Thefoundry model is amicroelectronics engineering and manufacturingbusiness model consisting of asemiconductor fabrication plant, or foundry, and anintegrated circuit design operation, each belonging to separate companies or subsidiaries.[1][2][3][4] It was first conceived byMorris Chang, the founder of theTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC).[5]
Integrated device manufacturers (IDMs) design and manufacture integrated circuits. Many companies, known asfabless semiconductor companies, only design devices; merchant orpure play foundries only manufacture devices for other companies, without designing them. Examples of IDMs areIntel,Samsung, andTexas Instruments,examples of pure play foundries areGlobalFoundries,TSMC, andUMC, and examples of fabless companies areAMD,Nvidia, andQualcomm.[citation needed]
Integrated circuit production facilities are expensive to build and maintain. Unless they can be kept at nearly full use, they will become a drain on thefinances of the company that owns them. The foundrymodel uses two methods to avoid these costs: fabless companies avoid costs by not owning such facilities. Merchant foundries, on the other hand, find work from the worldwide pool of fabless companies, through carefulscheduling,pricing, and contracting, keep their plants in full use.[citation needed]
Companies that both designed and produced the devices were originally responsible for manufacturing microelectronic devices. These manufacturers were involved in both theresearch and development of manufacturing processes and the research and development ofmicrocircuit design.
The first pure play semiconductor company is theTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation founded byMorris Chang, aspin-off of the governmentIndustrial Technology Research Institute, which split its design and fabrication divisions in 1987,[6] a model advocated for byCarver Mead in the U.S., but deemed too costly to pursue. The separation of design and fabrication became known as the foundry model, withfabless manufacturing outsourcing tosemiconductor foundries.[7]
Fabless semiconductor companies do not have any semiconductor fabrication capability, instead contracting with a merchant foundry for fabrication. The fabless company concentrates on the research and development of an IC-product; the foundry concentrates on manufacturing andtesting the physical product. If the foundry does not have any semiconductor design capability, it is a pure-play semiconductor foundry.
An absolute separation into fabless and foundry companies is not necessary. Many companies continue to exist that perform both operations and benefit from the close coupling of their skills. Some companies manufacture some of their own designs and contract out to have others manufactured or designed, in cases where they seevalue or seek special skills. The foundry model is a business model that seeks to optimize productivity.
The very first merchant foundries were part of theMOSIS service. The MOSIS service gave limited production access to designers with limited means, such as students, university researchers, and engineers at smallstartups.[8] The designer submitted designs, and these submissions were manufactured with the commercial company's extra capacity. Manufacturers could insert somewafers for a MOSIS design into a collection of their own wafers when a processing step was compatible with both operations. The commercial company (serving as foundry) was already running the process, so they were effectively being paid by MOSIS for something they were already doing. A factory with excess capacity during slow periods could also run MOSIS designs to avoid having expensivecapital equipment stand idle.
Under-use of an expensive manufacturing plant could lead to the financial ruin of the owner, so selling surpluswafer capacity was a way to maximize the fab's use. Hence, economic factors created a climate where fab operators wanted to sell surplus wafer-manufacturing capacity and designers wanted to purchase manufacturing capacity rather than try to build it.
Although MOSIS opened the doors to some fabless customers, earning additionalrevenue for the foundry and providing inexpensive service to the customer, running a business around MOSIS production was difficult. The merchant foundries sold wafer capacity on a surplus basis, as a secondary business activity. Services to the customers were secondary to the commercial business, with littleguarantee of support. The choice of merchant dictated the design, development flow, and available techniques to the fabless customer. Merchant foundries might requireproprietary and non-portable preparation steps. Foundries concerned with protecting what they consideredtrade secrets of theirmethodologies might only be willing to release data to designers after an onerousnondisclosure procedure.
In 1987, the world's first dedicated merchant foundry opened its doors:Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).[9] The distinction of 'dedicated' is in reference to the typical merchant foundry of the era, whose primary business activity was building and selling of its ownIC-products. The dedicated foundry offers several key advantages to its customers: first, it does not sell finished IC-products into thesupply channel; thus a dedicated foundry will never compete directly with its fabless customers (obviating a common concern of fabless companies). Second, the dedicated foundry can scale production capacity to a customer's needs, offering low-quantityshuttle services in addition to full-scaleproduction lines. Finally, the dedicated foundry offers a "COT-flow" (customer owned tooling) based on industry-standardEDA systems, whereas many IDM merchants required its customers to use proprietary (non-portable) development tools. The COT advantage gave the customer complete control over the design process, from concept to final design.
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (millionUSD) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | Q4 2023 | Q3 2023 | |||
1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 19,660 | 17,249 |
2 | Samsung Semiconductor | IDM | Korea | 3,619 | 3,690 |
3 | GlobalFoundries | Pure-play | United States | 1,854 | 1,852 |
4 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 1,727 | 1,801 |
5 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 1,678 | 1,620 |
6 | Hua Hong Semiconductor | Pure-play | China | 657 | 766 |
7 | Tower Semiconductor | Pure-play | Israel | 352 | 358 |
8 | PowerChip | IDM | Taiwan | 330 | 305 |
9 | Nexchip | Pure-play | China | 308 | 283 |
10 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 304 | 333 |
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (millionUSD) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 2017 | 2016 | |||
1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 32,040 | 29,437 |
2 | GlobalFoundries | Pure-play | United States | 5,407 | 4,999 |
3 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 4,898 | 4,587 |
4 | Samsung Semiconductor | IDM | Korea | 7,398 | 4,284 |
5 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 3,099 | 2,914 |
6 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 1,388 | 1,249 |
7 | PowerChip | IDM | Taiwan | 1,035 | 870 |
8 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 817 | 801 |
9 | Hua Hong Semiconductor | Pure-play | China | 807 | 721 |
10 | Dongbu HiTek | Pure-play | Korea | 676 | 666 |
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (millionUSD) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||
1 | 1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 29,488 | 25,574 | 25,138 |
2 | 2 | GlobalFoundries | Pure-play | United States | 5,545 | 5,019 | 4,355 |
3 | 3 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 4,582 | 4,464 | 4,331 |
4 | 4 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 2,921 | 2,236 | 1,970 |
5 | 5 | PowerChip | Pure-play | Taiwan | 1,275 | 1,268 | 1,291 |
6 | 6 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 1,249 | 961 | 828 |
8 | 8 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 800 | 736 | 790 |
9 | 9 | Hua Hong Semi | Pure-play | China | 712 | 650 | 665 |
10 | 10 | Dongbu HiTek | Pure-play | Korea | 672 | 593 | 541 |
11 | 12 | X-Fab | Pure-play | Germany | 510 | 331 | 330 |
Others | Pure-play | 2,251 | 2,405 | 2,280 |
2013 Rank | 2012 Rank | Company | Foundry Type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million $USD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 19,850 |
2 | 2 | GlobalFoundries | Pure-play | United States | 4,261 |
3 | 3 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 3,959 |
4 | 4 | Samsung Semiconductor | IDM | Korea | 3,950 |
5 | 5 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 1,973 |
7 | 8 | PowerChip | Pure-play | Taiwan | 1,175 |
8 | 9 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 713 |
9 | 6 | Huahong Grace | Pure-play | China | 710 |
10 | 10 | Dongbu | Pure-play | Korea | 570 |
11 | 7 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 509 |
12 | 11 | IBM | IDM | United States | 485 |
13 | 12 | MagnaChip | IDM | Korea | 411 |
14 | 13 | Win Semiconductors | Pure-play | Taiwan | 354 |
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (millionUSD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 14,600 |
2 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 3,760 |
3 | GlobalFoundries | Pure-play | United States | 3,580 |
4 | Samsung Semiconductor | IDM | Korea | 1,975 |
5 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 1,315 |
6 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 610 |
7 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 519 |
8 | Dongbu HiTek | Pure-play | Korea | 500 |
9 | IBM | IDM | United States | 445 |
10 | MagnaChip | IDM | Korea | 350 |
11 | SSMC | Pure-play | Singapore | 345 |
12 | Hua Hong NEC | Pure-play | China | 335 |
13 | Win Semiconductors | Pure-play | Taiwan | 300 |
14 | X-Fab | Pure-play | Germany | 285 |
Rank | Company | Foundry Type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (millionUSD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 13,332 |
2 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 3,824 |
3 | GlobalFoundries | Pure-play | United States | 3,520 |
4 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 1,554 |
5 | Dongbu HiTek | Pure-play | Korea | 512 |
6 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 509 |
7 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 505 |
8 | IBM | IDM | United States | 500 |
9 | MagnaChip | IDM | Korea | 410 |
10 | Samsung Semiconductor | IDM | Korea | 390 |
As of 2009, the top 17 semiconductor foundries were:[18]
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (millionUSD) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||
