Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Eumetazoa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Basal animal clade as a sister group of the Porifera

Eumetazoa
Temporal range:Ediacaran -Present600–0 Ma
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Kingdom:Animalia
Subkingdom:Eumetazoa
Buetschli, 1910
Subdivisions
Synonyms
  • EnterozoaLankester, 1877, em. Beklemishev[3][4]
  • EpitheliozoaAx, 1996
  • HistozoaUlrich, 1950[5][6]

Eumetazoa (from Ancient Greek εὖ () 'well' μετά (metá) 'after' and ζῷον (zôion) 'animal'), also known asEpitheliozoa orHistozoa, is a proposedbasalanimalsubkingdom as asister group ofPorifera (sponges).[7][8][9][10][11] The basal eumetazoan clades are theCtenophora and theParaHoxozoa.Placozoa is now also seen as a eumetazoan in the ParaHoxozoa. The competing hypothesis is theMyriazoa clade.[12] The subkingdomParazoa andAgnotozoa are the other taxa, and agnotozoa may be fake or even nonexistent at studies. Parazoa or Agnotozoa are a main sister group to eumetazoans, forming clade Blastozoa/Diploblastozoa. Alternatively,Parazoa was considered as a sister group to Agnotozoa (now considered polyphyletic).Several other extinct or obscure life forms, such asIotuba andThectardis, appear to have emerged in the group.[13] Characteristics of eumetazoans include truetissues organized intogerm layers, the presence ofneurons andmuscles, and an embryo that goes through agastrula stage.

Somephylogenists once speculated the sponges and eumetazoansevolved separately from different single-celled organisms, which would have meant that the animal kingdom does not form aclade (a complete grouping of all organisms descended from a common ancestor). However, genetic studies and some morphological characteristics, like the common presence ofchoanocytes, now unanimously support a common origin.[14]

Traditionally, eumetazoans are a major group ofanimals in the Five Kingdoms classification ofLynn Margulis and K. V. Schwartz, comprising theRadiata andBilateria – all animals except thesponges.[15]

Evolutionary origins

[edit]

It has been suggested that one type ofmolecular clock and one approach to interpretation of the fossil record both place the evolutionary origins of eumetazoa in theEdiacaran.[16] However, the earliest eumetazoans may not have left a clear impact on the fossil record and other interpretations of molecular clocks suggest the possibility of an earlier origin.[17] The discoverers ofVernanimalcula describe it as the fossil of abilateraltriploblastic animal that appeared at the end of theMarinoan glaciation prior to theEdiacaran period, implying an even earlier origin for eumetazoans.[18] Various ediacaran organisms have been tentatively classified aseumetazoans. But so far, very fewEdiacaran organisms have been identified as definite eumetazoans like-Kimberella,Haootia andDickinsonia. Ediacaran fossils preserve very little details so identifying one as an animal with true tissue is very difficult. Many extinct phyla have been proposed by many researchers that may fall under the clade. These areProarticulata,Trilobozoa andPetalonamae. The inclusion of these within eumetazoa as well as the position of these within the clade is highly debated and sometimes considered speculative. Theproarticulates are considered as stembilaterians by most authors.[19] Together the three phyla are grouped as the gradeVendobionta.The petalonamids are often considered as early diverging animals before animals with true tissue organisation started to appear.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Peng, Tingzu; Yang, Yuning; Yun, Hao; Yang, Xinglian; Zhang, Qianqian; He, Min; Chi, Xiangri; Liu, Jing; Liu, Xi (2024)."Flourishing chancelloriids from the Cambrian Kaili Biota of South China".Historical Biology.36 (7):1302–1320.Bibcode:2024HBio...36.1302P.doi:10.1080/08912963.2023.2212382.
  2. ^Fedonkin, M. A. (1990). Systematic description of Vendian Metazoa. In: Sokolov, B. S. & Iwanowski, A. B. (eds), *The Vendian System: Historical–Geological and Paleontological Foundation*, Vol. 1. Springer, pp. 71–120. Fedonkin describes trilobozoans as coelenterate-like organisms, implying eumetazoan affinities.
  3. ^Lankester, Ray (1877). "Notes on the Embryology and classification of the Animal kingdom: comprising a revision of speculations relative to the origin and significance of the germ-layers".Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science (N.S.), No. 68: 399–454.
  4. ^Beklemishev, V. L.The basis of the comparative anatomy of the invertebrates [Основы сравнительной анатомии беспозвоночных]. 1st ed., 1944; 2nd ed., 1950; 3rd ed. (2 vols.), 1964. English translation, 1969,[1]. Akademia Nauk, Moscow, Leningrad.
  5. ^Ax, Peter (2012-12-06).Multicellular Animals: A new Approach to the Phylogenetic Order in Nature. Springer Science & Business Media.ISBN 9783642801143.
  6. ^Ulrich, W. (1950). "Begriff und Einteilung der Protozoen". In Grüneberg, H. (ed.).Moderne Biologie. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Hans Nachtsheim (in German). Berlin: Peters. pp. 241–250.
  7. ^Feuda, Roberto; Dohrmann, Martin; Pett, Walker; Philippe, Hervé; Rota-Stabelli, Omar; Lartillot, Nicolas; Wörheide, Gert; Pisani, Davide (2017)."Improved Modeling of Compositional Heterogeneity Supports Sponges as Sister to All Other Animals".Current Biology.27 (24): 3864–3870.e4.Bibcode:2017CBio...27E3864F.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.008.hdl:10449/43929.PMID 29199080.
  8. ^Pisani, Davide; Pett, Walker; Dohrmann, Martin; Feuda, Roberto; Rota-Stabelli, Omar; Philippe, Hervé; Lartillot, Nicolas; Wörheide, Gert (15 December 2015)."Genomic data do not support comb jellies as the sister group to all other animals".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.112 (50):15402–15407.Bibcode:2015PNAS..11215402P.doi:10.1073/pnas.1518127112.PMC 4687580.PMID 26621703.
  9. ^Simion, Paul; Philippe, Hervé; Baurain, Denis; Jager, Muriel; Richter, Daniel J.; Franco, Arnaud Di; Roure, Béatrice; Satoh, Nori; Quéinnec, Éric (3 April 2017)."A Large and Consistent Phylogenomic Dataset Supports Sponges as the Sister Group to All Other Animals"(PDF).Current Biology.27 (7):958–967.Bibcode:2017CBio...27..958S.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.031.PMID 28318975.S2CID 4560353.
  10. ^Giribet, Gonzalo (1 October 2016)."Genomics and the animal tree of life: conflicts and future prospects".Zoologica Scripta.45:14–21.doi:10.1111/zsc.12215.
  11. ^Laumer, Christopher E; Gruber-Vodicka, Harald; Hadfield, Michael G; Pearse, Vicki B; Riesgo, Ana; Marioni, John C; Giribet, Gonzalo (2018-10-30)."Support for a clade of Placozoa and Cnidaria in genes with minimal compositional bias".eLife.7 e36278.doi:10.7554/elife.36278.ISSN 2050-084X.PMC 6277202.PMID 30373720.
  12. ^Schultz, Darrin T.; Haddock, Steven H. D.; Bredeson, Jessen V.; Green, Richard E.; Simakov, Oleg; Rokhsar, Daniel S. (2023-05-17)."Ancient gene linkages support ctenophores as sister to other animals".Nature.618 (7963):110–117.Bibcode:2023Natur.618..110S.doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05936-6.ISSN 1476-4687.PMC 10232365.PMID 37198475.
  13. ^Martindale, Mark Q.; Kourakis, Matthew J. (1999). "Hox clusters: Size doesn't matter".Nature.399 (6738):730–731.Bibcode:1999Natur.399..730M.doi:10.1038/21530.PMID 10391234.S2CID 43414178.
  14. ^H., Philippe; Derelle, R.; Lopez, P.; et al. (April 2009)."Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships".Current Biology.19 (8):706–712.Bibcode:2009CBio...19..706P.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.052.PMID 19345102.S2CID 15282843.
  15. ^"Systema Naturae 2000 Taxon: Subkingdom Eumetazoa".Archived 2009-03-22 at theWayback Machine. Retrieved February 2, 2006
  16. ^Peterson KJ, Butterfield NJ (July 2005)."Origin of the Eumetazoa: testing ecological predictions of molecular clocks against the Proterozoic fossil record".Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.102 (27):9547–52.Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.9547P.doi:10.1073/pnas.0503660102.PMC 1172262.PMID 15983372.
  17. ^Blair, J. E.; Hedges, S. B. (March 2005)."Molecular clocks do not support the Cambrian explosion".Molecular Biology and Evolution.22 (3):387–390.doi:10.1093/molbev/msi039.PMID 15537810.
  18. ^Chen, J.-Y.; Bottjer, D.J.; Oliveri, P.; Dornbos, S.Q.; Gao, F.; Ruffins, S.; Chi, H.; Li, C.-W.; Davidson, E.H.; et al. (9 July 2004)."Small bilaterian fossils from 40 to 55 million years before the Cambrian".Science.305 (5681):218–222.Bibcode:2004Sci...305..218C.doi:10.1126/science.1099213.PMID 15178752.S2CID 115443209.
  19. ^Ivantsov, A. Yu. (2021). "Proarticulates—an extinct phylum of soft-bodied metazoans, or a group of vendobionts par excellence?"Symmetry.13(2): 160.Full text. doi:10.3390/sym13020160.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toEumetazoa.
Wikispecies has information related toEumetazoa.
Animalia
ParaHoxozoa
(Planulozoa)
Bilateria (Triploblasts)
  • (see below↓)
Thephylogeny of the animal rootis disputed; see also
Eumetazoa
Benthozoa
Bilateria
Ambulacraria
Protostomia
Ecdysozoa
Scalidophora
N+L+P
Nematoida
L+P
Panarthropoda
Spiralia
Gnathifera
M+S
Platytrochozoa
R+M
Rouphozoa
Mesozoa
Lophotrochozoa
M+K
Kryptotrochozoa
Lophophorata
Bryozoa s.l.
Brachiozoa

Major groups
within phyla
Phyla with ≥1000 extant speciesbolded
Potentiallydubious phyla
Eumetazoa
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eumetazoa&oldid=1322447742"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp