Papyrus 49, a 3rd-century manuscript of the Epistle to the Ephesians
TheEpistle to the Ephesians[a] is aPauline epistle and the tenth book of theNew Testament of theChristian Bible. It stands among the canonical writings that shaped early Christian identity and is traditionally grouped with the letters attributed toPaul the Apostle.
The text is traditionally believed to have been written by Paul around AD 62 during his imprisonment inRome. It closely resemblesColossians and is thought to have been addressed to the church inEphesus (now inTurkey), another Pauline epistle whose authorship is debated. As such, many modern scholars dispute the attribution and date the work to AD 70–100 as a circular letter.[4][5]
Ephesians sets out a theological vision of God's plan to unite all creation in Christ and exhorts the church to embody that unity through reconciliation across ethnic boundaries and holy conduct in everyday relationships.[6][7][8][9]
According to New Testament scholarDaniel Wallace, the theme may be stated pragmatically as "Christians, get along with each other! Maintain the unity practically which Christ has effected positionally by his death."[10]
Another major theme in Ephesians is the keeping of Christ's body (that is, the Church) pure and holy.[11]
In the second part of the letter, Ephesians 4:17–6:20, the author gives practical advice in how to live a holy, pure, and Christ-inspired lifestyle.[12]
According to tradition, the Apostle Paul wrote the letter while he was in prison in Rome (around AD 62). This would be about the same time as theEpistle to the Colossians (which in many points it resembles) and theEpistle to Philemon. However, many critical scholars have questioned the authorship of the letter and suggest that it may have been written after Paul’s death.[13][4][14][15]
The first verse in the letter identifies Paul as its author. While early lists of New Testament books, including theMuratorian fragment and possiblyMarcion's canon (if it is to be equated with theEpistle to the Laodiceans), attribute the letter to Paul,[16] more recently there have been challenges to Pauline authorship on the basis of the letter's characteristically non-Pauline syntax, terminology, andeschatology.[17]
Biblical scholarHarold Hoehner, surveying 279 commentaries written between 1519 and 2001, found that 54% favored Pauline authorship, 39% concluded against Pauline authorship and 7% remained uncertain.[18]Norman Perrin and Dennis C. Duling found that of six authoritative scholarly references, "four of the six decide for ppseudonymity, and the other two (Peake's Commentary on the Bible and theJerome Biblical Commentary) recognize the difficulties in maintaining Pauline authorship. Indeed, the difficulties are insurmountable."[19] Bible scholarRaymond E. Brown asserts that about 80% of critical scholarship judges that Paul did not write Ephesians.[20]: p.47 A survey of 109 scholars at the British New Testament Conference in 2011 found 39 in favor of authenticity, while 42 rejected Pauline authorship and 28 were uncertain.[21]
There are four main theories in biblical scholarship that address the question of Pauline authorship.[22]
A second position suggests that Ephesians was dictated by Paul with interpolations from another author. Some of the scholars that espouse this view include Albertz, Benoit, Cerfaux, Goguel, Harrison,H. J. Holtzmann,Murphy-O'Connor, and Wagenführer.
A third group thinks it improbable that Paul authored Ephesians. Among this group are Allan, Beare, Brandon,Rudolf Bultmann, Conzelmann,Dibelius, Goodspeed, Kilsemann, J. Knox, W.L. Knox, Kümmel, K and S Lake, Marxsen, Masson, Mitton, Moffatt,Nineham, Pokorny, Schweizer, and J. Weiss.
Still other scholars suggest there is a lack of conclusive evidence. Some of this group are Cadbury, Julicher, McNeile, and Williams.
Place, date, and purpose of the writing of the letter
Furthermore, if Paul is regarded as the author, the impersonal character of the letter, which lacks personal greetings or any indication that the author has personal knowledge of his recipients, is incongruous with the account in Acts of Paul staying more than two years in Ephesus.[24] For these reasons, most regard Ephesians to be a circular letter intended for many churches.[17][24][25] TheJerusalem Bible notes that some critics think the words "who are" would have been followed by a blank to be filled in with the name of "whichever church was being sent the letter".[26]
If Paul was the author of the letter, then it was probably written from Rome during Paul's first imprisonment,[27] and probably soon after his arrival there in the year 62, four years after he had parted with the Ephesian elders at Miletus. However, scholars who dispute Paul's authorship date the letter to between 70 and 80 AD.[15] In the latter case, the possible location of the authorship could have been within the church of Ephesus itself.Ignatius of Antioch seemed to be very well versed in the epistle to the Ephesians, and mirrors many of his own thoughts in his own epistle to the Ephesians.[15]
Saint Paul, 1740, byVieira Lusitano. The saint is depicted preaching, holding an excerpt from the Epistle to the Ephesians ("avaritia est idolorum servitus",Eph. 5:5) in his left hand.
Ephesians contains:
Ephesians1:1–2. The greeting, from Paul to the church of Ephesus.
Ephesians1:3–2:10. A general account of the blessings that thegospel reveals. This includes the source of these blessings, the means by which they are attained, the reason why they are given, and their final result. The whole of the section Ephesians 1:3–23 consists in the original Greek of just two lengthy and complex sentences.[28] It ends with a ferventprayer for the further spiritual enrichment of the Ephesians.
Ephesians 2:11–3:21. A description of the change in the spiritual position ofGentiles as a result of the work of Christ. It ends with an account of how Paul was selected and qualified to be anapostle to the Gentiles, in the hope that this will keep them from being dispirited and lead him to pray for them.[29]
Ephesians 4:1–16. A chapter on unity in the midst of the diversity of gifts among believers.[30]
Paul's first and hurried visit for the space of three months toEphesus is recorded in Acts 18:19–21. The work he began on this occasion was carried forward byApollos[33] andAquila andPriscilla. On his second visit early in the following year, he remained at Ephesus "three years", for he found it was the key to the western provinces ofAsia Minor. Here "a great door and effectual" was opened to him,[34] and the church was established and strengthened by his diligent labours there.[35] From Ephesus the gospel spread abroad "almost throughout all Asia."[36] The word "mightily grew and prevailed" despite all the opposition and persecution he encountered.
On his last journey toJerusalem, the apostle landed atMiletus and, summoning together the elders of the church from Ephesus, delivered to them a farewell charge,[37] expecting to see them no more.
The following parallels between this epistle and the Milesian charge may be traced:
Acts 20:19[38] = Ephesians 4:2.[39] The phrase "lowliness of mind".
Acts 20:27[40] = Ephesians 1:11.[41] The word "counsel", denoting the divine plan.
Acts 20:32[42] = Ephesians 3:20.[43] The divine ability.
Acts 20:32 = Ephesians 2:20.[44] The building upon the foundation.
Acts 20:32 = Ephesians 1:14,18[45] "The inheritance of the saints."
The purpose of the epistle, and to whom it was written, are matters of much speculation.[46]: 229 It was regarded byC.H. Dodd as the "crown of Paulinism."[46]: 229 In general, it is born out of its particular socio-historical context and the situational context of both the author and the audience. Originating in the circumstance of amulticultural church (primarilyJewish andHellenistic), the author addressed issues appropriate to the diverse religious and cultural backgrounds present in the community.[47]
German inscription of the text, "One Lord, One faith, One baptism," (Ephesians 4:5).
The author exhorts the church repeatedly to embrace a specific view of salvation, which he then explicates.
Frank Charles Thompson[48] argues that the main theme of Ephesians is in response to the newly converted Jews who often separated themselves from their Gentile brethren. The unity of the church, especially between Jew and Gentile believers, is the keynote of the book.
Ephesians is notable for its domestic code treatment in Ephesians 5:22–6:9,[49] covering husband-wife, parent-child, and master-slave relationships. In Ephesians 5:22, wives are urged to submit to their husbands, and husbands to love their wives "as Christ loved the Church."Christian Egalitarian theologians, such asKatharine Bushnell andJessie Penn-Lewis, interpret these commands in the context of the preceding verse,[50] for all Christians to "submit to one another."[51][52] Thus, it is two-way, mutual submission of both husbands to wives and wives to husbands. But according toPeter O'Brien, professor emeritus atMoore Theological College, this would be the only instance of this meaning of submission in the whole New Testament, indeed in any extant comparable Greek texts; by O'Brien's account, the word simply does not connote mutuality.[53]Dallas Theological Seminary professor Daniel Wallace understands it to be an extension of Ephesians 5:15-21[54] on being filled by the Holy Spirit.[10]
^abcEhrman, Bart D. (2004).The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. New York: Oxford. pp. 381–384.ISBN0-19-515462-2.
^Witherington III, Ben (2007).The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
^Foster, Paul 2012,Who Wrote 2 Thessalonians: A Fresh Look at an Old Problem, Journal for the Study of the New Testament , vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 150-175.https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X12462654
^These four views come from Markus Barth, Ephesians: Introduction, Translation, and Commentary on Chapters 1–3 (New York: Doubleday & Co., 1974), 38
^abBruce, F.F.The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Eerdmans, 1984, 1991.ISBN0-8028-2401-3.
^Witherington III, Ben (2007).The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
_fol._157v_Eph_6%2c_8%25E2%2580%259318.jpg)
_fol._142r_-_2_Corinthians_11%2c33-12%2c9.jpg)
_recto_Eph_4%2c_16-29.jpg)
_-_Vieira_Lusitano_(FRESS%2c_Inv._848).png)
