Afief (/fiːf/;Latin:feudum) was a central element in medieval contracts based onfeudal law. It consisted of a form of property holding or other rights granted by anoverlord to avassal, who held it infealty or "in fee" in return for a form of feudal allegiance, services or payments. The fees were often lands, land revenue orrevenue-producing real property like awatermill, held in feudalland tenure: these are typically known asfiefs orfiefdoms.[1] However, not only land but anything of value could be held in fee, including governmental office, rights of exploitation such as hunting, fishing or felling trees, monopolies in trade, money rents andtax farms.[1] There never existed a standard feudal system, nor did there exist only one type of fief. Over the ages, depending on the region, there was a broad variety of customs using the same basic legal principles in many variations.[2][3]
In ancient Rome, a "benefice" (from the Latin nounbeneficium, meaning "benefit") was a gift of land (precaria) for life as a reward for services rendered, originally, to the state. In medieval Latin European documents, a land grant in exchange for service continued to be called abeneficium (Latin).[4] Later, the termfeudum, orfeodum, replacedbeneficium in the documents.[4] The first attested instance of this is from 984, although more primitive forms were seen up to one hundred years earlier.[4] The origin of thefeudum and why it replacedbeneficium has not been well established, but there are multiple theories, described below.[4]
The most widely held theory is put forth byMarc Bloch[4][5][6] that it is related to the Frankish term*fehu-ôd, in which*fehu means "cattle" and-ôd means "goods", implying "a moveable object of value".[5][6] When land replaced currency as the primarystore of value, the Germanic word*fehu-ôd replaced the Latin wordbeneficium.[5][6] This Germanic origin theory was also shared byWilliam Stubbs in the 19th century.[4][7]
A theory put forward byArchibald R. Lewis[4] is that the origin of 'fief' is notfeudum (orfeodum), but ratherfoderum, the earliest attested use being inAstronomus'sVita Hludovici (840).[8] In that text is a passage aboutLouis the Pious which says"annona militaris quas vulgo foderum vocant", which can be translated as "(Louis forbade that) military provender which they popularly call 'fodder' (be furnished)."[4]
In the 10th and 11th centuries the Latin terms for 'fee' could be used either to describe dependent tenure held by a man from his lord, as the term is used now by historians, or it could mean simply "property" (themanor was, in effect, a small fief). It lacked a precise meaning until the middle of the 12th century, when it received formal definition from land lawyers.[citation needed]
In English usage, the word "fee" is first attested around 1250–1300 (Middle English); the word "fief" from around 1605–1615. In French, the termfief is found from the middle of the 13th century (Old French), derived from the 11th-century termsfeu,fie. The odd appearance of the secondf in the formfief may be due to influence from the verbfiever 'to grant in fee'.[9] In French, one also findsseigneurie (land and rights possessed by aseigneur or "lord", 12th century), which gives rise to the expression "seigneurial system" to describe feudalism.[citation needed]
Originally,vassalage did not imply the giving or receiving of landholdings (which were granted only as a reward for loyalty), but by the 8th century the giving of a landholding was becoming standard.[10] The granting of a landholding to a vassal did not relinquish the lord's property rights, but only the use of the lands and their income; the granting lord retained ultimate ownership of the fee and could, technically, recover the lands in case of disloyalty or death.[10] InFrancia,Charles Martel was the first to make large-scale and systematic use (the practice had remained sporadic until then) of the remuneration of vassals by the concession of the usufruct of lands (abeneficatium or "benefice" in the documents) for the life of the vassal, or, sometimes extending to the second or third generation.[11]
By the middle of the 10th century, fee had largely become hereditary.[12] The eldest son of a deceased vassal would inherit, but first he had to do homage and fealty to the lord and pay a "relief" for the land (a monetary recognition of the lord's continuing proprietary rights over the property).[citation needed]
Historically, the fees of the 11th and the 12th century derived from two separate sources. The first was land carved out of the estates of the upper nobility. The second source wasallodial land transformed into dependent tenures.[citation needed] During the 10th century in northern France and the 11th century in France south of theLoire, local magnates either recruited or forced the owners of allodial holdings into dependent relationships and they were turned into fiefs. The process occurred later in Germany, and was still going on in the 13th century.[citation needed]
In England,Henry II transformed them into important sources of royal income and patronage. The discontent ofbarons with royal claims to arbitrarily assessed "reliefs" and other feudal payments under Henry's sonKing John resulted inMagna Carta of 1215.[citation needed]
Eventually, great feudal lords sought also to seize governmental and legal authority (the collection of taxes, the right of high justice, etc.) in their lands, and some passed these rights to their own vassals.[12]
In 13th-century Germany, Italy, England, France, and Spain the term "feodum" was used to describe a dependent tenure held from a lord by a vassal in return for a specified amount ofknight service and occasional financial payments (feudal incidents).[citation needed]
However, knight service in war was far less common than:[citation needed]
suit in court, the vassal's obligation to attend the lord'scourt, to give him counsel, and to help him judge disputes;[citation needed]
attendance in the lord's entourage, accompanying the lord when he travelled or attended the court of his lord so as to increase the social status of the lord;
hospitality to the lord or to his servants (accommodation).[citation needed]
A lord in late 12th-century England and France could also claim the right of:[citation needed]
wardship and marriage – right to control descent of fee by choosing a husband for a female heir and a guardian for minors (preferably in consultation with the heir's closest male adult kinsmen);[citation needed]
"aids" – payments to aid the lord in times of need (customarily given to the lord to cover the cost of knighting the eldest son, marriage of the eldest daughter, and forransoming the lord if required);
escheat – the reversion of the fief to the lord in default of an heir.[13]
In northern France in the 12th and 13th centuries, military service for fiefs was limited for offensive campaigns to 40 days for a knight. By the 12th century, English and French kings and barons began to commute military service for cash payments (scutages), with which they could purchase the service ofmercenaries.[13]
A list of several hundred such fees heldin chief between 1198 and 1292, along with their holders' names and form of tenure, was published in three volumes between 1920 and 1931 and is known asThe Book of Fees; it was developed from the 1302Testa de Nevill.
TheBailiwick of Guernsey is a group of several of the Channel Islands that is aCrown Dependency. Guernsey still hasfeudal law and legal fiefs in existence today. Each fief has aSeigneur or Dame that owns the fief. The Guernsey fiefs and seigneurs existed long before baronies, and are historically part ofNormandy. While nobility has been outlawed in France and Germany, noble fiefs still exist by law in Guernsey. The owners of the fiefs actually convene each year at theCourt of Chief Pleas under the supervision of His Majesty's Government. There are approximately 24 private fiefs in Guernsey that are registered directly with the Crown.
^Reynolds, Susan(Wikipedia article Susan Reynolds) (1994).Fiefs and Vassals: The Medieval Evidence Reinterpreted. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
^abcdefghMeir Lubetski (ed.).Boundaries of the ancient Near Eastern world: a tribute to Cyrus H. Gordon. "Notices on Pe'ah, Fay' and Feudum" by Alauddin Samarrai.Pg. 248-250Archived 2015-10-29 at theWayback Machine, Continuum International Publishing Group, 1998.
^abcMarc Bloch.Feudal Society, Vol. 1, 1964. pp. 165–166.
Stéphane Lebecq.Les origines franques: Ve-IXe siècles. Series: Nouvelle histoire de la France médiévale. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1999.ISBN2-02-011552-2
Brown, Elizabeth A. R. (October 1974). "The Tyranny of a Construct: Feudalism and Historians of Medieval Europe".American Journal of Ophthalmology.79 (4):1063–1088.
_(cropped).svg)
