_in_2019.jpg)
Environmental issues in Australia describes a number ofenvironmental issues which affect theenvironment of Australia and are the primary concern of theenvironmental movement in Australia.
There are a range of such issues, some of the relating toconservation in Australia. Others, for example the deteriorating state ofMurray-Darling Basin, have a direct and serious effect on humanland use and the economy. Many human activities including the use ofnatural resources have a direct impact on theAustralian environment and its ecology. AdditionallyAboriginal culture has a strong connection to the land, with some landscape features considered sacred, and as such environmental damage toAustralian Aboriginal sacred sites can also have significant cultural repercussions.
Some of the key issues include:climate change; contamination and pollution;ozone depletion; conservation;invasive species; land degradation; waterway health; urbanisation andmining issues among others.
Climate change has been a critical issue inAustralia since the beginning of the 21st century. Australia is becoming hotter and more prone to extreme heat,bushfires, droughts, floods, and longer fire seasons because of climate change. Climate issues includewildfires,heatwaves,cyclones,rising sea levels, anderosion.[2][3][4][5]
Since the beginning of the 20th century, Australia has experienced an increase of over 1.5 °C in average annual temperatures,[5][6] with warming occurring at twice the rate over the past 50 years compared with the previous 50 years.[7] In 2025, theAustralian Government reported "high confidence" that the global temperature rise "will stabilise some" at the increase of 1.5-3 °C.[8] Recent climate events such as extremely high temperatures and widespread drought have focused government and public attention on the effects ofclimate change in Australia.[9] Rainfall insouthwestern Australia has decreased by 10–20% since the 1970s, while southeastern Australia has also experienced a moderate decline since the 1990s.[5] Rainfall is expected to become heavier and more infrequent, as well as more common in summer rather than in winter. Australia's annual average temperatures are projected to increase 0.4–2.0 °C above 1990 levels by the year 2030, and 1–6 °C by 2070. Average precipitation in the southwest and southeast Australia is projected to decline during this time, while regions such as the northwest may experience increases in rainfall.
Climate change isaffecting the continent's environment and ecosystems. Australia is vulnerable to the effects of global warming projected for the next 50 to 100 years because of its extensive arid and semi-arid areas, and alreadywarm climate, high annual rainfall variability. The continent's high fire risk increases this susceptibility to changes in temperature and climate. Meanwhile, Australia's coastlines will experience erosion and inundation from an estimated 8–88 centimetres (3.1–34.6 in) increase in global sea level. Australia's unique ecosystems such as theGreat Barrier Reef and manyanimal species are also at risk.
Climate change also has diverse implications for Australia's economy,its agriculture and public health.[10] Projected impacts include more severefloods,droughts, and cyclones.[11] Furthermore, Australia's population is highly concentrated in coastal areas at risk from rising sea levels, and existingpressures on water supply will be exacerbated. The exposure ofIndigenous Australians to climate change impacts is exacerbated by existing socio-economic disadvantages which are linked to colonial and post-colonial marginalisation.[2] The communities most affected by climate changes are those in the North whereAboriginal andTorres Strait Islander people make up 30% of the population.[12] Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities located in the coastal north are the most disadvantaged due to social and economic issues and their reliance on traditional land for food, culture, and health. This has raised the question for many community members in these areas, "Should we stay or move away?"[12]
Australia is also a contributor to climate change, with itsgreenhouse gas emissions per capita above the world average. The country ishighly reliant on coal andother fossil fuels, althoughrenewable energy coverage is increasing.[13] Nationalclimate change mitigation efforts include a commitment to achievingnet zero emissions by 2050 under theParis Agreement, although Australia has repeatedly ranked poorly in theClimate Change Performance Index and other international rankings for its climate targets and implementation.Climate change adaptation can be performed at national and local levels[14] and was identified as a priority for Australia in the 2007Garnaut Review.
Climate change has been adivisive or politicised issue inAustralian politics since the 2000s, contributing to successive governments implementing and repealing mitigation policies such ascarbon pricing. SomeAustralian media outlets have promotedclimate misinformation. The issue hassparked protests in support of climate change policies, including some of the largest demonstrations and school strikes in Australia's history.[15][16]
_-_perspective-cropped.jpg)
Australia ranks within the top ten countries globally with respect to greenhouse gas emissions per capita.[17]
The current federal and state governments have all publicly stated their belief that climate change is being caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Vocal minority groups within the population campaign against mining andcoal-fired power stations in Australia, and such demonstrations are widely reported by the mainstream media.[18] Similarly, vocal minority groups concurrently oppose wind energy schemes, despite being 'carbon neutral', on the grounds of local visual and noise impact and concern for the currently high cost and low reliability of wind energy.[19][20][21]
Despite the publication of theGarnaut report and the Green Paper on the proposedCarbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, public belief in anthropogenic climate change has noticeably eroded following the leaking of e-mails from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit.[22][23] Nevertheless recent climate events such as extremely high temperatures and widespread drought have focused government and public attention on the effects.[24]
There is claimed to be a net benefit to Australia in stabilising greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at 450ppm CO2 eq[25] in line with the prevailing political stance. Public disagreement with this opinion is generally dismissed as expression of vested interests, for example from thecoal industry.
Most of Australia's demand for electricity depends upon coal-fired thermal generation,[26] owing to the plentiful indigenous coal supply, limited potential electric generation and political unwillingness to exploit indigenous uranium resources (although Australia accounted for the world's second highest production of uranium in 2005[27] to fuel a 'carbon neutral' domestic nuclear energy program.[28]
Australia does not require its vehicles to meet anyfuel efficiency standards, in spite of its emissions reduction target under theParis Agreement.[29]
Australia is affected by significant contamination and pollution includingsoil andgoundwater contamination as well aswater andair pollution. Researchers currently estimate that between 16,000 and 80,000 significantly sites have been identified as affected by up to 7,500 different contaminants.[30][31] Some of these are toxic byproducts of government land use and private industry. The country has several notable exclusion zones due to heavy contamination. Some substances have significant half-lifes, making remediation and sequestering expensive and complicated. There is also a serious ongoing risk of contamination incidents particularly from mining-related activities.
Significant types of contamination affecting Australia include:
Due to its position in the Southern Hemisphere close to Antarctica, Australia is one of the parts of the world most affected by ozone depletion, which results in dangerous increases to solar radiation, particularlyultraviolet radiation.[57] Increased UV levels compromise the genetic integrity and immune systems of living organisms,[58] impairs photosynthesis, contributes to climate change,[58] and to one of the highest mortality rates of skin cancer in the world.[59] It is generally believed that theMontreal Protocol (1987) has helped alleviate anthropogenic ozone depletion by banning destructivechlorofluorocarbon emissions, and this has helped protect Australia from exposure to catastrophic levels of UV radiation. Though the "hole" in the ozone which the Protocol sought to prevent has not reached Australia, it has experienced significant sustained thinning at its latitudes, causing elevated levels of solar irradiation.[60] Increased incidence of large scale bushfires in Australia has contributed to recent ozone depletion, contributing to a sort of solar irradiation feedback loop.[61][62][63][64]
Conservation in Australia is an issue of state and federal policy. Australia is one of the most biologically diverse countries in the world, with a large portion of species endemic to Australia. Preserving this wealth ofbiodiversity is important for future generations.
In Australiaforest cover is around 17% of the total land area, equivalent to 134,005,100 hectares (ha) of forest in 2020, up from 133,882,200 hectares (ha) in 1990. In 2020, naturally regenerating forest covered 131,614,800 hectares (ha) and planted forest covered 2,390,300 hectares (ha). Of the naturally regenerating forest 0% was reported to beprimary forest (consisting of native tree species with no clearly visible indications of human activity) and around 18% of the forest area was found within protected areas. For the year 2015, 67% of the forest area was reported to be underpublic ownership, 32%private ownership and 1% with ownership listed as other or unknown.[65][66]
A key conservation issue is the preservation of biodiversity, especially by protecting the remaining rainforests. The destruction of habitat by human activities, including land clearing, remains the major cause ofbiodiversity loss in Australia. The importance of the Australian rainforests to the conservation movement is very high.[67] Australia is the only western country to have large areas of rainforest intact. Forests provide timber, drugs, and food and should be managed to maximise the possible uses. Currently, there are a number of environmental movements and campaigners advocating for action on saving the environment, one such campaign is the Big Switch.
Land management issues including clearance of native vegetation, reafforestation of once-cleared areas, control of exotic weeds and pests, expansion of dryland salinity, acid sulphate soils,<[68], and changed fire regimes. Intensification of resource use in sectors such as forestry, fisheries, and agriculture are widely reported to contribute to biodiversity loss in Australia. Coastal and marine environments also have reduced biodiversity from reduced water quality caused by pollution and sediments arising from human settlements and agriculture. In central New South Wales where there are large plains of grassland, problems have risen from—unusual to say—lack of land clearing.
TheDaintree Rainforest, a tropical rainforest nearDaintree, Queensland covering around 1200 square kilometres, is threatened by logging, development, mining and the effects of the high tourist numbers.
There are some government programs in Australia which are the opposite of conservation (such as killing wildlife); an example of this isshark culling, which currently occurs inNew South Wales andQueensland.[69][70]
Over a hundred species of fauna are currently under serious threat of extinction. The plight of some of these species receives more attention than others and recently the focus of many conservation organisations has been the critically endangerednorthern hairy-nosed wombat, the endangeredTasmanian devil,[71] northerntiger quoll, south easternred-tailed black cockatoo,southern cassowary, Tasmanianwedge-tailed eagle,Leadbeater's possum andsouthern corroboree frog.
Australia has a poor record of conservation of native fauna. The extinction ofAustralian megafauna is partially attributed to the arrival of humans and since European settlement, 23 birds, 4 frogs, and 27 mammal species are also known to have become extinct.
One of the notable issues withmarine conservation in Australia is the protection of theGreat Barrier Reef. The Great Barrier Reef's environmental pressures include water quality from runoff, climate change and mass coral bleaching, cyclic outbreaks of the crown-of-thorns starfish, overfishing, and shipping accidents. The government of Queensland currently killssharks in the Great Barrier Reef usingdrum lines, causing damage to themarine ecosystem.[72]
In 2021Australia announced the creation of 2 national marine parks in size of 740,000 square kilometres. With those parks 45% of the Australian marine territory will be protected.[73]
Whaling in Australia took place fromcolonisation in 1788. In 1979 Australia terminated whaling and committed to whale protection. The main varieties hunted werehumpback,blue,right andsperm whales.[74]
Western Australia culled sharks in 2014, killing dozens oftiger sharks and causing public protest.[75] Later that year it was abandoned, and the government of Western Australia continued to shoot and kill sharks it believed to be an "imminent threat" to humans from 2014 to 2017;[76][77] this policy was criticised by senator Rachel Siewart for being environmentally damaging.[78]
From 1962 to the present, the government ofQueensland haskilled sharks ondrum lines andshark nets, a process that also kills other animals such asdolphins[79] anddugongs.[80] From 1962 to 2018, Queensland's "shark control" program killed roughly 50,000 sharks, including sharks in theGreat Barrier Reef.[69][72] Queensland's shark-killing program has been called "outdated, cruel and ineffective".[72]
New South Wales has ashark net program that kills sharks as well as other marine life.[81] Between 1950 and 2008, 352 tiger sharks and 577 great white sharks were killed in the nets in New South Wales – also during this period, a total of 15,135 marine animals were killed in the nets, including whales and turtles.[70] There has been a very large decrease in the number of sharks in eastern Australia in recent years, and the shark-killing programs in Queensland and New South Wales are partly responsible for this decrease.[69]
Jessica Morris ofHumane Society International callsshark culling a "knee-jerk reaction" and says, "sharks are top order predators that play an important role in the functioning of marine ecosystems. We need them for healthy oceans."[82]
While there have been nooil spill environmental disasters of the scale of theExxon Valdez in the country, Australia has a large oil industry and there have been several large oil spills[1]. Spills remain a serious threat to the marine environment and Australian coastline. The largest spill to date was theKirki tanker in 1991 which dropped 17,280 tonnes of oil off the coast ofWestern Australia.
In March 2009, the2009 southeast Queensland oil spill occurred, where 200,000 litres were spilled from theMV Pacific Adventurer spilling more than 250 tonnes of oil, 30 tonnes of fuel and other toxic chemicals on Brisbane's suburban beaches. PremierAnna Bligh described the spill as "worst environmental disaster Queensland has ever seen".[83]
A serious issue to the Australian marine environment is the dumping of rubbish from ships. There have been a number of cases,[84] particularly involving the navy of Australian and other countries polluting Australian waters including the dumping ofchemical warfare agents. Recently documented cases include the aircraft carrierUSS Ronald Reagan in 2006 which was found to be dumping rubbish off the shores ofMoreton Island.[85] In Victoria, a large number of toxic drums containing1,2-Dichlorobenzene xylenol, a substance very toxic to aquatic creatures washed up on beaches during May 2009 presumably fallen off a passing container ship.[86]
Australia's geographical isolation has resulted in the evolution of many delicate ecological relationships that are sensitive to foreign invaders and in many instances provided no natural predators for many of the species subsequently introduced.[citation needed] The introduction and prolific breeding of animal species such as thecane toad (Rhinella marina) andrabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) had greatly disrupted native species populations.[87][88] Introduced species in Australia are problematic in that they may outcompete or, in the case of the can toad,red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and feral domestic cats (Felis catus), directly kill native species.Rabbits in Australia along with feral beasts of burden disrupt native species by destroying vulnerable habitat requiring drastic pest-exclusion measures such as theRabbit-proof fence.[89]The cane toad invasion is particularly concerning due to them having few predators and apart from extensively outcompeting native species[90] their toxicity kills thousands of nativeapex predators each year.[91] The threat of the ongoing cane toad invasion has seen the establishment of a national taskforce despite its potential range being limited to thenorth of the continent.[92] Likewise Tasmania takes the threat of the species so seriously that it has a government sponsored taskforce to prevent fox populations from taking hold on the island.[93] The species has single-handedly caused the extinction of several native species on the mainland.[94]
Australia is also vulnerable to invasive weeds. Controlling the invasion ofprickly pears in Australia is one of the success stories of invasive species control. The government maintains aWeeds of National Significance (WONS) list of problematic plant species.[95]
According toJared Diamond, "Australia's number-one environmental problem [is]land degradation".[96] Land degradation results from nine types of damaging environmental impacts:[96]
.jpg)
.jpg)
Clearcutting ofold growth forests is continuing in parts of Australia primarily in the eastern states of Tasmania, Victoria and New South Wales. This often involves the destruction of natural ecosystems and the replacement with monoculture plantations.
Australia had a 2018Forest Landscape Integrity Index mean score of 7.22/10, ranking it 46th globally out of 172 countries.[97]
In theprehistory of Australia theIndigenous Australians usedfire-stick farming which was an early form of land clearing which caused long term changes to the ecology. With European colonisation land clearing continued on a larger scale for agriculture – particularly for cattle, cotton and wheat production. Since European settlement a total of 13% of native vegetation cover has been lost. The extinction of 20 different mammals, 9 bird and 97 plant species have been partially attributed to land clearing. Land clearing is a major source of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions, and contributed to approximately 12 percent of Australia's total emissions in 1998.
The consequences of land clearing includedryland salinity andsoil erosion. These are a major concern to thelandcare movement in Australia. Soil salinity affects 50,000 km2 of Australia and is predominantly due to land clearance.
The clearing of native vegetation is controlled by Federal laws (indirectly), State law and local planning instruments. The precise details of regulation of vegetation clearing differ according to the location where clearing is proposed.
The protection of waterways in Australia is a major concern for various reasons including habitat and biodiversity, but also due to use of the waterways by humans.
TheMurray-Darling Basin is under threat due toirrigation in Australia, causing high levels of salinity which affect agriculture and biodiversity inNew South Wales,Victoria andSouth Australia. These rivers are also affected by pesticide run-off and drought. Low oxygen levels in the water combined with high temperatures has led tofish kills in the Darling River in 2018, 2019 and 2023.[98] The worst was in March 2023 in which millions of dead bony bream, golden perch silver perch and some Murray cod flowed down the river.[98]
Rivers and creeks in urban areas also faceenvironmental issues, particularly pollution.
.jpg)
Australia is one of the most urbanised countries in the world. Many Australian cities have large urban footprints and are characterised by an unsustainable low densityurban sprawl. This places demand on infrastructure and services which contributes to the problems of land clearing, pollution, transport related emissions, energy consumption, invasive species,automobile dependency andurban heat islands.
The urban sprawl continues to increase at a rapid rate in most Australian cities, particularly the state capital cities, all of which (with the exception ofHobart) aremetropoleis. In some centres, such asSydney andGreater Western Sydney,[116]Greater Melbourne[117] andSouth East Queensland[118] large metropolitanconurbations threaten to extend for hundreds of kilometres and based on current population growth rates are expected to becomemegacities in the 21st century. Most Australian cities population growth is a result ofmigration in contrast to thebirth rate and fertility rate in Australia, which is contributing to the ongoing trend ofurbanisation.
In recent years, some cities have implementedtransit-oriented development strategies to curb the urban sprawl. Notable examples includeMelbourne 2030,[119]South East Queensland Regional Plan and theSydney Metropolitan Strategy. There are also populationdecentralisation programs at state and federal levels aimed at shifting populations out of the major centres and stemming the drivers to rapid urbanisation.Albury-Wodonga was part of the federal government's program of decentralisation begun in the 1970s, which has at times had relocation policies for immigration. The Victorian government has run a decentralisation program since the 1960s, having had a ministerial position appointed and ongoing promotional and investment programs for stimulating growth in Regional Victoria. However policy has swung over the decades, primarily due to local development priorities and agendas and a lack of federal co-ordination to the problem.
Issues include large quantities of e-waste and toxic waste going intolandfill. Australia does not have restrictions on the dumping of toxic materials that are common in other countries, such as dumpingcathode-ray tubes which leach heavy metals into water catchments. Due to the lack of sufficient sites for toxic waste disposal large quantities of toxic waste are trucked between states to remote dumping grounds or exported overseas in ships.[120]
.jpg)
Australia has some of the largest mining operations in the southern hemisphere and is a major exporter of several resources that have significant environmental effects, most notably coal and uranium.
Australia has the largest reserves ofuranium in the world and there has been a number ofenquiries on uranium mining. Theanti-nuclear movement in Australia actively opposes mining and seeks to prevent the construction of nuclear power plants.[121]
At least 150 leaks, spills and licence breaches occurred at the Ranger uranium mine between 1981 and 2009.[122]
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg) | This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(March 2009) |
The following is a list of development projects that have been controversial due to concerns of environmental effects. This list includes projects required to submit an Environmental Effects Statement.
| Project/Area affected | Activity | State | Began | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wittenoom | Crocidolite (asbestos) mining | Western Australia | 1938 | Now a prohibited area (exclusion zone) known as the Wittenoom Prohibited Area.[123] Widespread contamination causing thousands of cancers (includingmesothelioma) and many hundreds of deaths.[124] In addition to widespread contamination about half the material mined byAustralian Blue Asbestos was distributed throughout Australia resulting in an ongoing public health crisis.[125] Australia banned use of asbestos in 2003.[126] |
| Northampton | Lead mining | Western Australia | 1954 | Lead tailing contamination, leaching into waterways, encapsulation and extensive cleanup[127][128] |
| British nuclear tests at Maralinga | Nuclear testing | South Australia | 1955 | Massiveradioactive contamination. Continual cleanup operations. Long-term health effects on local Indigenous tribes and former personnel. Now part of a prohibited area (exclusion zone) known as theWoomera Prohibited Area. |
| Kings Park | Clearing | Western Australia | 1956 | Clearing of urban bushland to build a swimming pool and car park. A campaign by a coalition of scientific, naturalist and heritage groups prevented it from going ahead.[129] |
| Mounts Bay | Infilling | Western Australia | 1963 | Infilling of theSwan River to create land for freeway construction. This was opposed by the Citizens' Committee for the Protection of Kings Park and the Swan River.[129] |
| Kelly's Bush | Clearing | New South Wales | 1970 | Clearing of urban bushland for suburban development. The area was protected after theNSW Builders' Labourers' Federation (BLF) placed a 'green ban' on the site.[130] |
| Blackbutt Nature Reserve | Clearing | New South Wales | 1973 | Clearing ofNewcastle bushland for the construction of an expressway. Work was halted by a BLF green ban and the area subsequently protected.[131] |
| Riley's Island | Clearing | New South Wales | 1973 | Clearing of native habitat for suburban development. A BLF green ban halted work and the area was made a nature reserve in 1989.[131] |
| Port Kembla Beach | Clearing, dredging | New South Wales | 1974 | Dredging for sandmining and clearing for property development. Halted by South Coast Labour Council and BLF work bans.[131] |
| Terania Creek | Logging | New South Wales | 1979 | Logging of old growth rainforest. After four weeks of blockading, a moratorium was placed on work and a government inquiry subsequently held, after which the area was added to the newly createdNightcap National Park.[132][133] |
| Middle Head Beach | Sand mining | New South Wales | 1980 | Destruction of beach and sacred sites by industrial dredging. Following months of blockading the neighbouring beach at Grassy Head beach was spared and the NSW government granted no more beach sand mining leases after 1980.[134] |
| Ranger uranium mine | Uranium mining | Northern Territory | 1980 | Possible contamination of land with radioactive minetailings.Ranger mine contained withinKakadu National Park.[121] |
| Nightcap rainforest | Logging | New South Wales | 1982 | Logging of old growth rainforest at Grier's Scrub and Mount Nardi. Following blockading, work was halted at the latter and the area later made part of theNightcap National Park.[132] |
| Broken Hill | Uranium mining | New South Wales | 1982 | Potential radioactive toxicity and damage to habitat due to mine leaks. The proposedHoneymoon uranium mine was delayed for almost 20 years by campaigns involving unions, traditional owners and environmentalists. It opened in 2011 but then closed in 2013 due to a decline in demand for uranium.[134] |
| Franklin Dam | Damming | Tasmania | 1983 | Damming of forested area, watercourse damage, reduced water flow. Catalyst for the foundation of theAustralian Greens. The project was cancelled by the Hawke federal ALP government in 1983, following a three month blockade of clearing and over 1000 arrests.[135] |
| Daintree rainforest | Road building | Queensland | 1983 | Clearing of rainforest in a national park to build a track. Threat of increased development. Track was pushed through in 1984 but quickly deteriorated and was not refurbished after the area was granted World Heritage status.[132] |
| Roxby Downs | Uranium mining | South Australia | 1983 | Possible contamination of land with radioactive mine tailings. Mine construction was disrupted by blockades in 1983 and 1984 before opening in 1988.[136] |
| Farmhouse Creek | Road building, logging | Tasmania | 1986 | Clearing to build a road to facilitate the logging of old growth forest. Opposed by a blockade using Australia's first tree sit platform. Following further blockading, parts of the area were eventually granted protection after a federal government inquiry.[134] |
| Mount Etna | Mining | Queensland | 1987 | Destruction oflittle bent-wing bat breeding habitat through the blasting of caves to enable limestone mining. A blockade led to mining being halted for six months but in 1988 the caves were destroyed.[132] |
| Washpool | Roadbuilding, Logging | New South Wales | 1989 | Road construction to enable the logging of old growth forest. Blockading held up the project before a court injunction stopped work due to the presence of Aboriginal sacred sites. The area gained protection the following year after another injunction was gained due to illegal logging and faults with an Environmental Impact Statement. It was added to theWashpool National Park in 1999.[132] |
| Mount Royal | Logging | New South Wales | 1989 | Logging of old growth habitat in a state forest. Following protest action work was stopped by a court injunction. The area was added to theMount Royal National Park in 1997.[132] |
| Chaelundi | Logging | New South Wales | 1990 | Logging of old growth forest. Work was blockaded and then halted after theNSW Forestry Commission was ordered to undertake an Environment Impact Statement. When logging was resumed in 1991 it was disrupted by blockaders until a further court injunction stopped work. A further attempt to log was prevented by direct action in 1994 and the area subsequently made anational park.[132] |
| Fraser Island (K'gari) | Logging | Queensland | 1990 | Logging of old growth forest. Blockading disrupted work and in 1991 a government inquiry report led to logging being phased out. The island was later accordedWorld Heritage status.[132] |
| Brown Mountain | Logging | Victoria | 1990 | Logging of old growth forest, which was disrupted by blockaders and then suspended for three years. Logging was later resumed leading to another blockade in 2009.[132] |
| Mount Killiekrankie | Logging | New South Wales | 1990 | Logging of old growth forest. Work was blockaded until it was stopped due to theNSW Forestry Commission being prosecuted for polluting theBellinger River. The area was added to theNew England National Park in 1999.[132] |
| Mummel Gulf | Logging | New South Wales | 1992 | Logging of old growth forest. A three month long blockade prevented cutting. TheMummel Gulf National Park and Mummel Gulf State Conservation Area were created in 1999.[132] |
| Wild Cattle Creek | Logging | New South Wales | 1992 | Logging of old growth forest. Despite two blockades most of the area was logged by 1994. The area was later added to theCascade National Park.[132] |
| Exit Caves | Mining | Tasmania | 1992 | Mining for limestone within aWorld Heritage area and its effects on a 21 kilometre long cave system. Following protests blasting was halted by the federal government but mining continued until the Bender Limestone quarry was closed in 1994.[132] |
| Dingo and Bulgar Forests | Logging | New South Wales | 1993 | Logging of old growth forest. Blockading disrupted work. Sections were later added to theTapin Tops National Park.[132] |
| Cairns andKuranda | Clearing | Queensland | 1993 | Clearing ofWorld Heritage listed rainforest as part of construction of the 7.5 kilometreSkyrail Rainforest Cableway.[132] |
| Yarra Valley | Logging | Victoria | 1993 | Deforestation, threatening of a major water catchment, threatening the endangeredLeadbeater's possum. |
| Hinchinbrook Island | Clearing and dredging | Queensland | 1994 | Bulldozing and dredging ofmangroves for a tourist development. Blockading disrupted work but the marina was completed.[132] |
| Kerr Forest | Logging | Western Australia | 1994 | Logging of old growth forest. Work was disrupted by 30Balingup residents before litigation resulted in an injunction being placed on logging.[132] |
| Whian Whian State Forest | Logging | New South Wales | 1994 | Old growth forest logging. Blockading stalled work until 1997 when the contractor agreed to withdraw from the area. It was made part of theNightcap National Park the following year.[132] |
| M2 Motorway | Clearing | New South Wales | 1995 | Clearing of urban bushland inSydney includingAboriginal sacred sites and 100 000 trees. Construction was opposed by protesters using lockons, treesits and site occupations.[132] |
| Nullum State Forest | Logging | New South Wales | 1995 | Old growth forest logging. Following a blockade by local residents and the Byron Bay Environment Centre theForestry Corporation of New South Wales was fined $25,000 for breaches of the Pollution Control Act. The area was later added toMount Jerusalem National Park.[132] |
| Jane Block | Logging | Western Australia | 1995 | Old growth forest logging. Work was disrupted by a blockade before litigation protected the remaining stands of forest from logging.[132] |
| Iron Gates,Evans Head | Development | New South Wales | 1997 | Destruction of beach andAboriginal sacred sites for suburban development. Following blockading and litigation clearing was put on hold. The developer, who later went bankrupt, was ordered to rehabilitate the site.[132] |
| Barmah-Millewa | Logging, stock grazing | Victoria | 1998 | Destruction ofred river gum habitat by logging and poor farming practices. The issue had been a major one for traditional owners and environmentalists for some years but the two came together in the late 1990s and increased their campaigning efforts. In 2008 the Victorian government placed 91,000 hectares under protection and agreed to co-management with traditional owners.[137] |
| Jabiluka | Clearing,uranium mining | Northern Territory | 1998 | Clearing and toxicity risks associated with the construction of a uranium mine. Traditional owners called for nonviolent direct action against construction and this eventually involved 5000 people. They also refused to grant use of their land. Following campaigning and court casesRio Tinto cancelled the project in 2001 and later engaged in rehabilitation works.[138] |
| Tiwi Islands | Deforestation and woodchipping | Northern Territory | 2001 | Deforestation approved by theHoward government. Operators significantly breached environmental laws resulting in excessive irreparable land clearing.[139] |
| Nowingi toxic waste proposal | Toxic waste | Victoria | 2004 | Toxic waste disposal plant. Threat to surrounding settlements,Murray River and environment. |
| Bell Bay Pulp Mill | Logging | Tasmania | 2006 | Deforestation. Threatening of old growth forests in theTamar Valley. Claims effluent could harm Bass Strait marine life. |
| Styx Valley | Logging and woodchipping | Tasmania | 2006 | Deforestation. Destruction of old growth forests. |
| Wonthaggi desalination plant | Desalination | Victoria | 2007 | Uneconomic. Pollution of the Bass Coast. Accusations of government/private entity corruption. Lack of consultation with community. No justification for perceived requirement. Insufficient initial assessment. Insufficient EES. |
| Port Phillip Channel Deepening Project | Dredging | Victoria | 2008 | Dredging inheavy metal-laiden shipping ports posed contamination concerns. Destruction of marine environments. Catalyst for the foundation of theBlue Wedges community group. |
| Walmadan/James Price Point | Clearing | Western Australia | 2011 | Habitat destruction through the construction of a 30 km gas refinery site. A protest camp bringing together First Nations community members, environmentalists and others disrupted preliminary work beforeWoodside abandoned the project. The WA Supreme Court subsequently found that the environmental approvals originally enabling it to go ahead were illegal.[134][140] |
| Leard State forest | Clearing | New South Wales | 2012 | Clearing of forest habitat for construction of theMaules Creek coal mine. Work was disrupted by nonviolent direct action.[141] |
| Beeliar Wetlands | Clearing | Western Australia | 2016 | Clearing of wetlands habitat andAboriginal sacred sites for tollway construction. Following a blockade involving over 1000 people the project was cancelled.[134] |
| Oyster Point | Land use | Queensland | ||
| Magellan Metals | Lead poisoning | |||
| Carmichael coal mine | Coal mining | Queensland | 2019 | potential impact upon theGreat Barrier Reef,groundwater at its site and itscarbon emissions.[142] |
| Brigalow Land Development Fitzroy Basin Scheme | Clearing | Queensland | 1962 | 4.5Mha ofBrigalow vegetation was cleared for cropping and grazing. The brigalow cleared accounted for 21% of all brigalow vegetation in Australia. This scheme caused major runoff into catchments.[143]. Only 10% of this vegetation remains today with clearing still continuing at a lesser extent.[144]. |
Australia portal
Climate change portal
Ecology portal
Environment portal
Renewable energy portal
Water portalThese glimpses suggest that it is in Australia's interest to seek the strongest feasible global mitigation outcomes – 450 ppm as currently recommended by the science advisers to the UNFCCC and accepted by the European Union.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)