Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Introduced species

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromExotic species)
Species introduced by human activity
"Alien species" redirects here. For life on planets other than Earth, seeExtraterrestrial life.
CattleBos primigenius taurus introduced but not naturalized worldwide
Sweet clover (Melilotus sp.), introduced andnaturalized in theAmericas fromEurope as a forage and cover crop

Anintroduced species,alien species,exotic species,adventive species,immigrant species,foreign species,non-indigenous species, ornon-native species is aspecies living outside itsnative distributionalrange, but which has arrived there byhuman activity, directly or indirectly, and either deliberately or accidentally. Non-native species can have various effects on the local ecosystem. Introduced species that become established and spread beyond the place of introduction are considerednaturalized. The process of human-caused introduction is distinguished frombiological colonization, in which species spread to new areas through "natural" (non-human) means such as storms andrafting. The Latin expressionneobiota captures the characteristic that these species arenewbiota to their environment in terms of establishedbiological network (e.g.food web) relationships. Neobiota can further be divided intoneozoa (also: neozoons, sing. neozoon, i.e. animals) andneophyta (plants).

The impact of introduced species is highly variable. Some have a substantial negative effect on a local ecosystem (in which case they are also classified more specifically as aninvasive species), while other introduced species may have little or no negative impact (no invasiveness), and integrate well into the ecosystem they have been introduced to. Some species have been introduced intentionally to combat pests. They are calledbiocontrols and may be regarded as beneficial as an alternative to pesticides in agriculture for example. In some instances the potential for being beneficial or detrimental in the long run remains unknown.[1][2][3] The effects of introduced species on natural environments have gained much scrutiny from scientists, governments, farmers and others.

Terminology

[edit]

The formal definition of an introduced species from theUnited States Environmental Protection Agency is "A species that has been intentionally or inadvertently brought into a region or area. Also called an exotic or non-native species".[4][5]

In the broadest and most widely used sense, an introduced species is synonymous with "non-native" and therefore applies as well to most garden and farm organisms; these adequately fit the basic definition given above. However, some sources add to that basic definition "and are now reproducing in the wild",[6] which means that species growing in a garden, farm, or house may not meet the criteria unless they escape and persist.

Subset descriptions

[edit]
See also:Glossary of invasion biology terms

There are many terms associated with introduced species that represent subsets of introduced species, and the terminology associated with introduced species is now in flux for various reasons. Examples of these terms are "invasive", "acclimatized", "adventive", "naturalized", and "immigrant" species.

The term "invasive" is used to describe introduced species that cause ecological, economic, or other damage to the area in which they were introduced.

Acclimatized species are introduced species that have changed physically and/or behaviorally in order to adjust to their new environment. Acclimatized species are not necessarily optimally adjusted to their new environment and may just be physically/behaviorally sufficient for the new environment.

Adventive species are often considered synonymous with "introduced species", but this term is sometimes applied exclusively to introduced species that are not permanently established.[7]

Naturalized species are often introduced species that do not need human help to reproduce and maintain their population in an area outside their native range (no longer adventive), but that also applies to populations migrating and establishing in a novel environment (e.g.: inEurope,house sparrows are well established since earlyIron Age though they originated fromAsia).

Immigrant species are species that travel, sometimes by themselves, but often with human help, between two habitats. Invasiveness is not a requirement.[8]

Invasive species

[edit]

Introduction of a species outside its native range is all that is required to be qualified as an "introduced species". Such species might be termednaturalized, "established", or "wild non-native species". If they further spread beyond the place of introduction and cause damage to nearby species, they are called "invasive species". The transition from introduction, to establishment and to invasion has been described in the context of plants.[9] Introduced species are essentially "non-native" species. Invasive species are those introduced species that spread widely or quickly and cause harm, be that to the environment,[10] human health, other valued resources, or the economy. There have been calls from scientists to consider a species "invasive" only in terms of their spread and reproduction rather than the harm they may cause.[11]

According to a practical definition, an invasive species is one that has been introduced and become a pest in its new location, spreading (invading) by natural means. The term is used to imply both a sense of urgency and actual or potential harm. For example, U.S. Executive Order 13112 (1999) defines "invasive species" as "an alien species whose introduction does or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health".[12] The biological definition of invasive species, on the other hand, makes no reference to the harm they may cause, only to the fact that they spread beyond the area of original introduction.