1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 8,989 | 10,556 | 9,813 |
2 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 2,815 | 3,070 | 3,430 |
3 | Chartered(1) | Pure-play | Singapore | 1,540 | 1,743 | 1,458 |
4 | GlobalFoundries | Pure-play | USA | 1,101 | 0 | 0 |
5 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 1,075 | 1,353 | 1,550 |
6 | Dongbu | Pure-play | South Korea | 395 | 490 | 510 |
7 | Vanguard | Pure-play | Taiwan | 382 | 511 | 486 |
8 | IBM | IDM | USA | 335 | 400 | 570 |
9 | Samsung | IDM | South Korea | 325 | 370 | 355 |
10 | Grace | Pure-play | China | 310 | 335 | 310 |
11 | HeJian | Pure-play | China | 305 | 345 | 330 |
12 | Tower Semiconductor | Pure-play | Israel | 292 | 252 | 231 |
13 | HHNEC | Pure-play | China | 290 | 350 | 335 |
14 | SSMC | Pure-play | Singapore | 280 | 340 | 359 |
15 | Texas Instruments | IDM | USA | 250 | 315 | 450 |
16 | X-Fab | Pure-play | Germany | 223 | 368 | 410 |
17 | MagnaChip | IDM | South Korea | 220 | 290 | 322 |
(1) Now acquired by GlobalFoundries
As of 2008, the top 18 pure-play semiconductor foundries were:[19]
Rank | Company | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (millionUSD) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||
1 | TSMC | Taiwan | 10,556 | 9,813 | 9,748 |
2 | UMC | Taiwan | 3,400 | 3,755 | 3,670 |
3 | Chartered | Singapore | 1,743 | 1,458 | 1,527 |
4 | SMIC | China | 1,354 | 1,550 | 1,465 |
5 | Vanguard | Taiwan | 511 | 486 | 398 |
6 | Dongbu | South Korea | 490 | 510 | 456 |
7 | X-Fab | Germany | 400 | 410 | 290 |
8 | HHNEC | China | 350 | 335 | 315 |
9 | HeJian | China | 345 | 330 | 290 |
10 | SSMC | Singapore | 340 | 350 | 325 |
11 | Grace | China | 335 | 310 | 227 |
12 | Tower Semiconductor | Israel | 252 | 231 | 187 |
13 | Jazz Semiconductor | United States | 190 | 182 | 213 |
14 | Silterra | Malaysia | 175 | 180 | 155 |
15 | ASMC | China | 149 | 155 | 170 |
16 | Polar Semiconductor | Japan | 110 | 105 | 95 |
17 | Mosel-Vitelic | Taiwan | 100 | 105 | 155 |
18 | CR Micro(1) | China | - | 143 | 114 |
Others | 140 | 167 | 180 | ||
Total | 20,980 | 20,575 | 19,940 |
(1) Merged with CR Logic in 2008, reclassified as an IDM foundry
As of 2007, the top 14 semiconductor foundries include:[20]
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (millionUSD) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
1 | TSMC | Pure-Play | Taiwan | 9,813 | 9,748 | 8,217 |
2 | UMC | Pure-Play | Taiwan | 3,755 | 3,670 | 3,259 |
3 | SMIC | Pure-Play | China | 1,550 | 1,465 | 1,171 |
4 | Chartered | Pure-Play | Singapore | 1,458 | 1,527 | 1,132 |
5 | Texas Instruments | IDM | United States | 610 | 585 | 540 |
6 | IBM | IDM | United States | 570 | 600 | 665 |
7 | Dongbu | Pure-Play | South Korea | 510 | 456 | 347 |
8 | Vanguard | Pure-Play | Taiwan | 486 | 398 | 353 |
9 | X-Fab | Pure-Play | Germany | 410 | 290 | 202 |
10 | Samsung | IDM | South Korea | 385 | 75 | - |
11 | SSMC | Pure-Play | Singapore | 350 | 325 | 280 |
12 | HHNEC | Pure-Play | China | 335 | 315 | 313 |
13 | HeJian | Pure-Play | China | 330 | 290 | 250 |
14 | MagnaChip | IDM | South Korea | 322 | 342 | 345 |
For ranking in worldwide:[21]
Rank | Company | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million USD) | 2006/2005 changes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
6 | 7 | TSMC | Taiwan | 9,748 | 8,217 | +19% |
21 | 22 | UMC | Taiwan | 3,670 | 3,259 | +13% |
As of 2004, the top 10 pure-play semiconductor foundries were:[citation needed]
Rank 2004 | Company | Country/Territory of origin |
---|---|---|
1 | TSMC | Taiwan |
2 | UMC | Taiwan |
3 | Chartered | Singapore |
4 | SMIC | China |
5 | Dongbu/Anam | South Korea |
6 | SSMC | Singapore |
7 | HHNEC | China |
8 | Jazz Semiconductor | United States |
9 | Silterra | Malaysia |
10 | X-Fab | Germany |
Like all industries, the semiconductor industry faces upcoming challenges and obstacles.
The cost to stay on the leading edge has steadily increased with each generation of chips. The financial strain is being felt by both large merchant foundries and their fabless customers. The cost of a new foundry exceeds $1 billion. These costs must be passed on to customers. Many merchant foundries have entered into joint ventures with their competitors in an effort to split research and design expenditures and fab-maintenance expenses.
Chip design companies sometimes avoid other companies' patents simply by purchasing the products from a licensed foundry with broad cross-license agreements with the patent owner.[22]
Stolen design data is also a concern; data is rarely directly copied, because blatant copies are easily identified by distinctive features in the chip,[23]placed there either for this purpose or as a byproduct of the design process. However, the data including any procedure, process system, method of operation or concept may be sold to a competitor, who may save months or years of tediousreverse engineering.