Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Gentleman Farm site

Coordinates:41°19′17″N88°40′25″W / 41.32139°N 88.67361°W /41.32139; -88.67361
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromGentleman Farm Site)
Archaeological site in Illinois, United States
Gentleman Farm site
Gentleman Farm site is located in Illinois
Gentleman Farm site
Location inIllinois
Show map of Illinois
Gentleman Farm site is located in the United States
Gentleman Farm site
Location in United States
Show map of the United States
Locationin LaSalle County, Illinois, on theIllinois River
Coordinates41°19′17″N88°40′25″W / 41.32139°N 88.67361°W /41.32139; -88.67361
Area1 acre

TheGentleman Farm site is anarchaeological site located inLaSalle County, Illinois, on theIllinois River. It is a multi-component site with the main occupation being a Langford tradition component ofUpper Mississippian affiliation.[1]

History of archaeological investigations

[edit]

The site was brought to the attention of theIllinois State Museum as it was scheduled to be destroyed during construction of the Bulls Island Cut-Off on theIllinois River. Salvage excavations took place in 1940, but a comprehensive site report was not generated until James A. Brown created one in 1967.[1]

Results of data analysis

[edit]
Langford plain vessel
Langford trailed vessels
Langford noded vessels
Langford bold vessel

Excavations at the site yieldedprehistoric andhistoricartifacts, pitfeatures, animal bone (which was not analyzed) andburials. Two areas of the site were identified; a village area and aburial mound.[1]

Components

[edit]

The main occupation was affiliated with theUpper Mississippian Langford tradition. Earlier occupations were indicated by the presence of a fewprojectile points of earlier type; and aProtohistoric or earlyHistoric occupation was indicated by the recovery of 2 gunflints.[1]

Features

[edit]

There were no house structures noted at the site. Seven pitfeatures were described, categorized into three types:storage pits (4), 1 “ash-filled” pit, and two pits filled with broken stone (akafire-cracked rock) which were interpreted as roasting pits.[1]

The refuse pits were thought to have first been storage pits that were converted into refuse pits once their contents began to sour. They contained animal bone, charcoal and artifacts.

The roasting pits appear to correspond to what has ethnographically been described as “macoupin roasting pits” by the early French explorers Deliette andLaSalle and described from theZimmerman site.[2][3] The macoupins are apparentlytubers from a species ofwater lily, perhaps the American Lotus (Nelumbo lutea).[3] Tubers of Nelumbo lutea have been recovered from similar roasting pits at the Elam[4] andSchwerdt[5][6] sites on theKalamazoo River in westernMichigan; and tubers of the white water lily (Nymphaea tuberosa) have been recovered from roasting pits at theGriesmer site in northwesternIndiana.[7] This particular cooking technique may have been used prehistorically for several species of similar water lilies, or other similar root plants. No tubers were specifically recovered from the Gentleman Farm site, however. This may be because there was no systematic effort by the excavators to collect plant remains.

Burials

[edit]

48burials were excavated during the salvage project. It was estimated based on the density of burials that there were between 200-300 within the entire mound. 19 burials were observed to containgrave goods. The most common type of grave goods werepottery vessels,shell spoons and items of personaladornment.[1]

Artifacts

[edit]

Pottery artifacts

[edit]

Archaeologists often findpottery to be a very useful tool in analyzing a prehistoric culture. It is usually very plentiful at a site and the details of manufacture and decoration are very sensitive indicators of time, space and culture.[8]

Several whole or reconstructable pottery vessels were recovered from the burials, which greatly facilitated the analysis.

Upper Mississippian component
[edit]

A total of 1,498 sherds and complete vessels were collected from the site, of which 96% were identified as Langford ware ofUpper Mississippian affiliation. Also present were vessels identified as Aztalan series and Adams tradition; as well as an unidentified shell-tempered ware.[1]

Langford ware was first reported at the Fisher site, and has also been found at the nearbyZimmerman[3][9] andPlum Island[2] sites. It is characterized by grit-tempered, globular vessels with restricted orifice and well-defined shoulders and excurved rim profiles. Surface finish is usually smoothed and decoration, when present, is applied to the neck and shoulder areas and consists of incised and trailed lines, punctates and finger impressions, combined to form arches and festoons. Lugs and loop handles are present on some vessels and nodes are also sometimes present.[1][2][3][9]

The following types of Langford Ware were reported from the burial mound vessels:[1]

  • Langford plain (2 vessels) – smooth surface with no decoration
  • Langford trailed (5 vessels) – decorated with fine to medium-lined decoration
  • Langford bold (1 vessel) – decorated with wide-lined (aka finger-trailed) decoration
  • Langford noded (3 vessels) – vessels with row of nodes around shoulder
  • Langford plain/thick (61 sherds) – sherds >0.9 mm thick

Other artifacts

[edit]

Non-potteryartifacts recovered from the site included:[1]

  • Chipped stone artifacts – triangularprojectile points, notched or stemmed projectile points,scrapers (including one humpback scraper),knives (various types), gunflints anddrills (one expanding-base and one parallel-sided)
  • Ground stone artifacts – a hematite burnisher and a nut-cracking stone
  • Bone artifacts –deer jaw sickles,awls and other worked bone fragments that could not be easily categorized
  • Antler artifacts – a socketed and tangedprojectile point
  • Shell artifacts – shell spoons (subdivided into variants based on method of manufacture), apendant,scrapers, a hair ornament and discbeads
  • Copper artifacts – ear discs

The non-pottery artifacts found at anarchaeological site can provide usefulcultural context as well as a glimpse into the domestic tasks performed at a site;ceremonial orreligious activities;recreational activities; andclothing or personaladornment.

Some of the most prominent and diagnostic non-pottery artifacts are presented here in more detail:

MaterialDescriptionImageQtyFunction / useComments / associations
Chipped stoneSmall triangularprojectile points (aka Madison points)Projectile points11Hunting/fishing/warfareAlso known as “arrowheads”; are thought to be tips for arrows. The usage of thebow and arrow seems to have greatly increased after A.D. 1000, probably as a result of increased conflict.[10][11]
Chipped stoneHumpbackscraperProjectile points1Domestic function / processing wood or hidesTypical ofUpper Mississippian sites, particularly Huber andOneota (Orr Focus)[7]
Chipped stoneDrill (expanding base)Expanding base drill1Domestic function / processing wood or hidesThe expanding base drill is a common type inUpper Mississippian contexts[7]
AntlerAntler projectile point; socketed and tangedAntler projectile point3Hunting/fishing/warfareThe tanged or barbed type is characteristic of Fisher and Langford traditions; the unbarbed type is more typical ofOneota[7]
ShellShell spoonsShell spoons9Domestic function / food preparation and-or servingThe shell spoons were found asgrave goods in the Gentleman Farm burials; they were also present in theUpper Mississippian Heally Complex at theZimmerman site[3][9]

Significance

[edit]

The Gentleman Farm site is a Langford tradition site like the nearbyZimmerman (Heally component), Fisher (B complex) andPlum Island sites. Although there are noradiocarbon dates available from Gentleman Farm, based on dates obtained from sites with similar artifacts, the site is thought to date to approximately A.D. 1200–1500.[1]

No house structures were present at the site, and based on the lack of household artifacts such as manos and milling stones, it is not thought to be a permanent village. It may have been a specialized site related to building the mound and/or interring the burials.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghijklBrown, James A. (1967).The Gentleman Farm Site, LaSalle County, Illinois. Springfield, Illinois: Illinois State Museum, Reports of Investigations No. 12.
  2. ^abcFenner, Gloria J. (1963). Blumn, Elaine A. (ed.).The Plum Island Site, LaSalle County, Illinois. Urbana, Illinois: Illinois Archaeological Survey, Bulletin No. 4. pp. 1–105.
  3. ^abcdeBrown, James A., ed. (1961).The Zimmerman Site: A Report on Excavations at the Grand Village of Kaskaskia. Springfield, Illinois: Illinois State Museum, Report of Investigations No. 9.
  4. ^DeRoo, Brian (1991).Flotation Data Sampling Strategies in Archaeobotanical Research: An Experiment at the Elam Site (20AE195), Allegan County, Michigan (Masters thesis). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University. p. 23.
  5. ^Cremin, William M. (1980). "The Schwerdt Site: A Fifteenth Century Fishing Station on the Lower Kalamazoo River, Southwest Michigan".The Wisconsin Archaeologist.61:280–292.
  6. ^Cremin, William M. (1983). "Late Prehistoric Adaptive Strategies on the Northern Periphery of the Carolinian Biotic Province: A Case Study from Southwest Michigan".Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology.8:91–107.
  7. ^abcdFaulkner, Charles H. (1972). "The Late Prehistoric Occupation of Northwestern Indiana: A Study of the Upper Mississippi Cultures of the Kankakee Valley".Prehistory Research Series.V (1):1–222.
  8. ^Shepard, Anna O. (1954).Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institute of Washington, Publication 609.
  9. ^abcBrown, Margaret Kimball (1975).The Zimmerman Site: Further Excavations at the Grand Village of the Kaskaskia. Springfield, Illinois: Illinois State Museum, Reports of Investigations No. 32.
  10. ^Mason, Ronald J. (1981).Great Lakes Archaeology. New York, New York: Academic Press, Incl.
  11. ^Lepper, Bradley T. (2005).Ohio Archaeology (4th ed.). Wilmington, Ohio: Orange Frazer Press.

Further reading

[edit]
  • James A. Brown (1967),The Gentleman Farm Site, LaSalle County, Illinois, Illinois State Museum, Reports of Investigations No. 12
Middle
Mississippian
American Bottom
and Upper Mississippi
Lower Ohio River and
Confluence area
Middle Ohio River
Tennessee and
Cumberland
Central and Lower
Mississippi
South Appalachian
Mississippian
Fort Walton culture
Pensacola culture
Plaquemine
Mississippian
Caddoan
Mississippian
Upper Mississippian
cultures
Oneota
Fort Ancient culture
Culture
Agriculture
Artwork
Languages
Religion
Archaeological
cultures
Archaeological
sites
Human
remains
Miscellaneous
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gentleman_Farm_site&oldid=1319437573"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp