This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Forward measure" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(September 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Infinance, aT-forward measure is a pricing measure absolutely continuous with respect to arisk-neutral measure, but rather than using the money market asnumeraire, it uses a bond with maturityT. The use of the forward measure was pioneered byFarshid Jamshidian (1987), and later used as a means of calculating the price ofoptions on bonds.[1]
Let[2]
be the bank account or money market account numeraire and
be the discount factor in the market at time 0 for maturityT. If is the risk neutral measure, then the forward measure is defined via theRadon–Nikodym derivative given by
Note that this implies that the forward measure and the risk neutral measure coincide when interest rates are deterministic. Also, this is a particular form of thechange of numeraire formula by changing the numeraire from the money market or bank accountB(t) to aT-maturity bondP(t,T). Indeed, if in general
is the price of a zero coupon bond at timet for maturityT, where is the filtration denoting market information at timet, then we can write
from which it is indeed clear that the forwardT measure is associated to theT-maturity zero coupon bond asnumeraire. For a more detailed discussion see Brigo and Mercurio (2001).
The name "forward measure" comes from the fact that under the forward measure,forward prices aremartingales, a fact first observed by Geman (1989) (who is responsible for formally defining the measure).[3] Compare with futures prices, which are martingales under the risk neutral measure. Note that when interest rates are deterministic, this implies that forward prices and futures prices are the same.
For example, the discounted stock price is a martingale under the risk-neutral measure:
The forward price is given by. Thus, we have
by using the Radon-Nikodym derivative and the equality. The last term is equal to unity by definition of the bond price so that we get