Some argue that "invasive" is a loaded word and harm is difficult to define.[6]

From a regulatory perspective, it is neither desirable nor practical to list as undesirable or outright ban all non-native species (although theState of Hawaii has adopted an approach that comes close to this). Regulations require a definitional distinction between non-natives that are deemed especially onerous and all others. Introduced "pest" species, that are officially listed as invasive, best fit the definition of an invasive species. Early detection and rapid response is the most effective strategy for regulating a pest species and reducing economic and environmental impacts of an introduction.[13] Management of invasion pathways are on the forefront of eliminating unwanted invasive species this would include preliminary steps; educating the public, cooperation from industries and government resources.[14]

InGreat Britain, theWildlife and Countryside Act 1981 prevents the introduction of any animal not naturally occurring in the wild or any of a list of both animals or plants introduced previously and proved to be invasive.

Nature of introductions

[edit]
This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Introduced species" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(June 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Bydefinition, a species is considered "introduced" when its transport into an area outside of its native range is human mediated. Introductions by humans can be described as either intentional or accidental. Intentional introductions have been motivated by individuals or groups who either (1) believe that the newly introduced species will be in some way beneficial to humans in its new location or, (2) species are introduced intentionally but with no regard to the potential impact. Unintentional or accidental introductions are most often a byproduct of human movements and are thus unbound to human motivations. Subsequent range expansion of introduced species may or may not involve human activity.

WheatTriticum introduced worldwide from its place of origin (Mesopotamia)

Intentional introductions

[edit]

Species that humans intentionally transport to new regions can subsequently become successfully established in two ways. In the first case, organisms are purposely released for establishment in the wild. It is sometimes difficult to predict whether a species will become established upon release, and if not initially successful, humans have made repeated introductions to improve the probability that the species will survive and eventually reproduce in the wild. In these cases, it is clear that the introduction is directly facilitated by human desires.

Malesilver pheasant

In the second case, species intentionally transported into a new region may escape from captive or cultivated populations and subsequently establish independent breeding populations. Escaped organisms are included in this category because their initial transport to a new region is human motivated.

The widespread phenomena of intentional introduction has also been described asbiological globalization.

Positive Introductions

Although most introduced species have negative impacts on the ecosystems they enter into, there are still some species that have affected the ecosystem in a positive way. For example, in New Hampshire invasive plants can provide some benefits to some species. Invasive species such as autumn olive, oriental bittersweet, and honeysuckle produce fruit that is used by a handful of fruit-eating bird species.[15] The invasive plants can also be a source of pollen and nectar for many insects, such as bees. These invasive plants were able to help their ecosystem thriving, and increase the native animal's chances of survival. Several introduced exotic trees served as nest sites for resident waterbird species in Udaipur city, India.[16]

Motivations for intentional introductions

[edit]
Economic
[edit]

Perhaps the most common motivation for introducing a species into a new place is that of economic gain. Non-native species can become such a common part of an environment, culture, and even diet that little thought is given to their geographic origin. For example,soybeans,kiwi fruit,wheat,honey bees, and alllivestock except theAmerican bison and theturkey are non-native species to North America. Collectively, non-native crops and livestock account for 98% of US food.[17] These and other benefits from non-natives are so vast that, according to the Congressional Research Service, they probably exceed the costs.[18]

Other examples of species introduced for the purposes of benefitingagriculture,aquaculture or other economic activities are widespread.[19]Eurasian carp was first introduced to the United States as a potential food source. Theapple snail was released in Southeast Asia with the intent that it be used as a protein source, and subsequently to places like Hawaii to establish a food industry. In Alaska,foxes were introduced to many islands to create new populations for the fur trade. About twenty species of African and Europeandung beetles have established themselves in Australia after deliberate introduction by theAustralian Dung Beetle Project in an effort to reduce the impact of livestock manure. The timber industry promoted the introduction of Monterey pine (Pinus radiata) from California to Australia and New Zealand as a commercial timber crop. These examples represent only a small subsample of species that have been moved by humans for economic interests.

The rise in the use ofgenetically modified organisms has added another potential economic advantage to introducing new/modified species into different environments. Companies such asMonsanto that earn much of their profit through the selling of genetically modified seeds has added to the controversy surrounding introduced species. The effect of genetically modified organisms varies from organism to organism and is still being researched today, however, the rise of genetically modified organisms has added complexity to the conversations surrounding introduced species.

Human enjoyment
[edit]

Introductions have also been important in supporting recreation activities or otherwise increasing human enjoyment. Numerous fish andgame animals have been introduced for the purposes of sport fishing and hunting. The introduced amphibian (Ambystoma tigrinum) that threatens the endemic California salamander (A. californiense) was introduced to California as a source of bait for fishermen.[20]Pet animals have also been frequently transported into new areas by humans, and their escapes have resulted in several introductions, such as feralcats,[21]parrots,[22] andpond slider.[23]

Lophura nycthemera (silver pheasant), a native of East Asia, has been introduced into parts ofEurope for ornamental reasons.

Many plants have been introduced with the intent of aesthetically improving public recreation areas or private properties. The introducedNorway maple for example occupies a prominent status in many of Canada's parks.[24] The transport ofornamental plants forlandscaping use has and continues to be a source of many introductions. Some of these species have escaped horticultural control and become invasive. Notable examples includewater hyacinth,salt cedar, andpurple loosestrife.

In other cases, species have been translocated for reasons of "cultural nostalgia", which refers to instances in which humans who have migrated to new regions have intentionally brought with them familiar organisms. Famous examples include the introduction ofcommon starlings to North America by the AmericanEugene Schieffelin, a lover of the works of Shakespeare and the chairman of theAmerican Acclimatization Society, who, it is rumoured, wanted to introduce all of the birds mentioned in Shakespeare's plays into the United States. He deliberately released eighty starlings into Central Park in New York City in 1890, and another forty in 1891.

Yet another prominent example of an introduced species that became invasive is theEuropean rabbit in Australia.Thomas Austin, a British landowner, had rabbits released on his estate inVictoria because he missed hunting them. A more recent example is the introduction of thecommon wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) to North America by aCincinnati boy, George Rau, around 1950 after a family vacation toItaly.[25]

Addressing environmental problems
[edit]

Intentional introductions have also been undertaken with the aim of ameliorating environmental problems. A number of fast spreading plants such askudzu have been introduced as a means oferosion control. Other species have been introduced asbiological control agents to controlinvasive species. This involves the purposeful introduction of anatural enemy of the target species with the intention of reducing its numbers or controlling its spread.

A special case of introduction is the reintroduction of a species that has become locally endangered or extinct, done in the interests of conservation.[26] Examples of successful reintroductions include wolves toYellowstone National Park in the U.S., and thered kite to parts of England and Scotland. Introductions or translocations of species have also been proposed in the interest ofgenetic conservation, which advocates the introduction of new individuals into genetically depauperate populations of endangered or threatened species.[27]

Unintentional introductions

[edit]

Unintentional introductions occur when species are transported by human vectors. Increasing rates of human travel are providing accelerating opportunities for species to be accidentally transported into areas in which they are not considered native. For example, three species ofrat (the black, Norway and Polynesian) have spread to most of the world as hitchhikers on ships, andarachnids such asscorpions and exoticspiders are sometimes transported to areas far beyond their native range by riding in shipments of tropical fruit. This was seen during the introduction ofSteatoda nobilis (Noble false widow) worldwide throughbanana shipments.[28]

Further there are numerous examples of marine organisms being transported inballast water, among them the invasivecomb jellyMnemiopsis leidyi, the dangerous bacteriumVibrio cholerae, or the foulingzebra mussel. The Mediterranean and Black Seas, with their high volume shipping from exotic sources, are most impacted by this problem.[29] Busy harbors are all potential hotspots as well: over 200 species have been introduced to theSan Francisco Bay in this manner making it the most heavily invaded estuary in the world.[30]

There is also the accidental release of theAfricanized honey bees (AHB), known colloquially as "killer bees") orAfricanized bee to Brazil in 1957 and theAsian carp to the United States. The insect commonly known as thebrown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys) was introduced accidentally in Pennsylvania. Another form of unintentional introductions is when an intentionally introduced plant carries a parasite or herbivore with it. Some become invasive, for example, theoleander aphid, accidentally introduced with the ornamental plant,oleander.

Yet another unintentional pathway of introduction is during the delivery ofhumanitarian aid in the aftermath of natural disasters.[31][32] This occurred during relief efforts forHurricane Maria inDominica, it was found that thecommon green iguana, theCuban tree frog, and potentially theVenezuela snouted tree frog were introduced with the former two becoming established.[32]

Most accidentally or intentionally introduced species do not become invasive as the ones mentioned above. For instance, Some 179 coccinellid species have been introduced to the U.S. and Canada; about 27 of these non-native species have become established, and only a handful can be considered invasive, including the intentionally introducedHarmonia axyridis, multicoloredAsian lady beetle.[33] However the small percentage of introduced species that become invasive can produce profound ecological changes. In North America,Harmonia axyridis has become the most abundantlady beetle and probably accounts for more observations than all the nativelady beetles put together.[34]

Introduced plants

[edit]
Main article:Adventive plant
Aesculus hippocastanum, native toGreece and theBalkan peninsula, has been introduced across most ofEurope and parts ofNorth America as an ornamental plant.[35]

Many non-native plants have been introduced into new territories, initially as eitherornamental plants or forerosion control, stock feed, or forestry. Whether an exotic will become aninvasive species is seldom understood in the beginning.[36]

A very troublesome marine species in southern Europe is theseaweedCaulerpa taxifolia.Caulerpa was first observed in theMediterranean Sea in 1984, off the coast ofMonaco. By 1997, it had covered some 50 km2. It has a strong potential to overgrow naturalbiotopes, and represents a major risk for sublittoralecosystems. The origin of the alga in the Mediterranean was thought to be either as a migration through theSuez Canal from the Red Sea, or as an accidental introduction from an aquarium.[37]

This species has become invasive in Australia, where it threatens native rare plants and causes erosion and soil slumping around river banks.[38] It has also become invasive in France where it has been listed as an invasive plant species of concern in the Mediterranean region, where it can form monocultures that threaten critical conservation habitats.[39]

Introduced animals

[edit]
ChickensGallus gallus domesticus, from Asia, introduced in the rest of the world

Most introduced species do not become invasive. Examples of introduced animals that have become invasive include thegypsy moth in easternNorth America, thezebra mussel andalewife in theGreat Lakes, theCanada goose andgray squirrel in Europe, thebeaver inTierra del Fuego, themuskrat inEurope andAsia, thecane toad andred fox inAustralia,nutria inNorth America,Eurasia, andAfrica, and thecommon brushtail possum inNew Zealand. InTaiwan, the success of introduced bird species was related to their native range size and body size; larger species with larger native range sizes were found to have larger introduced range sizes.[40]

One notoriously devastating introduced species is the small Indian mongoose (Urva auropunctata). Originating in a region encompassingIran andIndia, it was introduced to theWest Indies andHawaii in the late 1800s for pest control. Since then, it has thrived on prey unequipped to deal with its speed, nearly leading to the local extinction of a variety of species.[41]

In some cases, introduced animals may unintentionally promote the cause ofrewilding.[42] For example, escapedhorses anddonkeys that have gone feral inthe Americas may play ecological roles similar to those of theequids that becameextinct there at the end of thePleistocene.[43]

The exotic pet trade has also been a large source of introduced species. The species favored as pets have more general habitat requirements and larger distributions.[44] Therefore, as these pets escape or are released, unintentionally or intentionally, they are more likely to survive and establish non-native populations in the wild. Among the popular exotic pets that have become alien or invasive species are parrots, frogs, terrapins, and iguanas.

Most commonly introduced species

[edit]

Some species, such as theWestern honey bee,brown rat,house sparrow,ring-necked pheasant, andEuropean starling, have been introduced very widely. In addition there are someagricultural andpet species that frequently becomeferal; these includerabbits,dogs,ducks,snakes,goats,fish,pigs, andcats. Manywater fleas such asDaphnia,Bosmina andBythotrephes have introduced around the world, causing dramatic changes in native freshwater ecosystems.[45]

Genetics

[edit]

When a new species is introduced, the species could potentially breed with members of native species, producing hybrids. The effect of the creating of hybrids can range from having little effect, a negative effect, to having devastating effects on native species. Potential negative effects include hybrids that are less fit for their environment resulting in a population decrease. This was seen in theAtlantic Salmon population when high levels of escape from Atlantic Salmon farms into the wild populations resulted in hybrids that had reduced survival.[46] Potential positive effects include adding to thegenetic diversity of the population which can increase theadaptation ability of the population and increase the number of healthy individuals within a population. This was seen in the introduction ofguppies inTrinidad to encouragepopulation growth and introduce newalleles into the population. The results of this introduction included increased levels ofheterozygosity and a largerpopulation size.[47] Wide-spread introductions of non-native iguanas are causing devastating effects on nativeIguana populations in theCaribbeanLesser Antilles, as hybrids appear to have higher fitness than native iguanas, leading to competitive outcompetition and replacement.[48][49] Numerous populations have already become extinct and hybridization continues to reduce the number of native iguanas on multiple islands.

In plants, introduced species have been observed to undergo rapid evolutionary change to adapt to their new environments, with changes in plant height, size, leaf shape, dispersal ability, reproductive output, vegetative reproduction ability, level of dependence on themycorrhizal network, and level of phenotype plasticity appearing on timescales of decades to centuries.[50]

On a planetary body

[edit]
Main article:Interplanetary contamination
[icon]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(May 2021)

It has been hypothesized thatinvasive species ofmicrobial life could contaminate aplanetary body after the former is introduced by aspace probe orspacecraft, either deliberately or unintentionally.[51] It has also been hypothesized that the origin of life on earth is due to introductions of life from other planets billions of years ago, possibly by a sentient race. Projects have been proposed to introduce life to other lifeless buthabitable planets in other star systems some time in the future. In preparation for this, projects have been proposed to see if anything is still alive from any of the feces left behind during the sixMoon landings from 1969 to 1972.[52]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Sax, Dov F.; Gaines, Steven D. (2008-08-12)."Species invasions and extinction: The future of native biodiversity on islands".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.105 (supplement_1):11490–11497.doi:10.1073/pnas.0802290105.ISSN 0027-8424.PMC 2556416.PMID 18695231.
  2. ^"Foreign Species Overview".U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Endangered Species.Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved28 May 2019.
  3. ^"Foreign Species".NOAA Fisheries.Archived from the original on 28 May 2019. Retrieved28 May 2019.
  4. ^"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mid-Atlantic Integrated Assessment. September 16, 2003. Introduced species". Archived fromthe original on 2020-05-29.
  5. ^"Glossary | Chesapeake Bay Program".www.chesapeakebay.net.Archived from the original on 2022-06-04. Retrieved2022-06-25.
  6. ^abCarlton, James T. (2002).Introduced Species in U.S. Coastal Waters: Environmental Impacts and Management Priorities (Report). Pew Oceans Commission.Archived from the original on 29 May 2019. Retrieved25 June 2022.
  7. ^Occhipinti-Ambrogi, Anna; Galil, Bella S. (November 2004)."A uniform terminology on bioinvasions: a chimera or an operative tool?"(PDF).Marine Pollution Bulletin.49 (9–10):688–694.Bibcode:2004MarPB..49..688O.doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.08.011.PMID 15530511.Archived(PDF) from the original on 29 January 2021. Retrieved27 December 2020.
  8. ^"Immigration, Extinction, and Island Equilibrium".Farnam Street. 2016-12-14.Archived from the original on 2021-06-11. Retrieved2021-06-11.
  9. ^Richardson, David M.; Pysek, Petr; Rejmanek, Marcel; Barbour, Michael G.; Panetta, F. Dane; West, Carol J. (2000)."Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions".Diversity and Distributions.6 (2):93–107.Bibcode:2000DivDi...6...93R.doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x.
  10. ^"IUCN SSC - Species Survival Commission".archive.ph. 2007-03-03. Archived fromthe original on 2007-03-03. Retrieved2021-06-11.
  11. ^Colautti, Robert I.; MacIsaac, Hugh J. (2004)."A neutral terminology to define 'invasive' species".Diversity and Distributions.10 (2):135–141.Bibcode:2004DivDi..10..135C.doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00061.x.S2CID 18971654.
  12. ^Exec. Order No. 13112 (February 3, 1999) President of the United States
  13. ^"Invasive Species Program. Clemson University – DPI". Archived fromthe original on 2010-05-30.
  14. ^Tobin, Patrick C. (2018-10-23).Managing invasive species (Report). F1000Research.
  15. ^"Can invasive species be beneficial for wildlife?".Extension. 2018-09-26.Archived from the original on 2022-12-13. Retrieved2022-12-13.
  16. ^Mehta, Kanishka; Koli, Vijay K.; Kittur, Swati; Sundar, K. S. Gopi (2024)."Can you nest where you roost? Waterbirds use different sites but similar cues to locate roosting and breeding sites in a small Indian city".Urban Ecosystems.27 (4):1279–1290.Bibcode:2024UrbEc..27.1279M.doi:10.1007/s11252-023-01454-5.
  17. ^Pimentel, David; Lach, Lori; Zuniga, Rodolfo; Morrison, Doug (2000-01-01)."Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States".BioScience.50 (1):53–65.doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0053:EAECON]2.3.CO;2.ISSN 0006-3568.S2CID 44703574.
  18. ^Johnson, Tim (9 November 2003)."Invasive Species".The Burlington Free Press. pp. 2D, 3D.Archived from the original on 17 August 2022. Retrieved25 June 2022.
  19. ^Naylor, R. L. (2001). "Aquaculture—A Gateway for Exotic Species".Science.294 (5547):1655–1656.doi:10.1126/science.1064875.PMID 11721035.S2CID 82810702.
  20. ^Riley, Seth P. D.; Shaffer, H. Bradley; Voss, S. Randal; Fitzpatrick, Benjamin M. (2003). "Hybridization Between a Rare, Native Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma Californiense) and its Introduced Congener".Ecological Applications.13 (5):1263–1275.Bibcode:2003EcoAp..13.1263R.doi:10.1890/02-5023.
  21. ^"Effects of an Invasive Species: Domestic Cats. The Wildlife society. Fact sheet"(PDF).
  22. ^Calzada Preston, Carlos E.; Pruett-Jones, Stephen (2021)."The Number and Distribution of Introduced and Naturalized Parrots".Diversity.13 (9): 412.Bibcode:2021Diver..13..412C.doi:10.3390/d13090412.
  23. ^Reshetnikov, Andrey N. (2023-01-24)."Rarely naturalized, but widespread and even invasive: the paradox of a popular pet terrapin expansion in Eurasia".NeoBiota.81 (1):91–127.doi:10.3897/neobiota.81.90473.
  24. ^Foster, Jennifer; Sandberg, L. Anders (2004). "Friends or Foe? Invasive Species and Public Green Space in Toronto".Geographical Review.94 (2):178–198.Bibcode:2004GeoRv..94..178F.doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00166.x.S2CID 161635259.
  25. ^Deichsel, Guntram; Gist, Daniel H."On the Origin of the Common Wall Lizards Podarcis muralis (Reptilia: Lacertidae) in Cincinnati, Ohio".www.lacerta.de. Retrieved2023-07-22.
  26. ^Shirey, Patrick D.; Lamberti, Gary A. (2010)."Assisted colonization under the U.S. Endangered Species Act".Conservation Letters.3 (1):45–52.Bibcode:2010ConL....3...45S.doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00083.x.
  27. ^Moritz, Craig (2004). "Conservation Units and Translocations: Strategies for Conserving Evolutionary Processes".Hereditas.130 (3):217–228.doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1999.00217.x.
  28. ^C.M.Z.S, Rev O. P. Cambridge M. A. (1879-09-01)."XXIV.—On some new and rare British Spiders, with characters of a new genus".Annals and Magazine of Natural History.4 (21):190–215.doi:10.1080/00222937908679818.ISSN 0374-5481.
  29. ^Briand, Frederic; Galil, Bella (November 2002)."Alien marine organisms introduced by ships - An overview".CIESM Workshop Monographs.20.
  30. ^Cohen, A. N.; Carlton, James T. (1998). "Accelerating Invasion Rate in a Highly Invaded Estuary".Science.279 (5350):555–558.Bibcode:1998Sci...279..555C.doi:10.1126/science.279.5350.555.PMID 9438847.S2CID 7874731.
  31. ^van den Burg, Matthijs P.; Daltry, Jennifer C.; Angin, Baptiste; Boman, Erik; Brisbane, Jeanelle L. K.; Collins, Katrina; Haakonsson, Jane E.; Hill, Arica; Horrocks, Julia A.; Mukhida, Farah; Providence, FitzGerald; Questel, Karl; Ramnanan, Naitram; Steele, Sophia; Vique Bosquet, Isabel M.; Knapp, Charles R. (7 May 2021). "Biosecurity for humanitarian aid".Science.372 (6542):581–582.Bibcode:2021Sci...372..581V.doi:10.1126/science.abj0449.eISSN 1095-9203.ISSN 0036-8075.PMID 33958467.S2CID 233872896.
  32. ^abvan den Burg, Matthijs P.; Brisbane, Jeanelle L. K.; Knapp, Charles R. (14 October 2019). "Post-hurricane relief facilitates invasion and establishment of two invasive alien vertebrate species in the Commonwealth of Dominica, West Indies".Biological Invasions.22 (2):195–203.doi:10.1007/s10530-019-02107-5.eISSN 1573-1464.ISSN 1387-3547.S2CID 204460134.
  33. ^Gordon, R. D.; Vandenberg, N. (1991),"Field guide to recently introduced species of coccinellidae (Coleoptera) in North America, with a revised key to north American genera of coccinellini",Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington,93:845–867,archived from the original on 2017-05-25, retrieved2017-05-10
  34. ^"Summary by Species".Lost Ladybug Project.Archived from the original on 2017-05-03.
  35. ^Trust, Woodland."Horse Chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum)".Woodland Trust.Archived from the original on 2021-11-03. Retrieved2021-04-14.
  36. ^Dong, Bi-Cheng; Yang, Qiang; Kinlock, Nicole L.; Pouteau, Robin; Pyšek, Petr; Weigelt, Patrick; Yu, Fei-Hai; van Kleunen, Mark (April 2024)."Naturalization of introduced plants is driven by life-form-dependent cultivation biases".Diversity and Distributions.30 (1):55–70.Bibcode:2024DivDi..30...55D.doi:10.1111/ddi.13788.ISSN 1366-9516.
  37. ^Kennedy, Kathryn (1992).A systematic study of the genus Phyla Lour. (Verbenaceae: Verbenoideae, Lantanae) (Thesis). The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved2023-07-23.
  38. ^Whalley, R. D. B.; Price, J. N.; Macdonald, M. J.; Berney, P. J. (2011). "Drivers of change in the Social-Ecological Systems of the Gwydir Wetlands and Macquarie Marshes in northern New South Wales, Australia".The Rangeland Journal.33 (2): 109.doi:10.1071/rj11002.
  39. ^Olivier, Louis; Galland, Jean-Paul; Maurin, Hervé (1995).Livre rouge de la flore menacée de France(PDF). Collection Patrimoines naturels. Vol. 1. Muséum national d'histoire naturelle. Paris: Muséum national d'histoire naturelle Conservatoire botanique national de Porquerolles Ministère de l'environnement.ISBN 978-2-86515-092-2.
  40. ^Su, S.; Cassey, P.; Dyer, E. E.; Blackburn, T. M. (2017). "Geographical range expansion of alien birds and environmental matching".Ibis.159 (1):193–203.doi:10.1111/ibi.12418.hdl:10019.1/121016.
  41. ^Lowe, Sarah (2000). "00 of the world's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database".Auckland: Invasive Species Specialist Group.12: 10.
  42. ^Lundgren, E.J.; Ramp, D.; Rowan, J.; Middleton, O.; Schowanek, S.D.; Sanisidro, O.; Carroll, S.P.; Davis, M.; Sandom, C.J.; Svenning, J.-C.; Wallach, A.D. (2020)."Introduced herbivores restore Late Pleistocene ecological functions".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.117 (14):7871–7878.Bibcode:2020PNAS..117.7871L.doi:10.1073/pnas.1915769117.PMC 7148574.PMID 32205427.S2CID 214627869.
  43. ^Rowan, J. (2020)."Pablo Escobar's hippos may help counteract a legacy of extinctions".U. Mass. Amherst.Archived from the original on 2020-03-28. Retrieved2020-04-01.
  44. ^Gippet, JMW; Bertelsmeier, C (2021)."Invasiveness is linked to greater commercial success in the global pet trade".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.118 (14):1–6.Bibcode:2021PNAS..11816337G.doi:10.1073/pnas.2016337118.PMC 8040636.PMID 33753557.
  45. ^Kotov, Alexey A.; Karabanov, Dmitry P.; Van Damme, Kay (2022-09-09)."Non-Indigenous Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda): From a Few Notorious Cases to a Potential Global Faunal Mixing in Aquatic Ecosystems".Water.14 (18): 2806.Bibcode:2022Water..14.2806K.doi:10.3390/w14182806.ISSN 2073-4441.
  46. ^McGinnity, Philip; Prodöhl, Paulo; Ferguson, Andy; Hynes, Rosaleen; Maoiléidigh, Niall ó; Baker, Natalie; Cotter, Deirdre; O'Hea, Brendan; Cooke, Declan (2003-12-07)."Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon".Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences.270 (1532):2443–2450.doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2520.ISSN 0962-8452.PMC 1691531.PMID 14667333.
  47. ^Fitzpatrick, Sarah W.; Gerberich, Jill C.; Angeloni, Lisa M.; Bailey, Larissa L.; Broder, Emily D.; Torres-Dowdall, Julian; Handelsman, Corey A.; López-Sepulcre, Andrés; Reznick, David N. (2016-08-01)."Gene flow from an adaptively divergent source causes rescue through genetic and demographic factors in two wild populations of Trinidadian guppies".Evolutionary Applications.9 (7):879–891.Bibcode:2016EvApp...9..879F.doi:10.1111/eva.12356.ISSN 1752-4571.PMC 4947150.PMID 27468306.
  48. ^Knapp, Charles R.; Grant, Tandora D.; Pasachnik, Stesha A.; Angin, Baptiste; Boman, Erik; Brisbane, Jeanelle; Buckner, Sandra D.; Haakonsson, Jane E.; Harlow, Peter S.; Mukhida, Farah; Thomas-Moko, Nunia; Burg, Matthijs P.; Wasilewski, Joseph A. (6 November 2020)."The global need to address threats from invasive alien iguanas".Animal Conservation.24 (5):717–719.doi:10.1111/acv.12660.eISSN 1469-1795.ISSN 1367-9430.S2CID 228838378.
  49. ^Vuillaume, Barbara; Valette, Victorien; Lepais, Olivier; Grandjean, Frédéric; Breuil, Michel (5 June 2015)."Genetic Evidence of Hybridization between the Endangered Native Species Iguana delicatissima and the Invasive Iguana iguana (Reptilia, Iguanidae) in the Lesser Antilles: Management Implications".PLOS ONE.10 (6): e0127575.Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1027575V.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127575.eISSN 1932-6203.PMC 4457794.PMID 26046351.
  50. ^Buswell, Joanna;Moles, Angela; Hartley, Stephen (2010). "Is rapid evolution common in introduced plant species?".Journal of Ecology.99 (1):214–224.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01759.x.S2CID 84013042.
  51. ^"Assessment of Planetary Protection and Contamination Control Technologies for Future Planetary Science Missions"(PDF). Jet Propulsion Laboratory. January 24, 2011. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2014-03-19.
    3.1.1 Microbial Reduction Methodologies:

    "This protocol was defined in concert with Viking, the first mission to face the most stringent planetary protection requirements; its implementation remains the gold standard today."

  52. ^Lupisella, M.; Bleacher, J.; Lewis, R.; Dworkin, J.; Wright, M.; Burton, A.; Rubins, K.; Wallace, S.; Stahl, S.; John, K.; Archer, D.; Niles, P.; Regberg, A.; Smith, D.; Race, M. (2018-02-01)."Low-Latency Telerobotic Sample Return and Biomolecular Sequencing for Deep Space Gateway".Deep Space Gateway Concept Science Workshop.2063: 3032.Bibcode:2018LPICo2063.3032L.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Chris D. Thomas (2017).Inheritors of the Earth: How Nature Is Thriving in an Age of Extinction. PublicAffairs.ISBN 978-1610397278.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toIntroduced species.
General
Producers
Consumers
Decomposers
Microorganisms
Food webs
Example webs
Processes
Defense,
counter
Ecology:Modelling ecosystems: Other components
Population
ecology
Species
Species
interaction
Spatial
ecology
Niche
Other
networks
Other
Air
Biological
Digital
Electromagnetic
Natural
Noise
Radiation
Soil
Solid waste
Space
Visual
War
Water
Topics
Misc
Responses
Lists
National
Other
Portals:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Introduced_species&oldid=1273242997"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp