 | |
 France |  United States |
|---|---|
| Diplomatic mission | |
| Embassy of France, Washington, D.C. | Embassy of the United States, Paris |
| Envoy | |
| French Ambassador to the United StatesLaurent Bili | U.S. Ambassador to FranceCharles Kushner |
TheKingdom of France was the first country to have diplomatic ties with the new United States in 1778. The1778 Treaty of Alliance between the two countries and the subsequent aid provided from France proved decisive in the American victory over Britain in theAmerican Revolutionary War. France, however, was left heavily indebted after the war, which contributed toFrance's own revolution and eventual transition to a republic.
The France–United States relations has remained peaceful since, with the exceptions of theQuasi-War from 1798 to 1800 and American combat againstVichy France (while supportingFree France) from 1942 to 1944 duringWorld War II. In 1803, the United Statespurchased theterritory of Louisiana from France to acquire a total of 828,000 sq mi (2,140,000 km2; 530,000,000 acres) and expand westwards. Tensions, however, rose during theAmerican Civil War, as Franceintervened militarily in Mexico and entertained the possibility of recognizing the separatistConfederate States of America, the defeat of which was followed by the United States sending a large army to the Mexican border and forcing the withdrawal of French forces from Mexico.
Since 2000, the United States and France have continued to work together on a range of issues, such as counterterrorism, climate change, and trade. However, there was sharp disagreement over theIraq War in 2003. Relations improved again starting in 2010.[1]
New France (French:Nouvelle-France) was the area colonized byFrance beginning with exploration in 1534 and ending with cession in 1763.[2][3] The vast territory ofNew France consisted of five colonies at its peak in 1712,[4][5] and it extended from Newfoundland to theCanadian Prairies and from Hudson Bay to theGulf of Mexico, including all theGreat Lakes of North America. Great Britain, having won theFrench and Indian Wars, finally removed the French from continental North America in 1763,[6][7] with almost all of New France ceded to Britain and Spain through theTreaty of Paris.[8] Within a decade, theThirteen Colonies revolted openly. In retaliation, France secretly provided troops and war materials to theAmerican independence movement.[9] After theSecond Continental Congressdeclared independence in July 1776, its representatives in Paris recruited officers for theContinental Army, most notably theMarquis de Lafayette, who served with distinction as amajor general. After the U.S. victory at theBattle of Saratoga in October 1777, the French concluded treaties ofcommerce andalliance on February 6, 1778, committing themselves to fight Britain until the independence of the United States was secured.[10][11]
Six years after the 1783Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War, theFrench Revolution overthrew theBourbon regime. In the beginning, the United States was supportive of the changes in France, where the absolutehereditary monarchy was replaced by aconstitutional republic. However, as the situation in France deteriorated, with the revolutionary government becoming moreauthoritarian and brutal, the United States' sympathy waned. Catherine Hebert reports that French visitors before 1790 made highly favorable reports of American culture, influenced perhaps by the ideals of the noble savage and the American acceptance of the Enlightenment. However the Royalist exiles who came in the 1790s responded in a highly negative fashion to republicanism.[12]
In 1800, Spain returnedits portion of Louisiana to France, which then sold it all to the United States in theLouisiana Purchase of 1803, permanently ending French colonial efforts on the American mainland, following the French defeat inSaint Domingue to theHaitian Revolution that led to create the world's first black-led republic, known asHaiti. In the United States, the legacy of New France includesnumerous place names as well aspockets of French-speaking communities.[13]
During theAmerican Civil War, 1861–65, French leaderNapoleon III favored theConfederate States of America, hoping to weaken the United States, gain a new ally in the Confederacy, safeguard the cotton trade and protect his large investment in controlling theSecond Mexican Empire.[14] Napoleon III took advantage of the war in 1863, when he installed Austrian archdukeMaximilian of Habsburg on the Mexican throne. Washington protested and refused to recognize the new government.[15] Seeking to avoid war with France, Secretary of StateWilliam Seward cautiously limited aid to the Mexican rebels until the Confederacy was near defeat.[16] By 1865, United States diplomatic pressure coupled with the massing of US soldiers on the border with Mexico persuaded Napoleon III to withdraw French troops and support. The democratic Mexican government was soon restored and Maximilian executed.[17]
The removal of Napoleon III in 1870 after theFranco-Prussian War helped improve Franco–American relations. In subsequent years the balance of power in the relationship shifted as the United States, with its very rapid growth in wealth, industry and population, came to overshadow the old powers. Trade was at a low level, France minimized the activity of American banks and insurance companies, tariffs were high, and mutual investments were uncommon.[18] All during this period, the relationship remained friendly—as symbolized by theStatue of Liberty, presented in 1884 as a gift to the United States from the French people. From 1870 until 1918, France was the only major republic in a Europe of monarchies, which endeared it to the United States.[19]
Though initially neutral inWorld War I, Washington provided much-needed money—as loans to be repaid—that purchased American food, oil and chemicals for the French effort throughout the conflict. The first wave of initial American soldiers used French artillery, airplanes and tanks in combat, having brought no heavy equipment (so that the ships could carry more soldiers). In 1918 the United States sent over two million combat troops; they gave the Allies a decisive edge, as the Germans virtually collapsed by September 1918.[20][21]
During the interwar years, the two nations remained friendly. Beginning in the 1920s, U.S. intellectuals, painters, writers, and tourists were drawn to visit because of their interest inFrench culture.[22] However,anti-Americanism came of age in the 1920s, as many French traditionalists were alarmed at the power ofHollywood and warned that America represented amodernity that would overpower French traditions.[23]
In theapproach to the Second World War the United States helped France arm its air force against the Nazi threat. However, fewer than 200 U.S. warplanes could be delivered before France surrendered in 1940.[24] Between 1940 and 1942, the USmaintained diplomatic relations with theVichy France, which were severed after the allied landing in Africa. The US stance towards De Gaulle was hesitant, as the US preferred to support his rivals, admiralFrancois Darlan and generalHenri Giraud, until De Gaulle took over the control over the French Resistance by 1944.
In 1944, theU.S. Third Army under General Patton pushed the German Army from the country, first sweeping across northern France before going on to liberate Lorraine.
In the postwar years, both cooperation and discord persisted. In 1949 the two again became formal allies through theNorth Atlantic Treaty, which set up theNATO military alliance. Although the United States openly disapproved of French efforts to regain control of colonies inAfrica andSoutheast Asia, it supported the French government in fighting theCommunist uprising in French Indochina.[25] France somewhat reluctantly joined the American leadership in theCold War to contain theSoviet Union, despite a large Communist presence in French politics.[26]U.S. Treasury loans and cash grants were given in 1945–47, and especially theMarshall Plan gave large sums (1948–51). The total of all American grants and credits to France from 1946 to 1953 amounted to $4.9 billion.[27] Some French businesses resisted Americanization, but the most profitable, especially chemicals, oil, electronics, and instrumentation, seized upon the opportunity to attract American investments and build a larger market.[28] For example, the U.S. insisted on opportunities for Hollywood films, and the French film industry responded with new life.[29]
Amajor crisis came in 1956 when France, Britain, and Israel attacked Egypt, which had recently nationalized theSuez Canal. Eisenhower forced them to withdraw. By exposing their diminished international stature, theSuez Crisis had a profound impact on the UK and France: the UK subsequently aligned its Middle East policy to that of the United States,[30] whereas France distanced itself from what it considered to be unreliable allies and sought its own path.[31] The two nations also differed over the waging of theVietnam War, in part because French leaders were convinced that the United States could not win. The French popular view of the United States worsened at the same period, as it came to be seen as an imperialist power.[32][33]
Relations improved somewhat after Charles de Gaulle lost power in 1969. France, more strongly than any other nation, has seen theEuropean Union as a method of counterbalancing American power, and thus works towards such ends as having theEuro challenge the preeminent position of theUnited States dollar in global trade and developing aEuropean defense initiative as an alternative toNATO. Overall, the United States had much closer relations with the other large European powers, Great Britain, Germany and Italy.[34]
