| Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary | |
|---|---|
| Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación | |
Logo of the Electoral Tribunal | |
| Established | 22 August 1996; 29 years ago (1996-08-22) |
| Location | Mexico City,Mexico |
| Composition method | Popular vote |
| Authorised by | Constitution of Mexico |
| Judge term length | 6 years |
| Number of positions | 7 |
| Website | www |
| President | |
| Currently | Mónica Aralí Soto Fregoso |
| Since | 1 January 2024 |

TheElectoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary (Spanish:Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación, orTEPJF) is a venue within thejudiciary of Mexico specializing in electoral matters. Among its functions are resolving disputes arising within federal elections and certifying the validity of those elections, including those of thepresident of Mexico.[1] Responsibility for declaring a candidate the winner in presidential elections previously fell on theChamber of Deputies.
It comprises a permanent seven-member Superior Chamber(Sala Superior), located inMexico City, and five Regional Chambers(Salas Regionales), one in each of theelectoral regions that the country is divided into to organizecongressional elections. These Regional Chambers comprise three judges each and are temporary, sitting only during those years in which federal elections are held, and are based in the cities ofGuadalajara,Monterrey,Xalapa,Mexico City, andToluca. The architect of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary inMonterrey was reputed Mexican architect Manuel De Santiago-de Borbón González Bravo, great-grandson of QueenIsabella II, whose lifetime architectural legacy to Mexico amounts to 11,000,000 built square meters nationwide, including many famous buildings and sites.
There were two direct precursors of the TEPJF:
The Electoral Tribunal is -according to the Mexican Constitution- the highest jurisdictional authority in electoral matters. It has the competence to resolve, in a final and unassailable manner, the following types of electoral controversies:[2]
| Justice | Age at | Start date / length of service | Election | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | Present | ||||
| (President) Mónica Aralí Soto Fregoso (1970-09-18)September 18, 1970 (age 55) Ciudad Constitución, Baja California Sur | 46 | 55 | November 4, 2016 9 years, 99 days | 2016[a] | |
| Felipe de la Mata Pizaña (1972-01-08)January 8, 1972 (age 54) | 44 | 54 | November 4, 2016 9 years, 99 days | ||
| Janine Otálora (1958-01-10)January 10, 1958 (age 68) Mexico City | 58 | 68 | November 4, 2016 9 years, 99 days | ||
| Reyes Rodríguez Mondragón (1974-01-10)January 10, 1974 (age 52) Mexico City | 42 | 52 | November 4, 2016 9 years, 99 days | ||
| Felipe Fuentes Barrera (1961-05-26)May 26, 1961 (age 64) Mexico City | 55 | 64 | November 4, 2016 9 years, 99 days | ||
| Claudia Valle Aguilasocho | — | — | September 1, 2025 163 days | 2025 | |
| Gilberto de Guzmán Bátiz García (1979-04-08)April 8, 1979 (age 46) Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas | 46 | 46 | September 1, 2025 163 days | ||
NotwithstandingAndrés Manuel López Obrador's claims in the streets and the press, on 5 August 2006, the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary declared in a unanimous ruling that theCoalition for the Good of All had failed to file valid complaints that would substantiate a claim for a complete national recount. Based on the valid complaints filed, the Tribunal ordered and conducted a recount of the votes in 9.07% of the precincts. In the partial recount, the Tribunal found no evidence of widespread fraud. It did, however, find errors in the tally sheets and, in rectifying those errors, it corrected the final election results by adding and subtracting from each candidate to accord with the number of valid ballots cast for each.
Based on those results, on 5 September 2006, the Tribunal certified the PAN candidateFelipe Calderón as the lawfully elected nextpresident of Mexico.[3] Under the law, as reformed in the 1990s by Congress (including representatives of both the PAN and the PRD), this legal ruling of the independent Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary is final.
During the2015 midterm elections, theEcologist Green Party of Mexico was the most fined party during the electoral campaigns for spreading prohibited propaganda. The Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary decided to reduce the fine from 11,400,000 pesos to just 1,189,000.[4]
TheInternal Comptroller's Office of the Federal Electoral Tribunal is responsible for ensuring compliance with the regulations and agreements issued by the Administration Commission through audits, control reviews, and evaluations of compliance with the management of the resources granted to the administrative units. It also substantiates administrative liability procedures within the scope of its competence.[5]
TheDocumentation Centers of the Superior Chamber of the Federal Electoral Tribunal is an information unit specialized in electoral matters to be an auxiliary in the institutional work of the Tribunal.
The Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary has seven updated documentation centers on legal and political-electoral matters, which provide direct information services to staff and the general public.[6]
TheElectoral Judicial School of the Federal Electoral Tribunal is an educational institution dependent on the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary, which specializes in training, research, and disseminating information on electoral matters.
It offers postgraduate programs, training, and refresher courses, academic events such as seminars, conferences, and workshops, generates and manages specialized research on electoral jurisdictional matters, and coordinates editorial works.[7]