| Exocet | |
|---|---|
 AM39 under aDassault Rafale | |
| Type | Anti-ship missile |
| Place of origin | France |
| Service history | |
| In service | 1975[1]–present |
| Used by | Seeoperators |
| Wars | Iran–Iraq War Falklands War |
| Production history | |
| Designer | 1967–1970:Nord Aviation 1970–1974:Aérospatiale |
| Designed | 1967 |
| Manufacturer | 1979–1999:Aérospatiale 1999–2001:Aérospatiale-Matra 2001–present:MBDA France |
| Produced | 1974 |
| Specifications | |
| Mass | 780 kg (1,720 lb) |
| Length | 6 m (19 ft 8 in) |
| Diameter | 34.8 cm (1 ft 1.7 in) |
| Wingspan | 1.35 m (4 ft 5 in) |
| Warhead | 165 kg (364 lb) |
| Engine | Solid propellant engine Turbojet (MM40 Block 3 version) |
Operational range | |
| Flight altitude | Sea-skimming |
| Maximum speed | Mach 0.93 1,148 km/h (713 mph; 620 kn) |
Guidance system | Inertial guidance,active radar homing, andGPS guidance |
Launch platform | multi-platform:
|
TheExocet (French pronunciation:[ɛɡzɔsɛ]) is a French-builtanti-ship missile whose various versions can be launched fromsurface vessels,submarines,helicopters andfixed-wing aircraft.
The missile's name was given by M. Guillot, then the technical director atNord Aviation.[7] It is the French word forflying fish, from theLatinexocoetus, a transliteration of theGreek name for the fish that sometimes flew into a boat:ἐξώκοιτος (exōkoitos), literally "lying down outside (ἒξω,κεῖμαι), sleeping outside".[8]
The Exocet is built byMBDA, a European missile company. Development began in 1967 by Nord as a ship-launched weapon named the MM38. A few years later,Aerospatiale and Nord merged. The basic body design was based on theNord AS-30 air-to-ground tactical missile. The sea-launched MM38 entered service in 1975,[1] whilst the air-launched AM39 Exocet began development in 1974 and entered service with theFrench Navy five years later in 1979.[9]
The relatively compact missile is designed for attacking small- to medium-sizewarships (e.g.,frigates,corvettes, anddestroyers), although multiple hits are effective against larger vessels, such as aircraft carriers.[10] It is guidedinertially in mid-flight and turns onactive radar homing late in its flight to find and hit its target. As a countermeasure against air defence around the target, it maintains a very low altitude while inbound, staying just one to two meters above the sea surface. Due to the effect of theradar horizon, this means that the target may not detect an incoming attack until the missile is only 6,000 metres (3.7 mi) from impact. This leaves little time for reaction and stimulated the design ofclose-in weapon systems (CIWS).[citation needed]
Its solid propellantrocket motor gives the Exocet a maximum range of 70 kilometres (43 mi; 38 nmi). It was replaced on the Block 3 MM40 ship-launched version of the missile with a solid-propellantbooster and a turbojetsustainer engine which extends the range of the missile to more than 180 kilometres (110 mi; 97 nmi). The submarine-launched version places the missile inside alaunch capsule.[4]
ReplacementFuture Cruise/Anti-Ship Weapon is under development.
The Exocet has been manufactured in versions including:
In February 2004, theDirection Générale pour l'Armement (DGA) notified MBDA of a contract for the design and production of a new missile, the MM40 Block 3. It has an improved range, in excess of 180 kilometres (97 nautical miles) – through the use of aMicroturbo TRI-40turbojet engine, and includes four air intakes to provide continuous airflow to the power plant during high-G manoeuvres.[citation needed]
The Block 3 missile acceptsGPS guidance system waypoint commands, which allow it to attack naval targets from different angles and to strike land targets, giving it a marginal role as aland-attack missile. The Block 3 Exocet is lighter than the previous MM40 Block 2 Exocet.[14]
45 Block 3 Exocets were ordered by the French Navy in December 2008 for its ships which were carrying Block 2 missiles, namelyHorizon-class andAquitaine-class frigates. From 2021, the Block 3 upgrade was also being extended to three of theLa Fayette-class frigates selected for life extension refits.[15] These are not to be new productions but the conversion of older Block 2 missiles to the Block 3 standard. An MM40 Block 3 last qualification firing took place on theÎle du Levant test range on 25 April 2007 and series manufacturing began in October 2008. The first firing of the Block 3 from a warship took place on 18 March 2010, from the French Navy air defence frigateChevalier Paul. In 2012, a new motor, designed and manufactured in Brazil by the Avibras company in collaboration with MBDA, was tested on an MM40 missile of theBrazilian Navy.[citation needed]
Besides the French, the Block 3 has been ordered by several other navies including that of Greece, theUAE, Chile,[16] Peru,[17] Qatar, Oman, Indonesia and Morocco.[18]
The chief competitors to the Exocet are the US-madeHarpoon, the TurkishAtmaca, the ItalianOtomat, IsraelGabriel-V, the SwedishRBS 15 and the ChineseYingji series.[citation needed]
The “Block 3c” variant integrates a digital Radio Frequency (RF) seeker to the missile that has been developed by Thales. The Block 3c variant is described as more resistant to jamming systems and may be able to recognize surface vessels, based on the use of advanced wave forms. Block 3 missiles introduced a longer 200 kilometer range but retained the same RF seeker as Block 2. This technology remained non-digital.[19]
The Block 3c variant is to begin delivery to the French Navy in December 2022 with 55 new missiles ordered in addition to 45 “MM40 Block 3c kits” to update existing Block 3 missiles to the Block 3c configuration.[19] In September 2023, tests of the missile conducted by thefrigateAlsace confirmed the variant as ready for operational service.[20][21]
In 1982, during theFalklands War,Argentine NavyDassault-Breguet Super Étendard warplanes carrying the AM39 air-launched version of the Exocet caused damage which sank theRoyal Navy destroyerHMS Sheffield on 4 May 1982. Two more Exocets struck the 15,000-ton merchant shipAtlantic Conveyor on 25 May. Two MM38 ship-to-ship missiles were removed from thedestroyerARASeguí, a formerUS NavyAllen M. Sumner-class destroyer, and transferred to an improvised launcher for land use.[22] The missiles were launched on 12 June 1982 and one hit the destroyerHMS Glamorgan.
Sheffield was aType 42guided missile destroyer. On 4 May 1982, Sheffield was at defence watches (second-degree readiness) the southernmost of three Type 42 destroyers when she was hit by one of two AM39 air-launched Exocet missiles fired by Argentine Super Étendardstrike fighters. The second missile splashed into the sea about half-mile off herport beam.[23]
The missile that struckSheffield impacted on the starboard side at deck level 2, travelling through the junior ratings' scullery and breaching the Forward Auxiliary Machinery Room/Forward Engine Room bulkhead 2.4 metres (7 ft 10 in) above the waterline, creating a hole in the hull roughly 1.2 by 3 m (4 by 10 ft). It appears that the warhead did not explode.[24] Twenty members of her crew were killed and 26 injured. The ship foundered while under tow on 10 May. The loss ofSheffield was a deep shock to the British public and government.
The official Royal Navy Board of Inquiry Report stated that evidence indicates that the warhead did not detonate. During the four and a half days that the ship remained afloat, five salvage inspections were made and a number of photographs were taken. Members of the crew were interviewed and testimony was given by Exocet specialists (the Royal Navy had 15 surface combat ships armed with Exocets in the Falklands War). There was no evidence of an explosion, although burning propellant from the rocket motor caused fires which could not be checked as firefighting equipment had been put out of action.
Atlantic Conveyor was a 14,950 tonroll-on/roll-offcontainer ship that had been hastily converted to carry aircraft on her deck. She was carrying helicopters and supplies, including cluster bombs.[25] Two Exocet missiles had been fired at a frigate, but had been confused by its defences and re-targeted theAtlantic Conveyor. Both missiles struck the container ship on her port quarter and warheads exploded either after penetrating the ship's hull,[26] or on impact.[27] WitnessPrince Andrew reported that debris caused "splashes in the water about a quarter of a mile away".[28] Twelve men were killed and the survivors were taken to HMSHermes.Atlantic Conveyor sank while under tow three days later.
On 30 May, two Super Étendards, one carrying Argentina's last remaining air-launched Exocet, escorted by fourDouglas A-4C Skyhawks, each with two 500 lb bombs, took off to attack the carrierHMSInvincible.[29] Argentine intelligence had sought to determine the position ofInvincible from analysis of aircraft flight routes from the task force to the islands.[29] However, the British had a standing order that all aircraft conduct a low level transit when leaving or returning to the ship to disguise her position.[30] This tactic compromised the Argentine attack, which focused on a group of escorts 40 miles south of the main body of ships.[31] Two of the attacking Skyhawks were shot down: one by aSea Dart missile fired byHMSExeter,[31][29] and while the fate of the Exocet has never been established beyond doubt, the crew of HMSAvenger claimed that their 4.5-inch gun had shot it down.[32] No damage was caused to any British vessels.[29]
HMS Glamorgan was aCounty-class destroyer launched in 1964. On 12 June 1982 an MM38 Exocet missile was fired from an improvised shore-based launcher as she was steaming at about 20 knots (37 km/h) 18 nautical miles (33 km) offshore. The first attempt to fire a missile did not result in a launch; on the second attempt, a missile was launched but did not acquire the target. The third attempt resulted in a missile trackingGlamorgan. The incoming Exocet missile was also spotted onGlamorgan[33] and a turn was ordered to present the stern to the missile.
The turn prevented the missile from striking the ship's side and penetrating the hull; instead, it hit the deckcoaming at an angle, near the portSeacat missile launcher, skidded along the deck and exploded, making a 10 ft × 15 ft (3 m × 5 m) hole in the hangar deck and a 5 ft × 4 ft (1.5 m × 1.2 m) hole in the galley below.[33] The blast travelled forwards and down, and the missile body, still travelling forwards, penetrated the hangar door, causing the ship's fuelled and armedWestland Wessex HAS.3 helicopter (XM837) to explode and start a severe fire in the hangar.[34] Fourteen crew members were killed.[35][36]
In the years after the Falklands War, it was revealed that the British government and theSecret Intelligence Service (MI6) had been extremely concerned at the time by the perceived inadequacy of the Royal Navy's anti-missile defences against the Exocet and the missile's potential to tip the naval war decisively in favour of the Argentine forces. A scenario was envisioned in which one or both of the force's two aircraft carriers (Invincible andHermes) were destroyed or incapacitated by Exocet attacks, which would make recapturing the Falklands much more difficult.[citation needed]
Actions were taken to contain the Exocet threat. A major intelligence operation was initiated to prevent the Argentine Navy from acquiring more of the weapons on the international market.[37] The operation included British intelligence agents claiming to be arms dealers able to supply large numbers of Exocets to Argentina, who diverted Argentina from pursuing sources which could genuinely supply a few missiles. France denied deliveries of Exocet AM39s purchased by Peru to avoid the possibility that Peru might supply them to Argentina because they[clarification needed] knew that payment would be made with credit from theCentral Bank of Peru. British intelligence had detected the guarantee was a deposit of two hundred million dollars from the Andean Lima Bank, an owned subsidiary of the ItalianBanco Ambrosiano.[38][39]
Exocet missiles were used byIraq mainly as part of theTanker War, theAérospatiale SA 321 Super Frelon,Dassault-Breguet Super Étendard andDassault Mirage F1 were aircraft used by Iraq to launch the missiles.[40][41]
During theIran–Iraq War, on 17 May 1987, anIraqi aircraft identified as a Mirage F1[42] (but was in fact a modifiedDassault Falcon 50) fired two Exocet missiles at the AmericanfrigateUSS Stark. Both missiles struck theport side of the ship near the bridge. No weapons were fired in defence: ThePhalanx CIWS remained in standby mode and theMark 36 SRBOC countermeasures were not armed. Thirty-seven United States Navy personnel were killed and twenty-one were wounded.[43] The ship did not sink, and was eventually repaired.[44]
 | This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(October 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Argentina
Brunei
Bulgaria
Brazil
Cameroon
Chile
Colombia
Cyprus
Ecuador: MM40
Egypt: AM39,[45] MM38 & MM40
France
Germany
Greece
Indonesia
India
Kuwait
Libya
Malaysia
Morocco
Oman
Pakistan
Peru
Qatar
South Africa:South African Navy – MM40 Block 2 onValour-class frigates.[49] The navy plans to upgrade to the Block 3 missile.[50]
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
Uruguay
Belgium
Georgia
Iraq
United Kingdom
Venezuela
South Korea