France under PresidentFrançois Mitterrand supported the 1991Persian Gulf War in Iraq as a major participant underOperation Daguet. The FrenchAssemblee Nationale even took the "unprecedented decision" to place all French forces in the Gulf under United States command for the duration of the war.[35]
All the left and right wing political elements in France strongly denounced the acts of theAl-Qaeda terrorists in the9/11 attack in 2001. PresidentJacques Chirac —later known for his frosty relationship with PresidentGeorge W. Bush—ordered theFrench secret services to collaborate closely with U.S. intelligence, and createdAlliance Base in Paris, a joint-intelligence service center charged with enacting theBush administration'swar on terror. However, all the political elements rejected the idea of a full-scale war against Islamic radical terrorism. Memories of the Algerian war, and its disastrous impact on French internal affairs, as well as more distant memories of its own failed Indochina/Vietnam war, played a major role. Furthermore, France had a largeIslamic population of its own, which Chirac could not afford to alienate.[36] As a consequence, France refused to support any American military efforts in the Middle East. Numerous works by French novelists and film makers criticized the American efforts to transform the 9/11 terrorist attacks into a justification for war.[37]
In March 2003 France, along withGermany,China, andRussia, opposed the proposed UN resolution that would have authorized a U.S.invasion of Iraq.[38] During the run-up to the war, French foreign ministerDominique de Villepin emerged as a prominent critic of the American Iraq policies. Despite the recurring rifts, the often ambivalent relationship remained formally intact. The United States did not need French help, and instead worked closely with Britain and its other allies.[39]
Angry American talk aboutboycotting French products in retaliation fizzled out, having little impact beyond the short-lived renaming of French fries as "Freedom fries."[40][41] Nonetheless, the Iraq war, the attempted boycott, andanti-French sentiments caused a hostile negative counter reaction in Europe.[42] By 2006, only one American in six considered France an ally of the United States.[43]
The ire of American popular opinion toward France during the run-up to the 2003 Iraq Invasion was primarily due to the fact that France threatened to use itsUnited Nations Security Council veto power to blockU.N. resolutions favorable to authorizing military action,[44][45][46] and decided not to intervene in Iraq itself (because the French did not believe the reasons given to go to war, such as thesupposed link between Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda, and the purportedweapons of mass destruction to be legitimate). This contributed to the perception of the French as uncooperative and unsympathetic in American popular opinion at the time. This perception was quite strong and persisted despite the fact that France was and had been for some time a major ally in thecampaign in Afghanistan (see for example theFrench forces in Afghanistan) where both nations (among others in the US-led coalition) were dedicated to the removal of the rogue Taliban, and the subsequent stabilization of Afghanistan, a recognized training ground and safe haven for terrorists intent on carrying out attacks in the Western world.
As theIraq War progressed, andopposition to the Iraq War amongst Americans increased, relations between the two nations began to improve, and Americans' views of France in general also steadily improved over time. In June 2006 thePew Global Attitudes Project revealed that 52% of Americans had a positive view of France, up from 46% in 2005.[47] Other reports indicate Americans are moving not so much toward favorable views of France as toward ambivalence,[48] and that views toward France have stabilized roughly on par with views toward Russia and China.[49]
Following issues likeHezbollah's rise inLebanon,Iran's nuclear program and the stalledIsraeli-Palestinian peace process, George Bush urged Jacques Chirac and other world leaders to "stand up for peace" in the face of extremism during a meeting in New York on September 19, 2006.
French and American diplomatic cooperation at theUnited Nations played an important role in theCedar Revolution, which saw the withdrawal ofSyrian troops from Lebanon. France and the United States also worked together (with some tensions) in crafting UN resolution 1701, intended to bring about a ceasefire in the2006 Israeli–Lebanese conflict.
