Sir George Buck (orBuc) (c. 1560 – October 1622) was an Englishantiquarian, historian, scholar and author, who served as a Member of Parliament, government envoy toQueen Elizabeth I andMaster of the Revels toKing James I of England.
He served in the war against theSpanish Armada in 1588 and on theCadiz expedition of 1596. He was appointedEsquire of the Body in 1588 and a Member of Parliament forGatton, Surrey in the 1590s, also acting at times as an envoy for Queen Elizabeth. In 1603, on the accession to the throne of King James I, Buck was made a Gentleman of thePrivy Chamber and knighted. In 1606, he began to license plays for publication. In 1610, he became Master of the Revels, responsible for licensing and supervising plays in Britain, including Shakespeare's later plays, and censoring them with respect to the depiction of religion and politics.
Buck's writings include a verse work,Daphnis Polystephanos: An Eclog.... (1605), an historical-pastoral poem in celebration of James I's royal ancestors. His treatise "The Third Vniversite of England" (1615) describes the educational facilities in London. His major prose work wasThe History of King Richard the Third, which he left in rough draft at his death. His great-nephew extensively altered it and finally published it in 1646 as his own work. Buck defendedKing Richard III, examining critically the accusations against him. He also discovered and introduced important new historical sources, especially theCroyland Chronicle and theTitulus Regius, which justified Richard's accession to the crown.
Buck was baptised on 1 October 1560 inHoly Trinity,Ely, Cambridgeshire. He was the eldest son and probably second of the four children of Elizabeth Nunn,née Petterill, ofBrandon Ferry, Suffolk, and Robert Buck (d. 1580), a church official.[2][3] His great-grandfather, Sir John Buck, was executed after supportingRichard III at theBattle of Bosworth Field.[4]
Buck was educated by his half-sister's husband, Henry Blaxton, privately and then at Blaxton's school inChichester.[5] Buck attendedCambridge University, and by 1580 he had undertaken legal studies in London, finishing at theMiddle Temple in 1585.[6] He carried dispatches for the government from France in 1587[7] and served under his patron the Lord Admiral,Charles Howard of Effingham, against the Spanish Armada in 1588 and on the successfulCadiz expedition of 1596 led byRobert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex, also acting as emissary from its commanders toQueen Elizabeth.[8] He was appointedEsquire of the Body in 1588 and was the Member of Parliament forGatton, Surrey in the parliaments of 1593 and 1597. He continued to act as an envoy for the queen afterwards, serving on diplomatic missions toFlanders in 1601 and Spain in 1605.[2][9]
In 1597, the queen seems to have promised Buck the reversion (the right to succeed to an office when it next fell vacant) of the office ofMaster of the Revels.[2][10] The office was held at the time by Buck's relation by marriage,Edmund Tilney.[11] The playwrightJohn Lyly, however, believed that since about 1585 Queen Elizabeth had led him to expect appointment to the post. He was vocal in his distress, writing letters of protest and supplication.[12] The reversion was formally conferred on Buck in 1603, on the accession to the throne ofKing James I.[13] Also upon the accession of James I, Buck was made a Gentleman of thePrivy Chamber and knighted. At the same time, he inherited his aunt's lands in Lincolnshire.[14] In 1606, he began to license plays for publication.[15]
The function of the Master of the Revels was to supervise the arrangements for entertainments presentedat court, at the various royal residences or wherever the monarch was in attendance, and to censor plays before they were performed in public theatres.[2] Buck was thus responsible for censoring, among other works,Shakespeare's later plays, and for supervising performances of them and of any earlier Shakespeare plays revived for court performance, which he had to re-censor, due to the regulations added against blasphemy in 1606. Buck noted on the title page of the playGeorge-a-Greene, the Pinner of Wakefield that he had discussed its authorship with Shakespeare.[16] Censorship was exercised in matters of profanity and in sensitive issues of religion and politics, particularly the portrayal of royalty. Judging from his notes in the two manuscript play scripts that show his hand,The Second Maiden's Tragedy (1611) andJohn van Olden Barnavelt (1619), Buck was conscientious and learned, but gentle in his censorship.[2]
Buck also attended the tournaments ofrunning at the ring at the Jacobean court. This was a semi-theatrical equestrian exercise, where riders competed in teams, winning prizes by lifting a ring with their lances.[17]
Buck wrote a treatise on the "Art of Revels", but the work is lost. He refers to it in another treatise, praising the state of drama in London and writing: "the Art ofReuels ... requireth knowledge in Grammar, Rhetorike, Logicke, Philosophie, Historie, Musick, Mathematikes, & in other Arts ... & hath a setled place within this Cittie. ... I haue discribed it, and discoursed thereof at large in a particular commentarie".[18]
Buck was an historian and minor poet. His main verse work,ΔΑΦΝΙΣ ΠΟΛΥΣΤΕΦΑΝΟΣ (Daphnis Polystephanos): An Eclog Treating of Crownes, and of Garlandes... (1605), an historical-pastoral poem, was written to glorify and celebrate King James I's royal ancestors on the occasion of his coronation.[2] It mentionsRichard III favourably "because / All accusations of him are not proued, / And he built churches, and made good law's / And all men held him wise, and valiant", and it concludes that he deserved his royal rank.[19] Buck's treatise "The Third Vniversite of England" (1615) describes the educational facilities in London, from cosmetology to law and medicine, including heraldry, poetry, music, athletics and drama, and enumerates the diversity of arts, crafts, culture, wealth and populace of the city.[20] This earned him, inWilliam Maitland's estimate, the place afterJohn Stow as an early historian of London.[21] Among his other works wasThe Baron, an extensive treatment of the history of English titles and offices, which is not extant, although some of the material he collected for it survives. His only surviving genealogical work,A Commentary Vpon ... Liber Domus DEI, a finished manuscript, describes the history of the families who came to England withWilliam the Conqueror.[2]
His major prose work wasThe History of King Richard the Third, which he completed in 1619 and left in rough draft at his death, and which, in 1731, was burnt around the edges in theCotton library fire.[22] Before that, the work had suffered more serious damage, coming into the hands of Buck's great-nephew, George Buck, who used it as he did others of Buck's works: he produced manuscript copies that he dedicated to various patrons from whom he sought advancement, passing them off as his own. Gradually he altered theHistory, cutting it, making it look like something written in his own time, rather than earlier, by deleting names of Buck's learned contemporaries who had shared sources andviva voce information with him, and altering or deleting documentation of sources, with the details of which, also, his copyist was careless. Finally in 1646 he published a version of theHistory that was slightly over half the length of the original. A second issue (usually referred to erroneously as a second edition) appeared the next year, leading to the assumption that Buck invented many of his sources.[23] This damaged Buck's scholarly reputation for centuries. The authentic text of Buck'sHistory was not published until 1979; the editor, Arthur Kincaid, was able to find all but seven of the hundreds of sources that Buck had meticulously documented.[24]
Buck originated the pattern adopted by all later defences of Richard III, weighing the evidence impartially and pointing out that suspicion has no weight from a legal point of view. He first summarises Richard's life and reign, then discusses the accusations against him in turn, criticising sources of information about them on the basis of their reasons for bias, referring to original authoritative documents and oral reports. He also discusses the legality of Richard's title and surveys his achievements.[2] Buck discovered and introduced important new historical sources, such as theCroyland Chronicle and through it the petition in Parliament (Titulus Regius) that declared Edward IV's children illegitimate and justified Richard III's accession to the crown[25] – a document that KingHenry VII tried, and almost managed, to suppress.[26]William Camden praised Buck's scholarship, calling him "a man learned in letters and who observed much in histories and shared it with me".[27]
TheExchequer delayed, from 1613, in paying wages to Buck and his Revels Office associates. Buck became unable to discharge his duties as Master of the Revels by March 1622, was declared insane the following month, and was succeeded in office bySir John Astley. He died in October of that year, leaving a considerable estate. His "nephew Stephen Buck presented a will, either forged or made after Sir George became insane, designating himself and his son George the heirs".[2]
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
