| Nomad | |
|---|---|
.jpg) The GAF Nomad in the N24 stretched variant | |
| General information | |
| Type | Lightutility aircraft |
| Manufacturer | Government Aircraft Factories |
| Status | In limited service |
| Primary users | Philippine Air Force |
| Number built | 172 |
| History | |
| Manufactured | 1975–1985 |
| First flight | 23 July 1971 |
| Retired | Royal Australian Air Force (1993)[1] |
| Developed into | GippsAero GA18 (planned) |
TheGAF Nomad is autility aircraft produced by theGovernment Aircraft Factories (GAF) ofAustralia inMelbourne.The twin-turboprop, high-wing aircraft has aretractable gear and came in two variants: the initialN22, followed by the stretchedN24.Supported by the Australian Government, design work began in the mid-1960s, and it made itsmaiden flight on 23 July 1971.Despite some export sales and commercial operations, sales were not sufficient and production stopped in 1985.
TheRoyal Flying Doctor Service of Australia, theAustralian Army and theAustralian Customs Service were major users.The Australian military withdrew almost all of its remaining Nomads during the 1990s amid reports of safety concerns.By the end of the 1990s only a small number of aircraft remained in regular use in Australia.
GippsAero acquired the Australiantype certificate for the Nomad in 2008 and announced plans to produce it again as theGA18. The project proceeded slowly and was ultimately stopped, with complete aircraft manufacturing at the facility ending in late 2020.[2] In June 2025, aircraft production recommenced with theGA8 Airvan,[3] and factory support for the Nomad continues.[4]
During 1965, development of what would become the Nomad commenced at GAF, although a considerable number of projects and design studies, including a compact twin-engined utility aircraft proposed by theCommonwealth Aircraft Corporation (CAC) in the 1950s, had been conducted beforehand.[5] In 1966, GAF contacted theAustralian Army, seeking feedback on their proposal, which was of a single-enginedturboprop-powered aircraft that could replace existing assets such as the AmericanCessna 180 and the SwissPilatus PC-6 Porter. The Army informed the company that, based on its combat experiences inVietnam, the service believed a twin-engine configuration would be more useful to them. In the civil sector, an envisionedcrop-dusting variant, viewed by GAF as a counterpart to the successfulde Havilland Canada DHC-2 Beaver, was pitched to potential agricultural operators; they largely favoured using two engines, and noted that it ought to possess greater endurance and "hot-and-high" performance.[5]
Based on feedback, GAF completely redesigned their proposal.[5] This redesign was initially referred to asProject N; its basic configuration was of a twin-engined, multi-purpose transport aircraft. An original intention was that the entire rearfuselage would behinged so that it could be swung open, providing generous rear-loading access to accommodate its target payload of a compact road vehicle; this choice necessitated the adoption of a raised cruciform tail. The new design was viewed as being a direct rival of existing products on the market from manufactures such asBritten-Norman,Shorts andde Havilland Canada.[5] It was intended to be suitable for use by both local and overseas customers in both civil and military markets. According to aerospace periodicalFlight International, it was apparent even at an early stage of the project that the programme could not be realistically accomplished without financial assistance from the Australian government, partly because the nation lacked a large domestic market.[5]
During January 1970, the Australian government decided to provide $A3.2 million to GAF for the production of a pair of flight-capable prototypes along with a single static airframe for testing.[5] The government was keen both to foster the growth of the nation's indigenous aviation industry and specifically to GAF to establish itself with a new aircraft in order to maintain aircraft production at the company, which was then set to end after the scheduled termination oflicense-producedMirage III fighters.[6] Furthermore, the twin-engined aircraft was viewed as a somewhat of a natural successor to the earlierDHA-3 Drover, atrimotor passenger airliner which had been built byde Havilland Australia.[5]
On 23 July 1971, the first prototype (registeredVH-SUP) flew for the first time. By this point, the aircraft had been designated as theN2, and was being aimed at both the military and civilian markets. The designationN22 was to be used initially for military-orientated Nomads; this model, which was subsequently re-designated asN22B during production, was designed to perform military support operations, includingaerial surveillance,medical evacuation, and other ancillary mission types. Furthermore, theN24A designation was assigned to a lengthened version of the Nomad; this was marketed as the principal commercial version.[7][5]
On 5 December 1971, the second prototype performed its first flight. Reportedly, flight testing went relatively smoothly. A minor issue affecting the retraction of theundercarriage was quickly rectified, while directional stability was augmented by a 30 per cent increase in the area of both thefin andrudder.[5] However, the programme was affected by a political dispute between the Army and theRoyal Australian Air Force (RAAF) over whether the Army should continue to operate fixed-wing aircraft; this argument motivated the Australian Government to delay authorising production, causing several key figures of GAF's design team toresign in protest. During May 1972, production of the Nomad was finally authorised at a cost of $A13 million (£6.4 million); by this point, the Army had emerged from the row with success, being allocated 11 aircraft out of the first batch of 20 Nomads. At the same time, the conversion of one of the prototypes to represent a new stretched variant was also authorised.[5]
In service, the Nomad was soon considered to be a problematic aircraft; early evaluations of the type performed by the military were frequently critical of it. Reportedly, safety concerns raised includedfatigue issues with the tailplane, incorrect strength calculations having been used, and multiple questions surrounding the aircraft's overall aerodynamic stability and airworthiness.[1] During August 1976, a high-profile failure occurred when a stretched-fuselage N24 variant crashed during a test flight with modifications to the tail plane,[8] resulting in the deaths of both GAF's chief test pilot Stuart Pearce (father of actorGuy Pearce),[9] and David Hooper, the chief structures designer. As of May 2007, the Nomad has been reportedly involved in a total of 32total hull-loss accidents, which have cumulatively resulted in 76 fatalities.[10]
During late 1980, by which point roughly 130 Nomads have been sold in both civil and military versions, the Australian Government gave its approval for GAF to proceed with the production of a further batch of 55 Nomads; this brought the authorised total production to 200 units, which was the forecastbreak-even point of the programme.[7] In 1981, its unit cost was A$991,000.[7]
_GAF_N22C_Nomad_taxiing_at_Wagga_Wagga_Airport_(1).jpg)
During 1985, production of the Nomad was terminated; in total, only 172 aircraft (including the two prototypes) were manufactured, largely due to the limited number of foreign sales that had been secured by GAF. In 1986, GAF was incorporated into Aerospace Technologies of Australia, which has since been rebranded asBoeing Australia.[11]
In June 2008,Gippsland Aeronautics (nowMahindra Aerospace) announced it had won bidding to take over the Nomad'stype certificate; the company also stated that it would probably be restarting production of new aircraft at some point.[12] Prior to this acquisition, some of the GippsAero design and testing engineers, including the company's co-founder George Morgan, had worked for GAF during the Nomad's development.[13] Reportedly, the N24-basedGA18 was to be re-engineered with new powerplants and propellers, aglass cockpit, and would incorporate various weight-saving measures.[14] It was planned to bring it into service after the development and certification of the new ten-seatGA10, which was due to be completed in March 2013. By 2021, GippsAero had ceased all production and development and plans for the GA18 had been abandoned.[15][16]
As of December 2009[update], only one Nomad was still flying in Australia, although another four were operating in neighbouring New Zealand.[17][18][19]
The GAF Nomad is a twin-engine utility/commuter aircraft capable ofShort Takeoff/Landing (STOL) operations.[7] It was produced in two primary variants, the N22B and N24A, the latter being 5 ft 10 in (177 cm) longer than the N22B; the N24A also differed by its larger nose compartment and separated access provided for the main baggage compartment, which was located aft of the cabin. Key features of the Nomad's general configuration included its rugged and straightforward design, STOL performance, its compact and economic engines and its relatively unobstructed and flat cabin floor.[7] It had been designed to meet or exceed established military requirements of the era, as well as in compliance with regulations set out in theFederal Aviation Administration's (FAA)FAR Part 23.[5]
The Nomad was powered by a pair ofAllison 250B17B/Cturboprop engines, capable of generating up to 400 hp (300 kW) each.[5] Journalist Hugh Field observed the selection of this powerplant to be atypical, while its basic model had a strong reputation from its widespread use onhelicopters, the Nomad was the first application of this engine model. GAF's design team, although reportedly having been initially hesitant about applying a new engine to a new airframe, praised the engine's behaviour upon the prototypes.[20] In-flight, core engine operations could be controlled via a single lever, although additional controls are used for atypical actions such asfeathering. For ease of maintenance, the nacelles were built for easy access, while the engines consist of sub-assemblies that can be individually overhauled or replaced without extracting the entire engine.[20]
The cabin of the Nomad has a continuous rectangular cross-section and a large freight door, both features favourable towards utility/freight operators.[5] It has a full-width flat floor, complete with tie-down rails, which has been stressed to bear at least 150 lb/sq ft (730 kg/m2). While most commonly used as a baggage hold, the nose compartment could also be configured into a bay for housing various equipment packages, includingradar systems,cameras, orlaser scanning/ranging equipment.[5] Externally, the flat underside of the fuselage could be furnished with a pair ofhard points, suitable for the installation ofmini-guns and other munitions; an additional four hard points can be fitted under the wings. To achieve an unobstructed fuselage, the twospars of the strut-braced wing are not continuous, terminating at attachment points on the side of the fuselage.[5]
According to Flight International, the adoption of a retractableundercarriage was a relatively unusual feature for an aircraft of this type; GAF designers selected this arrangement as to avoid excessive aerodynamic drag while enabling the use of large, widely spaced low-pressure tyres, these being key to allowing for rough field operations. Another uncommon feature for an aircraft of its class was the adoption of an all-moving tailplane. GAF suggested that a swing-tail variant could be easily produced due to an intentionally-designed manufacturing joint in the rear-fuselage that could act as a break point.[5] The Nomad was made available in anamphibian variant; it was reportedly one of only a few aircraft in production to feature this facility during the 1980s.[7] The Nomad also possesses a greater maximum cruise speed than most other strut-braced competitors, save for thede Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter.[5]
The Nomad's cockpit, while typically fitted with dual flight controls, is designed to be operated by a single pilot. All of the primary controls are either duplicated or of afail-safe design; both theflaps and undercarriage are electrically actuated; to aid low-speed manoeuvring, an auto-flap button immediately selects 20° flap.[5][20] For militarised models, the cockpit can be outfitted withStanley Aviationzero-zero ejection seats,boron-carbide armour protection around the seats, forward bulkhead and side-panels, as well asbullet-resistant glass installed in the panels of windscreen. The cockpit reportedly possesses above-average external visibility in most directions.[5]
According to aviation publicationFlight International, the principal civil markets for the Nomad were thePacific andNorth American regions.[7] The stretched 16-seat N24A version was the main commercial variant and the most successful model of the Nomad in theUnited States. In the US market, the type was marketed and sold by theHughes Aircraft Company which acted as a distributor; by early 1981, Hughes had taken delivery of 20 Nomads, around half of those in commercial use at that point.[7]
_GAF_Nomad_N22B_at_RAAF_Base_Wagga_(1).jpg)
TheAustralian Army leased the second prototype N22 in 1973. It acquired 11 N22B between 1975 and 1977 for the173rd Aviation Squadron. In 1987 it acquired a 12th N22B from theRoyal Australian Air Force. In 1993 the Army acquired eight more N22B and four N24A to replace itsPilatus PC-6 Porters. These 12 aircraft had been stored unsold when production ceased. All were withdrawn in 1995 following a report issued in May of that year which recommended the type's withdrawal from military duties amid concerns over airworthiness.[1] Most were sold to theIndonesian Navy, but two unflyable airframes were retained as training aids.[citation needed]
TheRoyal Australian Air Force (RAAF) acquired an N22B in 1977. Although owned by the RAAF, it was operated as part of the Army's 173rd Aviation Squadron and was eventually transferred to the Army in 1987. In 1989 the RAAF acquired a formerCoastwatch Nomad Searchmaster and three N24As; one had been a GAF/ASTA test frame and two were from a cancelled order forUnited States Customs Service. According to journalist Ian McPhedran, the Nomad became unpopular with military pilots due to safety concerns that were not addressed by GAF.[1] In 1993 the RAAF decided to withdraw most of its Nomads; several of the retired aircraft were sold to Indonesia. This sale was not without controversy as it allegedly cost more to sell the aircraft than it would have to scrapped them.[1]
TheIndonesian Navy Aviation Service was an early customer for the type and would eventually operate a relatively large fleet. Between 1975 and 1977, it received its first batch of 12 Nomad Searchmaster B and six Searchmaster L aircraft. These 12 surveillance planes were offered by Australia to Indonesia during the early months of the invasion of East Timor, at a moment military operations against the East Timorese resistance were particularly intense and murderous.[21] Subsequently, Indonesia acquired a pair of N24As from the RAAF during 1993, quickly followed by 14 N22B and four N24A from the Australian Army in 1995; these were largely operated foraerial surveillance purposes.[1] The 1990s purchases came at a cost of $2 million to Indonesia, but were supported by around $1 million per year of funding from Australia for the following decade.[1] During 2011, it was announced that just over half of the Indonesian fleet was to be placed into storage and that only a handful of aircraft were to continue regular flight operations after this point.[22]
%2c_USA_PP1260566593.jpg)
 | This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
.jpg)
| Variant | N22B | N24A |
|---|---|---|
| Passengers | 12 | 16 |
| Height | 18 ft 2in / 5.52m | |
| Span | 54 ft 2in / 16.46 m | |
| Wing area | 324 sq.ft / 30.1 m2, 9:1AR,[6] modified NACA 23018 airfoil[52] | |
| Length | 41 ft 3in / 12.57m | 47 ft 1in / 14.34m |
| Cabin length | 17 ft 7in / 5.34m | 21 ft 4in / 6.50m |
| Cab. Height * Width | 5 ft 2in * 4 ft 3in / 1.57m * 1.28m | |
| Cab. volume | 360 cu.ft / 10.2 cu.m | 410 cu.ft / 11.6 cu.m |
| Baggage | 58 cu.ft / 1.64 cu/m | 70 cu.ft / 1.99 cu.m |
| MTOW | 8,500 lb (3,856 kg) | 9,400 lb (4,264 kg) |
| Usable fuel | 268 US gal (1,010 L)[53] | |
| Empty weight[6] | 4,730 lb / 2,150 kg | 5,241 lb / 2,377 kg |
| cruise[6] | 168 knots / 311 km/h | |
| Minimum control speed[53] | 66 kn (122 km/h) | 66.5 kn (123.2 km/h) |
| range[6] | 730nmi / 1352 km, endurance 8 h at 140kt / 259 km/h, FL50 | |
| climb rate | 1,460 ft/min / 7.4 m/s[52] | |
| Ceiling | 25,000 ft (7,600 m)[53] | |
| 2* Turboprop | Allison 250B17B/C | |
| 2* Power | 400–420 hp (300–310 kW)[53] | |
| 2* Propeller | Hartzell 3-blade, 90.63 in (2,302 mm) diam.[53] | |
| Takeoff to 50 ft | 1,050 ft / 320m | |
| Landing from 50 ft | 740 ft / 226m | |
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
In 2011 GippsAero, as it had become known, announced that following an injection of funds by its parent company, Mahindra Aerospace, the development of the GAF N24 Nomad commercial transport would proceed... Following the closure of the GippsAero (Mahindra) facility in late 2020, work on the GA18 had ceased.
One day in August 1976, when he was eight, Pearce came home from school to find all his relatives there. His mum took him to his room and told him his dad had been killed at work