Political relations between France and the United States became friendlier afterNicolas Sarkozy was elected President of France in 2007.[50][51][52][53] Sarkozy, who has been called "Sarko the American", has said that he "love[s] America" and that he is "proud of his nickname".[54]
In 2007, Sarkozy delivered a speech before Congress that was seen as a strong affirmation of French-American ties; during the visit, he also met with PresidentGeorge W. Bush as well as senatorsJohn McCain andBarack Obama (before they were chosen as presidential candidates).[55] In2008 Bucharest summit,Bush with Canada, Poland, Romania, the Czechs and the Baltic States, strongly supported Ukraine and Georgia becoming NATO action plan members; however, Sarkozy strongly opposed with Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Belgium.[56][57][58]
During the2008 presidential election,Barack Obama andJohn McCain also met with Sarkozy in Paris after securing their respectivenominations.[59] Since 2008, France has returned to the integrated command of NATO,[60] a decision that has been appreciated by the United States.[1]
In 2011 the two countries were part of the multi-state coalition which launched amilitary intervention inLibya where they led the alliance and conducted 35% of all NATO strikes. However, Sarkozy's interests in Libya as being founded on a desire to gain a greater share of oil production, reservation of part of its oil and gas industry for French firms.[61] In his MemoirA Promised Land (2020), Obama wrote that Sarkozy proved to be duplicitous and thoroughly unreliable.[62]
In 2013, France launched a major operation inMali to free the country from anad hoc alliance of terrorists and Azawa rebels. The United States provided France with logistical support forOperation Serval.[63]
After presidentFrançois Hollande pledged support for military action againstSyria, U.S. Secretary of StateJohn Kerry referred to France as "our oldest ally".[64] On 10 February 2014, Hollande arrived in the U.S. for the first state visit by a French leader in nearly two decades.[65]
On September 19, 2014, it was announced that France had joined the United States in bombingIslamic State targets in Iraq as a part of the2014 American intervention in Iraq. United States president, Barack Obama & theChairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,Martin Dempsey, praised Hollande's decision to join the operation: "As one of our oldest and closest allies, France is a strong partner in our efforts against terrorism and we are pleased that French and American service members will once again work together on behalf of our shared security and our shared values." Said Obama.[66]
.jpg)
._(51871965526).jpg)
On 12 July 2017, PresidentDonald Trump visited France as the guest of PresidentEmmanuel Macron. The two leaders discussed issues that includedcounter-terrorism and theSyrian Civil War, but played down topics where they sharply disagreed, especially trade, immigration andclimate change.[67]
In April 2018, after Macron spoke to the United States Congress and mentioned his desire that US rejoin theParis Climate Accords to curb climate change, US congressmanThomas Massiesaid Macron was "a socialist militaristglobalist science-alarmist. The dark future of the American Democratic Party".[68]
In late 2018, Trump ridiculed Macron over nationalism, tariffs, France's World War II defeat, plans for aEuropean army and the French leader's approval ratings. This followed Trump'sArmistice Day visit to Paris which was heavily criticized in both France and the United States.[69] In December, Macron criticised Trump over his decision to withdraw US troops from Syria, stating: "To be allies is to fight shoulder to shoulder. It's the most important thing for a head of state and head of the military," and "An Ally Should Be Dependable."[70][71]
In April 2019, the departing French ambassador to the United StatesGérard Araud commented on the Trump administration and the US:[72] "Basically, this president and this administration don't have allies, don't have friends. It's really [about] bilateral relationships on the basis of the balance of power and the defense of narrow American interest... we don't have interlocutors... [When] we have people to talk to, they are acting, so they don't have real authority or access. Basically, the consequence is that there is only one center of power: the White House."[73] On France working with the US: "...We really don't want to enter into a childish confrontation and are trying to work with our most important ally, the most important country in the world."[74]
In November 2019, Macron questioned the U.S. commitment to Europe, stating: "What we are currently experiencing is the brain death of NATO", adding "[NATO] only works if the guarantor of last resort functions as such. I'd argue that we should reassess the reality of what NATO is in the light of the commitment of the United States".[75]
In March 2019, at a time when China–U.S. economic relations were engaged in atrade war, Macron and Chinese leaderXi Jinping signed a series of 15 large-scale trade and business agreements totaling 40 billion euros (US$45 billion) which covered many sectors over a period of years.[76] The centerpiece was a €30 billion purchase of airplanes fromAirbus. The new trade agreements also covered French chicken exports, a French-built offshore wind farm in China, a Franco-Chinese cooperation fund, billions of Euros of co-financing betweenBNP Paribas and theBank of China, billions of euros to be spent on modernizing Chinese factories, and new ship building.[77]
In July, Trump threatened tariffs against France in retaliation for France enacting adigital services tax against multinational firms. With Trump tweeting, "France just put a digital tax on our great American technology companies. If anybody taxes them, it should be their home Country, the USA. We will announce a substantial reciprocal action on Macron's foolishness shortly. I've always saidAmerican wine is better thanFrench wine!"[78]
French Finance MinisterBruno Le Maire indicated France would follow through with its digital tax plans.[78] French Agriculture MinisterDidier Guillaume responded on French TV, "It's absurd, in terms of having a political and economic debate, to say that if you tax the 'GAFAs', I'll tax wine. It's completely moronic."[79]
After Trump again indicated his intentions to impose taxes on French wine over France's digital tax plans,President of the European CouncilDonald Tusk stated theEuropean Union would support France and impose retaliatory tariffs on the US.[80] In December 2019, the U.S. government stated that it might impose tariffs up to 100% on $2.4 billion in imports from France of Champagne, handbags, cheese and other products, after reaching the conclusion that France's digital services tax would be detrimental to U.S. tech companies.[81]
On 17 September 2021, France recalledPhilippe Étienne, the French ambassador to the U.S., and Jean-Pierre Thébault, the French ambassador to Australia after the formation of theAUKUS defence technology between the U.S., Australia and UK (from which France was excluded). As part of the new security agreement, the U.S. will providenuclear-powered submarines to theRoyal Australian Navy, and Australia canceled a US$66 billion deal from 2016 to purchase twelve French-built conventionally powered (diesel) submarines.[82][83][84] The French government was furious at the cancellation of the submarine agreement and said that it had been blindsided, calling the decision a "stab in the back".[82][83][84] On 22 September, PresidentJoe Biden and Macron pledged to improve the relationship between the two countries.[85] Étienne returned to the United States on 30 September.[86]
However in early 2022, France worked closely with the U.S. and NATO in helping Ukraine and punishing Russia for its invasion. During Macron's visit to the U.S. in December 2022, he and President Biden reaffirmed the cooperation between the two countries. They also discussed the war in Ukraine and economic issues.[87]
In April 2023, Macron argued that European countries should not get involved in US confrontation with China over Taiwan. His long-term plan of "strategic autonomy" angered some Republican lawmakers, who called for a re-evaluation of the US-French relationship.[88][89]
In November 2023, an agreement extended the validity ofE-1 andE-2 visas for French traders and investors in the United States from two to four years.[90]
.jpg)
On June 1, 2025, the American ambassador to IsraelMike Huckabee said that ifFrance wants aPalestinian state, it should "carve" it out of theFrench Riviera.[91]
Richard Kuisel, an American scholar, has explored how France partly embraced American consumerism while rejecting much of American values and power. He writes in 2013:
America functioned as the "other" in configuring French identity. To be French was not to be American. Americans were conformists, materialists, racists, violent, and vulgar. The French were individualists, idealists, tolerant, and civilized. Americans adored wealth; the French worshipedla douceur de vivre. This caricature of America, which was already broadly endorsed at the beginning of the century, served to essentialize French national identity. At the end of the twentieth century, the French strategy [was to use] America as a foil, as a way of defining themselves as well as everything from their social policies to their notion of what constituted culture.[92]
On the other hand, Kuisel identifies several strong pull effects:
American products often carried a representational or symbolic quality. They encoded messages like modernity, youthfulness, rebellion, transgression, status, and freedom ... There was the linkage with political and economic power: historically culture has followed power. Thus Europeans learned English because it is a necessary skill in a globalized environment featuring American technology, education, and business. Similarly the size and power of U.S. multinationals, like that of the global giant Coca-Cola, helped American products win market shares. Finally, it must be acknowledged, that there has been something inherently appealing about what we make and sell. Europeans liked Broadway musicals, TV shows, and fashions. We know how to make and market what others want.[93]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
