 | This article needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2025) |
| Economic Blackout | ||
|---|---|---|
| Part ofProtests against the second presidency of Donald Trump | ||
| Date | February 28, 2025
| |
| Location | United States | |
| Caused by |
| |
| Methods | Boycotts | |
| Parties | ||
| Lead figures | ||
John Schwarz | ||
| thepeoplesunionusa | ||
TheEconomic Blackout refers to a series of 24-hour consumer spending boycotts that took place on February 28, 2025, in the United States, with planned boycotts for future dates including March 28. Organized by The People's Union USA activist group, the protest encouragedAmericans to refrain from making any purchases for an entire day. The initiative aimed to challenge the influence ofmajor corporations andwealthy individuals onworking-class Americans, with many boycotters joining to protest the currentTrump administration's rollback ofdiversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. While the boycott gained significant attention onsocial media platforms, its measurable economic impact was regarded by economic analysts as inconclusive.[1][2]
The Economic Blackout occurred within a broader context ofconsumer activism in early 2025, particularly focusing on corporatediversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. Several major companies had recently scaled back their DEI initiatives following President Donald Trump'selimination of federal DEI programs, leading to protests and boycotts. Many targeted the retailerTarget after its January 2025 announcement of reduced DEI commitments, which previously had been a robust part of its marketing strategy.Atlanta-based pastor ReverendJamal Bryant organized a 40-day boycott through the website targetfast.org, that was scheduled to begin on March 5, 2025 (Ash Wednesday) and continue through theLenten season.[1][3]
Separately, theNational Action Network, acivil rights organization led by ReverendAl Sharpton, announced in late January 2025 that it would identify two companies for boycotts within 90 days, focusing on businesses that had abandoned their diversity pledges. Sharpton stated that while the federal government might eliminate DEI programs, consumers retained the power to choose where they shop.[1]
The Economic Blackout was conceived and launched by The People's Union USA, an organization founded byChicagolandmeditation andmindfulness instructor and convictedsex offender[4] John Schwarz.[5] The group characterized itself aspolitically independent, focusing instead on representing the interests of ordinary citizens. The blackout was characterized as a means of protest against what organizers described as widespreadcorporate exploitation andeconomic inequality in the United States. The People's Union USA was formed to coordinate the boycott, whose stated mission was to effectively "unionize" working-class individuals across the United States to foster collective economic resistance. In a video released on February 25, Schwarz characterized the boycott as "a warning shot" to corporations that had treated Americans as "an endless source of profit" while maintainingminimal wages andlobbying for favorable political conditions.[2][3]
The boycott was scheduled to run for exactly 24 hours, beginning at midnightEastern Standard Time on February 28, 2025. Participants were instructed to avoid all forms ofconsumer spending during this period, including in-store purchases,online shopping,fast food consumption, andvehicle refueling. For urgent needs or essential items, the organizers recommended patronizingsmall local businesses and preferably usingcash rather thanelectronic payment methods.[1] The movement also called for boycotters to skip work, if possible.[2][6]
The Economic Blackout concept gained traction across varioussocial media platforms. Notable public figures who promoted the boycott including formerU.S. Secretary of LaborRobert Reich. Simultaneously, the boycott faced criticism and mockery, with some opponents humorously suggestingcounter-protestanti-boycotts in response.[1]
Several high-profile celebrities publicly endorsed the boycott. AuthorStephen King posted on hisBluesky account: "Don't buy stuff on February 28. Money's the only thing these dicks understand." ActorsBette Midler andJohn Leguizamo shared similar social media messages supporting the boycott.[2]
Googlesearch analytics recorded a significant surge in queries related to "economic blackout" in the days preceding the event.[2]
The Third Act movement was amongst the movements that endorsed this initiative, promoting a call of action on their website in theOregon andTexas page.[7][8]
Many social media users documented their participation through video posts, including by brewing coffee at home instead of buying it, packing lunches for work, and purchasing necessities and goods in advance. The boycott intersected with another social media trend called "No Buy 2025," focused on reducing personaloverconsumption throughout the year.[1]
Many boycott participants expressed support for the blackout as part of a broader commitment to redirect spending away from companies that had retreated from DEI initiatives, such asAmazon,Walmart, and Target, toCostco, which had maintained its diversity programs.[1][9][10]
The People's Union USA announced plans for another general Economic Blackout for March 28, 2025. Additionally, the organization promoted targeted weeklong boycotts against specific corporations including Walmart, Amazon (including its subsidiaryWhole Foods),Nestlé, andGeneral Mills.[1]
Marketing experts offered mixed assessments of the blackout's potential impact. By midday on February 28, retail market research firmCircana reported no significant decrease in consumer spending. Marshal Cohen, the firm's chief retail advisor, indicated that after consulting withretail chain executives and receiving reports from analysts monitoring shopping centers nationwide, consumer behavior appeared largely unchanged. Cohen noted that normal daily fluctuations in shopping activity, such as those caused byweather conditions, typically account for 5–10% variation in customer traffic.[1]
Most research organizations were not specifically tracking the boycott's economic impact, due to online salesdata aggregators likeAdobe Analytics typically collecting spending information on a monthly basis, with exceptions made for major shopping events such asCyber Monday.[1]
When contacted by media outlets on February 27, representatives from the major corporations targeted by the boycott (Nestlé, Amazon, General Mills, Walmart,McDonald's, and Target) did not provide immediate responses regarding the planned action.[2]
Northwestern University marketing professor Anna Tuchman stated that while the single-day action might temporarily affect retail sales, it was unlikely to produce sustained changes in economic activity.[1]University of Virginiamarketing professor Young Hou stated that it would be difficult to maintain the boycotts due to the unwillingness of consumers to disrupt their spending habits for long periods, while possibly leading to counter-protests from supporters of the boycotted companies.[3]
Economic analysts drew comparisons between the Economic Blackout and theOccupy Wall Street protest movement of 2011, which emerged from public discontent following the2008 economic recession. They noted that while Occupy Wall Street involved physical protests with demonstrators occupyingpublic spaces for months, the Economic Blackout relied primarily on consumer inaction and digital organization.[2]
