European Service Module

The ESM is visible at left as Orion approaches the Moon on theArtemis I mission
Manufacturer	Airbus Defence and Space
Designer	ESA
Operator	NASA
Dimensions
Height	4 m (13 ft)[1]
Diameter	4.1 m (13 ft 5 in) excluding solar panels 5.2 m (17 ft 1 in) with solar panels stowed 19 m (62 ft 4 in) with solar panels deployed
Production
Status	Operational
Maiden launch	November 16, 2022 (Artemis I)
Related spacecraft
Derived from	Automated Transfer Vehicle
Flown with	Orion
Propulsion
Propellant mass	8,600 kg (19,000 lb)[2][3]
Powered by	1 ×AJ10 8 ×R-4D
Maximum thrust	AJ10: 26.6 kN (6,000 lbf) R-4D: 3.92 kN (880 lbf)
Propellant	MON-3/MMH

TheEuropean Service Module (ESM) is theservice module component of theOrion spacecraft, serving as its primary power and propulsion component until it is discarded at the end of each mission. In January 2013,NASA announced that theEuropean Space Agency (ESA) will contribute the service module forArtemis I, based on the ESA'sAutomated Transfer Vehicle (ATV). It was delivered byAirbus Defence and Space inBremen, in northern Germany to NASA at the end of 2018. After approval of the first module, the ESA will provide the ESMs fromArtemis II toArtemis VI. However, theTrump administration has called for the termination of Orion spacecraft program after Artemis III.

The module's first flight wasArtemis I, the first major milestone in NASA'sArtemis program to return humans to the Moon, on November 16, 2022. TheSpace Launch System launched Orion toward the Moon, where the ESM placed the spacecraft intodistant retrograde orbit around the Moon, and subsequently extracted it from that orbit and sent it back to Earth.

The service module (SM) supports the crew module (CM) from launch through to separation prior to reentry. It provides in-space propulsion capability for orbital transfer,attitude control, and high altitude ascent aborts. It provides the water and oxygen needed for a habitable environment, generates and stores electrical power, and maintains the temperature of the vehicle's systems and components. This module can also transport unpressurized cargo and scientific payloads.^[4]

Roughly cylindrical in shape, the original American-designed Orion SM, like the CM, would have been constructed ofAl-Li alloy (to keep weight down), and would have featured a pair of deployabledecagonalsolar panels, similar in design to the panels used on theMars Phoenix lander. The panels, the first to be used on a U.S. crewed spacecraft (except for a 10-year period, the Soviet/RussianSoyuz spacecraft has used them since the first mission in 1967), would allow NASA to eliminate the need to carry malfunction-prone fuel cells, and their associated hardware (mainlyliquid H₂ tanks) in the SM, resulting in a shorter and more maneuverable spacecraft. Successful initial testing of an Orion solar array design using full-scale "UltraFlex wing" hardware was reported in October 2008.^[5]

The Orion Main Engine (OME) was a 33-kilonewton (7,500 lbf) thrust, pressure-fed, regeneratively cooled, storable bi-propellant rocket engine to be made by Aerojet. The OME was an increased performance version of the 27-kilonewton (6,000 lbf) thrust rocket engine used by the Space Shuttle for its Orbital Maneuvering System. The SM Reaction Control System (RCS), the spacecraft's maneuvering thrusters (originally based on the Apollo "quad" system, but resembling that used on its predecessor, Gemini), would also be pressure-fed, and would use the same propellants. NASA believed the SM RCS would be able to act as a backup for atrans-Earth injection burn in case the main SM engine failed.

A pair of liquid oxygen tanks (similar to those used in theApollo service module) would provide, along with small tanks of nitrogen, the crew with breathing air at sea-level or "cruising altitude" pressure (1 or 0.7 atm), with a small "surge tank" providing necessary life support during reentry and touchdown.Lithium hydroxide (LiOH) cartridges would recycle the spacecraft's environmental system by "scrubbing" the carbon dioxide (CO₂) exhaled by the astronauts from ship's air and adding fresh oxygen and nitrogen, which was then cycled back out into the system loop. Because of the switch from fuel cells to solar panels, the service module would have an onboard water tank to provide drinking water for the crew, and (when mixed withglycol), cooling water for the spacecraft's electronics. Unlike the practice during Apollo of dumping both water and urine overboard during the flight, the Orion would have an onboard recycling system, identical to that used on theInternational Space Station, to convert both waste water and urine into both drinking and cooling water.

The service module also mounted the spacecraft's waste heat management system (its radiators) and the aforementionedsolar panels. These panels, along with backup batteries located in the Orion CM, would provide in-flight power to the ship's systems. The voltage, 28voltsDC, was similar to that used on the Apollo spacecraft during flight.

The Orion SM would be encapsulated by fiberglass shrouds jettisoned at the same time as the LES/Boost Protective Cover, which would take place roughly 21⁄2 minutes after launch (30 seconds after the solid rocket first stage was jettisoned). Prior to the "Orion 606" redesign, the Orion SM resembled a squat, enlarged version of theApollo service module. The "Orion 606" SM design retained the 5-meter (16 ft) width for the attachments of the Orion SM with the Orion CM, but used a Soyuz-like service module design to allow Lockheed Martin to make the vehicle lighter in weight and permitting the attachment of the decagonal solar panels at the module's midpoints, instead of at the base near the spacecraft/rocket adapter, which might have subjected the panels to damage.

The Orion service module (SM) was projected comprising acylindrical shape, having a diameter of 5 m (16 ft) and an overall length (including thruster) of 4.78 m (15 ft 8 in). The projected empty mass was 3,600 kg (8,000 lb), fuel capacity was 8,200 kg (18,000 lb).^[6][7]

A review of the Constellation program in 2009 by thenew Augustine Commission prompted by the then newObama administration had found that five years in, the service module development program was already running four years behind its 2020 lunar target and was woefully underfunded. The only element worth continuing was the Crew Exploration Vehicle in the role of a space station escape capsule.^[8] This led in 2010 to the Administration cancelling the program by withdrawing funding in the proposed 2011 budget. A public outcry led to the program being frozen rather than outright cancelled and a review launched in to how costs could be cut, which found that it was possible to continue if there was an emphasis on finding alternate funding, reducing the complexity by narrowing the scope to focus on the Moon and deep space rather than Mars, and by reusing existing hardware, reducing the range of equipment requiring development. The Ares I launcher intended for crew flights had significant design issues such as being overweight and prone to dangerous vibration, and in the case of a catastrophic failure its blast radius exceeded the escape system's ejection range.^{[citation needed]} Its role as the Orion launch vehicle was replaced by theSpace Launch System, and the three different Crew Exploration Vehicle designs were merged in to a single Multipurpose Crew Exploration Vehicle.

In May 2011, theEuropean Space Agency's (ESA) director general announced a possible collaboration with NASA to work on a successor to ESA'sAutomated Transfer Vehicle (ATV).^[9] ESA's provision of this successor could be counted towards its 8% share of the operating costs of theInternational Space Station (ISS); the ATV missions resupplying the station only covered this obligation up to 2017. On 21 June 2012,Astrium announced that it had been awarded two separate studies to evaluate possible future missions building on the technology and experience gained from its development of ATV and theColumbus laboratory. The first study looked into the construction of a service module which would be used in tandem with the Orion capsule.^[10] The second examined the production of a versatile multi-purpose orbital vehicle. Each study was worth €6.5 million.^[11]

In November 2012, ESA obtained the commitment of its member states for it to construct an ATV-derived service module for Orion, to fly on the maiden flight of theSpace Launch System, thereby meeting ESA's budgetary obligation to NASA regarding the ISS for 2017–2020.^[12] No decision was made about supplying the module for later Orion flights.^[13]

In January 2013, NASA announced its agreement, made the preceding December, that ESA would build the service module for Exploration Mission-1 (renamedArtemis I), then scheduled to take place in 2017. This service module was not required forExploration Flight Test-1 in 2014, as this used a test service module supplied by Lockheed Martin.^[14] On 17 November 2014 ESA signed a €390 million fixed price contract withAirbus Defence and Space for the development and construction of the first ATV-based service module.^[15] In December 2016, ESA's member states agreed it would extend its commitment to the ISS to 2024, and would supply a second service module, as part of the resulting budgetary obligation.^[16]

The new design^[17] is approximately 5.0 meters (16.5 ft) in diameter and 4.0 meters (13 ft) in length, and made ofaluminium-lithium alloy.^[18]

The service module's main engine for Artemis I was aSpace Shuttle Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS) AJ10-190 engine left over from the Space Shuttle program,^[17] in which it flew on 19 missions and carried out 89 burns.^[18] It is intended that the OMS will be used for the first three (or five^[19]) service modules and four alternate engine designs are under consideration for later flights, thought to include the AJ10-118k; used for the second stage of the Delta II it is a lighter and more powerful version in the same AJ10 engine family whose lineage began with theVanguard.^[20]

In comparison with theApollo command and service module, which previously took astronauts to the Moon, the European Service Module (ESM) generates approximately twice as much electricity (11.2 kW vs 6.3 kW), weighs nearly 40% less when fully fueled (15,461 kg,^[21] vs 24,520 kg) and is roughly the same size (4 m in length excluding engine^[22] and 4.1 m vs 3.9 m in diameter) supporting the environment for a slightly (45%) larger habitable volume on the crew module (8.95 m³ vs 6.17 m³) though it will carry 50% less propellant for orbital maneuvers (8,600 kg usable propellant vs 18,584 kg).

The ESM will be able to support a crew of four for 21 days which exceeds the 14 day endurance for the three-man Apollo.

The new design for the solar arrays, replacingATK'sdecagonal (labeled "circular") UltraFlex design,^[23] is byAirbus Defence and Space,^[18] whose subsidiary, Airbus Defence and Space Netherlands (then known as Dutch Space), built the ATV's X-shaped array of four panels. The ATV's array was expected to generate 4.6 kilowatts. The upgraded version for the service module will generate about 11 kilowatts,^[23] and will span about 19 m (62 ft) when extended.^[18]

In September 2015,Thales Alenia Space signed a contract with Airbus Defence and Space to develop and produce thermomechanical systems for the service module, including structure and micrometeoroid protection, thermal control and consumable storage and distribution.^[24]

Lockheed Martin is building the twoadapters, connecting the service module to the crew module and to the upper stage of the Space Launch System, and also the threefairing panels that are jettisoned after protecting the service module during launch and ascent.^[18]

On 16 February 2017 a €200m contract was signed between Airbus and the European Space Agency for the production of a second European service module for use on the first crewed Orion flight.^[25]

On 26 October 2018 the first unit for Artemis I was assembled in full at Airbus Defence and Space's factory inBremen.^[26]

In November 2019, ESA member states approved the financing of ESMs for Artemis III and IV.^[27] In May 2020 the contract between Airbus and the European Space Agency for the production of a third European Service Module was signed.^[28]

In October 2020, ESA and NASA sign amemorandum of understanding which includes the provision by ESA of ESM-4 and ESM-5 as a participation in the Gateway space station, allowing three flights of European astronauts to Lunar orbit between 2025 and 2030.^[29]

In February 2021, the contract between Airbus and the European Space Agency to provide ESM-4 to ESM-6 was signed.^[30]

However on 2 May 2025, theTrump administration released its fiscal year 2026 budget proposal for NASA, which calls for terminating the Orion program after Artemis III.^[31][32] The budget allocates funding for a program to transition to "more cost-effective commercial systems".^[33]

• Orion Spacecraft at NASAArchived 2020-11-12 at theWayback Machine
• Orion at ESA
• European Service Module at Airbus Defence and SpaceArchived 2016-10-18 at theWayback Machine

• Orion (spacecraft)
• Constellation program
• Proposed European Space Agency spacecraft

• Source attribution
• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• All articles with unsourced statements
• Articles with unsourced statements from March 2020
• Webarchive template wayback links