TheFederal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA,Pub. L. 92–225, 86 Stat. 3, enactedFebruary 7, 1972,52 U.S.C. § 30101et seq.) is the primaryUnited States federal law regulatingpolitical campaign fundraising and spending. The law originally focused on creating limits for campaign spending on communication media, adding additional penalties to the criminal code for election law violations, and imposing disclosure requirements for federalpolitical campaigns.[1] The Act was signed into law by PresidentRichard Nixon on February 7, 1972.[2]
WHEN I vetoed the bill to limit expenditures on political broadcasting in October of 1970, I pointed out that the goal of controlling campaign expenditures was a highly laudable one. The chief problem with the bill then before me was that it did not limit overall costs but applied only to radio and television. As I put it then, it plugged "only one hole in a sieve."
Since that time, the House and Senate have worked to design a better bill. I believe they have succeeded in that endeavor. S. 382, the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, limits the amount candidates for Federal elective offices may spend on advertising, not just on radio and television, but through all communications media. It limits contributions by candidates and their families to their own campaigns. It provides for full reporting of both the sources and the uses of campaign funds, both after elections and during campaigns. By giving the American public full access to the facts of political financing, this legislation will guard against campaign abuses and will work to build public confidence in the integrity of the electoral process.
The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 is a realistic and enforceable bill, an important step forward in an area which has been of great public concern. Because I share that concern, I am pleased to give my approval to this bill.
In 1974, the act was amended to create theFederal Election Commission (FEC) and to further regulate campaign spending. The act was amended again in 1976, in response to the provisions ruled unconstitutional byBuckley v. Valeo, including the structure of the FEC and the limits on campaign expenditures, and again in 1979 to allow parties to spend unlimited amounts ofhard money on activities like increasing voter turnout and registration. In 1979, the FEC ruled that political parties could spend unregulated or "soft" money for non-federal administrative and party building activities. Later, this money was used for candidate-related issue ads, which led to a substantial increase in soft money contributions and expenditures in elections. This in turn led to passage of theBipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 ("BCRA"), effective on January 1, 2003, which banned soft money expenditure by parties. Some of the legal limits on giving of "hard money" were also changed by BCRA.
As early as 1905,Theodore Roosevelt argued in favor ofcampaign finance reform and called for a ban of corporate contributions for political purposes. In response, theUnited States Congress passed theTillman Act of 1907, which banned the corporate contributions. Further regulation followed in theFederal Corrupt Practices Act enacted in 1910, and subsequent amendments in 1910 and 1925, theHatch Act, theSmith–Connally Act of 1943, and theTaft–Hartley Act in 1947. These acts sought to regulate corporate and union spending in campaigns for federal office, and mandated public disclosure of campaign donors.
In 1970, President Nixon vetoed the Political Broadcast Act of 1970, a bill that aimed to establish laws regulating campaign spending on television and radio.[3] President Nixon claimed that the Political Broadcast Act did not sufficiently limit campaign expenditures, noting that it "plugged only one hole in a sieve."[4] This bill was an attempt to regulate election spending, but despite having the necessary membership to override the veto, Senate Democrats did not pass the law without the President's signature.[5] Subsequently, SenatorMike Mansfield introduced S. 382, later to be known as FECA, to the Senate on January 26, 1971 in the92nd Congress.
The Act was first introduced to the Senate Subcommittee on Communications of the Committee on Commerce on March 2, 1971 by SenatorJohn Pastore.[6] After passing the Senate Committee on Commerce by a vote of 18–0,[7] the Act passed the Senate floor on August 5, 1971 by a vote of 88-2.[8]
In the House, the Act passed on November 30, 1971 by a vote of 372–23.[9] Because the House version was not identical to the Senate version, aconference committee was called. On December 14, 1971, the Senate agreed to the conference report,[10] and on January 19, 1972, the House agreed to the conference report,[11] sending the bill to President Nixon.
The Act limited campaign expenditures for broadcast media, newspaper advertisement, and telephone calls to $0.10 per voter in the district they're running in when adjusted for inflation using theconsumer price index.[10] The Act also limited the amount campaigns could spend on broadcast media to 60% of their total campaign spending limitation. Additionally, the Act required broadcast and non-broadcast media to charge the lowest unit rate for advertisements for all candidates within the 45 days leading up to a primary election and the 60 days leading up to a general election.[12] Despite several debates on the issue, the Act did not repeal Section 315 of theCommunications Act of 1934, a requirement that media companies offer equal broadcast time to candidates for federal office.[13]
Promises of rewards or gifts were prohibited under FECA, meaning that a candidate for office could not offer employment or other benefits in exchange for donations or other forms of political aid. The Act also placed a cap on the amount a candidate could spend of their own money on their campaign at $50,000 for Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates, $35,000 for Senate candidates, and $25,000 for candidates for the House of Representatives.[12]
Violations of the policies outlined in the Act carried fines of up to $1,000 and up to one year of imprisonment, or both.[14]
The Act required candidates for federal office to disclose the expenditures they made and contributions they received if those amounts totaled more than $100. Candidates were also required to disclose the structure and membership of their political committees if they intended to receive and spend more than $1,000 during a calendar year.[12] Political committees were required to keep track of the name, occupation, address, and amount that any person contributes if that amount exceeded $10.[14] Additionally, the Act outlawed making contributions in the name of another person or knowingly accepting contributions that are being made in the name of another person.[14]
Reports were to be sent to theComptroller General of theGovernment Accountability Office for Presidential elections, the Secretary of the Senate for Senatorial elections, and the Clerk of the House for House of Representatives elections.[11] Candidates were also required to report finances to the Secretary of State's office in the state they are running for elected office in.[10]
Following the 1972 Presidential election, Congress amended the FECA in 1974 to set limits on contributions by individuals, political parties and PACs. The 1974 amendments also established an independent agency, theFederal Election Commission (FEC) to enforce the law, facilitate disclosure and administer the public funding program. The FEC commenced in 1975 and administered the first publicly funded presidential election in 1976.
In 1976, theSupreme Court inBuckley v. Valeo struck down several key provisions of the 1974 amendments, including limits on spending by candidate campaigns, limits on the ability of citizens to spend money independently of a campaign, and limits on the amount of money a candidate could donate to his or her own campaign. The case also substantially narrowed the category of independent political expenditures subject to mandatory donor disclosure.
Further amendments to the FECA were made in 1976 to conform the law with the ruling inBuckley v. Valeo. Major amendments were also made in 1979 to streamline the disclosure process and expand the role of political parties.
In 2002, major revisions to the FECA were made by theBipartisan Campaign Reform Act, more commonly referred to as "McCain–Feingold." However, major portions of McCain-Feingold were struck down by the Supreme Court on constitutional grounds inFederal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (2007),Davis v. Federal Election Commission (2008) andCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010). The Citizens United ruling also struck down FECA's complete ban on corporate and union independent spending, originally passed as part of theTaft–Hartley Act in 1947.[15]
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
.jpg)
