Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Exclusion Bill Parliament

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Parliaments of England
Predecessors
  Witenagemot 7th – 11th centuries
  Curia regis 1066 –c. 1215
  1st 1237
  2nd 1242
  3rd 1244
  4th 1246
  3rd 1247
  4th 1248
  Unnumbered 1251
  5th 1252
  6th 1253
  7th 1254
  8th 1255
  9th 1255
  10th 1258
  11th 1258
  12th 1258
  13th "Oxford/Mad" 1258
  14th 1259
  15th 1259
  16th 1259
  17th 1260
  18th 1260
  19th 1260
  20th 1261
  21st 1262
  22nd 1262
  23rd 1263
  24th 1263
  25th 1264
  26th "Simon de Montfort" 1265
  27th 1265
  28th 1265
  29th 1266
  30th 1267
  31st 1267
  32nd 1268
  33rd 1268
  34th 1268
  35th 1269
  36th 1269
  37th 1270
  38th 1272
  "Model" 1295
  "Good" 1376
  "Bad" 1377
  "Bats" 1426
  "Devils" 1459
  "Reformation" 1529–1536
  1st 1553
  2nd 1554
  3rd 1554–1555
  4th 1555
  5th 1558
  1st 1559
  2nd 1563–1567
  3rd 1571
  4th 1572–1583
  5th 1584–1585
  6th 1586–1587
  7th 1589
  8th1593
  9th1597–1598
  10th1601

List of parliaments of EnglandList of acts of the Parliament of EnglandParliaments of Great Britain

"The Solemn MockProcession of the Pope,Cardinals,Jesuits,Friars, etc. through theCity of London, 17 November 1679."
Book of the 1680 Westminster House of Commons debates

TheExclusion Bill Parliament was aParliament of England during the reign ofCharles II of England, named after the long saga of theExclusion Bill. Summoned on 24 July 1679, but prorogued by the king so that it did not assemble until 21 October 1680, it was dissolved three months later on 18 January 1680/81.

Background

[edit]

Succeeding the longCavalier Parliament and the short-livedHabeas Corpus Parliament of March to July 1679, this was the third parliament of the King's reign. Its character was much influenced by the aftermath of thePopish Plot crisis.

On 15 May 1679, the supporters ofAnthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, had introduced theExclusion Bill into theCommons with the aim of excluding the king's brother,James, Duke of York, from thesuccession to the throne. A fringe group began to support the claim of Charles's illegitimate son, theDuke of Monmouth. As it seemed likely that the bill would pass, Charles exercised hisRoyal prerogative to dissolve Parliament.[1][2]

History

[edit]

A new parliament was summoned on 24 July 1679, and elections to the newHouse of Commons were held on various dates in the weeks which followed, but in general they went badly for the court party. With parliament expected to meet in October 1679, King Charles prorogued the parliament until 26 January 1680.[3] Shaftesbury was anxious that the king might be intending not to meet this new parliament, so he launched a petitioning campaign to pressure the king to do so. He also wrote to theDuke of Monmouth, advising him to return from exile, and on 27 November 1679 Monmouth entered London amid scenes of widespread celebration. On 7 December 1679, a petition signed by Shaftesbury and fifteen other Whig peers called on Charles to meet parliament, and this was followed on 13 January 1679/80 by a similar petition of 20,000 signatures. However, instead of meeting parliament Charles further prorogued it and recalled his brother the Duke of York from Scotland. With this, Shaftesbury urged his friends on thePrivy Council to resign, and four did so.[3]

This agitation was opposed byGeorge Jeffreys andFrancis Wythens, who presented addresses expressingabhorrence of thepetitioners, thus initiating the movement of theAbhorrers, who supported the actions of the king.Roger North noted that "The frolic went all over England", and the addresses of the Abhorrers from around the country formed a counterblast to those of the Petitioners.

Shaftesbury's party sought to establish a mass movement to keep alive the fears raised by thePopish Plot, organising huge processions in London in which the Pope was burnt in effigy. The King's supporters mustered their own propaganda in the form of memoirs of theCommonwealth government ofOliver Cromwell and its austerities. The King labelled the Whigs as subversives andnonconformists, and by early 1681 Shaftesbury's mass movement had died down.

Throughout the life of the parliament the supporters of Shaftesbury, becoming known as theWhigs, continued in their attempts to promote and pass theExclusion Bill, and Charles had little doubt that it would pass the House of Commons, if not the Lords. The natural supporters of the king and his brother in the parliament were theHighAnglicans, who as a political faction opposing the Exclusion Bill were known first as the Abhorrers, later as theTories.[4]

On 24 March 1680, Shaftesbury told the Privy Council he had received news that the Roman Catholics of Ireland were about to launch a rebellion, backed by the French. Several Privy Councillors, includingHenry Coventry, thought Shaftesbury was making this story up to inflame public opinion, so an investigation was launched. This ultimately resulted in the execution ofOliver Plunkett, Roman CatholicArchbishop of Armagh, on spurious charges.[3]

On 26 June 1680, Shaftesbury led a group of fifteen peers and commoners who presented an indictment to theMiddlesexgrand jury inWestminster Hall, charging the Duke of York with being a popishrecusant, in violation of the penal laws. Before the grand jury could act, it was dismissed for interfering in matters of state. The next week, Shaftesbury again tried to indict the Duke of York, but again the grand jury was dismissed before it could take any action.[3]

Parliament finally met on 21 October 1680, when the Commons elected for the first timeWilliam Williams asSpeaker. He became the first Speaker of the House of Commons fromWales.

On 23 October, Shaftesbury in theHouse of Lords called for a committee to be set up to investigate thePopish Plot. The Exclusion Bill, which as widely foreseen had been passed by the Commons, came before the Lords on 15 November, when Shaftesbury gave an impassioned speech in favour of it, but the Lords rejected the Bill by 63 votes to 30. The Lords now wished to explore alternative ways of limiting the powers of a Roman Catholic successor to the throne, but Shaftesbury argued that the only viable alternative to exclusion was calling on the king to marry again and provide a new heir. On 23 December 1680, Shaftesbury gave another strong pro-Exclusion speech in the Lords, in the course of which he attacked the Duke of York, stated his mistrust of Charles II, and urged parliament not to approve any further taxes until "the King shall satisfie the People, that what we give is not to make us Slaves and Papists". With parliament pursuing the Irish investigation vigorously and threatening toimpeach some of the king's judges, Charles prorogued parliament on 10 January 1680/81, and then dissolved it on 18 January, calling for fresh elections for a new Commons, intending the next parliament to meet atOxford. On 25 January, Shaftesbury, Essex, and Salisbury presented the king with a petition signed by sixteen peers asking that parliament should be held atWestminster Hall rather than Oxford, but the king remained committed to his intention.[3]

The next parliament was theOxford Parliament of 1681.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Dates of ParliamentsArchived 6 October 2008 at theWayback Machine at adam-matthew-publications.co.uk
  2. ^Joseph Robson Tanner,English Constitutional Conflicts of the Seventeenth Century (1928),p. viii online
  3. ^abcdeTim Harris, 'Cooper, Anthony Ashley', inOxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004–2007,doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/6208
  4. ^Clement Boulton Roylance Kent,The early history of the Tories: from the accession of Charles the Second to the death of William the Third (1660–1702) (1908), pp. 258–264
History
Royal Houses
Military
Geography
Demographics
Culture
Architecture
Symbols
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Exclusion_Bill_Parliament&oldid=1291304613"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp