The jurisdiction of the State Duma includes: consent to the appointment of thePrime Minister (Chairman of the Government), deciding the issue of confidence in the Government, appointment and dismissal of the Governor of theCentral Bank, appointment and dismissal of the Chairman and half of the auditors of the Accounts Chamber, appointment and dismissal of theCommissioner for Human Rights, proclamation ofamnesty, advancing of charges against the President for his impeachment and others.[7]
As the Russian legislature, all laws must be voted in the Federal Assembly before they are signed into law. All bills, even those proposed by the Federation Council, must first be considered by the State Duma. Upon adoption by a majority of the full State Duma membership, a draft law is considered by the Federation Council, which has fourteen days to place the bill on its calendar. The Federation Council cannot make changes in bills passed by the Duma and can either approve or reject them. If the Federation Council rejects a bill passed by the State Duma, the two chambers must form a conciliation commission to work out a compromise version of the legislation. If two chambers cannot reach a compromise, or the Duma insists on passing the billas is, the veto of the Federation Council can be overridden, if two thirds of the Duma's constitutional composition vote in favor of the bill.
The State Duma and the Federation Council usually meet separately. Joint sessions are organized when:
In the mid 2000s it was suggested that the Parliamentary centre of theState Duma andFederation Council be combined into one building.[12][13] In 2012, the idea was supported by PresidentDmitry Medvedev.[14] Reasons cited for the construction of a new building included the cramped nature of the parliament members' current offices, the remote locations of these offices split across ten locations inMoscow, and the desire of the government to move the bodies away from the city centre to reduce traffic congestion.
The design of the new building was to be decided on the basis of an architectural competition.[16] The parliamentarians, however, disagreed on aesthetic decisions between candidates in the competition, which were not resolved when the contest was conducted a second time.[17]
Financing issues caused complications. Originally, the Parliamentary center was to be funded by private investors, who would in turn receive ownership of a building currently belonging to the State Duma and the Federation Council, as well as permits to tear it down and replace the building with their own development projects (such as hotels). An objection to this plan was lodged by architectural critic Grigory Revzin, arguing that the State Duma is located in thebuilding of the Council of Labor and Defense which was designed byArkady Langman and built in 1935, rendering the existing State Duma building an architectural monument, which would be protected by the state and cannot be demolished.
Work on the parliamentary center was to begin in 2020.[18] However, in 2016 it was postponed to an unknown date due to the economic situation and disagreements on what the center should look like.[19]
^Rosefielde, Steven; Hedlund, Stefan (2009).Russia Since 1980. Cambridge University Press. p. 174.ISBN9780521849135. Retrieved16 June 2023.Duma election of 2003, reducing the legislature to a rubber stamp.