Twenty-six countries participated in the contest, beating the record of twenty-five first set in1993. It saw the return ofIceland,Ireland, theNetherlands,Norway, andPoland after having been relegated from competing the previous year.Portugal also returned to the contest after being absent the previous year, whileUkraine participated in the contest for the first time.[2]Denmark,Finland,Lithuania,Macedonia, andSwitzerland were relegated due to their poor results in 2002.
The winner wasTurkey with the song "Everyway That I Can", performed bySertab Erener who wrote it withDemir Demirkan. This was Turkey's first victory in the contest after 28 years of participation.Belgium,Russia,Norway, andSweden rounded out the top five. Further down the table, theUnited Kingdom achieved their worst result to date, finishing twenty-sixth (last place) withno points. However, they avoided relegation due to being one of the "Big Four" countries at the time.[3] The host country Latvia placed twenty-fourth (third from last) – this was the first time since1995 that the host entry did not place in the top 10, and it was, overall, the worst result for a host entry since1992.
This was the last contest to take place on one evening. The EBU revealed that it would be adding a semi-final show to the competition in order to accommodate the growing number of interested countries wishing to take part in the contest.[4] This was also the last contest in which a relegation system was used to determine which countries would participate in the following year's contest. As the Belgian entry was sung in an imaginary language, this was also the first time the contest featured a song with no parts performed in English or a language native to the country.
Skonto Hall, Riga – host venue of the 2003 contest.
On 22 August 2002, Latvian public broadcasterLatvijas Televīzija (LTV) announced that it had chosen theSkonto Hall inRiga as the host venue for the 2003 contest.
Latvia won theEurovision Song Contest 2002 on 25 May 2002 inTallinn, Estonia, with the song “I Wanna” performed byMarie N. This was Latvia's first victory in the contest, which also carried the right for LTV to organise the 2003 contest. LTV initially had budgetary concerns with staging the contest. The chairman of the National Radio and Television Council Ojārs Rubenis stated that if the government presented no budget guarantees, the council, which owns shares in LTV, would vote against organising the contest. Rubenis elaborated that LTV was prepared to cover the creative side and broadcasting of the contest, but additional funds would be needed for infrastructure, hotels and other financial issues.
TheGovernment of Latvia allotted€5.3 million for the event with a further €1.1 million being provided by the Riga City Council – covering the anticipated organisational costs for the contest.[5] A task force that included members from LTV, the National Radio and Television Council, and state secretaries was formed to explicitly work on organisation of the contest and report on the estimated expenses.
Locations of the candidate cities: the chosen host city is marked in blue, while the eliminated cities are marked in red.
Three cities were considered as host city of the contest:Riga,Ventspils, andJūrmala.[6] LTV requested proposals from the three cities concerning how they plan to organise the contest. Riga City Council offered theMežaparks Open-air Stage,Skonto Hall, and the Ķīpsala International Exhibition Centre as potential venues for hosting the contest. Ventspils bid to host the contest at theVentspils Olympic Centre with a pledge of support from city mayorAivars Lembergs, who added that Ventspils could also provide two cruise ferries that could be used to accommodate up to 8,000 guests.[7] Jūrmala City Council offered the Dzintari Concert Hall with plans to expand and upgrade the facility and surrounding infrastructure.[6]
LTV's organisational task force later decided to proceed with the bids from Riga and Ventspils, eliminating Jūrmala and the Mežaparks Open-air Stage in Riga. On 15 June 2002, theEuropean Broadcasting Union (EBU) Reference Group decided in conjunction with the organisational task force in Latvia that Riga would host the 2003 contest with the venue option between the Skonto Hall and Ķīpsala International Exhibition Centre being decided upon by LTV.[8] LTV ultimately chose the Skonto Hall as the venue to stage the contest.
This section contains numerous links to pages onforeign language Wikipedias. They are shown asred links with the language codes in [small blue letters] in brackets. Click on the language code to see the page in that language.
Eurovision Song Contest 2003 – Participation summaries by country
Per the rules of the contest, twenty-six countries were allowed to participate in the event, a new record number of competing entries in a single edition.[9][10] Originally a total of twenty-five countries were scheduled to participate in the event, howeverUkraine was added to the line-up shortly before the publication of the competing countries in November 2002, making its début appearance in the contest.[10][11]Iceland,Ireland, theNetherlands,Norway,Poland, andPortugal returned after being absent from the previous year's event, and competed alongside Ukraine, the "Big Four" largest contributing participating countries – France,Germany,Spain, and theUnited Kingdom – and the remaining fifteen highest-scoring participating countries from the2002 contest.[12][13] Having received the lowest scores in the 2002 contest,Denmark,[14]Finland,[15]Lithuania,[16]Macedonia,[17] andSwitzerland[18] were subsequentlyrelegated and were prevented from participating in this year's event.[9]
Twenty-four countries participated in the 2002 contest inTallinn; of these, fourteen were expected to compete in 2003. The bottom ten in Tallinn would be relegated, to allow countries to compete for the first time.[19] In reality, only five countries were relegated – nineteen countries that entered in 2002 competed in Riga.[20] Originally,Serbia and Montenegro,Albania, andBelarus had planned 2003 debuts, but the EBU's late changes to the relegation procedure meant that they could not compete.[21] The countries eventually made their debuts in 2004.
The 2003 contest was one of the few editions where no lead artists had previously competed as lead artists in past contests, although Slovenian representativeKarmen had previously performed as a backing singer toVili Resnik forSlovenia in 1998.[22]
The EBU released the rules for the 2003 contest in November 2002, which detailed that twenty-six countries would participate, making it the largest number of participants to take part in the contest up to this point.[9] The rules also modified the eligibility criteria for entries, changing the date of release cut-off point for songs from 1 January 2003 to 1 October 2002. There was also a change in the tie-break rule, which would now resolve such a case in favour of the nation that received points from a higher number of countries rather than taking into account the number of top scores (12 points) received. The draw for running order was held on 29 November 2002 inRiga, hosted by Marie N and Renārs Kaupers, with the results being revealed during a delayed broadcast of the proceedings later that day.[25][26]
The official sponsors for the contest were Latvian mobile telecom providerLatvijas Mobilais Telefons and Latvian bank companyParex Banka.[27] LTV selected Latvia Tours as its official partner to provide lodging, travel and recreation for the contest delegations and other guests.[28] Riga City Council was also responsible for offering promotion and activities during the week preceding the contest.[29]
Full preparations for the 2003 contest began on 18 May 2003 at the Skonto Hall. There were rehearsals, press conferences and participants were also involved in an internet chat.[30] Two dress rehearsals were held on 23 May, in front of an estimated 12,000 people. The organisers of the contest held a press conference; one of the issues complained about was the lack of invitations for the after-party. The final dress rehearsal was held on 24 May, the day of the contest. A simulation of the voting procedure was also held, in which the presenters linked up with all twenty-six countries by satellite for the first time.[30]
On the day of the contest, bookmakerWilliam Hill's odds placed Russia as joint favourites to win the contest with Spain. Ireland, Slovenia, Estonia, Norway and Iceland were behind in third, fourth and joint fifth respectively.[31] At the conclusion of the contest, favourites Russia placed third and Spain placed eighth, while outsiders Turkey (20-1) and Belgium (50-1) claimed the first and second places, respectively. Austria, at 100–1, were favourites to finish last, however, they scored their best result since1989, placing sixth.[31]
An officialcompilation album, featuring all twenty-six competing entries from the contest, was released for the first time on theEMI/CMC label.[32]
The design of the contest was built around the theme "Magical rendez-vous", which represented the meeting of the various European nations coming to Latvia and encountering Latvia's versatile landscapes.[33][11] LTV launched a competition in order to find the logo for the contest. At the close of the competition, high interest from the public translated into 204 logo submissions, which were ultimately judged by a jury panel consisting of Uldis-Ivars Grava (general director of LTV), Arvīds Babris (then executive producer of the contest), Ugis Brikmanis (director), Laimonis Šteinbergs (artist), Ingūna Rībena (architect), Arta Giga (LTV representative) and Juhan Paadam (EBU representative).[34] On 16 November 2002, LTV and the EBU presented the logo for the contest which was designed by the director of the Computer Graphics Department of LTV, Maris Kalve with further elaboration by LTV's chief artist Kristaps Skulte.[35] The logo was namedupes, theLatvian word for rivers, and carried the slogan "All rivers flow toward the sea, all songs flow toward the Eurovision Song Contest".
The postcards shown between the entries were directed by Ugis Brikmanis and featured the artists competing at the contest interacting with Latvia's various landscapes: forests, rivers, lakes and towns. The postcards were recorded during the preceding week of the contest and ran behind schedule, leading to some postcards featuring only footage from the rehearsals and press conferences.[36]
The stage design was created by Aigars Ozoliņš and based on the concept called Planet Latvia.[37][38] The stage used several light and video effects and included an innovation new to the contest – a video screen stage floor that could be used to give each entry a unique look.[38] The green room where the delegations and competitors awaited the results of the contest was placed directly behind the stage and unveiled shortly before the voting portion of the show commenced, allowing the audience to see the representatives of the competing nations as they received points.[39] For the first time, the scoreboard automatically rearranged itself in descending order as each point was awarded, making it easier for the audience and television viewers to follow the exact progress of the competitors throughout the voting process.
Initially, Arvīds Babris, head of the Latvian delegation at the 2002 contest, was appointed as executive producer for the contest, however, after production fell behind schedule and the EBU applied pressure upon LTV, he was dismissed and Brigita Rozenbrika took over the position, receiving additional support from the Swedish broadcasterSveriges Television (SVT) and Estonian broadcasterEesti Televisioon (ETV).[11][40][41] SVT was also the technical producer of the contest for the second year running withSven Stojanović as director and the Swedish lighting company Spectra+ contracted for the contest.[42][43]
The EBU reintroduced televoting as an obligatory voting mode in all participating countries, which awarded 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 12 points to their ten favourite songs, in ascending order. Countries voted in the same order as they had performed. Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russia were granted an exception to holding a televote as they cited that their telecommunications penetration was less than 80%.[44][9] Polish broadcasterTelewizja Polska opted to use onlySMS-voting.[45] In the televoting/smsvoting household shall not be permitted to vote more than three times.[9] All other participating broadcasters planned to use a televote. Due to a technical issue,Ireland used results from their back-up jury instead of televoting.[46] This contest was also the first to introduce a computer-generated scoreboard which rearranged itself in order as the points were awarded. Participating broadcasters were required to assemble back-up juries that consisted of eight voting members, with age and gender equally distributed, in the case of televote failure on the night of the competition.[9] Four members of the jury had to be members of the general public and the other four members had to be music professionals.[9]
With the increased number of potential participating countries, the EBU began to review the format of the contest with potential changes being considered such as adding extra evenings for the show, holding a regional pre-selection, or putting a limit to number of participating countries by increasing the entrance fee. On 29 January 2003, the EBU unveiled a two-night system for the contest in 2004: a semi-final would be held before a grand final. The "Big Four", along with the top ten from the 2003 contest, would automatically qualify for the2004 final.[47] The format change eliminated the relegation system, allowing all countries to send an artist and song to the contest. The fourteen eventual countries from the 2003 contest that qualified to compete directly in the 2004 final were Turkey, Belgium, Russia, Norway, Sweden, Austria, Poland, Spain, Iceland, Romania, Ireland, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. All other countries would have to compete in the semi-final for ten remaining spots in the final.
The contest featured special guests that communicated with the hosts via satellite:Lys Assia, winner of the1956 contest greeted the hosts and spectators fromNicosia,Elton John spoke to the presenters live from theLife Ball inVienna and one astronaut and one cosmonaut—Ed Lu andYuri Malenchenko—gave their greetings from theInternational Space Station.[48][49][50] The interval act for the contest was a short film directed by Anna Viduleja that featured a sequence of performances by Latvian post-folklore group Iļģi, Renārs Kaupers' bandBrainstorm,Marie N and piano playerRaimonds Pauls.[51]
The UK's result was their worst-ever at Eurovision; by contrast, Turkey's win was their first. Alf Poier's sixth place was Austria's best result for fourteen years, Poland's seventh place was their best in nine, and Romania's tenth place was one place behind their best-ever. Belgium's second place was their first top-five finish in seventeen years, while Spain's eighth place (tied with Iceland's, which had its best result since 1999) was their third top-ten finish in a row, but Latvia's third-from-bottom finish was their worst result in four attempts; it was also the worst placing for a host country since 1992, until 2015 when host country Austria received 'nul points' and came second to last (Germany also received 'nul points' but because of the running order Austria placed ahead of them).
Each participating broadcaster appointed a spokesperson who was responsible for announcing, in English or French, the votes for its respective country. The voting order in the 2003 contest was the order in which the countries had been drawn to perform. The spokespersons for each country were:
Each participating broadcaster was required to relay live and in full the contest via television. Non-participating EBU member broadcasters were also able to relay the contest as "passive participants"; any passive countries wishing to participate in the following year's event were also required to provide a live broadcast of the contest or a deferred broadcast within 24 hours.[9] Broadcasters were able to send commentators to provide coverage of the contest in their own native language and to relay information about the artists and songs to their viewers. Known details on the broadcasts in each country, including the specific broadcasting stations and commentators, are shown in the tables below. Broadcasters in 42 countries were reported to have broadcast the event live or deferred, including broadcasters in Albania, Armenia, Australia, Belarus, Puerto Rico, Serbia and Montenegro, and the United States.[61][62][63]
Broadcasters and commentators in participating countries[61]
In January 2003, German news magazineDer Spiegel reported that Riga was suffering from serious financial problems that could lead to a breach of contract so the contest might need to be moved to another city.[112] Ilona Bērziņa, spokesperson of LTV, denied that potential financial issues the city council of Riga may be facing would interrupt the organisation of the contest.[113] In February 2003,The Baltic Times reported that a committee of Riga municipality rejected the proposal to withdraw the funds it pledged in support of organising the contest.[114]
In March 2003, Danish newspaperB.T. published an article based on accusations that the EBU television director Bjørn Erichsen made in reference to LTV suffering from organisational chaos which could result in the removal of Latvia's hosting duties since they were running behind schedule.[115] The general director of LTV, Uldis-Ivars Grava, replied, saying: "A few weeks ago, the EBU's legal director, Werner Rumphorst, was in Riga, and I spent an entire day with him and with the former general director of the Danish broadcasterDR, Bjørn Erichsen. We talked about co-operation and about programme exchanges, and neither of them said a single word that would indicate any doubts, lack of trust or accusation."[116] Ingrida Smite, head of press for the Eurovision Song Contest 2003, reaffirmed that the contest would take place in Riga despite reports to the contrary.[116]
Upon the selection of the Russian artistst.A.T.u., the duo gave an interview to German tabloidBild in March 2003 where they claimed that they would win the contest without a doubt and criticised the German entrantLou calling her a witch with duo memberJulia Volkova (also referring to Germany's 2002 entrant) stating, "In Russia we nurse blind and old people, but we don't send them to the Grand Prix. This must be different in Germany."[117] Lou later responded to the comments stating, "I don't know whether bitching, fighting and boozing kids are the right representatives for such a beautiful country as Russia."
t.A.T.u.'s first rehearsal dominated proceedings on 20 May—the band were supposed to rehearse the day before, but had turned up a day late, claiming that Julia Volkova was suffering from a sore throat.[118] The group were booed by journalists during their press conference where they complained about the production's poor lighting and stage. EBU supervisor Sarah Yuen said "They are the bad girls of pop… we shouldn’t have expected them to come here and be nice and pleasant."[119] The EBU had originally planned to have a pre-recorded performance of the Russian entry ready to substitute during the live broadcast in case the duo performed a lesbian publicity stunt on stage, which they deemed inappropriate for a family entertainment show.[120] The EBU later stated that the performance would be broadcast live without any interruption.[121][122]
After the contest, Russian broadcasterChannel One complained that Irish broadcasterRTÉ had used a back-up jury, and that it had cost them victory. A statement by Channel One said "Considering [the] insignificant difference in points between the first and third places, there are grounds to believe that the contest results could be much different for Russia."[123][124] On the night of the competition, the voting polls operated by Irish telecommunications companyEircom suffered a delay in delivering the results on time, which prompted RTÉ to use the votes of the back-up jury instead.[46] The EBU cleared RTÉ of any potential wrongdoing after an investigation on the matter and stated that the rules concerning substituting the back-up jury in place of the televote were correctly applied.[46] RTÉ later published the unused results of the televote, which showed that had the jury not been used, Turkey would still have won, and Ireland's voting "partners", the United Kingdom, would still have no points. Russia did not receive any points from the televote, however, since Belgium only received 2 points from the Irish televote as opposed to 10 points awarded by the Irish jury, Russia would have placed second.[125]
For the second year, theMarcel Bezençon Awards, organised by Sweden's then-Head of Delegation and 1992 representativeChrister Björkman, and 1984 winnerRichard Herrey, honoured songs in the contest.[126] The awards were divided into three categories: the Artistic Award, the Fan Award, and the Press Award.[127] The Fan Award was decided by the combined votes from members ofOGAE, an organisation consisting of a network of over 40 Eurovision Song Contest fan clubs across Europe and beyond.[128][129]
Eurovision Song Contest: Riga 2003 was the official compilation album of the 2003 contest, put together by the European Broadcasting Union and released byCMC International on 19 May 2003. The album featured all 26 songs that entered in the 2003 contest.[130]
^Thorsson, Leif; Verhage, Martin (2006).Melodifestivalen genom tiderna : de svenska uttagningarna och internationella finalerna (in Swedish). Stockholm: Premium Publishing. pp. 312–313.ISBN91-89136-29-2.
^Van Roey, Laurent (24 May 2003)."L'acteur t.A.T.u." [Actor t.A.T.u.].Le Soir (in French).Brussels, Belgium.Archived from the original on 8 December 2022. Retrieved8 December 2022.
^Šaitere, Tekla (22 May 2003)."www.eurovision.tv".Diena (in Latvian).Riga, Latvia.Archived from the original on 8 December 2022. Retrieved8 December 2022.
^Šinik, Gorazd (23 May 2003)."Prosim, ne zaspite pred televizorjem" [Please don't fall asleep in front of the TV](PDF).Gorenjski Glas (in Slovenian). p. 32.Archived(PDF) from the original on 8 December 2022. Retrieved9 December 2022.
^"TV & Radio i dag" [TV & Radio today].Dagens Nyheter (in Swedish).Stockholm, Sweden. 24 May 2003. p. 52.
^"Radioprogram 24 maj 2003" [Radio programme 24 May 2003].Dagens Nyheter (in Swedish).Stockholm, Sweden. 24 May 2003. p. 51.
^"Субота, 24 травня" [Saturday, 24 May].Nove Zhyttia (in Ukrainian). 17 May 2003.Archived from the original on 8 December 2022. Retrieved8 December 2022.
^"Radio Suomi".Helsingin Sanomat (in Finnish).Helsinki, Finland. 24 May 2003.Archived from the original on 7 November 2022. Retrieved7 November 2022.
^"Radio Vega".Helsingin Sanomat (in Finnish).Helsinki, Finland. 24 May 2003.Archived from the original on 7 November 2022. Retrieved7 November 2022.
^"L'Eurofestival più gay" [The gayest Eurovision Song Contest] (in Italian).GAY.tv. 23 May 2003.Archived from the original on 8 December 2022. Retrieved8 December 2022.
^"Sobota 24. V" [Saturday 24 May](PDF).Kurier Wileński (in Polish).Vilnius, Lithuania. 23–25 May 2000. p. 10. Retrieved11 June 2024 – via Polonijna Biblioteka Cyfrowa.
^"24. мај – Субота" [24 May – Saturday].TV Novosti [sr] (in Serbian (Cyrillic script)).Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro. 24 May 2003. p. 23. Retrieved6 November 2024.
^Rau, Oliver (28 January 2003)."Financial problems in Riga". ESCToday.com.Archived from the original on 23 September 2020. Retrieved16 November 2013.
^"Klubi-info: Mikä ihmeen OGAE?" [The club info: What on Earth is OGAE?] (in Finnish). OGAE Finland. 5 June 2012. Archived fromthe original on 27 January 2012. Retrieved17 June 2012.