Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

First Islamic state

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
State established in Medina in 622
First Islamic state
622–632
The state of Medina (green) at the time of Muhammad's death, c. 632. It also shows the routes of early Muslim expeditions and conquests under Muhammad.
CapitalMedina
Common languagesClassical Arabic
Religion
Islam
GovernmentIslamic state
• 622–632
Muhammad
Historical eraLate antiquity
622
622
13 March 624
23 March 625
31 March – 14 April 627
March 628
31 December 629 – 10 January 630
632
CurrencyDenarius
Dirham
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Pre-Islamic Arabia
Sasanian Yemen
Mazun (Sasanian province)
Muhammad in Mecca
Rashidun Caliphate

The firstIslamic state was established by theIslamic prophetMuhammad inMedina in 622 under theConstitution of Medina. It represented the political unity of the MuslimUmmah (nation). After Muhammad's death, his companions known as the Rightly Guided Caliphs (Rashidun) founded theRashidun Caliphate (632–661), which began massive expansion and motivated subsequent Islamic states, such as theUmayyad Caliphate (661–750) andAbbasid Caliphate (750–1258).

Muhammad came to the city of Medina following the migration of his followers in what is known as theHijrah (migration to Medina) in 622. He had been invited to Medina by city leaders to adjudicate disputes between clans from which the city suffered, and was received positively by the city's Jewish and pagan residents as an arbitrator.[1][2] As a result, he was accepted by popular consensus as the city's political leader, establishing the first Islamic state with his role.[3]

The first Islamic state was governed largely by theConstitution of Medina, -with today's nomenclature- which dictated the coalition unification of Medina's tribes and themuhajirun under Muhammad.[4]

Historicity

[edit]
Further information:Historicity of Muhammad andHistoriography of early Islam

Prophetic biography, known assīra, along with attributed records of the words, actions, and the silent approval of Muhammad, known ashadith, survive in the historical works of writers from the second and third centuries of theMuslim era (c. 700−1000 CE)[5][6] and give a great deal of information on Muhammad.

A"Pseudo-Byzantine" coin with depictions of theByzantine emperorConstans II holding the cross-tipped staff andglobus cruciger.

Although the sources concerning theSasanian realm of influence for the 6th century AD, which represents the time period before the beginning of Islam, are poor, the sources for theByzantine provinces of Syria and Iraq in the same period, complemented bySyriac Christian writings, provide a superior quality.[7] At the same time, the study of the earliest periods in Islamic history is made difficult by a lack of sources.[8] Most Islamic history wastransmitted orally until after the rise of theAbbasid Caliphate.[9][full citation needed] The stories on early Islamic history were writtena posteriori in the form of "founding conquest stories" based on nostalgia for the golden age in Abbasid times. Humphrey, quoted by Antoine Borrut, explains that the stories related to this period were created according to a pact-betrayal-redemption principle.[10]

The general Islamic view is that the Quran has been preserved from the beginning by both writing and memorization, and its testimony is considered beyond doubt. The earliest Muslim source of information for the life of Muhammad, theQuran, gives very little personal information and itshistoricity is debated.[11] A group of researchers[who?] explores the irregularities and repetitions in the Quranic text in a way that refutes the traditional claim that it was preserved by memorization alongside writing. According to them, anoral period shaped the Quran as a text and order, and the repetitions and irregularities mentioned were remnants of this period.[12][full citation needed]

A page from theSanaa manuscript, with "subtexts" revealed underUV, very different fromcontemporary editions of the Quran.Puin argues that these variants indicatean evolving text, not a fixed one.[13]

History

[edit]

Background

[edit]
Main article:Hijrah

A delegation from Yathrib, consisting of the representatives of the twelve important clans of Medina, invited Muhammad as a neutral outsider to serve as the chief arbitrator for the community.[1][14] There had been conflict in Yathrib between itsArab andJewish tribes for around a hundred years prior.[1] The recurring disagreements, fighting and killing over competing claims, especially after theBattle of Bu'ath in which all the clans were involved, rendered the tribal conceptions of blood-feud andeye for an eye justice unworkable without a neutral authority to adjudicate in disputed cases.[1] The delegation from Medina pledged themselves and their fellow-citizens to accept Muhammad into their community and to protect him as one of their own.[15]

Muhammad instructed his followers to emigrate to Medina until virtually all of his followers had leftMecca. Being alarmed at the departure of Muslims, according to the tradition, the Meccans plotted to assassinate him. He instructed his cousin and future son-in-lawAli to sleep in his bed to trick the assassins that he had stayed (and to fight them off in his stead) and secretly slipped away from the town.[16] By 622, Muhammad had emigrated to Medina, then known as Yathrib, a large agriculturaloasis.[15] Following the emigration, the Meccans seized the properties of the Muslim emigrants in Mecca.[17]

Among the things Muhammad did in order to settle the longstanding grievances among the tribes of Medina was drafting a document known as theConstitution of Medina (date debated), establishing a kind of brotherhood among the eight Medinan tribes andMuslim emigrants from Mecca, which specified the rights and duties of all citizens and the relationship of the different communities in Medina (including that of the Muslim community to other communities specifically the Jews and other "Peoples of the Book").[1][14] The community defined in the Constitution of Medina,umma, had a religious outlook but was also shaped by the practical considerations and substantially preserved the legal forms of the oldArab tribes.[15]

Relationship with followers of Abrahamic religions

[edit]

The first group ofpagan converts to Islam in Medina were the clans who had not produced great leaders for themselves but had suffered from warlike leaders from other clans. This was followed by the general acceptance of Islam by thepagan population of Medina, apart from some exceptions. This was, according toIbn Ishaq, influenced by the conversion to Islam ofSa'd ibn Mua'dh, one of the prominent leaders in Medina.

In the course of Muhammad proselytizing in Mecca, he viewedChristians and Jews (both of whom he referred to as "People of the Book") as natural allies, part of theAbrahamic religions, sharing the core principles of his teachings, and anticipated their acceptance and support.Muslims, like Jews, were at that time praying towards Jerusalem. In the Constitution of Medina, Muhammad demanded the Jews' political loyalty in return for religious and cultural autonomy in many treaties.[18]

This article is part of
a series about
Muhammad








The Jewish clans however did not obey these treaties because of a feud with the Muslims though in the course of time there were a few converts from them.[19] After his migration to Medina, Muhammad's attitude towards Christians and Jews changed "because of experience of treachery".Norman Stillman states:[20]

During this fateful time, fraught with tension after the Hijra [migration to Medina], when Muhammad encountered contradiction, ridicule and rejection from the Jewish scholars in Medina, he came to adopt a radically more negative view of the people of the Book who had received earlier scriptures. This attitude was already evolving in the third Meccan period as the Prophet became more aware of the antipathy between Jews and Christians and the disagreements and strife amongst members of the same religion. TheQur'an at this time states that it will "relate [correctly] tothe Children of Israel most of that about which they differ"27:76.

Internal disputes

[edit]
Further information:Early Muslim–Meccan conflict
A map of the Badr campaign

Economically uprooted by their Meccan persecutors, the Muslim migrants turned to raiding Meccancaravans to respond to their persecution and to provide sustenance for their Muslim families, thus initiating armed conflict between the Muslims and the paganQuraysh of Mecca.[21][22] Muhammad delivered Qur'anic verses permitting the Muslims, "those who have been expelled from their homes", to fight the Meccans in opposition to persecution (see Qur'anSura 22 (Al-Hajj)Ayat 39-40[23]).[24] These attacks provoked and pressured Mecca by interfering with trade, and allowed the Muslims to acquire wealth, power and prestige while working toward their ultimate goal of inducing Mecca's submission to the new faith.[25][26]

In March 624, Muhammad led some three hundred warriors in a raid on a Meccan merchant caravan. The Muslims set an ambush for the Meccans at Badr.[27] Aware of the plan, the Meccan caravan eluded the Muslims. Meanwhile, a force from Mecca was sent to protect the caravan. The force did not return home upon hearing that the caravan was safe. Thebattle of Badr began in March 624.[28] Though outnumbered more than three to one, the Muslims won the battle, killing at least forty-five Meccans and taking seventy prisoners for ransom; only fourteen Muslims died. They had also succeeded in killing many of the Meccan leaders, includingAbu Jahl.[29] Muhammad himself did not fight, directing the battle from a nearby hut alongsideAbu Bakr.[30] In the weeks following the battle, Meccans visited Medina in order to ransom captives from Badr. Many of these had belonged to wealthy families, and were likely ransomed for a considerable sum. Those captives who were not sufficiently influential or wealthy were usually freed without ransom. Muhammad's decision was that those prisoners who refused to end theirpersecution of Muslims and were wealthy but did not ransom themselves should be killed.[31][32] Muhammad ordered the immediate execution of twoQuraysh men without entertaining offers for their release.[32] Both men, which includedUqba ibn Abu Mu'ayt, had personally attempted to kill Muhammad in Mecca.[31] The raiders had won a lot of treasure, and the battle helped to stabilize the Medinan community.[33] Muhammad and his followers saw in the victory a confirmation of their faith and a prime importance in the affairs of Medina. Those remaining pagans in Medina were very bitter about the advance of Islam. In particularAsma bint Marwan andAbu 'Afak had composed verses insulting some of the Muslims and thereby violated theConstitution of Medina to which they belonged. These two were assassinated and Muhammad did not disapprove of it. No one dared to take vengeance on them, and some of the members of the clan of Asma bint Marwan who had previously converted to Islam in secret, now professed openly. This marked an end to the overt opposition to Muhammad among the pagans in Medina.[34]

Muhammadexpelled from Medina theBanu Qaynuqa, one of the three main Jewish tribes.[15] Jewish opposition "may well have been for political as well as religious reasons".[35] On religious grounds, the Jews were skeptical of the possibility of anon-Jewish prophet,[36] and also had concerns about possible incompatibilities between the Qur'an and their own scriptures.[36][37] The Qur'an's response regarding the possibility of a non-Jew being a prophet was thatAbraham was not a Jew. The Qur'an also stated that it was "restoring the puremonotheism of Abraham which had been corrupted in various, clearly specified, ways by Jews and Christians".[36] According toFrancis Edward Peters, "The Jews also began secretly to connive with Muhammad's enemies in Mecca to overthrow him."[38]

Following the battle of Badr, Muhammad also made mutual-aid alliances with a number ofBedouin tribes to protect his community from attacks from the northern part ofHejaz.[15]

Conflicts with the Quraish

[edit]
See also:Battle of Uhud

The attack at Badr committed Muhammad to total war with Meccans, who were now eager to avenge their defeat. To maintain their economic prosperity, the Meccans needed to restore their prestige, which had been lost at Badr.[39] The Meccans sent out a small party for a raid on Medina to restore confidence and reconnoitre. The party retreated immediately after a surprise and speedy attack but with minor damages; there was no combat.[40] In the ensuing months, Muhammad led expeditions on tribes allied with Mecca and sent out a raid on a Meccan caravan.[41]Abu Sufyan ibn Harb subsequently gathered an army of three thousand men and set out for an attack on Medina.[42] They were accompanied by some prominent women of Mecca, such asHind bint Utbah, Abu Sufyan's wife, who had lost family members at Badr. These women provided encouragement in keeping with Bedouin custom, calling out the names of the dead at Badr.[43]

A scout alerted Muhammad of the Meccan army's presence and numbers a day later. The next morning, at the Muslim conference of war, there was dispute over how best to repel the Meccans. Muhammad and many of the senior figures suggested that it would be safer to fight within Medina and take advantage of its heavily fortified strongholds. Younger Muslims argued that the Meccans were destroying their crops, and that huddling in the strongholds would destroy Muslim prestige. Muhammad eventually conceded to the wishes of the latter, and readied the Muslim force for battle. Thus, Muhammad led his force outside to the mountain of Uhud (where the Meccans had camped) and fought theBattle of Uhud on March 23.[44][45]

Although the Muslim army had the best of the early encounters, indiscipline on the part of tactically placed archers led to a tactical defeat for the Muslim army, with 75 Muslims killed. However, the Meccans failed to achieve their goal of destroying the Muslims completely.[46] The Meccans did not occupy the town and withdrew to Mecca, since they were unable to attack Muhammad's position again, owing to military losses, low morale and the possibility of Muslim resistance in the town. There was also hope thatAbd-Allah ibn Ubayy leading a group of Muslims in Medina could be won over by diplomacy.[47] Following the defeat, Muhammad's detractors in Medina said that if the victory at Badr was proof of the genuineness of his mission, then the defeat at Uhud was proof that his mission was not genuine.[48] Muhammad subsequently delivered Qur'anic verses 133-135 and 160-162 from theAl-i-Imran sura[49] indicating that the loss, however, was partly a punishment for disobedience and partly a test for steadfastness.[50]

The rousing of the nomads

[edit]

In thebattle of Uhud, the Meccans had collected all the available men from theQuraysh and the neighboring tribes friendly to them but had not succeeded in destroying the Muslim community. In order to raise a more powerful army, Abu Sufyan attracted the support of the greatnomadic tribes to the north and east of Medina, using propaganda about Muhammad's weakness, promises of treasure, memories of the prestige of Quraysh and straight bribes.[51]

Muhammad's policy in the next two years after the battle of Uhud was to prevent as best he could the formation of alliances against him. Whenever alliances of tribesmen against Medina were formed, he sent out an expedition to break it up.[51] When Muhammad heard of men massing with hostile intentions against Medina, he reacted with severity.[52] One example is the assassination ofKa'b ibn al-Ashraf, a member of theJewish tribe ofBanu Nadir who had gone to Mecca and written poems that had helped rouse the Meccans' grief, anger and desire for revenge after the battle of Badr (see the main article for other reasons for killing of Ka'b given in the historiographical sources).[53] Around a year later, Muhammadexpelled the Jewish Banu Nadir from Medina.[54]

Muhammad's attempts to prevent formation of confederation against him were not successful, although he was able to augment his own forces and keep many tribes from joining the confederation.[55]

Siege of Medina

[edit]
Main article:Battle of the Trench

Abu Sufyan, the military leader of the Quraysh, with the help of Banu Nadir, had mustered a force numbering 10,000 men. Muhammad was able to prepare a force of about 3,000 men. He had however adopted a new form of defense, unknown in Arabia at that time: Muslims had dug trenches wherever Medina lay open to cavalry attack. The idea is credited to a Persian convert to Islam,Salman. The siege of Medina began on 31 March 627 and lasted for two weeks.[56] Abu Sufyan's troops were unprepared for the fortifications they were confronted with, and after an ineffectual siege, the coalition decided to go home.[57] The Qur'an discusses this battle in verses 9-27 of sura 33,Al-Ahzab.[58][59]

Battle of Khandaq (Battle of the Trench)

During the Battle of the Trench, the Jewish tribe ofBanu Qurayza who were located at the south of Medina were charged with treachery. After the retreat of the coalition, Muslims besieged Banu Qurayza, the remaining major Jewish tribe in Medina. The Banu Qurayza surrendered and all the men, apart from a few who converted to Islam, were beheaded, while all the women and children were enslaved.[60][61] In dealing with Muhammad's treatment of the Jews of Medina, aside from political explanations, Arab historians and biographers have explained it as "the punishment of the Medina Jews, who were invited to convert and refused, perfectly exemplify the Quran's tales of what happened to those who rejected the prophets of old."[62]F.E. Peters, a western scholar of Islam, states that Muhammad's treatment of Jews of Medina was essentially political being prompted by what Muhammad read as treasonous and not some transgression of the law ofGod.[38] Peters adds that Muhammad was possibly emboldened by his military successes and also wanted to push his advantage. Economical motivations according to Peters also existed since the poorness of the Meccan migrants was a source of concern for Muhammad.[63] Peters argues that Muhammad's treatment of the Jews of Medina was "quite extraordinary", "matched by nothing in the Qur'an", and is "quite at odds with Muhammad's treatment of the Jews he encountered outside Medina."[38] According to Welch, Muhammad's treatment of the three major Jewish tribes brought Muhammad closer to his goal of organizing a community strictly on a religious basis. He adds that some Jews from other families were, however, allowed to remain in Medina.[15]

In the siege of Medina, the Meccans had exerted their utmost strength towards the destruction of the Muslim community. Their failure resulted in a significant loss of prestige; their trade withSyria was gone.[64] Following the battle of trench, Muhammad made two expeditions to the north which ended without any fighting.[15] While returning from one of these two expeditions (or some years earlier according to other early accounts), anaccusation of adultery was made againstAisha, Muhammad's wife. Aisha was exonerated from the accusations when Muhammad announced that he had received a revelation, verse 4 in theAn-Nur sura,[65] confirming Aisha's innocence and directing that charges of adultery be supported by four eyewitnesses.[66]

Truce of Hudaybiyya

[edit]
Main article:Treaty of Hudaybiyyah

Although Qur'anic verses had been received from God commanding theHajj,[67] the Muslims had not performed it due to the enmity of the Quraysh. In the month ofShawwal 628, Muhammad ordered his followers to obtain sacrificial animals and to make preparations for a pilgrimage (umrah) to Mecca, saying that God had promised him the fulfillment of this goal in a vision where he was shaving his head after the completion of the Hajj.[68] According to Lewis, Muhammad felt strong enough to attempt an attack on Mecca, but on the way it became clear that the attempt was premature and the expedition was converted into a peaceful pilgrimage.[69] Andrae disagrees, writing that the Muslim state ofihram (which restricted their freedom of action) and the paucity of arms carried indicated that the pilgrimage was always intended to be pacific. Most Islamic scholars agree with Andrae's view.[70] Upon hearing of the approaching 1,400 Muslims, the Quraysh sent out a force of 200 cavalry to halt them. Muhammad evaded them by taking a more difficult route, thereby reaching al-Hudaybiyya, just outside Mecca.[71] According to Watt, although Muhammad's decision to make the pilgrimage was based on his dream, he was at the same time demonstrating to the pagan Meccans that Islam does not threaten the prestige of their sanctuary, and that Islam was an Arabian religion.[72]

Negotiations commenced with emissaries going to and from Mecca. While these continued, rumors spread that one of the Muslim negotiators,Uthman ibn Affan, had been killed by the Quraysh. Muhammad responded by calling upon the pilgrims to make a pledge not to flee (or to stick with Muhammad, whatever decision he made) if the situation descended into war with Mecca. This pledge became known as the "Pledge of Good Pleasure" (Arabic:بيعة الرضوان,bay'at al-ridhwān) or the "Pledge of the Tree." News of Uthman's safety, however, allowed for negotiations to continue, and thetreaty of Hudaybiyyah, scheduled to last ten years was eventually signed between the Muslims and the Quraysh.[69][71] The main points of treaty were the following:

  1. The two parties and their allies should desist from hostilities against each other.[73]
  2. Muhammad, should not perform Hajj this year but in the next year, Mecca will be evacuated for three days for Muslims to perform Hajj.[74]
  3. Muhammad should send back any Meccan who had gone to Medina without the permission of his or her protector (according toWilliam Montgomery Watt, this presumably refers to minors or women).[74]
  4. It was allowed for both Muhammad and the Quraysh to enter into alliance with others.[74]

Many Muslims were not satisfied with the terms of the treaty. However, the Qur'anic suraAl-Fath (The Victory)[75] assured the Muslims that the expedition from which they were now returning must be considered a victorious one.[76] It was only later that Muhammad's followers would realise the benefit behind this treaty. These benefits, according to Welch, included the inducing of the Meccans to recognise Muhammad as an equal; a cessation of military activity posing well for the future; and gaining the admiration of Meccans who were impressed by the incorporation of the pilgrimage rituals.[15]

After signing the truce, Muhammad made an expedition against the Jewish oasis ofKhaybar. The explanation given by western scholars of Islam forthis attack ranges from the presence of the Banu Nadir in Khaybar, who were inciting hostilities along with neighboring Arab tribes against Muhammad, to deflecting from what appeared to some Muslims as the inconclusive result of the truce of Hudaybiyya, increasing Muhammad's prestige among his followers and capturing booty.[42][77] According to Muslim tradition, Muhammad alsosent letters to many rulers of the world, asking them to convert to Islam (the exact date are given variously in the sources).[15][78][79] Hence he sent messengers (with letters) toHeraclius of theByzantine Empire (the eastern Roman Empire),Khosrau ofPersia, the chief ofYemen and to some others.[78][79] Most critical scholars doubt this tradition, however.[80] In the years following the truce of Hudaybiyya, Muhammad sent his forces against the Arabs ofMu'tah on Byzantine soil in Transjordania since according to the tradition, they had murdered Muhammad's envoy. Muslims were defeated in this battle.[81]

Conquest of Mecca and subsequent military expeditions

[edit]
Muhammad and thesahaba advancing on Mecca. TheangelsGabriel,Michael,Israfil andAzrael, are also in the painting.
Main articles:Conquest of Mecca andMuhammad after the occupation of Mecca

In Ramadan 8 AH (around October 629), Muhammad left for Mecca with approximately 10,000 of hissahaba aiming to capture the city from theQuraysh following a violation of the terms of theTreaty of Hudaybiyyah by theBanu Bakr, who were allies of the Quraysh, after they attacked theBanū Khuzaʽah, allies of the Muslims. The Treaty had called for a 10-year truce and ceasefire between the Muslims, the Quraysh and their respective allies. Muhammad arrived at Mecca a week from his departure, dividing the army into four regiments, each entering Mecca from one point of entry. The conquest was largely bloodless and the Quraysh eventually surrendered without putting up a fight.[82][83][84]

Following the Conquest of Mecca, Muhammad was informed of a military threat from the confederate tribes ofHawazin who were readying an army twice as strong as Muhammad and thesahaba. They were joined by theThaqif inhabiting in the city ofTa’if who had adopted an anti-Meccan policy due to the decline of the prestige of Meccans. Both tribes were subsequently defeated in theBattle of Hunayn.[15][85] Muhammad subsequently launched an expedition against theByzantine Empire and theirGhassanid allies in the north in theExpedition of Tabuk. Although Muhammad did not make contact with hostile forces at Tabuk, he received the submission of some of the local chiefs of the region.[15][86] Following this expedition, theBanu Thaqif and other Bedouins submitted to Muhammad in order to be safe from attack and to benefit from the bounty of the wars.[15]

Following the Conquest of Mecca and these events, Muhammad would perform theFarewell Pilgrimage and return toMedina, where he would fall ill for several days with aheadache and weakness. He died on Monday, June 8, 632, in the city, being buried where the home of his wifeAisha had been. It has since been modified several times and is now enclosed under theGreen Dome withinAl-Masjid al-Nabawi in Medina.[15][87]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdeThe Cambridge History of Islam (1977), p. 39
  2. ^Jones, Lindsay; Eliade, Mircea; Adams, Charles J., eds. (2005).Encyclopedia of Religion (2nd ed.). Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.ISBN 978-0-02-865733-2.
  3. ^Islam, History of."Prophet Muhammad in Medina | Advent of Islam".History of Islam. Retrieved2025-01-04.
  4. ^Khel, Muhammad Nazeer Kaka (1982)."Foundation of the Islamic State at Medina and Its Constitution".Islamic Studies.21 (3):61–88.ISSN 0578-8072.JSTOR 20847209.
  5. ^Donner 1998, p. 125.
  6. ^William Montgomery Watt,Muhammad in Mecca, 1953, Oxford University Press, p.xi
  7. ^Robinson 2010, pp. 4–5. sfn error: no target: CITEREFRobinson2010 (help)
  8. ^Donner 2010, p. 628. sfn error: no target: CITEREFDonner2010 (help)
  9. ^Vansina (1985) harvtxt error: no target: CITEREFVansina1985 (help)
  10. ^Borrut A., "From Arabia to the Empire - conquest and caliphal construction in early Islam", in The Historians' Quran , vol. 1 , 2019, pp. 249-289
  11. ^Nigosian 2004, p. 6.
  12. ^Bannister, "Retelling the Tale", 2014: p.1-4
  13. ^Lester, Toby (1 January 1999)."What Is the Koran?".The Atlantic. Washington, D.C.ISSN 2151-9463.OCLC 936540106.Archived from the original on 25 August 2012. Retrieved16 May 2022.
  14. ^abEsposito (1998), p. 17.
  15. ^abcdefghijklmAlford Welch,Muhammad, Encyclopedia of Islam
  16. ^Moojan Momen, An Introduction to Shi'i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shiʻism, Yale University Press, p. 5
  17. ^Fazlur Rahman (1979), p. 21
  18. ^See:
    • Esposito (1998), p.17
    • Neusner (2003), p.153
  19. ^Watt (1956), p. 175, p. 177.
  20. ^Norman Stillman,Yahud,Encyclopedia of Islam
  21. ^Lewis, "The Arabs in History," 2003, p. 44.
  22. ^Montgomery Watt,Muhammad, Prophet and Statesman, Oxford University Press, 1961, p. 105.
  23. ^Quran22:39-40
  24. ^John Kelsay, Islam and War: A Study in Comparative Ethics, p. 21
  25. ^Watt,Muhammad, Prophet and Statesman, Oxford University Press, 1961, p. 105, 107
  26. ^Bernard Lewis (1993), p. 41.
  27. ^Rodinson (2002), p. 164.
  28. ^The Cambridge History of Islam, p. 45
  29. ^Glubb (2002), pp. 179–186.
  30. ^Watt (1961), pp. 122–3.
  31. ^abWatt (1961), p. 123.
  32. ^abRodinson(2002), pp. 168–9.
  33. ^Lewis, "The Arabs in History," p. 44.
  34. ^Watt (1956), p. 179.
  35. ^Endress (2003), p. 29
  36. ^abcThe Cambridge History of Islam (1977), pp. 43–44
  37. ^Cohen (1995), p. 23
  38. ^abcFrancis Edward Peters (2003), p. 194.
  39. ^Watt (1961), p. 132.
  40. ^Watt (1964), pp. 124–125
  41. ^Watt (1961), p. 134
  42. ^abLewis (1960), p. 45.
  43. ^Rodinson (2002), pp. 177, 180.
  44. ^"Uhud",Encyclopedia of Islam.
  45. ^Watt (1964) p. 137
  46. ^Watt (1974) p. 137
  47. ^Watt (1974) p. 141
  48. ^Rodinson (2002), p. 183.
  49. ^Quran3:133-135, Quran3:160-162
  50. ^Watt (1964) p. 144.
  51. ^abWatt (1956), p. 30.
  52. ^Watt (1956), p. 34
  53. ^Watt (1956), p. 18
  54. ^Watt (1956), pp. 220–221
  55. ^Watt (1956), p. 35
  56. ^Watt (1956), p. 36, 37
  57. ^Rodinson (2002), pp. 209–211.
  58. ^Quran33:9-27
  59. ^Uri Rubin, Quraysh, Encyclopaedia of the Qur'an
  60. ^Peterson, Muhammad: the prophet of God, p. 126
  61. ^Tariq Ramadan, In the Footsteps of the Prophet, Oxford University Press, p. 141
  62. ^Francis Edward Peters (2003), p. 77
  63. ^F.E.Peters (2003), pp. 76–8.
  64. ^Watt (1956), p. 39
  65. ^Quran24:4
  66. ^Watt, M. "Aisha bint Abi Bakr". In P.J. Bearman; Th. Bianquis; C.E. Bosworth; E. van Donzel; W.P. Heinrichs (eds.).Encyclopaedia of Islam Online. Brill Academic Publishers.ISSN 1573-3912.
  67. ^Quran2:196-210
  68. ^Lings (1987), p. 249
  69. ^abLewis (2002), p. 42.
  70. ^Andrae; Menzel (1960) p. 156; See also: Watt (1964) p. 183
  71. ^ab"al-Hudaybiya", Encyclopedia of Islam
  72. ^Watt, W. Montgomery. "al- Hudaybiya or al-Hudaybiyya." Encyclopaedia of Islam.
  73. ^Lings (1987), p. 253
  74. ^abcWatt,al- Ḥudaybiya or al-Hudaybiyya,Encyclopaedia of Islam
  75. ^Quran48:1-29
  76. ^Lings (1987), p. 255
  77. ^Veccia Vaglieri, L. "Khaybar", Encyclopaedia of Islam
  78. ^abLings (1987), p. 260
  79. ^abKhan (1998), pp. 250–251
  80. ^Gabriel Said Reynolds,The Emergence of Islam (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2012), p. 49.
  81. ^F. Buhl,Muta,Encyclopedia of Islam
  82. ^Khan (1998), pp. 274–5.
  83. ^Mubarakpuri, Safi-ur-Rahman (2008).The Sealed Nectar: Biography of the Noble Prophet (2nd rev. ed.). Riyadh: Darussalam.ISBN 978-1-59144-070-3.OCLC 1148803557.
  84. ^Watt (1956), p. 66.
  85. ^Watt,Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman, Oxford University Press, p.207
  86. ^M.A. al-Bakhit,Tabuk,Encyclopedia of Islam
  87. ^Leila Ahmed (Summer 1986). "Women and the Advent of Islam".Signs.11 (4): 665–91 (686).doi:10.1086/494271.ISSN 0097-9740.JSTOR 3174138.S2CID 144943406.

Sources

[edit]
Relatives
Parents
Foster parents
Foster brothers and sisters
Wives
Descendants
Children
Grandchildren
Miracles
Events
People
Related topics
Related things
Books
Hadith
Books about
Sirat-un-Nabi
Durood
Places
Cities
Symbolic
Mosques
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Islamic_state&oldid=1323389315"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp