Gender is pertinent to many disciplines, such asliterary theory, drama studies,film theory,performance theory, contemporaryart history, anthropology, sociology,sociolinguistics andpsychology. These disciplines sometimes differ in their approaches to how and why gender is studied. In politics, gender can be viewed as a foundational discourse that political actors employ in order to position themselves on a variety of issues.[9] Gender studies is also a discipline in itself, incorporating methods and approaches from a wide range of disciplines.[10]
A number of theorists have influenced the field of gender studies significantly, specifically in terms of psychoanalytic theory.[18] Among these areSigmund Freud,Jacques Lacan,Julia Kristeva, andBracha L. Ettinger. Gender studied under the lens of each of these theorists looks somewhat different. In a Freudian system, women are "mutilated and must learn to accept their lack of a penis" (in Freud's terms a "deformity").[19] Lacan, however, organizes femininity and masculinity according to different unconscious structures. Both male and female subjects participate in the "phallic" organization, and the feminine side of sexuation is "supplementary" and not opposite or complementary.[20] Lacan uses the concept of sexuation (sexual situation), which posits the development of gender-roles and role-play in childhood, to counter the idea that gender identity is innate or biologically determined. According to Lacan, the sexuation of an individual has as much, if not more, to do with their development of a gender identity as being genetically sexed male or female.[21]
Kristeva contends that patriarchal cultures, like individuals, have to exclude the maternal and the feminine so that they can come into being.[22]Bracha L. Ettinger transformed[23][24][25][26][27][28][29] subjectivity in contemporary psychoanalysis since the early 1990s with the Matrixial[30] feminine-maternal and prematernal Eros[31] of borderlinking (bordureliance), borderspacing (bordurespacement) and co-emergence. The matrixial feminine difference defines a particular gaze[32] and it is a source for trans-subjectivity and transjectivity[33] in both males and females. Ettinger rethinks the human subject as informed by the archaic connectivity to the maternal and proposes the idea of a Demeter-Persephone Complexity.[34]
Feminist theorists such asJuliet Mitchell,Nancy Chodorow,Jessica Benjamin,Jane Gallop,Bracha L. Ettinger,Shoshana Felman,Griselda Pollock,[35]Luce Irigaray andJane Flax have developed a Feminist psychoanalysis and argued that psychoanalytic theory is vital to the feminist project and must, like other theoretical traditions, be criticized by women as well as transformed to free it from vestiges of sexism (i.e. beingcensored).Shulamith Firestone, inThe Dialectic of Sex, callsFreudianism the misguided feminism and discusses how Freudianism isalmost completely accurate, with the exception of one crucial detail: everywhere that Freud writes "penis", the word should be replaced with "power".
Critics such asElizabeth Grosz accuseJacques Lacan of maintaining a sexist tradition in psychoanalysis.[36] Others, such asJudith Butler, Bracha L. Ettinger andJane Gallop have used Lacanian work, though in a critical way, to develop gender studies.[37][38][39] According to J. B. Marchand, "The gender studies and queer theory are rather reluctant, hostile to see the psychoanalytic approach."[40] ForJean-Claude Guillebaud, gender studies (and activists of sexual minorities) "besieged" and consider psychoanalysis and psychoanalysts as "the new priests, the last defenders of the genital normality, morality, moralism or even obscurantism".[41]
Judith Butler's worries about the psychoanalytic outlook under which sexual difference is "undeniable" and pathologizing any effort to suggest that it is not so paramount and unambiguous ...".[42] According to Daniel Beaune and Caterina Rea, the gender-studies "often criticized psychoanalysis to perpetuate a family and social model of patriarchal, based on a rigid and timeless version of the parental order".[43]
Psychoanalytically orientedFrench feminism focused on visual and literary theory all along.Virginia Woolf's legacy as well as "Adrienne Rich's call for women's revisions of literary texts, and history as well, has galvanized a generation of feminist authors to reply with texts of their own".[44]Griselda Pollock and other feminists have articulated Myth and poetry[45] and literature,[45][46][47] from the point of view of gender.
The emergence ofpost-modernism theories affected gender studies,[21] causing a movement inidentity theories away from the concept of fixed oressentialist gender identity, topost-modern[48] fluid[49] or multiple identities.[50] The impact ofpost-structuralism, and its literary theory aspect post-modernism, on gender studies was most prominent in its challenge of grand narratives. Post-structuralism paved the way for the emergence ofqueer theory in gender studies, which necessitated the field expanding its purview to sexuality.[51]
In addition to the expansion to include sexuality studies, under the influence of post-modernism gender studies has also turned its lens towardmasculinity studies, due to the work of sociologists and theorists such asR. W. Connell,Michael Kimmel, and E. Anthony Rotundo.[52][53] These changes and expansions have led to some contentions within the field, such as the one between second wave feminists and queer theorists.[54] The line drawn between these two camps lies in the problem as feminists see it of queer theorists arguing that everything is fragmented and there are not only no grand narratives but also no trends or categories. Feminists argue that this erases the categories of gender altogether but does nothing to antagonize the power dynamics reified by gender. In other words, the fact that gender issocially constructed does not undo the fact that there are strata of oppression between genders.
The history of gender studies looks at the different perspectives of gender. This discipline examines the ways in which historical, cultural, and social events shape the role of gender in different societies. The field of gender studies, while focusing on the differences between men and women, also looks at sexual differences and less binary definitions of gender categorization.[55]
Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for Sexual Science) was a German Institution that preexistedNazi rule inGermany. The research based institute was in operation from 1919–1933. The Institute was lost to two waves of attacks that led to the loss of approximately 12,000-20,000 journals, books and articles, with others suggesting larger numbers, not including other media materials.[56][57]
After the universal suffrage revolution of the twentieth century, thewomen's liberation movement of the 1960s and 1970s promoted a revision from the feminists to "actively interrogate" the usual and accepted versions of history as it was known at the time. It was the goal of many feminist scholars to question original assumptions regarding women's and men's attributes, to actually measure them, and to report observed differences between women and men.[58] Initially, these programs were essentially feminist, designed to recognize contributions made by women as well as by men. Soon, men began to look at masculinity the same way that women were looking at femininity, and developed an area of study called "men's studies".[59] It was not until the late 1980s and 1990s that scholars recognized a need for study in the field of sexuality. This was due to the increasing interest in lesbian and gay rights, and scholars found that most individuals will associate sexuality and gender together, rather than as separate entities.[59][60]
Although doctoral programs for women's studies have existed since 1990, the first doctoral program for a potential PhD in gender studies in the United States was approved in November 2005.[61] In 2015,Kabul University became the first university in Afghanistan to offer a master's degree course in gender and women's studies.[62] After theTaliban took over the Afghan capital, the university fell under their control and banned women from attending.[63]
Men's studies is aninterdisciplinaryacademic field devoted to topics concerningmen,gender, andpolitics. It often includes feminist theory, men's history andsocial history, men's fiction,men's health, feminist psychoanalysis and the feminist and gender studies-influenced practice of most of thehumanities andsocial sciences. Timothy Laurie andAnna Hickey-Moody suggest that there 'have always been dangers present in the institutionalisation of "masculinity studies" as a semi-gated community', and note that 'a certain triumphalism vis-à-vis feminist philosophy haunts much masculinities research'.[64]
Within studies on men, it is important to distinguish the specific approach often defined as Critical Studies on Men. This approach was largely developed in the anglophone countries from the early 1980s – especially in the United Kingdom – centred then around the work ofJeff Hearn,David Morgan and colleagues.[65] The influence of the approach has spread globally since then. It is inspired primarily by a range of feminist perspectives (including socialist and radical) and places emphasis on the need for research and practice to explicitly challenge men's and boys' sexism.[65] Although it explores a very broad range of men's practices, it tends to focus especially on issues related to sexuality and/or men's violences.[66] Although originally largely rooted in sociology, it has since engaged with a broad range of other disciplines including social policy, social work, cultural studies, gender studies, education and law.[67] In more recent years, Critical Studies on Men research has made particular use of comparative and/or transnational perspectives.[68][69][70] Like Men's Studies and Masculinity Studies more generally, Critical Studies on Men has been critiqued for its failure to adequately focus on the issue of men's relations with children as a key site for the development of men's masculinity formations – men's relations with women and men's relations with other men being the two sites which are heavily researched by comparison.[71]
Certain issues associated with gender inEastern Asia and thePacific Region are more complex and depend on location and context. For example, inChina,Vietnam,Thailand,Philippines andIndonesia, a heavy importance of what defines a woman comes from the workforce. In these countries, "gender related challenges tend to be related to economic empowerment, employment, and workplace issues, for example related to informal sector workers, feminization of migration flows, work place conditions, and long term social security".[72] However, in countries who are less economically stable, such asPapua New Guinea,Timor-Leste,Laos,Cambodia, and some provinces in more remote locations, "women tend to bear the cost of social and domestic conflicts and natural disasters".[72]
Places such as India and Polynesia have widely identified third-gender categories. For example, thehijra/kinnar/kinner people of India are often regarded as being a third-gender. Hijra is often considered an offensive term, so the terms kinnar & kinner are often used for these individuals. In places such as India and Pakistan, these individuals face higher rates of HIV infection, depression, and homelessness.[73] Polynesian languages are also consistent with the idea of a third-gender or non-binary gender. The Samoan termfa'afafine, meaning "in the manner of a woman", is used to refer to a third-gender/non-binary role in society. These sexualities are expressed across a spectrum, although some literature has suggested thatfa'afafine individuals do not form sexual relations with one another.[74]
One issue that remains consistent throughout all provinces in different stages of development is women having a weak voice when it comes to decision-making. One of the reasons for this is the "growing trend to decentralization [which] has moved decision-making down to levels at which women's voice is often weakest and where even the women's civil society movement, which has been a powerful advocate at national level, struggles to organize and be heard".[72]
East Asia Pacific's approach to help mainstream these issues of gender relies on a three-pillar method.[75] Pillar one is partnering with middle-income countries and emerging middle-income countries to sustain and share gains in growth and prosperity. Pillar two supports the developmental underpinnings for peace, renewed growth and poverty reduction in the poorest and most fragile areas. The final pillar provides a stage for knowledge management, exchange and dissemination on gender responsive development within the region to begin. These programs have already been established, and successful in,Vietnam,Thailand,China, as well as thePhilippines, and efforts are starting to be made inLaos,Papua New Guinea, andTimor-Leste as well. These pillars speak to the importance of showcasing gender studies.[72]
Philosopher and gender studies Judith Butler's workGender Trouble discussed gender performativity. In Butler's terms the performance of gender, sex, and sexuality is about power in society.[11][76] They locate theconstruction of the "gendered, sexed, desiring subject" in "regulative discourses". A part of Butler's argument concerns the role of sex in the construction of "natural" or coherent gender and sexuality.[77] In their account, gender and heterosexuality are constructed as natural because the opposition of the male and female sexes is perceived as natural in the social imaginary.[11] "Men's and Women's Beliefs About Gender and Sexuality" is an article written by authors Emily Kane andMimi Schippers [d], which explicitly focuses on the social construct of social opposition between men and women. Parallel to Butler's argument, this article also argues that gender is constructed as "natural" within our society when in reality it contains arbitrary aspects. By pointing out distinct differences between gender aspects of both men and women, this article reveals the source of opposition that Butler mentions, arguing that "men and women share a variety of interests based on personal circumstances and on social locations other than gender, but men's and women's gender interests do tend to differ."[78]
Historian and theorist Bryan Palmer argues that gender studies' current reliance onpost-structuralism – with its reification of discourse and avoidance of the structures of oppression and struggles of resistance – obscures the origins, meanings, and consequences of historical events and processes, and he seeks to counter current trends in gender studies with an argument for the necessity to analyze lived experiences and the structures of subordination and power.[79] PsychologistDebra W. Soh postulates that gender studies is composed of dubious scholarship, that it is an unscientific ideology, and that it causes needless disruption in the lives of children.[80][undue weight? –discuss]
Feminist philosopherRosi Braidotti has criticized gender studies as "the take-over of the feminist agenda by studies on masculinity, which results in transferring funding from feminist faculty positions to other kinds of positions. There have been cases... of positions advertised as 'gender studies' being given away to the 'bright boys'. Some of the competitive take-over has to do with gay studies. Of special significance in this discussion is the role of the mainstream publisher Routledge who, in our opinion, is responsible for promoting gender as a way of deradicalizing the feminist agenda, re-marketing masculinity and gay male identity instead."[81] Calvin Thomas countered that, "as Joseph Allen Boone points out, 'many of the men in the academy who are feminism's most supportive 'allies'are gay,'" and that it is "disingenuous" to ignore the ways in which mainstream publishers such as Routledge have promoted feminist theorists.[82]
Gender studies, and more particularly queer studies within gender studies, has been criticized byCatholic Church bishops and cardinals as an attack on human biology.[83][84][unreliable source?]Pope Francis has said that teaching about gender identity in schools is "ideological colonization" that threatens traditional families and fertile heterosexuality.[85] France was one of the first countries where this claim[clarification needed] became widespread when Catholic movements marched in the streets of Paris againstthe bill on gay marriage and adoption.[86] Scholar of law and genderBruno Perreau argues that this fear has deep historical roots, and that the rejection of gender studies and queer theory expresses anxieties about national identity and minority politics.[87] Jayson Harsin argues that the Frenchanti–'gender theory' movement demonstrates qualities of global right-wing populistpost-truth politics.[88]
Teaching certain aspects of gender studies was banned in public schools inNew South Wales after an independent review into how the state teaches sex and health education and the controversial material included in the teaching materials.[89]
In Russia, gender studies is currently tolerated; however, state-supported practices follow the traditional gender perspectives of those in power. The law related to prosecuting and sentencing domestic violence, for instance, was greatly limited in 2017.[92] Since 2010, the Russian government has also been leading a campaign at theUNHRC to recognise Russian "traditional values" as a legitimate consideration in human rights protection and promotion.[93]
Gender studies programs were banned in Hungary in October 2018. In a statement released by Hungarian Prime MinisterViktor Orbán's office, a spokesperson stated that "The government's standpoint is that people are born either male or female, and we do not consider it acceptable for us to talk about socially constructed genders rather than biological sexes." The ban has attracted criticism from several European universities which offer the program, among them the Budapest-basedCentral European University, whose charter was revoked by the government, and is widely seen as part of theHungarian ruling party's move away from democratic principles.[94]
TheCentral People's Government supports studies of gender and social development of gender in history and practices that lead to gender equality. CitingMao Zedong's philosophy, "Women hold up half the sky", this may be seen as continuation of equality of men and women introduced as part ofCultural Revolution.[95]
TheRomanian Senate approved by broad majority in June 2020 an update of National Education Law that would ban theories and opinions on gender identity according to which gender is a separate concept from biological sex.[96][97] In December 2020, theConstitutional Court of Romania overturned the ban; earlier, PresidentKlaus Iohannis had challenged the bill.[98]
^Anne-Marie Smith,Julia Kristeva: Speaking the Unspeakable (Pluto Press, 1988).
^Griselda Pollock, "Inscriptions in the Feminine" and "Introduction" to "The With-In-Visible Screen", in:Inside the Visible edited byCatherine de Zegher. MIT Press, 1996.
^Pollock, Griselda (2013).Art in the Time-Space of Memory and Migration: Sigmund Freud, Anna Freud and Bracha L. Ettinger in the Freud Museum. Leeds, London: Wild Pansy Press & Freud Museum.
^Gutierrez-Albilla, Julian (2017).Aesthetics, Ethics and Trauma in the Cinema of Pedro Almodovar. Edinburgh UP.
^Škof, Lenart (2021).Antigone's Sisters: On the Matrix of Love. SUNY Press.
^de Zegher, Catherine, ed. (1996).Inside the Visible. MIT Press.
^Pollock, Griselda, ed. (2006).Psychoanalysis and the Image. Oxford: Blackwell.
^Horney, Karen (1973), "On the Genesis of the Castration Complex in Women (1922)", in Miller, J. B. (ed.),Psychoanalysis and Women, New York: Bruner/Mazel.
^Ettinger, Bracha L. (2007). "Diotima and the Matrixial Transference: Psychoanalytical Encounter-Event as Pregnancy in Beauty". In Van der Merwe, Chris N.; Viljoen, Hein (eds.).Across the Threshold. NY: Peter Lang.
^Bracha L. Ettinger,The Matrixial Borderspace. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006 (articles 1994–99).ISBN0-8166-3587-0.
^E. Anthony Rotundo (13 May 1994).American Manhood: Transformations in Masculinity From The Revolution to the Modern Era. Basic Books.ISBN9780465001699.
^Evans, Richard J. (2004).The coming of the Third Reich. New York: The Penguin Press.ISBN978-1-59420-004-5.
^Partington, Gillian; Smyth, Adam, eds. (2014).Book Destruction from the Medieval to the Contemporary. New Directions in Book History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.ISBN978-1-137-36766-2.
^Chafetz, Janet Saltzman, ed. (1999).Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
^abDouglas, Fedwa.Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender. Detroit: Macmillan Reference, 2007. Print.
^Liddington, Jill."HISTORY, FEMINISM AND GENDER STUDIES". University of Leeds Centre for Interdisciplinary Gender Studies: Working Paper 1 Feminist Scholarship: within/across/between/beyond the disciplines.
^Jaschik, Scott (10 November 2005)."Indiana Creates First Gender Studies PhD".The last decade has seen the number of women's studies PhD programs grow to at least 10 – most of them relatively new. Last week, Indiana University's board approved the creation of a program that will be both similar and different from those 10: the first doctoral program in the United States exclusively in gender studies.
^abHearn, Jeff; Morgan, David (1990).Men, masculinities & social theory. London: Unwin Hyman.ISBN978-0-04-445657-5.
^Hearn, Jeff (1998).The Violences of Men: : How Men Talk About and How Agencies Respond to Men's Violence to Women. London: Sage.
^Flood, M; Gardiner, J. K.; Pease, B.; Pringle, K., eds. (2007).The International Encyclopedia of Men and Masculinities. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.
^Hearn, Jeff (2015).Men of the World. London: Sage.
^Hearn, Jeff; Pringle, Keith (2006).European Perspectives on Men and Masculinities: National and Transnational Approaches. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.ISBN978-0-230-62644-7.
^Ruspini, Elisabetta; Hearn, Jeff; Pease, Bob; Pringle, Keith, eds. (2011).Men and Masculinities around the World: Transforming Men's Practices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
^Pringle, Keith (2017)."Doing (oppressive) gender via men's relations with children", in Anneli Häyrén and Helena. Wahlström Henriksson (eds), Critical Perspectives on Masculinities and Relationalities: In Relation to What?. New York: Springer.
^Talwar, Rajesh (1999).The Third Sex and Human Rights. Library of Congress - New Delhi Field Office.ISBN8121206421.
^Bartlett, N. H.; Vasey, P. L. (2006). "A retrospective study of childhood gender-atypical behavior in Samoan fa'afafine".Archives of Sexual Behavior.35 (6):659–666.doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9055-1.PMID16909317.S2CID22812712.
^Thomas, Calvin, ed., "Introduction: Identification, Appropriation, Proliferation",Straight with a Twist: Queer Theory and the Subject of Heterosexuality. University of Illinois Press, 2000.
^Hatchett, Bentley (3 January 2017)."12 Cardinals and Bishops Condemn Gender Theory Madness".TFP Student Action. Retrieved19 May 2021.In clear terms these prelates call gender theory what it really is; destructive, anti-reason, neo-Marxist, tyrannical, a form of spiritual terrorism and demonic.
^"Understanding Gender Ideology".Human Life International. 29 October 2018. Retrieved19 May 2021.This article is directed only towards examining the origins of an ideology that seeks to legitimize the application of potentially harmful behavior or mentality to children, marriage, family and society as a whole.
^Harsin, Jayson (2018), "Tactical Connecting and (Im-)Mobilizing in the French Boycott School Day Campaign and Anti-Gender Theory Movement",Global Cultures of Contestation, Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 193–214,doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63982-6_10,ISBN9783319639819
^Harsin, Jayson (1 March 2018). "Post-Truth Populism: The French Anti-Gender Theory Movement and Cross-Cultural Similarities".Communication, Culture and Critique.11 (1):35–52.doi:10.1093/ccc/tcx017.ISSN1753-9129.
Ettinger, Bracha L. (30 September 2001). "The Red Cow Effect". In Howe, Mica; Aguiar, Sarah A. (eds.).He Said, She Says: An RSVP to the Male Text. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 57–88.ISBN978-0-8386-3915-3.OCLC46472137.
Ettinger, Bracha L., 2006. "From Proto-ethical Compassion to Responsibility: Besidedness, and the three Primal Mother-Phantasies of Not-enoughness, Devouring and Abandonment".Athena: Philosophical Studies. Vol. 2.ISSN1822-5047.
Frug, Mary Joe. "A Postmodern Feminist Legal Manifesto (An Unfinished Draft)", in "Harvard Law Review", Vol. 105, No. 5, March, 1992, pp. 1045–1075.ISSN0017-811X
Palmer, Bryan D. (25 January 1990).Descent into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History (Critical Perspectives on the Past Series) (Reprint ed.). Philadelphia:Temple University Press.ISBN978-0-87722-720-5.OCLC233030494.
.svg)
