Era of Good Feelings
1815–1825
Jeffersonian era Jacksonian era
Independence Day Celebration in Centre Square by John Lewis Krimmel, 1819
Including	Antebellum South
President	James Monroe
Key events	Missouri Compromise Panic of 1819 Adams-Onis Treaty Monroe Doctrine

This article is part of a series on the
History of the United States
Timeline and periods Prehistoric andPre-Columbian Era until 1607 Colonial Era 1607–1765 1776–1789     American Revolution 1765–1783     Confederation period 1783–1788 1789–1815     Federalist Era 1788–1801     Jeffersonian Era 1801–1817 1815–1849     Era of Good Feelings 1817–1825     Jacksonian Era 1825–1849 1849–1865     Civil War Era 1849–1865     Greater Reconstruction 1846–1898 1865–1917     Reconstruction Era 1865–1877     Gilded Age 1877–1896     Progressive Era 1896–1917 1917–1945     World War I 1917–1918     Roaring Twenties 1918–1929     Great Depression 1929–1941     World War II 1941–1945 1945–1964     Post-World War II Era 1945–1964     Civil Rights Era 1954–1968 1964–1980     Civil Rights Era 1954–1968     Vietnam War 1964–1975 1980–1991     Reagan Era 1981–1991 1991–2016     Post-Cold War Era 1991–present 2016–present 2016–present
Topics American Century Antisemitism Civil unrest Racial violence Cultural Cinema Music Newspapers Sports Demography Immigration Economy Banking Education Higher education Flag Government Abortion Capital punishment Civil rights Corruption The Constitution Debt ceiling Direct democracy Foreign policy Law enforcement Postal service Taxation Voting rights Journalism Maritime Military Army Marine Corps Navy Air Force Space Force Coast Guard Party Systems First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Religion Social class Slavery Sexual slavery Technology and industry Agriculture Labor Lumber Medicine Railway
Groups African Americans Asian Americans Chinese Americans Filipino Americans Indian Americans Japanese Americans Korean Americans Thai Americans Vietnamese Americans European Americans Albanian Americans English Americans Estonian Americans Finnish Americans German Americans Irish Americans Italian Americans Lithuanian Americans Polish Americans Serbian Americans Hispanic and Latino Americans Mexican Americans Jewish Americans Middle Eastern Americans Egyptian Americans Iranian Americans Iraqi Americans Lebanese Americans Palestinian Americans Saudi Americans Native Americans Cherokee Comanche Pacific Islander Americans Chamorros Hawaiians Women LGBTQ Gay men Lesbians Transgender people
Places Territorial evolution Admission to the Union Historic regions American frontier Manifest destiny Indian removal Regions New England The South The West Coast States AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY Territories DC AS GU MP PR VI Cities Urban history Cities
Outline List of years Historiography Category Portal
v t e

TheEra of Good Feelings marked a period in the politicalhistory of the United States that reflected a sense of national purpose and a desire for unity among Americans in the aftermath of theWar of 1812.^[1][2] The era saw the collapse of theFederalist Party and an end to the bitter partisan disputes between it and the dominantDemocratic-Republican Party during theFirst Party System.^[3][4] PresidentJames Monroe strove to downplay partisan affiliation in making his nominations, with the ultimate goal of national unity and eliminatingpolitical parties altogether from national politics.^[1][5][6] The period is so closely associated withMonroe's presidency (1817–1825) and his administrative goals that his name and the era are virtually synonymous.^[7]

During and after the1824 presidential election, the Democratic-Republican Party split between supporters and opponents ofJacksonian Democracy, leading to theSecond Party System.

Historians often designate the era as one of good feelings with irony or skepticism, as the political atmosphere was strained and divisive, especially among factions within the Monroe administration and the Democratic-Republican Party.^[3][8][9]

The phraseEra of Good Feelings was coined byBenjamin Russell in the BostonFederalist newspaperColumbian Centinel on July 12, 1817, following Monroe's visit toBoston, Massachusetts, as part of his good-will tour of the United States.^[7][10][11]

The Era of Good Feelings started in 1815 at the end of theWar of 1812.^[2] Exultation replaced the bitter political divisions between Federalists and Republicans, the North and South, and the East Coast cities and settlers on theAmerican frontier. The political hostilities declined because theFederalist Party had largely dissolved after the fiasco of theHartford Convention in 1814–15.^[12] As a party, Federalists "had collapsed as a national political force".^[13][14][15] TheDemocratic-Republican Party was nominally dominant, but in practice it was inactive at the national level and in most states.^[16]

The era saw a trend toward national institutions that envisioned "a permanent federal role in the crucial arena of national development and national prosperity".^[17] Monroe's predecessor, PresidentJames Madison, and the Republican Party, had come to appreciate – through the crucibleof war – the expediency of Federalist institutions and projects, and prepared to legislate them under the auspices ofJohn C. Calhoun andHenry Clay'sAmerican System.^{[18][19][20][21]}

Madison announced this shift in policy with hisSeventh Annual Message to Congress in December 1815, subsequently authorizing measures for anational bank and aprotective tariff on manufactures.^[22] Vetoing theBonus Bill onstrict constructionist grounds, Madison nevertheless was determined, as had been his predecessor,Thomas Jefferson,^[23] to see internal improvements implemented with an amendment to the US Constitution.^[24][25] Writing to Monroe, in 1817, Madison declared that "there has never been a moment when such a proposition to the states was so likely to be approved".^[26]The emergence of "new Republicans" – undismayed by mild nationalist policies – anticipated Monroe's "era of good feelings" and a general mood of optimism emerged with hopes for political reconciliation.^[27]

Monroe's landslide victory against FederalistRufus King in the1816 presidential election was so widely predicted that voter turnout was low.^[28][29] A spirit of reconciliation between Republicans and Federalists was well underway when Monroe assumed office in March 1817.^[3][30]

As president, Monroe was widely expected to facilitate a rapprochement of the political parties in order to harmonize the country in a common national outlook, rather than party interests. Both parties exhorted him to include a Federalist in his cabinet to symbolize the new era of "oneness" that pervaded the nation.^[1][3]

Monroe reaffirmed his conviction that the Federalist Party was committed to installing a monarch and overthrowing republican forms of government at the first opportunity.^[31] He stated that if he appointed a Federalist, he would prolong their inevitable decline and fall, and that his administration would never allow itself to become tainted with Federalist ideology.^[32]

Monroe stated that his drive to eliminate the Federalists was part of his campaign to eliminate party associations altogether from national politics, including his own Republican party. All political parties, he wrote, were incompatible with free government by their very nature. He worked to deflate the Federalist Party through neglect. Federalists were denied political patronage, administrative appointments, and federal support. Monroe indicated that he wished to eradicate Federalists from positions of political power, both Federal and State, especially in its New England strongholds. He believed that any expression of official approval would only encourage hope for a Federalist revival, and this he could not abide.^[33]

Some historians believe that Monroe reduced party politics, evidenced by his unopposed run in the1820 presidential election. The Federalists ran no candidate to oppose him, running only a vice-presidential candidate,Richard Stockton. Monroe and his vice president,Daniel D. Tompkins, would have won reelection unanimously through theelectoral college, had there not been a handful offaithless electors; one presidential elector cast his vote forJohn Quincy Adams, while a handful of electors (mostly former Federalists) cast votes for a number of Federalist candidates for vice president. It remains the last presidential election in which a candidate ran essentially unopposed.^{[citation needed]}

The most perfect expression of the Era of Good Feelings was Monroe's country-wide Goodwill tour in 1817 and 1819. His visits to New England and to the Federalist stronghold of Boston, Massachusetts, in particular, were the most significant of the tour.^[34] Here, the descriptive phrase "Era of Good Feelings" was bestowed by a local Federalist journal.

The president's physical appearance, wardrobe and personal attributes were decisive in arousing good feelings on the tour. As the last U.S. president who was aRevolutionary War veteran, he donned a Revolutionary War officer's uniform and tied his long, powdered hair in aqueue according to the old-fashionedstyle of the 18th century.^[35] "Tall, rawboned, venerable", he made an "agreeable" impression and had a good deal of charm and "most men immediately liked him ... [in] manner he was rather formal, having an innate sense of dignity, which allowed no one to take liberties. Yet in spite of his formality, he had the ability to put men at their ease by his courtesy, lack of condescension, his frankness, and what his contemporaries looked upon as the essential goodness and kindness of heart which he always radiated."^[36][37]

Monroe's visit to Boston elicited a huge outpouring of nationalist pride and expressions of reconciliation. New England Federalists were especially eager to demonstrate their loyalty after the debacle of theHartford Convention. Amidst the festivities – banquets, parades, receptions – many took the opportunity to make the most "explicit and solemn declarations" to remove, as Monroe wrote afterwards, "impressions of that kind, which they knew existed, and to get back into the great family of the union".^[38]Abigail Adams dubbed the catharsis an "expiation".^[37]

Here, in the heart of Federalist territory, Monroe gained the primary goal of his tour; in effect, permitting "the Federalists by solemn public demonstrations to reaffirm their loyalty to the government and their acceptance of Republican control".^[34] Even in this atmosphere of contrition, Monroe was assiduous in avoiding any remarks or expressions that might chasten or humiliate his hosts. He presented himself strictly as the head of state, and not as the leader of a triumphant political party.^[37]

In the ensuing years the New England states capitulated, and all but Massachusetts were in Republican Party hands. De-Federalization was virtually complete by 1820, the appointment of former Federalist Party members seemed in order and Monroe feared a backlash. Most anti-Federalist sentiments were political posturing, but he was not so secure of support for his domestic and foreign programs and was concerned at the mounting hostilities over the upcoming presidential contest in 1824, a purely intraparty affair. He never consummated his final reconciliation with the Federalists.^[38]

Monroe's success in mitigating party rancor produced an appearance of political unity, with almost all Americans identifying themselves as Republicans.^[4] His nearly unanimous electoral victory for reelection in 1820 seemed to confirm this.^[39]

Recognizing the danger of intraparty rivalries, Monroe attempted to include prospective presidential candidates and top political leaders in his administration. His cabinet comprised three of the political rivals who would vie for the presidency in 1824:John Quincy Adams,John C. Calhoun andWilliam H. Crawford. A fourth,Andrew Jackson, held high military appointments.^[40] Here, Monroe felt he could manage the factional disputes and arrange compromise on national politics within administration guidelines.^[38] His great disadvantage was that amalgamation deprived him of appealing to Republican "solidarity" that would have cleared the way for passage of his programs in Congress.

"From the moment that Monroe adopted as his guiding principle the maxim that he was head of a nation, not the leader of a party, he repudiated for all practical purposes the party unity" that would have served to establish his policies. The result was a loss of party discipline.^[4][41] Absent was the universal adherence to the precepts of Jeffersonianism: state sovereignty,strict construction and stability of Southern institutions. Old Republican critics of the new nationalism, among themJohn Randolph of Roanoke, Virginia, had warned that the abandonment of the Jeffersonian scheme of Southern preeminence would provoke a sectional conflict, North and South, that would threaten the union.^[4] Former president James Madison had cautioned Monroe that in any free government, it was natural that party identity would take shape.^[40]

The disastrousPanic of 1819 and the Supreme Court'sMcCulloch v. Maryland reanimated the disputes over the supremacy of state sovereignty and federal power, between strict construction of the US Constitution and loose construction.^[42] TheMissouri Crisis in 1820 made the explosive political conflict between slave and free soil open and explicit.^[43] Only through the adroit handling of the legislation by Speaker of the HouseHenry Clay was a settlement reached and disunion avoided.^[13][44][45]

With the decline in political consensus, it became imperative to revive Jeffersonian principles on the basis of Southern exceptionalism.^[46][47] The agrarian alliance, North and South, would be revived to formJacksonian Nationalism and the rise of the modernDemocratic Party.^[48] The interlude of the Era of Good Feelings was at an end.^[31]

• George Dangerfield.The Era of Good Feelings (1952).
• George Dangerfield.The Awakening of American Nationalism: 1815–1828 (1965).
• Howe, Daniel Walker.What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848 (2008).
• Jenkins, Jeffery A., and Charles Stewart III. "Committee Assignments as Side Payments: The Interplay of Leadership and Committee Development in the Era of Good Feelings."Annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 1998.online
• Kaplan, Lawrence S. "Jefferson as Anglophile: Sagacity or Senility in the Era of Good Feelings?"Diplomatic History 16.3 (1992): 487–494.
• Phillips, Kim T. "Democrats of the Old School in the Era of Good Feelings."Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 95.3 (1971): 363–382.online
• Silbey, Joel H. "The Incomplete World of American Politics, 1815–1829: Presidents, Parties and Politics in 'The Era of Good Feelings'."Congress & the Presidency: A Journal of Capital Studies 11#1 (1984) 1–17.
• Sprague, Stuart Seely. "Town Making in the Era of Good Feelings: Kentucky 1814–1820."Register of the Kentucky Historical Society 72.4 (1974): 337–341.online

• Patricia L. Dooley, ed. (2004).The Early Republic: Primary Documents on Events from 1799 to 1820. Greenwood. p. 298ff.ISBN 9780313320842. text of Benjamin Russell editorial
• "President Madison's Veto Message". March 3, 1817. Archived fromthe original on March 4, 2016.
• "President Monroe's Veto Message". May 4, 1822. Archived fromthe original on February 11, 2018.
• "President Monroe's Views of the President of the United States on the Subject of Internal Improvements". May 4, 1822. Archived fromthe original on February 5, 2018.

• Era of Good Feelings
• Eras of United States history
• 1810s in American politics
• 1820s in American politics
• Presidency of James Monroe
• Political history of the United States

• Articles with short description
• Short description matches Wikidata
• Use American English from September 2019
• All Wikipedia articles written in American English
• Use mdy dates from September 2019
• Pages using sidebar with the child parameter
• All articles with unsourced statements
• Articles with unsourced statements from May 2019