| Canberra | |
|---|---|
.jpg) Canberra T.4WJ874 in 2005. It had been painted in 1999 to represent the first prototypeVN799, first flown in 1949. | |
| General information | |
| Type | Bomber/Reconnaissance |
| National origin | United Kingdom |
| Manufacturer | English Electric |
| Status | Retired |
| Primary users | Royal Air Force |
| Number built | |
| History | |
| Introduction date | 25 May 1951 |
| First flight | 13 May 1949 |
| Retired | 23 June 2006 (RAF), 11 May 2007 (IAF) |
| Developed into | Martin B-57 Canberra |
TheEnglish Electric Canberra is a British first-generation, jet-poweredmedium bomber. It was developed byEnglish Electric during the mid- to late 1940s in response to a 1944Air Ministry requirement for a successor to the wartimede Havilland Mosquito fast bomber. Among the performance requirements for the type was an outstanding high-altitude bombing capability and high speed. These were partly accomplished by making use of newly developed jet-propulsion technology. When the Canberra was introduced to service with theRoyal Air Force (RAF), the type's first operator, in May 1951, it became the service's first jet-powered bomber.
In February 1951, a Canberra set another world record when it became the first jet aircraft to make a nonstoptransatlantic flight. Throughout most of the 1950s, the Canberra could fly at a higher altitude than any other aircraft in the world, and in 1957, a Canberra established aworld altitude record of 70,310 feet (21,430 m). Due to its ability to evade the earlyjetinterceptor aircraft, and its significant performance advancement over contemporarypiston-engined bombers, the Canberra became a popular aircraft on the export market, being procured for service in the air forces of many nations both inside and outside of theCommonwealth of Nations. The type was alsolicence-produced in Australia byGovernment Aircraft Factories (GAF) and in the US byMartin as theB-57 Canberra. The latter produced both the slightly modified B-57A Canberra and the significantly updated B-57B.
In addition to being a tacticalnuclear strike aircraft, the Canberra proved to be highly adaptable, serving in varied roles such astactical bombing andphotographic andelectronicreconnaissance. Canberras served throughout theCold War, in theSuez Crisis,Vietnam War,Falklands War,Indo-Pakistani wars, and numerous African conflicts. In several wars, each of the opposing sides had Canberras in its air force.
The Canberra served for more than 50 years with some operators. In June 2006, the RAF retired the last three of its Canberras 57 years after its first flight. Three of the Martin B-57 variant remain in service, performingmeteorological and re-entry tracking work forNASA, as well as providing electronic communication (Battlefield Airborne Communications Node) testing for deployment toAfghanistan.[2][3][needs update]
During the Second World War, a desperate demand for bomber aircraft led to many aircraft being produced by secondary manufacturers vialicensed manufacturing arrangements. The English Electric company thus mass-produced thousands of piston-engined bombers, such as theHandley Page Hampden andHandley Page Halifax, and the firm became a well-established British aircraft manufacturer despite having little internal design experience.[4]Sir George Nelson, the chairman of English Electric, decided that the company would seek to remain in the business and produce its own designs. In November 1943, the company was invited to participate in discussions over a prospective bomber that would take advantage of the newly developed jet propulsion technology.[5]
In 1944,Westland Aircraft's technical director and chief designerW. E. W. Petter had prepared a design study for a twin-engined fighter-bomber, the P.1056, based on two fuselage-mountedMetrovick F.2/4 "Beryl" engines. The aircraft used a relatively conventional aerodynamic design, Petter having determined that the necessary performance could be attained without adoptingswept wings or a swept tail.[6] The authorities doubted its suitability for operations from unprepared fields and at low altitude, but could see its potential as a bomber design; numerous manufacturers refused to take on the design.[7][8] Petter left Westland to join the English Electric company in December 1944, where he was appointed by Nelson to form a design team and encouraged to develop his design.[8] In 1945, English Electric formalised its own in-house aircraft design team to pursue this design.[4][5]
The Canberra had its formal origins in a 1944 requirement issued by the Air Ministry for a successor to thede Havilland Mosquito. This requirement, the initial revision beingE.3/45, sought a high-altitude,high-speedbomber, which was to be equipped with no defensive armament. According to aviation historiansBill Gunston and Peter Gilchrist, Air Ministry officials are alleged to have had difficulty defining what they sought for the proposed type, which led to several revisions of the requirement.[9] Further specification refinements, including B.3/45 and B.5/47, issued further details such as a three-man crew and other features such as a visual bombing capability. Several British aircraft manufacturers submitted proposals to meet the requirement, including English Electric. The firm was among those companies to beshort-listed to proceed with development studies.[4]
By June 1945, the aircraft that was to become the Canberra bore many similarities to the eventual design, despite the placement of a single, centrally mounted turbojet engine; Petter had held discussions withRolls-Royce Ltd on the topic of the development of a scaled-up derivative of theNene engine.[6] In late 1945, the design was modified further with a pair of engines being adopted, instead, initially to be set in the wing roots and later to be mounted in a midwing position; this change was made principally due tocentre of gravity issues imposed by the position and weight of a heavy bombload and centrally mounted single engine.[6][10] The new engine position decreased the aircraft's weight by 13% and improved the aircraft's centre of gravity, as well as improved accessibility to the engines and related accessories; its downsides were slight thrust loss from the longer jet pipes and greateryaw during engine-out instances.[6]
During the early stages of design, the aircraft had grown from being roughly the same size as the Mosquito to being around double its weight.[6][clarification needed] Although jet-powered, the Canberra design philosophy was very much in the Mosquito mould, providing room for a substantial bomb load, fitting two of the most powerful engines available, and wrapping it in the most compact and aerodynamic package possible, an example being a leading edge formed of a single sheet of light alloy wrapped around to 40% of chord, sitting onRedux-bonded stiffeners through which the ribs were passed, the panels secured with adjustable eye-bolts, enabling a highly accurate wing profile to be maintained from the leading edge to main spar without any external joints or fastenings.[11] Also in line with the Mosquito philosophy, the Canberra by design dispensed with defensive armament, which had historically proven unequal tofighter aircraft, and the resulting performance gain permitted the Canberra to avoid air-to-air combat entirely.[12]
On 7 January 1946, theMinistry of Supply placed a contract for the development and production of four English Electric A.1 aircraft.[13] It continued to be known as the English Electric A.1 until it was given the name "Canberra" after the capital of Australia in January 1950 by Sir George Nelson, chairman of English Electric, as Australia had become the aircraft's first export customer.[14]
The Air Ministry specification B.3/45 had requested the production of four prototypes. On 9 January 1946, English Electric received a contract to produce four prototypes, which received theSociety of British Aerospace Companies designationA.1; work commenced on the construction of these prototype aircraft in that same year, which were all built on production jigs.[6][15] Progress was slow, however, due to several factors, such as the protracted development of the Avon engine that powered the type; in October 1947, in response to Rolls-Royce's difficulties, English Electric elected to have the second prototype modified to use the existing Nene engine in place of the Avon.[6] The implementation of postwar military cutbacks also served to slow development.[16]
Another external issue that affected development was the failure of theTelecommunications Research Establishment to produce theradar bombing system for the aircraft in a timely fashion. This required a redesign in 1947, changing the aircraft's nose to accommodate a glazed tip for visual bombing by a bomb aimer, which in turn required the cockpit to be restructured to facilitate the ejection system of the additional crewmember.[17] In 1948, the design team relocated toWarton Aerodrome, Lancashire, establishing a flight-test organisation and assembly facilities there.[6]
Ultimately, the first of these prototypes, VN799, conducted itsmaiden flight on 13 May 1949.[16] Piloted byRoland Beamont, the aircraft is claimed to have handled well, with the exception ofrudder overbalance. This initial flight was flown with Avon engines, the decision to perform the type's first flight with the Avon-equipped first prototype or the Nene-equipped second prototype,VN828, was not made until weeks beforehand.[18] On 9 November 1949, the second prototype, VN828, the first to be equipped with the Nene engine, performed its first flight. The third and fourth followed within the following eight weeks.[19]
Flight testing of the prototypes proved to be vice-free and required only a few modifications. The changes included the installation of a glazed nose to accommodate a bomb-aimer, due to the advancedH2S Mk9 bombing radar being unavailable for production, the turbojet engines were replaced by more powerfulRolls-Royce Avon R.A.3s, and distinctive teardrop-shaped fuel tanks were fitted under the wingtips.[16] Refinements were also made following early flight testing to the rudder andelevator to reduce instances ofbuffeting, after which it is claimed that the Canberra handled much like a fighter, proving to be atypically manoeuvrable for a bomber.[20]
The project had found considerable support from the government in the late 1940s. In March 1949, in advance of the maiden flight of the first prototype, English Electric received an instruction to proceed for production.[19] By the time the first prototype had flown, the Air Ministry had placed orders for 132 production aircraft in bomber, reconnaissance, and training variants. On 21 April 1950, the first production-standard aircraft,designated as the Canberra B.2, conducted its maiden flight, piloted by Beamont. Proving to be free of problems, this first flight was almost immediately followed by the mainstream manufacturing of production Canberras. In May 1951, the Canberra entered RAF squadron service,No. 101 Squadron being the first to receive the type.[13] In a testament to the aircraft's benign handling characteristics, the transition programme for the Canberra consisted of only 20 hours in theGloster Meteor and three hours in a dual-control Canberra trainer.[21] Matthew Materia of Smiths Industries was pivotal in a secret Australian Government mission to fit an autopilot system to the Canberra bomber, Australia's major air defence[22]
In July 1949, as English Electric was in the process of setting up production atSamlesbury Aerodrome, a firm order was placed for 132 Canberras. The order consisted of 90 B.5/47 bomber-type aircraft, 34 PR.31/46 photo-reconnaissance aircraft, and 8 T.2/49 trainer aircraft.[19] On 25 June 1950, what would become known as theKorean War broke out; this led to a surge of demand for the Canberra and the British government stepping in to establish a far greater level of wartime production. This led to a succession of orders for Canberra B.2s, the initial bomber variant, being placed withAvro,Handley Page, andShort Brothers; for British needs alone, English Electric produced 196 B.2s, Avro and Handley Page manufactured 75 each, and Short completed 60 aircraft – the B.2 variant of the Canberra exceeded the numbers built of any other version.[23] Other nations, notably Australia and the United States of America, also ordered large numbers of Canberras.[19]
In the United States, theUS Air Force had identified the need to replace the obsoleteB-26 Invader, and had determined that, at the time, no home-produced aircraft designs could get close to what the Canberra could already offer. Following a competition against rivals such as theMartin XB-51, USAF decided to order a total of 403 Canberras. These aircraft werelicence-built by Glenn L. Martin Company as the B-57 Canberra. Martin developed several versions of the aircraft themselves.[24] The first examples were identical to the original English Electric aircraft, following which tandem crew seating was introduced, but later B-57 models were considerably modified.
Australia had been interested in the Canberra early on, which had led to the aircraft being named after the Australian capital city. Particular interest had at one time been expressed in a potentialRolls-Royce Tay-powered version of the aircraft.[19] The Government Aircraft Factories locally assembled 48 for theRoyal Australian Air Force.[16][24] These aircraft were broadly similar to the British B.2. Changes included the adoption of a modified leading edge, increased fuel capacity, and room for threestarter cartridges, although in practice, all three cartridges would sometimes fire, leading to the triple starter units being loaded singly.[25] In addition, Australian-built Canberras used a higher proportion of Australian- and US-sourced components.[26]
In total, 901 Canberras were manufactured by the various UK-based aircraft manufacturers; when combined with overseas licence production operations, the overall global production for the Canberras totalled 1,352 aircraft.[24] With a maximum speed of 470 knots (870 km/h; 540 mph), a standard service ceiling of 48,000 ft (14,600 m), and the ability to carry a 3.6-tonne (7,900 lb) payload, the Canberra proved to be an instant success on the domestic and export markets. It was built in 27 versions that equipped a total of 35 RAF squadrons, and was exported to more than 15 countries: Australia, Argentina,Chile,Ecuador,Ethiopia, France, India, New Zealand, Pakistan,Peru,Rhodesia, South Africa, Sweden,Venezuela, and West Germany.[21]
During the latter part of the Second World War, strategic reconnaissance missions performed by the RAF had been carried out by the de Havilland Mosquito. In 1946, the Air Ministry issued Specification PR.31/46 seeking a jet-powered replacement for the Mosquito.[27] To meet the requirement, the B.2 design was modified by adding a 14-inch (36 cm) bay forward of the wing behind the cockpit to house seven cameras.[27] It also had an additional fuel tank in the forward part of the bomb bay and only needed a two-man crew.[28] The prototype, designated PR.3, first flew on 19 March 1950, followed by the first of 35 production aircraft on 31 July 1952.[27] In December 1952, the PR.3 entered RAF service, whenNo. 540 Squadron RAF began converting from its Mosquito PR.34 force.[27] The Canberra PR.3 was the first aircraft to be designed for the RAF purely to perform photo-reconnaissance missions.[13]
.jpg)
The initial Canberra PR.3 model was shortly succeeded by the improved PR.7 variant, which featured greater fuel capacity via wing storage, the more powerful RA.7 model of the Avon engine, andMaxaretantilock braking system.[29] The Canberra PR.9 was the final photo-reconnaissance version; this aircraft was furnished with a new crew compartment, a redesigned inner wing section, and much more powerful RA.24 Avons.[29] In later service, bomber models of the Canberra were often converted with cameras and other equipment suited for reconnaissance purposes.[30]
To enable crews to convert to flying the Canberra, a trainer version was developed to meet Air Ministry Specification T.2/49.[31] On 12 June 1951, the prototype, designated T.4, conducted its first flight.[32] It was the same basic design as the B.2 apart from the introduction of side-by-side seating for the pilot and the instructor and the replacement of the glazed nose with a solid nose.[32] The first production T.4 flew on 20 September 1953 and the variant entered service withNo. 231 Operational Conversion Unit RAF in early 1954.[14][33] In addition to those assigned to the operational conversion unit, all of the B.2-equipped bomber squadrons received at least one T.4 for training purposes.[33]
In addition to the RAF, other users adopted the Canberra in the trainer role. The Indian Air Force operated a number of T.4 aircraft for conversion training purposes.[34] The RAAF adopted the Australian-built Canberra T.21 model, which was broadly similar to the T.4.[35] Argentina procured a pair of T.64 trainers during the 1970s.[36]
From the 1960s onwards, increasing numbers of bomber-oriented Canberras were deemed surplus, as newer, faster ground-attack aircraft were introduced; this led to such aircraft being rebuilt to serve in various alternative roles, including unpiloted target aircraft, radar trainers, target tugs, radar calibration aircraft, andelectronic countermeasures trainers.[29] In addition, some Canberras that had originally been manufactured for the high-altitude bomber mission were re-equipped for low-altitude, ground-attack missions.[37]
The English Electric Canberra is a bomber aircraft powered by two jet engines, and able to fly at high altitudes. An early prototype operated by Rolls-Royce regularly flew to 63,000 feet (19,000 m), where the usable speed range (coffin corner) was only 25 knots, during Avon engine test flights. Later at test base Boscombe Down, a Canberra PR9 was flown to 65,000 feet by test pilot Ian Strachan MBE AFC.[38]
The overall design has been described as a scaled-up Gloster Meteor fighter, except for its use of amid wing.[39] The Canberra principally differed from its preceding piston-powered wartime bombers by its use of twin Rolls-Royce Avon turbojet engines.[18] The fuselage was circular in cross section, tapered at both ends, and cockpit aside, entirely without protrusions; the line of the large, low-aspect-ratio wings was broken only by the tubular enginenacelles.[39] The Canberra had a two-man crew in a fighter-style cabin with a large blown canopy, but delays in the development of the intended automatic radarbombsight resulted in the addition of a bomb aimer's position housed within the nose.[20] The pilot and navigator were positioned in atandem arrangement onMartin-Baker ejection seats.[40]
.jpg)
The wing is of single-spar construction that passes through the aircraft's fuselage. The wingspan and total length of the Canberra are almost identical at just under 65 ft (20 m). Outboard of the enginenacelles, the wing has aleading edge sweep of 4° and trailing edge sweep of −14°. Allflight controls are manual, using push rods rather than cables, but are otherwise conventional. These actuate the aircraft'sflight control surfaces, including shrouded-nosedailerons, four-section, conventional, split-typeflaps, and atypicalairbrakes which comprise 40hydraulically raised fingers located on the top and bottom surfaces of the wings.[18][41] Swept wings were considered, but not adopted, since the expected operational speeds did not warrant them and because they could have introduced new aerodynamic problems into what was otherwise anticipated to be a straightforward replacement for RAFHawker Typhoon andWestland Whirlwind fighter-bombers.[10]
The fuselage of the Canberra is ofsemi-monocoque construction with a pressurised nose compartment. The whole lower section of the fuselage is taken up by the sizeable bomb bay with a pair of hydraulically driven doors.[20] The Canberra's undercarriage used a simple arrangement, the mainlanding gear being equipped with a single outboard-mounted wheel and the nose gear being a twin-wheel arrangement.[20] Due to the use of a new alloy, DTD683, the undercarriage suffered from stress corrosion cracking. Cracks would appear within only a few years.[42] The hazard posed by an undercarriage collapse during landing led the RAF to institute regular inspections, at first usingradiography before moving to more effective and reliableultrasound technology.[43] The Canberra structure is mainly metal, with only the forward portion of the tail fin made from wood.[44]
Thrust was provided by a pair of 6,700 lbf (30 kN) axial-flow Rolls-Royce Avon turbojet engines. They were mounted in the midsection of the wings using tubular trusses and links between the main mounts and the adjacent leading edge of the wing.[18] Each engine drove a 6 kW generator for the aircraft 28 VDC electrical system, a hydraulic pump for the aircraft hydraulics, and ableed air system forcabin pressurisation. Fuel was carried in two internally supportedself-sealing fuel tanks and a lace-supported bag in the upper fuselage.[18] The manufacturer specified thatCoffman engine starters should be used for engine starting. An improvised method using compressed air was discouraged by Rolls-Royce, but some operators used air starting successfully, the benefit being significant cost savings over the use of cartridges.[45]
Various avionics were installed on the Canberra, many with their origins during the Second World War. They includedGee-H navigation,Rebecca beacon-interrogation distance-measuring equipment,very high frequency radio,radio compass,radar altimeter,identification friend or foe, andOrange Putterradar warning receiver.[20] Perhaps the most crucial of the mission systems was theH2S automatic radar bombsight, which was mounted in the nose; delays in the development of the H2S intended for the Canberra led to early aircraft being fitted with a T.2optical sight for visual bombing. The optical sight was considerably inferior to radar aiming when used from high altitudes.[17]
"The value of the Canberra experience cannot be over-estimated. It is the only modern tactical strike and reconnaissance aircraft in service with the RAF and many other Air Forces. More Canberra aircraft are in service with foreign countries than the Viscount, which holds the record for British civil aircraft. This is due to the flexibility of the Canberra in its operational roles and performance ..."
The Canberra could deploy many conventional weapons; typical weapons used were 250-pound, 500-pound, and 1000-pound bombs,[47] the total bomb load could weigh up to 10,000 lb (4,500 kg).[48] Two bomb-bays are housed within the fuselage, normally enclosed by conventional clam-shell doors; a rotating door was substituted for these on the Martin-built B-57 Canberras. Additional stores of up to 2,000 pounds (900 kg) could be carried upon underwing pylons.[49] Operators often developed and installed their own munitions, such as Rhodesia's antipersonnel bomblets, the Alpha bomb. A varied range of munitions was employed on Canberra fleets around the world.[50] Antipersonnelflechette bombs were tested successfully from the Canberra by Rhodesia, but not used operationally due to international agreements.[51]
In part due to its range limitation of just 2,000 miles (3,200 km), and its inability to carry the early, bulky nuclear bombs, the Canberra was typically employed in the role of a tactical bomber as opposed to that of a strategic one.[52][N 1] In British service, many of the Canberras that were stationed overseas were not modified to deliver nuclear weapons until as late as 1957.[54]
The Canberra B.2 started to enter service with 101 Squadron in January 1951, with 101 Squadron being fully equipped by May, and a further squadron,No. 9 Squadron equipping by the end of the year. The production of the Canberra was accelerated as a result of the outbreak of the Korean War, orders for the aircraft increased and outpaced production capacity,[55] as the aircraft was designated as a "super priority".[56] A further five squadrons were able to be equipped with the Canberra by the end of 1952;[56] however, production in the 1951–52 period had only been half of the level planned, due to shortages in skilled manpower, material, and suitable machine tools.[57]
The Canberra replaced Mosquitos,Lincolns, andWashingtons as front-line bombers, showing a drastically improved performance, and proving to be effectively immune from interception during air defence exercises until the arrival of theHawker Hunter.[56] The Canberra also replaced the RAF's Mosquitos in the reconnaissance role, with the Canberra PR.3 entering service in December 1952.[58] The improved Canberra B.6, with more powerful engines and a greater fuel capacity, started to supplement the B.2s in the UK based squadrons of Bomber Command from June 1954, when they replaced 101 Squadrons B.2s. This freed up older B.2s to allow Canberra squadrons to form overseas, with bomber and reconnaissance Canberra wings forming inRAF Germany and onCyprus, with squadrons also being deployed to the Far East.[59]
The PR.7 variant of the Canberra, fitted with Avon 109 engines, executed a 1953 reconnaissance flight over the Soviet rocket launch and development site atKapustin Yar, although the UK government has never admitted the existence of such a flight. Warned by either radar or agents inside the British government, the Soviets slightly damaged one aircraft.[60][61] Further reconnaissance flights are alleged to have taken place along, and over, the borders of the Soviet Union in 1954 under thecode nameProject Robin, using the Canberra B.2WH726. The USAF also used the Canberra for reconnaissance flights.[62] The aircraft were no longer required after June 1956, following the introduction of the USLockheed U-2 purpose-built reconnaissance aircraft;Project Robin was then terminated.[63] These RAF Canberra overflights were later featured in the 1994 BBCTimewatch episode; "Spies in the Sky", and included interviews with some of the SovietMiG-15 pilots who had attempted to intercept them.[64]
The Canberra was the victorious aircraft flown inThe Last Great Air Race from London toChristchurch in 1953, piloted by Flight LieutenantRoland (Monty) Burton, which touched down at Christchurch 41 minutes ahead of its closest rival, after 23 hours and 51 minutes in the air; to this day, the record has never been broken.[65]
TheVickers Valiant entered service in 1955,[66] capable of carrying much heavier weapon loads (including theBlue Danube nuclear weapon) over longer ranges than the Canberra. This led to the Bomber Command force of Canberras equipped for high-level conventional bombing to be gradually phased out. This did not mean the end of the Canberra in front-line service, as it proved suitable for the low-level strike and ground-attack role, and versions dedicated to this role were brought into service.[67] The interim B(I).6, converted from the B.6 by adding provision for a pack of fourHispano 20 mm cannon in the rear bomb bay and underwing pylons for bombs and rockets, entered service in 1955, with the definitive, new-build B(I).8, which added a new forward fuselage with a fighter-style canopy for the pilot, entering service in January 1956.[67]
During the Cold War the Canberra B.6 was used byRAF 76 Squadron to sample atomic and thermo-nuclear mushroom clouds during the British Nuclear Tests inAustralia and onChristmas Island. The Canberra B.6 were fitted with specialised equipment to collect particulate samples from the mushroom clouds at various heights. It was quite risky as the equipment measuring radiation when they were in the cloud was not always accurate.[68]
An important role for the new low-level force was tactical nuclear strike, using theLow Altitude Bombing System to allow a nuclear bomb to be delivered from low level while allowing the bomber to escape the blast of the weapon. RAF Germany's force of four squadrons equipped with the B(I).6 and B(I).8 could carry US-ownedMark 7 nuclear bombs from 1960, which were replaced byB43 nuclear bombs, also US-owned, from 1965. Three squadrons based on Cyprus and one at Singapore were armed with British-ownedRed Beard nuclear weapons.[69][70]
Bomber Command retired the last of its Canberras on 11 September 1961,[71] but the Germany, Cyprus and Singapore based squadrons continued in the nuclear strike role. The Cyprus-based squadrons and one of the RAF Germany squadrons disbanded in 1969, with the Singapore-based unit followed in 1970. The three remaining RAF Germany units, which by now had replaced the old Mark 7 bombs with newer (but still US-owned) B43 nuclear bombs, remained operational until 1972, the last Canberra bombers in RAF service.[72]
The RAF continued to operate the Canberra after 1972, employing it for reconnaissance (with squadrons equipped with PR.7s and PR.9s being based atRAF Wyton in the UK andRAF Luqa in Malta). The PR.9s were fitted with special long-range optical photography cameras, reportedly based on those used by the Lockheed U-2, to allow high-altitude photography of targets deep inside Eastern Europe while flying along theinner German border, as well asinfrared linescan cameras for low-level night reconnaissance.[73][N 2] The RAF used Canberras to search for hidden arms dumps usingfalse-colour photography duringOperation Motorman in July 1972, when the British Army re-took Irish republican held "no go areas" inBelfast andDerry.[75] Canberras were used for reconnaissance during theBosnian War during the 1990s, where they were used to locate mass graves and during theKosovo War in 1999. They were also operated fromUganda during theFirst Congo War, where they were used to search for refugees.[76] Small numbers of specially equipped Canberras were also used forsignals intelligence, being operated by192 Squadron and then51 Squadron from 1953 to 1976.[77]
During the Falklands War, a plan to supply two PR.9s to the Chilean Air Force, and secretly operate them with RAF crews over the war zone, was abandoned for political reasons. The aircraft got as far asBelize before the operation was cancelled.[78][79] The PR.9 variant remained in service withNo. 39 (1 PRU) Squadron until July 2006 for strategic reconnaissance and photographic mapping, seeing service in the2003 invasion of Iraq, and up to June 2006, inAfghanistan. During a ceremony to mark the standing down of 39 (1 PRU) Squadron atRAF Marham on 28 July 2006, a flypast by a Canberra PR.9 on its last ever sortie was conducted, which included a flight over Belfast, where it had been manufactured at Short Brothers.[80]
Shortly after the end of the Second World War, the Australian government initiated a wide-scale reorganisation of the armed forces. As part of this process, the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) developedPlan D as the basis for its postwar structure; Plan D was built around the concept of a numerically smaller, but more agile air arm that would employ leading-edge technology.[81] During the late 1940s, the RAAF decided to acquire the Canberra as a replacement for, or complement to, the Avro Lincoln,[N 3] though fears were raised that the new design was not especially advanced.[82] While Australia never introduced nuclear weapons into service, the Canberra's ability to carry such a payload was a stated factor in its acquisition;[83] Australia's planned force of 48 Canberras, which held the potential for being nuclear-armed, was viewed as far more potent and deterring to potential opponents than the RAAF's entire wartime forces of 254 heavy bombers.[84][N 4]
The Australian government decided that the RAAF's Canberras would be constructed domestically by the Government Aircraft Factories as opposed to being manufactured in the UK.[19] On 29 May 1953, the first Australian-built Canberra performed its first flight atAvalon Airport, Victoria; this aircraft was delivered to the RAAF for service trials a few weeks later.[14] In December 1953, the Canberra formally entered Australian service.[86]
From July 1950 to July 1960, during theMalayan Emergency, Canberras from Australia, New Zealand, and the UK were deployed into Malaysia to fight against Communistguerrillas.[87] In 1967, the RAAF deployed eight Canberras to the Vietnam War. The unit,No. 2 Squadron, was later commended for its performance by the United States Air Force.[88] The Canberras were typically operated in the low-level bombing role, taking responsibility for South Vietnam's southernmost military regions, regions III and IV, and allowing USAF bombers to deploy their aircraft to theHo Chi Minh trail. While USAF Canberras were equipped with.50 caliber machine guns or20 mm cannon for strafing, Australian Canberras were deployed to South Vietnam without guns, hence were deployed strictly for low-level bombing missions.[89][90][N 5] Upon their redeployment from Vietnam in 1971, No. 2 Squadron had flown about 12,000 sorties and dropped 76,389 bombs, and lost two of their aircraft to missiles and ground fire during the course of the war.[86][92][93]
As early as 1954, Australia recognised that the Canberra was becoming outdated, and evaluated aircraft such as theAvro Vulcan andHandley-Page Victor as potential replacements.[94] The Canberra was incapable of providing adequate coverage ofIndonesia from Australian bases, and was evaluated as having a "very low" chance of survival if it encountered modern fighters like theMiG-17.[95] Political pressure for a Canberra replacement rose to a head in 1962.[96] Australia evaluated theBAC TSR-2,Dassault Mirage IV,McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II, andNorth American A-5 Vigilante, and initially appeared to favour the TSR-2, but chose to procure theGeneral Dynamics F-111C in October 1963.[97][98] Due in part to delays in the delivery of the F-111Cs, the Canberra continued to be used by Australia for a total of 29 years before its retirement in June 1982.[82][86][96]
The Canberra was the backbone of theIndian Air Force (IAF) for bombing raids and photo reconnaissance for many decades. Negotiations to acquire the Canberra as a replacement for the obsoleteConsolidated B-24 Liberator bombers then being used by IAF began in 1954.[34] During the extended negotiations between Britain and India, the Soviet Union is alleged to have offered their own jet bomber, theIlyushin Il-28, at a significantly lower price than that asked for the Canberra;[34] by April 1956, however, the Indian government was in favour of the purchase. In January 1957, India placed a large order for the Canberra; in total, 54 B(I).58 bombers, eight PR.57 photo-reconnaissance aircraft, and six T.4 training aircraft were ordered, and deliveries began in the summer of that same year.[34] Twelve more Canberras were ordered in September 1957, and as many as 30 more may have also been purchased by 1962.[34]
On 10 April 1959, an Indian Canberra was shot down while performing areconnaissance mission overRawalpindi. The Canberra was shot down by aF-86F Sabre flown byFlight Lieutenant M Younis. The two crew members of the Canberra ejected and were later arrested by Pakistani authorities. This incident also marked the first aerial victory for thePakistan Air Force.[99][100][101]
First used in combat by the IAF in 1962, the Canberra was employed during the UN campaign against the breakawayRepublic of Katanga in Africa.[citation needed] During theIndo-Pakistani Wars of the 1960s and 1970s, the Canberra was used by both sides. The most audacious use of the bomber was in the "Raid on Badin" during theIndo-Pakistani War of 1965, when the IAF sent in the Canberra to attack a critical Pakistani radar post inWest Pakistan. The raid was a complete success, the radars in Badin having been badly damaged by the bombing and put out of commission.[102] A later raid by the IAF was attempted on Peshawar Air base with the aim of destroying, amongst other targets, several Pakistani B-57 bombers, American-built Canberras. Due to poor visibility, a road outside of the base was bombed, instead of the runway where PAF B-57 bombers were parked.[103]
During theIndo-Pakistani War of 1971, Indian Canberras flew a strategically important sortie against theKarachi oil tanks, which had the effect of helping theIndian Navy in their own operations, a series ofmissile boat attacks against the Pakistani coast.[102] On 21 May 1999, prior to the commencement of theKargil War, the IAF Air HQ assigned a Canberra PR.57 aircraft on a photographic mission near theLine of Control, where it took a severe blow from aFIM-92 Stingerinfrared homing missile on the starboard engine; the Canberra successfully returned to base using the other engine.
The entire IAF Canberra fleet was grounded and then retired following the crash of an IAF Canberra in December 2005. After 50 years of service, the Canberra was finally retired by the IAF on 11 May 2007.[104]
During theSuez Crisis, the RAF employed around 100 Canberras, flying conventional bombing and reconnaissance missions from airfields inMalta and Cyprus.[1] A total of 278 Canberra sorties were flown, dropping 1,439 bombs weighing 1,000 lbs (450 kg) each.[105] However low-level strikes by smaller fighters were judged to be more effective than the night-time bombing operations performed by both the Canberra and the Vickers Valiant.[106] In addition, many of the bombs, intended to hit Egyptian airfields, missed their targets, failing to inflict much damage to the Egyptian Air Force or to badly demoralise the enemy.[107] While interception of the Canberra was within the capabilities of Egypt's MiG-15s and MiG-17s, as shown by the interception of Canberras by MiG-15s prior to the Anglo-French invasion, these did not result in any losses. The only Canberra shot down during the Suez campaign was a PR.7 shot down by a Syrian Gloster Meteor fighter on 6 November 1956, the last day of the war.[108][109]
TheFederation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland considered the Canberra an important objective to holding greater diplomatic sway in the African continent, and ongoing negotiations over the Baghdad treaty, and a step towardsdecolonisation.[110] The Suez Crisis caused a delay in the sale, but in August 1957 18 Canberras had been earmarked to be refurbished and transferred from the RAF to theRoyal Rhodesian Air Force (RRAF).[110] Both Rhodesia and South Africa used Canberras in their respectiveBush Wars; numerous aircraft were lost in the conflict, only one of which was lost by theSouth African Air Force.[111] Rhodesian B.2 Canberras together with South African B(I).12 Canberras carried out attacks on insurgents inMozambique, usually armed with 'Alpha' cluster bombs,[112] several raids onZambia, and attacks upon multiple insurgent bases inAngola.[113] Ethiopian Canberras were used againstEritrea and again againstSomalia during the 1970s.
TheSwedish Air Force purchased two Canberras from the RAF in 1960, and had these modified to T.11s byBoulton Paul. The aircraft were secretly modified in Sweden as espionage aircraft for eavesdropping on primarily Soviet, Polish, and East German military radio transmissions, although this was not publicly admitted until 10 years later. The Canberras were given the designation Tp 52, and taken into service as "testing aircraft", until they were replaced by two Tp 85Caravelles in 1971.[114]
On 20 April 1960, theVenezuelan Air Force used its Canberra B.2 and B(I).8s to bomb the airport atSan Cristóbal, Táchira, which had been seized by rebels, led by General Jose Maria Castro León. The rebels surrendered shortly afterward.[115] On 26 June 1961, Venezuela's Canberras were used against rebelling Army forces inBarcelona, Venezuela.[116]
Peruvian Air Force Canberras flew combat sorties against Ecuadorian positions during theCenepa War in 1995. On 6 February 1995, a Canberra B.68 disappeared over the operations zone; the aircraft had apparently struck a hill in poor weather conditions. Peru retired its Canberras in June 2005 and the survivors put in reserve until 2008. Peru bought 9 B(I).78 ex-(B(I).8) in 1956, 6 B.72 ex-(B.2) in 1966, 3 T.74 ex-(T.4) in 1966, 6 B(I).56 ex-(B.6), and 12 B(I).68 ex-(B(I).8) in 1974. They also bought 5 ex-SAAF B(I).12 ex-(B(I).8) and 1 T.74 ex-(T.4).
TheArgentine Air Force received ten B.62 bombers and two T.64 trainers in the early 1970s,[36] replacing the Avro Lincoln in the bomber role. Argentina retired its last Canberras in April 2000.[citation needed] During theFalklands War in 1982, eight Canberras were deployed toTrelew, 670 mi (1,080 km) from the Falkland Islands, to avoid congestion at the closer southern airfields. Although within operational range of the British task force, the type was considered a limited threat due to its poor manoeuvrability compared with theSea Harrier.[117]
Between 1 May and 14 June 1982, Argentine Canberras flew 54 sorties, including 36 bombing missions, 22 of which were at night.[118] Two aircraft were lost in combat. The first was shot down by a Sea Harrier firing anAIM-9L Sidewinderair-to-air missile on 1 May 1982.[118] The second, a Canberra B.62 ofGrupo de Bombardeo 2, serialB-108, was shot down on 13 June 1982 at 39,000 ft (12,000 m) by aSea Dart missile fired fromHMS Exeter (D89). The pilot, Captain Pastrán, ejected, while the navigator, Captain Casado, was killed.[119] This was the last Argentine aircraft lost in combat during the conflict, with Argentine forces surrendering the following day.[120]
The Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF) leased 17 Canberra B.2s and three T.4s from the RAF from 1958 to 1962 pending delivery of their own Canberras. The leased Canberras were operated byNo. 75 Squadron RNZAF out ofRAF Tengah, Singapore, and were used in operations during the Malayan Emergency. One aircraft was destroyed during this period.[121][122]
The RNZAF took delivery of 11 B(I).12s and two T.13 trainers between 1959 and 1961, and these were operated byNo. 14 Squadron RNZAF. In 1964, No. 14 Squadron was deployed to RAF Tengah and participated in theIndonesia–Malaysia confrontation before returning to New Zealand in November 1966. Three of the B(I).12s were destroyed in accidents. The Canberra was replaced by theA-4K Skyhawk in 1970, and the eight surviving B(I).12s and the two T.13s were sold to India.[121][122]
A number of Canberras were used by English Electric for development work and trials on new equipment. It was also used by government establishments such as theRoyal Aircraft Establishment and theRoyal Radar Establishment. The Canberra proved to be a useful platform for such work and was used by a number of British tests and trials establishments. A number of engine manufacturers were also lent Canberras as engine test beds:Armstrong Siddeley for theSapphire,Bristol Siddeley for theOlympus,de Havilland Engine Company for theGyron Junior turbojet, andRolls-Royce Limited for the Avon.Ferranti used four different Canberra B.2s for avionics development work.
One example isWV787, built as a Canberra B.2 in 1952, it was lent to Armstrong Siddeley and fitted with Sapphire engines.[123] It was later transferred to Ferranti for trials for theBlackburn Buccaneer'sBlue Parrot radar and fitted with a B(I).8 type nose and a Buccaneer-style radome.[123] It next was moved to theAeroplane and Armament Experimental Establishment where it was modified to be used as a water-spray tanker aircraft for de-icing trials.[123] It would fly in front of the aircraft being tested, which would fly into the artificial cloud created by the sprayed water to induce icing.[123] It was retired in 1984 and later preserved at theNewark Air Museum and is a National Benchmark airframe on the National Aviation Heritage Register.[124]
Canberra B.82
Canberra B(I).82
Canberra PR.83
Canberra T.84
Canberra B(I).88
|
|
|
 | This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(January 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
_52001_01_(7618390398).jpg)
Several ex-RAF machines and RB-57s remain flying in the US for research and mapping work. About 10 airworthy Canberras are in private hands today, and are flown at air displays.
At least five Canberras retired from the Argentine Air Force have been preserved inArgentina:
.jpg)
Data fromCombat Aircraft Recognition[242]
General characteristics
Performance
Armament
Nuclear weapons: in addition to conventional ordnance, the Canberra was also type-approved fortactical nuclear weapon delivery, including the Mk 7,B28 (Mod 2, 70 kiloton yield),B57 and B43 (as part of ajoint program with the United States) plus the Red Beard andWE.177A (Mod A, 10 kiloton yield)nuclear bombs.[244] Allnuclear weapons were carried internally.
Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
Related lists
{{cite web}}:Missing or empty|title= (help)
| External videos | |
|---|---|
 Canberra bomber at Avalon Airshow, 2003 | |
| Pathe News report on the Canberra, 1951 | |
| 1998 documentary on the Canberra |