Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Ecology

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromEcologist)
Study of organisms and their environment

For other uses, seeEcology (disambiguation).Not to be confused withethology,ethnology,etiology, ordeep ecology.

Ecology
Ecology addresses the full scale of life, from tiny bacteria to processes that span the entire planet. Ecologists study many diverse andcomplex relations among species, such aspredation andpollination. The diversity of life is organized into differenthabitats, fromterrestrial toaquatic ecosystems.
Part of a series on
Biology
Branches

Ecology (from Ancient Greek οἶκος (oîkos) 'house' and -λογία (-logía) 'study of')[A] is thenatural science of the relationships among livingorganisms and theirenvironment. Ecology considers organisms at the individual,population,community,ecosystem, andbiosphere levels. Ecology overlaps with the closely related sciences ofbiogeography,evolutionary biology,genetics,ethology, andnatural history.

Ecology is a branch ofbiology, and is the study ofabundance,biomass, and distribution of organisms in the context of the environment. It encompasses life processes, interactions, andadaptations; movement of materials andenergy through living communities;successional development of ecosystems; cooperation, competition, and predation within and betweenspecies; and patterns ofbiodiversity and its effect on ecosystem processes.

Ecology has practical applications in fields such asconservation biology,wetland management,natural resource management, andhuman ecology.

The termecology (German:Ökologie) was coined in 1866 by the German scientistErnst Haeckel. The science of ecology as we know it today began with a group of American botanists in the 1890s.[1]Evolutionary concepts relating to adaptation andnatural selection are cornerstones of modernecological theory.

Ecosystems are dynamically interacting systems of organisms, the communities they make up, and the non-living (abiotic) components of their environment. Ecosystem processes, such asprimary production,nutrient cycling, andniche construction, regulate the flux of energy and matter through an environment. Ecosystems havebiophysical feedback mechanisms that moderate processes acting on living (biotic) and abiotic components of the planet. Ecosystems sustain life-supporting functions and provideecosystem services likebiomass production (food, fuel, fiber, and medicine), the regulation ofclimate, globalbiogeochemical cycles,water filtration,soil formation,erosion control, flood protection, and many other natural features of scientific, historical, economic, or intrinsic value.

Levels, scope, and scale of organization

[edit]
Further information:Outline of ecology

Ecosystems vary from tiny to vast. A single tree is of little consequence to the classification of a forest ecosystem, but is critically relevant to organisms living in and on it.[2] Several generations of anaphid population can exist over the lifespan of a single leaf. Each of those aphids, in turn, supports diversebacterial communities.[3] The nature of connections in ecological communities cannot be explained by knowing the details of each species in isolation, because the emergent pattern is neither revealed nor predicted until the ecosystem is studied as an integrated whole.[4]

The main subdisciplines of ecology,population (orcommunity) ecology andecosystem ecology, differ in their contrasting paradigms. The former focuses on organisms' distribution and abundance, while the latter focuses on materials and energy fluxes.[5]

Hierarchy

[edit]
See also:Biological organisation

To structure the study of ecology into a conceptually manageable framework, the biological world is organized into ahierarchy, ranging in scale from (as far as ecology is concerned)organisms, topopulations, toguilds, tocommunities, toecosystems, tobiomes, and up to the level of thebiosphere.[6] This framework forms apanarchy[7] and exhibitsnon-linear behaviors; this means that "effect and cause are disproportionate, so that small changes to critical variables, such as the number ofnitrogen fixers, can lead to disproportionate, perhaps irreversible, changes in the system properties."[8]: 14 

Biodiversity

[edit]
Main article:Biodiversity
Biodiversity of acoral reef.Corals adapt to and modify their environment by formingcalcium carbonate skeletons. This provides growing conditions for future generations and forms a habitat for many other species.[9]

Biodiversity (an abbreviation of "biological diversity") describes the diversity of life from genes to ecosystems and spans every level of biological organization. The term has several interpretations, and there are many ways to index, measure, characterize, and represent its complex organization.[10][11][12] Biodiversity includesspecies diversity,ecosystem diversity, andgenetic diversity and scientists are interested in the way that this diversity affects the complex ecological processes operating at and among these respective levels.[11][13][14]

Biodiversity plays an important role inecosystem services which by definition maintain and improve human quality of life.[12][15][16] Conservation priorities and management techniques require different approaches and considerations to address the full ecological scope of biodiversity.Natural capital that supports populations is critical for maintainingecosystem services[17][18] and speciesmigration (e.g., riverine fish runs and avian insect control) has been implicated as one mechanism by which those service losses are experienced.[19] An understanding of biodiversity has practical applications for species and ecosystem-level conservation planners as they make management recommendations to consulting firms, governments, and industry.[20]

Habitat

[edit]
Main article:Habitat
Long-tailed broadbill building itsnest

The habitat of a species describes the environment over which it occurs and the type of community that is formed.[21] More specifically, "habitats can be defined as regions in environmental space that are composed of multiple dimensions, each representing a biotic or abiotic environmental variable; that is, any component or characteristic of the environment related directly (e.g. forage biomass and quality) or indirectly (e.g. elevation) to the use of a location by the animal."[22]: 745 

Niche

[edit]
Main article:Ecological niche
Termite mounds with varied heights of chimneys regulate gas exchange, temperature and other environmental parameters that are needed to sustain the internal physiology of the entire colony.[23][24]

Definitions of niche date back to 1917.[25] In 1957,G. Evelyn Hutchinson introduced "the set of biotic and abiotic conditions in which a species is able to persist and maintain stable population sizes."[25]: 519  The niche is a central concept in the ecology of organisms and is sub-divided intofundamental andrealized niches. The fundamental niche is the set of environmental conditions under which a species is able to persist. The realized niche is the set of environmental plus ecological conditions under which a species persists.[25][26][27] The Hutchinsonian niche is defined more technically as a "Euclideanhyperspace whosedimensions are defined as environmental variables and whosesize is a function of the number of values that the environmental values may assume for which an organism haspositive fitness."[28]: 71 

Niche construction

[edit]
Main article:Niche construction
See also:Ecosystem engineering

Organisms are subject to environmental pressures, but they also modify their habitats. Theregulatory feedback between organisms and their environment can affect conditions from local (e.g., abeaverpond) to global scales, over time and even after death, such as decaying logs orsilica skeleton deposits from marine organisms.[29]Ecosystem engineering is related toniche construction, but the former relates only to the physical modifications of the habitat whereas the latter also considers the evolutionary implications of physical changes to the environment and feedback on natural selection. Ecosystem engineers are defined as: "organisms that directly or indirectly modulate the availability of resources to other species, by causing physical state changes in biotic or abiotic materials. In so doing they modify, maintain and create habitats."[30]: 373 

Biome

[edit]
Main article:Biome

Biomes are larger units of organization that categorize regions of the Earth's ecosystems, mainly according to the structure and composition of vegetation.[31] There are different methods to define the continental boundaries of biomes dominated by different functional types of vegetative communities that are limited in distribution by climate, precipitation, weather, and other environmental variables. Biomes includetropical rainforest,temperate broadleaf and mixed forest,temperate deciduous forest,taiga,tundra,hot desert, andpolar desert.[32] Other researchers have recently categorized other biomes, such as the human and oceanicmicrobiomes. To amicrobe, the human body is a habitat and a landscape.[33] Microbiomes were discovered largely through advances inmolecular genetics, which have revealed a hidden richness of microbial diversity on the planet. The oceanic microbiome plays a significant role in the ecological biogeochemistry of the planet's oceans.[34]

Biosphere

[edit]
Main article:Biosphere

The largest scale of ecological organization is the biosphere: the total sum of ecosystems on the planet.Ecological relationships regulate the flux of energy, nutrients, and climate all the way up to the planetary scale. For example, the dynamic history of the planetary atmosphere's CO2 and O2 composition has been affected by the biogenic flux of gases coming from respiration and photosynthesis, with levels fluctuating over time in relation to the ecology and evolution of plants and animals.[35] Ecological theory has also been used to explain self-emergent regulatory phenomena at the planetary scale: for example, theGaia hypothesis is an example ofholism applied in ecological theory.[36] The Gaia hypothesis states that there is an emergentfeedback loop generated by themetabolism of living organisms that maintains the core temperature of the Earth and atmospheric conditions within a narrow self-regulating range of tolerance.[37]

Population ecology

[edit]
Main article:Population ecology

Population ecology studies the dynamics of species populations and how these populations interact with the wider environment.[38] A population consists of individuals of the same species that live, interact, and migrate through the same niche and habitat.[39]

A primary law of population ecology is theMalthusian growth model[40] which states, "a population will grow (or decline) exponentially as long as the environment experienced by all individuals in the population remains constant."[40]: 18  Simplified populationmodels usually starts with four variables: death, birth,immigration, andemigration.

An example of an introductory population model describes a closed population, such as on an island, where immigration and emigration does not take place. Hypotheses are evaluated with reference to a null hypothesis which states thatrandom processes create the observed data. In these island models, the rate of population change is described by:

dN(t)dt=bN(t)dN(t)=(bd)N(t)=rN(t),{\displaystyle {\frac {\operatorname {d} N(t)}{\operatorname {d} t}}=bN(t)-dN(t)=(b-d)N(t)=rN(t),}

whereN is the total number of individuals in the population,b andd are the per capita rates of birth and death respectively, andr is the per capita rate of population change.[40][41]

Using these modeling techniques, Malthus' population principle of growth was later transformed into a model known as thelogistic equation byPierre Verhulst:

dN(t)dt=rN(t)αN(t)2=rN(t)(KN(t)K),{\displaystyle {\frac {\operatorname {d} N(t)}{\operatorname {d} t}}=rN(t)-\alpha N(t)^{2}=rN(t)\left({\frac {K-N(t)}{K}}\right),}

whereN(t) is the number of individuals measured asbiomass density as a function of time,t,r is the maximum per-capita rate of change commonly known as the intrinsic rate of growth, andα{\displaystyle \alpha } is the crowding coefficient, which represents the reduction in population growth rate per individual added. The formula states that the rate of change in population size (dN(t)/dt{\displaystyle \mathrm {d} N(t)/\mathrm {d} t}) will grow to approach equilibrium, where (dN(t)/dt=0{\displaystyle \mathrm {d} N(t)/\mathrm {d} t=0}), when the rates of increase and crowding are balanced,r/α{\displaystyle r/\alpha }. A common, analogous model fixes the equilibrium,r/α{\displaystyle r/\alpha } asK, which is known as the "carrying capacity."

Population ecology builds upon these introductory models to further understand demographic processes in real study populations. Commonly used types of data includelife history,fecundity, and survivorship, and these are analyzed using mathematical techniques such asmatrix algebra. The information is used for managing wildlife stocks and setting harvest quotas.[41][42] In cases where basic models are insufficient, ecologists may adopt different kinds of statistical methods, such as theAkaike information criterion,[43] or use models that can become mathematically complex as "several competing hypotheses are simultaneously confronted with the data."[44]

Metapopulations and migration

[edit]
Main article:Metapopulation
See also:Animal migration

The concept of metapopulations was defined in 1969[45] as "a population of populations which go extinct locally and recolonize".[46]: 105  Metapopulation ecology is another statistical approach that is often used inconservation research.[47] Metapopulation models simplify the landscape into patches of varying levels of quality,[48] and metapopulations are linked by the migratory behaviours of organisms. Animal migration is set apart from other kinds of movement because it involves the seasonal departure and return of individuals from a habitat.[49] Migration is also a population-level phenomenon, as with the migration routes followed by plants as they occupied northern post-glacial environments. Plant ecologists use pollen records that accumulate and stratify in wetlands to reconstruct the timing of plant migration and dispersal relative to historic and contemporary climates. These migration routes involved an expansion of the range as plant populations expanded from one area to another. There is a larger taxonomy of movement, such as commuting, foraging, territorial behavior, stasis, and ranging. Dispersal is usually distinguished from migration because it involves the one-way permanent movement of individuals from their birth population into another population.[50][51]

Community ecology

[edit]
Interspecific interactions such aspredation are a key aspect ofcommunity ecology.
Main article:Community ecology

Community ecology examines how interactions among species and their environment affect the abundance, distribution and diversity of species within communities.

Johnson & Stinchcomb (2007)[52]: 250 

Community ecology is the study of the interactions among a collection of species that inhabit the same geographic area. Community ecologists study the determinants of patterns and processes for two or more interacting species. Research in community ecology might measurespecies diversity in grasslands in relation to soil fertility. It might also include the analysis of predator-prey dynamics, competition among similar plant species, or mutualistic interactions between crabs and corals.[52]: 250 

Ecosystem ecology

[edit]
Main article:Ecosystem ecology

These ecosystems, as we may call them, are of the most various kinds and sizes. They form one category of the multitudinous physical systems of the universe, which range from the universe as a whole down to the atom.

Tansley (1935)[53]: 299 
Ariparian forest in theWhite Mountains, New Hampshire (US) is an example ofecosystem ecology

The underlying concept of an ecosystem can be traced back to 1864 in the published work ofGeorge Perkins Marsh ("Man and Nature").[54][55] Ecosystems may be habitats within biomes that form an integrated whole and a dynamically responsive system having both physical and biological complexes. Ecosystem ecology is the science of determining the fluxes of materials (e.g. carbon, phosphorus) between different pools (e.g., tree biomass, soil organic material). Ecosystem ecologists attempt to determine the underlying causes of these fluxes. Research in ecosystem ecology might measureprimary production (g C/m^2) in awetland in relation to decomposition and consumption rates (g C/m^2/y). This requires an understanding of the community connections between plants (i.e., primary producers) and the decomposers (e.g.,fungi and bacteria).[56]

Food webs

[edit]
Main article:Food web
Generalized food web of waterbirds fromChesapeake Bay

A food web is the archetypalecological network. Plants capturesolar energy and use it to synthesizesimple sugars duringphotosynthesis. As plants grow, they accumulate nutrients and are eaten by grazingherbivores, and the energy is transferred through a chain of organisms by consumption. The simplified linear feeding pathways that move from a basaltrophic species to a top consumer is called thefood chain. Food chains in an ecological community create a complex food web. Food webs are a type ofconcept map used to illustrate and study pathways of energy and material flows.[57][58][59]

Trophic levels

[edit]
Main article:Trophic level
A trophic pyramid (a) and a food-web (b) illustratingecological relationships among creatures that are typical of a northernboreal terrestrial ecosystem. The trophic pyramid roughly represents the biomass (usually measured as total dry-weight) at each level. Plants generally have the greatest biomass. Names of trophic categories are shown to the right of the pyramid. Some ecosystems, such as many wetlands, do not organize as a strict pyramid, because aquatic plants are not as productive as long-lived terrestrial plants such as trees. Ecological trophic pyramids are typically one of three kinds: 1) pyramid of numbers, 2) pyramid of biomass, or 3) pyramid of energy.[38]: 598 

A trophic level (from Greektroph, τροφή, trophē, meaning "food" or "feeding") is "a group of organisms acquiring a considerable majority of its energy from the lower adjacent level (according toecological pyramids) nearer the abiotic source."[60]: 383  Links in food webs primarily connect feeding relations ortrophism among species. Biodiversity within ecosystems can be organized into trophic pyramids, in which the vertical dimension represents feeding relations that become further removed from the base of the food chain up toward top predators, and the horizontal dimension represents theabundance or biomass at each level.[61] When the relative abundance or biomass of each species is sorted into its respective trophic level, they naturally sort into a 'pyramid of numbers'.[62]

Species are broadly categorized asautotrophs (orprimary producers),heterotrophs (orconsumers), andDetritivores (ordecomposers). Autotrophs are organisms that produce their own food (production is greater than respiration) by photosynthesis orchemosynthesis. Heterotrophs are organisms that must feed on others for nourishment and energy (respiration exceeds production).[38] Heterotrophs can be further sub-divided into different functional groups, includingprimary consumers (strict herbivores),secondary consumers (carnivorous predators that feed exclusively on herbivores), and tertiary consumers (predators that feed on a mix of herbivores and predators).[63] Omnivores do not fit neatly into a functional category because they eat both plant and animal tissues. It has been suggested that omnivores have a greater functional influence as predators because compared to herbivores, they are relatively inefficient at grazing.[64]

Trophic levels are part of theholistic orcomplex systems view of ecosystems.[65][66] Each trophic level contains unrelated species that are grouped together because they share common ecological functions, giving a macroscopic view of the system.[67] While the notion of trophic levels provides insight into energy flow and top-down control within food webs, it is troubled by the prevalence of omnivory in real ecosystems. This has led some ecologists to "reiterate that the notion that species clearly aggregate into discrete, homogeneous trophic levels is fiction."[68]: 815  Nonetheless, recent studies have shown that real trophic levels do exist, but "above the herbivore trophic level, food webs are better characterized as a tangled web of omnivores."[69]: 612 

Keystone species

[edit]
Main article:Keystone species
Sea otters, an example of a keystone species

A keystone species is a species that is connected to a disproportionately large number of other species in thefood-web. Keystone species have lower levels of biomass in the trophic pyramid relative to the importance of their role. The many connections that a keystone species holds means that it maintains the organization and structure of entire communities. The loss of a keystone species results in a range of dramatic cascading effects (termedtrophic cascades) that alters trophic dynamics, other food web connections, and can cause the extinction of other species.[70][71] The term keystone species was coined by Robert Paine in 1969 and is a reference to thekeystone architectural feature as the removal of a keystone species can result in a community collapse just as the removal of the keystone in an arch can result in the arch's loss of stability.[72]Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) are commonly cited as an example because they limit the density ofsea urchins that feed onkelp. If sea otters are removed from the system, the urchins graze until the kelp beds disappear, and this has a dramatic effect on community structure.[73]

Complexity

[edit]
Main article:Complexity

Complexity is understood as a large computational effort needed to assemble numerous interacting parts. Global patterns of biological diversity are complex. Thisbiocomplexity stems from the interplay among ecological processes that influence patterns at different scales, such as transitional areas orecotones spanning landscapes. Complexity stems from the interplay among levels of biological organization as energy, and matter is integrated into larger units that superimpose onto the smaller parts.[74]: 209  Small scale patterns do not necessarily explain larger ones, as in Aristotle's expression "the sum is greater than the parts".[75][76][E] "Complexity in ecology is of at least six distinct types: spatial, temporal, structural, process, behavioral, and geometric."[77]: 3  From these principles, ecologists have identifiedemergent andself-organizing phenomena that operate at different environmental scales of influence, ranging from molecular to planetary, and these require different explanations at eachintegrative level.[37][78]

Holism

[edit]
Main article:Holism

Holism is a critical part of the theory of ecology. Holism addresses thebiological organization of life thatself-organizes into layers of emergent whole systems that function according to non-reducible properties. This means that higher-order patterns of a whole functional system, such as anecosystem, cannot be predicted or understood by a simple summation of the parts.[79] "New properties emerge because the components interact, not because the basic nature of the components is changed."[38]: 8 

Relation to evolution

[edit]
Main article:Evolutionary ecology

Ecology and evolutionary biology are sister disciplines.Natural selection,life history,development,adaptation,populations, andinheritance thread equally into both. In this framework, the analytical tools of ecologists and evolutionists overlap as they study life throughphylogenetics orLinnaean taxonomy.[80] There is no sharp boundary separating ecology from evolution, and they differ more in their areas of applied focus. Both explain properties and processes across different spatial or temporal scales of organization.[81][37] Ecologists study the abiotic and biotic factors that influence evolutionary processes,[82][83] and evolution can be rapid, occurring on ecological timescales as short as one generation.[84]

Behavioural ecology

[edit]
Main article:Behavioural ecology
Social display and colour variation in differently adapted species ofchameleons (Bradypodion spp.). Chameleons change their skin colour to match their background as a behavioural defence mechanism and also use colour to communicate with other members of their species, such as dominant (left) versus submissive (right) patterns shown in the three species (A-C) above.[85]

All organisms have behaviours. Even plants express complex behaviour, including memory and communication.[86] Behavioural ecology is the study of an organism's behaviour in its environment and its ecological and evolutionary implications. Ethology is the study of observable movement or behaviour in animals. This could include investigations of motilesperm of plants, mobilephytoplankton,zooplankton swimming toward the female egg, the cultivation of fungi byweevils, the mating dance of asalamander, or social gatherings ofamoeba.[87][88][89][90][91]

Adaptation is the central unifying concept in behavioural ecology.[92] Behaviours can be recorded as traits and inherited in much the same way that eye and hair colour can. Behaviours can evolve by means of natural selection as adaptive traits conferring functional utilities that increases reproductive fitness.[93][94]

Cognitive ecology

[edit]

Cognitive ecology integrates theory and observations fromevolutionary ecology andcognitive science, to understand the effect of animal interaction with their habitat on their cognitive systems.[95] "Until recently, however, cognitive scientists have not paid sufficient attention to the fundamental fact that cognitive traits evolved under particular natural settings. With consideration of the selection pressure on cognition, cognitive ecology can contribute intellectual coherence to the multidisciplinary study of cognition."[96][97]

Social ecology

[edit]
Main article:Social ecology (academic field)

Social-ecological behaviours are notable in thesocial insects,slime moulds,social spiders,human society, andnaked mole-rats whereeusocialism has evolved. Social behaviours include reciprocally beneficial behaviours among kin and nest mates[89][94][98] and evolve from kin and group selection.Kin selection explains altruism through genetic relationships, whereby an altruistic behaviour leading to death is rewarded by the survival of genetic copies distributed among surviving relatives. The social insects, includingants,bees, andwasps are most famously studied for this type of relationship because the male drones areclones that share the same genetic make-up as every other male in the colony.[94] In contrast,group selectionists find examples of altruism among non-genetic relatives and explain this through selection acting on the group; whereby, it becomes selectively advantageous for groups if their members express altruistic behaviours to one another. Groups with predominantly altruistic members survive better than groups with predominantly selfish members.[94][99]

Coevolution

[edit]
Main article:Coevolution
Bumblebees and theflowers theypollinate have coevolved so that both have become dependent on each other for survival.
Parasitism: A harvestmanarachnid being parasitized bymites. The harvestman is being consumed, while the mites benefit from traveling on and feeding off of their host.

Ecological interactions can be classified broadly into ahost and an associate relationship. A host is any entity that harbours another that is called the associate.[100] Relationshipsbetween species that are mutually or reciprocally beneficial are calledmutualisms. Examples of mutualism includefungus-growing ants employing agricultural symbiosis, bacteria living in the guts of insects and other organisms, thefig wasp andyucca moth pollination complex,lichens with fungi and photosyntheticalgae, andcorals with photosynthetic algae.[101][102] If there is a physical connection between host and associate, the relationship is calledsymbiosis. Approximately 60% of all plants, for example, have a symbiotic relationship witharbuscular mycorrhizal fungi living in their roots forming an exchange network of carbohydrates formineral nutrients.[103]

Biogeography

[edit]
Main article:Biogeography

Biogeography is the comparative study of the geographic distribution of organisms and the corresponding evolution of their traits in space and time.[104] TheJournal of Biogeography was established in 1974.[105] Biogeography and ecology share many of their disciplinary roots.Island biogeography, published by Robert MacArthur andEdward O. Wilson in 1967,[106] is one of the fundamentals of ecological theory.[107] Biogeography has a long history in the natural sciences concerning the spatial distribution of plants and animals. Ecology and evolution provide the explanatory context for biogeographical studies.[104] Biogeographical patterns result from ecological processes that influence range distributions, such asmigration anddispersal.[107] and from historical processes that split populations or species into different areas. The biogeographic processes that result in the natural splitting of species explain much of the modern distribution of the Earth's biota. The splitting of lineages in a species is calledvicariance biogeography and it is a sub-discipline of biogeography.[108] There are also practical applications in the field of biogeography concerning ecological systems and processes. For example, the range and distribution of biodiversity and invasive species responding to climate change is a serious concern and active area of research in the context ofglobal warming.[109][110]

r/K selection theory

[edit]
Main article:r/K selection theory

r/K selection theory[D] is one of the first predictive models in ecology used to explainlife-history evolution. Its premise is that natural selection varies withpopulation density. For example, when an island is first colonized, density of individuals is low. The initial increase in population size is not limited by competition, leaving an abundance of availableresources for rapid population growth. These early phases ofpopulation growth experiencedensity-independent forces of natural selection, which is calledr-selection. As the population becomes more crowded, it approaches the island's carrying capacity, thus forcing individuals to compete more heavily for fewer available resources. Under crowded conditions, the population experiences density-dependent forces of natural selection, calledK-selection.[111] In ther/K-selection model, the first variabler is the intrinsic rate of natural increase in population size and the second variableK is the carrying capacity of a population.[27]

Molecular ecology

[edit]
Main article:Molecular ecology

The relationship between ecology and genetic inheritance predates modern techniques for molecular analysis. Molecular ecological research became more feasible with the development of rapid and accessible genetic technologies, such as thepolymerase chain reaction (PCR). The rise of molecular technologies and the influx of research questions into this new field resulted in the publicationMolecular Ecology in 1992.[112]Molecular ecology uses analytical techniques to study genes in an evolutionary and ecological context. In 1994,John Avise played a leading role in this area of science with the publication of his book,Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution.[113]

Human ecology

[edit]

A dual discipline

[edit]
Main article:Human ecology

Only within the moment of time represented by the present century has one species man acquired significant power to alter the nature of his world.

Rachel Carson, "Silent Spring"[114]

Ecology is both a biological science and a human science.[38] Human ecology is aninterdisciplinary investigation into the ecology of our species. "Human ecology may be defined: (1) from a bioecological standpoint as the study of man as the ecological dominant in plant and animal communities and systems; (2) from a bioecological standpoint as simply another animal affecting and being affected by his physical environment; and (3) as a human being, somehow different from animal life in general, interacting with physical and modified environments in a distinctive and creative way. A truly interdisciplinary human ecology will most likely address itself to all three."[115]: 3  The term was formally introduced in 1921, but many sociologists, geographers, psychologists, and other disciplines were interested in human relations to natural systems centuries prior, especially in the late 19th century.[115][116]

Restoration Ecology

[edit]
Main article:Restoration ecology

Ecosystem management is not just about science nor is it simply an extension of traditional resource management; it offers a fundamental reframing of how humans may work with nature.

Grumbine (1994)[117]: 27 

Ecology is an employed science of restoration, repairing disturbed sites through human intervention, in natural resource management, and inenvironmental impact assessments. Edward O. Wilson predicted in 1992 that the 21st century "will be the era of restoration in ecology".[118]

Relation to the environment

[edit]
Main article:Natural environment

The environment of ecosystems includes both physical parameters and biotic attributes. It is dynamically interlinked and containsresources for organisms at any time throughout their life cycle.[38][119] Like ecology, the term environment has different conceptual meanings and overlaps with the concept of nature. Environment "includes the physical world, the social world of human relations and the built world of human creation."[120]: 62  The physical environment is external to the level of biological organization under investigation, includingabiotic factors such as temperature, radiation, light, chemistry,climate and geology. The biotic environment includes genes, cells, organisms, members of the same species (conspecifics) and other species that share a habitat.[121]

Disturbance and resilience

[edit]
Main article:Resilience (ecology)

A disturbance is any process that changes or removes biomass from a community, such as a fire, flood, drought, or predation.[122] Disturbances are both the cause and product of natural fluctuations within an ecological community.[123][122][124][125] Biodiversity can protect ecosystems from disturbances.[125]

Metabolism and the early atmosphere

[edit]
Main article:Early atmosphere

Metabolism – the rate at which energy and material resources are taken up from the environment, transformed within an organism, and allocated to maintenance, growth and reproduction – is a fundamental physiological trait.

Ernest et al.[126]: 991 

The Earth was formed approximately 4.5 billion years ago.[127] As it cooled and a crust and oceans formed, its atmosphere transformed from being dominated byhydrogen to one composed mostly ofmethane andammonia. Over the next billion years, the metabolic activity of life transformed the atmosphere into a mixture ofcarbon dioxide,nitrogen, and water vapor. These gases changed the way that light from the sun hit the Earth's surface and greenhouse effects trapped heat. There were untapped sources of free energy within the mixture ofreducing and oxidizing gasses that set the stage for primitive ecosystems to evolve and, in turn, the atmosphere also evolved.[128]

Theleaf is the primary site ofphotosynthesis in many higher plants.

Throughout history, the Earth's atmosphere andbiogeochemical cycles have been in adynamic equilibrium with planetary ecosystems. The history is characterized by periods of significant transformation followed by millions of years of stability.[129] The evolution of the earliest organisms, likely anaerobicmethanogen microbes, started the process by converting atmospheric hydrogen into methane (4H2 + CO2 → CH4 + 2H2O).Anoxygenic photosynthesis reduced hydrogen concentrations and increasedatmospheric methane, by convertinghydrogen sulfide into water or other sulfur compounds (for example, 2H2S + CO2 + hv → CH2O + H2O + 2S). Early forms offermentation also increased levels of atmospheric methane. The transition to an oxygen-dominant atmosphere (theGreat Oxidation) did not begin until approximately 2.4–2.3 billion years ago, but photosynthetic processes started 0.3–1 billion years prior.[129][130]

Radiation: heat, temperature and light

[edit]

The biology of life operates within a certain range of temperatures. Heat is a form of energy that regulates temperature. Heat affects growth rates, activity, behaviour, andprimary production. Temperature is largely dependent on the incidence ofsolar radiation. The latitudinal and longitudinal spatial variation oftemperature greatly affects climates and consequently the distribution ofbiodiversity and levels of primary production in different ecosystems or biomes across the planet. Heat and temperature relate importantly to metabolic activity.Poikilotherms have a body temperature largely dependent on the temperature of the external environment. In contrast,homeotherms regulate their internal body temperature by expendingmetabolic energy.[82][83][131] There is a relationship between light, primary production, and ecologicalenergy budgets. Sunlight is the primary input of energy into the planet's ecosystems. Light is composed ofelectromagnetic energy of differentwavelengths.Radiant energy from the sun generates heat, provides photons of light measured as active energy in the chemical reactions of life, and also acts as a catalyst forgenetic mutation.[82][83][131] Plants, algae, and some bacteria absorb light and assimilate the energy throughphotosynthesis. Organisms capable of assimilating energy by photosynthesis or through inorganic fixation ofH2S areautotrophs. Autotrophs—responsible for primary production—assimilate light energy which becomes metabolically stored aspotential energy in the form of biochemicalenthalpic bonds.[82][83][131]

Physical environments

[edit]

Water

[edit]
Main article:Aquatic ecosystem

Wetland conditions such as shallow water, high plant productivity, and anaerobic substrates provide a suitable environment for important physical, biological, and chemical processes. Because of these processes, wetlands play a vital role in global nutrient and element cycles.

Cronk & Fennessy (2001)[132]: 29 

Diffusion of carbon dioxide and oxygen is approximately 10,000 times slower in water than in air. When soils are flooded, they quickly lose oxygen, becominghypoxic (an environment with O2 concentration below 2 mg/liter) and eventually completelyanoxic whereanaerobic bacteria thrive among the roots. Water influences the intensity andspectral composition of light as it reflects off the water surface and submerged particles.[132] Salt water plants (halophytes) have additional specialized adaptations, such as the development of special organs for shedding salt andosmoregulating their internal salt (NaCl) concentrations, to live inestuarine,brackish, oroceanic environments.[132] The physiology of fish is adapted to compensate for environmental salt levels through osmoregulation. Their gills formelectrochemical gradients that mediate salt excretion in salt water and uptake in fresh water.[133]

Gravity

[edit]

The shape and energy of the land are significantly affected by gravitational forces. These govern many of the geophysical properties and distributions of biomes across the Earth. On the organismal scale, gravitational forces provide directional cues for plant and fungal growth (gravitropism), orientation cues for animal migrations, and influence thebiomechanics and size of animals.[82] Ecological traits, such as allocation of biomass in trees during growth are subject to mechanical failure as gravitational forces influence the position and structure of branches and leaves.[134] Thecardiovascular systems of animals are functionally adapted to overcome the pressure and gravitational forces that change according to the features of organisms (e.g., height, size, shape), their behaviour (e.g., diving, running, flying), and the habitat occupied (e.g., water, hot deserts, cold tundra).[135]

Pressure

[edit]

Climatic andosmotic pressure placesphysiological constraints on organisms, especially those that fly and respire at high altitudes, or dive to deep ocean depths.[136] These constraints influence vertical limits of ecosystems in the biosphere, as organisms are physiologically sensitive and adapted to atmospheric and osmotic water pressure differences.[82] For example, oxygen levels decrease with decreasing pressure and are a limiting factor for life at higher altitudes.[137]Water transportation by plants is affected by osmotic pressure gradients.[138][139][140]Water pressure in the depths of oceans requires that organisms adapt to these conditions. For example, diving animals such aswhales,dolphins, andseals are adapted to deal with changes in sound due to water pressure differences.[141]

Wind and turbulence

[edit]
The architecture of theinflorescence in grasses is subject to the physical pressures of wind and shaped by the forces of natural selection facilitating wind-pollination (anemophily).[142][143]

Turbulent forces in air and water affect the environment and ecosystem distribution, form, and dynamics. On a planetary scale, ecosystems are affected by circulation patterns in the globaltrade winds. Wind power and the turbulent forces it creates can influence heat, nutrient, and biochemical profiles of ecosystems.[82] For example, wind running over the surface of a lake creates turbulence, mixing thewater column and influencing the environmental profile to createthermally layered zones, affecting how fish, algae, and other parts of theaquatic ecosystem are structured.[144][145]

Wind speed and turbulence influenceevapotranspiration rates and energy budgets in plants and animals.[132][146] Wind speed, temperature and moisture content vary as winds travel across different land features and elevations. For example, thewesterlies come into contact with thecoastal and interior mountains of western North America to produce arain shadow on the leeward side of the mountain. The air expands and moisture condenses as the winds increase in elevation; this is calledorographic lift and can cause precipitation. This environmental process produces spatial divisions in biodiversity, as species adapted to wetter conditions are range-restricted to the coastal mountain valleys and unable to migrate across thexeric ecosystems to intermix with sister lineages that are segregated to the interior mountain systems.[147][148]

Fire

[edit]
Main article:Fire ecology
Forest fires modify the land by leaving behind an environmental mosaic that diversifies the landscape into differentseral stages and habitats of varied quality (left). Some species are adapted to forest fires, such as pine trees that open their cones only after fire exposure (right).

Plants convert carbon dioxide into biomass and emit oxygen into the atmosphere. By approximately 350 million years ago (the end of theDevonian period), photosynthesis had brought the concentration of atmospheric oxygen above 17%, which allowed combustion to occur.[149] Fire releases CO2 and converts fuel into ash and tar. Fire is a significant ecological parameter that raises many issues pertaining to its control and suppression.[150] While the issue of fire in relation to ecology and plants has been recognized for a long time,[151]Charles Cooper brought attention to the issue of forest fires in relation to the ecology of forest fire suppression and management in the 1960s.[152][153]

Soils

[edit]
Main article:Soil ecology

Soil is the living top layer of mineral and organic dirt that covers the surface of the planet. It is the chief organizing centre of most ecosystem functions, and it is of critical importance in agricultural science and ecology. Thedecomposition of dead organic matter (for example, leaves on the forest floor), results in soils containingminerals and nutrients that feed into plant production. The whole of the planet's soil ecosystems is called thepedosphere where a large biomass of the Earth's biodiversity organizes into trophic levels. Invertebrates that feed and shred larger leaves, for example, create smaller bits for smaller organisms in the feeding chain. Collectively, these organisms are thedetritivores that regulate soil formation.[154][155] Soils form composite phenotypes where inorganic matter is enveloped into the physiology of a whole community. As organisms feed and migrate through soils they physically displace materials, an ecological process calledbioturbation. This aerates soils and stimulates heterotrophic growth and production. Soilmicroorganisms are influenced by and are fed back into the trophic dynamics of the ecosystem.[156][157]

Biogeochemistry and climate

[edit]
Main article:Biogeochemistry

Ecologists study nutrient budgets to understand how these materials are regulated, flow, andrecycled through the environment.[82][83][131] This research has led to an understanding that there is global feedback between ecosystems and the physical parameters of this planet, including minerals, soil, pH, ions, water, and atmospheric gases. Six major elements (hydrogen,carbon,nitrogen,oxygen,sulfur, andphosphorus; H, C, N, O, S, and P) form the constitution of all biological macromolecules and feed into the Earth's geochemical processes. From the smallest scale of biology, the combined effect of billions of ecological processes amplify and regulate thebiogeochemical cycles of the Earth.[158]

History

[edit]
Main article:History of ecology

Early beginnings

[edit]

By ecology, we mean the whole science of the relations of the organism to the environment including, in the broad sense, all the "conditions of existence". Thus, the theory of evolution explains the housekeeping relations of organisms mechanistically as the necessary consequences of effectual causes; and so forms themonistic groundwork of ecology.

Ernst Haeckel (1866)[159]: 140 [B]

Ecology has a complex origin.[160] Ancient Greek philosophers such asHippocrates andAristotle recorded observations on natural history. However, they saw species as unchanging, while varieties were seen as aberrations. Modern ecology sees varieties as the real phenomena, leading to adaptation bynatural selection.[38][161][162] Ecological concepts such as a balance and regulation in nature can be traced toHerodotus (diedc. 425 BC), who describedmutualism in his observation of "natural dentistry". BaskingNile crocodiles, he noted, opened their mouths to givesandpipers safe access to pluckleeches out, giving nutrition to the sandpiper and oral hygiene for the crocodile.[160] Aristotle and his studentTheophrastus observed plant and animal migrations, biogeography, physiology, and their behavior, giving an early analogue to the concept of an ecological niche.[163][164]

Nowhere can one see more clearly illustrated what may be called the sensibility of such an organic complex, – expressed by the fact that whatever affects any species belonging to it, must speedily have its influence of some sort upon the whole assemblage. He will thus be made to see the impossibility of studying any form completely, out of relation to the other forms, – the necessity for taking a comprehensive survey of the whole as a condition to a satisfactory understanding of any part.

Stephen Forbes (1887)[165]

Ernst Haeckel (left) andEugenius Warming (right), two founders of ecology

Ecological concepts such as food chains, population regulation, and productivity were developed in the 1700s, through the works of microscopistAntonie van Leeuwenhoek (1632–1723) and botanistRichard Bradley (1688?–1732).[38] BiogeographerAlexander von Humboldt (1769–1859) recognized ecological gradients, where species are replaced or altered in form alongenvironmental gradients. Humboldt drew inspiration fromIsaac Newton, as he developed a form of "terrestrial physics".[166][167][168] Natural historians, such as Humboldt,James Hutton, andJean-Baptiste Lamarck laid the foundations of ecology.[169] The term "ecology" (German:Oekologie, Ökologie) was coined byErnst Haeckel in his bookGenerelle Morphologie der Organismen (1866).[170] Haeckel was a zoologist, artist, writer, and later in life a professor of comparative anatomy.[159][171]

Linnaeus founded an early branch of ecology that he called the economy of nature.[172] He influenced Charles Darwin, who adopted Linnaeus' phrase inThe Origin of Species.[159] Linnaeus was the first to frame thebalance of nature as a testable hypothesis.[173]

The layout of the first ecological experiment, carried out in a grass garden atWoburn Abbey in 1816, was noted by Charles Darwin inThe Origin of Species. The experiment studied the performance of different mixtures of species planted in different kinds of soils.[174][175]

Since 1900

[edit]

Modern ecology first attracted substantial scientific attention toward the end of the 19th century.Ellen Swallow Richards adopted the term "oekology" in the U.S. as early as 1892.[176] In the early 20th century, ecology transitioned from description to a moreanalytical form ofscientific natural history.[166][169][177]Frederic Clements published the first American ecology book,Research Methods in Ecology in 1905,[178] presenting the idea of plant communities as asuperorganism. This launched a debate between ecological holism and individualism that lasted until the 1970s.[179]

In 1942,Raymond Lindeman wrote a landmark paper on thetrophic dynamics of ecology. Trophic dynamics became the foundation for much work on energy and material flow through ecosystems.Robert MacArthur advanced mathematical theory, predictions, and tests in ecology in the 1950s.[169][180][181]

This whole chain of poisoning, then, seems to rest on a base of minute plants which must have been the original concentrators. But what of the opposite end of the food chain—the human being who, in probable ignorance of all this sequence of events, has rigged his fishing tackle, caught a string of fish from the waters of Clear Lake, and taken them home to fry for his supper?

Rachel Carson (1962)[182]: 48 

Ecology surged in popular and scientific interest during the 1960–1970senvironmental movement.[169] In 1962, marine biologist and ecologistRachel Carson's bookSilent Spring helped to mobilize the environmental movement by alerting the public to toxicpesticides, such asDDT (C14H9Cl5),bioaccumulating in the environment. Since then, ecologists have worked to bridge their understanding of the degradation of the planet's ecosystems with environmental politics, law, restoration, and natural resources management.[20][169][183][184]

See also

[edit]
Lists


Notes

[edit]
  1. ^
    In Ernst Haeckel's (1866) footnote where the term ecology originates, he also gives attribute toAncient Greek:χώρας,romanizedkhōrā,lit.'χωρα', meaning "dwelling place, distributional area" —quoted from Stauffer (1957).
  2. ^
    This is a copy of Haeckel's original definition (Original: Haeckel, E. (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine Grundzige der organischen Formen- Wissenschaft, mechanisch begriindet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie. 2 vols. Reimer, Berlin.) translated and quoted from Stauffer (1957).
  3. ^
    Foster & Clark (2008) note how Smut's holism contrasts starkly against his racial political views as the father ofapartheid.
  4. ^
    First introduced in MacArthur & Wilson's (1967) book of notable mention in the history and theoretical science of ecology,The Theory of Island Biogeography.
  5. ^
    Aristotle wrote about this concept inMetaphysics (Quoted fromThe Internet Classics Archive translation byW. D. Ross. Book VIII, Part 6): "To return to the difficulty which has been stated with respect both to definitions and to numbers, what is the cause of their unity? In the case of all things which have several parts and in which the totality is not, as it were, a mere heap, but the whole is something besides the parts, there is a cause; for even in bodies contact is the cause of unity in some cases and in others viscosity or some other such quality."

References

[edit]
  1. ^S. E. Kingsland, "Foundational Papers: Defining Ecology as a Science", in L. A. Real and J. H. Brown, eds.,Foundations of Ecology: Classic Papers with Commentaries. Chicago: U of Chicago Press, 1991. pp. 1–2.
  2. ^Stadler, B.; Michalzik, B.; Müller, T. (1998). "Linking aphid ecology with nutrient fluxes in a coniferous forest".Ecology.79 (5):1514–1525.doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1514:LAEWNF]2.0.CO;2.ISSN 0012-9658.
  3. ^Humphreys, N. J.; Douglas, A. E. (1997)."Partitioning of symbiotic bacteria between generations of an insect: a quantitative study of aBuchnera sp. in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) reared at different temperatures".Applied and Environmental Microbiology.63 (8):3294–3296.Bibcode:1997ApEnM..63.3294H.doi:10.1128/AEM.63.8.3294-3296.1997.PMC 1389233.PMID 16535678.
  4. ^Liere, Heidi; Jackson, Doug; Vandermeer, John; Wilby, Andrew (20 September 2012)."Ecological Complexity in a Coffee Agroecosystem: Spatial Heterogeneity, Population Persistence and Biological Control".PLOS ONE.7 (9) e45508.Bibcode:2012PLoSO...745508L.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045508.PMC 3447771.PMID 23029061.
  5. ^Steward T.A. Pickett; Jurek Kolasa; Clive G. Jones (1994).Ecological Understanding: The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature. San Diego: Academic Press.ISBN 978-0-12-554720-8.
  6. ^Nachtomy, Ohad; Shavit, Ayelet; Smith, Justin (2002). "Leibnizian organisms, nested individuals, and units of selection".Theory in Biosciences.121 (2):205–230.doi:10.1007/s12064-002-0020-9.S2CID 23760946.
  7. ^Holling, C. S. (2004). "Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems".Ecosystems.4 (5):390–405.doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5.S2CID 7432683.
  8. ^Levin, S. A. (1999).Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.ISBN 978-0-7382-0319-5.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  9. ^Kiessling, W.; Simpson, C.; Foote, M. (2009)."Reefs as cradles of evolution and sources of biodiversity in the Phanerozoic"(PDF).Science.327 (5962):196–198.Bibcode:2010Sci...327..196K.doi:10.1126/science.1182241.PMID 20056888.S2CID 206523585.Archived(PDF) from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved12 April 2020.
  10. ^Noss, R. F. (1990). "Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach".Conservation Biology.4 (4):355–364.Bibcode:1990ConBi...4..355N.doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x.JSTOR 2385928.
  11. ^abScholes, R. J.; Mace, G. M.; Turner, W.; Geller, G. N.; Jürgens, N.; Larigauderie, A.; Muchoney, D.; Walther, B. A.; Mooney, H. A. (2008)."Toward a global biodiversity observing system"(PDF).Science.321 (5892):1044–1045.doi:10.1126/science.1162055.PMID 18719268.S2CID 206514712. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 July 2011.
  12. ^abCardinale, Bradley J.; Duffy, J. Emmett; Gonzalez, Andrew; Hooper, David U.; Perrings, Charles; Venail, Patrick; Narwani, Anita; Mace, Georgina M.; Tilman, David; Wardle, David A.; Kinzig, Ann P.; Daily, Gretchen C.; Loreau, Michel; Grace, James B.; Larigauderie, Anne; Srivastava, Diane S.; Naeem, Shahid (6 June 2012)."Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity"(PDF).Nature.486 (7401):59–67.Bibcode:2012Natur.486...59C.doi:10.1038/nature11148.PMID 22678280.S2CID 4333166.Archived(PDF) from the original on 21 September 2017. Retrieved10 August 2019.
  13. ^Wilson, E. O. (2000). "A global biodiversity map".Science.289 (5488): 2279.PMID 11041790.
  14. ^Purvis, A.; Hector, A. (2000)."Getting the measure of biodiversity"(PDF).Nature.405 (6783):212–218.doi:10.1038/35012221.PMID 10821281.S2CID 4333920. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 28 April 2014.
  15. ^Ostfeld, R. S. (2009)."Biodiversity loss and the rise of zoonotic pathogens".Clinical Microbiology and Infection.15 (s1):40–43.doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02691.x.PMID 19220353.
  16. ^Tierney, Geraldine L.; Faber-Langendoen, Don; Mitchell, Brian R.; Shriver, W. Gregory; Gibbs, James P. (2009)."Monitoring and evaluating the ecological integrity of forest ecosystems"(PDF).Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.7 (6):308–316.Bibcode:2009FrEE....7..308T.doi:10.1890/070176. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 29 December 2010. Retrieved1 February 2010.
  17. ^Ceballos, G.; Ehrlich, P. R. (2002)."Mammal population losses and the extinction crisis"(PDF).Science.296 (5569):904–907.Bibcode:2002Sci...296..904C.doi:10.1126/science.1069349.PMID 11988573.S2CID 32115412. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 20 July 2011. Retrieved16 March 2010.
  18. ^Palumbi, Stephen R.; Sandifer, Paul A.; Allan, J. David; Beck, Michael W.; Fautin, Daphne G.; Fogarty, Michael J.; Halpern, Benjamin S.; Incze, Lewis S.; Leong, Jo-Ann; et al. (2009)."Managing for ocean biodiversity to sustain marine ecosystem services"(PDF).Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.7 (4):204–211.Bibcode:2009FrEE....7..204P.doi:10.1890/070135.hdl:1808/13308. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 11 June 2010.
  19. ^Wilcove, D. S.; Wikelski, M. (2008)."Going, going, gone: Is animal migration disappearing".PLOS Biology.6 (7) e188.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060188.PMC 2486312.PMID 18666834.
  20. ^abHammond, H. (2009).Maintaining Whole Systems on the Earth's Crown: Ecosystem-based Conservation Planning for the Boreal Forest. Slocan Park, BC: Silva Forest Foundation. p. 380.ISBN 978-0-9734779-0-0. Archived fromthe original on 5 December 2009. Retrieved31 January 2010.
  21. ^Whittaker, R. H.; Levin, S. A.; Root, R. B. (1973)."Niche, habitat, and ecotope"(PDF).The American Naturalist.107 (955):321–338.Bibcode:1973ANat..107..321W.doi:10.1086/282837.S2CID 84504783. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 5 September 2012.
  22. ^Beyer, Hawthorne L.; Haydon, Daniel T.; Morales, Juan M.; Frair, Jacqueline L.; Hebblewhite, Mark; Mitchell, Michael; Matthiopoulos, Jason (2010)."The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.365 (1550):2245–2254.doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0083.PMC 2894962.PMID 20566501.
  23. ^Laland, K. N.; Odling-Smee, F. J.; Feldman, M. W. (1999)."Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.96 (18):10242–10247.Bibcode:1999PNAS...9610242L.doi:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10242.PMC 17873.PMID 10468593.
  24. ^Hughes, D. P.; Pierce, N. E.; Boomsma, J. J. (2008)."Social insect symbionts: evolution in homeostatic fortresses"(PDF).Trends in Ecology & Evolution.23 (12):672–677.Bibcode:2008TEcoE..23..672H.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.011.PMID 18951653. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 6 June 2011. Retrieved28 January 2010.
  25. ^abcWiens, J. J.; Graham, C. H. (2005)."Niche conservatism: Integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology"(PDF).Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.36:519–539.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 24 October 2012.
  26. ^Hutchinson, G. E. (1957). "Concluding remarks".Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.22 (797):415–427.doi:10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039.
  27. ^abBegon, M.; Townsend, C. R.; Harper, J. L. (2005).Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. p. 752.ISBN 1-4051-1117-8. Archived fromthe original on 30 October 2013. Retrieved14 December 2010.
  28. ^D. L., Hardesty (1975). "The niche concept: suggestions for its use in human ecology".Human Ecology.3 (2):71–85.Bibcode:1975HumEc...3...71H.doi:10.1007/BF01552263.JSTOR 4602315.S2CID 84328940.
  29. ^Hastings, Alan; Byers, James E.; Crooks, Jeffrey A.; Cuddington, Kim; Jones, Clive G.; Lambrinos, John G.; Talley, Theresa S.; Wilson, William G. (2007). "Ecosystem engineering in space and time".Ecology Letters.10 (2):153–164.Bibcode:2007EcolL..10..153H.doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00997.x.PMID 17257103.S2CID 44870405.
  30. ^Jones, Clive G.; Lawton, John H.; Shachak, Moshe (1994). "Organisms as ecosystem engineers".Oikos.69 (3):373–386.Bibcode:1994Oikos..69..373J.doi:10.2307/3545850.JSTOR 3545850.
  31. ^Palmer, M.; White, P. S. (1994)."On the existence of ecological communities"(PDF).Journal of Vegetation Sciences.5 (2):279–282.Bibcode:1994JVegS...5..279P.doi:10.2307/3236162.JSTOR 3236162. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 5 September 2012.
  32. ^Prentice; I. C.; Harrison, S. P.; Leemans, R.; Monserud, R. A.; Solomon, A. M. (1992)."Special paper: A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate"(PDF).Journal of Biogeography.19 (2):117–134.Bibcode:1992JBiog..19..117P.doi:10.2307/2845499.JSTOR 2845499.Archived(PDF) from the original on 20 December 2022. Retrieved11 December 2022.
  33. ^Turnbaugh, Peter J.; Ley, Ruth E.; Hamady, Micah; Fraser-Liggett, Claire M.; Knight, Rob; Gordon, Jeffrey I. (2007)."The human microbiome project".Nature.449 (7164):804–810.Bibcode:2007Natur.449..804T.doi:10.1038/nature06244.PMC 3709439.PMID 17943116.
  34. ^DeLong, E. F. (2009)."The microbial ocean from genomes to biomes"(PDF).Nature.459 (7244):200–206.Bibcode:2009Natur.459..200D.doi:10.1038/nature08059.hdl:1721.1/69838.PMID 19444206.S2CID 205216984. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 18 July 2011. Retrieved14 January 2010.
  35. ^Igamberdiev, Abir U.; Lea, P. J. (2006)."Land plants equilibrate O2 and CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere"(PDF).Photosynthesis Research.87 (2):177–194.Bibcode:2006PhoRe..87..177I.doi:10.1007/s11120-005-8388-2.PMID 16432665.S2CID 10709679. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 3 March 2016.
  36. ^Lovelock, J.E.; Margulis, L. (1974)."Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the gaia hypothesis".Tellus A.26 (1–2):2–10.Bibcode:1974Tell...26....2L.doi:10.3402/tellusa.v26i1-2.9731.S2CID 129803613.
  37. ^abcLovelock, J. (2003). "The living Earth".Nature.426 (6968):769–770.Bibcode:2003Natur.426..769L.doi:10.1038/426769a.PMID 14685210.S2CID 30308855.
  38. ^abcdefghOdum, E. P.; Barrett, G. W. (2005).Fundamentals of Ecology. Brooks Cole. p. 598.ISBN 978-0-534-42066-6.Archived from the original on 28 July 2020. Retrieved6 January 2020.
  39. ^Waples, R. S.; Gaggiotti, O. (2006)."What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity".Molecular Ecology.15 (6):1419–1439.doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02890.x.PMID 16629801.S2CID 9715923.Archived from the original on 25 October 2019. Retrieved10 August 2019.
  40. ^abcTurchin, P. (2001). "Does population ecology have general laws?".Oikos.94 (1):17–26.Bibcode:2001Oikos..94...17T.doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.11310.x.S2CID 27090414.
  41. ^abVandermeer, J. H.; Goldberg, D. E. (2003).Population Ecology: First Principles. Woodstock, Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.ISBN 0-691-11440-4.
  42. ^Berryman, A. A. (1992). "The origins and evolution of predator-prey theory".Ecology.73 (5):1530–1535.Bibcode:1992Ecol...73.1530B.doi:10.2307/1940005.JSTOR 1940005.S2CID 84321947.
  43. ^Anderson, D. R.; Burnham, K. P.; Thompson, W. L. (2000)."Null hypotheses testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative"(PDF).J. Wildl. Manage.64 (4):912–923.doi:10.2307/3803199.JSTOR 3803199. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2 June 2013. Retrieved4 August 2012.
  44. ^Johnson, J. B.; Omland, K. S. (2004)."Model selection in ecology and evolution"(PDF).Trends in Ecology and Evolution.19 (2):101–108.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.401.777.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013.PMID 16701236.Archived(PDF) from the original on 14 October 2012.
  45. ^Levins, R. (1969)."Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control".Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America.15 (3):237–240.doi:10.1093/besa/15.3.237.Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved19 November 2020.
  46. ^Levins, R. (1970). "Extinction". In Gerstenhaber, M. (ed.).Some Mathematical Questions in Biology. American Mathematical Soc. pp. 77–107.ISBN 978-0-8218-1152-8.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  47. ^Smith, M. A.; Green, D. M. (2005)."Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: Are all amphibian populations metapopulations?".Ecography.28 (1):110–128.Bibcode:2005Ecogr..28..110A.doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x.
  48. ^Hanski, I. (1998)."Metapopulation dynamics"(PDF).Nature.396 (6706):41–49.Bibcode:1998Natur.396...41H.doi:10.1038/23876.S2CID 4405264. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 31 December 2010.
  49. ^Nebel, S. (2010)."Animal migration".Nature Education Knowledge.10 (1): 29.Archived from the original on 16 July 2011.
  50. ^Clark, J. S.; Fastie, C.; Hurtt, G.; Jackson, S. T.; Johnson, C.; King, G. A.; Lewis, M.; Lynch, J.; Pacala, S.; et al. (1998)."Reid's paradox of rapid plant migration"(PDF).BioScience.48 (1):13–24.doi:10.2307/1313224.JSTOR 1313224.Archived(PDF) from the original on 6 July 2011.
  51. ^Dingle, H. (18 January 1996).Migration: The Biology of Life on the Move. Oxford University Press. p. 480.ISBN 0-19-509723-8.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  52. ^abJohnson, M. T.; Strinchcombe, J. R. (2007). "An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology".Trends in Ecology and Evolution.22 (5):250–257.Bibcode:2007TEcoE..22..250J.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.01.014.PMID 17296244.
  53. ^Tansley, A. G. (1935)."The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms"(PDF).Ecology.16 (3):284–307.Bibcode:1935Ecol...16..284T.doi:10.2307/1930070.JSTOR 1930070. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 26 July 2011.
  54. ^Marsh, G. P. (1864).Man and Nature: Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. p. 560.
  55. ^O'Neil, R. V. (2001)."Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (With full military honors, of course!)"(PDF).Ecology.82 (12):3275–3284.doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3275:IITTBT]2.0.CO;2.ISSN 0012-9658. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 19 May 2011. Retrieved20 June 2011.
  56. ^Brinson, M. M.; Lugo, A. E.; Brown, S (1981). "Primary Productivity, Decomposition and Consumer Activity in Freshwater Wetlands".Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.12 (1):123–161.Bibcode:1981AnRES..12..123B.doi:10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001011.
  57. ^O'Neill, D. L.; Deangelis, D. L.; Waide, J. B.; Allen, T. F. H. (1986).A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton University Press. p. 253.ISBN 0-691-08436-X.
  58. ^Pimm, S. (2002).Food Webs. University of Chicago Press. p. 258.ISBN 978-0-226-66832-1.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  59. ^Pimm, S. L.; Lawton, J. H.; Cohen, J. E. (1991)."Food web patterns and their consequences"(PDF).Nature.350 (6320):669–674.Bibcode:1991Natur.350..669P.doi:10.1038/350669a0.S2CID 4267587. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 June 2010.
  60. ^Hairston, N. G. Jr.; Hairston, N. G. Sr. (1993)."Cause-effect relationships in energy flow, trophic structure, and interspecific interactions"(PDF).The American Naturalist.142 (3):379–411.Bibcode:1993ANat..142..379H.doi:10.1086/285546.hdl:1813/57238.S2CID 55279332. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 20 July 2011.
  61. ^Duffy, J. Emmett; Cardinale, Bradley J.; France, Kristin E.; McIntyre, Peter B.; Thébault, Elisa; Loreau, Michel (2007)."The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity".Ecology Letters.10 (6):522–538.Bibcode:2007EcolL..10..522D.doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01037.x.PMID 17498151.Archived from the original on 5 March 2020. Retrieved7 December 2019.
  62. ^Elton, C. S. (1927).Animal Ecology. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.ISBN 0-226-20639-4.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  63. ^Davic, R. D. (2003)."Linking keystone species and functional groups: a new operational definition of the keystone species concept"(PDF).Conservation Ecology.7 (1) resp11: r11.doi:10.5751/ES-00502-0701r11.hdl:10535/2966.Archived(PDF) from the original on 30 July 2020. Retrieved24 September 2019.
  64. ^Oksanen, L. (1991). "Trophic levels and trophic dynamics: A consensus emerging?".Trends in Ecology and Evolution.6 (2):58–60.Bibcode:1991TEcoE...6...58O.doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91)90124-G.PMID 21232425.
  65. ^Loehle, C.; Pechmann, Joseph H. K. (1988). "Evolution: The missing ingredient in systems ecology".The American Naturalist.132 (9):884–899.Bibcode:1988ANat..132..884L.doi:10.1086/284895.JSTOR 2462267.S2CID 85120393.
  66. ^Ulanowicz, R. E.; Kemp, W. Michael (1979)."Toward canonical trophic aggregations"(PDF).The American Naturalist.114 (6):871–883.Bibcode:1979ANat..114..871U.doi:10.1086/283534.hdl:1834/19829.JSTOR 2460557.S2CID 85371147.Archived(PDF) from the original on 1 November 2018. Retrieved10 August 2019.
  67. ^Li, B. (2000). "Why is the holistic approach becoming so important in landscape ecology?".Landscape and Urban Planning.50 (1–3):27–41.Bibcode:2000LUrbP..50...27L.doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00078-5.
  68. ^Polis, G. A.; Strong, D. R. (1996)."Food web complexity and community dynamics"(PDF).The American Naturalist.147 (5):813–846.Bibcode:1996ANat..147..813P.doi:10.1086/285880.S2CID 85155900. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 20 July 2011.
  69. ^Thompson, R. M.; Hemberg, M.; Starzomski, B. M.; Shurin, J. B. (2007)."Trophic levels and trophic tangles: The prevalence of omnivory in real food webs"(PDF).Ecology.88 (3):612–617.Bibcode:2007Ecol...88..612T.doi:10.1890/05-1454.PMID 17503589. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 15 August 2011.
  70. ^Fischer, J.; Lindenmayer, D. B.; Manning, A. D. (2006)."Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes"(PDF).Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.4 (2):80–86.doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0080:BEFART]2.0.CO;2.ISSN 1540-9295. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 6 July 2011. Retrieved2 February 2010.
  71. ^Libralato, S.; Christensen, V.; Pauly, D. (2006)."A method for identifying keystone species in food web models"(PDF).Ecological Modelling.195 (3–4):153–171.Bibcode:2006EcMod.195..153L.doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.029. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 19 May 2012.
  72. ^Paine, R. T. (January 1969). "A Note on Trophic Complexity and Community Stability".The American Naturalist.103 (929):91–93.Bibcode:1969ANat..103...91P.doi:10.1086/282586.S2CID 83780992.
  73. ^Mills, L. S.; Soule, M. E.; Doak, D. F. (1993)."The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation".BioScience.43 (4):219–224.doi:10.2307/1312122.JSTOR 1312122.S2CID 85204808.
  74. ^Novikoff, A. B. (1945)."The concept of integrative levels and biology"(PDF).Science.101 (2618):209–215.Bibcode:1945Sci...101..209N.doi:10.1126/science.101.2618.209.PMID 17814095. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 15 May 2011.
  75. ^Schneider, D. D. (2001)."The rise of the concept of scale in ecology"(PDF).BioScience.51 (7):545–553.doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0545:TROTCO]2.0.CO;2.ISSN 0006-3568.Archived(PDF) from the original on 3 March 2016.
  76. ^Molnar, J.; Marvier, M.; Kareiva, P. (2004). "The sum is greater than the parts".Conservation Biology.18 (6):1670–1671.Bibcode:2004ConBi..18.1670M.doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00l07.x.S2CID 40349801.
  77. ^Loehle, C. (2004). "Challenges of ecological complexity".Ecological Complexity.1 (1):3–6.Bibcode:2004EcoCm...1....3..doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2003.09.001.
  78. ^Odum, E. P. (1977). "The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline".Science.195 (4284):1289–1293.Bibcode:1977Sci...195.1289O.doi:10.1126/science.195.4284.1289.PMID 17738398.S2CID 36862823.
  79. ^Liu, J.; Dietz, Thomas; Carpenter, Stephen R.; Folke, Carl; Alberti, Marina; Redman, Charles L.; Schneider, Stephen H.; Ostrom, Elinor; Pell, Alice N.; et al. (2009)."Coupled human and natural systems"(PDF).Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment.36 (8):639–649.doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[639:CHANS]2.0.CO;2.ISSN 0044-7447.PMID 18240679.S2CID 18167083. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 9 August 2011.
  80. ^Miles, D. B.; Dunham, A. E. (1993). "Historical perspectives in ecology and evolutionary biology: The use of phylogenetic comparative analyses".Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.24 (1):587–619.Bibcode:1993AnRES..24..587M.doi:10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.003103.
  81. ^Levins, R.; Lewontin, R. (1980)."Dialectics and reductionism in ecology"(PDF).Synthese.43:47–78.doi:10.1007/bf00413856.S2CID 46984334. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 May 2013.
  82. ^abcdefghAllee, W. C.; Park, O.; Emerson, A. E.; Park, T.; Schmidt, K. P. (1949).Principles of Animal Ecology. W. B. Sunders, Co. p. 837.ISBN 0-7216-1120-6.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  83. ^abcdeRickleffs, Robert E. (1996).The Economy of Nature. University of Chicago Press. p. 678.ISBN 0-7167-3847-3.
  84. ^Yoshida, T (2003). "Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system".Nature.424 (6946). Nature Publishing Group:303–306.Bibcode:2003Natur.424..303Y.doi:10.1038/nature01767.PMID 12867979.S2CID 4425455.
  85. ^Stuart-Fox, D.; Moussalli, A. (2008)."Selection for social signalling drives the evolution of chameleon colour change".PLOS Biology.6 (1) e25.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060025.PMC 2214820.PMID 18232740.
  86. ^Karban, R. (2008)."Plant behaviour and communication".Ecology Letters.11 (7):727–739.Bibcode:2008EcolL..11..727K.doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01183.x.PMID 18400016.
  87. ^Tinbergen, N. (1963)."On aims and methods of ethology"(PDF).Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie.20 (4):410–433.Bibcode:1963Ethol..20..410T.doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x.Archived(PDF) from the original on 9 June 2011.
  88. ^Hamner, W. M. (1985)."The importance of ethology for investigations of marine zooplankton".Bulletin of Marine Science.37 (2):414–424.Archived from the original on 7 June 2011.
  89. ^abStrassmann, J. E.; Zhu, Y.; Queller, D. C. (2000). "Altruism and social cheating in the social amoebaDictyostelium discoideum".Nature.408 (6815):965–967.Bibcode:2000Natur.408..965S.doi:10.1038/35050087.PMID 11140681.S2CID 4307980.
  90. ^Sakurai, K. (1985). "An attelabid weevil (Euops splendida) cultivates fungi".Journal of Ethology.3 (2):151–156.doi:10.1007/BF02350306.S2CID 30261494.
  91. ^Anderson, J. D. (1961). "The courtship behaviour ofAmbystoma macrodactylum croceum".Copeia.1961 (2):132–139.doi:10.2307/1439987.JSTOR 1439987.
  92. ^"Behavioral Ecology". International Society for Behavioral Ecology. Archived fromthe original on 10 April 2011. Retrieved15 April 2011.
  93. ^Gould, Stephen J.; Vrba, Elizabeth S. (1982). "Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form".Paleobiology.8 (1):4–15.Bibcode:1982Pbio....8....4G.doi:10.1017/S0094837300004310.S2CID 86436132.
  94. ^abcdWilson, Edward. O. (2000).Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (25th anniversary ed.). President and Fellows of Harvard College.ISBN 978-0-674-00089-6.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  95. ^Adrian G Palacios,Francisco Bozinovic; Bozinovic (2003)."An "enactive" approach to integrative and comparative biology: Thoughts on the table".Biology Research.36 (1):95–99.doi:10.4067/S0716-97602003000100008.hdl:10533/174736.PMID 12795209.
  96. ^Reuven Dukas (1998)."§1.3 Why study cognitive ecology?". In Reuven Dukas (ed.).Cognitive Ecology: The Evolutionary Ecology of Information Processing and Decision Making. University of Chicago Press. p. 4.ISBN 978-0-226-16932-3.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  97. ^Reuven Dukas; John M. Ratcliffe (2009)."Introduction". In Reuven Dukas; John M. Ratcliffe (eds.).Cognitive Ecology II. University of Chicago Press. pp. 1ff.ISBN 978-0-226-16937-8.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.Cognitive ecology focuses on the ecology and evolution of "cognition" defined as the neuronal processes concerned with the acquisition, retention, and use of information....we ought to rely on ecological and evolutionary knowledge for studying cognition.
  98. ^Sherman, P. W.; Lacey, E. A.; Reeve, H. K.; Keller, L. (1995)."The eusociality continuum"(PDF).Behavioral Ecology.6 (1):102–108.doi:10.1093/beheco/6.1.102.PMID 21237927. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 19 July 2011.
  99. ^Wilson, D. S.; Wilson, E. O. (2007). "Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology".The Quarterly Review of Biology.82 (4):327–348.doi:10.1086/522809.PMID 18217526.S2CID 37774648.
  100. ^Page, R. D. M. (1991). "Clocks, clades, and cospeciation: Comparing rates of evolution and timing of cospeciation events in host-parasite assemblages".Systematic Zoology.40 (2):188–198.doi:10.2307/2992256.JSTOR 2992256.
  101. ^Herre, E. A.; Knowlton, N.; Mueller, U. G.; Rehner, S. A. (1999)."The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation"(PDF).Trends in Ecology and Evolution.14 (2):49–53.doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01529-8.PMID 10234251. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 20 September 2009.
  102. ^Gilbert, F. S. (1990).Insect life cycles: Genetics, evolution, and co-ordination. New York: Springer-Verlag. p. 258.ISBN 0-387-19550-5.Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved6 January 2020.
  103. ^Kiers, E. T.; van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2006)."Mutualistic stability in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Exploring hypotheses of evolutionary cooperation"(PDF).Ecology.87 (7):1627–1636.doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1627:MSITAM]2.0.CO;2.ISSN 0012-9658.PMID 16922314. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 16 October 2009. Retrieved31 December 2009.
  104. ^abParenti, L. R.; Ebach, M. C. (2009).Comparative Biogeography: Discovering and Classifying Biogeographical Patterns of a Dynamic Earth. London: University of California Press.ISBN 978-0-520-25945-4.Archived from the original on 11 September 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  105. ^"Journal of Biogeography – Overview". Wiley.doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2699.Archived from the original on 9 February 2013. Retrieved16 March 2018.
  106. ^MacArthur, R.; Wilson, E. O. (1967).The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  107. ^abWiens, J. J.; Donoghue, M. J. (2004)."Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness"(PDF).Trends in Ecology and Evolution.19 (12):639–644.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011.PMID 16701326. Archived from the original on 1 June 2010.
  108. ^Morrone, J. J.; Crisci, J. V. (1995). "Historical biogeography: Introduction to methods".Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.26 (1):373–401.Bibcode:1995AnRES..26..373M.doi:10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.002105.S2CID 55258511.
  109. ^Svenning, Jens-Christian; Condi, R. (2008). "Biodiversity in a warmer world".Science.322 (5899):206–207.doi:10.1126/science.1164542.PMID 18845738.S2CID 27131917.
  110. ^Landhäusser, Simon M.; Deshaies, D.; Lieffers, V. J. (2009). "Disturbance facilitates rapid range expansion of aspen into higher elevations of the Rocky Mountains under a warming climate".Journal of Biogeography.37 (1):68–76.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02182.x.S2CID 82859453.
  111. ^Reznick, D.; Bryant, M. J.; Bashey, F. (2002)."r- and K-selection revisited: The role of population regulation in life-history evolution"(PDF).Ecology.83 (6):1509–1520.doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1509:RAKSRT]2.0.CO;2.ISSN 0012-9658. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 30 December 2010. Retrieved27 January 2010.
  112. ^Rieseberg, L. (ed.). "Molecular Ecology".Molecular Ecology. Wiley.doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1365-294X.
  113. ^Avise, J. (1994).Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Kluwer Academic Publishers.ISBN 0-412-03771-8.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  114. ^Rachel Carson (1962).""Silent Spring" (excerpt)". Houghton Mifflin.Archived from the original on 14 October 2012. Retrieved4 October 2012.
  115. ^abYoung, G. L. (1974). "Human ecology as an interdisciplinary concept: A critical inquiry".Advances in Ecological Research Volume 8. Vol. 8. pp. 1–105.doi:10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60277-9.ISBN 978-0-12-013908-8.
  116. ^Gross, M. (2004)."Human geography and ecological sociology: the unfolding of human ecology, 1890 to 1930 – and beyond".Social Science History.28 (4):575–605.doi:10.1017/S0145553200012852.S2CID 233365777.
  117. ^Grumbine, R. E. (1994)."What is ecosystem management?"(PDF).Conservation Biology.8 (1):27–38.Bibcode:1994ConBi...8...27G.doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010027.x. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2 May 2013.
  118. ^Wilson, E. O. (1992).The Diversity of Life. Harvard University Press. p. 440.ISBN 978-0-674-05817-0.
  119. ^Mason, H. L.; Langenheim, J. H. (1957). "Language analysis and the concept "environment"".Ecology.38 (2):325–340.Bibcode:1957Ecol...38..325M.doi:10.2307/1931693.JSTOR 1931693.
  120. ^Kleese, D. A. (2001). "Nature and nature in Psychology".Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology.21:61–79.doi:10.1037/h0091199.
  121. ^Campbell, Neil A.; Williamson, Brad; Heyden, Robin J. (2006).Biology: Exploring Life. Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson Prentice Hall.ISBN 0-13-250882-6.Archived from the original on 2 November 2014.
  122. ^abHughes, A. R."Disturbance and diversity: an ecological chicken and egg problem".Nature Education Knowledge.1 (8): 26.Archived from the original on 5 December 2010.
  123. ^Levin, S. A. (1992)."The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award".Ecology.73 (6):1943–1967.doi:10.2307/1941447.JSTOR 1941447.
  124. ^Holling, C. S. (1973)."Resilience and stability of ecological systems"(PDF).Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.4 (1):1–23.Bibcode:1973AnRES...4....1H.doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.JSTOR 2096802.S2CID 53309505.Archived(PDF) from the original on 17 March 2020. Retrieved10 August 2019.
  125. ^abFolke, C.; Carpenter, S.; Walker, B.; Scheffer, M.; Elmqvist, T.; Gunderson, L.; Holling, C.S. (2004)."Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management"(PDF).Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.35:557–581.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.489.8717.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711.JSTOR 2096802. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 18 October 2012.
  126. ^Morgan Ernest, S. K.; Enquist, Brian J.; Brown, James H.; Charnov, Eric L.; Gillooly, James F.; Savage, Van M.; White, Ethan P.; Smith, Felisa A.; Hadly, Elizabeth A.; Haskell, John P.; Lyons, S. Kathleen; Maurer, Brian A.; Niklas, Karl J.; Tiffney, Bruce (2003)."Thermodynamic and metabolic effects on the scaling of production and population energy use"(PDF).Ecology Letters.6 (11):990–995.Bibcode:2003EcolL...6..990E.doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00526.x. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 8 June 2011. Retrieved6 September 2009.
  127. ^Allègre, Claude J.; Manhès, Gérard; Göpel, Christa (1995). "The age of the Earth".Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.59 (8):1455–1456.Bibcode:1995GeCoA..59.1445A.doi:10.1016/0016-7037(95)00054-4.
  128. ^Wills, C.; Bada, J. (2001).The Spark of Life: Darwin and the Primeval Soup. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.ISBN 978-0-7382-0493-2.
  129. ^abGoldblatt, Colin; Lenton, Timothy M.; Watson, Andrew J. (2006)."Bistability of atmospheric oxygen and the Great Oxidation"(PDF).Nature.443 (7112):683–686.Bibcode:2006Natur.443..683G.doi:10.1038/nature05169.PMID 17036001.S2CID 4425486. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 20 August 2011.
  130. ^Catling, D. C.; Claire, M. W. (2005)."How Earth's atmosphere evolved to an oxic state: A status report"(PDF).Earth and Planetary Science Letters.237 (1–2):1–20.Bibcode:2005E&PSL.237....1C.doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.013. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 October 2008. Retrieved6 September 2009.
  131. ^abcdKormondy, E. E. (1995).Concepts of Ecology (4th ed.). Benjamin Cummings.ISBN 0-13-478116-3.
  132. ^abcdCronk, J. K.; Fennessy, M. S. (2001).Wetland Plants: Biology and Ecology. Washington, D.C.: Lewis Publishers.ISBN 1-56670-372-7.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  133. ^Evans, D. H.; Piermarini, P. M.; Potts, W. T. W. (1999)."Ionic transport in the fish gill epithelium"(PDF).Journal of Experimental Zoology.283 (7):641–652.Bibcode:1999JEZ...283..641E.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19990601)283:7<641::AID-JEZ3>3.0.CO;2-W. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 26 June 2010. Retrieved9 December 2009.
  134. ^Swenson, N. G.; Enquist, B. J. (2008). "The relationship between stem and branch wood specific gravity and the ability of each measure to predict leaf area".American Journal of Botany.95 (4):516–519.Bibcode:2008AmJB...95..516S.doi:10.3732/ajb.95.4.516.PMID 21632377.S2CID 429191.
  135. ^Gartner, Gabriel E.A.; Hicks, James W.; Manzani, Paulo R.; et al. (2010)."Phylogeny, ecology, and heart position in snakes"(PDF).Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.83 (1):43–54.doi:10.1086/648509.hdl:11449/21150.PMID 19968564.S2CID 16332609. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011.
  136. ^Neri Salvadori; Pasquale Commendatore; Massimo Tamberi (14 May 2014).Geography, structural Change and Economic Development: Theory and Empirics. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  137. ^Jacobsen, D. (2008). "Low oxygen pressure as a driving factor for the altitudinal decline in taxon richness of stream macroinvertebrates".Oecologia.154 (4):795–807.Bibcode:2008Oecol.154..795J.doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0877-x.PMID 17960424.S2CID 484645.
  138. ^Wheeler, T. D.; Stroock, A. D. (2008). "The transpiration of water at negative pressures in a synthetic tree".Nature.455 (7210):208–212.Bibcode:2008Natur.455..208W.doi:10.1038/nature07226.PMID 18784721.S2CID 4404849.
  139. ^Pockman, W. T.; Sperry, J. S.; O'Leary, J. W. (1995). "Sustained and significant negative water pressure in xylem".Nature.378 (6558):715–716.Bibcode:1995Natur.378..715P.doi:10.1038/378715a0.S2CID 31357329.
  140. ^Zimmermann, U.; Schneider, H.; Wegner, L. H.; Wagner, M.; Szimtenings, A.; Haase, F.; Bentrup, F. W. (2002). "What are the driving forces for water lifting in the xylem conduit?".Physiologia Plantarum.114 (3):327–335.Bibcode:2002PPlan.114..327Z.doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1140301.x.PMID 12060254.
  141. ^Kastak, D.; Schusterman, R. J. (1998). "Low-frequency amphibious hearing in pinnipeds: Methods, measurements, noise, and ecology".Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.103 (4):2216–2228.Bibcode:1998ASAJ..103.2216K.doi:10.1121/1.421367.PMID 9566340.S2CID 19008897.
  142. ^Friedman, J.; Harder, L. D. (2004)."Inflorescence architecture and wind pollination in six grass species"(PDF).Functional Ecology.18 (6):851–860.Bibcode:2004FuEco..18..851F.doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00921.x.S2CID 20160390. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 6 July 2011.
  143. ^Harder, L. D.; Johnson, S. D. (2009)."Darwin's beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation".New Phytologist.183 (3):530–545.Bibcode:2009NewPh.183..530H.doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02914.x.PMID 19552694.
  144. ^Shimeta, J.; Jumars, P. A.; Lessard, E. J. (1995)."Influences of turbulence on suspension feeding by planktonic protozoa; experiments in laminar shear fields".Limnology and Oceanography.40 (5):845–859.Bibcode:1995LimOc..40..845S.doi:10.4319/lo.1995.40.5.0845.
  145. ^Etemad-Shahidi, A.; Imberger, J. (2001)."Anatomy of turbulence in thermally stratified lakes".Limnology and Oceanography.46 (5):1158–1170.Bibcode:2001LimOc..46.1158E.doi:10.4319/lo.2001.46.5.1158.hdl:10072/426332.
  146. ^Wolf, B. O.; Walsberg, G. E. (2006). "Thermal effects of radiation and wind on a small bird and implications for microsite selection".Ecology.77 (7):2228–2236.doi:10.2307/2265716.JSTOR 2265716.
  147. ^Daubenmire, R. (1975). "Floristic plant geography of eastern Washington and northern Idaho".Journal of Biogeography.2 (1):1–18.Bibcode:1975JBiog...2....1D.doi:10.2307/3038197.JSTOR 3038197.
  148. ^Steele, C. A.; Carstens, B. C.; Storfer, A.; Sullivan, J. (2005)."Testing hypotheses of speciation timing inDicamptodon copei andDicamptodon aterrimus (Caudata: Dicamptodontidae)"(PDF).Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.36 (1):90–100.Bibcode:2005MolPE..36...90S.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.12.001.PMID 15904859. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 14 August 2010.
  149. ^Lenton, T. M.; Watson, A. (2000)."Redfield revisited. 2. What regulates the oxygen content of the atmosphere".Global Biogeochemical Cycles.14 (1):249–268.Bibcode:2000GBioC..14..249L.doi:10.1029/1999GB900076.
  150. ^Lobert, J. M.; Warnatz, J. (1993)."Emissions from the combustion process in vegetation"(PDF). In Crutzen, P. J.; Goldammer, J. G. (eds.).Fire in the Environment: The Ecological, Atmospheric and Climatic Importance of Vegetation Fires. Wiley.ISBN 978-0-471-93604-6. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 6 January 2009. Retrieved11 December 2009.
  151. ^Garren, K. H. (1943). "Effects of fire on vegetation of the southeastern United States".Botanical Review.9 (9):617–654.Bibcode:1943BotRv...9..617G.doi:10.1007/BF02872506.S2CID 31619796.
  152. ^Cooper, C. F. (1960). "Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement".Ecological Monographs.30 (2):130–164.Bibcode:1960EcoM...30..129C.doi:10.2307/1948549.JSTOR 1948549.
  153. ^Cooper, C. F. (1961). "The ecology of fire".Scientific American.204 (4):150–160.Bibcode:1961SciAm.204d.150C.doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0461-150.
  154. ^Coleman, D. C.; Corssley, D. A.; Hendrix, P. F. (2004).Fundamentals of Soil Ecology (2nd ed.). Academic Press.ISBN 0-12-179726-0.Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved27 June 2015.
  155. ^Wilkinson, M. T.; Richards, P. J.; Humphreys, G. S. (2009)."Breaking ground: Pedological, geological, and ecological implications of soil bioturbation"(PDF).Earth-Science Reviews.97 (1–4):257–272.Bibcode:2009ESRv...97..257W.doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.09.005.Archived from the original on 13 April 2020. Retrieved3 August 2012.
  156. ^Phillips, J. D. (2009). "Soils as extended composite phenotypes".Geoderma.149 (1–2):143–151.Bibcode:2009Geode.149..143P.doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.11.028.
  157. ^Reinhardt, L.; Jerolmack, D.; Cardinale, B. J.; Vanacker, V.; Wright, J. (2010)."Dynamic interactions of life and its landscape: Feedbacks at the interface of geomorphology and ecology"(PDF).Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.35 (1):78–101.Bibcode:2010ESPL...35...78R.doi:10.1002/esp.1912.S2CID 14924423. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 17 March 2015. Retrieved2 January 2015.
  158. ^Falkowski, P. G.; Fenchel, T.; Delong, E. F. (2008)."The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles"(PDF).Science.320 (5879):1034–1039.Bibcode:2008Sci...320.1034F.doi:10.1126/science.1153213.PMID 18497287.S2CID 2844984. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 13 April 2020. Retrieved24 October 2017.
  159. ^abcStauffer, R. C. (1957). "Haeckel, Darwin and ecology".The Quarterly Review of Biology.32 (2):138–144.doi:10.1086/401754.S2CID 84079279.
  160. ^abEgerton, F. N. (2001)."A history of the ecological sciences: early Greek origins"(PDF).Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.82 (1):93–97. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 17 August 2012. Retrieved29 September 2010.
  161. ^Benson, Keith R. (2000). "The emergence of ecology from natural history".Endeavour.24 (2):59–62.doi:10.1016/S0160-9327(99)01260-0.PMID 10969480.
  162. ^Sober, E. (1980). "Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism".Philosophy of Science.47 (3):350–383.doi:10.1086/288942.JSTOR 186950.S2CID 170129617.
  163. ^Hughes, J. D. (1985). "Theophrastus as ecologist".Environmental Review.9 (4):296–306.doi:10.2307/3984460.JSTOR 3984460.S2CID 155638387.
  164. ^Hughes, J. D. (1975). "Ecology in ancient Greece".Inquiry.18 (2):115–125.doi:10.1080/00201747508601756.
  165. ^Forbes, S. (1887)."The lake as a microcosm"(PDF).Bulletin of the Scientific Association. Peoria, IL:77–87. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 27 September 2011. Retrieved22 December 2009.
  166. ^abKingsland, S. (2004)."Conveying the intellectual challenge of ecology: An historical perspective"(PDF).Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.2 (7):367–374.doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0367:CTICOE]2.0.CO;2.ISSN 1540-9295. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 August 2011.
  167. ^Rosenzweig, M. L. (2003)."Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity".Oryx.37 (2):194–205.doi:10.1017/s0030605303000371.S2CID 37891678.
  168. ^Hawkins, B. A. (2001). "Ecology's oldest pattern".Endeavor.25 (3):133–134.doi:10.1016/S0160-9327(00)01369-7.PMID 11725309.
  169. ^abcdeMcIntosh, R. P. (1985).The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. Cambridge University Press. p. 400.ISBN 0-521-27087-1.
  170. ^Haeckel, Ernst (1866).Generelle Morphologie der Organismen [The General Morphology of Organisms] (in German). Vol. 2. Berlin, (Germany): Georg Reimer. p. 286.Archived from the original on 18 June 2019. Retrieved27 February 2019.
  171. ^Friederichs, K. (1958). "A definition of ecology and some thoughts about basic concepts".Ecology.39 (1):154–159.Bibcode:1958Ecol...39..154F.doi:10.2307/1929981.JSTOR 1929981.
  172. ^Egerton, F. N. (2007)."A history of the ecological sciences, part 23: Linnaeus and the economy of nature".Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.88 (1):72–88.doi:10.1890/0012-9623(2007)88[72:AHOTES]2.0.CO;2.ISSN 0012-9623.
  173. ^Kormandy, E. J.; Wooster, Donald (1978). "Review: Ecology/economy of nature – synonyms?".Ecology.59 (6):1292–1294.doi:10.2307/1938247.JSTOR 1938247.
  174. ^Hector, A.; Hooper, R. (2002). "Darwin and the first ecological experiment".Science.295 (5555):639–640.doi:10.1126/science.1064815.PMID 11809960.S2CID 82975886.
  175. ^Sinclair, G. (1826)."On cultivating a collection of grasses in pleasure-grounds or flower-gardens, and on the utility of studying the Gramineae".London Gardener's Magazine. Vol. 1. New-Street-Square: A. & R. Spottiswoode. p. 115.Archived from the original on 7 April 2022. Retrieved19 November 2020.
  176. ^Hunt, Caroline Louisa (1912).The life of Ellen H. Richards. Boston:Whitcomb & Barrows.
  177. ^Jones, Madison (8 August 2021)."A Counterhistory of Rhetorical Ecologies".Rhetoric Society Quarterly.51 (4):336–352.doi:10.1080/02773945.2021.1947517.ISSN 0277-3945.S2CID 238358762.
  178. ^Clements, F. E. (1905).Research methods in ecology. Lincoln, Neb.: University Pub. Comp.ISBN 0-405-10381-6.Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved6 January 2020.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  179. ^Gleason, H. A. (1926)."The individualistic concept of the plant association"(PDF).Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club.53 (1):7–26.doi:10.2307/2479933.JSTOR 2479933. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 22 July 2011.
  180. ^Cook, R. E. (1977)."Raymond Lindeman and the trophic-dynamic concept in ecology"(PDF).Science.198 (4312):22–26.Bibcode:1977Sci...198...22C.doi:10.1126/science.198.4312.22.PMID 17741875.S2CID 30340899.Archived(PDF) from the original on 5 October 2012.
  181. ^Odum, E. P. (1968)."Energy flow in ecosystems: A historical review".American Zoologist.8 (1):11–18.doi:10.1093/icb/8.1.11.JSTOR 3881528.
  182. ^Carson, R. (2002).Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Company. p. 348.ISBN 0-618-24906-0.
  183. ^Palamar, C. R. (2008)."The justice of ecological restoration: Environmental history, health, ecology, and justice in the United States"(PDF).Human Ecology Review.15 (1):82–94. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 26 July 2011. Retrieved8 August 2012.
  184. ^Krebs, J. R.; Wilson, J. D.; Bradbury, R. B.; Siriwardena, G. M. (1999)."The second Silent Spring"(PDF).Nature.400 (6745):611–612.Bibcode:1999Natur.400..611K.doi:10.1038/23127.S2CID 9929695. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 31 March 2013.

External links

[edit]
Ecology at Wikipedia'ssister projects
Elements ofnature
Universe
Earth
Weather
Natural environment
Life
See also
See also
‹ Thetemplate below (Biology nav) is being considered for deletion. Seetemplates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›
Biology
Overview
Chemical basis
Cells
Genetics
Evolution
Diversity
Plant form
and function
Animal form
and function
Ecology
Research
methods
Laboratory
techniques
Field techniques
Branches
Glossaries
Atmosphere
Climate
Continents
Culture and society
Environment
Geodesy
Geophysics
Geology
Oceans
Planetary science
Main fields
Related fields
Applications
Lists
See also
General
Producers
Consumers
Decomposers
Microorganisms
Food webs
Example webs
Processes
Defense,
counter
Ecology:Modelling ecosystems: Other components
Population
ecology
Species
Species
interaction
Spatial
ecology
Niche
Other
networks
Other
Methodology
Spatial scale
Organisation or scope
Taxonomy ortaxon
Biome orbiogeographical
Ecological phenomena
Interdisciplinarity
Other
Portals:
Ecology at Wikipedia'ssister projects:
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ecology&oldid=1317917617"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp