Georgian Labour Party საქართველოს ლეიბორისტული პარტია | |
|---|---|
| Chairman | Shalva Natelashvili |
| Secretary-General | Giorgi Gugava |
| Founded | August 1995 |
| Headquarters | I. Javakhishvili 88,Tbilisi |
| Youth wing | Labour Youth |
| Women's wing | Labourist Women in Georgia |
| Ideology | |
| Political position | Centre-left[1][2][6] |
| National affiliation | United National Council (2007–2008) |
| Colors | Red |
| Seats inParliament | 0 / 150 |
| Municipal Councilors | 0 / 2,058 |
| Website | |
| www | |
TheGeorgian Labour Party (Georgian:საქართველოს ლეიბორისტული პარტია,romanized:sakartvelos leiborist'uli p'art'ia, SLP) is apolitical party inGeorgia that was founded in 1995 byShalva Natelashvili.
The party was established in 1995 by Shalva Natelashvili, a deputy of theParliament of Georgia and a former member of theNational Democratic Party. The party was initially known as "National Rule of Law Union" and operated only in the small mountainous locality where Natelashvili hails from. In 1995, Natelashvili was elected to the parliament from thisDusheti constituency. Later in the same year, Natelashvili renamed the party into the Labor Party of Georgia.[7]
The party became the "strongest force on theleft of the political spectrum" and performed strongly in the1998 local elections.[7] It has been described as having occupied "theprotest-vote niche" in mid- and late- 1990s.[8] In 1998, the GLP received 9% of the votes nationwide and finished on 3rd place behind the rulingUnion of Citizens and theUnion for Revival. In capitalTbilisi, the GLP received 18%, ending up on second place.[9] Despite this, in the1999 Georgian parliamentary election, the party fell short of the electoral threshold to receive the seats in the parliament through theproportional representation.[10] The party blamed the authorities for rigging the elections.[11] Later the Labor Party went on to win the2002 Georgian local elections with theUnited National Movement and theNew Rights Party.[12] In Tbilisi, the GLP finished on first place, winning 25% of the vote.[13]

Despite these successes, the Labor Party has been described as having "extremely weak organizational structure" and lacking notable figures, with only Natelashvili being a recognizable face of the party. Moreover, it began to face competition for the protest vote by other new parties, such as theUnited National Movement.[7] Additionally, Natelashvili's unexplained decision in 2002 to give up the post of the chairman of theTbilisi City Assembly toMikheil Saakashvili of the UNM has been described as damaging the party's potential.[14]
When the alleged electoral fraud during the2003 Georgian parliamentary election resulted in the mass protests, the Labor Party did not join them and condemned its leaders from the UNM andBurjanadze-Democrats parties.[7] After the protests developed into theRose Revolution resulting in the successful removal of then-presidentEduard Shevardnadze from power, the Labor Party suffered a blow to its popularity and it lost dozens of activists.[15] The party's growth in popularity has generally been described as having occurred prior to the Rose Revolution.[16]
The Labor Party has been described associal democratic andleft-wing populist.[1][3][17] In 1990s and early 2000s, the party built its campaigns on representing the "ordinary voter". It heavily drew on theprotest vote and emphasized thesocial justice in its rhetoric.[18] Its electoral programme from this period prioritized fighting "wild capitalism", "dictatorship of transnational companies", and "oligarchic and clan control over the economy". Instead, the party supported state control over the economy and the state monopoly over the oil industry. It particularly emphasized thestate involvement in mining. The party campaigned for abolishing the land tax for peasants and farmers. In foreign policy, the party supported Georgia to be aneutral country.[5][19] The party promised free healthcare, education and social services, as well asnationalization of strategically important facilities, calling for reversing theirprivatization of 1990s. In its 2004 election programme it also supportedbicameralism and the removal of immunity from the MPs, as well as reducing the presidential powers. To stimulate the demographic growth, the party argued for establishing the "family's survival fund" to assist young families. It called for the membership into theEuropean Union andNATO, as well as visa free regime both with Russia and the European Union, with Natelashvili expressing support for "many-sided foreign policy" and having "partnership relations" with Russia.[20][21] By 2010, however, the Labor Party has been described as being "fairly ambivalent on the issue of Russian/Western orientation" and it again proposed military neutrality after the 2008Russo-Georgian War, presenting it as a genuine independence from both Moscow and Washington.[16][22][23] Later the Labor Party again shifted toEuro-Atlanticism.[24]
| Election | Leader | Votes | % | Seats | +/– | Position | Government |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | Shalva Natelashvili | 140,595 | 7.02 | 2 / 235 | Opposition | ||
| 2003 | Shalva Natelashvili | 229,900 | 12.04 | 20 / 235 | Opposition | ||
| 2004 | Shalva Natelashvili | 89,981 | 6.01 | 4 / 150 | Opposition | ||
| 2008 | Shalva Natelashvili | 132,092 | 7.44 | 6 / 150 | Opposition | ||
| 2012 | Shalva Natelashvili | 26,759 | 1.24 | 0 / 150 | Extra-parliamentary | ||
| 2016 | Shalva Natelashvili | 55,208 | 3.14 | 0 / 150 | Extra-parliamentary | ||
| 2020 | Shalva Natelashvili | 19,314 | 1.00 | 1 / 150 | Opposition | ||
| 2024 | Shalva Natelashvili | 15,103 | 0.73 | 0 / 150 | Extra-parliamentary |
| Election year | Candidate | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|
| # of overall votes | % of overall vote | ||
| 2008 | Shalva Natelashvili | 128,589 | 6.49 (#4) |
| 2013 | Shalva Natelashvili | 46,958 | 2.88 (#4) |
| 2018 | Shalva Natelashvili | 59,651 | 3.74 (#4) |
| Election | Votes | % | Seats | +/– |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 151,532 | 8.91 | — | New |
| 2002 | — | — | 152 / 4,801 | — |
| 2006 | — | — | 39 / 1,694 | |
| 2010 | Did not participate | |||
| 2014[25] | 48,862 | 3.45 | 30 / 2,088 | |
| 2017[26] | 49,130 | 3.27 | 17 / 2,043 | |
| 2021[27] | 24,329 | 1.38 | 3 / 2,068 | |
| 2025 | Did not participate | |||
| Year | Votes | % | Seats | +/– | Position | Government |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 46,206 | 17.90 | 12 / 55 | New | 2nd | Government |
| 2002 | 71,145 | 25.50 | 15 / 49 | 1st | Government | |
| 2006 | 32,701 | 10.65 | 1 / 37 | 3rd | Opposition | |
| 2010 | Did not participate | |||||
| 2014 | 11,290 | 3.43 | 0 / 40 | 5th | Extra-parliamentary | |
| 2017 | 15,112 | 3.90 | 0 / 50 | 5th | Extra-parliamentary | |
| 2021 | 6,293 | 1.31 | 0 / 50 | 11th | Extra-parliamentary | |
| 2025 | Did not participate | |||||