George Santos | |
|---|---|
Official portrait, 2022 | |
| Member of theU.S. House of Representatives fromNew York's3rd district | |
| In office January 3, 2023 – December 1, 2023 | |
| Preceded by | Tom Suozzi |
| Succeeded by | Tom Suozzi |
| Personal details | |
| Born | (1988-07-22)July 22, 1988 (age 37) |
| Political party | Republican (2019–2024) Independent (2024–present) |
| Website | House website (archived) |
| Criminal information | |
| Criminal status | Released |
| Convictions | Brazil: felonycheck fraud United States:wire fraud andaggravatedidentity theft |
| Criminal penalty | 87 months in prison (commuted) |
George Anthony Devolder Santos (born July 22, 1988) is an American former politician and convictedfelon. He served as theU.S. representative forNew York's 3rd congressional district from January to December 2023, before he wasexpelled from Congress.
Santos first ran for the seat in2020 as aRepublican, but was defeated by incumbentDemocratic representativeTom Suozzi. After Suozzi opted against seeking re-election in2022, Santos ran again and won, defeating Democrat Robert Zimmerman and becoming the first openlyLGBTQ Republican elected to Congress as a freshman.
Within weeks of Santos's election, news outlets began reporting that much of his biography appeared to be fabricated. Santos admitted to having lied about his education and employment history, while his disclosures about his business activities, income, and personal wealth were inconsistent. Further, Santos had not disclosed his criminal history or the existence of lawsuits against him. Santos was sworn in as a member of the House in January 2023, but faced ongoing media scrutiny as well as demands for his resignation from members of both parties.
Following an investigation by theHouse Ethics Committee and a federalindictment, the House of Representatives voted 311–114 to expel Santos on December 1, 2023. Santos was the first member of Congress expelled without having previously been convicted of a crime or having supported theConfederacy. He is thesixth member of the House to be expelled and the first Republican. Santos pleaded guilty toidentity theft andwire fraud in August 2024. He was sentenced to 87 months in prison in April 2025, which he began serving that July. In October 2025, PresidentDonald Trump commuted Santos' sentence, making him eligible for immediate release.
George Anthony Devolder Santos[a] was born on July 22, 1988,[4][b] to Fátima Alzira Caruso Horta Devolder and Gercino Antônio dos Santos Jr. (known as Junior), both of whom were born in Brazil.[6] He has a younger sister, Tiffany.[7]
His maternal grandparents, Paulo Horta Devolder and Rosalina Caruso Horta Devolder, were also born in Brazil. Three of his four maternal great-grandparents were also born in Brazil, with the other born in Belgium.[6] His mother, Fátima Devolder, immigrated to Florida in 1985, working in agriculture. She later moved to New York City, working as a housekeeper, cook, and nanny.[8][9][c] Gercino Santos was a house painter.[11] Santos has claimeddual citizenship in the U.S. and Brazil.[12][d] In 2013, a Brazilian court described him as American.[14]
Santos has said his family was poor during his childhood, living in a rat-infested basement apartment inJackson Heights, Queens, near a Brazilian immigrant enclave inAstoria. Relatives and friends recall that his parents and an aunt often bought him dolls, toys and clothes despite their money problems.[15] His parents' marriage appears to have ended by 1998, when records in Gercino's native state ofMinas Gerais show that he remarried there. Santos remained close to his mother (living with her intermittently until her death) and maintained infrequent contact with his father.[16] According to a biographer, Santos developed a reputation within his family for deceit and theft during his childhood.[e]
Santos holds aGED (Certificate of High School Equivalency).[21] He attended Primary School 122 (also known as P.S.122 The Mamie Fay School) in Astoria and Intermediate School 125 (also known as I.S. 125 Thomas J. McCann Woodside Intermediate School) inWoodside, Queens.[22][23]
Around 2008, George moved toNiterói in Brazil'sRio de Janeiro Metropolitan Area, where his mother, Fátima, was then living, and lived there until 2011,[12][24] although acquaintances of Santos from that period are unsure whether he lived in Brazil or merely visited. Many knew him as Anthony Devolder. Fátima lived in difficult circumstances, working odd jobs, moving around frequently due to unpaid rent, and obtaining electricity illegally. Santos told people his family had money because his father was a high-paid executive in New York.[25]
A friend from that time says Santos was very involved in localLGBT activism, handing out leaflets and regularly attending meetings of a local activist group andPride parades.[25][f] Two former acquaintances said that he competed as adrag queen in Brazilian beauty pageants in 2008 using the drag name Kitara Ravache,[g][27][28] with one saying that Santos began dressing in drag in 2005. Manoel Antiqueira, who performs in drag as Eula Rochard, recalls Santos returning from a 2007 trip to the U.S. with expensive materials for a dress that were not available in Brazil at the time.[25][h]Santos denied having been a drag queen, calling the allegations "categorically false" and accusing the media of making "outrageous claims about my life";[34] two days later, he said, "No, I was not a drag queen in Brazil, guys. I was young and I had fun at a festival."[35]
While in Brazil, Santos's politics were shaped by his family's support for right-wing politicianJair Bolsonaro, who later became Brazil'spresident. Santos supported Bolsonaro despite hisopen homophobia. The Santoses frequently disparaged Brazil's then-president,Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, on social media. After winning his House election, Santos posted a picture of himself with Bolsonaro's conservative allyCarla Zambelli.[36]
From October 2011 to July 2012, Santos worked as a customer service representative at a call center forDish Network inCollege Point, Queens.[37] Hired for his second-language skills, he handled calls from Portuguese-speaking customers.[38]
The New York Times verified that sometime after 2013, Santos worked for HotelsPro, a subsidiary ofTurkey-headquartered MetGlobal.[39]
Around the time he is reported to have left Harbor City Capital, Santos founded alimited liability company (LLC) called the Devolder Organization, and his reported personal income rose substantially.[i] The company had no public presence when major media investigations commenced, and Santos has given inconsistent explanations of its business.[40]
According to his financial disclosures, Santos was the sole owner and managing member,[j] managing $80 million in assets.[21] On financial disclosure forms, Santos called the organization a "capital introduction consulting" firm.[21] Although based in New York, the company was registered in Florida, where it was dissolved in September 2022 for failing to file annual reports. Santos said that its accountant had missed the annual filing deadline.[41] In 2022, the organization lent Santos's congressional campaign more than $700,000. Santos reported receiving a salary of $750,000 and dividends of $1–$5 million from the company, even though he also claimed that its estimated value was in the same range.[21]
Despite his claims about the organization's size, Santos's financial disclosure forms listed no clients.[21] In July 2022,Dun & Bradstreet estimated Devolder's revenue at less than $50,000.[42] Santos listed himself as theregistered agent for the LLC and listed Florida as his state of residence. The company's mailing address was aMerritt Island apartment[43]
The House Ethics Committee's investigation found that Santos incorporated the LLC in May 2021, although he reported income from it on his 2020 income tax return.[44] The committee found that when Santos applied for a business account, he told the bank that the organization made $800,000 in net profit every year and grossed $1.5 million; his May 2022 campaign financial disclosure said that the company's assets were in the $1-1.5 million range. The organization's 2021 financial statements showed $614 of income and over $14,000 of expenses, amounting to a loss exceeding $13,000, and at the time Santos filed the 2022 disclosure, there was $4 in the company bank account.[k] The committee said that both Santos' personal and business accounts were used for a series of "significant" cash deposits followed by prompt cash withdrawals of similar amounts, and the source of the cash was unclear.[46] The unexplained cash withdrawals amounted to over $240,000.[45]
Santos ran as a Republican for theUnited States House of Representatives inNew York's 3rd congressional district, against Democratic incumbentTom Suozzi, launching his campaign in November 2019.[21] Normally, the Nassau County Republican Committee, known for the tight control that its leadership exercises over often competitive races for its nominations, would have discouraged an unknown candidate with such minimal experience. However, Suozzi was expected to win the race easily, and no other candidates had put their names forward.[47] Santos raised funds, spoke to donor groups, and attended a phone-banking session atMar-a-Lago with Donald Trump's children; his efforts impressed party officials. He bought entire tables at New YorkYoung Republican events. Other candidates making the same rounds noticed that Santos repeatedly exaggerated his fundraising totals, with a wide contrast between what he said and what he reported in his campaign finance disclosure forms.[48]
Suozzi later recalled that he had no doubt he would defeat Santos, an unknown who was not well-funded and who at the time was registered to vote in an area of Queens that was outside the district.[48][49] When reporters pressed him about living outside the district, Santos claimed an address that turned out to be his campaign treasurer's.[48] Because Santos was so little-known in the district, the Suozzi campaign decided not to pay for opposition research, deciding that it would be counterproductive to increase his name recognition.[47] As expected, Suozzi prevailed; he defeated Santos 56% to 43% (a margin of 46,624 votes).[50] Despite Santos's loss, local Republicans were pleasantly surprised by his performance.[51]
Shortly after his loss to Suozzi, Santos formed GADS PAC, aleadership PAC, and began raising money to run for Congress again.[52] Then-New York state Republican chairNick Langworthy noted that "George never stopped being a candidate" and was "spending time at Mar-a-Lago, raising money in different circles".[51] U.S. representativeElise Stefanik endorsed him in August 2021 and helped him raise over $100,000 at a fundraiser.[53]
Some Republicans had reservations about Santos. In mid-2021, one of his former advisors uncovered questionable business practices at Harbor City, but was unable to get press coverage.[47] Late in the year, Santos's campaign commissioned a vulnerability study, which revealed significant issues. Some staff members advised him to drop out; instead, he dismissed the concerns and refused to show his diplomas, leading several staffers to resign.[54][47] Those who stayed became increasingly concerned and asked him to seek professional help.[55]
Despite internal concerns, Santos continued his campaign, donating $185,000 to the county Republican committee, which endorsed him.[48] Suozzi announced he would not seek reelection to Congress in November 2021, improving Republicans' chances of winning the seat.[56] Unopposed for the Republican nomination, Santos ran against Democrat Robert Zimmerman.[57] Zimmerman's campaign had access to a lengthy opposition research file but chose to focus on voter outreach instead.[47]
In September 2022,The North Shore Leader raised questions about Santos's employment, financial disclosures, and claims of wealth, but other media outlets did not report on the matter until after the election.[58] Santos defeated Zimmerman by 20,420 votes, flipping the district and helping Republicans retake the House.[59] After his victory, numerous outlets reported that much of Santos'sbiography appeared fabricated. Santos admitted to lying about his education and employment history, while his financial disclosures were inconsistent.[60][40]
The Santos campaign announced in April 2023 that he would seek re-election in 2024.[61] The state'sConservative and Republican Party chairs said they would not support Santos.[62]
Following the failure of an October 2023 vote to expel him from the House, Santos said he would run again in 2024 even if he was expelled from the House before the election.[63] In November 2023, after the House Ethics Committee's report made further fraud allegations against Santos, he reversed course and announced that he would not seek re-election.[64]
During the2024 State of the Union Address in March, Santos announced that he would run for the House inNew York's 1st congressional district, challenging incumbent RepublicanNick LaLota,[65] who had long advocated for Santos's expulsion or resignation. Santos called LaLota aRINO. "[T]o hold a pathological liar who stole an election accountable," LaLota responded, "I led the charge to expel George Santos. If finishing the job requires beating him in a primary, count me in."[66]
On March 22, 2024, Santos announced his departure from the Republican Party, stating that he, "in good conscience, cannot affiliate myself with a party that stands for nothing and falls for everything." He intended to continue his congressional campaign as anindependent.[67][68] On April 23, 2024, Santos dropped out of the race.[69]

On January 11, only eight days after the start of his tenure, four Republican New York congressmen who had also been elected in 2022—Anthony D'Esposito,Nick LaLota,Nick Langworthy, andBrandon Williams—called for Santos to resign.[70] The other two freshman Republican members of Congress from New York,Marc Molinaro andMike Lawler, followed suit.[71] Joseph Cairo, the chair of the Nassau County Republican Party, also called for Santos to resign, saying that he had "disgraced the House of Representatives, and we do not consider him one of our congresspeople".[70]
Santos refused to resign,[72] and kept the support of Republican House leadership, including former House speakerKevin McCarthy, House majority leaderSteve Scalise, and RepresentativeElise Stefanik (the fourth-highest-ranking House Republican), who relied in part on Santos's vote to support their very narrow (four-seat) House majority.[73][74] McCarthy did not deny Santos committee assignments or impose any penalty on him for the misrepresentations he made during his campaign.[74] Santos was assigned to the committees onsmall business andspace, science, and technology.[75][76] On January 31 (two weeks after the assignments were announced), he announced at a meeting of House Republicans that he was vacating his committee memberships, but said the move was temporary; he never rejoined.[77]
In 2023, Santos voted in favor of the key bills supported by the House Republican leadership.[73] After his indictment in May, House Republican leadership reiterated that they would not seek to force Santos to resign or expel him from the House.[73] A subsequent attempt by Democrats to force a vote on an expulsion resolution was blocked and referred to theCommittee on Ethics.[78]
Later in 2023, House Democrats announced they would introduce a resolution tocensure Santos. Unlike an expulsion, the measure would need only a simple majority to pass. Democrats said that Republicans, who had informally criticized Santos, should have no problem with a censure vote.[79] Five New York Republicans who had already called on Santos to resign—LaLota, Molinaro, D'Esposito, Langworthy and Lawler—said they would vote for censure, as did Ohio RepublicanMax Miller.[80]
Santos was among the 71 Republicans who voted against final passage of theFiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 in the House.[81]
In October, Santos voted to keep McCarthy as speaker when eight Republicans joined with House Democrats toremove him. He refused to supportSteve Scalise as McCarthy's replacement, since the Louisiana congressman had not personally sought Santos's support.[82]

In May 2023, after Santos was indicted on federal charges,Robert Garcia and other House Democrats introduced aresolution to expel Santos from the House, which required a two-thirds vote, or 290 votes, in favor. Because an expulsion motion isprivileged, the Republican House leadership was required to either schedule a vote within twolegislative days, table the proposal or refer it to the Ethics Committee. They introduced a motion to send the resolution to the Ethics Committee.[83][78] The House approved the motion by 221–204 along party lines; seven Democrats voted "present".[78] After Santos was indicted on additional charges in October, D'Esposito introduced a second expulsion resolution, cosponsored by the other five Republican House freshmen from New York.[84] After Rep.Mike Johnson was elected speaker, the sponsors moved to force a floor vote on the resolution.[85]
On November 1, the expulsion motion failed 213–179, with 19 voting present. Support was mostly from Democrats, joined by 24 Republicans, while 31 Democrats joined Republicans in opposing. California representativeKatie Porter, one of those 31, believed that it was wrong to expel Santos before his case had been disposed in the courts or the House Ethics Commission had issued its report. Santos said the result was a victory fordue process and dismissed the resolution as a political stunt by his colleagues anxious about their re-election prospects in 2024.[86]
In the wake of the Ethics Committee's report on Santos two weeks later, Garcia announced he would introduce another expulsion resolution, with the expectation that it would be voted on after theThanksgiving recess. It was seen as possible that some of the representatives who had voted against expelling Santos previously would reconsider their positions in the wake of the report. One, Maryland DemocratJamie Raskin, said he would vote to expel, as "[t]he report's findings are extremely damning".[64]
Rep.Michael Guest, chair of the Ethics Committee, introduced an expulsion resolution of his own after the report was released.[87] Over the holiday recess, Santos said on anX Space that he expected to be expelled the following week when Congress returned.[88] He said he would "wear it like a badge of honor", called Guest a "pussy" and said that no one fromMississippi was going to push a New Yorker out of Congress. Santos said it was hypocritical of the House to expel him.[89]
On December 1, the House voted to pass Guest's resolution to expel Santos, 311–114.[90] Specifically, 206 Democrats and 105 Republicans voted for the resolution, with two Democrats[l] and 112 Republicans voting against his expulsion. Ten representatives did not vote, with two voting present[m] and the rest absent.[91] He is the sixth member of the House to be expelled, the only Republican, and the only member expelled without first being convicted of a federal crime or having supported theConfederacy.[92][93][94][95]
After Suozzi won theFebruary 2024 special election to fill Santos's seat, leaving the House Republicans with an even narrower majority, Santos lashed out at his former Republican colleagues who had voted to expel him in a group text. "I hope you guys are happy with this dismal performance and the 10 million dollars your futile Bull Shit cost the party," Santos wrote. "I look very much forward to seeing most of you lose due to your absolute hate filled campaign to remove me from Congress arbitrarily."[96]
Politically, Santos has aligned himself with Donald Trump.[21] At a March 2019 event held by the conservative#WalkAway Foundation that encouraged members of theLGBTQ community to leave theDemocratic Party, Santos (introducing himself as Anthony Devolder) claimed to have formed a group called United for Trump and askedBlaire White, atransgenderYouTuber, how she could "help educate other trans people from not having to follow the narrative that the media and the Democrats put forward".[97] In 2023, Santos attended a rally of supporters outside the Manhattan courthouse whereTrump was arraigned on felony charges offalsifying business records.[98]
Santos has calledpolice brutality a "made-up concept".[21] In a 2022 speech to the Whitestone Republican Club inWhitestone, Queens, Santos calledabortion "barbaric" and compared it toslavery.[99]
After theOctober 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, Santos said, "I think every inch of the United States at this point should be mapped out again and completely checked. I don't care if we go into apolice state for a couple of months."[100]
On December 19, 2022, after Santos had been elected to Congress but before he had taken office,The New York Times reported that he had lied about many aspects of his biography.[21] His lawyer denied the allegations.[21][101][102] On December 22, New York attorney generalLetitia James announced that an investigation had been opened into Santos.[103]
On December 26, Santos broke his silence with interviews onWABC[104][105] and withThe New York Post.[106][107] He denied being a criminal, saying, "I'm not a fraud. I'm not a criminal who defrauded the entire country and made up this fictional character and ran for Congress".[108] Santos admitted to thePost that he had lied about graduating from college and working forGoldman Sachs andCitigroup. By December 28, federal prosecutors for the Eastern District of New York were investigating Santos's finances, and the Nassau County district attorney was investigating him.[109]
Santos was raised as a Catholic and has identified himself as a Catholic. At various points in his career, however, he has claimed to be "Jewish", "Jew-ish", "half Jewish", anon-observant Jew, "a proudAmerican Jew", and a "Latino Jew".[110]
In a January 2020 appearance onTalking GOP, a cable TV show he co-hosted, Santos claimed his maternal grandfather grew up Jewish, converted to Catholicism before the Holocaust, and raised his children Catholic. While Santos said that he was Catholic and that he was not "trying to claim Jewish heritage", he added, "I believe we are all Jewish, at the end – because Jesus Christ is Jewish. And if you believe in Jesus, and we're all brothers in Christ, I mean". The video resurfaced in early 2023.[111] More specifically, Santos has claimed that his maternal grandparents wereJewish Holocaust refugees who fledSoviet Ukraine and German-occupied Belgium.[112]On December 21, 2022, following Santos's November 2022 election to Congress,The Forward andJewish Insider reported that Santos's claims about his family's alleged Jewish heritage were false.[6][112] His maternal grandparents were born inBrazil, not in Ukraine or Belgium.[6]
During a December 26, 2022 interview, Santos said: "I never claimed to be Jewish. I amCatholic. Because I learned my maternal family had a Jewish background, I said I was 'Jew-ish'".[106] The next day, the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) asserted that Santos would no longer be welcome at RJC events because he had "'deceived' the organization and 'misrepresented' his Jewish heritage".[113] In 2023 media appearances, Santos claimed that his claim to Jewish ancestry was vindicated byDNA test kits; however, he did not reveal the DNA information.[114][115][116]
On his campaign website, Santos wrote that his mother was "the first female executive at a major financial institution", worked in theSouth Tower of the World Trade Center, and died "a few years later" after surviving theSeptember 11 attacks.[117] On her 2003 visa application, however, his mother stated that she had not been in the country since 1999;[118] in June 2001, Fatima reported that she was living in Brazil.[119] Her actual occupation has been described asdomestic worker[120] orhome care nurse.[121][122]
In his February 2023Piers Morgan interview, Santos insisted his mother had been at the World Trade Center the day of the attack. "It's quite insensitive to try to rehash my mother's legacy", he said. "She wasn't one to mislead me ... I stay convinced that's the truth".[123]
Santos falsely claimed to hold abachelor's degree in finance and economics fromBaruch College and to have graduated near the top of his class. His claimed period of attendance overlapped with his time in Brazil.[21][39] In January 2023, Santos falsely told a Republican Party chairman that he had been a "star player" on the Baruch volleyball team (as his LinkBridge supervisor had been), having won the league championship and defeatedYale University. At the time in question, Yale had no men's varsity volleyball team.[124][125][126] In a pre-election radio interview, Santos said his supposed volleyball career led to him needing bothknees replaced.[127][128] Santos later admitted that he had never graduated from college.[60]
Campaign documents claimed that Santos held amaster of business administration (MBA) fromNew York University (NYU) and that he had scored a 710 on theGraduate Management Admission Test (GMAT).[101][39] In a 2020 podcast, Santos claimed to have paid off his MBA student loans by 2020.[129] Peter Hamilton, who lent Santos money in 2014 that had not been repaid, recalled that Santos claimed to be a graduate ofNYU's business school but seemed not to know its name.[120][n]
In his interview with Morgan, Santos said that he lied about his college experience to meet perceived societal expectations. He added that he could not afford to attend college.[123] Santos said he did not know the source of the spurious GMAT score in his résumé published by the Nassau County Republican Committee. Morgan asked why Santos thought he could get away with lying about his education in a congressional election, and Santos replied that no one had raised any questions about his claims during his 2020 campaign.[130] In a February 2023Newsmax interview, Santos blamed his résumé lies on the local Republican Party;[131] later, after expulsion from the House, he said that a campaign staffer had written his résumé.[132]
Santos has called himself a "seasoned Wall Street financier and investor" and said he had worked forCitigroup andGoldman Sachs, but neither company has any record of him.[21] His campaign website stated that he was "an associate asset manager in the real asset division" of Citigroup,[60] but the company sold itsasset management division in 2005, before his claimed period of employment.[21]
Santos worked as a customer service representative at a call center forDish Network inCollege Point, Queens from October 2011 to July 2012, overlapping the time he said he worked at Citigroup.[37][120] He later told theNew York Post that his Citigroup claim was "a poor choice of words" and that a subsequent employer had been in "limited partnerships" with those companies.[106] Acquaintances and coworkers said that Santos claimed his family was wealthy and had extensive real estate holdings in the U.S. and Brazil.[120] He repeated this claim during his 2022 congressional campaign, saying that he and his family owned 13 rental properties in New York. No such properties were listed on his campaign's financial disclosure forms or in public records.[21] Santos later admitted to thePost that the claim was false and that he owned no properties as of the end of 2022.[106]
In a November 2022 interview, Santos discussed the 2016Pulse nightclub shooting that took place in Orlando, saying that his company "lost four employees" there.[133]The New York Times found no connection between the 49 victims killed in the attack and any company named in Santos's biography.[21] In a December 2022 interview, Santos changed his story, saying, "We did lose four people that were going to be coming to work for the company that I was starting up in Orlando".[60]
In August 2023, Santos downplayed the significance of the many false or exaggerated claims he had made related to his job history, saying that he had not posted his résumé online during his campaign. He also noted that "studies show that most people lie on their résumés. It's just unfortunately ... the reality".[134]
During his 2020 campaign, Santos gave his address as a residence inElmhurst,Queens, located outside the district in which he was then seeking office.[120] Santos and his partner later moved to arowhouse inWhitestone, Queens; its owner said they had moved there in July 2020.[120] In March 2022, Santos toldNewsday that he left Whitestone because of an alleged January 2021 vandalism incident.[120] He was registered to vote at the Whitestone address during his congressional campaigns, but did not appear to live there.[21]
In January 2023,Ritchie Torres andDan Goldman, House Democrats from New York, filed an ethics complaint with theHouse Ethics Committee over Santos's financial disclosure reports. In March, the House Ethics Committee announced a formal inquiry and created a subcommittee to investigate allegations of having failed to provide proper financial disclosures to the House, sexual misconduct, and conflict of interest.[135]
In June, the committee announced that it was expanding its investigation to cover the unemployment fraud alleged in the May 2023 federal indictment of Santos.[136] It announced that it had sought the voluntary cooperation of about 40 witnesses and subpoenaed 30 others.[137]
Two months later, Rep.Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the most senior Democrat in the House and a former member of the party's leadership, wrote the Ethics Committee asking they make public whatever they had found so far about Santos. "More than enough time has passed for the [committee] to conduct a fair and accurate assessment of the veracity of the allegations against Rep. Santos and of the scope of his misconduct", he said.[138]
On November 16, the Ethics Committee released its Investigative Subcommittee's report, accusing Santos of fraud similar to what he had already been criminally charged with,[139] such as diverting campaign funds for personal use, as well as money raised for RedStone Strategies, asuper PAC supporting Santos, that donors were told would be used on campaigns. The subcommittee listed some of those personal purposes, including over $4,000 to theHermès luxury goods company, plastic surgery andBotox, payments of personal credit card bills and other debts, travel toAtlantic City andLas Vegas that had no campaign purpose, and a small amount onOnlyFans subscriptions. In a news release accompanying the report, the committee said "[it]s investigation revealed a complex web of unlawful activity involving Representative Santos's campaign, personal, and business finances ... [He] sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit." It believed "there was substantial evidence that Representative Santos violated federal criminal laws, some of which are the subject of the pending charges filed against him in court."[140] Santos subsequently announced he would not run for reelection, although he would remain in Congress for the rest of his term. He called the report "a disgusting politicized smear that shows the depths of how low our federal government has sunk."[64]
After obtaining his high school equivalency diploma, Santos spent time in Brazil. In 2008, he forged checks, stolen from a man his mother was caring for, to buyR$1,313 (about US$700) worth of clothing.[12] He gave his name as Délio.[25] When writing the checks, Santos presented identification bearing his photo but the check owner's name. The store owner became suspicious when the signatures on two checks did not match.[12] A few days later, another young man came in to return a pair of shoes that Délio had bought; the store clerk, who had had to cover the loss, traced Santos through the man'sOrkut profile.[25] Santos later admitted to the theft in a message to the clerk and confessed to police before he was charged withcheck fraud in 2010.[21] The case was archived by a Brazilian court in 2013 because authorities there were unable to locate Santos.[141][142]
In January 2023,Rio de Janeiro prosecutors announced that they would revive the fraud charges since they knew where Santos was.[143][141] In March 2023, prosecutors announced aplea bargain with Santos,[144] and in May 2023, Santos formally settled the bad check charges; under the agreement, agreeing to pay 24,000Brazilian reais (almost US$5,000), with most compensating the defrauded salesman and the remainder donated to charity.[145]
Santos was evicted from rented Queens properties three times in the mid-2010s over unpaid rent, resulting in judgments against him which were not disclosed during his campaigns. In a 2016 case, he told the Queens Housing Court that he was mugged on his way there to pay $2,250 in back rent, but police told him they could not take a report at the time, telling him to return later. TheNew York City Police Department had no record of the incident.[146] In October 2015, an acquaintance who loaned Santos $5,000 for moving expenses obtained asmall claims court judgment ordering him to pay the loan back, but Santos did not settle the matter until 2025, after his expulsion from the House.[120][147] In another eviction case, a Queens court entered a civil judgment of $12,208 against him in 2017.[21][148] In December 2022, he had yet to pay the judgment, saying he "completely forgot about it".[108]
Santos operated ananimal rescue group called Friends of Pets United (FOPU) from 2013 to 2018. Santos's biographer described FOPU as a vehicle for selling puppies and conducting unaccountable fundraising in the name of better-known rescue groups.[149] His official biography described FOPU as a legitimatenon-profit animal rescue organization, but a 2023 investigation byThe New York Times found that the group was never authorized to take animals from New York City shelters, it never registered with theNew York State Department of Agriculture and Markets as required of animal rescue groups, and it never registered as a charity with theInternal Revenue Service or the state of New York, so there were no public disclosures of its finances. Several beneficiaries of FOPU fundraisers toldThe Times that Santos gave them less money than he said he collected and then behaved evasively when asked about it, leading them to suspect him of skimming.[150]
In November 2017, Santos was charged with theft by deception inYork County, Pennsylvania, after bad checks were written to anAmish dog breeder for puppies sold at a FOPU event. The case was dismissed in May 2021 after Santos paid the breeder and his record wasexpunged in November 2021.[151][152][153][154] In January 2023, Santos was accused of stealing about $3,000 donated in 2016 to aGoFundMe fundraiser for life-saving surgery for an impoverished U.S. Navy veteran'sservice dog, which did not receive the surgery and died; GoFundMe banned Santos.[150][155][156][157] In 2023, Santos denied swindling the man in statements toThe Times andSemafor.[158][159] That same year, the FBI said it was investigating the allegations.[160] References to FOPU were removed from Santos's campaign biography after the media started questioning his other activities.[150]
In May 2023, a grand jury in theU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York indicted Santos on 13 criminal charges: seven counts ofwire fraud, three counts ofmoney laundering, one count oftheft of public funds, and two counts ofmaking materially false statements to the House of Representatives. Prosecutors accused Santos of "three distinct schemes": fraudulent solicitation of political contributions, unemployment benefits fraud, and making false statements on the financial disclosure reports he submitted to the House of Representatives. In the fraudulent solicitation scheme, Santos allegedly persuaded two supporters to donate $25,000 each to a limited liability company controlled by him and then used the money for personal expenses. He told them it was aSuper PAC and that the money would buy TV ads to support his campaign. During theCOVID-19 pandemic, Santos also allegedly obtained a total of $24,000 inunemployment benefits from mid-2020 to April 2021 while drawing an annual salary of $120,000.[161][162]
At the arraignment the day the indictment was unsealed, Santos pleaded not guilty and was grantedpretrial release on a $500,000 bond with conditions, including surrendering hispassport and restricting his travel to Long Island, New York City, and Washington, D.C. Afterwards, he told reporters that this was a "witch hunt" and that he was still running for reelection in 2024.[161][163][164]
Prosecutors turned over 80,000 pages of material to Santos's lawyers by June 2023.[165]
The names of the guarantors of Santos's $500,000bail bond were initiallyunder seal.[166] Media outlets sought to unseal the names of the guarantors, a motion Santos opposed.[166][167] District judgeJoanna Seybert denied Santos's appeal and ordered the names unsealed; they were revealed to be Santos's father and aunt.[168][169] They had not been required to put up any cash or property as collateral for the bond but would be liable for the entire amount if Santos fled.[166][168]
In August 2023, Santos said he would not consider a plea deal at the time,[134] but a month later prosecutors told the judge that they were both sharing substantial new evidence with Santos and his lawyer while looking at "possible paths forward" with them, raising speculation regarding a possible plea deal,[170] which Santos has denied.[171]
Nancy Marks, who served as treasurer for Santos's campaign, pled guilty in October.[172] Santos was referred to as "Co-Conspirator No. 1" in her plea agreement, due to the falsifications in his campaign finance reports she admitted to making. "One way or another, the government is going to use that information in his case", said one law professor. Kappel said it was "bad news" for him, noting that the lack of a provision in the agreement that she continue cooperating may indicate that the government has enough evidence implicating Santos to believe her testimony would not be needed to convict him.[173]

Five days after Marks's plea, prosecutors filed a superseding indictment, alleging 10 additional felonies committed by Santos including conspiracy against the United States,wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, credit card fraud, andmoney laundering. These charges stemmed from not only the same effort to deceive the RNC that Marks had admitted to, but the unauthorized use of donor credit cards, the money raised by RedStone by lying about its political status and the purpose of the spending, much of which Santos allegedly converted to personal spending on clothing and other luxury items. In an October 27 court appearance, Santos pleaded not guilty to the new charges.[174]
Santos learned of the additional charges when questioned by reporters after leaving aHouse Republican Conference meeting where he said he had not had access to his phone. He called them "bullshit" and explained that he had not handled any of his campaign finance reports. "I didn't even know what the hell the FEC was" when he first ran for office, Santos said. Later he attributed them to Marks's mistakes and malfeasance.[175][o]
In May 2024, Santos moved to have some of the charges dismissed. The dismissal relied on the Supreme Court ruling in theDubin case that narrowed the applicability of the identity theft statute to cases where the act was at the crux of apredicate offense. His attorneys therefore argued that even if Santos had used the names of others in his FEC filings and credit card charges, as alleged in the indictment, that would not constitute an aggravated identity theft.[177]
On August 19, 2024, Santos pleaded guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft as part of a plea deal in which he also admitted to committing the other crimes with which he was charged in the superseding indictment. "I accept full responsibility for my actions", he told the judge. "I allowed my ambition to cloud my judgment, leading me to make decisions that were unethical and... guilty."[178][179][180]
Santos was initially scheduled for sentencing on February 7, 2025.Federal sentencing guidelines call for 6–8 years for the charges he pleaded to,[178] with a possible maximum of 22 years.[181] He will also be required to pay nearly $375,000 in restitution to victims and forfeit an additional $205,000; if he cannot pay the latter amount, his property may be seized.[178] A month before the sentencing, he asked for it to be postponed six months so he can make enough money from his podcast to pay the restitution.[182] The judge set a new sentencing date of April 25, 10 weeks later.[183]
According toBreon Peace,United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, the plea agreement was secured when Santos agreed to serve at least the two-year minimum required under law for the identity theft charges. While Santos agreed to plead to only two of the 23 counts in the indictment, his admission to the other charges means they can be considered in his sentencing. Peace said Santos also agreed not to appeal any sentence of less than eight years.[181]
Both the government and Santos's lawyers filed sentencing memoranda with the court in April 2025. Prosecutors asked for a sentence of more than seven years, slightly higher than what theFederal Sentencing Guidelines prescribe for his offenses, pointing to the extent of Santos's deception. "He has made a mockery of our election system", they wrote. They also pointed to his Cameo appearances and podcast as evidence Santos was continuing to leverage his crimes for personal gain. His lawyers attributed most of his actions to "a misguided desperation related to his political campaign, rather than inherent malice" and asked for the minimum sentence of two years. One defense attorney called the prosecution's request "draconian". "Long story short," Santos wrote on X, "I will NOT succumb to their soul crushing antics and that makes them furious."[184]
In a later X post, Santos said the DOJ was ignoring the more serious crimes of "the cabal of pedophiles running around in every power structure in the world including the US Government." Two weeks later, prosecutors filed another memo, saying that "this message—which signals defiance and victimhood ... is hardly an expression of 'genuine remorse.'" Santos, they said, was "belligeren[t] ... blaming his situation on everyone except himself."[185]
In response Santos called the DOJ "weaponized" and that its "nonsense memos" were in violation of a court order.[185] He claimed his arguments for a shorter sentence were protected speech under the First Amendment, and that therefore the government should not punish him for them: "My posts may be colorful but they don't justify a sentence triple the norm, and the government should be ashamed of itself for even seeking such a high sentence".[186]
Prosecutors also noted that Santos had yet to pay any of his court-ordered restitution.[186] Days before sentencing, Santos said he was trying to make "some kind of a meaningful attempt" at it. He maintained that he was "genuinely remorseful", and would not ask for afederal pardon from Trump as he did not expect that request to be granted. Due to fears for his safety, he wanted to serve his time in protective custody.[187]
Santos was sentenced to 87 months in federal prison on April 25.[188][189][190] He was ordered to surrender by July 25.[191][192] At the hearing he cried and asked "let me prove that I can still contribute positively to the community I wronged." Judge Seybert was unmoved. "Where is the remorse?" she asked. "Where do I see it?"[147]
Shortly afterwards, his attorney, Joseph Murray, said he was researching how to file an application for executive clemency. Murray added that he believed Santos had been prosecuted primarily because he was a gay Republican who had won a district Biden carried in the 2020 presidential election.[193] Two weeks after being sentenced, Santos told Piers Morgan he was hoping for some sort of relief from Trump.[194] Santos stated that he had given up on seeking a federal pardon in May 2025.[195]
Santos reported as ordered to theFederal Correctional Institution, Fairton, in New Jersey on July 25, 2025.[196]
Within three days of his expulsion from Congress, Santos started offering personalized videos on the websiteCameo. Steven Galanis, one of the co-founders of the website, said that Santos's videos represented one of "the best launches that [the website] ever had". It was noted that the videos could potentially earn him well over "the $174,000 salary he earned as a member of Congress".[197] SenatorJohn Fetterman spent $343 for a Cameo video from George Santos, as a prank against his colleague,Bob Menendez.[198]
ComedianJimmy Kimmel paid for videos to see if "there's a line [that Santos] wouldn't cross". Kimmel aired some of the videos onhis show, after which Santos demanded $20,000 for the right to broadcast, which Kimmel refused to pay.[199] In response, Santos filed suit in February 2024 against Kimmel,ABC (Kimmel's employer), and theWalt Disney Company (ABC's owner) for $750,000, claiming that Kimmel intended to "ridicule" Santos.[200] Six months later, a judge dismissed the suit, saying that Kimmel's actions constituted "political commentary and criticism," which is protected under thefair use doctrine.[201][202] TheSecond Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal in September 2025.[203]
Santos announced in April 2024 that he would revive his Kitara drag persona for Cameo videos, promising to donate 20 percent of the proceeds to charity.[204] TheTunnel to Towers Foundation, one of the charities to which Santos claimed proceeds from the Cameos would be donated, said he had not informed them of his plans prior to making his announcement.[205] Two months later, Santos announced that he had started anOnlyFans account,[206] but the account would not feature any sexual content and would rather be a behind-the-scenes look at his life and work.[207]
In December, Santos launched apodcast,Pants on Fire, with liberal cohost Naja Hall and him discussing various issues. The weekend before the first episode, a video was uploaded showing someone throwing coffee on Santos as he walked throughTimes Square. Santos later admitted the incident was staged to promote the podcast and that he had not intended for it to be uploaded.[208]
After Santos had served a month, it was reported that he had written a letter complaining about prison conditions to theSouth Shore Press, a Long Island news outlet. He specifically cited mold and an air conditioning problem that took a long time to repair, and said prison officials had not taken those complaints seriously.[209] He later complained after prison authorities put him in special housing, which he characterized assolitary confinement, due to what they told him was a threat to his life.[210]
On October 17, 2025, President Donald Trump commuted Santos' sentence, resulting in his immediate release from federal prison.[211] Trump announced the commutation onTruth Social, claiming that although Santos was a '"rogue"', he had been "horribly mistreated" in prison and that a seven-year sentence was excessive. Trump's statement also cited Santos' political beliefs as a reason for the commutation, writing: "At least Santos had the Courage, Conviction, and Intelligence to ALWAYS VOTE REPUBLICAN!"[212]
Some of Santos's former colleagues among the New York Republican House delegation who had supported his expulsion decried the move. "George Santos is a convicted con artist", saidNicole Malliotakis. "I disagree with the commutation". LaLota said "he should devote the rest of his life to demonstrating remorse and making restitution to those he wronged." Richard Osthoff, the naval veteran who drew widespread sympathy over the death of his dog when it was reported that Santos had failed to provide funds raised for surgery, said "I feel like I got personally stabbed in the gut by the president of the United States".[213]
Anne Donnelly, the district attorney in Nassau County, where Santos had committed most of his alleged and pleaded offenses, left open the possibility that he could face state charges. "While the office cannot comment on ongoing investigations," she said in a statement, "suffice it to say that I remain focused on prosecuting political corruption wherever it exists regardless of political affiliation."[214] He could even be charged for the same actions that led to the federal case against him, as theU.S. Constitution does not bar separate state and federal prosecutions for the same conduct. Until 2019, New York law had barred the state from prosecuting anyone for the same transaction that led to a federal conviction. Following Trump's pardon of financierPaul Manafort, a law was passed removing that protection from anyone who received a "reprieve, pardon, or other form of clemency" from the president.[215]
Santos is openly gay.[216][217] He was married to a woman from 2012 to 2019,[218] despite previously beingout, but lived with men he was involved with from 2013 on.[216] Santos did not widely acknowledge his marriage to the woman, a Brazilian national,[219] until it was reported in December 2022.[220] In statements acknowledging the marriage, Santos said that he loved his then-wife; however, he also said that he had been comfortably and openly gay for at least the preceding decade, an assertion broadly supported by friends, former coworkers, and roommates.[60][219][221] Ex-roommate Morey-Parker said that in 2014 the pair were on friendly terms and that they went to social events together. Santos did not deny the marriage, but Santos was also open about his romance with his then-boyfriend and told friends about it.[222]
Santos's coworkers at Dish, who understood him to be gay, speculated in 2012 that perhaps he got married to access his claimed familial wealth, to appease his family's concerns about his sexuality, or to help his wife with her immigration status.[223] Adriana Parizzi, who was a close friend of Santos from Brazil and roommate of his early on in the marriage, says the marriage was purely for immigration purposes and that Santos was paid $20,000 for it.The Washington Post reported that three of Santos's former roommates confirmed this. Santos has denied the allegation.[25] Records show that a filing to dissolve the marriage in May 2013 was withdrawn in December of the same year. Four months later, Santos filed a family-based immigration petition on his wife's behalf; it was approved in July 2014, typically seen as a sign thatUnited States Citizenship and Immigration Services believed the marriage was valid.[219] According to Santos's biographer, the woman has steadfastly refused to talk to the media about her relationship with Santos.[224]
In 2020, Santos said he was living with a partner named Matheus Gerard,[225] whom he has subsequently called his husband.[120][226] Santos says the couple wed in November 2021.[225]
On January 21, 2023,Saturday Night Live featuredBowen Yang as Santos in itscold open andWeekend Update segments.[227] Yang reprised the role on the March 11, 2023, cold open that parodied the red carpet at the2023 Oscars, where Santos would claim to beTom Cruise.[228] He returned on October 21, holding a baby during the cold open built around Rep.Jim Jordan's failed bid to become Speaker of the House,[229] and again on December 3 in the cold open about Santos's expulsion from Congress.[230]
ComedianJon Lovitz portrayed Santos onThe Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon, which resulted in a brief Twitter feud between the two.[231] Santos was portrayed by actorHarvey Guillén onThe Late Show with Stephen Colbert.[232]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Tom Suozzi | 196,056 | 52.6 | |
| Working Families | Tom Suozzi | 9,203 | 2.5 | |
| Independence | Tom Suozzi | 3,296 | 0.9 | |
| Total | Tom Suozzi (incumbent) | 208,555 | 56.0 | |
| Republican | George Santos | 147,461 | 39.6 | |
| Conservative | George Santos | 14,470 | 3.9 | |
| Total | George Santos | 161,931 | 43.5 | |
| Libertarian | Howard Rabin | 2,156 | 0.5 | |
| Total votes | 372,642 | 100 | ||
| Democratichold | ||||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | George Santos | 133,859 | 49.4 | |
| Conservative | George Santos | 11,965 | 4.4 | |
| Total | George Santos | 145,824 | 53.8 | |
| Democratic | Rob Zimmerman | 120,045 | 44.3 | |
| Working Families | Rob Zimmerman | 5,359 | 2.0 | |
| Total | Rob Zimmerman | 125,404 | 46.2 | |
| Total votes | 271,228 | 100 | ||
| Republicangain fromDemocratic | ||||
| Year | Ceremony | Category | Work | Result | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | The Streamer Awards | Best Streamed Collab | Fortnite Friday with ConnorEatsPants | Nominated | [233][234] |
He toldPiers Morgan that his parents could not agree on his first name, so they gave him both. His mother preferred Anthony, and always used it.[2] He used different name combinations at different times, settling on George Santos shortly before his first run for Congress at the suggestion of a local Republican activist, wholiked the sound of it.[3]
SANTOS, George, a Representative from New York; born on July 22, 1988; unsuccessful candidate for election to the One Hundred Seventeenth Congress in 2020; elected as a Republican to the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress (January 3, 2023–present).
O MM. Juiz de Direito, Dr.(a) Ricardo Alberto Pereira – Juiz Titular do Cartório da 2ª Vara Criminal da Comarca de Niterói, Estado do Rio de Janeiro, FAZ SABER que o Promotor de Justiça Titular deste juízo, denunciou o nacional George Anthony Devolder Santos -Nacionalidade Americana – Profissão: Professor – Estado Civil: Solteiro – Data de Nascimento: 22/07/1988 Idade: 25 – Filiação: Pai -Gercino Antonio dos Santos Junior Mãe – Fatima Alzira Caruso Horta Devolder [The Honorable Judge Ricardo Alberto Pereira, Judge of the 2nd Criminal Court of the City of Niterói, State of Rio de Janeiro, DOES NOTICE that the Prosecutor General of this court, denounced the national George Anthony Devolder Santos – American Nationality – Profession: Teacher – Marital Status: Single – Date of Birth: 22/07/1988 Age: 25 – Parentage: Father -Gercino Antonio dos Santos Junior Mother – Fatima Alzira Caruso Horta Devolder ]
a tiny publication on Long Island [...] The North Shore Leader wrote in September, when few others were covering Santos, about his "inexplicable rise" in reported net worth—from essentially nothing in 2020 to as much as $11 million two years later. [...] no one followed its story before Election Day.
The Washington, DC, office and the district offices of former Representative George Santos will continue to serve the people of the Third Congressional District of New York under the supervision of the Clerk of the House of Representatives. Representative George Santos was expelled from Congress on December 1, 2023, pursuant to H. Res. 878.
Republican leaders in Congress have declined to answer questions about the congressman-elect.
In interviews with WABC radio and the New York Post – the first times Santos has spoken publicly about the controversy – he acknowledged that he had fabricated some facts.
I would have never gotten the nomination from the Nassau County GOP if I had not concluded college.
In an interview in December with the political publication City & State, Mr. Santos suggested that he was not openly gay when he first married. 'I did marry young, and I married a young woman at the time, and we pretty much were in love,' he said.
| U.S. House of Representatives | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preceded by | Member of theU.S. House of Representatives fromNew York's 3rd congressional district 2023 | Succeeded by Tom Suozzi |
| U.S. order of precedence (ceremonial) | ||
| Preceded byas Former U.S. Representative | Order of precedence of the United States as Former U.S. Representative | Succeeded byas Former U.S. Representative |