TheFIVB Senior World Rankings is a ranking system for men's and women's national teams involleyball. The teams of the member nations ofFédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB), volleyball's world governing body, are ranked based on their game results with the most successful teams being ranked highest. A points system is used, with points being awarded based on the results of all FIVB-recognised full international matches. The rankings are used in international competitions to define the seeded teams and arrange them in pools. Specific procedures for seeding and pooling are established by the FIVB in each competition's formula, but the method usually employed is theserpentine system.

The ranking system has been revamped in 2020, responding to criticism that the preceding calculation method did not effectively reflect the relative strengths of the national teams. The old version of the ranking system was finally used on 31 January 2020.

As of 8 January 2025, the highest ranked team in the men's category isPoland, while in the women's category isItaly.

The system of point attribution for the selected FIVB World and Official Competitions below is as follows:^[1]

• Olympic Games and qualifying tournaments: included for 4 years and points are also granted for the qualification matches, to the best non-qualified teams.
• World Championship and qualifying tournaments: included for 4 years and points are also granted for the qualification matches, to the best non-qualified teams.
• World Cup: included for 4 years
• World Grand Prix: included for 1 year
• World League: included for 1 year

In 2019, FIVB collaborated with Hypercube Business Innovation of the Netherlands to design a new world ranking platform. The previous calculation method had a problem of circularity in the international volleyball calendar: only countries who participated in the major volleyball events could earn ranking points, whilst the number of ranking points of countries also determined the seeding and access to major events. This unfair principle did not contribute to the sporting and commercial quality of volleyball.^[2]

On 1 February 2020, the new ranking system was implemented and took into account all results from 1 January 2019 and later.^[3] The system is consistently updated to reflect the latest results and performances. The ranking considers the match results from:

• Olympic Games and qualifying tournaments
• FIVB World Championship
• FIVB World Cup
• FIVB Nations League and Challenger Cup
• Confederations' Championship and qualifying tournaments
• Annual Official Continental Confederations' Events
• Annual Official Zonal Associations' Events

Notes:^[4][5]

• Olympic qualifying tournaments, FIVB World Cup and FIVB Challenger Cup are discontinued tournaments (as of 2025).
• Official competitions must feature a minimum of four senior national teams to be eligible for world ranking points.
• Matches played in multi-sport events, friendly matches or unofficial competitions are not eligible for world ranking points.
• From 2023: Matches from Annual Continental and Zonal Events are not considered for the world ranking if they involve teams that are also participating in the FIVB Volleyball Nations League (VNL) in the same year.
• From 2025: Each Continental Confederation may include up to two Annual Continental Events in the world ranking.
• From 2025: Each Zonal Association may include one Annual Zonal Event in the world ranking.

The rankings outcome of each match depends on two main factors:

• The playing strength of the teams competing.
• The actual match performance or final result of the match.

It is based on the zero-sum system, likeCONCACAF Ranking Index orFIFA World ranking, where, after each game, points will be added to or subtracted from a team's rating according to the formula:^[6]

${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}=S_{\text{before}}+\frac{K(R-E)}{8}}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}}$ – the team's number ofWorld Ranking scores after the game
• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{before}}}$ – the team's number ofWorld Ranking scores before the game
• ${\displaystyle K}$ – the match weight factor; see below
• ${\displaystyle R}$ – the result of the game depended on match and sets won (3–0, 3–1, 3–2, 2–3, 1–3 or 0–3); see below
• ${\displaystyle E}$ – the expected result of the game has the value between -2 and +2. If the match is completely balanced, the expected result is 0. The bigger the surprise, the more points are transferred; see below for calculation details.

A key principle of the world ranking is that a team winning a match cannot lose ranking points and a team losing a match cannot gain ranking points.^[7] Hence, if a team wins a match but the result is lower than expected, with, the team will be rewarded with the minimum ranking points (0.01), i.e.

${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}=S_{\text{before}}+0.01}$

The team that lost the match will instead lose the minimum ranking points (0.01), i.e.

${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}=S_{\text{before}}-0.01}$

The match weight factor is set to reflect the prestige of the tournament. In 2025, FIVB changed the match weight factors for some events:^[8]

Event	Match weight factor${\displaystyle (K)}$
	2019–2024[4]	2025–[5]
Annual Official Zonal Events	–	30.0
Annual Official Continental Events	10.0	30.0
Continental Championship qualifying	17.5	–
FIVB Challenger Cup	20.0	–
Olympic Games qualifying / FIVB World Cup	35.0	–
Continental Championship	35.0	40.0
FIVB Nations League	40.0	40.0
FIVB World Championship	45.0	50.0
Olympic Games	50.0	50.0

We set the result${\displaystyle R=R_n}$, where${\displaystyle n}$ is the index of the actual result (set score) ${\displaystyle n=1}$ – A win3–0 ${\displaystyle n=2}$ – A win3–1 ${\displaystyle n=3}$ – A win3–2 ${\displaystyle n=4}$ – A lose2–3 ${\displaystyle n=5}$ – A lose1–3 ${\displaystyle n=6}$ – A lose0–3

Match Result ${\displaystyle R_n}$ ${\displaystyle P_n}$ A win 3–0 +2 ${\displaystyle P\text{1}}$ A win 3–1 +1.5 ${\displaystyle P\text{2}}$ A win 3–2 +1 ${\displaystyle P\text{3}}$ A lose 2–3 -1 ${\displaystyle P\text{4}}$ A lose 1–3 -1.5 ${\displaystyle P\text{5}}$ A lose 0–3 -2 ${\displaystyle P\text{6}}$

The expected results is then calculated as${\displaystyle E=R_1{P}_1+R_2{P}_2+R_3{P}_3+R_4{P}_4+R_5{P}_5+R_6{P}_6}$where${\displaystyle P_n}$ is the probability of the outcome${\displaystyle R_n}$ obtained using the following model (known asOrdered probit):

Team A win 3–0

${\displaystyle P_{\text{1}}=\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{1}}+\mathrm{\Delta })}$

Team A win 3–1

${\displaystyle P_{\text{2}}=\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{2}}+\mathrm{\Delta })-\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{1}}+\mathrm{\Delta })}$

Team A win 3–2

${\displaystyle P_{\text{3}}=\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{3}}+\mathrm{\Delta })-\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{2}}+\mathrm{\Delta })}$

Team A lose 2–3

${\displaystyle P_{\text{4}}=\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{4}}+\mathrm{\Delta })-\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{3}}+\mathrm{\Delta })}$

Team A lose 1–3

${\displaystyle P_{\text{5}}=\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{5}}+\mathrm{\Delta })-\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{4}}+\mathrm{\Delta })}$

Team A lose 0–3

${\displaystyle P_{\text{6}}=1-\mathrm{\Phi }(C_{\text{5}}+\mathrm{\Delta })}$

where${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Phi }(z)}$ is the Cumulative distribution function of theNormal distribution, and${\displaystyle C_1,\dots ,C_5}$ are the cut-points

• ${\displaystyle C_1=-1.06}$
• ${\displaystyle C_2=-0.394}$
• ${\displaystyle C_3=0}$
• ${\displaystyle C_4=0.394}$
• ${\displaystyle C_5=1.06}$

set so that${\displaystyle P_n}$ is the probability of the outcome${\displaystyle n}$ between two equal strength opponents (that is when${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Delta }=0}$), which is derived from the actual match results of the past decade.

The parameter${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Delta }}$ represents the scaled difference of the teams rankings

${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Delta }=\frac{8(S_{\text{teamA}}-S_{\text{teamB}})}{1000}}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{teamA}}}$ – the team A's number ofWorld Ranking scores before the game
• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{teamB}}}$ – the team B's number ofWorld Ranking scores before the game

Before the match at theFIVB Volleyball World Championship (K = 50), Brazil(Team A) is ranked number 1 with a415 WR score and Japan(Team B) is ranked number 11 with a192 WR score.^[7]

Strength difference between Brazil and Japan

${\displaystyle \mathrm{\Delta }=\frac{8(415-192)}{1000}=1.784}$

Expected match result

• ${\displaystyle P_1=\mathrm{\Phi }(-1.060+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_2=\mathrm{\Phi }(-0.364+1.784)-\mathrm{\Phi }(-1.060+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_3=\mathrm{\Phi }(0.000+1.784)-\mathrm{\Phi }(-0.364+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_4=\mathrm{\Phi }(0.364+1.784)-\mathrm{\Phi }(0.000+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_5=\mathrm{\Phi }(1.060+1.784)-\mathrm{\Phi }(0.364+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_6=1-\mathrm{\Phi }(1.060+1.784)}$

Expected match result for Brazil:

${\displaystyle E=76.5\mathrm{\%}(+2)+15.2\mathrm{\%}(+1.5)+4.5\mathrm{\%}(+1)+2.2\mathrm{\%}(-1)+1.2\mathrm{\%}(-1.5)+0.2\mathrm{\%}(-2)=+1.76}$

Expected match result for Japan:

${\displaystyle E=0.2\mathrm{\%}(+2)+1.2\mathrm{\%}(+1.5)+2.2\mathrm{\%}(+1)+4.5\mathrm{\%}(-1)+15.2\mathrm{\%}(-1.5)+76.5\mathrm{\%}(-2)=-1.76}$

Every year on 1 January, the teams that have not played any matches that counts towards the world ranking in the previous two years lose 50 ranking points. The inactive teams with less than 20 ranking points are removed from the official ranking list.^[5]

Previously, teams were considered inactive after one year without participating in competitions eligible for ranking points. This was extended to two years in 2025.^[8]

The five Continental Rankings filter the World Ranking points won and lost in matches played between teams from the same Continental Confederation.

• Intercontinental Tournaments –calculated inWorld Rankings, but some matches can be calculated inContinental Rankings
  • Olympic Games final and intercontinental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB World Championship final and intercontinental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB World Cup
  • FIVB Volleyball Nations League and Challenger Cup
  • some Continental Cups: Pan-America
  • some FIVB recognised international events, e.g.Pan American Games,Montreux Volley Masters

• Continental Tournaments –calculated inWorld andContinental Rankings
  • Olympic Games continental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB World Championship continental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB Challenger Cup qualification tournaments
  • Continental Championships:Asia (AVC),Africa (CAVB),Europe (CEV),North America (NORCECA), andSouth America (CSV)
  • some Continental Cups:Asia (both AVC Cup and Challenge Cup)
  • Zonal Championships, e.g. Eastern Asia,ASEAN, Central America
  • some FIVB recognised international events, e.g.African Games,Asian Games,European Games

Examples

Japan (Asian Volleyball Confederation) vs Italy (Confédération Européenne de Volleyball)
The points calculated in FIVB World Rankings.

Japan (Asian Volleyball Confederation) vs South Korea (Asian Volleyball Confederation)
The points calculated in FIVB World Rankings, and AVC Continental Rankings.

Current men's top teams

[edit]

Top 30 rankings as of 5 October 2025[9]
Rank	Change	Team	Points
1		Poland	390.96
2		Italy	385.02
3		Brazil	338.4
4		France	328.22
5		United States	324.35
6		Slovenia	303.61
7		Japan	294.77
8		Argentina	269
9		Bulgaria	261.3
10		Canada	252.99
11		Germany	247.4
12		Cuba	243.14
13		Serbia	233.34
14		Turkey	230.09
15		Belgium	225.86
16		Iran	209.02
17		Ukraine	202.85
18		Czech Republic	201.25
19		Finland	188.93
20		Netherlands	180.95
21		Qatar	164.99
22		Puerto Rico	147.9
23		Portugal	145.04
24		Romania	141.7
25		Greece	137.44
26		South Korea	137.28
27		Egypt	136.56
28		China	129.01
29		Chile	125.32
30		Mexico	121.91
*Change from 8 January 2025
Complete rankings at volleyballworld.com

Current women's top teams

[edit]

Top 30 rankings as of 29 June 2025[10]
Rank	Change	Team	Points
1		Italy	456.91
2		Brazil	417.92
3		Poland	369.04
4		Turkey	368.54
5		Japan	347.08
6		China	346.75
7		United States	338.1
8		Netherlands	262.59
9		Dominican Republic	254.02
10		Canada	245.38
11		Serbia	234.19
12		Germany	234.08
13		Czech Republic	208.84
14		Belgium	190.98
15		Ukraine	189.05
16		France	182.65
17		Puerto Rico	182.58
18		Argentina	180.96
19		Thailand	173.1
20		Bulgaria	169.78
21		Sweden	153.59
22		Colombia	152.37
23		Kenya	152.15
24		Cuba	145.17
25		Slovenia	142.69
26	6	Vietnam	141.21
27	1	Mexico	138.42
28	1	Romania	136.33
29	1	Slovakia	128.54
30	1	Hungary	127.51
*Change from 8 January 2025
Complete rankings at volleyballworld.com

Historic men's leaders

[edit]

For historical men's FIVB rankings from October 2005 to present.^[11]

Historic women's leaders

[edit]

For historical women's FIVB rankings from September 2005 to present.^[12]

• FIVB Senior Continental Rankings
• FIVB Youth and Junior World Rankings

• Fédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB)."FIVB World Rankings". Retrieved2022-12-18.

• Fédération Internationale de Volleyball
• Volleyball-related lists
• Sports world rankings

• Pages using the EasyTimeline extension
• Articles with short description
• Short description matches Wikidata