| Food, Inc. | |
|---|---|
 Theatrical release poster | |
| Directed by | Robert Kenner |
| Written by |
|
| Produced by |
|
| Starring | |
| Edited by | Kim Roberts |
| Music by | Mark Adler |
Production companies | |
| Distributed by | Magnolia Pictures |
Release dates |
|
Running time | 94 minutes[2] |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Budget | $1 million[3] |
| Box office | $4.6 million[4] |
Food, Inc. is a 2008 Americandocumentary film directed byRobert Kenner[1] and narrated byMichael Pollan andEric Schlosser.[5][6] It examinescorporate farming in theUnited States, concluding thatagribusiness produces food that is unhealthy in a way that is environmentally harmful and abusive of both animals and employees. The film received positive reviews and was nominated for several awards, including theAcademy Award for Best Documentary Feature and theIndependent Spirit Award for Best Documentary Feature. A sequel,Food, Inc. 2 was released on April 12, 2024.
The film examines the modernfood industry, and raises alarms about both theindustrial production of meat (chicken, beef, and pork) andthe modern methods used to grow grains and vegetables (primarily corn and soybeans). It discusses the dominance of the American food market by a handful of huge corporations, which work to keep consumers from being aware of how their food is produced and are largely successful in their efforts to avoid such things as strongerfood safety laws, the unionization of their workers, and additionalfood labeling regulations. These companies promote unhealthy food consumption habits among the American public and then supply cheap, inadequately safety-tested, increasinglytransgenic food that is produced and transported using methods that exploit livestock, employees, farmers, and the environment and use large amounts ofpetroleum products.[1][7] Eatingorganic,locally-grown food that isin season and reading product labels are offered as solutions, and the rapid growth of the organic food industry seen as providing hope for the future.
Director Kenner spent three years producing the film.[8][9] He claims he spent a large amount of his budget on legal fees to try to protect himself against lawsuits from industrial food producers, pesticide and fertilizer manufacturers, and other companies of which the film is critical.[8]Eric Schlosser andMichael Pollan, who both appear in the film as interview subjects, are credited as "Co-Producer" and "Special Consultant", respectively.
An extensive marketing campaign was undertaken to promote the film.Stonyfield Farm, anorganicyogurt maker located inNew Hampshire whose CEO is featured in the film, promoted the film by printing information about it on the foil lids of 10 million cups of yogurt in June 2009.[10][11]
A companionbook of the same name was released in May 2009.[6][12][13]
After premiering at the2008 Toronto International Film Festival, the film was shown as a preview at theTrue/False Film Festival inColumbia, Missouri, in February 2009.[14] It also screened at several film festivals in the spring before opening commercially in the United States on June 12, 2009.[7][15] The film earned $61,400 from three theaters (inNew York City,Los Angeles, andSan Francisco) its opening weekend.[16] On June 19, it expanded to an additional 51 theaters in large cities in the U.S. and Canada,[7][13][15][17][18] and it made an additional $280,000 its second weekend.[17]
The film was initially set to be released in the United Kingdom in the summer of 2009,[19] but its release in the country was postponed until 12 February 2010.[20]
The filmmakers' requests to interview representatives from such food giants asMonsanto Company,Tyson Foods,Smithfield Foods, andPerdue Farms were declined.[15][21][22] Monsanto said it invited the filmmakers to a producers' trade show,[23] but the filmmakers claimed they were denied press credentials at the event and were not permitted to attend. The company established a website to respond to the film's claims about their products and actions.[1][22][24] An alliance of food production companies (led by theAmerican Meat Institute) also created a website (SafeFoodInc.org) to respond to the claims made in the film.[7][13][21][25]Cargill told theMinneapolis Star Tribune that the company welcomed "differing viewpoints on how global agriculture can affordably nourish the world while minimizing environmental impact, ensuring food safety, guaranteeing food accessibility and providing meaningful work in agricultural communities", but criticized the film's "'one-size-fits-all' answers to a task as complex as nourishing 6 billion people who are so disparately situated across the world."[26]
Fast-food chainChipotle offered free screenings of the film in July 2009 at various locations nationwide and stated it did things differently, which it hoped customers would appreciate after seeing the documentary.[27]
The film's director, Robert Kenner, denied attacking the current system of producing food, saying an interview with theSF Weekly that "All we want is transparency and a good conversation about these things", though he went on to say that "the whole system is made possible by government subsidies to a few huge crops like corn. It's a form ofsocialism that's making us sick."[28]
Onreview aggregator websiteRotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 95% based on 114 reviews, with an average score of 7.77/10; the website's critical consensus reads: "An eye-opening expose of the modern food industry,Food, Inc. is both fascinating and terrifying, and essential viewing for any health-conscious citizen."[29] OnMetacritic, the film has aweighted average score of 80 out of 100 based on reviews from 28 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[30]
TheStaten Island Advance called the film "excellent" and "sobering", concluding: "Documentaries work when they illuminate, when they alter how we think, which rendersFood, Inc. a solid success, and a must-see."[31] TheToronto Sun called it "terrifying" and "frankly riveting".[18] TheSan Francisco Examiner was equally positive, calling the film "visually stylish" and "One of the year’s most important films".[32] The paper called the film's approach to its controversial subject matter "a dispassionate appeal to common sense" and applauded its "painstaking research and thoughtful, evenhanded commentary".[32] The Environmental Blog sympathized with the film's message and urged viewers to "vote to change this system".[33]
TheLos Angeles Times praised 'the film's cinematography, and called it "eloquent" and "essential viewing."[34] TheMontreal Gazette noted that, despite the film's focus on American food manufacture, it is worth viewing by anyone living in a country in which large-scale food production occurs.[6] The paper's reviewer declared the film a "must-see", but also cautioned that some of the scenes are "not for the faint of heart".[6]
TheSt. Louis Post-Dispatch noted that earlier documentaries and books had examined similar issues, but still deemed the film to be worth seeing: "The food-conglomerate angle was covered in a less-ambitious documentary calledKing Corn, and a more-ambitious documentary calledThe Corporation touched on the menace of the multinationals; but this one hits the sweet spot, and it does it with style."[35] The review concluded that the most powerful portion of the film focused on Monsanto's pursuit of legal action against farmers accused of saving and reselling or replanting Monsanto’s patented seed in violation of a signed stewardship agreement and contract not to save and resell or replant seeds produced from crops grown from Monsanto seed.[24][35]
Some reviews were less positive. A commentator atForbes magazine found the film compelling, but incomplete, writing that it "fails to address how we might feed the country—or world" using the sustainable agriculture model advocated by the filmmakers, nor does it address the critical issues of cost and access.[23] A reviewer forThe Washington Times said the film was "hamstrung" because few corporate executives wished to be interviewed, although the reviewer agreed that the filmmakers were aiming for balance.[36]
The film was nominated for theAcademy Award for Best Documentary Feature at the82nd Academy Awards,[37] where it lost toThe Cove, and for theIndependent Spirit Award for Best Documentary Feature at the25th Independent Spirit Awards, where it lost toAnvil! The Story of Anvil. It tied for fourth place in the Best Documentary category at the 35thSeattle International Film Festival.[38]
In January 2023, Participant announced a sequel,Food, Inc. 2, to be released in late 2023, though was eventually pushed back to April 12, 2024. The documentary is a continuation of the original story. The film is being directed by Kenner and Melissa Robledo, who are being joined as producers by Schlosser and Pollan, the original film's narrators.[39]
