According to some scholars, anational identity of the English as the people or ethnic group dominant inEngland can be traced to theAnglo-Saxon period. For Lindy Brady and Marc Morris,Bede'sEcclesiastical History of the English People and the construction ofOffa's Dyke exemplifies the establishment of such an identity as early as AD 731, becoming a national identity with the unification of theKingdom of England in the ninth and tenth centuries, and changing status once again in the eleventh century after theNorman Conquest, whenEnglishry came to be the status of the subject indigenous population.[1][2] Similarly,Adrian Hastings considers England to be the oldest example of a "mature nation", and links the development of this nationhood to theChristian Church and spread of written popular languages to existing ethnic groups.[3]
In contrast,John Breuilly rejects the notion these examples constituted "national" identity and criticizes the assumption that continued usage of a term such as 'English' means continuity in its meaning.[4]Patrick J. Geary agrees, arguing names were adapted to different circumstances by different powers and could convince people of continuity, even if radical discontinuity was the lived reality.[5] Geary also rejects the conflation of early medieval and contemporary group identities as a myth, arguing it is a mistake to conclude continuity based on the recurrence of names and that historians fail to recognize the differences between earlier ways of perceiving group identities and more contemporary attitudes, stating they are "trapped in the very historical process we are attempting to study".[6] Krishan Kumar also points out that Bede's 'English' did not refer to a unified people, but rather "still diverse groups of Angles, Saxons, Jutes and others with distinct ethnicities".[7]
From the eighteenth century, the terms 'English' and 'British' began to be seen as interchangeable to many of the English.[8] While the officialUnited Kingdom census does record ethnicity, English/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish/British is a single tick-box under the "White" heading for the answer to the ethnicity question asked in England and Wales (while making the distinction ofwhite Irish).[9][10]
English identity emerged from theAnglo-Saxon period after the fall ofRoman Britain, with the unification of various kingdoms under figures likeAlfred the Great in the 9th century. TheNorman Conquest in 1066 layered Norman influences onto this Germanic base, shaping the language, governance, and culture. Over centuries, events like theMagna Carta (1215), theEnglish Reformation (16th century), and theIndustrial Revolution (18th-19th centuries) fostered a narrative of individualism, parliamentary democracy, and innovation as hallmarks of Englishness. Although Englishness andBritishness are used synonymously in some contexts,[11] the two terms are not identical, and the relation of each to the other is complex. Englishness is often a response to different national identities within Britain, such asScottishness, Irishness,Welshness andCornishness.[12]
Culturally, English identity is often linked to symbols and traditions: theEnglish language (a global lingua franca), tea-drinking, the monarchy, Shakespeare, theBBC, and sports likecricket andfootball. The countryside—rolling hills, villages, and pubs—also plays a big role in the romanticised self-image, contrasting with urban centers like London, a global melting pot. Socially, English identity is tied to values like "fair play," politeness, understatement, and a dry sense of humor—think "stiff upper lip" or queuing etiquette. Notions of "fair play," parliamentary democracy, and a certain understated stoicism have been linked to English self-perception. The monarchy, though a British institution, is often tied to English tradition through landmarks like Westminster or Windsor. Tea-drinking, pub culture, cricket, football, rugby, and events like theLast Night of the Proms orGuy Fawkes Night contribute to a shared cultural fabric.
Sometimes Englishness is thought to be encapsulated in terms of a particular relation to sport:fair play, for instance. Arguably, England's "national games" are football and, particularly,cricket. As cricket historian Dominic Malcolm argues, the link between cricket and England's national identity became solidified through literature. Works such asJames Love'sCricket: an heroic poem andMary Mitford'sOur Village, along withNyren'sThe Cricketers of My Time andPycroft'sThe Cricket Field, purported to identify the characteristics of cricket with the notional characteristics of English society, such as pragmatism, integrity, and independence.[13]
English identity has shifted significantly in recent centuries. The British Empire’s peak saw Englishness intertwined with imperial pride, but its decline afterWorld War II prompted a reevaluation. England’s population is diverse, with immigration from former colonies, Europe, and beyond reshaping urban centers like London, Manchester, and Liverpool. This has led to tensions and discussions about what "Englishness" means in a globalised, multiethnic society. Some associate it with rural nostalgia—rolling hills, villages, and cream teas—while others see it as urban, dynamic, and cosmopolitan.