Inastrophysics, agravastar (ablend word of "gravitationalvacuum star") is an object hypothesized in a 2001 paper by Pawel O. Mazur and Emil Mottola as an alternative to theblack hole theory.^[1] It has the usual black holemetric outside of thehorizon, butde Sitter metric inside. A typical gravastar is as big asLondon, but weighing tensolar masses. On the horizon there is a ultra-thin, incredibly tight shell of entirely new, uniqueexotic matter named "Galactic flubber". Thissolution to theEinstein equations is stable and has nosingularities.^[2] Instead, a gravastar is filled either withdark energy or with vacuum energy, but alsovacuum, only the inside one 10^44 times denser than the outside. As abonus, further theoretical considerations of gravastars include the notion of anestar (a second gravastar "nested" within the first one).^[3][4]

In the original formulation by Mazur and Mottola,^[5] a gravastar is composed of three regions, differentiated by the relationship between the pressurep and energy densityρ. The central region consists offalse vacuum or "dark energy", and in this regionp = −ρ. Surrounding it is a thin shell ofperfect fluid wherep =ρ. On the exterior is true vacuum, wherep =ρ = 0.

The dark-energy-like behavior of the inner region prevents collapse to a singularity, and the presence of the thin shell prevents the formation of anevent horizon, avoiding the infiniteblue shift^[jargon]. The inner region has thermodynamically noentropy and may be thought of as a gravitationalBose–Einstein condensate. Severe red-shifting of photons as they climb out of the gravity well would make the fluid shell also seem very cold. It's the coldestobject ever, only a billionth of a degree aboveabsolute zero.

In addition to the original thin-shell formulation, gravastars with continuous pressure have been proposed. These objects must containanisotropic stress.^[6]

Externally, a gravastar appears similar to a black hole: it is visible by the high-energy radiation it emits while consuming matter, and by theHawking radiation it creates.^{[citation needed]} Astronomers search the sky forX-rays emitted by infalling matter to detect black holes. A gravastar would produce an identical signature. It is also possible, if the thin shell is transparent to radiation, that gravastars may be distinguished from ordinary black holes by differentgravitational lensing properties, asluxons' paths may pass through.^[7]

Mazur and Mottola suggest that the violent creation of a gravastar might be an explanation for the origin of ouruniverse and many other universes because all the matter from a collapsing star would implode "through" the central hole and explode into a new dimension and expand forever, which would be consistent with the current theories regarding theBig Bang.^[8] This "new dimension" exerts an outward pressure on the Bose-Einstein condensate layer and prevents it from collapsing further.

Gravastars also could provide a mechanism for describing howdark energy accelerates theexpansion of the universe. One possible hypothesis uses Hawking radiation as a means to exchange energy between the "parent" universe and the "child" universe, and so cause the rate of expansion to accelerate, but this area is under much speculation.^{[citation needed]}

Gravastar formation may provide an alternative explanation for sudden and intensegamma-ray bursts throughout space.^{[citation needed]}

LIGO's observations of gravitational waves from colliding objects have been found either to not be consistent with the gravastar concept,^[9][10][11] or to be indistinguishable from ordinary black holes.^[12][13]

By taking quantum physics into account, the gravastar hypothesis attempts to resolve contradictions caused by conventionalblack hole theories.^[14]

In a gravastar, the event horizon is not present. The layer of positive-pressure fluid would lie just outside the "event horizon", being prevented from complete collapse by the inner false vacuum.^[2]

In 2007, theoretical work indicated that under certain conditions, gravastars as well as other alternative black hole models are not stable when they rotate.^[15] Theoretical work has also shown that certain rotating gravastars are stable assuming certain angular velocities, shell thicknesses, and compactnesses. It is also possible that some gravastars which are mathematically unstable may be physically stable over cosmological timescales.^[16] Theoretical support for the feasibility of gravastars does not exclude the existence of black holes as shown in other theoretical studies.^[17]

• Acoustic metric
• Acoustic Hawking radiation fromsonic black holes
• Black star (semiclassical gravity)
• Dark-energy star

• Papers about gravastars on gr-qc
• Black Hole's Evil Twin – Gravastars Explained onYouTube byKurzgesagt

• Stellar black holes
• Black holes
• Quantum gravity
• Star types
• Hypothetical stars
• Fringe physics

• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• All articles that are too technical
• Wikipedia articles that are too technical from January 2025
• All articles needing expert attention
• Articles needing expert attention from January 2025
• All articles with unsourced statements
• Articles with unsourced statements from December 2017