplion, which was then the most important town in the Peloponnese. The Venetian army, ca. 12,000 strong, landed around Nafplion between 30 July and 4 August. Königsmarck immediately led an assault upon the hill ofPalamidi, then unfortified, which overlooked the town. Despite the Venetians' success in capturing Palamidi, the arrival of a 7,000 strong Ottoman army under Ismail Pasha at Argos rendered their position difficult. The Venetians' initial assault against the relief army succeeded in taking Argos and forcing the pasha to retreat toCorinth, but for two weeks, from 16 August, Königsmarck's forces were forced to continuously repulse attacks from Ismail Pasha's forces, fight off the sorties of the besieged Ottoman garrison and cope with a new outbreak of plague. On 29 August 1686 Ismail Pasha attacked the Venetian camp, but was heavily defeated. With the defeat of the relief army, Nafplion was forced to surrender on 3 September.[35] News of this major victory were greeted in Venice with joy and celebration. Nafplion became the Venetians' major base, while Ismail Pasha withdrew toAchaea after strengthening the garrisons at Corinth, which controlled the passage to central Greece.[36]
Despite losses to the plague during the autumn and winter of 1686, Morosini's forces were replenished by the arrival of new German mercenary corps fromHanover in spring 1687. Thus strengthened, he was able to move against the last major Ottoman bastion in the Peloponnese, the town ofPatras and thefort ofRion, which along with its twin atAntirrion controlled the entrance to theCorinthian Gulf (the "LittleDardanelles"). On 22 July 1687, Morosini, with a force of 14,000, landed outside Patras, where the new Ottoman commander, Mehmed Pasha, had established himself. Mehmed, with an army of roughly equal size, attacked the Venetian force immediately after it landed, but was defeated and forced to retreat. At this point panic spread among the Ottoman forces, and the Venetians were able, within a few days, to capture the citadel of Patras, and the forts of Rion, Antirrion, andNafpaktos (Lepanto) without any opposition, as their garrisons abandoned them. This new success caused great joy in Venice, and honours were heaped on Morosini and his officers. Morosini received thevictory title "Peloponnesiacus", and a bronze bust of his was displayed in the Great Hall, something never before done for a living citizen.[37] The Venetians followed up this success with the reduction of the last Ottoman bastions in the Peloponnese, including Corinth, which was occupied on 7 August,[38] andMystra, which surrendered later in the month. The Peloponnese was under complete Venetian control, and only the fort ofMonemvasia (Malvasia) in the southeast continued to resist, holding out until 1690.
After a few years of peace, the Ottoman Empire attacked the Habsburg monarchy again. The Turks almost captured Vienna, but King John III Sobieski of Poland led a Christian alliance that defeated them in the Battle of Vienna, which shook the Ottoman Empire's hegemony in south-eastern Europe.[39]
A newHoly League was initiated byPope Innocent XI and encompassed theHoly Roman Empire (headed by the Habsburg monarchy), joined by the Venetian Republic and Poland in 1684 and theTsardom of Russia in 1686. The Ottomans suffered three decisive defeats against the Holy Roman Empire after siege ofBuda: the secondBattle of Mohács in 1687, theBattle of Slankamen in 1691 and the Battle of Zenta a decade later, in 1697.[40]
On the smaller Polish front, after the battles of 1683 (Vienna and Parkany), Sobieski, after his proposal for the League to start a major coordinated offensive, undertook a rather unsuccessful offensive inMoldavia in 1686, with the Ottomans refusing a major engagement and harassing the army. For the next four years Poland would blockade the key fortress atKamenets, and Ottoman Tatars wouldraid the borderlands. In 1691, Sobieski undertook another expedition to Moldavia, with slightly better results, but still with no decisive victories.[41]
The last battle of the campaign was theBattle of Podhajce in 1698, where a Polishhetman namedFeliks Kazimierz Potocki defeated the Ottoman incursion into the Commonwealth. The League won the war in 1699 and forced the Ottoman Empire to sign the Treaty of Karlowitz. The Ottomans thereby lost much of their European possessions, withPodolia (including Kamenets) returned to Poland.
During the war, the Russian army organized theCrimean campaigns of 1687 and 1689, which both ended in Russian defeats.[42] Despite these setbacks, Russia launched theAzov campaigns in 1695 and 1696, and after laying siege to Azov in 1695[43] successfully occupied the city in 1696.
On 11 September 1697, the Battle of Zenta was fought just south of the Ottoman ruled town ofZenta. During the battle, Habsburg Imperial forces routed the Ottoman forces while the Ottomans were crossing theTisa River near the town. This resulted in the Habsburg forces killing over 30,000 Ottomans and dispersing the rest. This crippling defeat was the ultimate factor of the Ottoman Empire signing theTreaty of Karlowitz on 22 January 1699, ending the Great Turkish War. This treaty resulted in the transfer of most of Ottoman Hungary to the Habsburgs, and after further losses in theAustro-Turkish War (1716–1718), prompted the Ottomans to adopt a more defensive military policy in the following century.[44]
The war caused a profound psychological revolution on Ottoman Mentality and Military culture. TheGhazi mentality of an open border, which involved perpetual aggression against non-Islamic territory, and which had characterized the Ottoman state from its beginning, was terminated and the Ottoman borders with the west became closed borders.[45][46]
According toHalil İnalcık, the Ottoman defeat also convinced the Ottoman elites, who hitherto "belittled everything about Europe", that the western civilization was superior.[47] The Caliphate mostly found itself in retreat after 1699.[48] In the words ofVoltaire, the resounding defeat at the battle of Zenta, which was the last of the war, "Humbled the Ottoman pride".[49] The defeat at Zenta marked the last time an Ottoman caliph personally led an army.
For the victorious Christian powers, the war marked the end of the Ottoman threat, this was signalled by the beginning of export of weapons to Ottoman territory by the Holy League members.[50]
^Podhorodecki, Leszek (2001),Wiedeń 1683, Bellona, p. 105
^Jeremy Black,The Cambridge Illustrated Atlas of Warfare: Renaissance to Revolution, 1492-1792, (Cambridge University Press, 1996), 36.
^Forst de Battaglia, Otto (1982),Jan Sobieski, Mit Habsburg gegen die Türken, Styria Vlg. Graz, p. 215 of 1983 Polish translated ed
^Jack Levy, "War in the Modern Great Power System, 1495-1975", University Press of Kentucky 1983, p. 88-89
^Clodfelter, Micheal (2008). "Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1492–2015" (2017 ed.). McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-7470-7. Page 59.
^Clodfelter, Micheal (2008). "Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1492–2015" (2017 ed.). McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-7470-7. Page 59.
^Treasure, Geoffrey 1985,The making of modern Europe, 1648–1780, Methuen & Co, 614.
^Sicker, Martin 2001,The Islamic world in decline, Praeger Publishers, 32.
^abcGavrilović, Slavko (2006),"Isaija Đaković"(PDF),Zbornik Matice Srpske za Istoriju (in Serbian), vol. 74, Novi Sad:Matica Srpska, Department of Social Sciences, Proceedings i History, p. 7, archived fromthe original(PDF) on 16 September 2011, retrieved21 December 2011,U toku Velikog bečkog rata, naročito posle oslobođenja Budima 1686. srpski narod u Ugarskoj, Slavoniji, Bačkoj, Banatu, [...] priključivao se carskim trupama i kao "rašanska, racka" milicija učestvovao u borbama [...] u Lipi, Jenovi i Đuli...carska vojska i srpska milicija oslobodile su u proleće i leto 1688, [...] U toku Velikog bečkog rata, ... srpski narod.. od pada Beograda u ruke austrijske vojske 1688. i u Srbiji priključivao se carskim trupama i kao "rašanska, racka" milicija učestvovao u borbama [...] u toku 1689–1691. borbe su prenete na Banat. Srbe u njima predvodio je vojvoda Novak Petrović
^Janićijević, Jovan (1996),Kulturna riznica Srbije (in Serbian), IDEA, p. 70,ISBN978-8675470397,Велики или Бечки рат Аустрије против Турске, у којем су Срби, као добровољци, масовно учествовали на аустријској страни
^Iseni, Bashkim (2008).La question nationale en Europe du Sud-Est : genèse, émergence et développement de l'indentité nationale albanaise au Kosovo et en Macédoine. Bern: P. Lang.ISBN978-3-03911-320-0.OCLC269329200.
^Prifti, Peter R. (2005).Unfinished portrait of a country. Boulder: East European Monographs.ISBN0-88033-558-0.OCLC61822490.
^Heywood, Colin. Writing Ottoman History: Documents and Interpretations. United Kingdom, Taylor & Francis, 2024. pp. 241-242
^Ateş, Sabri. Ottoman-Iranian Borderlands: Making a Boundary, 1843-1914. United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 15-16
^İnalcık, Halil. Turkey and Europe in history. Türkiye, Eren, 2006, p. 190
^Mohammad, Qaisar. From Ottoman to Turk: The Transition from Caliphate to Secular Republic in Turkey. United Kingdom, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019, p. 2
^Morley, John, et al. The Works of Voltaire: Age of Louis XIV. United States, E.R. Du Mont, 1901, p. 274
^Culture and Diplomacy: Ambassadors as Cultural Actors in Ottoman-European Relations from the 16th to the 19th Century. Volume II. Austria, Hollitzer Wissenschaftsverlag, 2023, p. 536
Chasiotis, Ioannis (1975). "Η κάμψη της Οθωμανικής δυνάμεως" [The decline of Ottoman power].Ιστορία του Ελληνικού Έθνους, Τόμος ΙΑ′: Ο ελληνισμός υπό ξένη κυριαρχία, 1669–1821 [History of the Greek Nation] (in Greek). Vol. XI: Hellenism under foreign rule,1669–1821. Athens: Ekdotiki Athinon. pp. 8–51.